13 Jun: Encl: DRAFT: Consent to Ecology of Peace CVID – weapons & power – Denuclearization Definition

* IAEA: Yukiya Amano; UNODA: UN Office for Disarmament Affairs: Sec Gen: Izumi Nakamitsu; Argentina Pres Mauricio Macri; Armenia Pres Armen Sarkissian; Belarus Pres Alexander Lukashenko; Belgium PM Charles Michel; Brazil Pres Michel Temer; Bulgaria Pres Rumen Radev; Canada PM Justin Trudeau; China Pres Xi Jinping; Czech Rep Pres Miloš Zeman; Egypt Pres Abdel Fattah el-Sisi; Finland Pres Sauli Niinistö; France Pres Emmanuel Macron; Germany Chancellor Angela Merkel; Hungary PM Viktor Orbán; India PM Narendra Modi; Iran Pres Hassan Rouhani; Israel PM Benjamin Netanyahu; Japan PM Shinzo Abe; North Korea Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un; South Korea Pres Moon Jae-in; Mexico Pres Enrique Pena Nieto; Netherlands PM Mark Rutte; Pakistan Pres Mamnoon Hussain; Romania Pres Klaus Iohannis; Russia Pres Vladimir Putin; Saudi Arabia King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud; Slovakia Pres Andrej Kiska; Slovenia Pres Borut Pahor; South Africa Pres Cyril Ramaphosa; Spain PM Pedro Sanchez; Sweden PM Stefan Lofven; Switzerland Pres Alain Berset; Taiwan Pres Tsai Ing-wen; Turkey Pres Recep Tayyip Erdogan; Ukraine Pres Petro Poroshenko; UAE Pres Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan; UK PM Theresa May; USA Pres Donald Trump; EU President Donald Tusk; OAU Chairman Paul Kagama, OIC Sec Gen Dr. Yousef bin Ahmad Al-Othaimeen; ASEAN Chair: SG MoFA: Vivian Balakrishnan; Magistrates Torlage & Essel, CH Johnstone, Frode Moe, SA Constitutional Court, Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng, Robert McBride, The Citizen, Brad Blanton; Interpol President Meng Hongwei; ICC: Prosecutors Office: Ms Fatou Bensouda; ICJ: Judge President AA Yusuf & VP X Hanqin; PCA: Permanent Court of Arbitration: Sec General Hugo Hans Siblesz.
* 13 Jun: IAEA: DRAFT: Consent to Ecology of Peace CVID – weapons & power – Denuclearization Definition [PDF]; Encl: DRAFT: Consent to Ecology of Peace CVID – weapons & power – Denuclearization Definition [PDF].
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub / EoP ADR: EoP v IAEA, EoP v Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, EoP v Emmanuel Macron, EoP v Angela Merkel, EoP v Hassan Rouhani, EoP v Benjamin Netanyahu, EoP Kim Jong-un, EoP v King Salman, EoP v Pedro Sanchez, EoP v RT Erdogan, EoP v Petro Poroshenko, EoP v Theresa May, EoP v Donald Trump, EoP v Alt Right, EoP v OAU, EoP v OIC, EoP v ASEAN, LJ v CH Johnstone, LJ v Frode Moe, The Citizen v Robert McBride, EoP SA Police Dept, LJ v Brad Blanton, EoP Intnl Police, EoP ICC, EoP ICJ / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Applicants | EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA, EoP NTE GMG, EoP NTE GMRU, EoP NTE GMZAEoP NTE GMKR | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: EoP Axis: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Psych, EoP v WiP Religion / EoP v WiP Neg.

DRAFT – 12 Jun 2018: Consent to EoP CVID denuclearization definition – DRAFT


___________________ [Date]

EoP MILED Clerk:

[Nation] _____________ Preliminary Consent to EoP CVID Denuclearization Definition.

I, [Title] _______________ of [Nation] _________________ , on behalf of [Nation] ________________ government; hereby confirm that I shall voluntarily authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency (“IAEA”) to supervise the Complete, Verifiable and Irreversible Dismantlement (“CVID”) denuclearization of all nuclear weapons and power plants on [Nation] __________________ territory; in accordance with EoP Axis Foreign Policy [eop-axis-forpol.tygae.org.za] requiring the EoP CVID denuclearization [eop-denuke-defn.tygae.org.za] of all nuclear weapons and power plants worldwide; within seven days of the International Court of Justice confirming the legal certainty accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] principles, thereby authorizing the implementation [eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za] of EoP Axis [eop-axis.tygae.org.za] recommended Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law; enabling orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation [eop-v-wip-deindpopn.tygae.org.za] return to living in harmony with ecological carrying capacity limits.

This consent is subject to the following Before/After EoP SciCult Law conditions: (I) Before: (a) my written notice of withdrawal of this consent; and/or (b) my removal from office as [Title] _______________ of [Nation] ____________; (II) After: Crimes of Aggression penalties for violation.


 _______________________________ [Signed]
 _______________________________ [Signed]
[Witness Name]

Clarification of Terms:

[EoP RH FR] EoP Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Transforming the World Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors:

Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] and EoP Scientific & Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] are EoP culture’s functional group shared system of thought & action frame of orientation & object of inter-species relating devotion interpretation of reality for individuals whose object of devotion/values include: (i) honest – race, religious, gender & cultural – relationships; (ii) an ecological carrying capacity based perspective of observable factual social contract reality; & (iii) non-violent cooperative root cause problem solving.

[1] Earth is not flat.
[2] Resources are finite.
[3] When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.
[4] Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
[5] The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.
[6] If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate [eop-cooperator.tygae.org.za] to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with Ecology of Peace clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.

EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za].

Scientific Law: Ecological Carrying Capacity — Eco Footprint [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za] — Scientific Law refers to: * Procreation below carrying capacity limits; * Consumption below carrying capacity limits.

Cultural Law: Human Nature Scientific Law refers to: * Fully Informed Consenting Agreements.

Individuals Rights and Duties under EoP SciCult law include: Responsible Freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] citizens are entitled to Property Ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za] and Cultural Self Rule [cult-law-self-rule.tygae.org.za].

Violations of SciCult Law are called Crimes of Aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]. Crimes of aggression will be sentenced as follows: (a) negligent: sent to ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] classes to learn how to communicate what they want and/or don’t want honestly, listen, confirm in/accuracy of interpretations, etc; (b) intentional: death penalty: they shall be given the opportunity to remove their genes from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of assisted suicide, within two weeks of sentencing and/or by a particular date as decided by the sentencing judge; and if not done by such date, will be humanely and orderly assassinated by law enforcement appointed assassination squad officials. EoP SciCult Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] includes court proceedings suggestions info.

Responsible Freedom Fully Informed Consent Self Rule [cult-law-self-rule.tygae.org.za]:
Under an EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] international law; Cultural Informed Consent laws shall allow responsible freedom individuals with sexual, violent, anti-social or fringe religious or cultural proclivities to lawfully relate to other individuals who share their particular fringe racial or religious socio-cultural self or other relating eccentricity – for example: Armin Meiwes and Bernd Brandes [Barcroft TV: Interview with a Cannibal[1]; All That’s Interesting: This Cannibal Placed An Ad To Eat Someone — And Someone Said Yes[2]; The Guardian: Victim of cannibal agreed to be eaten[3]] – in terms of fully informed consent relating practices in private venues.

EoP – Consumption x Procreation Factor – Footprint [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za].

As submitted to ICC Judges & ICJ Permanent Court of Arbitration Environmental Disputes Experts; as noted at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]: 29 Dec: ICC: Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi: Re: EoP ICC Private Pros: EoP PoW’s -v- Nobel Committee and Peace Laureates et al[4]; 03 Jun: PCA: Hugo Siblesz: EoP Re: Judge JBrent: SustDev academic fraudsters should be executed[5]; excerpts of which follow

A Sustainable society practices Sustainable Procreation and Sustainable Natural Resource Utilization Behaviour; i.e. all of its citizens consume and procreate below carrying capacity.  Sustainable Natural Resource Utilization Behaviour behaviour involves the utilization of renewable natural resources—water, cropland, pastureland, forests, and wildlife—exclusively, which can be depleted only at levels less than or equal to the levels at which they are replenished by Nature. The utilization of non-renewable natural resources (NNR’s)—fossil fuels, metals, and minerals—at any level, is not sustainable.

Carrying Capacity Sustainability: I=PAT Equation:
For activities to be genuinely sustainable it must be possible for them to continue indefinitely. The impact of humanity on the environment and the demands that people place on the resources available on the planet can be summarised by what is known as the Ehrlich or IPAT equation, I=PAT. I = impact on the environment or demand for resources, P = population size, A = affluence and T = technology. The two most important conclusions deriving from this IPAT footprint relationship are that: (i) the Earth can support only a limited number of people, at a certain level of affluence, in a sustainable manner; and (ii) Population and Consumption must be reduced to below carrying capacity.

Carrying Capacity aka Biocapacity Limits:
“The maximum number of individuals that can be supported sustainably by a given environment is known as its ‘carrying capacity’. Worldwide the total amount of biologically productive land and sea amounts to 12 billion global hectares (gha); or 1.8 gha each if divided by 6.7 billion each. Guerrylla Laws are drawn up in accordance with the proactive conservation policies of Bhutan, who set aside 40% of their biologically productive to be returned to its natural state, for other species and wildlife conservation purposes; then that means that the total amount of biologically productive carrying capacity land available to humans is 60% of 12 billion; which amounts to 7.2 billion gha total; or 60% of 1.8 gha, which is 1 gha each.  Population factor is relevant, because the more humans there are, the less biologically productive land there is for everyone else. For example:

Biocapacity limits of 6.7, 3.5, 1 Billion, 500, 250 & 100 Million:
7.2 billion global hectares of biologically productive land and water divided by (a) 6.7 billion humans, equals: 1.07 gha each; (b) 3.5 billion equals 2.05 gha each; (c) 1 billion equals 7.2 gha each; (d) 500 million equals 14.4 gha each; (e) 250 million equals 28.8 gha; (f) 100 million equals 72 gha each.

Procreation Factor:
As noted, the more people there are; the less biologically productive land there is available for everyone else. According to the research of Paul Murtaugh [sq-pmurtaugh.tygae.org.za], the procreation factor that should be added by ecology footprint organisations to their Consumption footprint calculators, is 20 per child. Put differently: Each Child increases a parent’s cumulative consumption footprint by factor of 20[6].

Sustainable (Leaver Eco-Innocent) v Unsustainable (Taker Scarcity Combatant):
An individuals IPAT footprint is a result of: (A) Consumption Footprint multiplied by (B) Procreation Factor (Every child increases parents footprint by factor of 20). If their IPAT footprint is below carrying capacity limits, they are an Eco-Innocent Leaver; if their IPAT footprint is above carrying capacity limits, they are a Scarcity Combatant Taker.



[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKzf-rG9JBs

[2] http://allthatsinteresting.com/armin-meiwes

[3] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/dec/04/germany.lukeharding

[4] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2015/12/29-dec-eop-v-nobel/

[5] http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2018/06/03-jun-pca-hsiblesz/

[6] http://ss-defcon.tygae.org.za/2009/07/31-jul-murtaugh-procreation-factor/