24 Jul: Intl Comm Jurists, Bar Assoc’s: Transparency Notice: EoP App’s Re: Lack of Credibility of WiP Legal Services Cult Law

* Intnl Commission of Jurists … Union of Advocates of Ukraine
» Intnl Commission & Council of Jurists, International, Inter-American & Inter-Pacific Bar Associations, UN General Assembly States: National Bar Associations.
* 24 Jul: Transparency Notice: EoP App’s Re: Lack of Credibility of WiP Legal Services Cult Law.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP v WiP NWO Neg.

* From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 1:19 PM
Subject: Fwd: Transparency Notice: EoP App’s Re: Lack of Credibility of WiP Legal Services Cult Law.
To: “RO: Bucharest Bar Assoc” <secretariat@baroulbucaresti.ro>, “RO: Dolj Bar Assoc” <baroul.dolj@rdscv.ro>, “RU: Federal Chamber of Lawyers of Russia Fed” <info@advpalata.com>, “RU: Int Union of Advocates” <mcca@mail.ru>, “RU: Moscow Chamber of Advocates” <info@advokatymoscow.ru>, “UK: Glasgow Bar Assoc” <glasbarassoc@btclick.com>, “UK: Scotland FAculty of Advocates” <carole.ferguson-walker@advocates.org.uk>, “UK: Law Society of Scotland” <lawscot@lawscot.org.uk>, City of London Law Society <mail@citysolicitors.org.uk>, European Young Bar Assoc <info@eyba.org>, Law Society of Northern Ireland <info@lawsoc-ni.org>, General Council of the Bar of Northern Ireland <chief.executive@barcouncilni.org.uk>, “SK: Slovak Republic” <office@sak.sk>, “ES: Illustre Colegio de Abogados de Madrid” <icam@icam.es>, “ES: Illustre Collegio d’Advocats de Barcelona” <internacional@icab.es>, “ES: Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Malaga” <decano@icamalaga.es>, “ES: Consejo General de la Abogacia” <informacion@cgae.es>, “ES: Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Valencia” <internacional@icav.es>, “SE: Swedish Bar Assoc” <info@advokatsamfundet.se>, “CH: Swiss Bar Assoc” <info@swisslawyers.com>, “TK: Ankara Bar Assoc” <ankarabarosu@ankarabarosu.org.tr>, “TK: Union of Turkish Bars” <admin@barobirlik.org.tr>, “UA: Ukrainian Bar Assoc” <info@uba.ua>, “UA: Union of Advocates of Ukraine” <office@b-i-m.com.ua>
* From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 1:16 PM
Subject: Fwd: Transparency Notice: EoP App’s Re: Lack of Credibility of WiP Legal Services Cult Law.
To: “HU: Budapest Bar Assoc” <bpbar@matavnet.hu>, “IS: Iceland Bar Assoc” <lmfi@lmfi.is>, “IE: Bar Council of Ireland” <barcouncil@lawlibrary.ie>, “IE: Law Soc of Ireland” <general@lawsociety.ie>, “IT: Ordine degli Avvocati di Milano” <segreteria@ordineavvocatimilano.it>, “IT: Avvocati di Roma” <consiglio@ordineavvocati.roma.it>, “IT: Ordine Degli Avvocati Di Perugia” <segreteria@ordineavvocati.perugia.it>, “IT: Ordine degli Avvocati di Genova” <ordavvge@split.it>, “JP: Inter-Pacific Bar Association” <ipba@tga.co.jp>, “KE: Law Society of Kenya” <lsk@lsk.or.ke>, “KS: Kosova Chamber of Advocates” <info@oak-ks.org>, “LV: Latvian Council of Sworn Advocates” <adv-pad@latnet.lv>, “LI: Liechtensteinische Rechtsanwaltskammer” <rechtsanwaltskammer@lirak.li>, “LT: Lithuania Bar Assoc” <lat@advoco.lt>, “LU: Le Barreau de Luxembourg” <info@barreau.lu>, “MK: Macedonian Lawyers Assoc” <mla@mla.org.mk>, “MT: Chamber of Advocates” <info@avukati.org>, “MX: Mexican-American Bar Assoc” <mabalaco@sbcglobal.net>, US Mexico Bar <Info@usmexicobar.org>, Philip Robbins <phil@pcrobbins.com>, Hugo Alvirez <hho@bstl.com.mx>, “NL: Amsterdam Bar Assoc” <deken@aova.nl>, “NL: Netherlands Bar Assoc” <info@advocatenorde.nl>, “NI: Law Society of Northern Ireland” <info@lawsoc-ni.org>, “NI: Gen Council of Bar of Northern Ireland” <chief.executive@barcouncilni.org.uk>, “NO: Norwegian Bar Assoc” <post@advokatforeningen.no>, “PL: Polish Bar Council” <nra@nra.pl>, “PL: National Council of Legal Advisors” <kirp@kirp.pl>, “PK: Supreme Court Bar Association” <info@scbap.org>, “District Bar Association Faisalabad: President” <info@dbafsd.org>, High Court Bar Association Multan <hcbamultan@gmail.com>, High Court Bar Association Rawalpindi <abdulquddusk@gmail.com>, Islamabad Bar Association <info@iba.org.pk>, Karachi Tax Bar Association <itbarkhi@cyber.net.pk>, “PT: Ordem dos Advogados” <cons.geral@cg.oa.pt>
* From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 1:12 PM
Subject: Fwd: Transparency Notice: EoP App’s Re: Lack of Credibility of WiP Legal Services Cult Law.
To: “AM: Bar Assoc of Armenia” <info@iravaban.am>, “AT: Austrian Federal Bar Assoc” <rechtsanwaelte@oerak.at>, “AT: Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien” <office@rakwien.at>, “AZ: Azerbaijan Lawyers Confederation” <k_jafarli@yahoo.com>, “BE: Institut des Juristes d’Entreprise” <info@ije.be>, “BE: Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten bij de Balie te Brussel” <orde@baliebrussel.be>, “BE: Orde van Vlaamse Balies” <info@advocaat.be>, “BG: Sofia Bar Assoc” <sak_sas@abv.bg>, “BG: Supreme Council of Bulgaria” <VASarch@bitex.com>, “CR: Colegio de Profesionales en Criminologia de Costa Rica” <info@criminologia.or.cr>, “HR: Croation Bar Assoc” <hok-cba@hok-cba.hr>, “CY: Cyprus Bar Assoc” <cybar@cytanet.com.cy>, “CZ: Czech Bar Assoc” <international@cak.cz>, “DK: Danish Bar Assoc Law Soc” <bbu@advocom.dk>, “DK: Danish Assoc Law Firms” <uwk@danskeadvokater.dk>, “UK: Law Soc of England and Wales” <mail@citysolicitors.org.uk>, “EU: European Young Bar Assoc” <info@eyba.org>, “UK: UK Commercial Bar Assoc” <admin@combar.com>, “EE: Estonian Bar Assoc” <advokatuur@advokatuur.ee>, “FI: Finnish Bar Assoc” <info@barassociation.fi>, “FR: Assoc Francaise des Avocats” <ace@avocatline.com.fr>, “FR: Assoc Francaise des Juristes” <admin@afje.org>, “FR: Conseil National des Barreaux” <presidence@cnb.advocat.fr>, “FR: Arab Assoc for Int Arbitration” <ahdab@destination.com.lb>, “FR: Ordre des Avocats de Paris” <delegationgenerale@avocatparis.org>, “DE: Deutscher Anwaltverein” <dav@anwaltverein.de>, “DE: German Federal Bar” <zentrale@brak.de>, “GH: Ghana Bar Association” <info@ghanabar.org>, Ghana Judiciary <info@judicial.gov.gh>, Judicial Secretary <judicialsecretary@judicial.gov.gh>, Webmaster <webmaster@judicial.gov.gh>

* From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 1:08 PM
Subject: Transparency Notice: EoP App’s Re: Lack of Credibility of WiP Legal Services Cult Law.
To: Intnl Commission of Jurists <info@icj.org>, International Council of Jurists <contact@internationaljurists.org>, President Martin Solc <msolc@ksb.cz>, Head Office <ksbpraha@ksb.cz>, Michael Greene <mgreene@algoodbody.com>, Almudena Arpon de Mendevil <aam@gomezacebo-pombo.com>, Jaime Carey <jaime.carey@carey.cl>, Jon Grouf <jgrouf@duanemorris.com>, “Bar Issues Commission: Horacio Bernardes Neto” <horaciobernardes@mfra.com.br>, Daniel Del Rio <daniel.delrio@basham.com.mx>, “IBAHRI: Helena Kennedy” <helena@helenakennedy.co.uk>, Stephen Macliver <stephen.macliver@sparke.com.au>, Sternford Moyo <moyos@scanlen.co.zw>, Margery Nicoll <margery.nicoll@lawcouncil.asn.au>, Gabrielle Williamson <gabrielle.williamson@luther-lawfirm.com>, Inter-American Bar Association <iaba@iaba.org>, Inter-Pacific Bar Association <ipba@tga.co.jp>

TO: Intnl Commission & Council of Jurists
TO: International, Inter-American & Inter-Pacific Bar Associations
TO: UN General Assembly States: National Bar Associations. [sent separately]

ICJ, IBA et al Lawyers and Bar Association Officials:

Transparency Notice: EoP App’s Re: Lack of Credibility of WiP Legal Services Cult Law.

Hereby a transparency copy of correspondence to General Stanley McChrystal, Chris Fussell and Julian Assange, regarding the intellectual receptivity and/or obstruction by lawyers to Ecology of Peace scientific and cultural law legal submissions advocacy to courts; in support of the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract.

Excerpt: 24 Jul: McChrystal Group: One Mission: Capability to Connect & Willingness to Convert to EoP law lifestyle values:

Responsible Peacenik Freedom Logistics: Obstacle/Opportunity?: Lawyers.

“What’s wrong with these people?” – FBI Agent Alan Ward, Mississippi Burning.

The legal obstacle will have to be addressed and overcome, with individuals knowing when they sign their responsible peacenik freedom oaths, that if anyone attempts to discriminate against them, for their responsible freedom oath membership status, they shall not end up without legal representation or as happened to me, with mental disorder allegation attacks on their reputation and credibility.

Generally professionally speaking of the professional persons I have informally or formally via legal proceedings discussed or shared EoP scientific and cultural law principles:

The individuals, who have been least willing to be intellectually receptive to EoP scientific and cultural law, have been lawyers, psychologists and academics.

The individuals, who have been most willing to be intellectually receptive to EoP scientific and cultural law, have been magistrates and/or judges, and military or former military officials.

Sometimes legal obstacles can be converted to legal opportunities.

Ultimately lawyers stand the most to lose – in terms of credibility – by their continued obstruction of simple honest and sincere benefit of the doubt, truthseeking evidentiary enquiry into Ecology of Peace scientific and cultural law principles.

Ultimately lawyers stand the most to gain – in terms of credibility – if a group of reform minded lawyers, and prosecutors and judges, simply cooperated to begin the process of correcting the ‘breeding/consumption innocence for sale indulgences’ flaws in their legal services product.

State Official Responses to EoP Legal Submissions contains a summary of the official state – juridical, legislative and executive – responses to EoP legal submissions filed to their courts; arbitration bodies; and/or State Officials.

None of the Magistrates and/or Judges who accepted EoP Legal Submissions applications and/or evidence into the court proceedings, they presided over, have made any written legal ruling, proving any EoP legal evidence submitted to the court proceedings they presided over, to be evidentiary deficient or inaccurate. I imagine, their lack of an EoP or partial EoP legal written order finding, has been the result of all the other parties in the cases, and/or their lawyers, refusal to even discuss, let alone, investigate the EoP evidence submitted into the court proceedings, to determine its legal certainty or plausible legal working hypothesis enquiry accuracy or not.

Three polegal findings/rulings – by North Carolina Legislators, SA Gender Commission and the Russian FSB: Federal Security Service – could be interpreted as partial or reasonably close to full EoP findings/rulings.

EoP MILED Clerk and EoP Applicants preferences – aka what do we want – are available at Eco & Ego Literacy.

~~~~~**~~~~~

EoP v WiP Legal Services Culture:

EoP Summary Re: Difference between EoP and WiP law, as shared in correspondence to Advocate Jeremy Gauntlett QC: 13 May: JG, AdvGrp621, Jhb Bar, BrickCrtCh: Req for Info: J Gauntlett: Alternative Dispute Resolution; Conflict of Cultures policy.

Ecology of Peace Legal Cult: An Ecology of Peace professional legal services culture is a legal theory strategy and/or doctrine that requires its legal expert cult members to inform their clients (a) that the right to breed and consume with total disregard Masonic War is Peace clauses of international law are the root causes of all racial, religious, class, gender psycho-social, economic, political and military resource conflict; (b) the EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] and eco/ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] – aka sincere cooperative truthseeking problem solving oriented communication – skills to enable them to engage in cooperative truthseeking to abolish the WiP clauses of international law and replace them with EoP clauses that require all the worlds citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za]; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za].

Masonic War is Peace Law — like WiP religion, media, charity, psychology, economics, etc — consciously or unconsciously ignores or avoids educating their readers, customers, clients, etc of the — procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; enabled by the WiP right to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of international law — root causes of all — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict; enabling them to socio-politically, economically, etc profit from the racial, religious and class resource war conflict misery, resulting from overpopulation/consumption colliding with finite resources.

~~~~~**~~~~~

Summary: EoP v WiP New World Order Negotiations:

Summary of EoP v WiP New World Order Negotiations, as stated in correspondence to the oligarchs who financed Donald Trump’s Drain the Swamp Presidential campaign, copied to Rudy Giuliani: 21 Jul: DJT 2016 Oligarchs: EoP v WiP NWO Neg: EoP Cultural Law Self Rule, Farmers Crisis & Land Reform:

Someone has to set a high standard, that’s what my father told me. Winston Churchill, Bobby Kennedy. [A Democrat?] As I once was. [Why did you switch?] You know Democrats always talked about things getting better. Republicans did whatever they could to make them better. … So you Harvard? [Yale, Wharton MBA.] Me, I’m City College, NYU Law School, just an average American public school guy, well Catholic School. So, I understand you are going to tell me about these people, insider trading. [That’s right.] Thank you. I mean is this, its nothing new right? You fella’s dont get there on the stairmaster at the golfcourse on the nineteenth hole and a guy tells a story. [Its hardly the same thing.], You, Mr. Gavin and you, Mr Hitchens, you don’t share information? [Well, I will tell you what we don’t do. We don’t skim millions of dollars on the shady edge.] Maybe you don’t have to. Maybe grandpa did it for you. – The Rudy Giuliani Story.

[..]

Shut Down/Drain the WiP Ponzi Profiteering of Resource Conflict Misery Economy Swamp:

Generally speaking, all EoP Legal Submission cases, involve EoP scientific and cultural law evidentiary recommendations to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by ‘turning off the tap’ — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limitscauses of resource conflict and war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order Social Contract that requires a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized sustainable future.

~~~~~**~~~~~

EoP MILED Clerk Stereotyping Suggested Draft for Reform Minded Lawyers:

‘Dear EoP Applicants. We are a group of lawyers, prosecutors and judges, who have been informed of, or become aware of the Ecology of Peace advocacy you are, and have been involved in. In studying the Ecology of Peace legal submissions outlining the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of international law, as the root causes of racial, religious, class and ideological resource conflict disputes, we have become more conscious of how these flaws in our legal services products, have been, and are a direct and indirect contributory cause of racial, religious, gender and class resource conflict; which our legal services products are allegedly supposed to prevent and/or mitigate. We would like to cooperate with you to correct these legal services product flaws and contribute to the co-creation implementation of the EoP scientific and cultural law international law. Would you be willing to meet with us; to discuss how we could cooperate?’

~~~~~**~~~~~

EoP MILED Clerk Suggestion to EoP Axis Military Officials to Evacuate WiP Lawyers obstructing implementation of EoP Intnl law, from Planetary Genepool:

Excerpt of EoP MILED Clerk response to Adv Jeremy Gauntlett QC: 24 Apr 2017: Re: JG Request to be Removed from LJ v Frode Moe ADR correspondence; Alleged Violation of Consent; available at: 23 Apr: FTM, JG: Re: Frode Moe: Conflict of Cultures: LJ v FT Moe:

If you are upset about finding out that the Intnl Association of Prosecutors did not inform you about the EoP Axis Military Necessity Evacuation of all Masonic War is Peace lawyers from Lotto Nations; which may or may not include you and all your fellow Advocates Group and/or BricksCourt advocates, being humanely psychotronically eliminated from the planetary genepool, if or when South Africa or United Kingdom is one of the Lotto nations; if or when EoP Axis officials decide to implement the EoP Axis Lotto Military Necessity Evacuation measure; you or your fellow advocates are welcome to file a written notice of objection and evidence in support of such objection; for EoP Axis officials consideration.

A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at EoP v WiP NWO Neg.

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk

Sent per email to:

Intnl Commission & Council of Jurists:
Intnl Commission of Jurists (info@icj.org); International Council of Jurists (contact@internationaljurists.org);

International, Inter American & Inter-Pacific Bar Associations:
President Martin Solc (msolc@ksb.cz); Head Office (ksbpraha@ksb.cz); Michael Greene (mgreene@algoodbody.com); Almudena Arpon de Mendevil (aam@gomezacebo-pombo.com); Jaime Carey (jaime.carey@carey.cl); Jon Grouf (jgrouf@duanemorris.com);  Bar Issues Commission: Horacio Bernardes Neto (horaciobernardes@mfra.com.br); LPD Representative: Daniel Del Rio (daniel.delrio@basham.com.mx); Co-Chair: IBAHRI: Helena Kennedy (helena@helenakennedy.co.uk); Sec Treas: Stephen Macliver (stephen.macliver@sparke.com.au); Co-Chair: IBAHRI: Sternford Moyo (moyos@scanlen.co.zw); Vice Chair: Bar Issues Commission: Margery Nicoll (margery.nicoll@lawcouncil.asn.au); Chair: Section on Public Professional Interest: Gabrielle Williamson (gabrielle.williamson@luther-lawfirm.com); Inter-American Bar Association (iaba@iaba.org); Inter-Pacific Bar Association (ipba@tga.co.jp);

UN General Assembly States: National Bar Associations:
AM: Bar Assoc of Armenia (info@iravaban.am); AT: Austrian Federal Bar Assoc (rechtsanwaelte@oerak.at); AT: Rechtsanwaltskammer Wien (office@rakwien.at); AZ: Azerbaijan Lawyers Confederation (k_jafarli@yahoo.com); BE: Institut des Juristes d’Entreprise (info@ije.be); BE: Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten bij de Balie te Brussel (orde@baliebrussel.be); BE: Orde van Vlaamse Balies (info@advocaat.be); BG: Sofia Bar Assoc (sak_sas@abv.bg); BG: Supreme Council of Bulgaria (VASarch@bitex.com); CR: Colegio de Profesionales en Criminologia de Costa Rica (info@criminologia.or.cr); HR: Croation Bar Assoc (hok-cba@hok-cba.hr); CY: Cyprus Bar Assoc (cybar@cytanet.com.cy); CZ: Czech Bar Assoc (international@cak.cz); DK: Danish Bar Assoc Law Soc (bbu@advocom.dk); DK: Danish Assoc Law Firms (uwk@danskeadvokater.dk); UK: Law Soc of England and Wales (mail@citysolicitors.org.uk); EU: European Young Bar Assoc (info@eyba.org); UK: UK Commercial Bar Assoc (admin@combar.com); EE: Estonian Bar Assoc (advokatuur@advokatuur.ee); FI: Finnish Bar Assoc (info@barassociation.fi); FR: Assoc Francaise des Avocats (ace@avocatline.com.fr); FR: Assoc Francaise des Juristes (admin@afje.org); FR: Conseil National des Barreaux (presidence@cnb.advocat.fr); FR: Arab Assoc for Int Arbitration (ahdab@destination.com.lb); FR: Ordre des Avocats de Paris (delegationgenerale@avocatparis.org); DE: Deutscher Anwaltverein (dav@anwaltverein.de); DE: German Federal Bar (zentrale@brak.de); GH: Ghana Bar Association (info@ghanabar.org); Ghana Judiciary (info@judicial.gov.gh); Judicial Secretary (judicialsecretary@judicial.gov.gh); Webmaster (webmaster@judicial.gov.gh); HU: Budapest Bar Assoc (bpbar@matavnet.hu); IS: Iceland Bar Assoc (lmfi@lmfi.is); IE: Bar Council of Ireland (barcouncil@lawlibrary.ie); IE: Law Soc of Ireland (general@lawsociety.ie); IT: Ordine degli Avvocati di Milano (segreteria@ordineavvocatimilano.it); IT: Avvocati di Roma (consiglio@ordineavvocati.roma.it); IT: Ordine Degli Avvocati Di Perugia (segreteria@ordineavvocati.perugia.it); IT: Ordine degli Avvocati di Genova (ordavvge@split.it); JP: Inter-Pacific Bar Association (ipba@tga.co.jp); KE: Law Society of Kenya (lsk@lsk.or.ke); KS: Kosova Chamber of Advocates (info@oak-ks.org); LV: Latvian Council of Sworn Advocates (adv-pad@latnet.lv); LI: Liechtensteinische Rechtsanwaltskammer (rechtsanwaltskammer@lirak.li); LT: Lithuania Bar Assoc (lat@advoco.lt); LU: Le Barreau de Luxembourg (info@barreau.lu); MK: Macedonian Lawyers Assoc (mla@mla.org.mk); MT: Chamber of Advocates (info@avukati.org); MX: Mexican-American Bar Assoc (mabalaco@sbcglobal.net); US Mexico Bar (Info@USMexicoBar.org); Philip Robbins (phil@pcrobbins.com); Hugo Alvirez (hho@bstl.com.mx); NL: Amsterdam Bar Assoc (deken@aova.nl); NL: Netherlands Bar Assoc (info@advocatenorde.nl); NI: Law Society of Northern Ireland (info@lawsoc-ni.org); NI: Gen Council of Bar of Northern Ireland (chief.executive@barcouncilni.org.uk); NO: Norwegian Bar Assoc (post@advokatforeningen.no); PL: Polish Bar Council (nra@nra.pl); PL: National Council of Legal Advisors (kirp@kirp.pl); PK: Supreme Court Bar Association (info@scbap.org); District Bar Association Faisalabad: President (info@dbafsd.org); High Court Bar Association Multan (hcbamultan@gmail.com); High Court Bar Association Rawalpindi (abdulquddusk@gmail.com); Islamabad Bar Association (info@iba.org.pk); Karachi Tax Bar Association (itbarkhi@cyber.net.pk); PT: Ordem dos Advogados (cons.geral@cg.oa.pt); RO: Bucharest Bar Assoc (secretariat@baroulbucaresti.ro); RO: Dolj Bar Assoc (baroul.dolj@rdscv.ro); RU: Federal Chamber of Lawyers of Russia Fed (info@advpalata.com); RU: Int Union of Advocates (mcca@mail.ru); RU: Moscow Chamber of Advocates (info@advokatymoscow.ru); UK: Glasgow Bar Assoc (glasbarassoc@btclick.com); UK: Scotland FAculty of Advocates (carole.ferguson-walker@advocates.org.uk); UK: Law Society of Scotland (lawscot@lawscot.org.uk); City of London Law Society (mail@citysolicitors.org.uk); European Young Bar Assoc (info@eyba.org); Law Society of Northern Ireland (info@lawsoc-ni.org); General Council of the Bar of Northern Ireland (chief.executive@barcouncilni.org.uk); Glasgow Bar Association (glasbarassoc@btclick.com); Parliament House Faculty of Advocates (carole.ferguson-walker@advocates.org.uk); Law Society of Scotland (lawscot@lawscot.org.uk); SK: Slovak Republic (office@sak.sk); ES: Illustre Colegio de Abogados de Madrid (icam@icam.es); ES: Illustre Collegio d’Advocats de Barcelona (internacional@icab.es); ES: Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Malaga (decano@icamalaga.es); ES: Consejo General de la Abogacia (informacion@cgae.es); ES: Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Valencia (internacional@icav.es); SE: Swedish Bar Assoc (info@advokatsamfundet.se); CH: Swiss Bar Assoc (info@swisslawyers.com); TK: Ankara Bar Assoc (ankarabarosu@ankarabarosu.org.tr); TK: Union of Turkish Bars (admin@barobirlik.org.tr); UA: Ukrainian Bar Assoc (info@uba.ua); UA: Union of Advocates of Ukraine (office@b-i-m.com.ua)

.