16 Jul: EoP Re: Belarus Embassy Req for Info tel call: RE: IAEA Draft: EoP Denuke Definition

* Alexander Sidoruk, Belarus Embassy, Vladislav Zhur, President of Belarus, Alexander Grigoryevich Lukashenko, Belarus Ministry of Defence, Gen Andrei Ravkov, Buckingham Palace, UK High Commission, Michael Portillo, Stan McChrystal, Arif Hasan Akhundzada, Paul Eaton, Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Vladimir Putin.
* 16 Jul: Belarus Embassy Req for Info tel call: RE: IAEA Draft: EoP Denuke Definition
» 17 Jul: Response from Third Secretary: Mr Vladislav Zhur
» 17 Jul: Response to Third Secretary: Mr Vladislav Zhur
» 17 Jul: Copy to: Gen Paul Eaton, Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v Belarus Emb RSA, EoP v Michael Portillo, EoP v Donald Trump, EoP v Rudy Giuliani, EoP v Alt RightEoP v US Political PartiesEoP v Alex Lukashenko / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Applicants | EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA: Cabinet; EoP NTE GMRU | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: EoP Axis: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP v WiP Neg.

Subject: Belarus Embassy Request for Information telephone call.
Date: 2018-07-16 22:16
From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@webmail.co.za>
To: Amb Alexander Sidoruk <rsa@mfa.gov.by>

Amb Alexander Sidoruk
Belarus Embassy
164, Orion Avenue, Sterrewag,
Pretoria, 0181 South Afriсa
Amb Alexander Sidoruk (rsa@mfa.gov.by)

Amb Sidoruk:

Re: Belarus Embassy Request for Information telephone call.

I received a telephone call this afternoon from someone at the Belarus Embassy. He said his name, but the line was not clear, and I did not clearly hear it.

Here is a paraphrased transcript of the call:

Belarus Embassy: I am calling from the Belarus Embassy, for Lara Johnson.

Lara Johnson: Yes, that’s me.

BE: We received a letter from you and I am calling to clarify some issues that are not clear.

LJ: Okay.

BE: The letter was about Ecology of Peace [unclear]. Some things are not clear.

LJ: If you send me an email and clarify what sentence or paragraph is unclear, I can clarify whatever is unclear for you.

BE: [Silence]

LJ: As far as I am aware I have only sent one letter to the Belarus Embassy, it was a letter to the heads of state of all Nuclear Power and Weapons nations, via their Embassies in South Africa [13 Jun: IAEA & UNODA: DRAFT: Consent to Ecology of Peace CVID – weapons & power – Denuclearization Definition]. It was a draft letter for their consideration to support President Putin and Trump and Kim Jongun to collectively denuclearize. Either we support EoP orderly and humane denuclearization, deindustrialization and depopulation or we will have to deal with the 509 Chernobyl consequences of WiP denuclearization, deindustrialization and depopulation.

BE: Thank you.

[End of call]

If the Belarus Embassy caller is still unclear, and is willing to clarify in writing – I answer all sincere questions irrespective of class and/or employment status – more specifically what about the Ecology of Peace correspondence he found to be unclear, I could further clarify the particular issue that he found unclear.

More recent individual specific –– Consent to Ecology of Peace CVID – weapons & power – Denuclearization Definition –– draft letters can be found at: 21 Jun: Ray Dalio: Draft: USA Consent to EoP CVID Denuclearization Definition; 07 Jul: Vladimir Putin: Draft: USSR Consent to EoP CVID Denuclearization Definition; 08 Jul: Michael Portillo: Draft: UK Consent to EoP CVID Denuclearization Definition.

A copy of this correspondence is documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za].

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk

.

Subject: Re: Belarus Embassy Request for Information telephone call.
Date: 2018-07-17 07:54
From: Embassy of Belarus in South Africa / Посольство Беларуси в ЮАР <rsa@mfa.gov.by>
To: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@webmail.co.za>

Dear Ms Johnson,

Good morning,

Thank you so much for our yesterday’s discuss as well as for your willing to clarify all the issues. We got everything.

Thank you.

Best regards,

Vladislav Zhur (Mr.)
Third Secretary
EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS IN THE REPUBLIC OF  SOUTH AFRICA
Address: 164 Orion Av, Sterrewag, Pretoria, 0181, South Africa
Tel.: (+2712) 4307709, 4307664
Fax: (+2712) 3426280
www.rsa.mfa.gov.by
E-mail: rsa@mfa.gov.by
Connect with us: Belarus in South Africa.

.

Subject: Re: Belarus Embassy Request for Information telephone call.
Date: 2018-07-17 12:58
From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@webmail.co.za>
To: Embassy of Belarus in South Africa / Посольство Беларуси в ЮАР <rsa@mfa.gov.by>
Cc: “President of Belarus: Alexander Grigoryevich Lukashenko” <press@president.gov.by>, “Belarus Ministry of Defence: Min of Defence: Andrei Ravkov” <modmail@mod.mil.by>, Buckingham Palace via UK High Comm <media.pretoria@fco.gov.uk>, Michael Portillo <michael@michaelportillo.co.uk>, Stan McChrystal <stan@mcchrystalgroup.com>, Arif Hasan Akhundzada <arif.hasan.akhundzada@gmail.com>

Mr. Vladislav Zhur
Third Secretary
Belarus Embassy in RSA

CC:
President of Belarus: Alexander Grigoryevich Lukashenko (press@president.gov.by)
Belarus Ministry of Defence: Min of Defence: Andrei Ravkov (modmail@mod.mil.by)
Buckingham Palace via UK High Comm (media.pretoria@fco.gov.uk)
Michael Portillo (michael@michaelportillo.co.uk)
EoP App & Obs: Stan McChrystal (stan@mcchrystalgroup.com); Arif Hasan Akhundzada (arif.hasan.akhundzada@gmail.com)

Mr. Zhur:

Received.

This is a multi-tasking response – extra detail is for EoP Leg Sub readers who prefer more details.

As someone coming from a country that has dealt with the consequences of an industrial nuclear accident – Wikipedia: Chernobyl: Finest HQ: Zero Hour: Disaster at Chernobyl; DW: Belarus: The Children of Chernobyl – I don’t imagine to experientially know what your ‘We got everything’ statement means.

I don’t know if efforts to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law – enabling orderly and humane EoP Land Reform [eop-landreform.tygae.org.za] prisoner release [prisoner-pardon.tygae.org.za] denuclearization [eop-denuke-defn.tygae.org.za] deindustrialization and depopulation [eop-v-wip-deindpopn.tygae.org.za] return to living in harmony with ecological carrying capacity limits – will be successful or not.

If military are not supportive I don’t think it can be done.

If military are supportive and cooperate, I imagine, it can be done fairly quickly – 5 years or so; depending on the good will cooperation of government officials and citizens; and how quickly those with no good will eliminate themselves [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za] – honourably or with the help of military assassination squads – from the genepool.

Some military are supportive; others not: presumably they got balls to mass murder and play fuck honour deception games, but they ain’t got balls to take a look in the goddamn mirror and take buck stops here [eop-rh-cult-info.tygae.org.za] responsibility for their actions, beliefs and motives; or their obstructionism is due to some other reasons.

So we shall have to see whether these fuck honour mass murder hitmen pretending to be generals, colonels, majors etc; give a fuck about cooperating or not; marching off to wars to steal other races, religions resources on the orders of fuck honour resource thieving breeding and consuming like niggers on steroids civilians orders; and wondering why sincere peaceniks have fuck all respect for their medals.

As you can probably tell, my patience is wearing thin.

At least some military are capable of hearing criticism. Don’t expect that ‘give a fuck about thinking and listening’ luxury with emotionally retarded children pretending to be lawyers.

Some lawyers consider me emotionally retarded. If they gave a fuck about honesty they would admit: We are members of different cultures with different cultural values. In my EoP culture honest face to face emotion is a sign of health and suppressing honest emotion or expressing it behind the persons back; is retarded fuck honour hypocrisy. In their WiP culture honest sincere face to face emotion is retarded; and being a two faced emotional hypocrite is emotional health.

Not a problem where lawyers clearly admit the clear definitions of their cultural values and terms. Big problem when lawyers think just cause you got a particular skin colour, or gender parts, you are a member of a particular racial or gender group.

The RAF / Baader Meinhof used to say that the sexual liberation is part of the anti-imperialist struggle.

Sexual liberation is part of anti-imperialism; but I would probably disagree with the RAF’s definition of sexual liberation, if my interpretation of their concept of sexual liberation is accurate.

Scientific sexual liberation – scientific: breeding and consuming below ecological carrying capacity limits  – is part of the anti-imperialist struggle.

Cultural sexual liberation – cultural: naturalist naked, tits and ass slut naked, naturalist naked under a burqa, tits and ass slut naked under a burqa, and so on sexual liberation values, are cultural – are not part of the objective anti-imperialist struggle, but they could be subjectively part of some women’s inner-ego dictator anti-imperialist struggle.

If or when a woman who has the freedom to choose to be naturalist naked woman considers herself ‘sexually suppressed’ then she can adopt a different ‘tits and ass slut naked’ or ‘burqa naturalist’ or ‘tits and ass slut under a burqa’ or whatever cultural value she subjective considers could be more sexually liberated; to ascertain whether she feels more liberated or not. She can experiment with them all, and then choose which one suits her best.

She can do so in an EoP SciCultLaw social contract society; but not in a WiP social contract society; where most women are considered to be nothing more than the factory brood sows, or trophy wives; for fuck honour men addicted to breeding fuck honour unwanted and hated children; or strutting around the world stage. Men on the other hand are trapped in WiP social contract being women’s security cheap labour, or sperm donors or walking wallets.

If a woman wants to be the brood sow for a fuck honour man, in an EoP SciCult law society, she can breed one child, no more. She cannot demand to live a consumption lifestyle above carrying capacity limits. If she can find a man who wants to fuck her, she can fuck all day. If she cannot she can find one she can pay to fuck her all day. If she wants to find a man to make love to, they can make love all day; and so on.

In Radical Honoursty EoP culture emotional sexual liberation is part of the cultural sexual liberation of the anti-imperialist struggle. Emotional sexual liberation is considered part of sexual liberation because it enables the release of emotions, which can enable stronger emotional connections; and which if or when suppressed contribute to sexual repression energies. Put differently women who are emotionally more liberated, are not as sexually frustrated as women who suppress their emotions.

Individuals from other cultures who have different cultural sexual emotional liberation values – from politeness, to manners, to etiquette, to suits to burqa’s, no bra’s to chastity belts – who choose to adopt EoP scientific law procreation and consumption values, would still be members of the EoP SciCult Law culture. They would live in their ‘polite sexual liberation’ cultural tribe, and when they travel to an ‘emotional sexual liberation’ tribe, they can have an honest inter-cultural discussion, where neither way is objectively ‘right or wrong’; or ‘superior or inferior’; although of course their subjective choice to adopt one or the other would mean subjectively they consider it the ‘superior sexual liberation’ method that subjectively works for them. If they don’t like or have no skills to practice a particular cultural value, they will say: I will stay out of your tribal territory, because I don’t have the skills to communicate in accordance to your cultural values. I don’t visit Buckingham Palace – if they would let me in – cause I don’t give a fuck about etiquette and politeness verbal diarhea. No offence to Buckingham Palace, just an example, to clarify a point. I used to have polite skills; I had a fuck load of fake friends and hated the fuck out of myself for my cowardice two faced hypocrisy. Now I am more honest, and lots of people hate me, but I am okay with myself, what you see is what you get, I don’t have to waste a whole bunch of energy impressing assholes. Some people ‘get sexual liberation orgasms’ on being hypocrites – Duane ‘Dewey’ Clarridge at 55:30: CIA: America’s Secret Warriors – they actually enjoy it; that’s okay, if it works for them, I am happy for them. I prefer the buck stops here honesty relating communication style. I consider loyalty to a dumbfuck country or tribe or race or religion; that has fuck all concern about sustainable survival of the planet dumber than dumbfuck. Renounced my SA citizenship on 19 April 2002; nobody in the SA government even gave a fuck. For me, its Earth First!.

For example: Pakistani secular Muslim Arif Hasan Akhudzada has in the past had no problem expressing himself in very strong emotional language to my face. Put differently he was capable of being emotionally naked, liberating his emotions on a particular issue.

Put simply: Different groups who have totally different emotional / sexual liberation cultural values, but who all abide by procreation and consumption scientific sexual liberation values, could live in peace, keeping their cultural values within their tribes, as detailed in at eop-v-wip-ism.tygae.org.za

Probably – in your perspective – unrelated to your original questions, but partially relevant to the issue of whether or when military will finally make up their minds whether they want an EoP or WiP future. Put differently: Should military opt for being emotionally honest with civilians obstructing the implementation of EoP SciCult Law; or just shoot them all; and then implement EoP SciCult Law?

As I said, my patience is wearing thin.

Published at EoP v Belarus Emb in RSA: 16 Jul: Re: Belarus Embassy Request for Information telephone call.

Respectfully [EoP Culture Honest In Your Face = Respect definition],

Lara Johnson, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk

.

Copies Sent to:

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@webmail.co.za>
Date: 2018-07-17 13:45
Subject: PEaton DTrump VPutin: Re: Belarus Embassy Request for Information telephone call.
To: Maj Gen Paul Eaton via Vet Voice Foundation <info@vetvoicefoundation.com>, Vote Vets <info@votevets.org>
Cc: “Donald Trump via Counsel: Rudolph Giuliani via Giuliani Partners” <info@giulianipartners.com>, JoAnn Zafonte <JoAnn.Zafonte@giulianipartners.com>, “Kremlin: President Vladimir Putin via Kremlin Press Office” <press_office@prpress.gov.ru>
* Date: 2018-07-17 15:54
Subject: ACamerota, AScaramucci: Belarus Embassy Req for Info tel call: RE: IAEA Draft: EoP Denuke Definition
To: “CNN: Alisyn Camerota” <alisyn.camerota@turner.com>, Anthony Scaramucci via SkyBridge Capital <international@skybridgecapital.com>, Press <skybridge@edelman.com>

Paul Eaton, Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin:
TO: Maj Gen Paul Eaton via Vet Voice Foundation (info@vetvoicefoundation.com); Vote Vets (info@votevets.org)
CC: Donald Trump via Counsel: Rudolph Giuliani via Giuliani Partners (info@giulianipartners.com); JoAnn Zafonte (JoAnn.Zafonte@giulianipartners.com); Kremlin: President Vladimir Putin via Kremlin Press Office (press_office@prpress.gov.ru)
Re: Raw Story: Retired general unleashes on Trump as ‘unfit to command our troops’ in wake of Putin presser.
Published at: EoP Leg Sub: 16 Jul: Re: Belarus Embassy Request for Information telephone call.

Alisyn Camerota, Anthony Scaramucci:
CNN: Alisyn Camerota (alisyn.camerota@turner.com)
Anthony Scaramucci via SkyBridge Capital (international@skybridgecapital.com); Press (skybridge@edelman.com)
Re: CNN: Anthony Scaramucci: Loyalty to Trump requires truth-telling.
Published at: EoP Leg Sub: 16 Jul: Re: Belarus Embassy Request for Information telephone call.

.