14 Aug: John Prados: McMaster’s Un-Appropriate Dereliction.

* John Prados.
* 14 Aug: John Prados: McMaster’s Un-Appropriate Dereliction.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP Ft Bragg: Resp Freedom DB / EoP NWO SWO: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Academia / Military Gospel / EoP v WiP Neg.


John Prados: McMaster’s Un-Appropriate Dereliction: Comment: Edit Comment:

Apologies Edit for clarity:

Re: “Generals are trained in deterrence and in the tenets of credibility.”

I presume you are referring to American Generals. If so, why have American Generals – excluding a very few such as those at EoP Applicants [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za] – done so little about implementing an Ecology of Peace international law social contract [eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za]; which would massively reduce all nations standing armies, down to citizen militias; thereby demonstrating that they give a goddamn fuck about not only deterrence credibility; but the sustainable preservation of the ecological resource foundation of all of life?

For Your Info: Pacific Standard: Americans Aren’t the World: Joe Henrich and his colleagues are shaking the foundations of psychology and economics—and hoping to change the way social scientists think about human behavior and culture.

Different cultures have different levels of buck stops here honesty, honour or alternatively fuck honour suck my fragile ego tenets of credibility socio-cultural values; whereby they judge whether their or any other nations generals, politicians, religious leaders, etc are credible or not.

I don’t know any other American president whom the third world – people in the street, not the fuck honour media intelligentsia – would consider was ‘credible’; in terms of their promises. The non-western world is littered with individuals – probably more of them over time, than there are plastic shit in the ocean’s garbage patches – who have been fucked over by America’s fuck honour pretend we give a fuck about credibility fake ‘leadership’ promises. Excluding the EoP Applicants, America has no ‘honour’ leadership credibility; all of America’s leadership credibility is based upon Pentagon force projection; and when that collapses, so too will American citizens  illusions about ‘American leadership’.

Donald Trump – like most KKKi$$er Americans – lies allot, Donald Trump more overtly so; which obviously exposes the covert KKKi$$er liars, as liars, and hence upsets them so.

Ultimately if you seriously and sincerely want to judge another individual’s actions; you have to know what their motivations are. If you think a particular General is motivated by honour, and they really are motivated by money, or ego; then you will incorrectly interpret their actions, because your assumption as to their motivations are, will be incorrect. Only if you know what their motivations are, can you accurately judge whether their actions are credible, in terms of accomplishing that particular goal. If you think they want to drive to X, and they really are driving to Y, then your criticism of them for driving towards Y, and not X, is not justified or credible, since they are in fact driving towards their goal, not yours.

Cultural Decline as Result of Lack of Honour – Russian Proverb: Better Slapped with the Truth, than Kissed with a Lie: The decline of any culture is a result of cultural / religious failure to prioritize the value of honour/honesty. Honesty with others – whatever their race, religion or gender — is not possible; if there is a lack of honesty with self. Honesty is not possible with self; if the ego is afraid of confronting inconvenient facts.  As noted at Ecology of Peace summary of Masonic War is Peace history and NASA Handy studies: In the case of humans on planet earth; our endless resource war social and cultural conflict problems are the result of our ego and ecological illiterate failure to confront the – right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits – clauses of international law. Better to be slapped with the truth, than kissed with a lie. – Russian Proverb
— EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 28 May: Alt Right: Council of European Canadians … Vox Popoli.

For the record, I don’t know what General McMaster’s motivations are; he used to be an EoP Applicant [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za].

I don’t know to what extent President Obama and/or Trump’s ‘peacenik’ campaigning intentions were sincere or buttfuck the fuck honour dumber than dumbfuck American public bullshit the public relations verbal diarhea electioneering whoring.

To the extent that either may have been ignorantly sincere about the reality that peace with Russia, China, Iran, Syria and North Korea could only be achieved by addressing the root cause – right to breed/consume clauses of Intnl law – of planetary resource conflict; I have done what I could to encourage their Obama and Trump Democratic and Republican Party ‘peacenik’ voters to prove their ‘peacenik vote’ support for their ‘peace’ candidate; by signing responsible peacenik freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oaths.

I have not come across omy Obama or Trump voters who consider the responsible peacenik freedom information I submitted to them, credible enough for them to sincerely and actively listen to.

As noted at EoP Leg Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za] Official State Responses, I have come across a few generals and judges who consider responsible peacenik freedom information submitted to them, credible enough for them to sincerely and actively listen to.

Some people – such as Justice Thurgood Marshall – listen to constructive criticism, facts and evidence, based upon the quality of the factual evidence; irrespective of the racial, religious, class, gender etc status of the individual sharing the facts and evidence.

Other people – such as Brene Brown – only listen to constructive criticism information if the individual sharing the constructive criticism or information is a member of a particular – racial, religious or class – group; i.e. the individual’s status, not the quality of constructive criticism information is of importance to her.

I prefer the Thurgood Marshall approach. I care about sincerity and facts.

I don’t care about status, I once told a Bavarian Fursten/Princess Gloria von Thurn and Taxis, whose von Thurn and Taxis royal yacht S.Y. Aiglon I was employed upon – I was the first woman ever hired to serve on SY Aiglon, the only former individuals hired were German military officials, and an American: Kenny Libby – to go fuck herself and shove her job up her ass. The woman had a fucking fit about a small crease on her t-shirt that had not been completely ironed out; while I was working 16-18 hour days, including doing all housekeeping, night watches, etc. The captain turned the yacht around and dropped me off at the last port of call, and I went to find another job where the employer values honesty, sincerity and hard work; not slavery.

EoP MILED Clerk correspondence to Pentagon military historian Robert Kaplan regarding ‘credible experts’.

Off the cuff summary of EoP perspective of credible expert ethics characteristics:

My concern regarding the credibility of any individual’s – expert or self taught – information; is the quality of their evidence in context; which as far as I can tell is a consequence of their (a) sincere commitment to truthseeking on the particular issue; i.e. when provided with evidence contradicting a particular hypothesis to sincerely investigate it and if proven correct; to take responsibility for admitting their mistake; and (b) to consider their working hypothesis conclusion within context.

An alleged expert who refuses to (a) sincerely consider and examine contrarian evidence, including contextual evidence; (b) admit a mistake; if or when provided with evidence that contradicts a pillar of their evidence upholding their particular working hypothesis conclusion; has an agenda that is not truthseeking, but something else; whether ego careerism, self deception about his commitment to truthseeking, etc.

A ‘problem solving’ expert has additional responsibilities; such as es to (a) enquire into the root causes of the particular problem they are representing themselves as an expert at solving; (b) when root cause problem is discovered, honestly communicate such root cause problem they are alleged experts at solving; (c) once the root cause has been shared with the client; determining whether there is sufficient will to eliminate the root causes of the problem.

If the client is a large organization such as a corporation or state for example; the problem solving issue is more complicated; and depends on numerous factors; such as for example: will of the ‘strategic decision-maker’; their advisors, etc.

If a problem solving experts individual client is not sincere about problem solving the particular problem; a sincere problem solving expert should confront the client with the possibility that they are not sincere; but only engaged in a bullshit the public relations image management exercise; and if the client is not wiling to demonstrate their sincere commitment to problem solving; terminate their problem solving expertise towards such client as not being sincerely interested in problem solving their particular problem; until such client changes their mind, if ever.

Generally speaking such a client would – consciously or unconsciously — not really want the problem solved, they only want to pretend to be solving the problem, so they can market themelves as an alleged ‘problem solver’ for socio-political or economic profits; while actually unconsciously or consciously deliberately and covertly perpetuating the problem for thier own political and/or economic profits. They are parasitically covertly profiteering off not solving the problem; while overtly and publicly pretending to be concerned about helping to solve the problem.

[..] If however two individuals strategic intelligence goals are not the same; then their ultimate strategic intelligence path is different.

Homer Lea was intent on exposing the impending war consequences; but failed to clearly and simply – in buck stops here simple english a village idiot could understand — articulate the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits root causes of overpopulation and overconsumption converging lines of resource acquisition for growing consumption and procreation self-interest and aggrandizement.

To the extent that he was conscious of such failure to clarify the root causes; and advise those he was advising to cooperate with other nations, races and religions to address the root ‘right to breed and consume’ clauses of international law causes of war; to that extent his goals were not to honestly educate about how to end war and implement peace; but ego parasitic profiteering of pretending to solve the ‘war’ problem orientated.

To the extent that he was unconscious of such failure to clarify the root causes; and if someone had confronted him and informed him of such failure and he was (a) receptive to the constructive criticism, enquired into it; and admitted his mistakes; and altered his strategic intelligence goals advisory policy; his strategic intelligence goals would have been root cause problem solving orientated; or (b) not receptive to the constructive criticism, ignored or silenced the constructive criticism; his strategic intelligence goals would have been ego parasitic profiteering of pretending to solve problems orientated.

Its possible nobody ever provided Homer Lea with constructive criticism advise to clearly clarify the root causes of the problem he was allegedly focussed on solving; and engage in an enquiry whether there was sufficient political will to address those root causes; which could be because of many reasons: (a) he did not surround himself with; or had not found or was not even looking for; a or sufficient sincere buck stops here truthseekers to be his advisors (b) of the sincere truthseekers around at that time; on the planet; none of them were focussed on the truthseeking the particular problems Homer Lea was focussed on addressing; and consequently none of them had arrived at the root cause of the problem, and consequently the root cause of the particular problem had not been discovered.
– EoP v WiP NWO Neg [eop-v-wip.tygae.org.za]: 24 Oct 2016: Homer Lea Research Center, Homer Lea Site: EoP Amended Quote of Homer Lea; Response to Lawrence Kaplan Re: Bio Homer Lea ref to The Swarming of the Slavs.

A copy of this comment shall be posted at eop-v-wip.tygae.org.za.