20 Sep: Eeben Barlow’s Military and Security Blog: The Dangers of Ignoring Strategic Intelligence

* Eeben Barlow.
* 20 Sep: Eeben Barlow’s Military and Security Blog: The Dangers of Ignoring Strategic Intelligence.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v Eeben Barlow / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Law / EoP v WiP Neg.

Updated on 21 September 2016

Andrea Muhrrteyn 20 September 2016 at 12:17 PM

Edit/Correction: Forgot to include EoP v WiP Negotiations Comment Correspondence notice.


I imagine you are referring to Masonic War is Peace ‘strategic intelligence’ and ‘national security’. If Masonic War is Peace states don’t decide to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; they shall all ultimately  collapse prior to or with the world economy resource collision Human (Predator) and Nature (Prey) Dynamics (HANDY) studies: Ecological Strain and Economic Stratification and/or ‘species extinction’ collapse.

Clearest non-racial, non-religious, non-ideological definition of Strategic Intelligence, that is based upon ecological reality; not ego I come across is available at EoP MILED Clerk Notice:

‘Ecology of Peace factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.’

Ecology of Peace culture definition of ‘National Security’:

Prior to Ecology of Peace international law social contract: The Ecology of Peace culture’s definition of National Security is ‘the necessity of individuals (A) concerned about (i) protecting and conserving natural resources return to sustainable local and national carrying capacity limits; and (ii) honourable resolution of national and international overpopulation/consumption inter-cultural resource war conflict; to unconditionally or conditionally cooperate to (B) implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that requires all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; and eliminate cheaters from the planetary genepool.

Subsequent to the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract: EoP Intnl Law National Security Definition Draft: Planetary security and hence National security is defined as ‘the necessity of individuals, families and nation states to unconditionally co-operate to (A) protect the Ecology of Peace social contract so as to (i) sustainably protect and conserve natural resources in accordance to local and national carrying capacity limits and (ii) restrict national and international inter-cultural resource war conflict; by (B) requiring their citizens to (a) monitor other individuals, tribes, or nation’s procreation and consumption behaviours to verify they are breeding and/or consuming below ecological carrying capacity limits; (b) report breeding and/or consumption cheater individual, family or national scarcity combatant violators to appropriate  local or international authorities; and (c) eliminate convicted breeding and/or consumption scarcity combatant cheaters from the planetary genepool.’

A copy of this correspondence shall be documented in: EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations: Comments Correspondence [PDF]: Eben Barlow Military & Security blog.


Eeben Barlow’s MilSec blog on 21 September 2016 at 7:40 AM

Thanks for your input Andrea but I was actually referring to Africa in general and not specifically at anything else.

As it stands, Africa is frequently misadvised by foreign ‘partners’ – whether intentionally or on purpose only those giving the advice can tell – and this creates a huge ripple-effect across the continent. This ripple-effect or collapsing of dominoes has massive implications for not only governments but for the people they are governing.

Having had the opportunity to travel and work in many places in Africa, I can testify to this.




Andrea Muhrrteyn 21 September 2016 at 19:47 PM



“You can’t defeat an enemy you don’t admit exists” – Lt Gen Michael Flynn. “If ISIS [Al Qaeda, blah blah blah] goes away, something else will take its place; we need a long range strategy addressing root causes’ – General Richard Myers. “The conservation of natural resources is the fundamental problem. Unless we solve that problem, it will avail us little to solve all others.” – US President Teddy Roosevelt; Michael Flynn: Defining the Enemy; Richard Myers: War Economy Recipe Book.

My interpretation of your ‘Dangers of Ignoring Strategic Intelligence …. Just because the intelligence does not match their ethnic, financial, racial, religious, or xenophobic narrative, it does not mean that it is wrong or false or even non-existent‘ post was that maybe you may be interested in Ecology of Peace culture perspective on ‘strategic intelligence’. It was not clear whether you were aware of the fundamental difference’s between Ecology of Peace or Masonic War is Peace culture, including strategic intelligence.

Strategic intelligence (STRATINT) pertains both to the collection, processing, analysis, and dissemination of intelligence that is required for forming policy and military plans at the national and international level.

According to Michael Macoby STRATINT includes the following abilities: (i) foresight: understand trends that present threats or opportunities; (ii) visioning: to conceptualize an ideal future state and create a process to engage others to implement it; (iii) system thinking: perceive, synthesize, and integrate elements that function as a whole to achieve a common purpose; (iv) motivating:  motivate different people to work together to implement a vision; (v) partnering: develop strategic alliances.


Re: Difference between EoP and WiP Effective Strategists & Policy Formulators:

Ecology of Peace identifies the root cause of any problem and applies STRATINT skills to eliminate the root cause of the problem. EoP Applicants [PDF] identified ‘the right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits clauses’ – aka policy — of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract; as the root cause of the majority of socio-economic and political problems resulting from resource depletion and resource wars: including among others: climate change, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, climate change, terrorism, feminism, nazism, Islamism, capitalism, communism, militarization of police, etc.

Masonic War is Peace is about consciously or unconsciously identifying the root cause of the problem, and applying STRATINT to deliberately perpetuate the problem indefinitely so as to socio-politically and financially parastically profit of the misery resulting from the problem. The tap has been left on, the bath is overflowing. Masonic War is Peace profiteers argue about what colour mops to use; who is mopping; who is hiring chinks or japs or coolies to do the mopping, blah blah. Ecology of Peace STRATINT advisors simply point out the tap is causing the bath to overflow; and find out who is willing to cooperate to turn off the tap.

Needless to say Masonic War is Peace STRATINT isn’t very intelligent when their parasitic profiteering STRATINT policies are driving the entire planet like lemmings off the ecological tipping point cliff; unless suicide is their ultimate covert objective! If so: why not simply inform us clearly in simple english we can understand, what kind of suicide they prefer and we can arrange it; and they can happily depart. The rest of us who care about responsible freedom non-parasitic cooperative co-existence can apply our STRATINT skills and implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract enabling responsible freedom of for all.