24 Jul: McChrystal Group: One Mission: Capability to Connect & Willingness to Convert to EoP law lifestyle values

* Chris Fussell … Wikileaks
» Chris Fussell, Stan McChrystal, Adv Group 621, Jonathan Blou, Timothy Bruinders, Schalk Burger, Johannesburg Society of Advocates Committee, L Gcbashe, K Pillay, A Platt, PF Roussouw, JA Babamia, G Badela, AI Cajee, N Lombard, DJ Mahon, M Sello, NK Tsatswane, S Yacoob, Adv. Roelof du Plessis, TAU, Bennie van Zyl, PLAAS: Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies, Andries du Toit, Ursula Arends, Ben Cousins, Ruth Hall, Vumelana: Land Reform: Four Scenario Futures, African Farmers, Solms-Delta, Craig MacGillivray, Julian Assange, Wikileaks.
* 24 Jul: McChrystal Group: One Mission: Capability to Connect & Willingness to Convert to EoP law lifestyle values.
» SABC: The Big Debate (ep. 1, Feb 17): Does Land Reform Threaten Our Future?. EM Earth: History of Effective MicroOrganisms: Little Organisms, Big Revolution! ARTE GEIE Alma Films Point du Jour: The Rise and Fall of the Russian Oligarchs. CSpan: Q & A: Carl Colby.
702 Radio: Meet Mark Solms, the winemaker who made EVERYONE on his farm co-owners.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: APD v Afriforum, EoP v Wikileaks / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Applicants | EoP NTE GMA: Cabinet | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP ADR / EoP v WiP NWO Neg.

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 12:27 AM
Subject: McChrystal Group: One Mission: Capability to Connect & Willingness to Convert to EoP law lifestyle values.
To: Stan McChrystal <stan@mcchrystalgroup.com>, Chris Fussell <OneMission@mcchrystalgroup.com>
Cc: Jonathan Blou <jblou@group621.co.za>, Timothy Bruinders <bruinders@law.co.za>, Schalk Burger <sfburger@mweb.co.za>, L Gcbashe <leahgca@thulamelachambers.co.za>, K Pillay <kpillay@duma.nokwe.co.za>, A Platt <aplatt@law.co.za>, PF Roussouw <rossouwp@law.co.za>, JA Babamia <jbabamia@law.co.za>, G Badela <ghandi@badela.co.za>, AI Cajee <aicajee@law.co.za>, N Lombard <advnicolel@mweb.co.za>, DJ Mahon <mahon@law.co.za>, M Sello <msello@duma.nokwe.co.za>, NK Tsatswane <ken@law.co.za>, S Yacoob <yacoob@thulamelachambers.co.za>, “Adv. Roelof du Plessis” <advr@mweb.co.za>, “TAU CEO: Mnr. Bennie van Zyl” <hb@tlu.co.za>, Andries du Toit <info@plaas.org.za>, Ursula Arends <uarends@plaas.org.za>, Ben Cousins <bcousins@plaas.org.za>, Ruth Hall <rhall@plaas.org.za>, “Vumelana: Land Reform: Four Scenario Futures” <info@landreformfutures.org>, African Farmers <info@moshatemedia.co.za>, Solms-Delta <info@solms-delta.co.za>, Craig MacGillivray <craig@solms-delta.co.za>

TO: Chris Fussell and Stan McChrystal
CC: Advocates Group 621, Johannesburg Bar: Committee; Tvl Agric Union:
CC: TAU, PLAAS, Vumulena, Solms-Delta
CC: Wikileaks: Julian Assange

Chris Fussell and Stan McChrystal
McChrystal Group: Stan McChrystal (stan@mcchrystalgroup.com); Chris Fussell (OneMission@Mcchrystalgroup.com)

Advocates Group 621, Johannesburg Bar: Committee; Tvl Agric Union:
Adv Group 621: Jonathan Blou (jblou@group621.co.za); Timothy Bruinders (bruinders@law.co.za); Schalk Burger (sfburger@mweb.co.za); Johannesburg Society of Advocates Committee: L Gcbashe (leahgca@thulamelachambers.co.za); K Pillay (kpillay@duma.nokwe.co.za); A Platt (aplatt@law.co.za); PF Roussouw (rossouwp@law.co.za); JA Babamia (jbabamia@law.co.za); G Badela (ghandi@badela.co.za); AI Cajee (aicajee@law.co.za); N Lombard (advnicolel@mweb.co.za); DJ Mahon (mahon@law.co.za); M Sello (msello@duma.nokwe.co.za); NK Tsatswane (ken@law.co.za); S Yacoob (yacoob@thulamelachambers.co.za); Adv. Roelof du Plessis (advr@mweb.co.za)
Ref: * Citizens for Responsible Freedom Database: Land Reform Opportunities; * Responsible Peacenik Freedom Logistics: Obstacle/Opportunity?: Lawyers; * Conclusion: All ‘Human’ beings on Planet Earths EoP v WiP Future Decision Making.

TAU, PLAAS, Vumulena, Solms-Delta:
TAU CEO: Mnr. Bennie van Zyl (hb@tlu.co.za); PLAAS: Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies: Andries du Toit (info@plaas.org.za); Ursula Arends (uarends@plaas.org.za); Ben Cousins (bcousins@plaas.org.za); Ruth Hall (rhall@plaas.org.za); Vumelana: Land Reform: Four Scenario Futures (info@landreformfutures.org); African Farmers (info@moshatemedia.co.za); Solms-Delta (info@solms-delta.co.za.); Craig MacGillivray (craig@solms-delta.co.za)
Ref: Citizens for Responsible Freedom Database: Land Reform Opportunities

Wikileaks: Julian Assange:
Julian Assange: @JulianAssange; Wikileaks: @wikileaks
Ref: Responsible Peacenik Freedom Logistics: Wikileaks.

Chris and Stan:

McChrystal Group: One Mission: Capability to Connect & Willingness to Convert to EoP law lifestyle values.

Issues Addressed in this – apologies – multitasking response:
* Redesigning ourselves, capability to connect, willingness to create a new culture:
* Conversion from WiP to EoP Culture: Re: Capability to Connect & Willingness to Convert to EoP law lifestyle values:
* Responsible Peacenik Freedom Logistics: Wikileaks.
* Responsible Peacenik Freedom Logistics: Sensitive Non-Partisan Implementation.
* Responsible Peacenik Freedom Logistics: Obstacle/Opportunity?: Lawyers.
* Conclusion: All ‘Human’ beings on Planet Earths EoP v WiP Future Decision Making.

Redesigning ourselves, capability to connect, willingness to create a new culture:

Chris has been more acutely focused on the how of our organizational transformation than anyone else I knew. Sure, other officers might have led at higher levels, had more intense battlefield stories, or saw parts of the war that Chris did not; but in my many years within the special operations community, I didn’t know a single leader who was more intellectually curious as to what was practically taking place at an organization-wide level, across all tiers and different perspectives that our hierarchy offered.

Of equal importance, Chris will offer a view on what behaviors a team of teams model requires from its leaders if it is to truly thrive. In the Task Force, we had not only to create a new series of practices but also to leverage that model through the communalization of new cultural norms and behaviors.

Among the Task Force’s senior leadership, it was obvious that the various parts of the organization were, in the early days of the fight, both unable and unwilling to connect and collaborate. We had to redesign ourselves and create not only the capability to connect, but the willingness to create a new culture, one populated by exceptionally powerful tribes. Without both aspects in place, the effort to establish either one is redundant.
– McChrystal Group: A Roadmap to Building Your Team of Teams.

As stated via EoP MILED Clerk 23 July 2017: 18:27 hrs twitter’s short ansa: I noticed, read the latest McChrystal Group Linked post: A Roadmap to Building Your Team of Teams; and listened to/watched the accompanying video: Why your team needs a centralized mission.

I am not interested in a Team of Teams, but I am happy to cooperate with EoP Applicants and NSA/Kremlin officials [EoP FSB; FUC v NSA] to build a cooperative multi-racial, religious, ideological Responsible Peacenik Freedom Team of Teams, to provide responsible peacenik freedom human resource, advocacy and logistics support to political and religious leaders to implement EoP international law, if possible.

Conversion from WiP to EoP Culture: Re: Capability to Connect & Willingness to Convert to EoP law lifestyle values:

If by willingness to create a new culture, you are referring to the co-creation of an EoP culture; empowering/enabling individuals from different racial, religious and ideological sub-cultures of the WiP culture, to consider converting their procreation, consumption and communication values to Ecology of Peace scientific and cultural law values; to cooperatively create a Responsible Peacenik Freedom foundation of human resource advocacy and support for political and religious leaders to implement EoP international law, as noted in EoP TRC Draft Statements: ‘Responsible Peacenik Freedom Database’ Resources and Logistics concept:

Draft Statement: EoP Axis Psychotronic Surveillance Officials:

To Secretary of Defence:

If or when the Secretary of Defence of an EoP Axis [eop-axis.tygae.org.za] Nation decides to convene his strategic and tactical advisor Generals, for a Wannsee like meeting to discuss a Final Solution to the Egyptian aka EoP AlSisi [eop-alsisi.tygae.org.za] Question; we hereby confirm that there are EoP supporting Generals who would be willing to (a) provide the Secretary of Defence with their buck stops here written support and suggested EoP New World Order Social Contract Options [eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za] strategy – subject to resources and logistics permitting – for implementing an EoP international law social contract; (b) resign  –  subject to EoP Applicants: Johnstone and McVeigh being granted their preferred Russia assisted suicide departure preferences  – if the Secretary of Defence, President/Prime Minister and/or their oligarch bosses; decline to accept the EoP strategy and tactical recommendations; preferring to proceed with WiP military strategy and tactical plans.

Summary of Egyptian Question: EoP v WiP Global War on Terror Metrics Ethics Question: Is their sufficient EoP – Military, State Official, Media, Academia, Religious, Citizen, etc – support to reform and/or abolish the War is a Masonic Breeding Slaves and Cannon Fodder Fertility Religion for Human Sacrifice and Profit Racket; built upon WiP Intnl law – ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of international law’ – foundation.

Summary of the War is a Masonic Breeding Slaves and Cannon Fodder Fertility Religion for Human Sacrifice and Profit Racket can be found in EoP Summary of WiP History.

To Supreme/Constitutional Court and Intnl Court of Justice Judges:

If or when any Nation State’s Constitutional Court – in response to the EoP Axis [eop-axis.tygae.org.za] EoP NTE GMLS [eop-nte-gmls.tygae.org.za] polegal process; or from a EoP Legal Submission [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za] application before it;  – recommends such EoP or WiP dispute to it; to the International Court of Justice for EoP or WiP international law deliberation.

And: if or when the International Court of Justice – makes a final ruling confirming or repudiating EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za]; related to the EoP v WiP NWO Neg: Military Ethics Q: Whom Should the Military Kill; we hereby confirm that there are EoP supporting Generals who (a) shall obey – resources and logistics permitting – the EoP or WiP international law ruling/orders of the International Court of Justice; and/or (b) are willing to honourably resign – property ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za] resources permitting –  from full employment by the state, to become community low tech organic kibbutz like farmers providing their military skills as unpaid volunteers to local volunteer community police and/or militia; to provide support to communities to obey – resources and logistics permitting – the EoP international law ruling/orders of the International Court of Justice.

Re: Resources and Logistics Permitting:

EoP MILED Clerk’s – thinking attempt to walk in Adm Rogers, Gen Bortnikov, Gen Petr Pavel, thinking shoes – estimates of some of the Resources and Logistics Required by NSA, Kremlin, NATO, People’s Republic of China, etc – Officials, to reasonably, effectively, orderly and humanely obey and implement an ICJ EoP Ruling:

Citizens for Responsible Peacenik Freedom Database:

If all nations alleged ‘peaceniks’ and ‘peace with Russia’ Trump Voters were encouraged and supported to confirm their written cooperative support for a Responsible Freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] future; then state resources currently focussed on management of the WiP Intnl law symptoms; could be redirected to address root causes problem solving to implement an EoP Intnl law social contract, to enable orderly and humane reduction in size of the government work force and corresponding taxes of citizens, aka orderly transition to smaller government.

Military and Juridical Officials WiP management workload would be significantly reduced, enabling EoP Problem Solving:

If all nations alleged general ‘peacenik’ –  oligarchs, citizens, academics, media, religions — and ‘we voted for peace with Russia’ Trump voters, (i) signed their Responsible Freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] Oaths, or (ii) clarified what kind of help they needed to begin to walk their responsible peacenik freedom  eco/ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] talk as enunciated in such intended oath; so as to be able to confidently sign their Responsible Freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oaths.

If Wikileaks would be willing to create and manage a Responsible Freedom database, pending ICJ final EoP or WiP ruling:

Then citizens who have signed their Responsible Freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oaths could submit them to Wikileaks, ultimately to be transferred to respective Nation State Archives; pending ICJ final EoP or WiP ruling; publicly notifying their particular secular or religious political party and/or candidate/s and/or leaders; of their buck stops here oath support for an EoP responsible freedom future for all.

Such a Responsible Freedom database would provide religious leaders, afraid of risking their religious political capital – Invictus: Springboks decision – with supportive responsible freedom ethical pressure from their followers; to adopt responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] procreation, consumption and informed consent lifestyle changes, of ultimate benefit for their racial or gender based religious community’s cultural or religious law self rule [cult-law-self-rule.tygae.org.za], to practice their particular religious preservation observances in international law legally approved – racial, religious or gender separate – self-rule communities.

Such a Responsible Freedom database would provide industrial agriculture corporate leaders with access to farmland; or large landowners; the ability to ascertain how many citizens are willing to voluntarily adopt responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] procreation, consumption and informed consent lifestyle changes, enabling such agri-corporate, farmers or landowner, decision-makers to voluntarily begin to allocate partial sections of their farm land property directly to responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] citizens, families or racial, religious, cultural or gender based cultural or religious law self rule [cult-law-self-rule.tygae.org.za] groups of citizens they have interviewed, to start responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] kibbutz style organic self sufficient farming cooperatives.

Such a Responsible Freedom database would provide military leaders a clearer indication where they need to focus their strategic and tactical resources to (a) help racial, religious or ideological individuals or groups who need help to learn to walk their responsible peacenik freedom talk; to get the help they need; enabling them to sign their Responsible Freedom oaths; and/or (b) which groups are beyond the small degree of rationality boundary; and require coercive State mass surveillance or otherwise pressure.

Responsible Peacenik Freedom Logistics: Wikileaks.

I don’t know what Wikileaks and/or Julian Assange’s thoughts are on the issue of cooperating regarding temporarily hosting the responsible peacenik freedom database.

If Wikileaks/Julian is not interested, then other people and/or groups can be contacted.

Responsible Peacenik Freedom Logistics: Sensitive Non-Partisan Implementation.

If it is ultimately implemented, it would be important to implement in a non-partisan – racial, religious, gender, ideological, etc – manner. This could be accomplished by getting the first group of individuals signing the responsible peacenik freedom oaths to include at least a few individuals from all racial, religious, gender and ideological – left/right – groups. Once it is established its possible more people from one or other particular religion, race, or gender, may join, but the message must be that the database is non-partisan: that anyone who wants to provide their responsible freedom oath support provides such support to any and all international political and religious leaders to cooperate to implement an EoP international law social contract. That any political or religious leader cooperating to implement an EoP Intnl law social contract, does so on behalf of all responsible freedom citizens, of all races, religions and genders.

Responsible Peacenik Freedom Logistics: Obstacle/Opportunity?: Lawyers.

“What’s wrong with these people?” – FBI Agent Alan Ward, Mississippi Burning.

The legal obstacle will have to be addressed and overcome, with individuals knowing when they sign their responsible peacenik freedom oaths, that if anyone attempts to discriminate against them, for their responsible freedom oath membership status, they shall not end up without legal representation or as happened to me, with mental disorder allegation attacks on their reputation and credibility.

Generally professionally speaking of the professional persons I have informally or formally via legal proceedings discussed or shared EoP scientific and cultural law principles:

The individuals, who have been least willing to be intellectually receptive to EoP scientific and cultural law, have been lawyers, psychologists and academics.

The individuals, who have been most willing to be intellectually receptive to EoP scientific and cultural law, have been magistrates and/or judges, and military or former officials.

Sometimes legal obstacles can be converted to legal opportunities.

Ultimately lawyers stand the most to lose – in terms of credibility – by their continued obstruction of simple honest and sincere benefit of the doubt, truthseeking evidentiary enquiry into Ecology of Peace scientific and cultural law principles.

Ultimately lawyers stand the most to gain – in terms of credibility – if a group of reform minded lawyers, and prosecutors and judges, simply cooperated to begin the process of correcting the ‘breeding/consumption innocence for sale indulgences’ flaws in their legal services product.

State Official Responses to EoP Legal Submissions contains a summary of the official state – juridical, legislative and executive – responses to EoP legal submissions filed to their courts; arbitration bodies; and/or State Officials.

None of the Magistrates and/or Judges who accepted EoP Legal Submissions applications and/or evidence into the court proceedings, they presided over, have made any written legal ruling, proving any EoP legal evidence submitted to the court proceedings they presided over, to be evidentiary deficient or inaccurate. I imagine, their lack of an EoP or partial EoP legal written order finding, has been the result of all the other parties in the cases, and/or their lawyers, refusal to even discuss, let alone, investigate the EoP evidence submitted into the court proceedings, to determine its legal certainty or plausible legal working hypothesis enquiry accuracy or not.

Three polegal findings/rulings – by North Carolina Legislators, SA Gender Commission and the Russian FSB: Federal Security Service – could be interpreted as partial or reasonably close to full EoP findings/rulings.

EoP MILED Clerk and EoP Applicants preferences – aka what do we want – are available at Eco & Ego Literacy.

Conclusion: All ‘Human’ beings on Planet Earths EoP v WiP Future Decision Making:

As noted at: EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 07 Jul: Ron Jager .. Jason Greenblatt:

There are similarities between a culture or society with different tribes of individuals; and the micro-organisms in a compost heap.

In the microbial world of a compost heap, approximately 5% of the micro-organisms are defined as regenerative bacteria – those which heal, restore and enliven. On the other extreme, roughly 5% are defined as degenerative bacteria – those which break down, decompose and putrefy. Both ends of the spectrum perform important functions. The other 90% of microorganisms are generally neutral and will follow the lead of whichever alliance establishes dominance. The degenerative alliances are most predominant and essentially work on the principles of dominance, control, and suppression. Whereas the regenerative alliances work on the principles of partnership, cooperation, and empowerment. Rather than working on the principles of suppression, the regenerative alliances have the ability to enliven that broad-based 90% of neutral microbes, so that they begin performing the many functions that they were designed to perform. Adding a particular effective micro-organism to your compost heap, can tip the 90% neutral organisms either way. [EM Earth: History of Effective MicroOrganisms: Little Organisms, Big Revolution!]

“I’ll be cynical to say that society can be divided into two groups. There is the minority who are never happy with what they have, who are always searching and creating things; and there’s the majority, who work honestly and professionally. Those who lead and those who follow.” – Vladimir Guzinsky; The Rise and Fall of the Russian Oligarchs.

“I think it’s my mothers indomitable spirit. She’s World War II generation. I’ll give you a little insight. I didn’t put it in the film but while I interviewed her [Barbara Colby], we were talking about Iraq and Afghanistan; and she said ‘Where is my sacrifice? What am I being asked to do, where is my part in this war. If we are at war, give me something to do, and maybe I should ration; or maybe I should go and visit the VA hospital or wrap bandages. If I am part of this, where is my sacrifice?’. – Carl Colby; CSpan: Q & A: Carl Colby.

All racial, religious or ideological socio-culture’s composed of humans, have a small percentage of individuals focused on cooperation, partnership and empowerment, and another percentage of individuals focused on domination, control and suppression; and the other 90% of neutral humans whose life-goals are simple: With access to land, using their own labour, they are  capable of being happy and satisfying their Maslow Hiearchy of Needs — Physiological, Safety, Love and Belonging, Esteem and Self Actualization – without exceeding ecological carrying capacity limits. Have you ever seen the wooden lace windows in a Russian village?; or watched the Community Solution documentary: The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil?. See also: IGN: Community Self Sufficiency: Rural Off Grid Russians Unphased by Economic Collapse. These simple people can be tipped either way; towards cooperative rationing sharing and problem solving, or mass hoarding hysteria mobjustice, looting or mass murder. For example: Consider the Japanese cooperative rationing sacrifice and sharing during the Fukushima earthquake; vs their gang raping, pillaging and mass murder; during the rape of Nanking.

Similarly, a family, village, region, nation or planet confronting SS DEFCON 2: Scarcity Conflict; the neutral majority can be led by their racial, religious, class or cultural leaders towards sincere root cause problem solving rationing – including of procreation, production and consumption – and equitable sharing of available resources use below ecological carrying capacity limits; or they can be led to mass hoarding hysteria mobjustice looting and race, class and religious war; and looking the other way, while their family members, neighbors, members of their church, are carted off to concentration camp ovens; simply because they belonged to the wrong race, religion, gender, or class.

A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at EoP v WiP NWO Neg.

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk

.

Twitter Notices:

EoP MILED Clerk: 24 July 2017: 00:55 hrs: @JulianAssange @wikileaks EoP corr 4 u – Ref: Responsible Peacenik Freedom Logistics: Wikileaks – at http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2017/07/24-jul-mcchrystal-group/

.