13 Dec: EoP Response to L Keith: Hueston Hennigan: EoP NTE Questions for Guy McPherson v Mike Sliwa et al

* Lierre Keith
» Hueston Hennigan, Steven Feldman, Guy McPherson, Michael Sliwa, Cory Morningstar, Derrick Jensen, Lierre Keith, Keith Harmon Snow,
* 13 Dec: EoP Response to L Keith: Hueston Hennigan: EoP NTE Questions for Guy McPherson v Mike Sliwa et al.
» 12 Dec: Hueston Hennigan: EoP NTE Questions for Guy McPherson v Mike Sliwa et al.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v Guy McPherson, EoP v Keith H Snow, EoP v Lierre Keith, EoP v Mike SliwaEoP v Derrick Jensen / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: L Keith <lierrekeith@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:56 PM
Subject: Re: Hueston Hennigan: EoP NTE Questions for Guy McPherson v Mike Sliwa et al:
To: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>

Please stop emailing me.

.

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 1:02 AM
Subject: EoP Response to L Keith: Hueston Hennigan: EoP NTE Questions for Guy McPherson v Mike Sliwa et al
To: Lierre Keith <lierrekeith@yahoo.com>
Cc: “Hueston Hennigan: Steven Feldman” <sfeldman@hueston.com>, Guy McPherson <guy.r.mcpherson@gmail.com>, Michael Sliwa <mikeyjonsliwa@gmail.com>, Cory Morningstar <elle-provocateur@start.ca>, Derrick Jensen <derrick@derrickjensen.org>, Keith Harmon Snow <keith.harmon.snow@gmail.com>

TO: Lierre Keith (lierrekeith@yahoo.com)
CC: Hueston Hennigan: Steven Feldman: Re: Guy McPherson v Michael Sliwa et al

Hueston Hennigan: Steven Feldman: Re: Guy McPherson v Michael Sliwa et al:
Hueston Hennigan: Steven Feldman (sfeldman@hueston.com); Guy McPherson (guy.r.mcpherson@gmail.com); Michael Sliwa (mikeyjonsliwa@gmail.com); Cory Morningstar (elle-provocateur@start.ca); Derrick Jensen (derrick@derrickjensen.org); Keith Harmon Snow (keith.harmon.snow@gmail.com)

Lierre

EoP Response to L Keith: Hueston Hennigan: EoP NTE Questions for Guy McPherson v Mike Sliwa et al:

Received your 12 Dec “Please stop emailing me” response to my 12 Dec correspondence to Hueston Hennigan: EoP NTE Questions for Guy McPherson v Mike Sliwa et al.

Could you clarify how I should interpret your response, with regard to the questions I submitted to Hueston Hennigan: Steven Feldman for the response by Guy McPherson, Michael Sliwa, Cory Morningstar, Derrick Jensen, Keith Harmon Snow and yourself.

If EoP Scientific and Cultural [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] Responsible Freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] law is implemented as international law, legally or militarily by 2018, latest 2020, enabling immediate orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation; including nuclear decommissioning; enabling lands formerly used to produce food or shelter products for these unborn/dead individuals to return to their natural grasslands and/or forests state enabling the resurrection of biodiversity for other species on these lands, enabling the Genghis Khan The Green EoP Reforestation Effect, removing millions and millions of tons of carbon from the atmosphere; it is possible that such massive depopulation and reforestation would be able to effect an NTE climate change U-turn?.

If the answer is Yes implementing EoP Intnl law would be able to effect an NTE climate change U-turn: Would you Lierre Keith be willing to cooperate to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] Responsible Freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] law; by signing your responsible freedom oath and recommending to your DGR, etc colleagues and followers to sign their responsible freedom oaths; to provide military officials and per their scientific global sustainable security military necessity recommendations to political leaders; with a ‘responsible freedom’ security mandate to begin official public negotiations to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law?

Should I interpret your ‘Please stop emailing me’ as you don’t know whether EoP Intnl law would be able to effect an NTE climate change U-turn, but if it could you would – (a) Maybe: You may be willing, but you need more information or you are stalling for some or other reason; or (b) No: You would not be willing – to cooperate with military and political officials to provide them with a mandate to implement EoP Intnl law?

Should ‘Please stop emailing me’ be interpreted as you answering ‘Maybe’ or ‘No’?

If ‘maybe’; kindly clarify what information you need to help you to make a fully informed Yes or No decision. If so: I don’t know if I will be able to provide you with the information you may require, but if I don’t know what the questions are, I can’t attempt to provide you with answers, or ask someone who may be willing to provide you with answers.

If ‘No’. My apologies for bothering you with EoP questions.

Transparency Disclosure – possibly military psychotronically manipulated – relevant:

I received your ‘Please stop emailing me’ response almost immediately after I had provided my feedback – 13 Dec: [2] EoP Re: Jason Brent: Thoughts on Coming Destruction of Civilization – to former Judge Jason Brent’s request for feedback to his article: 08 Dec: Jason Brent: Thoughts on the Coming Destruction of Civilization; which includes the following:

JB: 36) While the UN’s demographers are not Gods and cannot guarantee the future of their predictions, they are among the best on the planet and, therefore, humanity cannot and must not ignore their predictions. Do not attack their predictions unless you can provide substantial facts and evidence that their predictions are incorrect.

LJ: I don’t attack anyone’s predictions. I evaluate any individuals predictions on whatever subject they are making predictions, based upon the same principles: How clearly and simply are their predictions explained, and do they answer questions about possible misunderstandings about their predictions. If so, based upon ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] communication principles. If they refuse to answer questions, do they have good reasons for doing so; or what could be the reason for their failure to answer questions about their prediction?

A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za].

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA
GMC 4643-13 & 2578-14 Pro Se Applicant
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk

.