* Vox, Zack Beauchamp, Forbes, Avik Roy, Think Progress, Jack Jenkins, Harpers, Christopher R. Beha, Giles Harvey, James Dobson, Family Research Council, Tony Perkins, Faith Freedom Coalition, Ralph Reed, Lance Lemmonds, Christian Coalition, Roberta Combs, Liberty Univ, Jerry Falwell Jr., Angela Rice, Greg Smith, Cynthia Schmidt, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, R Albert Mohler, Living Proof Ministries, Beth Moore, Jenn Hamm, Gospel Coalition, Collin Hansen, Catholic Vote, Rachel Held Evans, Tiffany Sawyer, Brittany Lassiter, Diana Butler Bass, Suzanne Wickham, Rev Dr William J Barber, Joe Ward, Breach Repairers, North Carolina NAACP, Center for Action Contemplation, Richard Rohr, Sojourners, Jim Wallis, James Simpson, UPhoenix, Ph Wayne Grudem, AuburnU, Paul Raushenbush, FtWorthU, Wil Gafney, UPenn Religious Studies, Anthea Butler, UBaylor, Alan Jacobs, WheatonC, Ed Stetzer, Noah Toly, Weekly Standard, Virginia Hume, Think Progress, Jack Jenkins, Mike Huckabee, NBC, Alex Johnson
* 15 Oct: Vox: A Republican intellectual explains why the Republican Party is going to die; Forbes: One Reason Why Tapes Of Donald Trump Bragging About Sexual Assault May Finally Get GOP Elites To Drop Him. Weekly Standard: Does God Want Us to Vote For Trump? NBC: What’s Behind Evangelical Support for Donald Trump? Less Than You Think. Think Progress: A list of faith leaders calling out the Religious Right for failing to abandon Trump. Mike Huckabee: Pence Shocked by Supporters Revolution Promise if Trump loses Election. Albert Mohler Thinking in Public: What Became of the Christian Intellectuals? A Conversation with Prof Alan Jacobs.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v Alt Right / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Religion / EoP RH FR / EoP v WiP Neg.
Last Updated: 15 Oct 2016: 21:09 PM GMT +2
15 Oct: Vox & Forbes
16 Oct: Weekly Standard, NBC, Think Progress, Mike Huckabee, Thinking in Public.
Vox: Zack Beauchamp (email@example.com) @zackbeauchamp
Forbes: Avik Roy (@avik)
Re: Vox: A Republican intellectual explains why the Republican Party is going to die; Forbes: One Reason Why Tapes Of Donald Trump Bragging About Sexual Assault May Finally Get GOP Elites To Drop Him.
Re: “But he also believes the Republican Party has lost its right to govern, because it is driven by white nationalism rather than a true commitment to equality for all Americans. “Until the conservative movement can stand up and live by that principle, it will not have the moral authority to lead the country,” he told me.”
[..] This revisionism, according to Roy, points to a much bigger conservative delusion: They cannot admit that their party’s voters are motivated far more by white identity politics than by conservative ideals. “Conservative intellectuals, and conservative politicians, have been in kind of a bubble,” Roy says. “We’ve had this view that the voters were with us on conservatism — philosophical, economic conservatism. In reality, the gravitational center of the Republican Party is white nationalism.” Conservative intellectuals, for the most part, are horrified by racism. When they talk about believing in individual rights and equality, they really mean it. Because the Republican Party is the vehicle through which their ideas can be implemented, they need to believe that the party isn’t racist.
[..] And they deny that to this day, Republican voters are driven more by white resentment than by a principled commitment to the free market and individual liberty. He expands on this idea: “It’s a common observation on the left, but it’s an observation that a lot of us on the right genuinely believed wasn’t true — which is that conservatism has become, and has been for some time, much more about white identity politics than it has been about conservative political philosophy. I think today, even now, a lot of conservatives have not come to terms with that problem.” This, Roy believes, is where the conservative intellectual class went astray. By refusing to admit the truth about their own party, they were powerless to stop the forces that led to Donald Trump’s rise.
[..] The work of conservative intellectuals today, he argues, is to devise a new conservatism — a political vision that adheres to limited government principles but genuinely appeals to a more diverse America.
Ecology of Peace perspective on the ideological flaws of among others: conservatism may be of interest:
“If your ‘conservatism’ has no buck stops here concern for establishing a legal social contract that legally conserves your nations resources; upon which all of life’s species rely upon for survival and sustenance; in accordance with ecological carrying capacity limits; by requiring your nation’s citizens to restrict their procreation and/or consumption to below ecological carrying capacity limits; then your ‘conservatism’ efforts to pretend to be concerned about conserving any other religious, racial or class cultural values is akin to farting against thunder. Put simply: If your conservatism is not about conserving the ecological carrying capacity resource foundations upon which all of life reside; your ‘conservatism’ ain’t nothing but fuck honour bullshit the public relations image management vote welfare bribery.” — 06 May 2016 correspondence to US Senate via Sen Ben Sasse; transcript in EoP Axis: MIC [PDF]
Of course the same could be said for:
“If your ‘liberalism’ ‘communism’ ‘nationalism’ ‘progressivism’ ‘racial powerism’ has no buck stops here concern for establishing a legal social contract that legally conserves your nations resources; upon which all of life’s species rely upon for survival and sustenance; in accordance with ecological carrying capacity limits; by requiring your nation’s citizens to restrict their procreation and/or consumption to below ecological carrying capacity limits; then your ‘liberalism’ ‘communism’ ‘nationalism’ ‘progressivism’ ‘racial powerism’ efforts to pretend to be concerned about conserving any ‘liberal’ ‘communist’ ‘nationalist’ ‘progressive’ ‘racial separatist self sufficiency; religious, racial or class cultural values is akin to farting against thunder. Put simply: If your ‘liberalism’ ‘communism’ ‘nationalism’ ‘progressivism’ ‘racial powerism’ is not about conserving the ecological carrying capacity resource foundations upon which all of life reside; your ‘liberalism’ ‘communism’ ‘nationalism’ ‘progressivism’ ‘racial powerism’ ain’t nothing but fuck honour bullshit the public relations image management vote welfare bribery.”
— EoP v WiP NWO Neg [PDF]: 07 May: Weekly Standard via Real Clear Politics.
In a world of finite resources; where ‘conservatism’ ideology is not founded on the rock of procreation and consumption policies that conserve resources in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; but free-‘right to breed and consume’-trade; the ultimate consequences of such free-‘right to breed and consume’-trade is resource depletion, resource scarcity, economic, political, — racial, religious, class identity — resource warfare.
Ecology of Peace Factual Reality Principles:
 Earth is not flat.
 Resources are finite.
 When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletionand resource conflict.
 Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of verpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
 The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits and consequently Nation States failure to (a) avoid resource depletion and sustainable protection of national renewable and non-renewable resources for other species and future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; are the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of the Masonic War is Peaceinternational law social contract’.
 If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.
Ecology of Peace Root Cause Problem Solving political party licensing suggestion submitted to Cop 21 and UNFCCC: UN Framework Convention on Climate Change to eliminate the manmade causes of global warming.
Cop 21 negotiators agree to support international law legislation requiring all the worlds nations political parties to agree to implement national legislation by 11 September 2016; that requires all their citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits. Any political party which refuses to cooperate; is to lose their political party license; and any nation that refuses to remove the violating political party’s license may be legally charged in an international court; by any individual in that nation or another nation with the intention to bribe their citizens to overbreed or overconsume; which shall be considered crimes of aggression acts of war; punishable by the death penalty for every single member of that political party. This would enable an even playing field for all political parties; whose election candidates would no longer be able to bribe their citizens with individual or corporate welfare to vote for their political party. Politicians shall have to find their Thomas Sankara backbones; to cooperate with their citizens to teach them how to become cooperating self-reliant sustainable nations.
More info at Ecology of Peace Wealth Transfer Option.
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Am I racist?
“If the three million white-minded Negroes are casting their ballots for integration and intermarriage, what do the nonvoting black masses want? Find out what the black masses want, and then perhaps America’s grave race problem can be solved.
The white conservatives aren’t friends of the Negro either, but they at least don’t try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them. But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the “smiling” fox. The job of the Negro civil rights leader is to make the Negro forget that the wolf and the fox both belong to the (same) family. Both are canines; and no matter which one of them the Negro places his trust in, he never ends up in the White House, but always in the dog house. The white liberals control the Negro and the Negro vote by controlling the Negro civil rights leaders. As long as they control the Negro civil rights leaders, they can also control and contain the Negro’s struggle, and they can control the Negro’s so-called revolt.” – Malcolm X, Gods Judgement of White America, 4 December 1963; KnowledgeFullCircle: Foxy White Liberals and Token Negro Leaders.
The only difference between ‘white identity racists’ and ‘most ‘civil rights liberals’ is that the white identity racists are overt about their racial supremacy beliefs; while the majority of alleged ‘non-racist civil rights liberals’ are covert about their racial supremacy beliefs. They secretly believe that non-europeans are in fact inferior untermencsh, particulary when it comes to procreation behaviours. Put differently; they don’t think non-europeans are capable of procreation self restraint. They are not alone in their covert secret beliefs about untermensch non-europeans. Many non-european elite themselves – irrespective of how much they stand on soap boxes and squeal about ‘racism’ etc; covertly believe that non-europeans are in fact inferior untermensch, particularly when it comes to procreation self-restraint.
Simply ask Van Jones or his hip-hop liberal buddy Billy Wimsatt whether they are willing to support an honest sincere root cause problem solving discussion about procreation behaviours with non-europeans; — what some, who make no effort to educate what they refer to as ‘human trash’ about the Masonic Human Factory Farming trash ideology foundation of dysgenic human trash breeding: Polish MP: Janusz Korwin-Mikke: “Europe is being flooded with human garbage that does not want to work”; Lebanese Minister of Tourism calls Palestinian Refugees ‘human garbage’ – Putin: EU Refugee Crisis absolutely to be expected — to enable the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens from all races and religions to breeding below ecological carrying capacity limits.
Put differently, if an overt or covert ‘racist’ does not consciously understand the root population pressure collision with finite resources causes of racial, class or religious identity politics; then their overt white, black, etc racialism or covert pretend we love the niggers, kikes, spicks bullshit the public relations non-racialism can be filed under reasonable unintentional ignorance.
If however, the overt or covert ‘racist’ does consciously understand the root population pressure collision with finite resources causes of racial, class or religious identity politics, and they do nothing whatsoever to attempt to educate about the root causes of overt and covert racialism, or worse deliberately attempt to obstruct such educational efforts; then their overt white, black, etc racialism or pretend we love the niggers, crackers, spicks bullshit the public relations non-racialism is conscious, intentional deliberate pouring kerosene on a candle overt or covert racialism.
Drinking Flint Michigan Milk at a Masonic War is Peace University Lunch Counter:
For the colonized minds who ain’t got a fucking clue they are paying money; or going into debt to attend a fuck honour fuck Ecology of Peace Reality Facts ‘pretend we give a fuck about education’ university:
“Unlike plagues of the dark ages or contemporary diseases we do not yet understand, the modern plague of overpopulation is soluble by means we have discovered and with resources we possess. What is lacking is not sufficient knowledge of the solution but universal consciousness of the gravity of the problem and education of the billions who are its victims. The only way our overpopulation and overconsumption problems can be solved. First the white man and the black man have to be able to sit down at the same table. The white man has to be able to feel free to speak his mind without worrying about hurting the feelings of the negro. The socalled negro has to feel free to speak his mind without worrying about hurting the feelings of the white man. The soldiers have to be able to feel free to speak their minds without worrying about hurting the feelings of the civilians. The civilians have to feel free to speak their minds without hurting the feelings of the soldiers. Then they can bring the EoP v WiP issues that are under the rug out on top of the table and take an intelligent approach to get the problem solved” – EoP Amended: Martin Luther King: Margaret Sanger Human Rights Award Acceptance Speech 1966; Malcolm X: Make it Plain.
“Its very nice to drink milk at an unsegregated lunch counter; but not when there is strontium 90 in it” also reported as “What good does it do me to integrate a lunch counter if the milk I drink there is loaded with strontium 90?” – Martin Luther King
It is not often reported how Franz Fanon observed late in his life, that he had been incorrect in believing that the spiritually insecure colonized “niggers killing niggers on a Saturday night” minds would be liberated by violence on the rotting corpse of the settler.
The only liberation for a spiritually insecure colonized – left or right wing, white or black, rich or poor, Christian or muslim, etc mind; is to confront the root causes – i.e. unfounded and/or inaccurate socio-cultural beliefs – for its ‘fuck honour and fuck ecological reality’ psychological insecurities.
Ecology of Peace Reality Facts: 1. Earth is not flat. 2. Resources are finite. 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict. 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.
In Ecology of Peace ecological and egological literacy terms I would rephrase Martin Luther King as follows:
“Its very nice to drink free milk at an unsegregated university lunch counter; but not when (a) everyone at that lunch counter knows I cheated to be sitting there; and they don’t hold me to the same standards as everyone else at that lunch counter, because they secretly believe that I am inferior and incapable of earning my integration lunchcounter seat honourably, based upon the content of my character; and/or (b) the free milk education is not organically based upon Ecological Factual Reality truth and evidence principles; but loaded with egological and ecologically illiterate strontium 90 Masonic War is Peace bullshit the public relations – pretend we give a fuck about ‘educating students about psychology, economics, theology, history, law, etc; so as to enable our students to go out into the world and solve the problems of apartheid violence, economic inequality; psycho-social resource conflict conformity pressures; climate change, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, corporate and political corruption; nation states standing army or dissident guerrilla army ‘terrorism’ resource war military aggression, racism, Islamism, Nazism, capitalism, communism, etc; resource war violence consequences of resource depletion and resource scarcity; while we do sweet goddamn fuck all about educating our students about the root ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ Masonic War is Peace international law social contract clauses causes of the resource depletion and resource scarcity and resource war violence problems they shall be tasked with solving – flat earth ponzi university academic education.”
— EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 06 Oct: Fees Commission, SA Police.
If an individual is capable and willing to be honest with themselves; regarding who they are; who they want to be; their fears, desires, etc, enabling them to ‘know themselves’:
“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War
Once an individual knows themselves; they are capable of being honest with others and entering into relating experiences that are based upon honest frank relationships; clearly clarifying what they want and what they are capable of giving; to enable honest reciprocity; leading to stronger and more intimate relationships based upon mutual honesty and trust; or enemies who know where they stand with each other.
Better to be slapped with the truth, than kissed with a lie. – Russian Proverb
I love you, and because I love you, I would sooner have you hate me for telling you the truth than adore me for telling you lies. — Pietro Aretino, Catholic Church
Better an honest enemy than a false friend. – German Proverb
An enemy, who is honest and shows his/her hate openly is better than a friend who is liar and putting you down secretly. – Unknown
I’d rather have honest enemies than fake friends. – Unknown
Better to be an honest open sinner, than a false saint – Unknown
Wounds from a sincere friend are better than many kisses from an enemy. – Proverbs 27:6
The ultimate outcome of an individual who led an honest or reasonably honest life; may be an individual with few friends; whose relating experiences are to them at least – priceless – in terms of their honesty and sincerity.
Conversely: if an individual is incapable or unwilling to be honest with themselves, regarding who they are; who they want to be; their fears, desires, etc, their entire identity is their bullshit the public relations marketing image.
“I have called this phenomenon the marketing character because it is based on experiencing yoneself as a commodity, and one’s value not as ‘use value’ but as ‘exchange value’. The living being becomes a commodity on the ‘personality market’. … Success depends largely on how well persons sell themselves on the market, how well they get their personalities across, how nice a ‘package’ they are; whether they are ‘cheerful’, ‘sound’, ‘aggressive’, ‘reliable’, ‘ambitious’; furthermore, what their family backgrounds are, what clubs they belong to, and whether they kinow the ‘right’ people….. must fulfil one conditions: to be in demand. .. The aim of the marketing character is to be desirable under all conditions of the personality market…. The puzzling question why contemporary human beings love to buy and to consume, and yet are so little attached to what they buy, finds its most significant answer in the marketing character phenomenon. The marketing character’s lack of attachment also makes them indifferent to things. What matters is perhaps the prestige or the comfort that things give, but things per se have no substance. They are utterly expendable, along with friends or lovers, who are expendable too, since no ddeper tie exists to any of them.” — Erich Fromm; To Have or to Be.
If they are incapable of being honest with themselves; they are incapable of being honest with others; and consequently are incapable of experiencing honest intimate relating experiences; since all their relating experiences are simply different flavours of class, gender, racial or religious passive aggressive bullshit the public relations marketing coolaid sales. The conscious or subsconscious suppression of their honest emotions, desires and fears desire to leads to depression and/or search for meaning into conscious and/or unconscious addictions: whether to alcohol, drugs, religion, money, sex, etc.
“I .. suggest that this transformational process requires at least one necessary ingredient without which philosophical counseling would not be possible. Whether implicitly or explicitly, both counselor and client need the virtue of courage in its form as “philosophical courage” in order for the counseling to be successful. Moreover, the degree of such courage in both client and counselor will determine the extent to which issues are brought into question…… there is another form of courage—philosophical courage—required of individuals in dealing with their most fundamental beliefs and values. ….. I believe the best way to demarcate roughly the different forms of courage, is through an analysis of the cost involved with each form of the virtue…. First, with physical courage, the possible cost involved, at the extreme, is the physical loss of life…. Second, with moral courage, the possible cost is social rejection and isolation and/or a loss of “ethical integrity or authenticity”. Third, with “psychological courage,” the possible cost perceived by the individual is “psychic death.” …. And fourth, with “philosophical courage” the possible cost is philosophical instability where one’s most fundamental beliefs and values are brought into doubt. … it demands of the individual a confrontation with fundamental beliefs and values”. — The Role of Philosophical Courage in Philosophical Counseling, by Hakam Al-Shawi [PDF]; as quoted in: EoP Clerk to Former EoP Applicant: Francisco Martin [PDF]: 26 Mar 2015: RE: GMC 4643-13: RE: Francisco Martin; Hakam Al-Shawi; CC: RH; RPN; PK; Islamic Scholars.
The ultimate outcome of an individual who led a life addicted to bullshit the public relations image management; would be an individual with hundreds of fake passive aggressive, backstabbing two faced hypocrite’s pretending to be each others friends; whose relating experiences – if they had the courage to be brutally honest with themselves – were a total and utter waste of their time, attention and energy. A wasted life.
“But your real crime has nothing to do with a pimp’s death. Well then? What is it? Yours is the most terrible crime a human being can commit. I accuse you… …of a wasted life. Guilty.” – Papillon based upon the book: Papillon by Henri Charriere.
Consequently the EoP conclusion: The self respect and buck stops here relationship benefit profits of honesty and the costs of 30 pieces of silver self deception bullshit.
— EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 03 Sep: Daniel Cloud .. Canadian Society of Philosophical Practice
From: EoP MILED Clerk <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 1:14 AM
Subject: EoP culture re: Existence and origins of beliefs in God, voting and thinking revolution
To: “Think Progress: Jack Jenkins” <email@example.com>, “Harpers: Christopher R. Beha” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Giles Harvey <email@example.com>
Cc: James Dobson <firstname.lastname@example.org>, James Dobson <email@example.com>, “Family Research Council: Tony Perkins” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Faith Freedom Coalition: Lance Lemmonds” <Lance@ffcoalition.com>, “Christian Coalition: Ohio” <email@example.com>, North Carolina <Chairman@nc-cc.com>, “Liberty Univ: Jerry Falwell Jr” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Angela Rice <email@example.com>, Greg Smith <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Cynthia Schmidt <email@example.com>, “Southern Baptist Theological Seminary: R Albert Mohler” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Living Proof Ministries: Jenn Hamm” <email@example.com>, “Gospel Coalition: Collin Hansen” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Catholic Vote <email@example.com>, Tiffany Sawyer <Tiffany.Sawyer@harpercollins.com>, Brittany Lassiter <Brittany.Lassiter@harpercollins.com>, Suzanne Wickham <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Joe Ward <email@example.com>, Breach Repairers <firstname.lastname@example.org>, North Carolina NAACP <email@example.com>, “Center for Action Contemplation: Richard Rohr” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Sojourners: Jim Wallis” <email@example.com>, James Simpson <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “UPhoenix: PhWayne Grudem” <email@example.com>, “AuburnU: Paul Raushenbush” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “FtWorthU: Wil Gafney” <email@example.com>, “UPenn: Religious Studies: Anthea Butler” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “UBaylor: Alan Jacobs” <Alan_Jacobs@baylor.edu>, “WheatonC: Ed Stetzer” <email@example.com>, Evangelism <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Noah Toly <Noah.Toly@wheaton.edu>
Think Progress & Harpers:
Think Progress: Jack Jenkins (email@example.com); Harpers: Christopher R. Beha (firstname.lastname@example.org); Giles Harvey (email@example.com)
Evangelical Christian Pastors and Scholars:
James Dobson (firstname.lastname@example.org); James Dobson (email@example.com); Family Research Council: Tony Perkins (firstname.lastname@example.org); Faith Freedom Coalition: Ralph Reed via Lance Lemmonds (Lance@ffcoalition.com); Christian Coalition: Roberta Combs via Ohio (email@example.com); North Carolina (Chairman@nc-cc.com); Liberty Univ: Jerry Falwell Jr. (firstname.lastname@example.org); Angela Rice (email@example.com); Greg Smith (firstname.lastname@example.org); Cynthia Schmidt (email@example.com); Southern Baptist Theological Seminary: R Albert Mohler (firstname.lastname@example.org); Living Proof Ministries: Beth Moore via Jenn Hamm (email@example.com); Gospel Coalition: Collin Hansen (firstname.lastname@example.org); Catholic Vote (email@example.com); Rachel Held Evans via Tiffany Sawyer (Tiffany.Sawyer@harpercollins.com); Brittany Lassiter (Brittany.Lassiter@harpercollins.com); Diana Butler Bass via Suzanne Wickham (firstname.lastname@example.org); Rev Dr William J Barber via Joe Ward (email@example.com); Breach Repairers (firstname.lastname@example.org); North Carolina NAACP (email@example.com); Center for Action Contemplation: Richard Rohr (firstname.lastname@example.org); Sojourners: Jim Wallis (email@example.com); James Simpson (firstname.lastname@example.org); UPhoenix: PhWayne Grudem (email@example.com); AuburnU: Paul Raushenbush (firstname.lastname@example.org); FtWorthU: Wil Gafney (email@example.com); UPenn: Religious Studies: Anthea Butler (firstname.lastname@example.org); UBaylor: Alan Jacobs (Alan_Jacobs@baylor.edu); WheatonC: Ed Stetzer (email@example.com); Evangelism (firstname.lastname@example.org); Noah Toly (Noah.Toly@wheaton.edu); Weekly Standard: Virginia Hume @virginiahume. Think Progress: Jack Jenkins @thinkprogress. Mike Huckabee: @GovMikeHuckabee. NBC: Alex Johnson @MAlexJohnson
EoP culture re: Existence and origins of beliefs in God, voting and thinking revolution
Re: Weekly Standard: Does God Want Us to Vote For Trump? NBC: What’s Behind Evangelical Support for Donald Trump? Less Than You Think. Think Progress: A list of faith leaders calling out the Religious Right for failing to abandon Trump. Mike Huckabee: Pence Shocked by Supporters Revolution Promise if Trump loses Election. Albert Mohler Thinking in Public: What Became of the Christian Intellectuals? A Conversation with Prof Alan Jacobs.
“Turns out God is an old-style politico. “Those independent bids never work. Gotta suck it up,” He says, maybe in a Boston or Chicago accent. The only option God sees is supporting the political equivalent of putting something in the microwave just to see what happens. Sorry, but that’s not what God tells me. God tells me that sometimes you have to walk away. If the fight asks too much of you, and victory might ask still more, then you accept defeat. God tells me there can even be grace in that. And that having relinquished evil on your own side, you are better positioned to fight it on the other.” – Virginia Hume.
“Personal integrity is very important,” especially for minority and younger evangelicals, he said. “The Republican Party can no longer count on the habit of evangelicals’ voting for the party’s nominee for president. It’s going to have to be earned, and it’s going to have to be earned through character.” – Albert Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.
“In bourgeois terms it was a war between the Allies and Germany. In Bolshevik terms it was a war between the Allied and the German upper classes. And, which of them won was a matter of indifference. I was ordered by the Party to enlist. I gave my name as Petrov. They were shouting for victory all over Europe, praying for victory, to the same God. My task, the Party’s task, was to organize defeat. From defeat would spring the Revolution. And, the Revolution would be victory for us. The Party looked to the conscript business; most of them wearing their first good pair of boots. When the boots wore out, they’d be ready to listen. … But, for the moment, there was nothing to be done. There were too many volunteers like me. Mostly, it was mere hysteria. But there were men with better motives, men who saw the times were critical, and wanted a man’s part. Good men, wasted. Unhappy men, too. Unhappy In their jobs. Unhappy with their wives. Doubting themselves. Happy men don’t volunteer. They wait their turn and thank God if their age, or work, delays it. The ones who got back home with the price of an arm or an eye or a leg, these were the lucky ones. Even Comrade Lenin underestimated both the anguish of that 900- mile- long front, and our cursed capacity for suffering. By the second winter of the war, the boots had worn out, but the line still held. Their great coats fell to pieces on their backs. Their rations were irregular. Half of them went into action without arms, led by men they dldn’t trust. ….. At last they did what all the armies dreamed of doing: They began to go home. That was the beginning of the Revolution.” – Yevgraf Zhivago; Dr. Zhivago: The Revolution.
“There’s been a lot of talk about Abraham Lincoln; but the President we need today is not Abraham Lincoln. The President we need today is Thomas Jefferson. He said that we needed a revolution every generation. Thomas Jefferson said you have to be ready in order to preserve the vitality of your liberty and your freedom, to defend it; not by overthrowing anything else except for what you’ve been holding in your head that may not be applicable anymore. We’ve gotten very lazy, we’re many generations overdue for a revolution in our thinking. I’m not talking about blood and violence; although I am afraid that is already happening. I am talking about a revolution that is probably the hardest kind; the one that takes place inside the human soul and human mind. To be able to tear everything down and start with a completely fresh piece of paper and say ‘okay, how do we solve this problem?'” — Michael Ruppert; Collapse: The End of the Age of Oil.
“This tragic [— environmental collapse — at the end of which we are left without a home, having rendered Earth (our home planet) uninhabitable] outcome may not be unavoidable. And if it is not unavoidable, then that’s about the only problem left that’s worth solving. The solution can be almost arbitrarily expensive in both life and treasure. I would humbly suggest that it’s worth all the money in the world, plus a few billion lives, because if a solution isn’t found, then that treasure and those lives are forfeit anyway.” – Dmitry Orlov; Sixth Stage of Collapse. [SS Copy]
Ecology of Peace Ethics:
I am a member of an Ecology of Peace culture. I do not profess to be an expert on ethics or philosophy. I’d like to think I have some bit of common sense. I don’t know if God or the Devil, do or don’t exist.
To me ethics is the sincere commitment to resolve social and resource war conflict by being willing to (i) confront the root causes of social and resource conflict and engage in nonviolent problem solving focused cooperate discussion and action; (ii) by engaging with others in fully informed consenting agreements; and amending my lifestyle or values; should they have been a contributory causal factor to the creation of social and resource war conflict.
Ecology of Peace culture ethics is founded upon Ecology of Peace Factual Reality principles:
 The Earth is not flat.
 Resources are finite.
 When humans breed and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; this results in overpopulation and overconsumption which results in resource depletion and resource conflict.
 Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
 The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is man’s law that says citizens have the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity’; which are manmade law clauses of the Masonic War is Peaceinternational law social contract’.
 If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peaceinternational law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.
Put simply in Ecology of Peace cultural perspective: an ethical person is someone who (a) procreates and consumes below ecological carrying capacity limits; thereby not contributing to overpopulation/consumption resource scarcity social conflict; and (b) relates to others based upon fully informed consenting agreement values.
Clarification regarding terms ‘religion’ and ‘civilized patriarchy’:
Definition of Religion: Group-Shared System of Thought and Action that Offers the Individual a Frame of Orientation and an Object of Devotion:
“To clarify, “religion” as I use it here does not refer to a system that has necessarily to do with a concept of God or with idols or even to a system perceived as religion, but to any group-shared system of thought and action that offers the individual a frame of orientation and an object of devotion. Indeed, in this broad sense of the world no culture of the past or present, and it seems no culture in the future, can be considered as not having religion.
This definition does not tell us anything about its specific content. People may worship animals, trees, idols of gold or stone, an invisible god, a saintly person, or a diabolical leader; they may worship their ancestors, their nation, their class or party, money or success. Their religion may be conducive to the development of destructiveness or of love, of domination or of solidarity; it may further their power of reason or paralyze it.
.. A specific religion, provided it is effective in motivating conduct, is not a sum total of doctrines and beliefs; it is rooted in a specific character structure of the individual and, inasmuch as it is the religion of a group, in the social character. Thus, our religious attitude may be considered an aspect of our character structure, for we are what we are devoted to, and what we are devoted to is what motivates our conduct. Often however, individuals are not even aware of the real objects of their personal devotion and mistake their “official” beliefs for their real, though secret religion. If, for instance, a man worships power while professing a religion of love, the religion of power is his secret religion, while his so-called official religion, for example Christianity, is only an ideology.” – Erich Fromm, To Have or to Be, pp.135-136
Civilized Insecure Masculinity Patriarchy’s Breeding / Consumption War Frame of Orientation and Objects of Devotion:
Civilized Insecure Masculinity Patriarchy (pa·tri·arch·y):
A system of society or government, is Insecure Masculinity Patriarchal to the extent that it regulates (a) the relations between humans, nature and other animals species and (b) the relations between humans amongst themselves, in terms of their gender, culture, ethnic, religious and ideological conflicts; for the (c) almost exclusive benefit of violent Anthropocentric humans and corporations.
Consequently a legal, political or social system is Insecure Masculinity Patriarchal to the extent of its (a) failure to provide automatic equal legal personhood and rights to women, nature and animal and plant species; (b) disregard for the objective and scientific breed and consume below carrying capacity truth of the laws of nature/ecology; and (c) disregard for socio-cultural legal foundation enabling relationships based upon fully informed consent; when they contradict the AnthroCorpocentric profiteering from – breeding and consumption war – objectives.
A society has violent Insecure Masculinity Patriarchal breeding and consumption war objectives, to the extent that:
* its socio-political status symbols involve breeding war, consumption war and violent warrior mythology: (a) breeding war procreation above carrying capacity: i.e. cultures that reward their male members with concepts of manhood virility status, which are based on the man breeding a family above carrying capacity levels; (b) consumption war consuming above carrying capacity; i.e. cultures that reward their male members with concepts of manhood intelligence/virility status, which are based upon the man consuming above carrying capacity levels, to demonstrate his ‘large consumption penis’; (c) warrior mythology, where violent men are rewarded with ‘freedom fighter’ or ‘soldier’ socio-political status symbol medals and awards; particularly if the warrior mythology censors and ignores information to educate the culture’s members, that scarcity induced resource war violence can be avoided by the culture’s members choosing to breed and consume below carrying capacity levels.
A culture which teaches a purely defensive warrior mythology; i.e. based purely on defense of its landbase and resources, i.e. which educate the members of the culture to avoid overpopulation and overconsumption scarcity inducing lifestyle’s within its culture, and hence does not engage in Insecure Masculinity patriarchal breeding and consumption war objectives would be considered a secure masculinity patriarchal / matriarchal or gender neutral culture.
* Its religious, political and corporate leaders (a) endorse patriarchal objectification and sexualized concepts of ‘beauty’, which demean and vilify all women who do not meet those ‘beauty’ requirements; where a woman’s value is not based on her honesty, character and integrity, but upon how well she is able to market and trade her sexuality for physical and economic safety and security, and (b) avoid addressing the overpopulation and overconsumption scarcity induced root causes of most direct and indirect causes of conflict: from murder, rape, suicide, homeless, unemployment, courts, police, prisons, mental illness, mental institutions, because cumulatively they serve as socio-political conflict pressure cookers to socio-psychologically pressure women to (i) purchase safety and security by trading sexual favours from men, for physical and economic safety and security; (ii) conform to civilized patriarchy’s expectation that she behave as her partners brood sow and/or sexual socio-economic status symbol bimbo accessory, to breed/consume above carrying capacity, to thereby (iii) aggravate scarcity induced violence, particularly against lower class men and women; for the socio-political or economic profits of the elite.
Ecology of Peace Reality: Existence of God; if so: God of Peace or War?
I don’t care whether anyone worships God, Allah, Buddha, Satan, their ancestors, the spaghetti monster; or their own ego; I have simply observed that:
Presumably if God (a) exists; and (b) created the Earth; s/he would know what I refer to as Ecology of Peace Reality Facts; namely that:
- the Earth s/he made is not flat and the resources are finite;
- When humans breed and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; this results in overpopulation and overconsumption which results in resource depletion and resource conflict.
- Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
- The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is man’s law that says citizens have the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity’; which are manmade law clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract’.
- If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to sustainably protect and conserve natural resources.
If God further was a God of Peace; or thought some of his children may be interested in being members of religions of peace; s/he would:
- Order his/her prophets / spokespersons to educate his/her children to confront Ecology of Peace Reality Facts.
- Yet I am unaware of any individuals who state that (a) God exists; and (b) created the Earth; (c) that their God and religion is a religion of peace; who are educating their flock of Gods children to confront Ecology of Peace Reality Facts; and cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract.
So what does that mean? Either:
- They are lying about God existing; or creating the earth or that God is a God of Peace; and/or
- They are lying about being Gods chosen spokespersons or interpreters of his God of Peace laws; and/or
- They are not listening to God’s orders to educate his children that he is a God of Peace and how they can coexist and live in peace together; because they personally are Men or Women of War; pretending they worship a God of Peace?
Messages from God Theories
The only scientist I am aware of; who was interested in attempting to scientifically verify whether God exists; was John Nash.
In the documentary A Brilliant Madness: A Mathematical Genius Descent into Madness; John Nash talks about how he attempted to mathematically calculate the probability of the existence of God; by attempting to determine the ‘normal’ probability for any coincidence event to occur; and if or where any highly improbable coincidence event occurred; which was not man-made; considering whether highly improbable coincidence events could be messages from God.
Erhan Cinlar: “From time to time you would see in your office, you know under the door a huge number of sheets that has been worked out the night before computing the probabilities of certain coincidences. Very detailed computations. He was attempting to prove the existence of God.”
John Nash: “I felt I might get a divine revelation that seeing a certain number of [above normal] coincidences; could be interpreted as a message from Heaven.”
My working hypothesis is that if or where there are abnormal coincidences related to some event; the most probable source to consider as the possible source of such abnormal coincidences would be military intelligence agencies. In my personal opinion: in an age where military agencies have access to technology that includes mind reading and manipulating the thoughts, behaviors and actions of individuals, animals, the weather; etc; if or where any individual perceives any event with an above normal number of highly improbable coincidence’s; it would have to be verified that such improbable coincidence was not the result of (a) military agencies using military technology to manipulate events; (ii) extraterrestrial beings using extraterrestrial technology to manipulate events; before (c) any consideration could be given to whether it could be a message from God.
Beauty & Problem Solving Cooperation Theories:
In A Beautiful Mind and A Brilliant Madness; the Nash Equilibrium theory is described as a mathematical principle of cooperation. The principle of cooperation to implement an Ecology of Peace international law as opposed to competition over resources is based thereon. Put simply: That in any conflict; those who cooperate to share resources and resolve the root causes of the conflict; would have a better chance of success and winning the fight; than those who say ‘the strongest’ shall win all the resources; and have the right to enslave the weakest.
They are sitting in a bar and in walks a beautiful blond Aryan woman; and they all start getting ready to fight each other to take her on a date; and John Nash laughs and tells them: Why fight about the few women you consider to be physically beautiful in appearance; instead of redefining beauty and cooperating to help all women to become beautiful in character. If you fight for a few physically beautiful women; only a few men will win a beautiful woman; if you redefine beauty in terms of character; you can then cooperate to help all women to grow beautiful characters; then every man in the process helps his own character; and goes home with a beautiful woman.
Similarly if humans cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; then all the energy that is currently wasted by individuals, religions and races to fight over resources will no longer need to be wasted on resources; and humans will have more time and resources to investigate ideas such as whether God does or does not exist; or any other issue of concern they are interested in investigating to seek the truth about reality; but currently cannot do so; because they are just joining one or other religion for ethnic or religious tribal resource war purposes; in their Planet of the Apes fight for survival.
Imagine if Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin had invited Mao Tse-tun, Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Neville Chamberlain to meet and discuss options for pooling their military resources to pressure the international legal community to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; for the benefit of all individuals from all races, classes and religions interested in Ecology of Peace responsible freedom?
Since I don’t if there is a God or not; I don’t ask him or her whom I should or should not vote for; who the enemy is; what his pussy grabbing justifications are; and whether humans procreating and consuming in violation of ecological carrying capacity limits are reasonably equivalent to ships violating lighthouse warnings.
WiP Americans: “THIS IS THE AIRCRAFT CARRIER USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN, THE SECOND LARGEST SHIP IN THE UNITED STATES’ ATLANTIC FLEET. WE ARE ACCOMPANIED BY THREE DESTROYERS, THREE CRUISERS AND NUMEROUS SUPPORT VESSELS. I DEMAND THAT YOU CHANGE YOUR COURSE 15 DEGREES NORTH. THAT’S ONE-FIVE DEGREES NORTH, OR COUNTER MEASURES WILL BE UNDERTAKEN TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF THIS SHIP.” EoP Applicants: “This is a lighthouse. Your call.”
— EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 08 Oct: Mayak Intelligence.
When it comes to the enemy; I am inclined to agree with Amarylla Fox: that the enemy is a policy that needs to be abolished: more specifically: the right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits Masonic War is Peace clauses of the international law social contract, needs to be abolished and replaced with Ecology of Peace clauses that require all of the worlds citizens of all races, religions, classes to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; and that intentional violators thereof are eliminated from the planetary genepool; as detailed in among others Ecology of Peace Wealth Transfer Option and EoP Axis Military Necessity Coercion Evacuation measures.
I don’t know what is on the top of other people’s military necessity lists. Presumably the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract is on the top of many Generals and Admirals military necessity lists [PDF: 23 Jan 2016]. If they don’t have enough Generals and Admirals to implement EoP Axis Military Necessity Coercion Evacuation; those who believe in God/Allah/Jahweh/Buddha/Satan better be doing some ‘God Help Us All’; as they give the planet’s Prosecutors, non-cooperating military elite, lily white guilt liberals – who don’t understand the passive aggressive obstruction to the honourable winning hearts and minds implementation of an Ecology of Peace cultural schmuck reality – some rectal-hummus hydration interrogation.
‘God Help Us All’ considerations for the God/Allah/Jahweh/Buddha/Satan believers:
To the Pope’s, Cardinals, Pastors, Friars, Priests, Deacons, Ayatollahs’ Imam’s, Witches interpreters of God / Allah / Buddha’s / Satan’s etc words:
When do you intend to ask your God / Allah / Buddha / Satan boss; whether he knows that the earth he made is flat or not?
If your God / Allah / Buddha / Satan boss knows that the earth he made is not flat; but round and with finite resources: when does that God / Allah / Buddha / Satan boss of yours intend to inform you his prophet spokesperson?
If your God / Allah / Buddha / Satan Boss knows that the earth he made is not flat; but round and with finite resources; and your God / Allah / Buddha / Satan is a God / Allah / Buddha / Satan is a God of peace: When does your God / Allah / Buddha / Satan boss intend to order you to order his children of peace flock; to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract?
If alternatively your God / Allah / Buddha / Satan Boss is a God / Allah / Buddha / Satan of War; when is your God / Allah / Buddha / Satan Boss going to order you his Interpreter prophets to order you to register your religion as a Religion of War with the relevant State authorities?
— EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations: 04 Apr: Jus Sanguinis.
“The plate tectonics of all of these forces crushing against each other spinning off all kinds of radical cancer cells which are popping up in Orlando and San Bernadino and Paris and Brussels and nobody’s done anything to the primary tumour sites; and until we do that, the metastisis of problems are going to grow worse and worse. [Why haven’t we done anything] Ultimately warfare is a battle of wills; and it is not just what happens kinetically on the battlefield; it is what happens in the communications and propaganda and belief space and … moral leadership first, backed up by kinetic capability on the battlefield, we also have a very bureaucratized military; we have allowed lawyers to really become what political officers were in the Soviet Union, that are constantly undermine, second guessing and limiting the freedom of maneuver and decision-making by our battlefield commanders; so its made for a very risk averse military thats entirely too expensive. So a combination of a lack of will and a lack of effective tools in the toolbox. So there is definitely some cleanup work to do. I don’t think its that hard to do, if you have a leader that will make clear decisions and make things happen. … Well I talked to you earlier about the Caliphate having ended when Attaturk took over and the secularization of Turkey occurred.” — Erik Prince; Breitbart: Blackwater Founder Erik Prince: Obama ‘Tilting Toward Islamist or Muslim Brotherhood Approach to Foreign Policy’.
“Do you want to cooperate to do something to the primary tumour ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ Masonic War is Peace clauses of intenational law tumour sites or not?” – EoP Acting Clerk correspondence to Erik Prince: Adult Decision-making: Pro EoP Applicant or Pro WiP American? CC: Breitbart.
“I wrote no defense of Eichmann. But I did try to reconcile the shocking mediocrity of the man with his staggering deeds. Trying to understand is not the same as forgiveness. I see it as my responsibility to understand. It is the responsibility of anyone who dares to put pen to paper on the subject. Since Socrates and Plato, we usually call thinking “to be engaged in that silent dialogue between me and myself.” In refusing to be a person, Eichmann utterly surrendered that single most defining human quality: that of being able to think. And consequently, he was no longer capable of making moral judgments. This inability to think created the possibility for many ordinary men to commit evil deeds on a gigantic scale, the like of which one had never seen before. It is true. I have considered these questions in a philosophical way. The manifestation of the wind of thought is not knowledge, but the ability to tell right from wrong, beautiful from ugly. And I hope that thinking gives people the strength to prevent catastrophes in these rare moments when the chips are down.” — Hannah Arendt’s Final Speech
Working Hypothesis theory vs Principles of Belief:
According to Professor of Philosophy Dr. Gedaliah Braun’s Some Important Concepts in Ethics; the two basic Principles of Belief are:
B1: Whatever a person believes, s/he necessarily believes is true.
B2: From the fact that someone (no matter who or how many) believes something, it never follows that that belief is true.
In other words, believing something does not necessarily make the particular belief to be objectively factually true.
The point being that if you believe some idea with certainty; then necessarily you believe that that belief about that idea is true and hence any contrary belief is false.
Conversely if you consider any idea or concept to be a working hypothesis theory; you then proceed to investigate it through enquiry and research to determine whether the working hypothesis theory is substantiated by evidence; i.e. plausibly true; or contradicted by evidence; i.e. plausibly untrue.
For example: The statement “At one time everyone believed that the earth was flat” is not simply a statement about the shape of the earth; but about people’s beliefs about the shape of the earth. A statement (or fact) about people’s beliefs about the shape of the earth is quite different from a statement (or fact) about the actual shape of the earth.
In order to determine the truth or falsity of the statement “At one time everyone believed that the earth was flat”; we must conduct historical, sociological and anthropological type research to determine what people believe about the shape of the earth.
However in order to determine the truth or falsity of the statement “The earth is flat (or at one time was flat)”; what people believe(d) about the shape of the earth is quite irrelevant. To determine whether or not the earth is or was flat; we must make certain physical and scientific observations and research to determine the factual truth about the former and current shape of the earth.
Summary Hypothesis: Ecology of Peace & War is Peace history:
Since the beginning of humans (whatever you believe that beginning to be) humans lived in nomadic hunter gatherer tribes, like the Bushmen, Aborigine’s, etc. Male duties were to hunt and protect the tribe. Women’s duties were to forage and nurture the young. Both men and women contributed to the tribe’s economic resources and duties, hence power was shared reasonably equally. Tribes were concerned about not overbreeding; since such overbreeding resulted in the resources in a territory being depleted quicker, and less resources for the rest of the tribe; requiring them to move to new territories. After three million years of humans living like hunter gatherers, it is estimated that the human population at the beginning of the Neolithic period was around ten million. This period of humans living in harmony with nature would be the story of the Garden of Eden; and the story of Cain and Abel.
Then things changed very quickly for the tribes who invented totalitarian agriculture. Women invented agriculture, resulting from their close association and experimentation with seeds and plants, in their role as foragers. This change occurred because some tribes started practicing a particular form of ‘surplus agriculture’ (hereinafter referred to as ‘totalitarian agriculture’) where farmers grew large surpluses of stored food.
The consolidation of agriculture results in the centralization of political power: cities & civilization. Before the discovery of oil and coal, the practice of totalitarian agriculture farming was far more labour intensive than hunting and subsistence farming; so men took over agriculture; and women were now relegated to being brood sows, to breed economic and cannon fodder: children to work in the fields or be soldiers. Surplus food meant that some members of the tribe could now work in other specialized fields: soldiers, clerks, etc; and also that the tribes could grow their tribes population. World population doubled in three thousand years; and again in only two thousand years. It jumped from ten million to fifty million—probably eighty percent of them being practitioners of totalitarian agriculture. It was getting crowded. [ Sources: Guns, Germs & Steel | Eve’s Seed: Religious Ecological Illiteracy | Story of B | Agriculture & Civilization | City & Civilizations | Totalitarian agriculture | Human Factory Farming: Story of our Enslavement]
EoP interpretation of Bible: Adam and Eve’s apple story represents Eve teaching Adam occult ‘sexual breeding war and capital resource accumulation war’ knowledge. In occult Gnostic teaching the sickle symbolizes Saturn, or the Demiurgos, their operating engineer of the universe; or the Mason’s civilization God Architect. The sickle’s symbology involves the deliberate manipulation of nature through farming practices to produce surpluses for the ego sociopolitical or economic profits status of man. The farming of plants quickly evolved to the farming of humans; the process of deliberately encouraging overbreeding to increase socio-political or economic status profits from direct or indirect — debt or welfare dependency — slavery. The harvesting of plants quickly evolved to the harvesting of humans; through human sacrifice.
Beginning of War is Peace War resulting from overbreeding and overconsuming:
In all of three million years, humans had never been crowded anywhere. But now the people of practicing totalitarian agriculture were learning what it means to be crowded. Overworked, overgrazed land was becoming less and less productive. There were more people, and they were competing for dwindling resources; and people now began to organize their tribes into forms of standing armies to fight for land or resources. The tribes first war-making machinery: warlords—kings, princes, emperors and their nation states formed for the purpose of armed defense and aggression. “It’s during this period that we see the standing army forged as the monarch’s sword of power. Without a standing army, a king is just a windbag in fancy clothes. But with a standing army, a king can impose his will on his enemies and engrave his name in history—and absolutely the only names we have from this era are the names of conquering kings. No scientists, no philosophers, no historians, no prophets, just conquerors. For the first time in human history, the important people are the people with armies.”
Evolution of War is Peace War: Advancement and acquisition of Human and Military Technology and Capital vs Breeding of Cannon Fodder:
In a battle between two armies with the same level of military skill and technology; generally the bigger army wins. Many of history’s military conquerors have relied on simply growing cannon fodder to slaughter on the battlefields to win their battles or wars. Some military conquerors focused on improving their soldiers skills (psychological, physical, intellectual, spiritual, etc) and technology (better armor, better swords, better chariots, better bows and arrows, better scaling machines, better rams, better artillery, better guns, better tanks, better planes, better bombs, better rockets, better nerve gas, better germs, better chemicals) .
WiP Resource Conflict: Initially economic, then political, and finally military organized conflict.
Centuries of conflict over resources generated an international law social contract founded upon Masonic phallic force (rule of force international treaties); that rewarded those who engage in seething energies of lucifer breeding and consumption wars; which bribe their tribes members to believe it is their ‘inalienable [freedumb slavery] right’ to breed and consume above carrying capacity limits; while denying personal responsibility for the human factory farming organized violence conquer and culling racism, sexism, nationalism, socialism, capitalism, nazism, islamism, zionism, corporatism, stalinism, human sacrifice culling, etc consequences; as people are motivated beyond retardation (motarded) to choose to join one or other ideological, religious, racial or cultural tribe to engage in resource war thieving to accumulate more resources to grow their tribe to enable it to protect itself from another tribes organized violence resource war thieving. [ Seething Energies of Lucifer Occult human sacrifice culling practices | Nazi & Vatican’s occult ‘Final Solution’ Concentration Camps | Bolshevik Final Solution Ukrainian famine ]
Totalitarian Agriculture WiP Empires that violently collapsed:
Humans who engage in totalitarian agriculture, engage in Predator-Prey Growth and Collapse of Civilization/Empire cycles: Greco-Rome, Minoan, Mycenaean, Sumerians, Akkadian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Achaemenid, Seleucid, Zhou, Han, Tang, Song, Parthian, Sassanid, Umayyad, Abbasid, Mauryan, Gupta, Maya, Hittite, Harrapan and Teotihuacan. Collapses result from (1) Ecological Strain and (2) Economic Stratification and have included the disappearance of between 90-99% of their populations (from famine, disease and organized violence resource wars) including their kings, Gods, calendars and other complex political and cultural institutions. [ Human And Nature DYnamics (HANDY): Civilization Collapse due to Ecological Strain & Economic Stratification ]
Ecology of Peace (EoP) social contract
Obviously an Ecology of Peace social contract cannot work for just one country; because the other countries who are overbreeding and overconsuming will simply come and conquer the Ecology of Peace country and steal their resources. For an ecology of peace social contract to work, it must be an international social contract.
In nature Keystone Predators maintain Ecological Equilibrium between other predators and their prey: A keystone species — like the Platteau Pika in China, the Black Tailed Prairie Dog in Arizona, Starfish in the Pacific Northwest — act as Supreme Responsible Predators, who stop other lower predators from overbreeding or overconsuming the resources in an ecological system. Keystone Predator-prey systems enhance ecological equilibrium, biodiversity and balance.
For example: A starfish is the top predator upon a community of invertebrates inhabiting tidally inundated rock faces in the Pacific Northwest. The rest of the community included mollusks, barnacles and other invertebrates, for a total of 12 species (not counting microscopic taxa). When the starfish was removed the species were reduced to 11. Soon, an acorn barnacle and a mussel began to occupy virtually all available space, out competing all the other species. Species diversity dropped from more than 12 species to essentially 2. The starfish was a keystone predator, keeping the strongest competitors in check. Although it was a predator, it helped to maintain a greater number of species in the community. Its beneficial impact on species that were weak competitors is an example of an indirect effect.
An Ecology of Peace international law social contract works in the same way. It restricts all human cultures, religions, races, etc to procreating and consuming below regional, national and international carrying capacity limits. It functions as a form of ‘legal /jurisprudence pika / prairie dog / starfish’ Keystone predation, by legally mandating the elimination from the planetary genepool of breeding and consuming predator cheaters, to (a) keep the system stable with regard to human population vis a vis other species and resources; and (b) restricting any one religion, race, or culture from over-predation; by out competing all other species (due to greater access to capital (consumption war predatory benefits) or human cannon fodder (breeding war predatory benefits). [ EoP NWO social contract options ]
Working Hypothesis Summary: Origin of Man’s Belief in God & Devil:
All civilized religions — from Christianity, to Gnosticism, etc — were ‘created’ in the minds of man. Religions occurred subsequent to and as a combined result of (a) man’s invention of language which created the cognitive capacity for abstract conceptual thought and inner dialogue: in a primitive bicameral mind what we may now call the conscious or unconscious ego would have been interpreted by the being as hearing voices from some external being; and (b) mans attempt to comprehend and make sense of the concept of ‘evil’ (aka organized violence), subsequent to man’s invention of agriculture, approximately 10,000 years ago; and where such agriculture created food surpluses, resulting in population surpluses, and expansion of their territory resulting in population pressure clashes with other tribes territories, resource war conflict.
Jaynes’ thesis, baldly stated, is this: human consciousness (which Jaynes defines as self-conscious introspection) only emerged around 3000 years ago. Before that, everyone heard voices and saw visions, which they took as the commands of the gods, and obeyed unquestioningly. These voices or commands came from the right hemisphere of the brain, which ‘bicameral man’ experienced as alien or Other.
Sensing a voice or presence often emerges in stressful situations – anecdotally, it’s relatively common for the dying to see the spirits of dead loved ones, likewise as many as 35% of people who have recently lost a loved one say they have a sense of the departed’s continued presence. Mountaineers in extreme conditions often report a sensed presence guiding them (known as the Third Man Factor).
If there are two or ten people living on an island with enough food and other resources and space, for one hundred people; there is no need to coerce another for food or resources freely and abundantly available. In the absence of a resource scarcity conflict mindset, and plenty of space, the only violence possibly experienced is to avoid being food for an animal predator. On such an island there is no need existential crisis meaning necessity for a ‘God’ in the sky.
Once the tribe introduces agriculture, which results in an agricultural surplus and uses such agricultural surplus to justify greater population; then as the population increases, so the population pressures increase. If nearby tribes also increase populations; there is less space to run away to; when someone in the tribe is temporarily angry, or there is resource scarcity violence.
Consequently my common sense thesis is that Man’s creation of ‘God’ and the ‘Devil’ were a consequence of psychic existential conflict to attempt to understand so-called ‘evil’; or put more simply: the organized violence conflict resulting from population pressures and escalating relations with fellow humans based upon the absence of consent, i.e. extended periods of psychic and physical violence and coercion.
Evil is generally defined as profoundly immoral and wicked, with synonyms: bad, wrong, morally wrong, wrongful, immoral, sinful, ungodly, unholy, foul, vile, base, ignoble, dishonourable, corrupt, iniquitous, depraved, degenerate, villainous, nefarious, sinister, vicious, malicious, malevolent, demonic, devilish, diabolic, diabolical, fiendish, dark, black-hearted.
The word ‘evil’ put in more simple responsible freedom terms:
Libertarians: ‘Any act which I do not want done to me, without my fully informed consent.’
Moral Supremacists: ‘Any Act which I pretend I disagree with so as to be part of some religious, cultural or racial ‘moral supremacy elite club’; either (a) to silence my conscience and feel good about my alleged moral supremacy ‘ethics’ or (b) for social status or economic benefits.
If I don’t like being beaten; then I think anyone of any race, class or religion beating any other person of whatever race, class or religion; who has not consented to being beaten; is ‘evil’; engaged in nonconsensual violence. I don’t only object to someone being beaten; if they are the same race or class or culture as me. If they do not consent to being beaten; I support them not to be beaten. Put simply: I object to all non-consensual violence.
Even if I don’t like being beaten and don’t consent to being beaten; I do not impose my moral beliefs on others; and hence if other people consent to being beaten and beating others up; such as for example engaging in an unofficial fight club or official boxing match; and do so in the privacy of their own homes or a selected private venue with other consenting adults; then its none of my business; that they are doing something that I don’t consent being done to me. Put simply: Two or more adults engaged in consensual violence in a private venue is none of my ethical business.
Moral Supremacists Ethics:
My decision to oppose anyone being beaten has nothing to do with (a) whether I don’t like being beaten or consent to being beaten; but only has to do with (b) my bullshit the public relations image management; to improve my racial, class, religion social status amongst my in-group. Hence I would only object to someone being beaten if they are (a) a member of my race or religion; and (b) they are being beaten by someone of another race or religion.
Whether I secretly like being beaten or don’t like being beaten is irrelevant to my beliefs about whether other people should be (a) beaten without their consent; or (b) engage in fully informed consensual fight club like activities with their consenting adults. I believe I am morally superior to them; and I insist on my moral beliefs about who should be beaten, by whom; irrespective of their own preferences for avoiding being beaten; or choosing to enjoy engaging in violent activities; shall be the law; and shall be enforced upon everyone.
In attempting to understand the existential meaning of this symptom of organized violence ‘evil’ resulting from violation of carrying capacity limits resource war conflict, man created religions.
EoP Updates pending reinstatement of hacked deleted EoP websites.
EoP v WiP negotiations were – and if the hacked and deleted sqswans & tygae weebly EoP account is reinstated; prior to termination of EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations, as a result of Planetary elite’s preference for Masonic War is Peace orgy of violence; will again be – updated at: MILED Clerk Notice.
Pending reinstatement of EoP accounts on Weebly: A copy of this correspondence is documented at: (A) SQSwans PRH: EoP v WiP NWO Neg CC and/or EoP Axis; (B) EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations: Comments Correspondence [PDF]: US Media; Evangelical Christian Pastors and Scholars.
Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk
Notices via Twitter