18 Feb: Upd Re: 2578-14: LJ v FT Moe Court Proceedings

* Frode Moe, Talitha Moe, Millers Inc, Douglas Henney, Arno Crous, Clive Johnstone, Ann Johnstone.
* 18 Feb: Frode Moe: Upd Re: 2578-14: LJ v FT Moe Court Proceedings.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v FT Moe, LJ v CH JohnstoneEoP v Dignitas / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Psych, EoP v WiP Religion / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@webmail.co.za>
Date: 2018-02-18 18:47
Subject: Frode Moe: Upd Re: 2578-14: LJ v FT Moe Court Proceedings.
To: Frode Moe <fro.moe@online.no>
Cc: Talitha Moe <lee.moe@telkomsa.net>, “Talitha Moe Counsel: Millers Inc: Douglas Henney” <Douglas@phinc.co.za>, Arno Crous <arno@millers.co.za>, Clive Johnstone <clann@telkomsa.net>, Ann Johnstone <annscg@telkomsa.net>

 

TO: Frode Moe (fro.moe@online.no)
CC: Talitha Moe (lee.moe@telkomsa.net); Talitha Moe Counsel: Millers Inc: Douglas Henney (Douglas@phinc.co.za); Arno Crous (arno@millers.co.za);

Clive & Ann Johnstone:
Clive Johnstone (clann@telkomsa.net); Ann Johnstone (annscg@telkomsa.net)

CC: Mag Derek Torlage & Guts Essel:
Magistrate Derek Torlage & Guts Essel via Clerk of Court.
Ref: 2578-14: LJ v FT Moe; 5408-15: LJ v CH Johnstone: Re 06 Oct 2016 [PDF]

Frode Moe:

Upd Re: 2578-14: LJ v FT Moe Court Proceedings.

Update Re: Formal Apology for Delay of 2578-14: LJ v FT Moe Court Proceedings; noted in 11 Oct: GMC CAS 572-02: State v LJ & 2578-14: LJ v Frode & Talitha Moe.

If there are not enough people interested in cooperating with EoP Applicants; to implement EoP intl law; and consequently Peak NNR nuke war and/or chernobyl x 451 collapse is the WiP future certainty; then if or when such a conclusion is reached; I would be better off using my limited resources to arrange my non-violent planetary departure.
» EoP Leg Sub: 11 Oct: GMC CAS 572-02: State v LJ & 2578-14: LJ v Frode & Talitha Moe.

As noted in correspondence to Magistrate Torlage and Essel – 16 Feb: Mag D Torlage: Re: Update re 5408-15: LJ v CH Johnstone: Re 06 Oct 2016 letter: [G] 15 Feb 2018: Clive and Ann Johnstone ‘Consent to Lara Assisted Suicide’ written statements; [H] 16 Feb 2018: Lara Letter to Clive & Ann: Ack Receipt & Questions Re: 15 February 2018 written statements:

It would be legally unethical for Lara to submit Clive and Ann’s – We consent to Lara’s Assisted Suicide’; while we secretly believe Lara has a mental disorder – written statements to (a) The Russian Government; and/or (b) Dignitas in Switzerland; to request their help with Lara’s assisted suicide.

If Clive and Ann’s layperson mental disorder allegations are not ‘angry letting off steam’ but sincere conclusions; then the only way to help them to find out whether their conclusions are accurate or inaccurate; is by submitting all the evidence in support and against such ‘mental disorder’ conclusion to a Magistrate for them to enquire into.

If Clive and Ann’s layperson mental disorder allegations are partially based on the allegations made by self described medical expert Frode Moe, then if or when Frode Moe is willing to submit all his evidence in support of his ‘mental disorder’ allegation conclusion to a Magistrate for them to enquire into; then such Magistrate’s ruling upon the evidence submitted; may be useful for Clive and Ann to consider.

Request for Legal Representation Info Re: LJ v Frode & Talitha Moe:

Counsel: Pro Se, Representation, Assistance/Standby/Advisory, Hybrid:

Pro Se: You represent yourself without any counsel.

Representation of Counsel: You or the court appoints lawyers as your primary strategic and tactical lawfare legal experts. Your lawyers listen to your statement of facts and interpretations and based thereupon they decide the winning strategy for the court proceedings. Your lawyer makes all statements on your behalf to the court, asks the witnesses questions; and you only speak to the court; when you are in the witness box.

Assistance of – Standby / Advisory – Counsel: Standby counsel or advisory counsel refers to a lawyer who assists a client who has invoked his right to self-representation. Put simply: You basically represent yourself – you make the final legal strategic or tactical lawfare decision – but your own appointed  or a court appointed Standby/Advisory Counsel lawyer, provides you with strategic and tactical lawfare legal procedure advice. You speak in court for yourself, ask the other party’s witnesses questions etc; and/or fill out the details of the contents of the legal applications. Your Standby Counsel helps you to formulate your questions, your strategy and makes sure that the documents you file – affidavits etc – are technically correct in accordance to court procedure requirements. They are like your legal secretary. Generally speaking people who ask for Standby Counsel are political activists; who make their own strategic and tactical advice decisions; but agree to Standby Counsel lawyers, to advice them on legal procedure issues: how to correctly file the required legal paperwork; so that the opposing parties lawyers can not ask the court for the case to be dismissed or thrown out of court on a legal technicality: ‘incorrectly formatted, filed, or signed ’ legal document. For example: In the recent US v Ammon Bundy criminal case in Oregon USA; many of the Bundy defendants waived their right to ‘Representation of Counsel’; but accepted ‘Standby Counsel’.[OPB: Ryan Asks to Dismiss Standby Counsel, dismiss charges [ archive.is/RGXIa]; KOIN: Judge OK’s Bundy Medenbach to be own lawyer [archive.is/vVyhe]. Scribd: Motion to allow Hybrid Counsel]; Federal Public Defender EDNC: Ellis & Winters LLP: Paul Sun Jr: Your Role as Standby Counsel [PDF]; NYU Law Review: The Role of Standby Counsel in Criminal Cases: In the Twilight Zone of the Criminal Justice System [PDF]. Standby Counsel understand that many times their clients primary goal is truthseeking or changing the law; citizen cooperative lawfare to help the courts to change the law and set better legal precedents; by educating the citizens about their particular issues in dispute. The primary focus is citizenship truthseeking; not resource thieving winning.

Hybrid Counsel: Hybrid Counsel is when a client and their lawyer switch between Assistance/Standby Counsel and Representation of Counsel. Sometimes you speak to the court about your case; and/or asks witnesses questions; and other times your lawyer speaks to the court; and/or asks witnesses questions.
» EoP Leg Sub: 11 Feb: Adv Marshall, Gauntlett, Buhr, Cilliers & van Zyl: Req Legal Service Quote & Info.

If you are willing to confirm in writing that you shall represent yourself Pro Se – like my father did in LJ v Clive Johnstone civil court proceedings – then I can file the documentation within the next two weeks, so that we can get the Magistrate to make an enquiry into the evidentiary accuracy of your ‘mental disorder’ allegations.

If you intend to hire attorneys to represent you: Are you willing to instruct your attorneys to refrain from attempts to getting the matter thrown out on legal technical issues; and to focus on helping the Magistrate to make an impartial enquiry into the evidentiary accuracy of your mental disorder allegations?

If you are not willing to instruct your attorneys to refrain from attempts to getting the matter thrown out on legal technical issues; and to focus on helping the Magistrate to make an impartial enquiry into the evidentiary accuracy of your mental disorder allegations; then I shall need to include in the application an In Forma Pauperis Request for Assistance of Standby Advisory Counsel to respond to your attorneys attempts to getting the matter thrown out on legal technical issues.

A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za].

Respectfully,

Lara Johnstone Pro Se

.