31 Dec: EoP Applicants & Lawyers: Summary of EoP ICC Complaint Req for Counsel Correspondence

Request Assistance of Counsel [PDF]; Mahesh Mehta [PDF]

31 Dec: EoP Applicants & Lawyers: Summary of EoP ICC Complaint Req for Counsel Correspondence

From: Lara Johnstone | To: EoP Applicants; Req Counsel, Back Up Applicants
CC: Observers & Ft Meade: Col Foley
Sent:
Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:35 PM
Subject: EoP Applicants & Lawyers: Summary of EoP ICC Complaint Req for Counsel Correspondence

From: MILED EoP-PoW Clerk: Andrea Muhrrteyn [mailto:andreamuhrrteyn@mweb.co.za]
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 3:35 PM
To: ‘Vice Admiral Nanette Derenzi: via US Navy JAG: VADM James W Crawford III via JAG Knowledge.Info.Svc’; ‘VADM Dennis McGinn via CNA Military Advisory Board Members: US Army: Gen Paul Kern’; ‘Army: F.Ch.Staff: Gen Gordon Sullivan’; ‘US EU Command: F.Dep.Comm: Gen. Charles Chuck Wald’; ‘US Amb in Pretoria: Amb Patrick Gaspard’; ‘Timothy McVeigh’; ‘via DOJ-NSD Asst AG-NS: Lisa Monaco: RE: Timothy McVeigh’; ‘Copy to: NSA: Gen Keith Alexander’; ‘Erik Prince: Frontier Services Group’; ‘Copy to: GOP: Brown Ellen – Inhofe’; ‘Michigan Republicans: Sam Bissell’; ‘President Vladimir Putin via Kremlin Press Office’; ‘Copy to: Amb Mikhail Petrakov: RU Emb-Pta’; ‘David Petraeus’; ‘Raymond Odierno and John Mulholland via US Army Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff’; ‘Stan McChrystal’; ‘Brigadier General Steven Anderson’; ‘Admiral Bobby R. Inman U. S. Navy Ret.’; ‘General Charles H. Jacoby Jr.’; ‘General Joseph W. Ralston’; ‘General James Cartwright USMC Ret.’; ‘Daniel William Christman’; ‘Admiral Steve Abbot USN’; ‘Robert Tyrer’; ‘James M Bodner’; ‘Bruce McDonald’; ‘Thomas Reeve “Tom” Pickering’; ‘Robert L. Grenier’; ‘Andrew Holland’; ‘Judith A. “Jami” Miscik’; ‘Jonathan Allen’; ‘Daniel J Smith’; ‘Ralph Schneider’; ‘Starr Cooper’; ‘Francis A Branch CIV OSD OUSD INTEL’; ‘Wilma J Atkins CIV US’; ‘Lawrence Fowler C CIV US’; ‘Thomas Moorman’; ‘General Anthony Charles Zinni USMC Ret.’; ‘LtCol Thomas Brown USAF’; ‘LtCol Emanuel Cohan USAF’; ‘LtCol James C. Bennett USAF’; ‘Col Frank Battistelli’; ‘LtCol Peter F. Olsen USAF’; ‘Wesley Miller’; ‘Judge James Gray’; ‘Horst Mahler Sylvia Stoltz via Prof Dr Frank Arloth’; ‘Daniel Kettiger: Kettiger Law Solutions’; ‘Center of Competence for Public Management’; ‘Katya Komisaruk’; ‘Ivan Pavlov’; ‘Erin Brockovich’; ‘Mahesh Chandra Mehta’; ‘Tony Oposa’; ‘Justice Ngcobo via Lynette Bios’; ‘Paul Kruger’; ‘John Echohawk’; ‘Luis Moreno Ocampo’; ‘Luis Moreno Ocampo’; ‘Judge C G Weeramantry’
Cc: ‘Judge Jay Bybee: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’; ‘David Coombs Office’; ‘Zbigniew Brzezinski’; ‘Major General Dana Pittard’; ‘Major General Herbert Raymond McMaster’; ‘John W. Whitehead’; ‘Donald Rumsfeld’; ‘USMC JCS: Dir Joint Force Dev: Lt Gen George Flynn’; ‘Supreme Court Justices via DoJ: SupremeCtBriefs’; ‘Holy See in London – Nuntius’; ‘Grand Lodge of TX: Grand Secretary’; ‘Arif Hasan Akhundzada’; ‘USMC General Mattis via Dep Comm: Col James Clark: Camp Lejeune Marine Corps Base’; ‘Col Edward C. Rothstein’
Subject: EoP Applicants & Lawyers: Summary of EoP ICC Complaint Req for Counsel Correspondence

TO: Applicants:
Vice Admiral Nanette Derenzi: via US Navy JAG: VADM James W Crawford III via JAG Knowledge.Info.Svc (JAGIR@navy.mil); VADM Dennis McGinn via CNA Military Advisory Board Members: US Army: Gen Paul Kern (pkern@cohengroup.net); Army: F.Ch.Staff: Gen Gordon Sullivan (gsullivan@ausa.org); US EU Command: F.Dep.Comm: Gen. Charles Chuck Wald(cwald@deloitte.com); US Amb in Pretoria: Amb Patrick Gaspard (embassypretoria@state.gov);Timothy McVeigh (truthseeker2436577@yahoo.com); via DOJ-NSD Asst AG-NS: Lisa Monaco: RE:Timothy McVeigh (nsd.public@usdoj.gov); Copy to: NSA: Gen Keith Alexander(KBalexanderLTG@nsa.gov); Erik Prince: Frontier Services Group (info@fsgroup.com); Copy to: GOP: Brown Ellen – Inhofe (Ellen_Brown@inhofe.senate.gov); Michigan Republicans: Sam Bissell(SBissell@migop.org); President Vladimir Putin via Kremlin Press Office(press_office@prpress.gov.ru); Copy to: Amb Mikhail Petrakov: RU Emb-Pta (ruspospr@mweb.co.za);David Petraeus (david.petraeus@kkr.com); Raymond Odierno and John Mulholland via US ArmyOffice of the Deputy Chief of Staff (usarmy.pentagon.hqda-dcs-g-1.mbx.command-programs@mail.mil); Stan McChrystal (stan@mcchrystalgroup.com).

TO: Back Up Applicants:
Brigadier General Steven Anderson (sanderson@gorelyant.com); Admiral Bobby R. Inman U. S. Navy Ret. (inman@austin.utexas.edu); General Charles H. Jacoby Jr.(Charles.Jacoby@northcom.mil); General Joseph W. Ralston (jralston@cohengroup.net); General James Cartwright USMC Ret. (jcartwright@nobleenergyinc.com); Daniel William Christman(DChristman@USChamber.com); Admiral Steve Abbot USN (Steve.Abbot@nmcrs.org); Robert Tyrer(rtyrer@cohengroup.net); James M Bodner (jbodner@cohengroup.net); Bruce McDonald(bmacdonald@usip.org); Thomas Reeve “Tom” Pickering (thomas.r.pickering@boeing.com); Robert L. Grenier (rgrenier7@gmail.com); Andrew Holland (aholland@americansecurityproject.org); Judith A. “Jami” Miscik (JMiscik@kissingerinc.com); Jonathan Allen (allen_jonathan@bah.com); Daniel J Smith (dsmith@gorelyant.com); Ralph Schneider (ralph@beckerusa.com); Starr Cooper(scooper@academi.com); Francis A Branch CIV OSD OUSD INTEL (francis.a.branch.civ@mail.mil);Wilma J Atkins CIV US (wilma.j.atkins.civ@mail.mil); Lawrence Fowler C CIV US(lawrence.c.fowler2.civ@mail.mil); Thomas Moorman (moorman_thomas@bah.com); General Anthony Charles Zinni USMC Ret. (fwaconsultants@gmail.com); LtCol Thomas Brown USAF(thomas.brown.6@us.af.mil); LtCol Emanuel Cohan USAF (emanuel.cohan@us.af.mil); LtCol James C. Bennett USAF (james.bennett@us.af.mil); Col Frank Battistelli (frank.battistelli@us.af.mil); LtCol Peter F. Olsen USAF (peter.olsen@us.af.mil)

TO: Request for Counsel:
Wesley Miller (wesleytmiller@comcast.net); Judge James Gray (jimpgray@sbcglobal.net); Horst Mahler Sylvia Stoltz via Prof Dr Frank Arloth (poststelle@stmj.bayern.de); Daniel Kettiger: Kettiger Law Solutions (info@kettiger.ch); Center of Competence for Public Management(daniel.kettiger@kpm.unibe.ch); Katya Komisaruk (justcause@lawcollective.org); Ivan Pavlov(ipavlov@svobodainfo.org); Erin Brockovich (erin@brockovich.com); Mahesh Chandra Mehta(mcmeftp@gmail.com); Tony Oposa (tonyoposa1024@gmail.com); Justice Ngcobo via Lynette Bios(Bios@concourt.org.za); Paul Kruger (paulkruger7@gmail.com); John Echohawk(jechohawk@narf.org); Luis Moreno Ocampo (Luis_Moreno_Ocampo@hks.harvard.edu); Luis Moreno Ocampo (lmoreno-ocampo@getnicklaw.com); Judge C G Weeramantry(Christie.Weeramantry@monash.edu).

CC: Observers:
Judge Jay Bybee: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (jay.bybee@unlv.edu); David CoombsOffice (info@armycourtmartialdefense.com); Zbigniew Brzezinski (ZBrzezinski@csis.org); Major General Dana Pittard (dana.j.pittard.mil@mail.mil); Major General Herbert Raymond McMaster(herbert.r.mcmaster.mil@mail.mil); John W. Whitehead (johnw@rutherford.org); Donald Rumsfeld(daniel@javelindc.com); USMC JCS: Dir Joint Force Dev: Lt Gen George Flynn(george.flynn@mail.mil); Supreme Court Justices via DoJ: SupremeCtBriefs  (SupremeCtBriefs@usdoj.gov); Holy See in London – Nuntius (Nuntius@globalnet.co.uk); Grand Lodge of TX: Grand Secretary (gs@grandsecretaryoftx.org); Arif Hasan Akhundzada(arif.hasan.akhundzada@gmail.com); USMC General Mattis via Dep Comm: Col James Clark: Camp Lejeune Marine Corps Base (hqmc.comrel@usmc.mil).

CC: Ft George C Meade Garrison Commander: Col Brian P Foley
via: Col Edward C. Rothstein (edward.c.rothstein.mil@mail.mil)

EoP Applicants & Lawyers: Summary of EoP ICC Complaint Req for Counsel Correspondence

There has been no response from the Requested Assistance of Counsel.

Put simply: they appear unable to answer the questions:

Are you an – I give a fuck about an Honourable International law social contract – Lawyer, Prosecutor or Judge; and if so:

Do — I give a fuck about an Honourable American/Russian Foreign Policy and international law social contract– Applicants and/or Back Up applicants exist for you to represent?

I know a Green Eyed Seminole Special Forces Sgt CIA Assassin – John Doe # 2 of the Oklahoma City Bombing – who is quite willing to generally speaking verbally in your face; inform niggers, spicks and towelheads to stop breeding like cockroaches on viagra; and nazi, chink and jap corporate supremacists to give up their addiction to welfare vote farm slavery cannon fodder cheap labour.

Are there Generals, Admirals, Colonels, Presidents, terrorists and mercenaries, lawyers, prosecutors and judges willing to provide that Green Eyed Seminole Sgt with back up by finding their cohones [if they ever had any] and – generally speaking – inform the niggers, spicks and towelheads to stop breeding like cockroaches on viagra; and the nazi, chink and jap corporate supremacists to give up their addiction to welfare vote farm slavery cannon fodder cheap labour?

If we are the only dumbfuck village idiots who prefer honest, honourable, humane and orderly depopulation; then we shall have to confront that reality.

If so we should call it quits and the Sheva and Lucifer Cryptic Gods of Death and their corporate cocksucking ‘pretend we give a fuck about duhmockery’ politicians with Masonic Fortune 500 Dollar signs spewing out their ears; can continue your/their Yum Yum Economic and Population Growth Auschwitz, Bhopal, Chernobyl, Gallipoli Cannibal Bar-B-Que feasts.

=========== Excerpt Correspondence to Global Inst for Prevention of Aggression; if you didn’t read it ==========

Re: WiP Kampala ‘crimes of aggression’ definition

[..] EoP Simplify Suggestion:

“If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough.” – Albert Einstein

  1. Nation states standing army or dissident guerrilla army ‘terrorism’ resource war military aggression – like climate change, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources – are a direct and indirect consequence of overpopulation and overconsumption.
  2. Overconsumption and overpopulation are a direct consequence of humans procreating and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits.
  3. Humans procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits because the current international law social contract; provides the worlds nation states constitutions provide nation state citizens with the implied ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’.
  4. Humans will stop procreating and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits when legislators amend the current international law and national constitutional social contract statutes that enable procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; to specifically require all the worlds/their nations citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

If or when such EoP international law legislation existed: Any political party that attempted to bribe its nations citizens to vote for it; or to fund it; in exchange for offerings of ‘right to breed’ or ‘right to produce/consume’ above ecological carrying capacity limits; could be charged with crimes of aggression acts of war in the nations courts; and if found guilty lose their political party licenses. Any nation’s courts that refused to penalize such a political party with loss of political party licensing could be legally charged in an international court; by any individual in that nation or another nation for their crimes of aggression acts of war intentions to bribe their citizens to overbreed or overconsume contributing to resource scarcity and resource wars.

I imagine it shall be far cheaper and easier for a prosecutor to prove ‘overbreeding’ and/or ‘overconsumption’ in a court of law; or overbreeding / consumption bribery; than it currently is to prove current multiple different definitions of ‘corruption’ etc; that not only confuse citizens; but in and of such citizen confusion is the seed of the citizens distrust of the legal systems impartiality, honesty and integrity; and the source in citizens and lawyers minds that a bundle of lies is the edifice upon which the legal establishment is built; that courts are not courts for the clear fair and honest resolution of disputes in simple village idiot language understood by the common man; but religious psychological warfare battle of wits temples. [Sajjan Poovayya: Common Myths about Indian lawyers]

Current International Law Right to Breed & Consume:

There are many examples of current international law statutes that directly and indirectly provide citizens with the right to breed and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; and lawyers, prosecutors and Judges who apply them, all while pretending their courts are concerned with ‘truth’ and ‘evidence’; pretending they have fuck all clue why and how those statutes result in food shortages & inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources and climate change; inter-racial, religious and cultural social conflict; psycho-social conflict; not to mention overpopulation and consumption resource depletion and scarcity induced resource wars; which sometimes manifest as genocide and holocausts.

Put simply: unlike Arthur Edens and Michael Clayton – they are in total denial that they are Sheva the legal cryptic gods of death.

[..]

Summary of the origins and practices of Sheva & Lucifer the cryptic gods of death:

The following are – in my view relevant excerpts from – EoP PoW et al -v- Norwegian Nobel Committee et al; for your consideration:

————Excerpt: EoP PoW et al -v- Norwegian Nobel Committee et al ————–

AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence’s Innocence for Sale Indulgence Legal Matrix:

“Corporations are a Frankenstein monster which States have created by their corporation laws.” – Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis, 1916

“Every right must be evaluated in the network of all rights claimed and the environment in which these rights are exercised. If we hold that every right, “natural” or not, must be evaluated in the total system of rights operating in a world that is limited, we must inevitably conclude that no right can be presumed to be absolute, that the effect of each right on the suppliers as well as on the demanders must be determined before we can ascertain the quantity of right that is admissible. From here on out, ours is a limited world. Rights must also be limited. The greater the population, the more limited the per capita supply of all goods; hence the greater must be the limitation on individual rights, including the right to breed. At its heart, this is the political meaning of the population problem.” – Garrett Hardin, Limited World, Limited Rights

Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix Reality doctrine — the Inalienable ‘Right to Breed and Consume, but you need a License to Own a Gun, a License to Drive a Car, a License to Practice Law, a television license, a credit license, a license to earn a living, a university exemption license, a license to fish, a license to hunt, a liquor license, a business license, a marriage license, in some U.S. states, five year olds, even need to get a license to run a lemonade stand on their front lawn — hypocritically referred to as the ‘rule-of-law’ is a legal world of lawyers, politicians and priests, who prefer to negligently ignore, plausibly deny, or socio-psycho-phallicly benefit from the conquer-and-multiply and divide and conquer control over the means of human reproduction and consumption. It is a Matrix reality, of legal, political and religious indulgence salesmen.

It is a legal world, very similar to the Matrix religious world that existed before Martin Luther confronted the religious indulgence salesmen with his Ninety-Five Theses, on the Church of All Saints, on 31 October 1517, thereby initiating the Protestant Reformation.

In the Catholic Church’s religious Matrix world, only Catholic Bishops were entitled to be interpreters of the ‘word of god’. Only they could decide what God meant, about who was guilty and who was innocent, who would go to hell and who would go to heaven. God did not speak to common people, except via the Catholic Church’s bishops.

In Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix world, only those who swear blind obedience to Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix world – lawyers, prosecutors and judges – are deemed to possess the supposed superior intellectual Legal Godlike capabilities, to decipher, decode and interpret the ‘word of civilized patriarch gods’, hence capable of deciding which of us mere Commons surplus cannon fodder mortals acts of commission, or omission, is ‘lawful’ or ‘unlawful’.

Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix ‘AnthroCorpocentric law’ is based upon Flat Earth ‘jurisprudence’, as per the demands of those capable of purchasing Flat Earth legislation indulgences which make their ecologically – breeding/consumption war — criminal acts, to be deemed as ‘legal/lawful’ conduct by the Legal Matrix Bishops: lawyers, prosecutors and Judges.

It is a Matrix world of legal indulgence salesmen; who — ‘Contempt in Facie Curiae’ — demand the public’s sycophantic submissive obedience; for their supposed superior intellectual Godlike capabilities, to decipher, decode and interpret which of us mere Commons surplus cannon and vote fodder mortals acts of commission, or omission, is ‘lawful’ or ‘unlawful’.

Thieving, Conquering, Murdering and Culling Acts of Un/Lawfulness:

“Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.” – Henry Kissinger; The Final Days, by Bob Woodward & Carl Bernstein

Surplus vote fodder citizens may convert to becoming cannon-fodder citizens by joining the military to commit conquering or culling acts of murder and theft, as long as their murder and theft is sanctioned as a lawful conquer, culling or theft order, by one or more groups of left/right conquer-and-multiply legal indulgence salesmen.

In this Matrix Reality legal world, soldiers tasked with the national security conquering and culling responsibilities, of conquering to thieve another tribe’s resources, and culling population ‘useless eaters’ and ‘oxygen thieves’ surplus population excesses; on behalf of the conquering and culling profiteering demands of civilized patriarchy’s civilian corporate and political elite; constantly find themselves confronted with the conquer-or-culling “Befehl ist Befehl” Catch 22 dilemma:

To obey, or not to obey, a ‘Lebensraum’, ‘Difaqane’, ‘Operation Freedumb’ and the thousands like them, order to conquer or cull; since a lawful conquer or culling order, by one group of left/right conquer-and-multiply legal indulgence salesmen, can easily be reinterpreted to be an unlawful order, by another group of opposing left/right conquer-and multiply legal indulgence salesmen; presenting a Catch 22 dilemma from which there is no legal escape.

One who refuses a ‘lawful’ conquering or culling order will still probably be jailed for refusing orders, and one who accepts an ‘unlawful order will be jailed for committing unlawful culling or conquering acts.

Who decides, what is, and what is not, a conquering or culling lawful, or unlawful order?

The ‘Inalienable Right to Breed’ Matrix Reality conquer-and-multiply indulgence salesmen, with their specious justifications, and nightmare of Legal Matrix reality generated bureaucratic stare-decisis cryptic rules and statutes, of course!

“I don’t know what you mean by ‘glory,’ ” Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. “Of course you don’t—till I tell you. I meant ‘there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!’ ”
“But ‘glory’ doesn’t mean ‘a nice knock-down argument’,” Alice objected.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”
— Through the Looking Glass, by Lewis Carroll

Anthropocentric Master’s of ‘Relevance’ Jurisprudence:

The question in a civilized patriarchy court is only concerned with who is the master of one word: ‘relevance’.

Any question or answer that exposes civilized patriarchy’s Legal Matrix system for what it is; a system far more corrupt than the Catholic Church’s Indulgences for Sale religious matrix, is simply deemed as ‘irrelevant’.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges defy the laws of ecology with a massive ‘fuck you’, by legislating, interpreting and enforcing Legal Matrix doctrine, that encourages citizens to breed and consume above cultural carrying capacity limits.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges know that legislation which ignores carrying capacity limits results in ecological overshoot, surplus vote-cannon-fodder populations, economic hierarchical inequality, and scarcity induced local, national and international conflict.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges know that legislation which enables ecological overshoot in multi-cultural/ethnic/religious communities, manifests as inter-cultural / ethnic / religious conflict.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges know that inter-cultural / ethnic conflict is a great divide and conquer tool to manipulate the proletariat to perceive other cultural/ethnic proletariat as the source of their own overshoot-scarcity-conflict misery.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges sit in judgement about an accused’s case of theft or murder; while consciously ignoring the theft and thievery and participation in mass murder of the civilized patriarchy corporate elite, who purchased ‘Innocence for Sale’ Indulgences from legislators to avoid legislation that defines their ecologically criminal acts of billion and trillion dollar thievery and murder as ‘unlawful’.

What is relevant?:

It is relevant that civilized patriarchy’s penis constitutions human factory farming rights to breed and consume, is to be master —that’s all.

Who says so?:

Civilized Patriarchy’s ecologically illiterate Legal Matrix Legislator’s, lawyers, judges and prosecutors ego-genitals say so!

[..]

Totalitarian Agriculture as the source of Taker resource scarcity social-conflict contract problems:

The problems with Taker social contract occurred with the invention of Totalitarian agriculture; which describes the behaviour of humans who violate their original indigenous tribal territory’s by choosing to engage in surplus food production (economic growth); resulting in surplus human (population growth).

When any tribe of humans overbreed and/or overconsume the natural resources in their perceived tribal territory; they travel beyond their tribal territory to go and find resources they have over-consumed and degraded. When such a tribe enters another tribes territory, then conflict occurs (from economic, political to physical, an organized violence warfare). To limit inter-tribal territorial resource acquisition conflict, all tribes must agree to limit procreation and consumption to their tribal territory ecological carrying capacity limits.

Simplistically the history of war can be summed up as: Every single battle between two groups of racial, religious, ethnic, or ideological warriors, engaged in organized violence resource thieving or defence, since the advent of totalitarian agriculture, was a result of one or both of those tribes having overbred and/or overconsumed, and engaging in resource thieving into another tribes territory.

Since the beginning of humans (whatever you believe that beginning to be) humans lived in nomadic hunter gatherer tribes, like the Bushmen, Aborigine’s, etc. Male duties were to hunt and protect the tribe. Women’s duties were to forage and nurture the young. Both men and women contributed to the tribe’s economic resources and duties, hence power was shared reasonably equally. Tribes were concerned about not overbreeding; since such overbreeding resulted in the resources in a territory being depleted quicker, and less resources for the rest of the tribe; requiring them to move to new territories. After three million years of humans living like hunter gatherers, it is estimated that the human population at the beginning of the Neolithic period was around ten million.

Then things changed very quickly for the tribes who invented Totalitarian agriculture. Women invented agriculture, resulting from their close association and experimentation with seeds and plants, in their role as foragers. This change occurred because some tribes started practicing a particular form of ‘surplus agriculture’ (hereinafter referred to as ‘totalitarian agriculture’) where farmers grew large surpluses of stored food. The consolidation of agriculture results in the centralization of political power: cities & civilization. Before the discovery of oil and coal, the practice of totalitarian agriculture farming was far more labour intensive than hunting and subsistence farming; so men took over agriculture; and women were now relegated to being brood sows, to breed economic and cannon fodder: children to work in the fields or be soldiers. Surplus food meant that some members of the tribe could now work in other specialized fields: soldiers, clerks, etc; and also that the tribes could grow their tribes population. World population doubled in three thousand years; and again in only two thousand years. It jumped from ten million to fifty million—probably eighty percent of them being practitioners of totalitarian agriculture. It was getting crowded.

Beginning of War is Peace War resulting from overbreeding and overconsuming: In all of three million years, humans had never been crowded anywhere. But now the people of practicing totalitarian agriculture were learning what it means to be crowded. Overworked, overgrazed land was becoming less and less productive. There were more people, and they were competing for dwindling resources; and people now began to organize their tribes into forms of standing armies to fight for land or resources. The tribes first war-making machinery: warlords—kings, princes, emperors and their nation states formed for the purpose of armed defense and aggression. “It’s during this period that we see the standing army forged as the monarch’s sword of power. Without a standing army, a king is just a windbag in fancy clothes. But with a standing army, a king can impose his will on his enemies and engrave his name in history—and absolutely the only names we have from this era are the names of conquering kings. No scientists, no philosophers, no historians, no prophets, just conquerors. For the first time in human history, the important people are the people with armies.”

Evolution of War is Peace War: Advancement and acquisition of Human and Military Technology and Capital vs Breeding of CannonFodder: In a battle between two armies with the same level of military skill and technology; generally the bigger army wins. Many of history’s military conquerors have relied on simply growing cannon fodder to slaughter on the battlefields to win their battles or wars. Some military conquerors focussed on improving their soldiers skills (psychological, physical, intellectual, spiritual, etc), technology (better armor, better swords, better chariots, better bows and arrows, better scaling machines, better rams, better artillery, better guns, better tanks, better planes, better bombs, better rockets, better nerve gas, better germs, better chemicals); and legal moral supremacist ‘innocence for sale’ indulgence interpretations psychological warfare doctrine. Many times small armies with greater technological equipment and/or military tactical or strategic skills won: There are many examples, but two are Battle of Blood River (guns), conquest of North and South America (guns, germs & steel).

WiP Resource Conflict: Initially economic, then political, and finally military organized conflict: Centuries of conflict over resources generated an international law social contract founded upon Masonic phallic force (rule of force international treaties); that rewarded those who engage inseething energies of lucifer breeding and consumption wars; which bribe their tribes members to believe it is their ‘inalienable [freedumb slavery] right’ to breed and consume above carrying capacity limits; while denying personal responsibility for the human factory farming organized violence conquer and culling racism, sexism, nationalism, socialism, capitalism, nazism, islamism, zionism, corporatism, stalinism, human sacrifice culling, etc consequences; as people are motivated beyond retardation (motarded) to choose to join one or other ideological, religious, racial or cultural tribe to engage in resource war thieving to accumulate more resources to grow their tribe to enable it to protect itself from another tribes organized violence resource war thieving.

Totalitarian Agriculture’s Luciferian Evil Human Sacrifice Harvest Religions:

“When The Mason learns that the Key to the warrior on the block is the proper application of the dynamo of living power, he has learned the Mystery of his Craft. The seething energies of Lucifer are in his hands and before he may step onward and upward, he must prove his ability to properly apply this energy.” – Manly Palmer Hall,  Illustrious: the Lost Keys of Freemasonry

“in this case the defendants are not simply accused of planning or directing wholesale killings through channels. They are not charged with sitting in an office hundreds and thousands of miles away from the slaughter. It is asserted with particularity that these men were in the field actively superintending, controlling, directing, and taking an active part in the bloody harvest.” – Nuremberg Military Tribunal, United States of America vs. Otto Ohlendorf, et. al. (“Einsatzgruppen trial”), Judgment.

All civilized religions — from Christianity, to Gnosticism, etc — were ‘created’ in the minds of man to comprehend the concept of ‘evil’ (aka organized violence), subsequent to man’s invention of agriculture, approximately 10,000 years ago; and where such agriculture created food surpluses, resulting in population surpluses, and expansion of their territory resulting in population pressure clashes with other tribes territories, resource war conflict.

Extended misery resulting from direct and psychic existential conflict resulted in man’s attempt to understand so-called ‘evil’; or put more simply: the organized resource thieving direct conflict (rape, murder, slavery, etc) resulting from population pressures and escalating relations with fellow humans based upon the absence of consent, i.e. extended periods of psychic and physical violence and coercion.

If there are two or ten people living on an island with enough food and other resources and space, for one hundred people; there is no need to coerce another for food or resources freely and abundantly available. In the absence of a resource scarcity conflict mindset, and plenty of space, tribal relations are more conductive to cooperation and sharing. Living in the moment. There is no need for an external God in the sky to explain ‘evil’; there is only a consciousness to appreciate the source of resource abundance, as the ‘source of life’; and to live in harmony with such source: nature. Violence is limited to food chain violence experienced by all species; namely hunting and being hunted by another predator for immediate food. [See also: Law of Limited Competition]

If the tribe introduces agriculture, which results in an agricultural surplus and uses such agricultural surplus to justify greater population; then as the population increases, so the population pressures increase. There is less space to run away from someone who may be temporarily angry, or wanting something another is not willing to provide in that moment. The existence of ‘evil’ (organized violence) is plausibly directly proportional to the resource war conflict, resulting from the tribe’s violation of carrying capacity limits; and/or coming into contact with another tribe’s territorial expansion as a result of their violation of carrying capacity limits. In attempting to understand the existential meaning of this symptom of ‘evil’ resulting from violation of carrying capacity limits resource war conflict, man created religions…

The invention of agriculture and agricultural surpluses, and subsequent organized violence of civilization are the biblical story of Adam and Eve’s loss of living in carrying capacity harmony with the natural world resource abundant paradise, and Cain’s choice to be a farmer. Others saw opportunities for socio-political status benefits from exploiting the reality of organized violence (evil), and suppressed this conscious reality of their intentions by invoking various phallic ‘right’ justifications for their ‘right’ to engage in organized violence (evil).

The Mason’s ‘seething energies of lucifer’ are the psychological warfare art of manipulating and coercing men and women to overbreed and overconsume, to thereby aggravate resource war conflict, and the ability to divide and conquer people’s, for the socio-political profit of the ‘warrior’, to ‘step onward and upward’; as he ‘proves his human sacrifice ability’ to apply his breeding war and consumption war energies. Put differently, the ‘seething energies of lucifer’ are no less than the phallic justification for profiting from aggravating and perpetuating deliberate organized violence, without the consent of the recipients of the violence.

Totalitarian Agriculture WiP Tower of Babel Empires that violently collapsed: Humans who engage in totalitarian agriculture, engage in Predator-Prey Growth and Collapse of Civilization/Empire cycles: Greco-Rome, Minoan, Mycenaean, Sumerians, Akkadian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Achaemenid, Seleucid, Zhou, Han, Tang, Song, Parthian, Sassanid, Umayyad, Abbasid, Mauryan, Gupta, Maya, Hittite, Harrapan and Teotihuacan. Collapses result from (1) Ecological Strain due to procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; and (2) Economic Stratification; and have included the disappearance of between 90-99% of their populations (from famine, disease and organized violence resource wars) including their kings, Gods, calendars and other complex political and cultural institutions.

————End Excerpt: EoP PoW et al -v- Norwegian Nobel Committee et al ————–

Fate: Unintended Consequences: Catton: Seyright Mills of Columbia Univ’s sociological definition of fate. Fate is what happens when innumerable people make innumerable small decisions about other matters that have the collective cumulative effect that nobody intended. That’s what happened when we overpopulated the world. …. a fusion of forces that separated us from the laws of life… that told us that we could live apart from those laws of limits, without rules.” — What a Way to Go: Life at the End of Empire.

What shall your decisions be: New Ecology of Peace international law rules; or current Masonic War is Peace international law ‘WTF is the Befehl?’ confucius rules?

=========== End Excerpt Correspondence to Global Inst for Prevention of Aggression; if you didn’t read it ==========

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk

.