* Bernice Eglyn Boon, George Hospital, Nadia Ferreira.
* 18 Feb: Dr BE Boon: Request for Info Re: CAS 572-02: State v LJ statements.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: State v L Johnstone, EoP v Dignitas / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Psych / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 2018-02-19 12:07
Subject: Dr BE Boon: Request for Info Re: CAS 572-02: State v LJ statements.
To: Dr Bernice Eglyn Boon <Lynnie.Boon@westerncape.gov.za>
Cc: “Western Cape Gov: Eden: Nadia Ferreira” <Nadia.Ferreira@westerncape.gov.za>
TO: Dr Bernice Eglyn Boon (Lynnie.Boon@westerncape.gov.za)
CC: Western Cape Gov: Eden: Nadia Ferreira (Nadia.Ferreira@westerncape.gov.za)
CC: Mag Derek Torlage & Guts Essel:
Magistrate Derek Torlage & Guts Essel via Clerk of Court.
Ref: 2578-14: LJ v FT Moe; 5408-15: LJ v CH Johnstone: Re 06 Oct 2016 [PDF]
Dr BE Boon: Request for Info Re: CAS 572-02: State v LJ statements.
If there are not enough people interested in cooperating with EoP Applicants [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za]; to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law to enable humane and orderly deindustrialization and depopulation [eop-v-wip-deindpopn.tygae.org.za]; and consequently Peak NNR [nnr-scarcity.tygae.org.za] nuke war and/or chernobyl x 451 collapse is the WiP future certainty; then if or when such a conclusion is reached; I would be better off using my limited resources to arrange my non-violent planetary departure.
» EoP Leg Sub: 11 Oct: GMC CAS 572-02: State v LJ & 2578-14: LJ v Frode & Talitha Moe; 18 Feb: Frode Moe: Upd Re: 2578-14: LJ v FT Moe Court Proceedings.
I am writing to enquire whether you would be willing to voluntarily answer questions regarding your mental disorder allegation statements in George Magistrates Criminal Court: Case C572-02: State v L Johnstone:
 In 2002 I was involved as an activist in the 18 June 2002 Political Necessity Trial in George (CAS 572/02; GSH 20/2003): The social activism education issues were:
Subjective Reasonableness of Activism based upon Necessity Defense:
 Political and Military Necessity Defence:
 The principles of my necessity defence were: Overpopulation and Consumption cause: 1. Resource depletion and scarcity and consequently resource wars including biological and chemical warfare and terrorism; and 2. Political correct suppression of the overpopulation and over-consumption causes of resource wars result in covert biological and chemical warfare military population reduction policies; such as the Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS. If we want to end covert military depopulation culling warfare policies; we must address the root causes of socio-cultural ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ policies which cause overpopulation and over-consumption and consequently result in covert military depopulation culling warfare policies.
 Additionally on 27 June 2002, Mr. Anton Marx was appointed as my Legal Aid Attorney. Upon Mr. Marx’s arrival in court postea he refused point blank any attempts on my part to inform him of my reasons for admitting to the acts charged and their relation to my intended Political Necessity Defence. He insisted, without listening to me, that he would not allow me to admit to act as charged, even if he had me certified as insane, which he accused me of being. ….….
 I am unaware of the details of Mr. A. Marx’s cognitive decision-making process whereby he formed his opinion as to my alleged Insanity before he ever met me or spoke to me, or how, since he had not had any consultation or conversation with myself. I imagine he was plausibly encouraged to consider me ‘insane’ due to a conversation with either a member of the Prosecution or SA Police, but have no evidence therefore. …..
 Mr. Marx stated that he had made enquiries to a psychiatrist, Dr. Boon at the George Hospital. ……..
 On 12 July 2002, Dr. Boon’s no longer confused, although very vague report [Annex B] was submitted to Court, before Magistrate Fortuin (Prosecutor Y. Sipoyo).
» EoP Leg Sub: 31 Dec: NPA WC & HQ, CC: US & RU Attorney General: TC of Affid ref to Irregular & Illegal Actions of NPA et al in George Case CAS 572-02: Annex BB: Affidavit of Lara Johnstone: Evidence in support of Lara’s Reply Affidavit statement alleging that the State’s 22 July 2002 J138A Transfer Warrant, authorizing Lara’s referral to Lentegeur, filed in CAS 572-01: State v Lara Johnstone: 18 June 2002 Political and Military Necessity Iatrogenic origins of AIDS bomb threat to the P.W. Botha Airport trial; was irregular and illegal [PDF].
Request for Info Questions:
 Were the mental disorder allegations you made on 10 July 2002 – [PDF]: Enclosure B: 10 July 2002: Dr BE Boon Psych Report – wherein you recommended Lara to psychiatric observation; a result of your own decision-making or based upon the suggestion and or requests of other – Anton Marx and/or NPA Prosecutor – individuals?
 If someone else’s suggestion or request: Who made such suggestions and what was their legal ‘mental disorder’ definition and evidence in support of such definition; or the evidentiary reasons for their request?
 If your own decisionmaking: What is your legal definition for a mental disorder; and was this your legal definition for a mental disorder on 10 July 2002? What was your legal forensic psychological doctrine rationale for your ‘mental disorder’ allegation decision-making from your first discussion with Anton Marx – on or around 08 July 2002 – to our meeting on 10 July 2002 – Paraphrased transcript: Dr Boon 10 July 2002 Interview [PDF] – and the authoring of your 10 July 2002 report?
Reasons for Request of Info Questions:
As noted in correspondence to Magistrate Torlage and Essel – 16 Feb: Mag D Torlage: Re: Update re 5408-15: LJ v CH Johnstone: Re 06 Oct 2016 letter: [G] 15 Feb 2018: Clive and Ann Johnstone ‘Consent to Lara Assisted Suicide’ written statements; [H] 16 Feb 2018: Lara Letter to Clive & Ann: Ack Receipt & Questions Re: 15 February 2018 written statements:
It would be legally unethical for Lara to submit Clive and Ann’s – We consent to Lara’s Assisted Suicide’; while we secretly believe Lara has a mental disorder – written statements to (a) The Russian Government; and/or (b) Dignitas in Switzerland; to request their help with Lara’s assisted suicide.
If Clive and Ann’s layperson mental disorder allegations are not ‘angry letting off steam’ but sincere conclusions; then the only way to help them to find out whether their conclusions are accurate or inaccurate; is by submitting all the evidence in support and against such ‘mental disorder’ conclusion to a Judge for them to enquire into and make a ruling on its accuracy or not.
If (a) Clive and Ann’s layperson mental disorder allegations are partially based on the ‘psychiatric observation’ referral allegations of ‘legal and/or psychologist experts’ during the George Airport Bombthreat Trial; and (b) none of the legal and/or psych experts who made such allegations ever provided Lara with their mental disorder legal definition and/or detailed evidence in support of such definition clarifying their reasons for why they made such allegations against Lara; (c) then its not possible for Lara to clearly and simply explain to Clive and Ann; why these legal and psych experts made the ‘mental disorder’ allegations that they did; and (d) Clive and Ann are left wondering: why exactly did these legal and psych experts accuse Lara of mental disorders; and (e) consequently Clive and Ann’s consent to Lara’s Assisted Suicide is not fully informed consent.
The ‘mental disorder’ allegations were either sincere or malicious. If sincere the evidence upon which the mental disorder allegations were made can be submitted to a Judge to confirm its accuracy or not, enabling such Judge to help Clive and Ann to make a fully informed decision as to the veracity or not of the mental disorder allegations.
A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za].
Lara Johnstone Pro Se