15 Sep: EoP Response to Counterpunch: Looking for Lost Sincerity on the Liberal Left

* Kim Domenica … Ellen Rutten
» Kim Domenica, Ellen Rutten, Brad Blanton, Ray Dalio, Nicholas Lowry, Steven Heller, Sean Guillory, Charles Duhigg, Jared Taylor, Dmitri Prigov, Mikhail Epstein, ASEEES, James Barrett, Orest Boichuk, Will Evans, Vladimir Druk, Juliet Tomasi, Ian Dudley
* 15 Sep: EoP Response to Counterpunch: Looking for Lost Sincerity on the Liberal Left.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v B Blanton, EoP v R Dalio  / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Psych / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:10 PM
Subject: EoP Response to Counterpunch: Looking for Lost Sincerity on the Liberal Left.
To: “The Other Side Cafe Domenica: Kim Domenica” <contact@theothersideutica.org>
Cc: Ellen Rutten <ellen.rutten@uva.nl>

The Other Side Cafe Domenica: Kim Domenica (contact@theothersideutica.org)
CC: Ellen Rutten (ellen.rutten@uva.nl); @ellenrutten

EoP Response to Counterpunch: Looking for Lost Sincerity on the Liberal Left.

Re: Counterpunch: Looking for Lost Sincerity on the Liberal Left and Sean’s Russia Blog: Searching for Post Communist Sincerity.

I am the EoP MILED Clerk on behalf of EoP Applicants whose preferences – aka what do we want – are available at Eco & Ego Literacy.

Re: EoP Culture Definition of Sincerity.

In the Ecology of Peace culture [eop-rh-cult-info.tygae.org.za] sincerity is equivalent to ego/eco-literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za].

I am sincerely interested in root cause problem solving of resource conflict disputes. If the reality on planet earth is that I am the only dumbfuck village idiot sincerely concerned about abolishing the root – right to breed/consume above ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of of international law – causes of all racial, religious, ideological and gender conflicts; I have no problem shutting the fuck up, and fucking off from this fuck honour Masonic infested planet.

My working hypothesis is that the range of sincerity/ego literate to insincere/ego illiterate individuals in any racial, religious, gender or ideological identity group of individuals would include: (i) sincere/ego literate, (ii) pretending to be sincere/ego literate; some of whom could be potentially sincere/ego literate and some of whom could be covert couldn’t-give-a-fuck-about-sincerity/ego literacy; and (iii) overt insincere couldn’t-give-a-fuck-about-sincerity/ego literacy; some of whom potentially could have become overt couldn’t-give-a-fuck-about-sincerity, due to the lack of a clear legal definition of what exactly the abstract concept of sincerity means.

According to Dr Blanton, a WiP psychologist whose concern for honesty resulted in him naming his therapy practice: Radical Honesty – Brad Blanton; Radical Honesty 01,02,03; The Importance of Telling the Radical Truth – most adults lie all the time, presumably not only to others, but also to themselves and are pretending to themselves and others; that they are not pretending about what they want.

Dr Blanton, and to a lesser extent Dr. Blanton’s ‘Radical Honesty Trainers’ are the only individuals considering themselves liberal leftists, whom I had significant contact with. As noted in – 06 Nov: Timothy J McVeigh: Formal Apology: Re: Fraud of Radical Honesty Cult – one of the reasons for me initially joining the Radical Honesty cult, was that I believed in Brad Blanton and the Radical Honesty cult’s sincerity about practicing honesty and the use of practicing honesty to reach forgiveness enabling cooperative truthseeking of racial, religious and class resource conflict solving. Later I found out that my belief in their sincerity was inaccurate; hence my written apologies.

An EoP sincere aka ego literate individual would judge any person they came into contact with based upon that individual’s sincerity/ego literacy; not the racial, religious or ideological WiP group they consciously or unconsciously considered themselves a member of.

Put simply EoP sincerity/Eco/Ego literacy is focussed on addressing the root causes of resource conflict problems.

I don’t know what your definition of sincerity is; but if any of that is of interest to you, for further discussion enquiry, let me know.

If not: Perhaps Ellen Rutten may have a similar definition of sincerity to yourself. She was interviewed about her perspective of sincerity on Sean’s Russia Blog: Searching for Post Communist Sincerity.

I did notify Ms. Rutten of the EoP ego/eco literacy definition of sincerity via twitter, if she was interested in further enquiry.

EoP MILED Clerk: 09 Jun 2017: 22:40 hrs: @TarikCyrilAmar @seansrussiablog @ellenrutten @AATSEEL_Tweets EoP Re sincerity/authenticity = ego/eco literacy. http://eop-v-wip-psych.tygae.org.za @pussyrrriot @tolokno @MashaAlekhina pic.twitter.com/96Hlun3ik4 [IG: 17-04-22_eop-v-wip-academia; 17-06-08_eoprhfr-dlanetochadith]

Ms. Rutten did not respond, plausibly not interested in ego/eco literacy sincerity; but perhaps she may be interested in your definition of sincerity, whatever it is.

The enemy of EoP sincerity truthseeking problem solving is Bullshit the Public Relations:

I do not give a-flying-fuck-about bullshit the public relations. I do recognize that this is a big priority for many individuals, who consider themselves liberal left. Their method of recruiting economic or military cannon fodder; for their pretend we give a fuck about problem solving ideological organizations; is via bullshit the public relations.

“I do hope the alt-right doesn’t figure it out. An image is worth a thousand words, and if they do figure out how to do PR, it won’t bode well for the rest of us.” – Nicholas Lowry
The left was very good at [PR], before the right was good at it. – Steven Heller
– Newsweek: The plot to paper college campuses with racist posters.

Frankly, if sincerity and/or truthseeking of relationships is a priority for an individual; or group of individuals in a particular organization; then I would imagine PR, spin is very high on the enemies list; because PR is toxic to sincere truthseeking relationships. It causes infighting, backstabbing, competitiveness, which obstructs cooperation, ambiguity about strategic and tactical goals.

To me, if I don’t let everyone see everything with the tapes, its the equivalent of creating spin. In other words, why wouldn’t you let them see? If you are going to have an idea meritocracy, they should be able to see everything and ask questions. It raises interesting questions, gets them a sense of real reality. That also causes them to be bought in, cause there’s no spin. There is no talking behind anybody’s back. When you put things out in the open and everybody looks at it. You know bad things happen in the dark. … A lot of people just want sugarcoating. You have to be as accurate as possible. They have to be as accurate with you as possible.  That you have to create a system that is not just an exchange of mutual feedback, but data collection. So if people are doing certain things, we can correlate if it is being done well or not. If people believe that there is a fair system, an idea meritocracy,  where the evidence becomes clear that you are that kind of a person. As long as you have a system that people believe is fair, and is being accurate about someone being that kind of a person. Thats not true that everyone wants that, because not everybody wants to stand naked infront of everybody. So its a little bit like going ito a nudist camp for the first time. Its very awkward. Everyobody’s looking around, but before you know it you are talking about interesting subjects and you don’t pay attention to being naked. If you can stand naked infront of other people and have them stand naked infront of you, you can have better relationships and be more productive. It is about getting over that emotional reaction [to being vulnerable]. Your logical self wants it, but your emotional self doesn’t. Its about getting your logical self and your emotional self together. … If you don’t have radical transparency; you are going to have a lot more problems. So by making everything transparent you are going to have less lying, you are going to have less problems. Everyone is going to understand better. Isn’t it better to be that way?  –  New York Times: Ray Dalio: The Culture Principle.

I simply don’t think that ideologically Abner Louima buttfucking any individual with bullshit the public relations crap, to recruit them to cooperate on any project is a good idea.

However, if others do; they are welcome to sign up to any group offering them racial, religious or ideological Abner Louima buttfucking bullshit the public relations shit sandwich crap.

A copy of this correspondence will be documented at EoP v WiP Neg.


Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk


Transparency Notices via Twitter

Brad Blanton: @radbrad68; Ray Dalio: @RayDalio; Nicholas Lowry: @NichoLowry; Steve Heller:@thedailyheller; Sean Guillory: @seansrussiablog; Charles DuHigg: @cduhigg; Jared Taylor: @jartaylor; Dmitri Prigov: @dmitri_prigov; Mikhail Epstein: @MikhailEpstein; ASEEES: @aseeestudies; James Barrett: @JimBarrett; Orest Boichuk: @ORKO000ORKO; Will Evans: 2willevans; Vladimir Druk: @vladimir_druk; Juliet Tomasi: @JulietTomasi; Ian Dudley: @Ian_A_Dudley

EoP MILED Clerk: 15 Sep 2017: 21:26 hrs: @ellenrutten EoP corr 4 u http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2017/09/15-sep-kim-domenica/ cc @radbrad68 @RayDalio @NichoLowry @thedailyheller @seansrussiablog @cduhigg @jartaylor

EoP MILED Clerk: 15 Sep 2017: 21:50 hrs: EoP re Lost Left sincerity @dmitri_prigov @MikhailEpstein @aseeestudies @JimBarrett @ORKO000ORKO @willevans @vladimir_druk @JulietTomasi
» Retweet of EoP MILED Clerk: 15 Sep 2017: 21:26 hrs: @ellenrutten EoP corr 4 u http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2017/09/15-sep-kim-domenica/ cc @radbrad68 @RayDalio @NichoLowry @thedailyheller @seansrussiablog @cduhigg @jartaylor