* Jonathan Zimmerman … Albemarle Co VA Police.
» Jonathan Zimmerman, Amy Wax, Larry Alexander, Regina Austin, William A. Schnader, Tom Baker, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, William Wilson Bratton, NYU Graduate School of Education, National Review, Mona Charen, Antifa, Its Going Down, Alt Right, Eli Mosley, VA Albemarle County Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office, Albemarle Co VA Police.
* 20 Sep: EoP culture re: Trump, Charlottesville ‘cultural relativism’; price of bourgeois culture, etc.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: US v C Cantwell, EoP USPD / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Media / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:46 AM
Subject: EoP culture re: Trump, Charlottesville ‘cultural relativism’; price of bourgeois culture, etc.
To: “UPenn: Jonathan Zimmerman” <email@example.com>, Amy Wax <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Larry Alexander <email@example.com>, Regina Austin <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Tom Baker <email@example.com>, Shyamkrishna Balganesh <firstname.lastname@example.org>, William Wilson Bratton <email@example.com>
Cc: Antifa via Its Going Down <firstname.lastname@example.org>
TO: Jonathan Zimmerman, Amy Wax, Larry Alexander, Penn Law Professors & Nat Rev: Ms. Charen:
UPenn: Jonathan Zimmerman (email@example.com); Amy Wax (firstname.lastname@example.org); Larry Alexander (email@example.com); Regina Austin, William A. Schnader Professor of Law (firstname.lastname@example.org); Tom Baker, William Maul Measey Professor of Law and Health Sciences (email@example.com); Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Professor of Law (firstname.lastname@example.org); William Wilson Bratton, Nicholas F. Gallicchio Professor of Law (email@example.com); NYU: Graduate School of Education: @nyusteinhardt; National Review Mona Charen: @monachareneppc;
Antifa via Its Going Down (firstname.lastname@example.org); @IGD_News; Alt Right: Eli Mosley: @ThatEliMosley; VA Albemarle County Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office via Albemarle Co VA Police: @ACPD_VA
Ref: US/VA v Chris Cantwell.
Mr. Zimmerman, Ms Wax et al:
EoP culture re: Trump, Charlottesville ‘cultural relativism’; price of bourgeois culture, etc.
Herewith some EoP perspectives to Salon: Trump, Charlottesville and the perils of “cultural relativism”; Philadelphia Inquirer: Paying the price for breakdown of the country’s bourgeois culture; Salon: Donald Trump, Jews and the myth of race: How Jews gradually became “white,” and how that changed America; Daily Pennsylvanian: Guest Column by 33 Penn Law faculty members | Open letter to the University of Pennsylvania community; National Review: Leftists Feed Extremists They Fear with Attacks on Amy Wax; and Brainwaves Video Anthology: Too Hot to Handle: A Global History of Sex Education.
Donald Trump just can’t help himself. Shortly after the violent clashes last month in Charlottesville, where a demonstrator was killed by a neo-Nazi, Trump seemed to equate white supremacists with the protesters who assembled to challenge them. He was back at it again last Wednesday, when he told Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina — the lone African-American Republican in the Senate — that there were “bad dudes” on both sides of the Charlottesville battle.
That’s like comparing a few bad apples that you bought last week to a mountain of rancid oranges, piled up over four centuries. Although several black-clad “antifa” vigilantes attacked the white supremacists, that hardly made the two groups of protesters in Charlottesville into moral equals. One was fighting for racism and the other was fighting against it.
– Salon: Trump, Charlottesville and the perils of “cultural relativism”
To the extent that Mr. Zimmerman, Ms Wax & Mr Alexander and individuals in the Alt Right and Antifa share WiP – ‘we demand our WiP intnl law right to breed/consume above ecological carrying capacity limits’ – cultural values; you are all indeed consciously or unconsciously responsible for overpopulation/consumption’s collision with finite resource reality; the result of which is racial, religious, economic resource conflict; i.e. that which you complain about and blame on each other or groups other than your own racial or religious or ideological group’s overbreeding/consumption practices.
If unconsciously, your actions are probably the result of you having been brainwashed by WiP Media [eop-v-wip-media.tygae.org.za], Academia [eop-v-wip-academia.tygae.org.za] and/or religion [eop-v-wip-religion.tygae.org.za] coverup of the root – right to breed and consume above ecological carrying capacity clauses of WiP Intnl law [eop-v-wip-law.tygae.org.za] – causes of overpopulation/consumption’s collision with finite resource reality; manifesting as among others racial, religious and class resource war conflict.
EoP Responsible Freedom Root Cause Problem Solving:
The Ecology of Peace culture advocates on behalf of the implementation [eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za] of EoP – EoP scientific and cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] – international law; that would require all the worlds citizens of all nations, races and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za], and relate to others in terms of fully informed consenting agreements; and if convicted of violations of EoP scientific and cultural law [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za], to be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool
If any of you are interested in cooperating in responsible freedom root cause problem solving; or wish to encourage your students to cooperate in responsible freedom root cause problem solving; or wish to support American political or legal officials with a responsible freedom mandate to begin official negotiations to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; you are welcome to sign your responsible freedom oaths [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za].
EoP suggested EoP TRC Resolution of Antifa v Alt Right Dispute:
EoP MILED Clerk – on behalf of EoP Applicants – did offer to support any Alt Right and/or Antifa individuals who may be sincere about addressing the root causes of all racial, religious and class conflict:
Re: US v Chris Cantwell: EoP v WiP Law.
Chris and Antifa via Its Going Down:
Ecology of Peace culture has submitted various Ecology of Peace Amicus [Friend of the Court] briefs – focussing on providing the disputing parties in the particular case with the option of resolving the dispute by means of Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation root cause problem solving; for example: The Citizen v Robert McBride – to courts around the world.
If Chris and/or Antifa would like to consider providing the court with the option of resolving the resource conflict dispute between you, by means of Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation root cause problem solving; please let me know; and we can discuss me filing an EoP Amicus to the court in your case.
A Summary of Official State Responses to prior EoP Legal Submissions is at Official State Responses.
There was no response from the Alt Right and/or Antifa, indicating that any individuals in the Alt Right and/or Antifa were interested in resolving their dispute by means of EoP root cause problem solving.
I do not know whether the Alt Right or Antifa individuals who received the EoP correspondence, shared it with their fellow Alt Right/Antifa members; or not.
RE: Antifa’s ‘Anti Racism’.
I don’t know what Antifa’s definition of ‘racism’ is.
EoP Re: Racism Definition:
Thank God for Donald Trump! He is one of the dumbest fucking liars of all time and therefore the potential savior of America and the World! Donald Trump is a hero because he is an incredible fool and even shit -for -brains dumb asses who are almost as ignorant as he is can see what a lying stupid sonofabitch he is. He works at it. And he doesn’t know when to quit and he can’t stop and he can’t be stopped by anyone else or by learning anything new. – Dr. Brad Blanton; Radical Honesty: Secrecy is Lying, Secret Agencies are Bullshit, Diplomats are Liars, and Everyone is Full of Shit.
» EoP Leg Sub: 27 Aug: EoP TRC Responsible Freedom Psych Path to Sustainable Future; Duty to Warn Psych v DJ Trump.
‘Remember God made men equal” – William Wilberforce; Amazing Grace.
“How can I hold that all men are created equal when here before me stands, stinking, the moral carcass of the gentleman from Ohio, proof that some men are inferior, endowed by their Maker with dim wits, impermeable to [responsible-freedom] reason, with cold, pallid slime in their veins instead of hot, red blood! You are more [I demand my WiP Intnl law right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits] reptile than man, George! So low and flat that the foot of man is incapable of crushing you. How dare you? Yet even you, Pendleton, who should have been gibbeted for [breeding/consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits] treason long before today. Even worthless, unworthy you ought to be treated equally before the law! And so again, sir, again and again and again I say, I do not hold with equality in all things, only with equality before the [EoP scientific and cultural law] law.” – [EoP Amended] Thaddeus Stevens; Lincoln.
» IG: 17-04-14_nixonlincolnlea-reptilewareconomysystem.
The military has been concerned about oil dependence for decades. This isn’t some newly green military. When they do have to fight a war, they want to mitigate risks to their personnel & equipment. Eight presidents have declared addiction to foreign oil a threat to national security. That would mean anyone using foreign oil is aiding & abetting an enemy. Anyone, who doesn’t aggressively cut oil consumption to within domestic production is technically committing treason.” – Andrew Holland, senior fellow for energy and climate policy at the non-partisan American Security Project; Yes: The Real Reason the Military is Going Green.
» IG: 17-04-15_ecologicalovershootiscriminal.
The Ecology of Peace culture’s legal definition of racism was submitted in legal documentation to the case of US/Florida v Michael Dunn; a summary of which can be found in EoP Infographic: 15-09-27_racismdefinition:
Role of Subjective Belief and Objective Reality in Racial / Cultural / Religious Supremacy
Subjective belief: an idea believed by a person, which can be objectively true or false.
SUPREMACIST: In order for a subjective belief to be ‘racial/religious/cultural’ supremacy’ (i.e. falsely supremacist: morally unethical); it must be both (a) insincerely held, and (b) objectively false.
NOT SUPREMACIST: Sincere aka ego literate: the person sincerely holds a belief about white/blacks being superior (generally) or specifically in any particular skill, and if objectively false, the person has no personal experience evidence it is untrue. [Example A KKK/BPP member, who has never had the personal experience opportunity to meet an honourable – aka ego/eco literate honest – black/white man, sincerely could believe all blacks/whites are liars, dishonest, etc.]
SUPREMACIST: Insincere: The person believes an idea about Muslims/Christians being superior (generally) or in a particular skill; even though (a) they have met a Atheist/Jew who has proven their supremacy idea to be false; yet they refuse – presumably for reasons of ego illiteracy – to amend their opinion to reflect the new information, and insist on their supremacy idea; which (b) is both subjectively and objectively false.
OBJECTIVE REALITY: impartial scientific evidence for whether any idea is true or false.
“White Men are generally speaking technolgically speaking superior to black men.”
African American men are generally speaking superior to white men in basketball.”
“Serena Williams is superior to 99% of white, black, asian women at tennis.”
“Traditional bushmen culture is superior to European, Asian & African culture at living sustainably”.
If objectively TRUE, such statements are NOT RACIAL SUPREMACIST.
For example: Bushmen culture would not be considered generally speaking superior by individuals who consider warlike cultures superior, only to individuals who consider sustainable cultural lifestyle superior.
White men/women are generally speaking racially superior [Objectively untrue, but may be subjectively sincere]
Black men/women are generally speaking racially superior [Objectively untrue, but may be subjectively sincere]
If subjectively SINCERE, such a statement is NOT RACIAL SUPREMACIST.
Re: Alt Right: ‘White Race survival or White Race slavery’ advocacy?:
Personally, I don’t care much for any individual’s racial or religious identity. I do care about, and value ego/eco literacy honesty.
I’d rather live next to a sincere and honest EoP scientific law abiding cannibal – who practiced fully informed consenting cannibalism like Armin Meiwes [Barcroft TV: Interview with a Cannibal] – than next to a WiP ‘right to breed/consume steal your resources’ University Professor or Antifa/Alt Right activist two faced hypocrite; pretending they are ‘educating their students’ or advocating on behalf of ‘white survival’ or ‘anti-racism’ when all they are doing is consciously or unconsciously upholding WiP ‘right to breed/consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits; resource thieving; while endlessly whining about the racial, religious and class resource conflict consequences of WiP Intnl law.
Besides culling overbreeders/consumers; the implementation of EoP Intnl law would result in a form of eugenics that enabled individuals – of whatever race or religion – addicted to deception, manipulation, etc to cull themselves from the planetary genepool [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; once they repeatedly violated fully informed consent laws. Ultimately, EoP Intnl law would enable a much more honest society. In a society currently drowning in bullshit the public verbal diarrhea two faced hypocrisy; one can only imagine what the socio-cultural – cooperation and co-creation of existential meaning and purpose – results would be of living in a society that rewards honesty and honour.
The process of implementing EoP Intnl law would require individuals to prioritize honesty and cooperative root cause problem solving to themselves and others, which ultimately may result in a conscious or unconscious shift in such individuals identity values from racial/religious primary identity values to honour primary identity values, with race, religion or ideology as secondary to honour.
The ultimate outcome of EoP Intnl law is a society where everyone’s primary identity value is honour identity. The outcome of secondary identity values could result in the society being 9 or 90% European, or Asian, or Catholic, or Muslim, depending on how many of those individuals adopt honourable cooperative problem solving as their primary identity.
If American, European and South African white supremacists sincerely believe they prefer (a) nonviolent honourable problem solving; (b) think that they are biologically sexually superior to non-europeans; why are they not supporting the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; that would – according to their beliefs about black sexual inferiority [I personally know poor non-european women who grew up in South African ghetto’s; who were quite capable of sexual impulse control to be virgins by the age of 26, when they got married]; — result in the humane and orderly elimination of more than 90% of non-europeans from the planet?
So when you hand South African, American and European white supremacists; the opportunity to honourably, ethically, legally and humanely rid the world of 90% of non-europeans [according to their white supremacist beliefs about blacks ‘chimping out’, lacking sexual impulse control, etc]; and their response is: Thanks, but no thanks, what is going on?
Do white supremacists secretly think their own white supremacists friends and followers lack sexual impulse control; to practice responsible freedom breeding and consumption; and/or do they prefer to masochistically and maliciously profiteer of non-european resource conflict misery and cheap labour; closet slavery supremacists; but Jews are the parasites; that need to be sent to concentration camp ovens? Or what is going on?
– Lara Johnstone; paraphrased statement made to [friend], during a discussion about whether Afriforum do good work on behalf of South African farmers.
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 Jul: EoP Re: Patching it Up with Putin; Liberal Jews to Israel: Do It Our Way or Else.
If you are so confident that your ‘white’ race is ethically and/or sexual or consumption restraint and/or ‘justice for all orientated’ superior; why would you be afraid of, or obstruct, or censor, the discussion, or legal applications, advocating on behalf of the implementation of EoP Intnl law?
Superior and Inferior Cultures, in the context of Suicidal Economies:
All cultures are not equal. Or at least they are not equal in preparing people to be productive in an advanced economy. – Amy Wax; The Inquirer: Paying the price for breakdown of the country’s bourgeois culture.
The decline of any culture is a result of cultural / religious failure to prioritize the value of honour/honesty. Honesty with others – whatever their race, religion or gender — is not possible; if there is a lack of honesty with self. Honesty is not possible with self; if the ego is afraid of confronting inconvenient facts. As noted at Ecology of Peace summary of Masonic War is Peace history and NASA Handy studies: In the case of humans on planet earth; our endless resource war social and cultural conflict problems are the result of our ego and ecological illiterate failure to confront the – right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits – clauses of international law. Better to be slapped with the truth, than kissed with a lie. – Russian Proverb
— EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 28 May: Alt Right: Council of European Canadians … Vox Popoli.
If by ‘advanced economy’ you mean superior at suicidal destruction of the planet, and all of the ecosystem resources required for the healthy sustenance of life; then I would agree; industrial civilization economy is superior at fuck honour suicidal destruction of the planet.
Over the past few decades, the term“Anthropocene” has climbed out of academic discourse and into the popular imagination — a name given to the geologic era we live in now, and a way to signal that it is a new era, defined on the wall chart of deep history by human intervention. One problem with the term is that it implies a conquest of nature (and even echoes the biblical “dominion”). And however sanguine you might be about the proposition that we have already ravaged the natural world, which we surely have, it is another thing entirely to consider the possibility that we have only provoked it, engineering first in ignorance and then in denial a climate system that will now go to war with us for many centuries, perhaps until it destroys us. That is what Wallace Smith Broecker, the avuncular oceanographer who coined the term “global warming,” means when he calls the planet an “angry beast.” You could also go with “war machine.” Each day we arm it more.
– New York Magazine: Doomed Earth Catalogue: The Uninhabitable Earth.
Perhaps – if honour is important to your bourgeois cultural values – an honest rephrasing would state “All cultures are not equal. Or at least they are not equal in preparing kkki$$er cattle pretending to be citizens; to be productive resource rapists in an ecologically illiterate suicidal advanced fuck the planet for our fragile ego’s economy.”
To the extent that any individual would not want to participate in the suicidal destruction of the planet; and wish to declare their preference for an alternative economic way of living in harmony with all the other species on our planet, if ‘sustainable survival’ is superior existential perspective; then that would be a ‘survival superior/healthy’ mental attitude.
Too Hot to Handle: Superior Primitive Sustainable Culture:
My name is Jonathan Zimmerman. I am a Professor of History and Education at New York University. The last book I published was a history of sex education around the world. This book was like all acts of history, in some ways a personal book because my mother actually was a family planning and sex education expert. One of the thing she taught me as I was growing up was that the United States was behind other countries, especially those in Europe, on the subject of sex education. Europeans were more direct, more explicit, and more honest about the subject. What I discovered during the course of this book, is that actually, the United States was the pioneer of sex education around the world, rather than being the lagard. It started in part because the United States was a part of mass higher education. But then the other thing that was more interesting that I discovered was that instead of Europe being ahead and us being behind and vice-versa; that actually sex-ed when it took root in Europe, had a very different set of goals. The idea of ahead and behind in any race, implies a shared goal, a shared finish line. And what I discovered is that actually the goals were quite different. In the United States sex education began and I would say still exists in order to prevent certain negative outcomes, namely teen pregnancy and STD’s. It began during veneral disease outbreaks in this country a hundred years ago, and the goal was to try to promote sexual continence so that the collective in the nation, sometimes the race, would remain healthy. In Europe the goals were quite different, especially in Sweden, which was the first country to require sex education. There the goal was much more individudated. The idea was not necessarily to ward of negative collective consequences, it was to help each individual to determine the direction and quality of their sexual life, including sexual pleasure. And that is a very different goal. In some ways I discovered this comparison, this contrast runs contrast to many other stories we tell about the United States and Europe. Where in the United States it is all about the individual and the individuals’ path and rights, and Europe is about the collectivity, in fact with sex education it was precisely the opposite. Sex ed here was about the collectivity and specifically protecting the health of the collectivity; and in Europe particularly Scandinavia, much more oriented towards the individual.” – Jonathan Zimmerman; Brainwaves Video Anthology: Too Hot to Handle: A Global History of Sex Education.
To the extent that any one or more racial, religious culture’s – cultural rights story – restricts its tribal procreation and/or consumption to below ecological carrying capacity limits; within its designated tribal territory; that tribe can sustain their lifestyle for millions of years; as long as all neighbouring tribes also restrict their procreation and consumption to below ecological carrying capacity limits. Effectively those tribes are consciously or unconsciously submitting themselves to procreation/consumption lifestyle’s in accordance to ‘rule by nature’s carrying capacity law’.
Imagine a life in which you would need to work only 12 to 17 hours per week. Your society would be egalitarian, with respect to both gender and social class, and all resources would be shared and not hoarded. With all of your free time, you could devote yourself to leisure, to spending time with family and to creating a strong community. Is this a communist utopia, the subject of the latest financial self-help book or a sustainable reality? In “Affluence Without Abundance: The Disappearing World of the Bushmen,” anthropologist James Suzman asks readers to consider what such a world might be like. And for an answer he presents the example of the Ju/’hoansi of southern Africa, a hunter-gatherer group whose numbers have dwindled radically but that still exists as a living reminder of a lifestyle that all humans embraced until the dawn of agriculture, roughly 12,000 years ago.
While the past 400 years of colonialism and globalization have almost destroyed the hunter-gatherer lifestyle, about 8,000 to 10,000 Ju/’hoansi are left, mostly in Namibia and Botswana. The Ju/’hoansi speak in a language of vocalizations and clicks, as represented by symbols such as “/,” and they make up 10 percent of southern Africa’s hunter-gatherer population; they are broadly (and somewhat condescendingly) referred to as Bushmen. Dubbed “the original affluent society” by anthropologist Marshall Sahlins, hunter-gatherers have long captured the imagination of scholars interested in understanding how our ancestors probably sustained themselves for hundreds of thousands of years. Living in small groups of 15 to 20 individuals, hunter-gatherers survived by taking only what they needed from the environment. Although certain times of year were leaner than others, by working about 17 hours per week, the Bushmen managed to maintain a 2,300-calorie diet, with an extensive knowledge of how to forage for some 100 types of “fruits, stems, gums, seeds, flowers, stalks, roots, tubers, and bulbs.” Suzman describes how the Ju/’hoansi could hunt large game despite using small arrows, poisoning the arrows with larvae from a beetle found beneath African myrrh trees, evidence of what he calls the “artistry in their apparently archaic technologies.”
– Washington Post: Bushmen who have little have much to teach us about living well.
If sustainability of a culture is the cultural value being measured for superior / inferiority; then clearly Bushman’s culture is thousands of times more superior at living sustainably; than European industrial civilization.
Superior Resource Rapists Planetary Suicide culture:
To the extent that one culture – cultural rights story – consciously or unconsciously allows for procreation and/or consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; within its designated tribal territory; that tribe is on a S.Y. Titanic collision path with Mother Nature’s carrying capacity iceberg reality; unless it develops its warrior skills to conquer all other tribes for their resources; and subsequent thereto uses their imperial hegemonic power to implement EoP Intnl law on all the planets tribes, and collectively reduces all tribes footprint back to carrying capacity limits.
Such a process could have begun after WWI or WWII’s implementation of the League of Nation or United Nations; where the primary goal of the League/UN could have been the negotiation and implementation of EoP Intnl law; instead of providing a welfare bureaucracy for thousands of poverty pimping academics.
Imagine: EoP TRC Peace Treaty at 1919 Versailles, 1945 Nuremberg, Cold War:
Imagine if an EoP TRC Peace Treaty process had been implemented at Versailles, Nuremberg, or Fall of the Berlin Wall:
I imagine if the Versailles Treaty had been negotiated through an Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation process, resulting in the implementation of an EoP international law social contract, Hitler would probably have been a happy little yeoman farmer in Austria or Germany, with Blondi and Eva, and nobody would have ever heard of him. Similarly Osama Bin Laden, Ramzi Yousef, Anders Breivik, Che Guevara, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, Polpot, Charles Taylor, Fidel Castro, etc, etc, would probably have been happy little yeoman organic farmers in their villages in the Middle East, Asia or Latin America, etc. There would currently be less than a billion people on planet earth, all of them – of all races, genders and religions, entitled to their responsible freedom property ration of 7.2 gha at a population of 1 billion, or 72 gha at population of 100 million as per eco-footprint carrying capacity EoP Intnl law – living in responsible freedom villages and nations, as Aryans lived for thousands of years on the Steppe, Bushmen lived in the Kalahari, Chuckchi’s lived in Chukotka, etc.
– EoP Leg Sub: 26 Jul: EoP v US DoJSC: EoP WinWin v WiP BangBang, William Colby, Vietnam War, John F Kennedy & Oliver Stone; 25 Jul: Re: EoP Response to Rope Culture: James Mason is Back; via West’s Darkest Hour.
If however, the hegemonic imperial power coalition – example NATO / Warsaw Pact/ SCO / ASEAN – uses its acquired territorial and human resources simply to increase its citizens consumption greed and ego illiterate arrogance; it, or they, shall go the same way as prior empire’s in their collision with Mother Nature’s carrying capacity iceberg reality.
Humans who engage in totalitarian agriculture, engage in Predator-Prey Growth and Collapse of Civilization/Empire cycles: Greco-Rome, Minoan, Mycenaean, Sumerians, Akkadian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Achaemenid, Seleucid, Zhou, Han, Tang, Song, Parthian, Sassanid, Umayyad, Abbasid, Mauryan, Gupta, Maya, Hittite, Harrapan and Teotihuacan. Collapses result from (1) Ecological Strain and (2) Economic Stratification and include the disappearance of between 90-99% of the populations (from famine, disease and organized violence resource wars) including their kings, Gods, calendars and other complex political and cultural institutions.
Economic Stratification Collapse occurs due to unequal consumption of resources generating Elites vs Commoners. As Elites become sizable and keep growing, they consume more; their over-exploitation results in collapse of resources to the Commoners; who experience famine and collapse. Elites — due to their wealth — do not suffer the detrimental effects of environmental collapse until much later than Commoners, which allows them to continue ‘business as usual’, despite the impending catastrophe; explaining how historical collapses were allowed to occur by seemingly oblivious elites (eg Roman & Mayan cases).
– Military Gospel: 2012&14 Nasa-Funded Studies: Human (Predator) and Nature (Prey) Dynamics (HANDY) studies.
Conclusion: WiP cultures; there are superior/inferior differences:
Some WiP culture’s Titanics are on 2 mph speed towards their iceberg, other WiP cultures are on 30 mph or 300 mph speed towards Mother Nature’s iceberg.
Superior cultural Intelligence
Capable of intellectual honesty about intelligence?:
What is your definition for intelligence and intellectually honest?
Ecology of Peace definition for intellectually honest is ego and ecological literacy.
As for intelligence: Any enquiry into a clear and succinct definition of ‘intelligence’ would require individuals who are buck stops here intellectually honest, to arrive at an accurate definition of ‘intelligence’.
What most people refer to as ‘intelligence’ appears to be a result of them following their Masonic War is Peace cultural scripting; not a result of their honest existential enquiry into what they as individuals want, from the experience of being alive, on this planet, at this time.
If an individual is incapable of intellectual honesty, to buck stops here honestly evaluate any of his hypothesis as to what could be an accurate definition of ‘intelligence’; then such individuals belief in his or her superior intelligence, or even in the concept of ‘superior intelligence’ in one or another skill or endeavour, are equivalent to children’s beliefs in fairy tales.
A child who believes a fairy tale that it is intelligent to walk off a cliff and a simple prayer to Jesus, will keep their body from crashing down the cliff, is in for a rude awakening.
Put differently: Ecology of Peace off the cuff working hypothesis definition of ‘intelligence’ would be:
What do you want from life? If you don’t know what you want: it would be intelligent for you to find someone who can help you decide for you what you want from life? If you do know what you want: Find others who are willing to be honest with you, to help you to be honest with yourself, to get what you want. Be honest with yourself and others about what you want. Some people may not be willing to help you get one thing you want, but may be willing to help you get something else you may want or need. Deceiving people to get what you want, means they will be less willing to help you to get what you want next time you ask. Put differently: If you are so ashamed of what you want, that you are not willing to ask for help to get what you want honestly and sincerely; what does that say about your intelligence about honest communication and relationships? If you want others to cooperate with you to get what you want, be honest with them. If you have been honest with others about what you want, and you cannot find others who want what you want, or are willing to help you to get what you want. Confront that reality. The more fair-minded, sincere and honest people, you sincerely and honestly and fairly help to get what they want, the more they may be willing to help you get what you want. The more you deceive, lie and manipulate others to get what you want, the more you will need to rely on bribery and deception to get what you want, and the more enemies you will make with your fuck honour tactics, to get what you want. If you think what someone wants is unreasonable and/or unfair. Be honest with them about why you don’t want to help them, so they can evaluate whether what they want is reasonable and justified and fair. At the end of your life, you may not have gotten all you wanted, but you can know you were honest about what you wanted, help others when you could and lived a sincere and honourable inner peace life, which is not something 99.99% of the lonely, petrified, paranoid, backstabbing, self hating oligarchs could say for themselves, for the past ten thousand years.
» EoP v WiP 25 Jan: EoP Response to: Angry White Dude: Angry White Dude’s Irrepressible Conflict.
Step 1: Overdosing on Gender, Racial or Religious WiP Suck My Fragile Ego Penis/Vagina Supremacist Bullshit.
Until the individual is honest with themselves as to what they want from life; they will be unconsciously manipulated by their racial, religious or ideological cultural script’s ideas of what they should want.
Put differently – presumably ego/eco illiterate; but perhaps consciously and deliberately dishonest – elite of most racial, religious or class ideological groups receive socio-economic and status benefits from creating certain racial or religious masculine ‘macho’ or femininity ‘beautiful’ or ‘moral supremacist’ objects of devotion goals, that are embedded in their their racial, gender, or religious group shared system of thought and action cultural ideology:
[..] Individuals who are not honest with themselves about what they want, will – like drug addicts; but in this case fragile ego ‘please confirm my racial, gender, religious perspective of reality’ ideocultural reality addicts — surround themselves with other individuals to peer pressure brainwash them to stay on their gender, ideological, racial or religious ‘object of devotion’ script’s ecologically illiterate goals.
According to Tony Robbins, one of the ways in which he helped individuals to get over their addictions was for them to almost overdose on the addiction – for example: eat so much chocolate until you puke yourself sick – to create a biochemistry revulsion for it, and thereby alter their biochemistry away from that particular addiction.
[..] MatrixCattle Humans all have secret interpretations about their particular racial, religious or ideological object of devotion script goals; which if they sat down and publicly shared they would realize are not only contradictory, but unattainable.
Matrix Cattle humans are on an energy slave treadmill chasing ‘macho’ or ‘beautiful’ or moral supremacist’ or ‘succesful’ fantasies, and their treadmill running is of socio-economic profit to their gender, racial or religious elite who hold up those unattainable ‘macho’ ‘beautiful’ ‘moral supremacist’ ideo-cultural objects of devotion.
[..] Step 2: Self Honesty Decision.
Once they have overdosed – some may require a few different racial or religious ideocultural addictions before — they are ready for their personal Walter Thoreau Walden Pond Simplicity Revolution.
My Life goals are simple: With access to land, using my own labour and the labour of some fellow Walter Throreau Walden Pond Simplicity Revolution friends and colleagues, my simple friends and I are capable of being happy while satisfying our Maslow Hiearchy of Needs.
Simple Cooperative Leader: partnership, cooperation, and empowerment:
My Life goals are simple: With access to land, using my own labour and the labour of some fellow Walter Throreau Walden Pond Simplicity Revolution friends and colleagues, my simple friends and I are capable of being happy while satisfying our Maslow Hiearchy of Needs.
WiP Resource Supremacist: Dominance, control, and suppression:
This individual – irrespective of whether their self identity ideology is left or right, racially or religiously overt or covert – life goals – presumably as a result of their conscious or unconscious resource benefits they receive from their ideological ‘self importance’ or ‘status’ addiction to their racial, religious or gender script – are to be divide and conquer resource supremacists.
[..] Step 3: Self Honest Simple Cooperative Leader:
Once the individual has honestly confronted themselves and decided they are:
Simple Individual and/or Simple Cooperative Leader: My Life goals are simple: With access to land, using my own labour and the labour of some fellow Walter Throreau Walden Pond Simplicity Revolution friends and colleagues, my simple friends and I are capable of being happy while satisfying our Maslow Hiearchy of Needs.
They proceed to nurture their self honesty and self sufficient responsible freedom future for all goals; by (i) relating to friends, family and/or colleagues who practice ego literate [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] aka responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] communication feedback to one another; and (ii) finding individuals and/or groups who are cooperating to co-create an economic system [eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za] that provides a property ration to responsible freedom individuals which, with their labour, can enable their self-sufficient honourable survival.
They are confronted with the Simple Life Goals leaders next question:
What is the simplest way in which a legal system can be implemented internationally that will allow for all responsible freedom individuals of all races, religions or genders, to live simply, self sufficiently and happy?
Much of the history of indigenous movements, Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Polpot’s communism and General Koos de La Rey, Thomas Sankara and Mahatma Gandhi’s third world anti-imperialism, Steve Biko’s Black Consciousness, Mother Earth Birth Control Feminism, Zionism Kibbutzism, etc involves different groups of individuals stumbling with their experimentation of answering their conception of this question. What is the simplest way in which a national legal system can be implemented that will allow for individuals who have responsible freedom simple life goals to live simply in dignity?
Stumbling with regards to their own ego/eco illiteracy [EoP definition of ego/eco literacy: ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] and/or their followers ego/eco illiteracy; and/or their capitalist enemy leaders ego/eco illiteracy and/or their capitalist enemy leaders followers ego/eco illiteracy.
» EoP v WiP Neg: 20 Aug: EoP Re: The Damage we do to boys and men explains the Trump presidency.
Individuals willing to (i) hold themselves accountable to practicing eco/ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] values, (ii) support EoP supporting political leaders with a mandate to begin negotiations to implement EoP intnl law; are welcome to sign their responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oaths.
Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk
Notices via Twitter
EoP MILED Clerk: 20 Sep 2017: 12:08 hrs: @nyusteinhardt @monachareneppc @IGD_News @ThatEliMosley @ACPD_VA EoP corr 4 u at http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2017/09/20-sep-jon-zimmerman/