* CRL Rights Comm, Adv Pheagane Moreroa, SA Constitutional Court, Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng, International Court of Justice, Judge Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf, Judge Xue Hanqin, General Constand Viljoen, Thabo Mbeki, Robert McBride, IPID: Ind Police Inv Dir, Daniel Berger SC, The Bridge Group, Law Society of SA, Anthony Pillay, PsySSA: Psych Society of SA, Prof Tholene Sodi, SACC: SA Council of Churches, Bishop Malusi Mpumlwana, SA National Editors Forum, Katy Katopodis, SANGONeT: SA NGO Network, Kennth Thlaka, Russian Embassy in Pretoria, Amb Mikhail Petrakov, US Embassy in Pretoria, Ch d’Af Jessye Lapenn.
* 07 Mar: CRL Rights Comm: Re: EoP TRC to End Abel & Kane Cold War ideas for regulating churches: Draft: Statement of Claim: State of EoP TRC to End the Kane & Abel Cold War Negotiations.
» Draft: Referral to Mediation: State of EoP TRC to End the Kane & Abel Cold War Negotiations [PDF R2M]; Draft: Statement of Claim: State of EoP TRC to End the Kane & Abel Cold War Negotiations [PDF SoC]
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub / EoP ADR: LJ v Robert McBride, EoP CCT, The Citizen v Robert McBride, APD v Afriforum et al, EoP ICJ, EoP v Constand Viljoen, EoP SA Police, LJ v SANEF, LJ v Mikhail Petrakov / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMRU, EoP NTE GMZA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Psych, EoP v WiP Religion / EoP RH FR / EoP v WiP Neg.
DRAFT – 07 Mar 2018: SoC: Status of EoP TRC to End Cold War Negotiations – DRAFT
IN THE CIVIL MAGISTRATES COURT
DISTRICT OF GEORGE, HELD AT GEORGE
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
In the matter between:
|Robert McBride||1st Respondent [CCT 23-10]|
|CRL Rights Comm||2nd Respondent|
|Law Society of SA||3rd Respondent|
|PsySSA: Psychology Society of SA||4th Respondent|
|SA Council of Churches||5th Respondent|
|SA National Editors Forum||6th Respondent|
|SA NGO Network||7th Respondent|
|Constand Viljoen||8th Respondent|
|Thabo Mbeki||9th Respondent|
28 Feb 2018 draft copy notifications: Gen McChrystal & Viljoen.
DRAFT: STATEMENT OF CLAIM / FOUNDING AFFIDAVIT
CLARIFY STATUS OF EOP TRC NEGOTIATIONS
 This mediation / court application requests the CRL Rights Commission to clarify the status of EoP TRC Negotiations by (a) clarifying what information it requires to legally confirm and/or deny the Ecology of Peace culture as a distinct culture in South Africa with cultural rights and duties; (b) requesting South African social conflict experts constructive criticism to confirm and/or deny the legal certainty accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior principles; and if confirmed; (c) filing an application with the SA Constitutional Court to confirm the legal certainty accuracy of EoP RH FR principles; and if confirmed (d) requesting the Concourt to request the Min of Justice to file an application with the International Court of Justice to confirm the legal certainty accuracy of EoP RH FR principles; and if so; thereby implementing EoP Scientific and Cultural Law as international law.
[B] Cultural Membership:
Erich Fromm: Definition of Culture/Religion: Group-Shared System of Thought and Action that Offers the Individual a Frame of Orientation and an Object of Devotion:
“To clarify, “religion” as I use it here does not refer to a system that has necessarily to do with a concept of God or with idols or even to a system perceived as religion, but to any group-shared system of thought and action that offers the individual a frame of orientation and an object of devotion. Indeed, in this broad sense of the world no culture of the past or present, and it seems no culture in the future, can be considered as not having religion.
This definition does not tell us anything about its specific content. People may worship animals, trees, idols of gold or stone, an invisible god, a saintly person, or a diabolical leader; they may worship their ancestors, their nation, their class or party, money or success. Their religion may be conducive to the development of destructiveness or of love, of domination or of solidarity; it may further their power of reason or paralyze it.
.. A specific religion, provided it is effective in motivating conduct, is not a sum total of doctrines and beliefs; it is rooted in a specific character structure of the individual and, inasmuch as it is the religion of a group, in the social character. Thus, our religious attitude may be considered an aspect of our character structure, for we are what we are devoted to, and what we are devoted to is what motivates our conduct. Often however, individuals are not even aware of the real objects of their personal devotion and mistake their “official” beliefs for their real, though secret religion. If, for instance, a man worships power while professing a religion of love, the religion of power is his secret religion, while his so-called official religion, for example Christianity, is only an ideology.” – Erich Fromm, To Have or to Be, pp.135-136
 Lara remains willing to engage in sincere – aka ego/eco literate [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] – honourable, evidence based inter-cultural negotiations dialogue; with any individual of any race, religion, class, ideology, gender or profession; sincerely interested in (i) honest – race, religious, gender and cultural – relationships; (ii) an ecological carrying capacity based perspective of observable factual reality; & (iii) non-violent cooperative root cause problem solving.
 Lara, as EoP MILED Clerk on behalf of EoP Applicants; welcomes constructive criticism detailing errors of logic and/or reason in EoP Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors, group shared system of thought conduct motivator socio-cultural values.
[C] EoP TRC to End Abel & Kane Cold War: Abolish procreation & consumption in violation of ecological carrying capacity limits causes of resource conflict clauses of international law:
Alliance of World Scientists: World Scientists Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice [MG Copy] confirm (a) the root – socio-cultural lying and deceiving – causes of impending ecological collapse are procreation and consumption in violation of carrying capacity limits; (b) there is very little time to abolish the ‘right to breed/consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of international law root causes of all overpopulation and overconsumption causes of impending ecological and economic failed state collapse, and subsequent racial, religious and class resource conflict; and implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation.
[..] We need some sort of relationship like that between Washington and Beijing today, I think. And I do not mean in any way that we should rule the world together. What I mean is the [ecological & economic collapse consequences of WiP ‘right to breed/consume above ecological carrying capacity limits’ intnl law] challenges like we’re going to confront in the 21st century, challenges that could be [species ending] existential, challenges like climate change, challenges like enough water to drink, enough food to eat, and so forth — I’ve seen some projections that say — by climatologists whose views I respect, that say by the end of this century we could have only arable land and water enough for some half-billion people. What do we do with the other 9 billion? Where do we bury them? How do we deal with that kind of massive change in human relationships with this planet? So these are huge challenges. So what I’m saying is you need this kind of great-power relationship, this great-state relationship to begin to lead the [EoP truth and reconciliation responsible freedom] way for others to follow. — [EoP Amended] Lawrence Wilkerson: The Real News: Reality Asserts Itself with Paul Jay: Lawrence Wilkerson: Who Makes Foreign Policy? 01:02; If We Remain Predators; the Planet Will Cast us off: 03. [SQ Copy]
 Conservation of Resources:
“The conservation of natural resources is the fundamental problem. Unless we solve that problem it will avail us little to solve all others.” – US President Theodore Roosevelt.
‘an organization cannot have a conservation policy without having a population [and consumption] policy .. the sanity test – in which the candidate, confronted with an overflowing sink, is classified according to whether he reaches for the faucet or the mop.” – [EoP Amended] Daniel Benjamin Luten; Chemist & Resource Assistant to General McArthur; Sierra Club Bulletin; as quoted in: The Population Bomb: Population Control or Race to Oblivion by Paul Ehlrich & Behold a Pale Horse, by William Milton Cooper. A different Daniel B Luten was the ‘Luten Arch’ Bridge Builder Engineer.
 Soviet and American ‘Population and/or Consumption Control’ resource conservation efforts to encourage domestic and foreign policies to educate their citizens to amend ‘right to breed’ and ‘right to consume’ clauses of international law:
“Birth [& Consumption] Rates Must Come Down More Quickly Or Current Death Rates Must Go Up. There Is No Other Way.” – [EoP Amended] Robert McNamara, Worldbank President, 1970; Secretary of Defence from 1961 to 1968
[6.1] Soviet and Chinese Communism made significant efforts to educate citizens about one child only – ‘Economic freedom for women means sexual freedom, and sexual freedom means birth control’ – socio-economic benefits of population control, including severe ‘need to be shot’ penalties for consumption cheaters of nation’s resources.
Deng Xiaoping introduced China’s one child policy in 1978-79, to halt – an average of 6 children per family – population growth. On 25 Sep 1980 an official public letter called on all citizens to adhere to the one child policy. The One Child policy was enacted and managed by the National Population and Family Planning Commission, through incentives, persuasion and coercion. Unofficial figures claim approximately 300-400 million births were prevented between 1978-2015. A 2008 survey reported that 76% of the Chinese public support the law. Less than 10% of Chinese families have taken advantage of the Chinese governments relaxation of the law to a two child policy; citing environmental and economic reasons for their adherence to the one child policy rule. Each child increases a parent’s carbon footprint by a factor of 20. – Mojo: 10 China’s One-Child Policy Facts; Suzanne Transki: One Child Policy Documentary; ASPO: Al Bartlett on China’s One Child Population Policy. Paul Murtaugh: Reproduction & the Carbon legacies of individuals.
“[Individuals who refuse to voluntarily cooperate in consumption control] need to be shot for [their intentional and malicious consumption crimes of aggression]”. – [EoP Amended] General Secretary Nikita Khrushchev; Rokotov–Faibishenko case. The Rokotov–Faibishenko case was a criminal trial against financial speculators that took place in the Soviet Union in 1961. It also marked the start of a three-year campaign against large-scale economic crimes, accompanied by show trials. The case was tried in Moscow City Court beginning on May 31, 1961. The trial lasted thirteen days. On June 15, Rokotov, Faibishenko and Edlis were sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment and confiscation of all property. Lagun, the Papismedov brothers, and Rizvanova received eight-year sentences and had their illegally obtained property confiscated. Ilya Papismedov was sent to prison for six years. At this point the influence of General Secretary Nikita Khrushchev began to be felt, and with it the accompanying politicisation of the case. During the trial the KGB had arranged an exhibit featuring the group’s holdings: a mountain of valuables, Czarist gold coins, a mound of foreign banknotes, packets of Soviet money & bank deposit books. Khrushchev was invited & remarked, “They need to be shot for this”. It was taken for one of his angry outbursts, but he was serious this time.
[6.2] Socialist population and consumption control policies were embraced by some African socialist leaders such as Thomas Sankara, but with a few exceptions largely ignored by others:
In Black Viewpoint: KwaZulu Development: Chief M. Buthelezi makes the following statement clearly indicating that he is well aware of the concept of ‘carrying capacity’ and the famine, starvation, unemployment and poverty consequences of overpopulation although he – perhaps politely to his then Apartheid masters – ignores overconsumption: “My people were at first self-sufficient because there was enough to eat and no problems of population explosion.”
In Something New Out of Africa: The Challenge to Transform Country and Continent, the ANC Commission for Religious Affairs says: “Overpopulation is irresponsible”
In a 1992/93 Race Relations Survey by the SAfrican Institute of Race Relations (SAIRR), we are told that the high population growth is the cause of growth in poverty, unemployment and squatter camps, and most of the serious problems in South Africa; Population pressures are destroying the environment; the IFP and FRD call for ethics of 2 children per family as urgent population control priority; Population Growth outstrips Economic Growth for many years, and blacks avoid participation in family planning programs.
Operation Production is a Revolutionary Thing:
“To prevent the revolution from losing steam, Malema urged a full hall in the Ehlanzeni District Municipality building to have as many babies as possible. “Having babies is a revolutionary thing. You must reproduce!” – City Press: 05 March 2011: We want 60% of Anglo American, says Malema.
Especially evening assemblies girls had to attend as well: “They would come into the house and tell us we should go. They didn’t ask your mother they just said ‘come let’s go.’ You would just have to go with them. They would threaten you with their belts and ultimately you would think that if you refused, they would beat you. Our parents were afraid of them. All [young girls or women] opposing the wishes of the [ANC young cadres] were reminded, that it was every woman’s obligation to give birth to new “soldiers”, in order to replace those warriors killed in the liberation struggle. The idiom of the adolescents referred to these patriotic efforts as “operation production”. Because of exactly this reason it was forbidden for the girls to use contraceptives.” — Johannes Harnischfeger, Witchcraft and the State in South Africa
Opposing the Wishes of the ANC Cadres Operation Production:
‘I have been raped by comrades before. They force women to sleep with them, even now, because they have the power to do so. And no one dares to speak out. The culture of violence has never ceased to exist in the South-African ANC, even after the end of apartheid.’ – Ms. Fezeka Kuswayo.
The street committee members would go on house-to-house raids, forcefully taking young people, including young girls to go on street-patrols. There were then many reports of acts of sexual abuse and rape of young girls being taken to certain hide-outs and camps and being raped. As a result of fear of the comrades and cynicism towards the apartheid police these cases were never reported. — Mphutlane wa Bofelo; Racist, Sexist, Violent-Peddling, Malema Hate-Talk dangerous for the future, by Mphutlane wa Bofelo.
[6.3] American capitalism – including anti-war peaceniks – has never made any effort to restrict Americans or any nation’s consumption of resources; but did under some administrations – particularly Nixon – make significant efforts to support preventative family planning third world population control efforts and an international law population policy.
“Unlike plagues of the dark ages or contemporary diseases we do not yet understand, the modern plague of overpopulation is soluble by means we have discovered and with resources we possess. What is lacking is not sufficient knowledge of the solution but universal consciousness of the gravity of the problem and education of the billions who are its victims. – Martin Luther King: Margaret Sanger Human Rights Award Acceptance Speech 1966; World Population Balance.
[6.4] When Western Capitalist population control efforts failed, Capitalists had little hesitation in enabling its military industrial complex to profiteer from culling millions of third world overbreeders.
War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses. … I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service. I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested. During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents. – USMC Gen Smedley Butler: War is a Racket; Ratical & Quaker.
- March 27, 1972: Population And The American Future The Report Of The Commission On Population Growth And The American Future [PDF];
- 24 April 1974: Pres Nixon: NSSM 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for US Security and Overseas Interests [PDF]
- 10 Dec 1974: The Kissinger Report: NSSM 200: National Security Study Memorandum: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for US Security and Overseas Interests [PDF];
- 26 Nov 1975: NSDM 314: Ford’s Implementation of NSSM 200.
 Organized Religion interpretations of Religious Texts which encourage population and consumption control:
[7.1] Islam: Various Sunni and Shia Imam’s have spoken out in favour of family planning, including that under certain conditions it should be legally compulsory:
“Smallness of a family (qillat al’ayal) is a facility (yusur) and its largeness (Kathrat) results in faqr (indigence, poverty). … the best of people (Khayar al-nas) is one who has less burden of children on his back (Khafif al-zahr min al-ayal) – Imam Ghazzali, a Muslim theologian, philosopher and sufi of great eminence. | Birth control is permissible – Imam Abu Hanifa, Imam Malik, Imam Ibn Hanbal, Imam Shafi’i, Imam Ghazzali, Small family is a bliss … excess children creates great worries – Imam Abu Hanifa & Imam Ja’afar al-Sadiq Under certain conditions, family planning is not only morally permissible, but should be made compulsory – [paraphrased] Maulana Saeed Ahmad Akbarabadi & Imam Taymiyyah
– Asghar Ali Engineer; The Qur’an, Women and Modern Society: Islam and Family Planning.
[7.2] Sayyid Qutb’s Muslim Brotherhood interpretation of the Koran is highly critical of overconsumption.
[7.3] Christianity: In Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare, Michael Hoffman documents his interpretation of Christianity’s origins as a people who were opposing the occult Babylonian human factory farming sacrifice practices resulting from totalitarian agriculture population pressures.
[7.5] Catholicism: Pope John Paul I and Pope Francis support levels of international population control legislation to mitigate and prevent the aggravation of climate change.
“I have noticed two things that appear to be in a very short supply in the Vatican. Honesty and a good cup of coffee.” – Albino Luciano, the Smiling Pope, aka Pope John Paul I; In Gods Name: An Investigation into the Murder of Pope John Paul I; by David Yallop. Luciano wanted to amend Church’s ‘vatican roulette’ [Urban Dictionary, Independent] policies; and received the ‘Italian solution’ treatment given to the problem of an honest pope. . “Upon his election the current Pope learned of the changes that Luciani had proposed making. He was advised of the various consultations that his predecessor had had on a variety of problems. The fiscal information collected by Benelli, Felici, members of APSA and others on behalf of Luciani was made available to Wojtyla. He was shown the evidence that had led Luciani to conclude that Cardinal Cody of Chicago should be replaced. He was shown the evidence that indicated that Freemasonry had infiltrated the Vatican. He was advised of Luciani’s dialogue with the US State Department and the planned meeting with the Congressional Committee on Population and Birth Control. Villot also made the new Pope fully conversant with Albino Luciani’s attitude on birth control. In short Pope John Paul II was in the unique position to bring all Luciani’s plans to fruition. Not one of Luciani’s proposed changes became a reality. Whoever had murdered the Pope had not murdered in vain.” – David Yallop: In Gods Name: An Investigation into the Murder of Pope John Paul I; via Church and State.
[7.6] Hindu: Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy supported both responsible procreation and consumption.
And when I finally found the pencil and brought it to him he said, “Now I want you to sit here and learn two very important lessons… The first lesson is that even in the making of a simple thing like a pencil we use a lot of the world’s natural resources and when we throw them away we are throwing away the world’s natural resources and that is violence against nature. Lesson number two is that because in an affluent country we can afford to buy all these things in bulk, we over-consume the resources of the world. And because we over-consume them, we are depriving people elsewhere of these resources and they have to live in poverty. And that is violence against humanity.” – Mehitable Day: Mahatma Gandhi: The Little Pencil Story [SQ Copy]
[D] Truth & Reconciliation Commission Failure to Confront ‘War is Peace’ procreation & consumption Intnl law causes of resource conflict:
 Official submissions made to the TRC: (i) ANC [PDF]; Questions & Request Clarification [PDF]; Response to TRC Questions [PDF]; (ii) National Party [PDF]; Reply to Questions [PDF] Response to TRC Questions [PDF]; (iii) President De Klerk [PDF]; (iv) SA National Defence Force [PDF]; Gen GL Meiring [PDF]; Gen Magnus Malan [PDF].
 During and subsequent to the Truth and Reconciliation Proceedings, various complaints were filed alleging lack of impartiality and/or failure to address Cold War root causes of the resource conflict: (a) January 1998: Complaints to Public Protector of TRC Handling of SADF: Exec Summary [PDF]; Complaint [PDF]; (b) Feb 1998: SADF Generals: Assessment of the Probable Results of Activities of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission as perceived by Former Chiefs of the SADF IRO The SADF [PDF]; (c) 1999: SA Inst of Race Relations: The Truth about the Truth Commission by Anthea Jeffery [PDF]; (d) Aug 2005: Chandre Gould: South Africa’s chemical and biological warfare programme 1981 – 1995 [PDF]; (e) 16 Aug 2007: SAIRR: Business Day: The Truth Commissions chickens come home to roost [PDF]; (f) 2008: Gen van der Merwe: The Conflict of the Past: A Factual Review [PDF]; (g) 05 May 2010: N24: Tutu: The Truth Commission failed in some ways [PDF].
 On 03 May 2010 Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo’s Concourt confirmed Lara as an Amicus Curiae “member of the Radical Honesty culture and religion” [PDF]; in the SA Constitutional court matter of CCT: 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm.tygae.org.za]. The McBride case was a dispute about the accurate legal interpretation of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission proceedings, chaired by Archbishop Desmond Tutu.
 The EoP Amicus submitted to The Citizen v Robert McBride argued that South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was negligent and denied both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — breeding & consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict; including South Africa’s Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid resource conflict. Caveat: As of 17 Oct 2013, Lara is no longer a member of the Radical Honesty culture.
 In 2012 Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng, via Concourt Registrar Martie Stander refused Lara’s EoP Application for Review of (a) Afriforum v. Malema ‘Kill the Boer’ Mediation Agreement; (b) South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission Fraud; even though High Court Judge Lamont confirmed Lara’s submission in Afri-Forum and Another v Malema and Others as follows: “ Lara Johnstone, the sole member of an entity known as the Radical Honesty Culture and Religion delivered a number of documents by electronic transmission. I tabled the documents at the hearing and they form part of the record.”
 The CRL Rights Commission refused to (a) request the Constitutional Court Registrar and/or Concourt Justices to reconsider their decision to refuse to process the Ecology of Peace culture appeal requesting leniency of “Rules of Court” of the Registrar’s refusal to process the Ecology of Peace culture application to the Concourt Justices [PDF]; (b) request South African media editors to reconsider their refusal to publish a story to inform SA lawyers that a South African citizen member of the Radical Honesty culture, has been unable to find a lawyer to represent her, as a member of the Radical Honesty culture, for the past ten years, and in a current case before the Constitutional Court [PDF].
[E] Truth and Reconciliation Negligence Relief Requested:
 Respondents are requested to confirm or deny whether the TRC was negligent in denying both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — breeding & consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict; including South Africa’s Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid resource conflict.
 If Respondents confirm their subjective belief that the TRC was negligent in denying both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — breeding & consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict; including South Africa’s Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid resource conflict; to take responsibility as South African citizens to support sincere about root cause problem solving reconciliation of South Africa’s racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict issues in dispute; by considering their willingness to cooperate with the EoP MILED Clerk and EoP Applicants; EoP TRC to End Cold War relief requested.
[F] Conflict of Cultures Relief Requested: EoP TRC to End Cold War:
 Is General Constand Viljoen willing to walk your Afrikaner homeland talk by requesting the CRL Rights Commission clarify the status of EoP TRC Negotiations by legally confirming the Ecology of Peace culture – working on behalf of EoP Scientific and Cultural international law, that would enable non-violent ecologically sustainable land reform for the benefit of all responsible freedom citizens; including any and all citizens who would prefer to live in responsible freedom self-rule homelands – as a distinct culture in South Africa with cultural rights and duties?
 Is Former President Thabo Mbeki willing to walk your African Renaissance talk to request the CRL Rights Commission clarify the status of EoP TRC Negotiations by legally confirming the Ecology of Peace culture – working on behalf of an African and international responsible freedom Renaissance – as a distinct culture in South Africa with cultural rights and duties?
 Respondents ‘Statement of Cultural Defence / Cultural Notice to Oppose Reply’ should kindly include your socio-cultural military or legal or religious ethics constructive criticism as to errors of logic or reasoning in EoP Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors
 If objectively reasonable errors are received, Lara shall support a Magistrate or Judge to recommend to EoP Applicants to support editorial amendment and/or withdrawal; including if necessary written apologies by EoP MILED Clerk, on behalf of EoP Applicants; changes of the EoP Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors group shared system of thought and objective of devotion cultural value principles.
[19.1] In the absence of any respondents objectively reasonable constructive criticism as to errors of logic or reasoning in EoP Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors, all respondents are requested to support a request to CRL Rights Commission to file an application with the Constitutional Court to confirm the legal certainty accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles; which shall allow any individual or group of citizen/s or organization/s who object to the Constitutional Court’s legal certainty confirmation of the accuracy of EoP Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors; to provide the court with their socio-cultural military or legal or religious ethics constructive criticism as to errors of logic or reasoning in such Ecology of Peace cultural principles.
 If legal certainty is confirmed by Concourt: CRL Rights Commission is requested to request the Constitutional Court Justices to request the Minister of Justice to submit EoP Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors to the International Court of Justice for their legal certainty enquiry consideration; providing the Ministers of Justice of all UN General Assembly nations whose – legal, religious, mental health, charity and/or media social conflict experts, political parties, and/or citizens or organizations; who object to the International Court of Justice legal certainty international law confirmation of the accuracy of EoP Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors principles; to provide the court with their socio-cultural military or legal or religious ethics constructive criticism as to errors of logic or reasoning in such Ecology of Peace cultural principles.
 If the International Court of Justice confirms the legal certainty of the accuracy of EoP Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors Principles; such ruling is used as the legal certainty foundation to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law; and amend all International Treaties and International and National law statutes; accordingly.
 All nations Constitutional and/or Supreme Courts are then required to implement national, regional and local Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation proceedings to (a) provide individuals guilty of procreation, consumption and/or deception crimes of aggression; the opportunity to take responsibility for their former procreation, consumption and/or deception crimes of aggression; by (b) cooperating with their fellow citizens and government officials of all races, religions, classes, genders and ages to go to responsible freedom classes to learn ego and eco literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] skills on how to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits, and relate to other individuals in accordance to fully informed consenting relating values; so that they can confidently sign their responsible freedom oaths [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za]; and cooperatively enable humane and orderly deindustrialization and depopulation [eop-v-wip-deindpopn.tygae.org.za] of their nation to living in accordance to their ecological carrying capacity limits.
 If the SA Constitutional Court and/or International Court of Justice do not confirm the legal certainty accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles; the EoP MILED Clerk, shall apologize on behalf of EoP Applicants, in writing for their sincere; but incorrect working hypothesis conclusion as to the military, legal and religious ethical legal certainty accuracy of EoP Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors
Signed at ____________________ on this _______ day of ________________________.
Applicant / Claimant: Lara Johnstone, Personal Capacity / Pro Se
 28 Feb 2018: Re: Partial Suspension of EoP Truth & Reconciliation to End Cold War Negotiations; to Gen Stan McChrystal et al: http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2018/02/28-feb-stan-mcchrystal/ ; Gen Constand Viljoen et al: http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2018/02/28-feb-constand-viljoen/
 Address to the Deep Waterway Convention, Memphis; 4 Oct 1907.
 Sutton (1993/12)
 “[Individuals who refuse to voluntarily cooperate in consumption control] need to be shot for [their intentional and malicious consumption crimes of aggression]”. – [EoP Amended] General Secretary Nikita Khrushchev; Rokotov–Faibishenko case.
 Stephen Mumford: The Life and Death of NSSM 200: How the Destruction of Political Will Doomed a U.S. Population Policy
 Tribune 242: ‘Black People Breed Too Much’ Says Anglican Archdeacon.
 LJ v Brad Blanton http://lj-v-bb.tygae.org.za
 Alien on Pale Blue Dot v Afriforum, Julius Malema et al
 SCA 815-11 & EQ JHB 07-2010: Afriforum v. Malema
 Afri-Forum and Another v Malema and Others (20968/2010)  ZAEQC 2; 2011 (6) SA 240 (EqC);  4 All SA 293 (EqC); 2011 (12) BCLR 1289 (EqC) (12 September 2011)
 http:// apd-v-ajm.tygae.org.za/pdf/13-02-19_CRL-Makgoba-Ruling-CCTRegistar-C-121211.pdf
 http:// apd-v-ajm.tygae.org.za/pdf/13-02-07_CRL-Makgoba-Ruling-SAPAMedia_C-121211.pdf