21 Nov: Guy McPherson: Climate Change Options: EoP Global One Child intl Law or Whom Should Military Kill Genghis Khan Green Reforestation?

* Guy McPherson … CounterCurrents
» Guy McPherson, Alliance for World Scientists, William Ripple, Christopher Wolf, Thomas Newsome, Mauro Galetti, Mohammed Alamgir, Eileen Crist, William Laurance, Julia Pongratz, Martin Claussen, Victor Brovkin, Greg Anser, Chris Field, Mary Whelan, Joe Berry, Sergei Gaschak, James Beasley, Maryna Shkvyria, Lawrence Wilkerson, Paul Jay, The Real News, Dimitri Laskaris, Sharmini Peries, Jason G Brent, CounterCurrents
* 21 Nov: Climate Change Options: EoP Global One Child intl Law or Whom Should Military Kill Genghis Khan Green Reforestation?
* Alliance of World Scientists: World Scientists Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice [MG Copy]; Union of Concerned Scientists: 1992 World Scientists Warning to Humanity. William Laurance: Tropical Forest destruction in Brazil. Sage: Coupled climate–carbon simulations indicate minor global effects of wars and epidemics on atmospheric CO2 between AD 800 and 1850; DailyMail: Genghis Khan the GREEN: Invader killed so many people that carbon levels plummeted; Carnegie: War, Plague No Match for Deforestation in Driving CO2 Buildup.  National Geographic: 30 Years After Chernobyl: Nature is Thriving. Amazon: Humans: An Endangered Species: The Only [One Child] Option; CounterCurrents: Coercive Population Control; Billions of People will Die Horribly.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v Guy McPhersonEoP Ft Bragg: Military Ethics Q, EoP v Alliance 4 World ScientistsEoP v Jason Brent / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:41 PM
Subject: Edit: Climate Change Options: EoP Global One Child intl Law or Whom Should Military Kill Genghis Khan Green Reforestation?
To: Guy McPherson <guy.r.mcpherson@gmail.com>
Cc: William Ripple <bill.ripple@oregonstate.edu>, Christopher Wolf <wolfch@msu.edu>, Thomas Newsome <t.newsome@deakin.edu.au>, Mauro Galetti <mgaletti@rc.unesp.br>, Mohammed Alamgir <mohammed.alamgir@jcu.edu.au>, Eileen Crist <ecrist@vt.edu>, William Laurance <bill.laurance@jcu.edu.au>, Julia Pongratz <julia.pongratz@mpimet.mpg.de>, Martin Cluassen <martin.claussen@mpimet.mpg.de>, Victor Brovkin <victor.brovkin@mpimet.mpg.de>, Greg Anser <gpa@carnegiescience.edu>, Chris Field <cfield@ciw.edu>, Mary Whelan <mwhelan@carnegiescience.edu>, Joe Berry <jberry@carnegiescience.edu>, Sergei Gaschak <gashak@ic-chernobyl.kiev.ua>, James Beasley <beasley@srel.uga.edu>, Maryna Shkvyria <shkvyrya@gmail.com>, Lawrence Wilkerson <lbwilk@wm.edu>, The Real News <contact@therealnews.com>, Sharmini Peries <sharmini@therealnews.com>, Jason G Brent <jbrent6179@aol.com>, CounterCurrents <editor@countercurrents.org>

Guy McPherson
CC: Alliance for World Scientists: Ripple et al
CC: Julia Pongratz: Max Planck & Carnegie: Genghis Khan the Green & Climate Change
CC: Chernobyl Radiation Exclusion Zone Effects on Reforestation
CC: Real News, Paul Jay & Lawrence Wilkerson.
CC: Judge Jason Brent; Countercurrents.

EoP v Guy McPherson:
Guy McPherson (guy.r.mcpherson@gmail.com)
Ref: EoP v G McPherson [eop-v-grm.tygae.org.za].

Alliance for World Scientists: Ripple et al:
William Ripple (bill.ripple@oregonstate.edu); Christopher Wolf (wolfch@msu.edu); Thomas Newsome (t.newsome@deakin.edu.au); Mauro Galetti (mgaletti@rc.unesp.br), Mohammed Alamgir (mohammed.alamgir@jcu.edu.au);  Eileen Crist (ecrist@vt.edu); William Laurance (bill.laurance@jcu.edu.au)
Ref: Alliance of World Scientists: World Scientists Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice [MG Copy]; Union of Concerned Scientists: 1992 World Scientists Warning to Humanity. William Laurance: Tropical Forest destruction in Brazil.

J Pongratz: Max Planck & Carnegie: Genghis Khan the Green & Climate Change:
Julia Pongratz (julia.pongratz@mpimet.mpg.de); Martin Cluassen (martin.claussen@mpimet.mpg.de); Victor Brovkin (victor.brovkin@mpimet.mpg.de); Greg Anser (gpa@carnegiescience.edu); Chris Field (cfield@ciw.edu); Mary Whelan (mwhelan@carnegiescience.edu); Joe Berry (jberry@carnegiescience.edu)
Ref: Sage: Coupled climate–carbon simulations indicate minor global effects of wars and epidemics on atmospheric CO2 between AD 800 and 1850; DailyMail: Genghis Khan the GREEN: Invader killed so many people that carbon levels plummeted; Carnegie: War, Plague No Match for Deforestation in Driving CO2 Buildup.

Chernobyl Radiation Exclusion Zone Effects on Reforestation:
Sergei Gaschak (gashak@ic-chernobyl.kiev.ua); James Beasley (beasley@srel.uga.edu); Maryna Shkvyria (shkvyrya@gmail.com)
Ref: National Geographic: 30 Years After Chernobyl: Nature is Thriving

Real News: Paul Jay & Lawrence Wilkerson:
Lawrence Wilkerson (lbwilk@wm.edu); Paul Jay via The Real News (contact@therealnews.com); Dimitri Laskaris via Sharmini Peries (sharmini@therealnews.com)
Ref: The Real News: Reality Asserts Itself with Paul Jay: Lawrence Wilkerson: Who Makes Foreign Policy? 01:02; If We Remain Predators; the Planet Will Cast us off: 03.

Judge Jason Brent, CounterCurrents:
Jason G Brent (jbrent6179@aol.com); CounterCurrents (editor@countercurrents.org)
Ref: Amazon: Humans: An Endangered Species: The Only [One Child] Option; CounterCurrents: Coercive Population Control; Billions of People will Die Horribly.

Guy McPherson:

Climate Change Options: EoP Global One Child intl Law or Whom Should Military Kill Genghis Khan Green Reforestation?

I watched your video at Guy McPherson: The Whole Story in 23 Minutes.

Re: Paradoxes/Predicaments:
* Civilization is a heat engine, irrespective of fossil fuels/alternative fuels; it puts out this heat, sort of like a blanket.
* Shutting off civilization heats the planet even faster, because civilization also provides cooling, in terms of the aerosol sulphates from burning coal; that acts as an umbrella. Within a number of weeks after industrial civilization fails, the planet heats up drastically and catastrophically, way faster than any being on the planet can keep up.

As near-term human extinction is debated back and forth, argued for and against (with a degree of condemnation), the signs are already painfully obvious that this is the path we are heading down. Climate change, environmental damage and nuclear meltdowns are the signposts towards the demise of the human race and, as 2014 fades away, the issue of near-term human extinction demands serious attention. – Emma Fenton.
– Guy McPherson: The Truth About Near-Term Human Extinction.

In this day and age, we need a message of hope, but not a delusional one. Finding those to guide us and inspire us and work alongside equally is something which is very much within our power, and our obligation as conscientious human beings to fulfill. It is through these vital connections that perhaps we can give our next generation something to hold on to. – Emma Fenton.
– Guy McPherson: Where Are They? The Creatives of our Generation.

You repeatedly fail to make any – let alone scientific intellectual honest enquiry – into the role of the Genghis Khan the Green massive depopulation/reforestation effect option – as suggested to Cop21 [eop-cop21.tygae.org.za] and CPAC 17 [eop-cpac17.tygae.org.za]– that could take – maybe massively surpass – the role currently taken by aerosol sulphates in cooling the planet; thereby removing one of the justifications for your alleged paradox.

Genghis Khan The Green EoP Reforestation Effect:

If EoP Cop21/CPAC17 Root Cause Problem Solving Implemented for humane deindustrialization and depopulation; it would have greater positive effects on re-forestation, biodiversity and climate change than the extremely violent depopulation implemented by Genghis Khan the Green.

Genghis Khan has been branded the greenest invader in history – after his murderous conquests killed so many people that huge swathes of cultivated land returned to forest. The Mongol leader, who established a vast empire between the 13th and 14th centuries, helped remove nearly 700 million tons of carbon from the atmosphere, claims a new study. The deaths of 40 million people meant that large areas of cultivated land grew thick once again with trees, which absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. And, although his methods may be difficult for environmentalists to accept, ecologists believe it may be the first ever case of successful manmade global cooling.

Genghis Khan and his Mongol hordes had an impact on the global carbon cycle as big as today’s annual demand for gasoline. The Black Death, on the other hand, came and went too quickly for it to cause much of a blip in the global carbon budget. Dwarfing both of these events, however, has been the historical trend towards increasing deforestation, which over centuries has released vast amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, as crop and pasture lands expanded to feed growing human populations. Even Genghis Kahn couldn’t stop it for long.

“.. humans started to influence the environment thousands of years ago by changing the vegetation cover of the Earth‘s landscapes when we cleared forests for agriculture.”

— Coupled climate–carbon simulations indicate minor global effects of wars and epidemics on atmospheric CO2 between AD 800 and 18501 study by Julia Pongratz; article: Genghis Khan the GREEN: Invader killed so many people that carbon levels plummeted; Carnegie: War, Plague No Match for Deforestation in Driving CO2 Buildup.
– SQSwans: Genghis Khan the GREEN: Invader killed so many people that carbon levels plummeted.

**

We need some sort of relationship like that between Washington and Beijing today, I think. And I do not mean in any way that we should rule the world together. What I mean is the [ecological & economic collapse consequences of WiP ‘right to breed/consume above ecological carrying capacity limits’ intnl law] challenges like we’re going to confront in the 21st century, challenges that could be [species ending] existential, challenges like climate change, challenges like enough water to drink, enough food to eat, and so forth — I’ve seen some projections that say — by climatologists whose views I respect, that say by the end of this century we could have only arable land and water enough for some half-billion people. What do we do with the other 9 billion? Where do we bury them? How do we deal with that kind of massive change in human relationships with this planet? So these are huge challenges. So what I’m saying is you need this kind of great-power relationship, this great-state relationship to begin to lead the [EoP truth and reconciliation responsible freedom] way for others to follow. — [EoP Amended] Lawrence Wilkerson: Real News: Reality Asserts Itself: Who Makes US Foreign Policy .. If we Remain Predators, the Planet will cast us off.
– The Real News: Reality Asserts Itself with Paul Jay: Lawrence Wilkerson: Who Makes Foreign Policy? 01:02; If We Remain Predators; the Planet Will Cast us off: 03.
» SQSwans: Reports: Wilkerson: Who Makes US Foreign Policy .. if we Remain Predators, Planet will Cast us Off
» IG: 17-08-08_derrickjensen-lwilkersonpjay; 17-09-08_vic-devilsbridge.

Rapid depopulation can be accomplished reasonably non-violently, orderly and humanely:

* Implement EoP intl law: making China’s one child law global, and also requiring consumption reduction to below carrying capacity limits.

Implement [EoP – breed & consume below ecological carrying capacity limits – Intnl Law] Family Planning for [orderly & humane de-population & de-industrialization race, religious & cultural planetary] Revolution!

Deng Xiaoping introduced China’s one child policy in 1978-79, to halt – an average of 6 children per family – population growth. On 25 Sep 1980 an official public letter called on all citizens to adhere to the one child policy. The One Child policy was enacted and managed by the National Population and Family Planning Commission, through incentives, persuasion and coercion. Unofficial figures claim approximately 300-400 million births were prevented between 1978-2015. A 2008 survey reported that 76% of the Chinese public support the law. Less than 10% of Chinese families have taken advantage of the Chinese governments relaxation of the law to a two child policy; citing environmental and economic reasons for their adherence to the one child policy rule.
– IG: 17-08-30_garrettmurtaugh-cnfamplanning.

Judge Jason Brent: One Child: Who Can & Cannot Reproduce Proposal:

The action I am initially proposing is value neutral and does not favor or harm any individual or group. The action I am proposing will be applied to every person or group without favoring anyone. The action is very simple—limit the right of any male to father only one live child and limit the right of every woman to one live birth. In simple terms a couple is limited to one and only one child—not one child for the male and one child for the female.

These limitations would be applied to every single human being without regard to race, religion, national origin or anything else and it would be absolute, no exceptions. It would be applied without regard for wealth, or the lack of wealth, and it would be applied without regard for the country of birth or residence of either the male or female. It would be applied without regard to intelligence, or the lack thereof, and without regard of the ability of the male or female to function in society. (At a later date when a method was agreed upon relating to dividing human beings into two groups, the ability to function in society would be considered in relation to who could or could not reproduce.) The right to either father a child or for a female to give birth could not be sold or transferred; it would be personal to the individual. If a live child were born with a birth defect or with some other disability it would not permit either the father or mother to produce another child. Each couple would have the right to have all appropriate pre-natal tests to determine if the child in the womb would be born with a birth or genetic defect and if the chance existed that the child would be born with such a defect to have an abortion.

Since survival of our species depends on the one child rule, under my proposal any attempt to evade the rule would result in death of the evader and of any second child. The rule to be fair must be absolute, without a single exception. If the female cannot or refuses to provide the name of the father she and the child shall be immediately executed. All of the ideas set forth in this paragraph may be considered horrible and inhumane. However, since they will be applied equally, no individual or group is harmed except to the extent that an individual cannot either father or give birth to a second child. The harm caused to the individual and the harm caused to all of humanity by enforcing the one child rule set forth above is miniscule compared to the harm which all of humanity would suffer if population were not reduced.

Since the birth of a child is very hard to hide, there must be communal responsibility and accountability for any attempt to do so. Those who knowingly failed to report the birth of a second or any higher number of children would themselves be subject to the very same severe punishment that would be meted out to the parents of the second or higher numbered child—no religious, cultural or ethnic exemptions would obtain. Humanity cannot consider the evasion of the single child rule a game to be played with a minor penalty, if caught. No group or individual could be permitted any evasion of the one child rule a that would lead to a disparity among groups and among individuals causing irreparable harm to the entire system established to reduce population. Should this sanction seem barbaric or draconian, it is surely less draconian in its effects than the merciless verdict of nature upon a species that refuses to contain its expansion.

In order for this proposal to be fair, equitable and workable, society and governments would be required to take action today to provide the means for every human being to control his or her fertility, to give everyone on the face of the earth the ability to limit birth to a single child. Governments would be required to devote a whatever portion of their Gross Domestic Product is necessary to the provision of artificial birth control devices of any and all types including sterilization, at low or no cost as appropriate, to their citizens, no matter the age of the citizens once a citizen reaches the age he/she can physically reproduce. This would also include instruction as how to use the devices. This would also include education of both males and females that the birth of a second child would result in the execution of the father and mother as well as the child. Governments would be required to provide safe, as much as any medical procedure can be safe, and low cost or free access to abortion. If any person, either male or female, had more than two failures of birth control devices, it would be conclusively presumed that the person was unable to use birth control devices and the person would be physically and permanently sterilized.

If poor nations were unable to devote the necessary funds to accomplish the one child rule in five years, the rich nations of the world would be required to assist the poor nations, after an evaluation that the poor nations were doing the best they could under some reasonable standard. Since survival of our species depends on reducing population below the current 6.7 billion humans now alive, the necessary funds to establish the system to control population must be made available. It should be emphasized that a “One-Child-Per-Family” (OCPF) law that is almost completely effective will not suffice. It must be totally and universally effective. After a five year preparation period, the rule must be enforced. The reduction in population would continue under the one child rule until all of humanity agreed upon the method and criteria necessary to implement the two group solution described herein. Population would continue to be reduced pursuant to the method and criteria of the two group solution until it reached 300 million or some other lower number agreed upon by humanity. The number finally agreed upon would be based on the ability of the earth to provide resources for humanity to maintain an acceptable standard of living for a minimum of 25,000 years. And 25,000 years is infinitely small when compared to the 160 million years the dinosaurs ruled the earth.

No doubt any proposal that would recommend capital punishment for transgressors of the One-Child-Per-Family law presently evokes immediate revulsion and rejection. Outside the context of an imminent die-off, given our heritage of moral, religious and cultural programming, I would be surprised if it didn’t. An example which shows that morality changes when circumstances change follows. Any Londoner who proposed in August 1938 that the Royal Air Force should one day bomb German cites with women and children in them would be summarily dismissed as a callous barbarian. But just two years later Londoners were clamoring for that action. Reality has a way of effecting abrupt ethical changes. What is not presently comprehended by almost all of humanity is that we are now in an emergency. Our species is on the brink of an unparalleled catastrophe—our destruction and the destruction of our civilization. It is a matter of complete indifference to me that many, if not all, readers will find the execution of anyone having a second child to be horrible and against every moral precept they learned or understood was applicable to humanity. The problem is not that my prescriptions are immoral or horrible. Rather the problem is that the situation humanity finds itself in is horrible. I will now remind the readers that under the law I propose every individual would be well aware of the consequences of flouting the law. Which of the two evils is worse— a) executing anyone who knowingly violates the one child rule; or b) not reducing population such that the vast majority or probably all of humanity is destroyed? Under this system fertility drugs would not be permitted or if they were permitted and used, only one child would be permitted to be born alive or the rest would be destroyed at birth, if more than one were born alive. If a women gave birth to more than one child and fertility drugs or any other actions to increase fertility or the number of children born were not the cause, those children would be permitted to live. Each individual will have a very clear choice—execution or birth control or sterilization or abortion or abstinence.
– SQSwans: Humans: An Endangered Species V: A Proposal: How to Determine Who Can and Who Cannot Reproduce; by Judge Jason Brent.

Rapid depopulation can also be accomplished orderly and violently:

* Military Options to enable quick consumption/population reduction of big carbon footprint nations such as USA; and/or enable quick reforestation of habitats that would enable quick reforestation: egsample: Brazil/Tropical Forests [William Laurance: Tropical Forest destruction in Brazil] & India: * HAARP dieoff: * EMP nuke: Hedgehog: Imminent EMP Event on US & Societal Collapse; and possibly a whole host of other classified mass killing military options, we don’t even know about.

In Covert Operations of the NSA John St Clair Akwei; a former NSA employee describes how the NSA can psychotronically manipulate the thoughts and bodily functions of any individual on the planet. Put differently; the NSA or any other nations intelligence agencies; such as Britain’s MI6, or Russia’s FSB/KGB; or Israel’s Mossad; can remotely manipulate the thoughts of any one or more persons; and the internal organs in their body; such as induce a heart attack or stroke, pull a tendon or muscle; fill the lungs with water to induce pneumonia [..]; and aggravate an already inflamed intestine to activate an gastrointestinal bleeding attack, put a village to sleep; influence the behaviour or dieoff of animals; etc.

In Angels Don’t Play this HAARP, Dr. Nick Begich and Jeanne Manning provide a detailed overview of HAARP technology and its capabilities to: disrupt human mental processes; jam all global communications systems; change weather patterns over large areas; interfere with wildlife migration patterns; negatively affect one or more individuals health; unnaturally impact the Earth‘s upper atmosphere. A Begich HAARP interview is a matter of court record in: HC-CPD A696-04: State v Lara Johnstone | Vladimir Zhirinovsky: Scalar Weaponry.
EoP Axis Military Necessity Evacuation: Overview.

And of course – in the absence of the former legal and/or military orderly options – upon the collapse of the state and the accompanied 509 Chernobyl nuclear industrial accidents; rapid depopulation Armageddon Four Horses will accomplish their versions of depopulation.

Thirty years after the accident, these woodlands increased up to one half or more times, so now approximately 70 percent of the area is forest. – Sergei Gaschak
– National Geographic: 30 Years After Chernobyl: Nature is Thriving

Put simply: If you don’t want non-violent, orderly EoP Scientific and Cultural [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] Intl rapid depopulation; the Military DeIndustrialization / Depopulation Reforestation Legal Ethics Question is: Whom should the Military Kill?; to enable military option rapid depopulation and reforestation?

Either the current birth [& consumption] rates must come down [to below ecological carrying capacity limits, via the implementation of an EoP intl law social contract; enabling humane and orderly de-industrialization and depopulation return to living in harmony with to Carrying Capacity limits law] more quickly; or the current death rates must go up [in a WiP Financial or Military DieOff Clusterfuck]. There is no other way. – [EoP Amended] Robert McNamara
– EoP Leg Sub: EoP v WiP Military.

A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za].

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk

.