EoP ADR: Adv Group 621: Jeremy Gauntlett SC
* 27 Oct: Req for Info: Alternative Dispute Resolution; Conflict of Cultures policy.
* Tygae: EoP ADR: J Gauntlett. EoP Leg Sub: LJ v F & T Moe. EoP v WiP NWO Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk <email@example.com>
Date: Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:30 PM
Subject: Req for Info: Alternative Dispute Resolution; Conflict of Cultures policy.
To: Jeremy Gauntlett <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Advocates Group 621 <email@example.com>
Attachments: 16-10-27_Adv621-JGauntlett_A-2578-14.pdf; 16-10-27_Adv621-JGauntlett_B-CCT23-10.pdf;
Advocates Group: Jeremy Gauntlett:
Jeremy Gauntlett (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Advocates Group 621 (email@example.com)
Jeremy Gauntlett & Advocates Group:
Req for Info: Alternative Dispute Resolution; Conflict of Cultures policy.
Summary: This is a request for (i) Alternative Dispute Resolution costs and process; and (ii) Conflict of Cultures: EoP and WiP; or WiP only Arbitrator Dispute Resolution policy; information to Mr. Gauntlett; and/or any advocate in Advocates Group; who is willing to provide the requested information.
Q 1. Alternative Dispute Resolution Costs & Processes:
Do you provide your legal professional skills to resolve disputes; in accordance to alternative dispute resolution procedures? If so: what do you charge; and what is the process of your dispute resolution procedures? For example: must I approach an official licensed ‘alternative dispute resolution’ organization; and request you as the particular arbitrator to resolve the particular dispute; or can I request you to provide alternative dispute resolution procedures directly to me and the disputing party; if he and/or his council agree to accept you as the arbitrator of our dispute?
Q 2. Conflict of Cultures: EoP and WiP; or WiP Only Arbitrator Dispute Resolution policy:
Our issues in dispute include numerous conflict of cultural values. Consequently my question:
If you are willing to provide alternative dispute resolution arbitration proceedings; could you clarify whether your juridical arbitration socio-cultural decision-making in a case involving individuals from different culture’s is monocultural or multicultural; in this case EoP and WiP; or WiP only. EoP refers to Ecology of Peace. WiP refers to Masonic War is Peace.
A ‘Conflict of Cultures’ court or arbitrator would consider culturally based evidence from any individual whatever their culture; even if none of the courts judges or arbitrators were members of one or both of the parties cultures; in order to reach a win-win compromise. A Monoculture court will consider only culturally based evidence from a particular culture; which could be racial, religious, class or ideological.
In this case an EoP and WiP court or arbitrator would consider both EoP and WiP cultural evidence; even if none of the courts judges or arbitrators were members of one or both of the parties cultures. A WiP only court would consider only WiP cultural evidence; denying access to the court’s arbitration proceedings, from individuals who are not members of a WiP culture.
Some Magistrates — Essel, Torlage and Buhr – were willing to consider the EoP scientific based cultural arguments and evidence I submitted to their courts; to a limited extent; in their civil and/or criminal court proceedings that I was involved in. Other juridical officials — Magistrates Fortuin, Meyer et al and Prosecutors Redelinghuys, Sipoyo and Kortje — were not willing to consider EoP scientific based cultural arguments to their criminal court proceedings courts. Justice Ngcobo’s Concourt accepted EoP scientific based culture evidence arguments; and Justice Mogoeng has not been willing to consider EoP scientific based cultural arguments to his Concourt.
Pro Se: GMC 2578-14: Lara Johnstone v Frode Moe
If Required; more detailed information:
Here follows more detailed information if you so require; in order to make a more fully informed decision.
Summary of GMC 2578-14: Lara Johnstone v Frode & Talitha Moe
I filed an application to the George Magistrate’s Court requesting Mr. Moe to (a) apologize and withdraw his mental disorder allegations; or (b) provide the court with his scientific based legal definition of ‘mental disorder’ and evidence in support thereof. He hired Millers Inc, who alleged the Magistrates Court lacked jurisdiction. The Magistrate ruled that his ruling of ‘lacking jurisdiction’ was based upon Sec 46 of the Magistrates Courts Act, 32 of 1944, which states that the court has no jurisdiction in matters in which specific performance without the alternative of payment of damages is sought. [A.pp.49]
Millers Inc. refused to attempt to negotiate to resolve the issues; and refused to accept further email correspondence on the matter; because they said it was ‘spam’. They did not provide their legal definition of spam; so I don’t know what they meant by spam.
I subsequent requested permission to file an Amended Notice of Motion that would include the alternative of payment of damages [A.pp.39-141]; which included copies of my repeated correspondence to Frode to attempt to resolve the matters out of court ; which included: B.28: Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 3:03 PM: Subject: RE: GMC 2578-14: LJohnstone v F Moe et al: Lara cultural membership info.
The Magistrate instructed the Clerk of the Court to inform me that I “need to institute an action to sue for damages, that means issuing a summons.” [A.pp.38] I informed Mr. Moe that I would be drawing up the documents to issue a summons.
Mr. Moe responded enquiring whether I would be willing to settle the matter out of court. [A.pp.06-35: Correspondence: 16-27 Oct 2016]
Concourt Conflict of Cultures: EoP and WiP; or WiP Only Arbitrator Dispute Resolution:
EoP and WiP: In CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride; Justice Ngcobo’s Concourt approved me to file an Amicus to the Court based upon my cultural values legal perspective that South Africa’s TRC was a fraud [B.pp.02-67]. None of the other parties would touch the arguments or evidence for the TRC’s Fraud with a barge-pole; and the media reported on all the contents of all the other briefs filed, but not mine; consequently very few people are aware of the fact that Justice Ngcobo’s Concourt accepted an Amicus filed to proceedings before it; that argued that South Africa’s TRC was a fraud; as a result of its failure to consider the overpopulation and consumption factors as causal factors of resource violence, manifesting as racially motivated political terrorism violence.
WiP only: In an application — CCT ?-12: Alien v Afriforum et al — I filed with Justice Mogoeng’s Concourt pointing out that the so-called ‘kill the boer’ agreement between Afriforum and Julius Malema — like the TRC process and TRC based constitution — did not address the root causes of the resource war conflict; and consequently was like applying a bandaid to a braintumour; the Clerk of the Court refused to accept my application. I filed an appeal clarifying my EoP cultural values to Justice Mogoeng; which he refused to consider or provide a response to.
CAS 572-2002: State v Johnstone: Suicide of Regional Magistrate Buhr:
Current working hypothesis conclusion indicates that the following events were at least partially psychotronically – see for example: Dr John Hall: Government mind control technologies; Dr. Nick Begich: Angels Don’t Play this HAARP – manipulated by one or more military intelligence agencies:
Regional Magistrate Buhr who acted as State Arbitrator CAS 572-2002: State v Lara Johnstone; the criminal trial for my 18 June 2002 bomb threat made to the George Airport; via the George Herald; committed suicide at his home in Great Brak last week. My CAS 572-2002 military necessity arguments were to provide the court with US and Russian Government evidence – as documented by Dr. Len Horowits and Boyd Graves in their respective books: Emerging Viruses: Aids and Ebola: Nature, Accident or Intentional; and State Origin: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS; in collaborating to create the AIDS virus; to educate citizens about the covert depopulation measures implemented by militaries around the world – in this case Military Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS biological warfare – resulting from civilians refusal to wake up and cooperate to address the root causes of overpopulation and overconsumption colliding with declining resources racial, religious and class resource warfare.
There were also two earthquakes in the Garden Route last week.
“Mother Nature is going to bring Galileo’s finite resources reality home to the majority of the planet; in a far more forceful way, than mother nature has recently given Haiti, Chile and Northern Japan a shudder group hug.”
— Andrea Muhrrteyn comment to an Amerika article; sent to me a few weeks ago by a Meyerton disbarred labour lawyer named George Jonker; accusing me of sending out a Luciferian memo to high school students. The memo sent to high school students were also sent to Fees Must Fall & SA University Vice Chancellors and SRC’s & the Fees Commission.
Magistrate Buhr was found dead in his garden; just like Omar Nayef Zayed PLO terrorist hiding in Palestinian Embassy in Sofia, Bulgaria was found dead in Embassy gardens; as ref’d in this recent EoP infographic: 16-09-04_Tiergartenstrasse-StanMcChrystalGardeners [Info].
Summary of Ecology of Peace Factual Reality Principles:
Ecology of Peace Factual Reality:
1. Earth is not flat. 2. Resources are finite. 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletionand resource conflict. 4. Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: poverty, slavery, unemployment,food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc. 5. The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract. 6. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with Ecology of Peace clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.
The following is an amend excerpt from EoP v WiP New World Order negotiations correspondence; and/or from the MILED Clerk Notice updates info page; detailing a brief history of Masonic War is Peace (WiP) history; and our current EoP or WiP New World Order Reality future.
War is Peace (WiP) history:
Religious and political ‘peace’ leaders ignored Ecology of Peace Facts; choosing instead to bribe their tribes members to believe it is their ‘inalienable [freedumb slavery] right’ to breed and consume above carrying capacity limits; as they embark on the totalitarian agriculture motivated beyond retardation (motarded) ratrace to choose to join one or other ideological, religious, racial or cultural tribe to engage in resource war thieving to accumulate more resources to grow their tribe to enable it to protect itself from another tribes organized violence resource war thieving, and/or;
Anti-war Ecology of Peace religious and/or political leaders did inform citizens of Ecology of Peace Facts; but: (A) citizens, journalists, academics, corporate, religious and political leaders were too greedy to breed and/or consume as much as they want; and so nobody listened to such anti-war Ecology of Peace to support the voluntary non-violent implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; and/or; (B) no Judge or Magistrate was willing to allow Ecology of Peace Facts arguments into their court room; and/or make a ruling in support of requiring their nation to confront the Ecology of Peace Facts for sustainable security of a stable and peaceful nation; and/or (C) not enough Generals and soldiers were willing to collectively support such Ecology of Peace principles and demand by force if need be that their civilian political, religious and legal leaders enact a sustainable world peace social contract.
Current EoP –v– WiP NWO reality future:
Humans have now bred so much, and consumed so much of the earths finite resources, that humanity is now between 700 and 400,000 % over carrying capacity limits. Deindustrialization and depopulation is guaranteed; the only issue is whether de-industrialization and depopulation shall occur via the Ecology of Peace or Masonic War is Peace option.
War is Peace (WiP) NWO Option:
Armageddon — Motarded Rat Race Slavery Freedumb human factory farming organized violence conquer and culling racism, sexism, nationalism, socialism, capitalism, nazism, islamism, zionism, corporatism, stalinism, human sacrifice culling, etc — collision of humans overbreeding and overconsuming with ecological finite resource reality: and mother nature uses death, pestilence, famine, war on an unimaginable scale to very violently reduce human population and consumption.
Political, Legal & Military Options for implementing an Ecology of Peace NWO International Law Social Contract:
Currently the following Ecology of Peace NWO social contract options exist for political or legal implementation of an Ecology of Peace International law social contract; which may be used individually or in select combination or collectively: Ecology of Peace PoW submission to Swiss Federal Council; EoP Referendum; EoP PoW International Criminal Court Complaint; EoP Legal submissions and EoP Military Necessity Mutual Coercion Evacuation.
Note: If or where any internet link above refers to a webpage or document on sqswans and/or tygae.weebly.com; those websites were hacked and the hacker deleted all the contents of those websites including the account on 24 September 2016. Correspondence to among others Weebly, San Francisco District Attorney and Police; regarding the hacked deletion of the websites and account; are documented online at: SQSwans PRH: Updates re: hacking deletion of EoP tygae and sqswans weebly websites.
Annex A [PDF]: Civil Mag Court: District of George Held at George 2578-14: Alt Disp Res
01-01 Table of Contents
02-35: 30 Sep 2015 – 27 Oct 2016 correspondence LJ & FM
36-36: S.Y. Aiglon Reference: Lara Johnstone
37-37: 19 Dec 1998: Beeld: SA plaasmeisie vas in VSA oor Golf protes
38-38: 06 Oct 2016: Clerk of Court letter re: filing of summons
39-42: 30 Sep 2016: Req for Info to Mag Essel: Filing of ANoM; Dignitas Letter
43-48: Lara Johnstone Affidavit in Support of Request for Info
49-49: LJ Affid A: 12.08.2014: Mag Essel ‘lack of jurisdiction’ ITO Sec 46(2) ruling
50-113: LJ Affid B: Correspondence to & from Frode Moe
114-124: LJ Affid C: Correspondence to and from Clive Johnstone
125-139: LJ Affid D: Draft – Particulars of Claim and Enclosures
140-141: Proof of Service
Annex B [PDF]: CCT 23-10: Radical Honesty culture Amicus; BB Expert Witness perjury; Formal Apology to Timothy McVeigh: Re: Radical Honesty Fraud
01-01 Table of Contents
02-03: 03 May 2010: Radical Honesty culture & religion Amicus Concourt Ruling
04-17: Filing Sheet: Amended Practice Note and Written Submissions for Lara Johnstone; in Support of Radical Honesty Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, 34 of 1995.
18-67: Heads of Argument for Lara Johnstone; in Support of Radical Honesty Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, 34 of 1995
68-77: GMC 4643-13 applicant/s correspondence to and from USA, Canada, UK, RSA & Norway Police, Prosecutors/District Attorneys & Courts: Re: Filing of Fraud Charges against Brad Blanton, Radical Honesty Enterprises & Trainers: ZA: Gauteng: Johannesburg: Re: Brad Blanton Expert Witness Perjury.
78-90: Info Re: Oklahoma City Bombing and Faked Execution of Timothy McVeigh; As referred to in: GMC 4643-13 applicant/s correspondence to and from USA, Canada, UK, RSA & Norway Police, Prosecutors/District Attorneys & Courts: Re: Filing of Fraud & Perjury Charges against Brad Blanton, Radical Honesty Enterprises & Trainers