10 Dec: EoP re: Channel 4: Things We Won’t Say about Race that Are True; What British Muslims Really Think.

* Trevor Phillips … Ismet Rawat
» Trevor Phillips, Equality and Human Rights Commission, Wales, Scotland, Media, Tarique Ghaffur, Shahrokh Mireskandari, Dean & Dean, Ali Dizaei, National Black Police Association, Solicitors Regulation Authority, Simon Woolley, Operation Black Vote, Rothschilds Family, Rothschild & Co, Jack Straw, Kate Hollern MP, Eric Kaufmann, Les Ferdinand, Sharron Elkabas, Allison Ferreira, MN2S, Old Boys Network, John Terry, Ann Cryer, Univ of Bradford, The Times, Andrew Norfolk, Nottingham Univ, Matthew Goodwin, Nigel Farage, Annabelle Fuller, UKIP, Tony Blair, Institute for Global Change, Media, Martin Boon, ICM, Litmus, Nadia Hussain, AK Artist Management, Aatif Nawaz, Anjum Anwar, Christian Muslim Forum, Ummah TV, Salaam UK Muslims in Britain, Canon Chris Chivers, United Society, Hamza Tzortzis, Nusrat Lodda, Amra Bone, Multifaith Chaplaincy, Ed Davis, Rizwan Ahmed, Kalsoom Bashir, Elham Manea, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, Rod Liddle, Spectator Editor, Fiyaz Mughal, : Faith Matters, David Cameron, Alzheimers Research UK,  Miles Hewston, Britain First, Jayda Fransen, Alternative Right, James Lawrence, Anjem Choudary, UK: Society of Muslim  Lawyers, Ismet Rawat.
* 10 Dec: EoP re: Channel 4: Things We Won’t Say about Race that Are True; What British Muslims Really Think.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v Alt Right, EoP v Jayda Fransen, EoP v James Lawrence, UK v Anjem ChoudaryEoP v Trevor PhillipsEoP v UK ParliamentEoP v EU ParliamentEoP v Tony Blair / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity,  EoP v WiP Religion / EoP v WiP Neg.

Message blocked – presumably by MILINT Hackers – to all recipients. The response was: Message rejected. See https://support.google.com/mail/answer/69585 for more information.

EoPMILED Clerk interpretation for blocking – subject to EoP RH IQO – documented at 24 Nov: IBANet Julian Assange Conversation: EoP Re: EROEI Root Cause of Legal System Collapse.

.

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 11:49 PM
Subject: EoP re: Channel 4: Things We Won’t Say about Race that Are True; What British Muslims Really Think.
To: Trevor Phillips via Equality and Human Rights Commission <eass@mailgb.custhelp.com>, Wales <wales@equalityhumanrights.com>, Scotland <scotland@equalityhumanrights.com>, Media <media@equalityhumanrights.com>, “Tarique Ghaffur via Shahrokh Mireskandari: Dean & Dean” <info@deananddean.org.uk>, “Ali Dizaei: National Black Police Association” <info@nationalbpa.com>, Solicitors Regulation Authority <media@sra.org.uk>, “Simon Woolley: Operation Black Vote” <info@obv.org.uk>, Rothschilds Family via Rothschild & Co <contact@rothschild.com>, Jack Straw via Kate Hollern MP <kate.hollern.mp@parliament.uk>, Eric Kaufmann <e.kaufmann@bbk.ac.uk>, Les Ferdinand via Sharron Elkabas <sharron@mn2s.com>, Allison Ferreira <allison@mn2s.com>, MN2S <info@mn2s.com>, Old Boys Network <info@tobn.co.uk>, John Terry <press@johnterryacademy.com>, Ann Cryer via Univ of Bradford <press@bradford.ac.uk>, “The Times: Andrew Norfolk” <andrew.norfolk@thetimes.co.uk>, “Nottingham Univ: Matthew Goodwin” <M.J.Goodwin@kent.ac.uk>, Nigel Farage <nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu>, Annabelle Fuller <annabelle.fuller@gmail.com>, “Tony Blair: Institute for Global Change” <info@institute.global>, Media <mediabids@institute.global>
Cc: Martin Boon <martin.boon@icmunlimited.com>, ICM <enquiries@icmunlimited.com>, Litmus <litmus@icmunlimited.com>, Nadia Hussain via AK Artist Management <anne@akartistmanagement.com>, Aatif Nawaz <aatif@aatifnawaz.com>, Anjum Anwar via Christian Muslim Forum <info@christianmuslimforum.org>, Ummah TV <info@ummahchannel.tv>, Canon Chris Chivers <principal@westcott.cam.ac.uk>, United Society <info@uspg.org.uk>, Nusrat Lodda <lodda.92@hotmail.co.uk>, Amra Bone via Multifaith Chaplaincy <multifaith-chaplaincy@bristol.ac.uk>, Ed Davis <ed.davis@bris.ac.uk>, Rizwan Ahmed <bmcs@bmcs.org.uk>, Kalsoom Bashir <kalsoomchaplain@outlook.com>, Elham Manea <contact@elham-manea.com>, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown <y.alibhai-brown@independent.co.uk>, Rod Liddle via Spectator Editor <editor@spectator.co.uk>, “Fiyaz Mughal: Faith Matters” <info@faith-matters.org>, David Cameron via Alzheimers Research UK <enquiries@alzheimersresearchuk.org>, Miles Hewston <miles.hewstone@psy.ox.ac.uk>, “Britain First: Jayda Fransen” <admin@britainfirst.org>, “Alternative Right: James Lawrence” <newalternativeright@gmail.com>, “Anjem Choudary via UK: Society of Muslim Lawyers” <info@aml.org.uk>, Ismet Rawat <contact@bmelawyers4grenfell.com>

TO: Trevor Phillips et al:
Re: Channel 4: Things We Won’t Say about Race that Are True; What British Muslims Really Think.

CC: Britain First: J Fransen & Alt Right: J Lawrence; Islam4UK: A Choudary:
Re: EoP v Alt Right [eop-v-altright.tygae.org.za]; EoP v Jayda Fransen [eop-v-jkf.tygae.org.za]; EoP v James Lawrence [eop-v-jl.tygae.org.za].

Channel 4: Things We Won’t Say about Race that Are True:
Trevor Phillips via Equality and Human Rights Commission (eass@mailgb.custhelp.com); Wales (wales@equalityhumanrights.com); Scotland (scotland@equalityhumanrights.com); Media (media@equalityhumanrights.com); Tarique Ghaffur via Shahrokh Mireskandari: Dean & Dean (info@deananddean.org.uk); Ali Dizaei: National Black Police Association (info@nationalbpa.com); Solicitors Regulation Authority (media@sra.org.uk); Simon Woolley: Operation Black Vote (info@obv.org.uk); Rothschilds Family via Rothschild & Co (contact@rothschild.com); Jack Straw via Kate Hollern MP (kate.hollern.mp@parliament.uk); Eric Kaufmann (e.kaufmann@bbk.ac.uk); Les Ferdinand via Sharron Elkabas (sharron@mn2s.com); Allison Ferreira (allison@mn2s.com); MN2S (info@mn2s.com); Old Boys Network (info@tobn.co.uk); John Terry (press@johnterryacademy.com); Ann Cryer via Univ of Bradford (press@bradford.ac.uk); The Times: Andrew Norfolk (andrew.norfolk@thetimes.co.uk); Nottingham Univ: Matthew Goodwin (M.J.Goodwin@kent.ac.uk); Nigel Farage (nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu); Annabelle Fuller (annabelle.fuller@gmail.com); UKIP Contact Form; Tony Blair: Institute for Global Change (info@institute.global); Media (mediabids@institute.global);

Channel 4: What British Muslims Really Think:
Martin Boon (martin.boon@icmunlimited.com); ICM (enquiries@icmunlimited.com); Litmus (litmus@icmunlimited.com); Nadia Hussain via AK Artist Management (anne@akartistmanagement.com); Aatif Nawaz (aatif@aatifnawaz.com); Anjum Anwar via Christian Muslim Forum (info@christianmuslimforum.org); Ummah TV (info@ummahchannel.tv); Salaam UK Muslims in Britain Contact Form; Canon Chris Chivers (principal@westcott.cam.ac.uk); United Society (info@uspg.org.uk); Hamza Tzortzis Contact Form; Nusrat Lodda (lodda.92@hotmail.co.uk); Amra Bone via Multifaith Chaplaincy (multifaith-chaplaincy@bristol.ac.uk); Ed Davis (ed.davis@bris.ac.uk); Rizwan Ahmed (bmcs@bmcs.org.uk); Kalsoom Bashir (kalsoomchaplain@outlook.com); Elham Manea (contact@elham-manea.com); Yasmin Alibhai-Brown (y.alibhai-brown@independent.co.uk); Rod Liddle via Spectator Editor (editor@spectator.co.uk); Fiyaz Mughal: Faith Matters (info@faith-matters.org); David Cameron via Alzheimers Research UK (enquiries@alzheimersresearchuk.org); Miles Hewston (miles.hewstone@psy.ox.ac.uk).

Britain First: J Fransen & Alt Right: J Lawrence, Islam4UK: A Choudary:
Britain First: Jayda Fransen (admin@britainfirst.org); @JaydaBF; Alternative Right: James Lawrence (newalternativeright@gmail.com); Anjem Choudary via UK: Society of Muslim Lawyers (info@aml.org.uk); Ismet Rawat (contact@bmelawyers4grenfell.com)

Trevor Phillips et al:

EoP re: Channel 4: Things We Won’t Say about Race that Are True; What British Muslims Really Think.

Re: Channel 4: Things We Won’t Say about Race that Are True; Channel 4: What British Muslims Really Think.

This War Crimes aka Crimes of Aggression correspondence; is on behalf of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za]; whose preferences are available at Eco & Ego Literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] related to EoP v WiP [eop-v-wip.tygae.org.za] DeIndustrialization & Depopulation [eop-v-wip-deindpopn.tygae.org.za] Negotiations: Military Ethics Degeneracy Q [eop-v-wip-mil.tygae.org.za]: Who Should the Military Kill?.

All EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] Legal Submissions are essentially Truth & Reconciliation [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] submissions; which (a) clearly and simply clarify the – ‘right to breed/consume’ clauses of intnl law – root causes of all racial, religious, etc resource conflict; and (b) provide those guilty – plausibly due to lack of ego or ecological literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] character – of scarcity combatant crimes of aggression contributions to resource conflict; the opportunity to take responsibility for their breeding/consumption transgressions [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; by cooperating [eop-cooperator.tygae.org.za] to implement an EoP New World Order Social Contract that shall require all citizens of all nations, races and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

More specifically: EoP Applicants [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za] TRC process advocate’s the implementation of an EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] international law social contract that shall (a) require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za]; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; (b) nationalizes all property [eop-sdwipecon.tygae.org.za] and provide all responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za] citizens a property ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za] to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

Furthermore: if or when EoP intl law is implemented; EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] shall allow groups with subjective racial, religious& gender culture-conflict identities; who are willing to adopt responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] procreation, consumption and informed consent lifestyle changes, with  cultural law territorial self rule [cult-law-self-rule.tygae.org.za], enabling a higher degree of orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation.cooperation through the sharing of sub-cultural lifestyle values; in such self rule communities.

Re: Sympathy for Terrorism / Violent Acts.

EoP culture’s legal definition of ‘terrorism’ aka breeding or consumption scarcity combatant; was submitted to US Secretary of State: 03 Sep: US Sec State: EoP suggested Amendment of ‘terrorist’ org definition in S. 219 Immigration & Nationality Act (INA); excerpts of supporting evidentiary information include among others:

Implement EoP Scientific and Cultural Intnl Law Family Planning for Racial, Religious and Cultural Orderly and Humane De-Industrialization & Depopulation Planetary Revolution!

Deng Xiaoping introduced China’s one child policy in 1978-79, to halt – an average of 6 children per family – population growth. On 25 Sep 1980 an official public letter called on all citizens to adhere to the one child policy. The One Child policy was enacted and managed by the National Population and Family Planning Commission, through incentives, persuasion and coercion. Unofficial figures claim approximately 300-400 million births were prevented between 1978-2015. A 2008 survey reported that 76% of the Chinese public support the law. Less than 10% of Chinese families have taken advantage of the Chinese governments relaxation of the law to a two child policy; citing environmental and economic reasons for their adherence to the one child policy rule. Each child increases a parent’s carbon footprint by a factor of 20.
– Mojo: 10 China’s One-Child Policy Facts; Suzanne Transki: One Child Policy Documentary; ASPO: Al Bartlett on China’s One Child Population Policy. Paul Murtaugh: Reproduction & the Carbon legacies of individuals.
» IG: 17-08-29_eopaxis-famplanningrevcomm; 17-08-30_garrettmurtaugh-cnfamplanning.

Sayyid Qutb: Character & belief based on Reason & Freedom from Servitude:
It is not the intention of Islam to force its beliefs on people, but Islam is not merely “belief.” As we have pointed out, Islam is a declaration of the freedom of man from servitude to other men. Thus it strives from the beginning to abolish all those systems and governments which are based on the rule of man over men and the servitude of one human being to another. When Islam releases people from this political pressure and presents to them its spiritual message, appealing to their reason, it gives them complete freedom to accept or not to accept its beliefs. However, this freedom does not mean that they can make their [WiP consumption/breeding] desires their gods .. Only when the [WiP] idolatrous tyranny is overthrown, will people be free to reconnect with God’s universal order – [EoP Amended] Sayyid Qutb; Milestones, In the Shade of the Quran.
» IG: 17-08-26_eopwin-wiplose-lutherqutb.

Sunni & Shia Imam’s Endorse Small Families & Compulsory Family Planning:
“Smallness of a family (qillat al’ayal) is a facility (yusur) and its largeness (Kathrat) results in faqr (indigence, poverty). … the best of people (Khayar al-nas) is one who has less burden of children on his back (Khafif al-zahr min al-ayal) – Imam Ghazzali, a Muslim theologian, philosopher and Sufi of great eminence.

Birth control is permissible – Imam Abu Hanifa, Imam Malik, Imam Ibn Hanbal, Imam Shafi’i, Imam Ghazzali,  Small family is a bliss … excess children creates great worries – Imam Abu Hanifa & Imam Ja’afar al-Sadiq  Under certain conditions, family planning is not only morally permissible, but should be made compulsory – [paraphrased] Maulana Saeed Ahmad Akbarabadi & Imam Taymiyyah
– Asghar Ali Engineer; The Qur’an, Women and Modern Society: Islam and Family Planning
» IG: 17-08-22_ashgaralieng-islam-famplanning; 18-08-22_danapittard-mlk-fplanning; 17-08-28_danapittard-fplanning-2.

 

Re: What if British Muslim / Christian / Atheist / Masonic War is Peace social contract framework collides with Ecological Finite Resource Reality?

“I can see the price of war on every single one of the price tags in the bazaar. … There’s a moment where you fear in your body that any [EoP] rules are better than no [WiP] rules. If you have complete anarchy and no one is constrained in any way, then there’s nothing I can really do to protect myself. But if there’s a system of [EoP] rules, even if I don’t like the rules, that at least I can think, how can I play by them so that I can keep myself alive.” – [EoP Amended] Aisha Ahmad; author: Jihad & Co: Black Markets and Islamist Power; CBC Radio: Follow the money to understand why Islamist groups succeed, says Jihad & Co author.
» IG: 17-10-27_eopvwip-rulespollution.

EoP Functional Interpretation of Reality Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks:

Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] and EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] are EoP culture’s functional group shared system of thought and action frame of orientation and object of inter-species relating devotion interpretation of reality for individuals whose object of devotion/values include: (i) honest – race, religious, gender and cultural – relationships; (ii) an ecological carrying capacity based perspective of observable factual social contract reality; and (iii) non-violent cooperative root cause problem solving.
– 24 Nov: IBANet Julian Assange Conversation: EoP Re: EROEI Root Cause of Legal System Collapse.

**

The process of implementing EoP Intnl law would require individuals to prioritize honesty and cooperative root cause problem solving to themselves and others, which ultimately may result in a conscious or unconscious shift in such individuals identity values from racial/religious primary identity values to honour primary identity values, with race, religion or ideology as secondary to honour.

The ultimate outcome of EoP Intnl law is a society where everyone’s primary identity value is honour identity. The outcome of secondary identity values could result in the society being 9 or 90% European, or Asian, or Catholic, or Muslim, depending on how many of those individuals adopt honourable cooperative problem solving as their primary identity.
– 20 Sep: EoP culture re: Trump, Charlottesville ‘cultural relativism’; price of bourgeois culture, etc.

Jack Alpert: Q: How Many Children / Much Consumption Per Family Leads to Peace or War?.

In Peace seekers have no plan for enduring peace, Dr. Jack Alpert argues that Peaceniks failure to move society from conflict to peace, their establishment of never ending or honoured “peace accords, moral codes, acts of economic justice, and environmental laws, are like traffic signals” which “cause people to relinquish freedoms” but, “do not stop (change) the behaviors that increase scarcity, conflict, and environmental destruction”: “result from a faulty perception of what increases or decreases conflict. Where, peace seekers have acted as if conflict is caused by bad leadership maybe they should have acted as if trends in conflict are driven by trends in scarcity. Maybe they would have been more successful if they acted as if trends in scarcity are driven by the collective behaviors of 6 billion people. That while each individual acts benignly to achieve personal objectives the unintentional result is an increase in scarcity and conflict.”

Another reason for ignoring the above view of human conflict – according to Dr. Alpert — is that peace seekers, even when successful at restraining the police, military or mediating hostilities, do not change our course toward conflict. They only delay it. In the process, peace seekers consume the very energy required to change the things that would make societies head toward peace.

In Human Predicament: Better Common Sense Required: The Future of Social Conflict, Jack Alpert challenges us to answer two questions Corporate Oligarchs who profit from Unsustainable procreation (demand for more consumers), production and consumption, including its scarcity-conflict resource war consequences; do not want citizens, politicians, police, judges, prosecutors and those tasked with national security to ask themselves.

Let’s consider that Peace and conflict are defined not as descriptions of behaviour between nations, but as trends describing social conditions. Put differently: Conflict is not defined as the violence between neighbours and nations, but as the unwanted intrusion of one person’s existence and consumption behaviour upon another person.

There are two kinds of conflict:

* Direct: he took my car, he enslaved me, he beat me, he raped me, he killed me; and Indirect. Indirect intrusions are the by-product of other people’s behaviour.

* Indirect: ‘All the trees on our island were consumed by our grandparents,’ is an indirect intrusion of a past generation on a present one. ‘The rich people raised the price of gasoline and we can’t afford it,’ and ‘The government is offering people welfare to breed more children’ are current economic and demographic intrusions by one present group on another present group. Free Trade enabling overexploitation, overproduction and overconsumption of a nation natural capital resources is an economic intrusion by one set of oligarchs upon another set of citizens whose lives depend on such natural capital.

System conflict is the sum of intrusions experienced by each constituent, summed over all the constituents. A measure of the existing global conflict is the sum of six billion sets of direct and indirect intrusions. A measure of the UK’s conflict is the sum of 62 million sets of direct and indirect intrusions.

Using this definition of conflict, any citizen, politician, policeman, judge or legislator sincerely concerned about finding out whether and how the United Kingdom’s socio-economic and political system is moving towards peace or towards conflict; can do so, by determining the answers to the following questions:

Procreation Footprint: How many children per family leads to peace; or conversely how many children per family, contributes to greater resource scarcity, and exponential increase in conflict, i.e. an individuals’ ‘breeding war combatant’ status? [According to the research of Dr. Jack Alpert, the global answer – currently based on current population numbers — is one child per family leads to peace; two or more children leads to conflict]

Production/Consumption Carbon Footprint: How much exploitation and production of non-renewable and renewable natural resources relative to the nation’s Natural Capital carrying capacity footprint leads to peace; or conversely how much of a nation’s non-renewable and renewable natural resources can or should a corporation exploit into production of consumer goods, before such exploitation and production contributes to greater resource scarcity and exponential increase in conflict; i.e. an individual or corporations ‘consumption/production combatant’ status? [All utilization of non-renewable natural resources—fossil fuels, metals, and minerals—at any level, contributes to scarcity-conflict. Peaceful utilization of Aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric natural habitats requires that they be degraded only at levels less than or equal to the levels at which they are regenerated by Nature. Exploiting renewable resources above their capacity to regenerate is not sustainable and does not contribute to peaceful resource relations; i.e. contribute to scarcity-conflict.]

In the absence of the worlds political, economic and corporate leaders confronting and acknowledging the difference between sustainable peaceful consumption and procreation and unsustainable scarcity-conflict aggravating consumption and procreation; and implementing legislation and Jurisprudence in accordance thereto; Dr. Alpert provides proof how the global AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence Suicide Freight Train has as much chance of muddling through the coming ‘Falling Man Syndrome’ Crisis of Conflict, as an individual sitting in an unbelted car crash. (Non-Linearity and Social Conflict)

Alpert compares humanity’s belief that “in 200 years, our Right to Breed and consume has resulted in the exponential consumption of over half of the Earth’s resources, and nothing bad has happened yet”; to a man who has fallen out of a 150 story building, passing the window of the 60th story, calling out to a friend “‘I’ve fallen 90 stories in the past 5 seconds and nothing bad has happened yet”.
— SS DEFCON: SQSwans: Jack Alpert.

Ego/Eco literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] communication policy values value all sincere – no matter how racial, religious, class or gender politically incorrect – questions, constructive criticism, clarification of errors of in EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] etc principles.

A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za].

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk

.