* Iron March… West’s Darkest Hour
» Iron March, Atom Waffen Division, Rope Culture, West’s Darkest Hour, Chechar.
* 25 Jul: Re: EoP Response to Rope Culture: James Mason is Back; via West’s Darkest Hour.
» 25 Jul: Edit Re: EoP Response to Rope Culture: James Mason is Back; via West’s Darkest Hour.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP Ft Bragg: Military Ethics Q / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Religion / EoP v WiP ism / EoP RH FR / EoP v WiP NWO Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk <firstname.lastname@example.org>
* Date: Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:50 AM
Subject: Edit Re: EoP Response to Rope Culture: James Mason is Back; via West’s Darkest Hour.
To: Rope Culture <email@example.com>
Cc: “West’s Darkest Hour: Chechar” <firstname.lastname@example.org>
* Date: Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: EoP Response to Rope Culture: James Mason is Back; via West’s Darkest Hour.
To: Rope Culture <email@example.com>
Cc: “West’s Darkest Hour: Chechar” <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Apologies: A few edits
Iron March, Atom Waffen Division
Rope Culture (email@example.com)
CC: West’s Darkest Hour: Chechar (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Iron March & James Mason:
Re: EoP Response to Rope Culture: James Mason is Back; via West’s Darkest Hour.
This is an Ecology of Peace v Masonic War is Peace New World Order Negotiations transparency notice, on behalf of EoP Applicants; to inform you of the following information:
I read the article: Rope Culture: James Mason is Back, via The West’s Darkest Hour: James Mason is Back. I noticed your category: 1488 Confessions. This is not a 1488 confession, although it includes reference to a re-interpretation of David Lane’s 14 words in an Ecology of Peace context. This is also not an official submission for publication, although you are welcome to publish it in full, if you would like to engage your readers on any of the EoP v WiP NWO Negotiation issues.
I am not a ‘national socialist’. In fact, as a member of an Ecology of Peace culture, I don’t subscribe to any of the Masonic War is Peace left or right, white or black, ideologies.
EoP Re: Pentti Linkola vs Adolf Hitler as European Saviour:
I don’t consider Adolf Hitler a hero, nor do I consider him worthy of the demonization that he has received from so many. I consider his ‘collateral damage’ actions of any alleged mass murderer – whether Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, etc – within the context of his honourable or not strategic goals, and the greater socio-cultural and economic geopolitical reality s/he found himself in at the time. Irrespective of whether the alleged mass murderer is Anders Breivik, Timothy McVeigh, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, I ask the same questions: were his/her actions subjectively and/or objectively legally justified, and if not, what were mitigating and/or aggravating factors?
I imagine if the Versailles Treaty had been negotiated through an Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation process, resulting in the implementation of an EoP international law social contract, Hitler would probably have been a happy little yeoman farmer in Austria or Germany, with Blondi and Ava, and nobody would have ever heard of him. Similarly Osama Bin Laden, Ramzi Yousef, Anders Breivik, Che Guevara, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, Polpot, Charles Taylor, Fidel Castro, etc, etc, would probably have been happy little yeoman organic farmers in their villages in the Middle East, Asia or Latin America, etc. There would currently be less than a billion people on planet earth, all of them – of all races, genders and religions, entitled to their responsible freedom property ration of 7.2 gha at a population of 1 billion, or 72 gha at population of 100 million as per eco-footprint carrying capacity EoP Intnl law – living in responsible freedom villages and nations, as Aryans lived for thousands of years on the Steppe, Bushmen lived in the Kalahari, Chuckchi’s lived in Chukotka, etc.
Gimbutas noted the stable Aryan population, that a village founded in 8000 BC was still a village 4000BC. This also allowed them to sustainably farm the land. And live in peace. Nobody was ripping off others to feed the kids he sired. …. Hence the peace of yeoman farmers who are all betas.
– SQSwans: Reports: Day Brown: Proto Indo-European.
Russian President Vladimir Putin wants you to rethink what you know about Russia and the Soviet Union and understand the “objective” truth about their history. On Thursday Kremlin announced a strategy advising Russia’s ministries and public organizations to make plans to spread “objective historical and current information about the Russian Federation, including its role in defeating Nazism.”
– IG: 17-05-17_putin-objectivetruth-wwii
Another element that was helpful to Russians was a particular feature of Russian culture: since money was not particularly useful in the Soviet era economy, and did not convey status or success, it was not particularly prized either, and shared rather freely. Friends thought nothing of helping each other out in times of need. It was important that everyone had some, not that one had more than the others. With the arrival of market economics, this cultural trait disappeared, but it persisted long enough to help people to survive the transition.
A small farm offers somewhat better possibilities for farming, but most farms in the U.S. are mortgaged to the hilt, and most land that has been under intensive cultivation has been mercilessly bombarded with chemical fertilizers, herbicides and insecticides, making it an unhealthy place, inhabited by men with tiny sperm counts. Small farms tend to be lonely places, and many, without access to diesel or gasoline, would become dangerously remote. You will need neighbors to barter with, to help you, and to keep you company. Even a small farm is probably overkill in terms of the amount of farmland available, because without the ability to get crops to market, or a functioning cash economy to sell them in, there is no reason to grow a large surplus of food. Tens of acres are a waste when all you need is a few thousand square feet. Many Russian families managed to survive with the help of a standard garden plot of one sotka, which is 100 square meters, or, if you prefer, 0.024710538 acres, or 1076.391 square feet.
What is needed, of course, is a small town or a village: a relatively small, relatively dense settlement, with about an acre of farmland for every 30 or so people, and with zoning regulations designed for fair use and sustainability, not opportunities for capital investment, growth, property values, or other sorts of “development”. Further, it would have to be a place where people know each other and are willing to help each other – a real community. There may still be a few hundred communities like that tucked away here and there in the poorer counties in the United States, but there are not enough of them, and most of them are too poor to absorb a significant population of economic migrants.
– SS DEFCON: Reports: Orlov: Post-Soviet Lessons for a Post-American Century.
» EoP Leg Sub: DJT 2016 Oligarchs: EoP v WiP NWO Neg: EoP Cultural Law Self Rule, Farmers Crisis & Land Reform.
I understand that an individual who does not view Hitler neutrally, but who perceives Hitler’s national socialist ideology as the foundation and/or the cultural and ideological framework through which they perceive reality; would subjectively interpret Hitler’s role in the co-creation of national socialism, as perhaps ‘saving their lives’ or something to that effect; not too different from a Christian’s perception of Jesus, or a Muslim’s perception of Muhammed and so on. Subjectively speaking: a prophet of his/her racial religion.
As far as I am aware, Adolf Hitler died before I was born, so I don’t think he saved my life. My progenitors left Europe for Africa, during the Europeans Catholics mass murder and persecution of European Protestants, long before the arrival of Hitler, so I don’t have much emotional attachment, in the context of being biologically European, to Adolf Hitler.
My opinions of Adolf Hitler and his National Socialist fascist policies are the same as my opinions to Anders Breivik, regarding his Oslo and Utoya attacks, as stated to him personally in writing, in response to his letter thanking me for my legal submissions to courts – Norway v Breivik, LJ v Norway – on behalf of his right to a free and fair trial; equivalent to the free and fair trial provided to Nelson Mandela by the Apartheid National party government.
If you [Anders Breivik] had committed your attacks in support of an ideology to destroy industrial civilisation, in support of a message of living in ecological harmony with nature, both in terms of procreation and consumption; some form of Ishmael neo-tribal primitivism; then my support for your right to a free and fair trial would coincide with my support for your ideology. For example: If I was to endorse fascism, it would never be that of European Militant Nationalists, but that of Eco-Fascist: Pentti Linkola‘s deep green ecology views.
– EoP MILED Clerk to Anders Breivik, response to letter from Anders Breivik thanking her for her support for a free and fair treason trial.
— Norway v Anders Breivik: 13 August 2012: Request Clarification: RE: Habeus Mentem, Amicus Curiae and Review Applications Filed [PDF].
Although Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party were not Pentti Linkola Ecofascists, they did have significantly greater concerns for the environment than their fellow industrial totalitarian agriculture contemporaries, including concerns for animal welfare: Martin Durkin: Nazi Greens: An Inconvenient History; Google Books: How Green Were the Nazis?: Nature, Environment, and Nation in the Third Reich; by Franz-Josef Brüggemeier, Mark Cioc, Thomas Zeller; Haaretz: Brown and Green: Were the Nazis Forerunners of Environmental ovements?; Spunk: Ecofascism: Lessons from the German Experience: Fascist Ecology: The “Green Wing” of the Nazi Party and its Historical Antecedents; Counterpunch: Feeling Their Pain: Animal Rights and the Nazis.
“If there were a button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without hesitating, if it meant millions of people would die.” – Pentti Linkola
– Milbank, Dana (24 May 1994). “A Strange Finnish Thinker Posits War, Famine as Ultimate ‘Goods'”. The Wall Street Journal Asia. p. 1.
If the present amount of Earths population is preserved and is reduced only by the means of birth control, then: * Birthgiving must be licenced. To enhance population quality, genetically or socially unfit homes will be denied offspring, so that several birth licences can be allowed to families of quality. * Energy production must be drastically reduced. Electricity is allowed only for the most necessary lighting and communications. * Food: Hunting must be made more efficient. Human diet will include rats and invertebrate animals. Agriculture moves to small un-mechanized units. All human manure is used as fertilizer. * Traffic is mostly done with bicycles and rowing boats. Private cars are confiscated. Long-distance travel is done with sparse mass transport. Trees will be planted on most roads. * Foreign affairs: All mass immigration and most of import-export trade must stop. Cross-border travel is allowed only for small numbers of diplomats and correspondents. * Business will mostly end. Manufacture is allowed only for well argumented needs. All major manufacturing capacity is state owned. Products will be durable and last for generations. * Science and schooling: Education will concentrate on practical skills. All competition is rooted out. Technological research is reduced to extreme minimum. But every child will learn how to clean a fish in a way that only the big shiny bones are left over.
Linkola is one of the few voices who advocates: * No immigration; * Downsize population; * Kill defectives; * Stop rampant technology.
– Pentti Linkola: EcoFascism.
I imagine if Satoshi Uematsu had been aware of the work being done by the Ecology of Peace culture; it is possible he may have chosen to invest his energy’s on humane death for those he considered ‘disabled’ and ‘overpopulation’ issues of concern in a more proactive lawful manner; in accordance to Ecology of Peace culture’s suggested legal methods for enabling honourable and transparent depopulation and deindustrializaiton return to ecological carrying capacity limits.
If parties consent to its filing into the court proceedings; the Ecology of Peace Amicus shall provide all parties and the court with the Ecology of Peace culture’s legal definition of ‘disabled’ with regard to procreation, consumption and communication behaviours – as detailed in among others Breeding & Consumption Crimes of Aggression and Deception Communication Crimes of Aggression points in the EoP Wealth Transfer Options to shut down Casino Ponzi Economy submission below, excerpted from SQSwans PRH: EoP Wealth Transfer Option – and its legal submissions to various national and international courts, regarding amending the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the international law social contract.
– EoP Leg Sub: JP v S Uematsu: 12 Oct: Inter-Pacific Bar Association: JP v S Uematsu EoP Amicus Request.
Responsible Fredom Informed Consent Cultural Law Self Rule, including for Nazi’s; who abide by EoP scientific law.
As noted in the correspondence – EoP response to Linda Ford – the Simple Justice EoP Scientific and Cultural Law suggested solution for inter-cutlural or racial resource conflict, allows for responsible freedom informed consent cultural law self rule: this allows groups of individuals who share a preference for a particular, racial, religious or social practice, and/or a preference for relating to others who share their preferential racial, cultural or religious practices; to live in separate tribal communities from others who don’t share their cultural practices; practicing self rule regulation of their cultural practices.
As noted at EoP v WiP Law:
Legal Tyranny of Vague Definitions: A Legal Tyranny occurs in family, community, nation, planet where the verbal and/or written social contract jurisprudence has vague and abstract legal definitions: particularly as relating to denying the members of the community clear and simple information on (a) the root causes of resource conflicts; (b) the communication and negotiations skills and tools to non-violently, if that is their preference, resolve resource conflict disputes that address the root causes of the resource conflict, and enable a win-win solution to the resource conflict dispute.
Simple Justice EoP Scientific and Cultural Law:
Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law is an effort to provide all families, communities, nations with a functional win-win resource conflict solving international law social contract template, that (a) is scientifically based upon the authority – not of men, women, race or religion – but scientific ecological carrying capacity limits, is so simple – breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits, and cheaters will be eliminated from commons genepool – it can be explained to a child or an adult, that western industrial educational system civilization considers ‘illiterate’; (b) allows for responsible freedom informed consent cultural law self rule: this allows groups of individuals who share a preference for a particular, racial, religious or social practice, and/or a preference for relating to others who share their preferential racial, cultural or religious practices; to live in separate tribal communities from others who don’t share their cultural practices; practicing self rule regulation of their cultural practices. The EoP scientific and cultural law template allows for diverse groups with many different cultural practices to live in neighbouring villages, nations; without inter-cultural or resource conflict, to the extent that they strictly hold each other, and the individuals within their tribes, accountable to abiding by scientific and cultural law social contract laws.
Ecology of Peace ism’s — like EoP law, religion, media, charity, psychology, academia, etc — are founded upon EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles; providing advocacy and information on how to cooperate to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by turning off the tap; — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, gender, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict and war; by implementing an EoP international law social contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future. [See: Michael Ruppert: Collapse; Community Solution: The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil; Thompkins Conservation: The Next Economy].
Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality in David Lane’s 14 words terminology:
EoP Scientific and Cultural Law is based upon EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles:
 Earth is not flat.
 Resources are finite.
 When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.
 Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
 The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.
 If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with Ecology of Peace clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.
Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles, stated in other racial, religious terminology:
In David Lane’s ‘14 words’:
We must legally protect the natural capital foundation of all life for all species; by implementing an EoP intnl law social contract; that limits all human procreation and consumption to ecological carrying capacity limits; thereby securing the indefinite existence future of our natural capital resource foundation for all responsible freedom cooperating humans from all races, classes, and religions.
In Tragedy of Commons Bible commandment:
Thou shalt not [promote, legislate, enforce or obey laws which enable human’s procreation or consumption to] transgress ecological carrying capacity limits. – [EoP Amended] Garrett Hardin
In Islamic Hadith:
An [EoP] Muslim eats [breeds & consumes] in one intestine; while a [WiP] Kafir eats [breeds & consumes] in seven intestines.” – [EoP Amended] al-Bukhari, al-Sahih, Hadith 6396. – IG: 17-06-08_eoprhfr-dlanetochadith.
– EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 29 Jun: EoP Thoughts Re: Martin van Creveld: A Modest Proposal & Nemesis.
EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations Reference to Nazi Wannssee Conference:
The EoP v WiP NWO Neg’s strategic and tactical question: Whom should the Military Kill, makes reference to the Nazi Party’s Wannseee Conference to clearly legally define ‘Who is and is not a Jew’ question:
The ‘Whom Should the Military Kill’ military strategic and tactical discussions – following on from EoP US Army Ft Bragg – are different and similar; to (a) South Africa’s Ending Apartheid negotiations between the ANC and the National Party, held between Thabo Mbeki and Willie Esterhuize, as depicted in the movie: Endgame: Trailer, based on Robert Harvey’s book The Fall of Apartheid. The negotiations were brokered by Michael Young, a British businessman who worked for Consolidated Gold Fields, and held at Mells Park House, a country house near Frome in Somerset, then owned by Consolidated Gold Fields; and (b) the Nazi Party’s Wannsee Conference, chaired by Reinhard Tristan Eugen Heydrich, held in the Berlin suburb of Wannsee on 20 January 1942, the purpose of which was to clearly legally define ‘Who is and is not a Jew’, in order to formalize plans for the Final Solution to the Jewish Question—the deportation and genocide of all Jews in German-occupied Europe.
Similarities and Differences:
Ending ANC & National Party Racial Apartheid:
The ANC and NP’s negotiation goals were to end apartheid, however their ‘End Apartheid’ negotiations failed – due to reasons not yet clarified – to address, and/or negotiate the root causes of apartheid resource conflict violence; namely the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of international law.
Ending EoP v WiP cultural apartheid, via EoP Truth & Reconciliation:
The EoP v WiP negotiations goals are to end economic, racial, religious, gender, academic, media, etc apartheid, via Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation: i.e. by addressing the root causes of racial, religious, gender, academic, media, etc resource conflict violence; namely: the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of international law; and taking responsibility to cooperate to implement Ecology of Peace intenational law.
Ecology of Peace legal and information negotiation recommendations, provide EoP scientific and cultural law advocacy on how and why to cooperate to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by ‘turning off the tap’ — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of resource conflict and war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order Social Contract that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.
Wannsee: Jewish Question Final Solution: Secret:
The Nazi Party’s Wannsee Conference – documented in Conspiracy: Introduction and Wannsee Conference – chaired by Reinhard Tristan Eugen Heydrich, held in the Berlin suburb of Wannsee on 20 January 1942, to clearly legally define ‘Who is and is not a Jew’, in order to formalize plans for the Final Solution to the Jewish Question—the deportation and genocide of all Jews in German-occupied Europe; were held in secret, Jews and Germans only found out about the negotiations years after the war.
ANC & National Party: End Apartheid: Secret:
The ANC and National Party’s End Apartheid Negotiations were secret, South African’s of all races only found out about them after the National Party and ANC agreed that they had allegedly ended apartheid.
EoP v WiP: Whom Should the Military Kill?: Not Secret:
EoP culture’s Final Solution to the Scarcity Combatant Question EoP v WiP negotiations are public, published and available online: EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations. Ecology of Peace legal submissions to court/s are also available in the court record – for example: SA Constitutional Court: The Citizen v Robert McBride – where the Judges and/or any other party consented to them being submitted for consideration to the issues in dispute in the proceedings. They are consequently publicly available to any individual of any race, religion or culture, journalist, editor, lawyer, judge, whom has been informed of their existence, for them to read and incorporate into their personal and/or professional relating values; to discuss and share the information with their family or community; and/or if sincere about non-violent resolution to resource conflict; to do whatever they can to cooperate; to implement an EoP Intnl law social contract.
Wannsee: Jewish Question Final Solution: White Supremacy Law:
The Nazi Party’s ‘Final Solution to the Jewish Question’ Negotiations recommendations were based upon racial Aryan supremacist ideology.
EoP v WiP: Who Should Military Kill Q: Ecological Carrying Capacity Supremacy Law:
EoP culture’s negotiations – and EoP scientific and cultural law Truth and Reconciliation Military Tribunal recommendations regarding whom should be killed, how, by whom and when – are based upon scientific ecological carrying capacity principles; and submitted to Scarcity Combatant Respondents as part of legal proceedings, to inform them of the Scarcity Combatant War Criminal charges against them; and how and what they can do to take responsibility and make amends for their former breeding/consumption war scarcity combatant lifestyles, by cooperating to implement an EoP Intnl law social contract.
EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations purpose is to provide EoP Axis military officials with a clear legal definition of an Eco Innocent and Scarcity Combatant – whether Jew, European, African, American, South African, Christian, Muslim, Catholic, Buddhist, communist, capitalist, nationalist, liberal, conservative, lawyer, judge, psychologist, farmer, janitor, teacher, or unemployed — so that their soldiers, or any civilians they conscript into militia’s; are clear – if or when they consider EoP Axis Military Necessity Evacuation or some similar form of ‘Military Final Solution’ necessary; for example: if EoP Legal Truth and Reconciliation Commission Legal/Military Tribunals – as suggested in Citizen v R McBride and EoP v Nobel are obstructed or fail – as to whom should not be killed and whom should be killed.
A transcript of all EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations correspondence regarding the Revolution of Military Ethics: Whom Should the Military Kill Question; can be found at EoP FT Bragg: Military Ethics Question.
– EoP Leg Sub: 21 Jul: Re: USCAAF Judges Ruling Re: EoP Amicus submission to USCAAF: #12-8027/AR: CCR v USA.
Conclusion: All ‘Human’ beings on Planet Earths EoP v WiP Future Decision Making:
As noted at: EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 07 Jul: Ron Jager .. Jason Greenblatt:
There are similarities between a culture or society with different tribes of individuals; and the micro-organisms in a compost heap.
In the microbial world of a compost heap, approximately 5% of the micro-organisms are defined as regenerative bacteria – those which heal, restore and enliven. On the other extreme, roughly 5% are defined as degenerative bacteria – those which break down, decompose and putrefy. Both ends of the spectrum perform important functions. The other 90% of microorganisms are generally neutral and will follow the lead of whichever alliance establishes dominance. The degenerative alliances are most predominant and essentially work on the principles of dominance, control, and suppression. Whereas the regenerative alliances work on the principles of partnership, cooperation, and empowerment. Rather than working on the principles of suppression, the regenerative alliances have the ability to enliven that broad-based 90% of neutral microbes, so that they begin performing the many functions that they were designed to perform. Adding a particular effective micro-organism to your compost heap, can tip the 90% neutral organisms either way. [EM Earth: History of Effective MicroOrganisms: Little Organisms, Big Revolution!]
“I’ll be cynical to say that society can be divided into two groups. There is the minority who are never happy with what they have, who are always searching and creating things; and there’s the majority, who work honestly and professionally. Those who lead and those who follow.” – Vladimir Guzinsky; The Rise and Fall of the Russian Oligarchs.
“I think it’s my mothers indomitable spirit. She’s World War II generation. I’ll give you a little insight. I didn’t put it in the film but while I interviewed her [Barbara Colby], we were talking about Iraq and Afghanistan; and she said ‘Where is my sacrifice? What am I being asked to do, where is my part in this war. If we are at war, give me something to do, and maybe I should ration; or maybe I should go and visit the VA hospital or wrap bandages. If I am part of this, where is my sacrifice?’. – Carl Colby; CSpan: Q & A: Carl Colby.
All racial, religious or ideological socio-culture’s composed of humans, have a small percentage of individuals focused on cooperation, partnership and empowerment, and another percentage of individuals focused on domination, control and suppression; and the other 90% of neutral humans whose life-goals are simple: With access to land, using their own labour, they are capable of being happy and satisfying their Maslow Hiearchy of Needs — Physiological, Safety, Love and Belonging, Esteem and Self Actualization – without exceeding ecological carrying capacity limits. Have you ever seen the wooden lace windows in a Russian village?; or watched the Community Solution documentary: The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil?. See also: IGN: Community Self Sufficiency: Rural Off Grid Russians Unphased by Economic Collapse. These simple people can be tipped either way; towards cooperative rationing sharing and problem solving, or mass hoarding hysteria mobjustice, looting or mass murder. For example: Consider the Japanese cooperative rationing sacrifice and sharing during the Fukushima earthquake; vs their gang raping, pillaging and mass murder; during the rape of Nanking.
Similarly, a family, village, region, nation or planet confronting SS DEFCON 2: Scarcity Conflict; the neutral majority can be led by their racial, religious, class or cultural leaders towards sincere root cause problem solving rationing – including of procreation, production and consumption – and equitable sharing of available resources use below ecological carrying capacity limits; or they can be led to mass hoarding hysteria mobjustice looting and race, class and religious war; and looking the other way, while their family members, neighbors, members of their church, are carted off to concentration camp ovens; simply because they belonged to the wrong race, religion, gender, or class.
Constructive Criticism Errors of Logic or Reasoning:
If you wish to provide your national socialist perspective submission to the EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations strategic and tactical question: ‘Whom should the Military Kill’; you are welcome to do so.
If you notice any errors of logic or reasoning; in any of the Ecology of Peace foundational concepts – the foundation upon which Ecology of Peace scientific and cultural law values are based – or any language that is ambiguous and can be made clearer and more simple, I would appreciate it if you could provide such constructive criticism written feedback; so that I can make any corrections, if so required.
My communication policy values are available at: EoP ADR: Ego and Eco Literacy.
A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at EoP v WiP NWO Neg.
Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk