* Michael Portillo, Jeremy Corbyn, Labour Friends of Palestine, Shazia Awan-Scully, Shoot from the Hip Media, Shazia Bashir, Peterborough Conservatives, Laura Perrins, Conservative Woman, BBC Newsnight, Evan Davis, Boris Johnson, Jacob Rees Mogg, David Davis, Dominic Raab, Daniel Hannan, Nigel Farage, Annabelle Fuller, UKIP, Parliament Street, Patrick Sullivan, Frazier Browne Mayer, John Browne, Economic Voice, Jeff Taylor, Richard Henley Davis, Leave.EU, Arron Banks, Brexit Central, Gina Miller, Jacqueline Parker, True and Fair Foundation, AC Grayling, New College of Humanities, Marie Anne Martin, Lord Stuart Rose, Ocado, Alena Ivanova, Momentum, Carolyn Fairburn, Confederation of British Industry, E4E:Environmentalists for Europe, Stanley Johnson, Channel 4.
* 08 Aug: EoP Re: Boris Miller & Gina Johnson Judea Exit Capitalism Front Burqa Letter.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v Michael Portillo, EoP v UK Parl, EoP v EU Parliament / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMUK | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk <firstname.lastname@example.org>
* Date: 2018-08-08 21:41
Subject: EoP Re: Boris Miller & Gina Johnson Judea Exit Capitalism Front Burqa Letter.
To: Michael Portillo <email@example.com>, Jeremy Corbyn <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Labour Friends of Palestine <email@example.com>, Shazia Bashir via Peterborough Conservatives <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Laura Perrins via Conservative Woman <email@example.com>, BBC Newsnight <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Boris Johnson <email@example.com>, Dominic Raab <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Gina Miller <email@example.com>, Lord Stuart Rose via Ocado <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “E4E:Environmentalists for Europe: Stanley Johnson” <email@example.com>, Channel 4 <firstname.lastname@example.org>
* Date: 2018-08-08 22:08
Subject: Brexit & Remainers: EoP Re: Boris Miller & Gina Johnson Judea Exit Capitalism Front Burqa Letter.
Jacob Rees Mogg <email@example.com>, David Davis <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Daniel Hannan <email@example.com>, Nigel Farage <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Annabelle Fuller <email@example.com>, UKIP <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Parliament Street: Patrick Sullivan” <email@example.com>, “Frazier Browne Mayer: John Browne” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Economic Voice: Jeff Taylor” <email@example.com>, Richard Henley Davis <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Leave.EU: Arron Banks” <email@example.com>, Brexit Central <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Jacqueline Parker <email@example.com>, True and Fair Foundation <firstname.lastname@example.org>, AC Grayling via New College of Humanities <email@example.com>, Marie Anne Martin <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Alena Ivanova via Momentum <email@example.com>, Groups <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Carolyn Fairburn via Confederation of British Industry <email@example.com>, Press Office <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Commercial <email@example.com>
Cc: “Newsnight: Scotland” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Evan Davis <email@example.com>
TO: Michael Portillo, Shazia Scully, Shazia Bashir, Laura Perrins:
TO: Boris Johnson & Brexiteers:
TO: Gina Miller, Stanley Johnson & Remainers:
Re: BBC Newsnight: ‘Drop Boris Johnson over burka row,’ says Tory peer; Telegraph: Denmark has got it wrong. Yes, the burka is oppressive and ridiculous – but that’s still no reason to ban it; Channel 4: Gina Miller on a post-Brexit world, death threats and rethinking capitalism; News Revue: Channel 4: Jon Snow: Population Explosion causes Poverty Crisis; Nightline: CIA & Pentagon on Overpopulation & Resource Wars.
Michael Portillo et al:
EoP Re: Boris Miller & Gina Johnson Judea Exit Capitalism Front Burqa Letter.
EoP MILED Clerk multi-tasking – on behalf of Dalio Pittard [daliopittard.tygae.org.za] and EoP Applicants [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za] whose preferences are available at Ego/Eco Literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] – EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] negotiations correspondence; to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law; to enable responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] orderly and humane prisoner release [prisoner-pardon.tygae.org.za] land reform [eop-landreform.tygae.org.za] denuclearization [eop-denuke-defn.tygae.org.za] de-industrialization and depopulation [eop-v-wip-deindpopn.tygae.org.za].
If – I Repeat IF – Boris Johnson’s burqa letterbox & Gina Millers post Brexit rethinking capitalism statements were (a) partially manipulated by military individuals using psychotronic technology; and/or (b) consciously stated by Boris Johnson; as part of EoP TRC Negotiations; herewith EoP MILED Clerk observations subject to EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] objective reality and Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Information Quality Operations [eop-rh-iqo.tygae.org.za] subjective reality caveats.
WiP Dysfunctional Father-Son Mother-Daughter Parenting Relationships:
I want to be a woman. From now on I want you all to call me Loretta. What? Its my right as a man. Well why do you want to be Loretta Stan? I want to have babies. You wanna have babies. Its every man’s right to have babies if he wants them. But you can’t have babies. Don’t you oppress me. I’m not oppressing you Stan, you don’t have a womb. Where is the foetus going to gestate, you gonna keep it in a box. [Tears] Here I’ve got an idea. Suppose you agree that he can’t actually have babies, not having a womb, which is nobody’s fault, not even the Romans, but that he can have the right to have babies. Good idea Judith. We shall fight the oppressors for your right to have babies brother/sister. Sorry. Whats the point? What? Whats the point of fighting for his right to have babies if he can’t have babies. It is symbolic of our struggle against oppression. Its symbolic of his struggle against reality. ……… Le Carre’s Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy series deals with the socio-cultural dysfunctional consequences of Father Son [aka masculine insecurity / fatherhood parenting] relationships. In one discussion between Jim Prideaux and George Smiley; Prideaux is describing the Soviet psychological torture processes; and how initially he simply relied on plausible deniable stories as answers to the interrogators questions. Finally he didn’t psychologically break or crack, he says he just ran out of stories; and started to dig down into the stuff buried deep inside. …. Ever feel like you married / work for the Ayatolla? Ever consider why some animals eat their young? Are the walls the only things that listen? I think sex is like supermarkets, lots of pushing and shoving and you still come up with very little at the end. Thats right Milandra, I’m going to Greece for the sex, sex for breakfast, sex for dinner, sex for tea; and sex for supper. Sounds like a marvellous diet love? Its called the F Plan. We were sitting there in the front room, I said ‘Joe have you ever heard of the clitorus’. He didn’t even look up from his paper. Yeah he said, but it doesn’t go as well as the Ford Escort. — Life of Brian: The People’s Front of Judea; John Le Carre; Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy – The Secret Centre; Shirley Valentine: Married Ayatollah?; Clitorus Ford Escort.
» IG: 17-07-05_postcoldwar-eoptrcpeace-lecarrettss; EoP Leg Sub: 19 Jul: EoP Re: NY Times: Would it, or Wouldn’t it be; RRReturn of Canal Message Fatherhood; 22 Jul: Urinetown EoP or WiP Vote Q: Toilet Democracy can not survive overpopulation.
Control — or the claim of control — over the means of reproduction has been even more fundamental to history than has control of the means of production: Women can do all the important things that men can (although, because of physical differences, in some areas not as well, on average), but there are some essential things that women can do that men cannot: bear and give birth to children and nourish them from their bodies. Because of this relative incapacity, many men suffer, largely subconsciously, from what might be termed “womb envy” and “breast envy,” or even the “non-menstrual syndrome.” To compensate for the things that they cannot do, men tell women that they may not do other things. Which activities women are excluded from varies from one culture to another, but some form of the procedure can be found in all societies. …. In Eve’s Seed: Masculine Insecurity, Metaphor, and the Shaping of History, and Eve’s Seed: Biology, the Sexes and the Course of History, Robert McElvaine described it thus: “Karl Marx had it wrong. Class has, to be sure, been a major factor in history; but class itself is a derivative concept that is based on the ultimate causative power in history: sex. Marx‘s famous formulation must be revised: The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of struggles based on the division of our species into two sexes, jealousies emanating from this division, exaggerations of the differences between the sexes, misunderstandings about sexual reproductive power, and metaphors derived from sex. Together, these closely related matters constitute the most important, but largely neglected, set of motive forces in human history. Control — or the claim of control — over the means of reproduction has been even more fundamental to history than has control of the means of production…– SQSwans: Robert McElvaine: Eve’s Seed: History and ‘Control of Reproduction’ Religion of Masculine Insecurity.
Got an EoP MEGA Responsible Freedom Father/Motherhood Definition?:
If or when I meet a man who is willing to provide me with his legal definition for fatherhood; and I legally consent to his legal definition for fatherhood, I shall be happy to consent to refrain from the use of family planning contraception methods and he can legally be provided ‘property rights’ over my womb and/or any fetus conceived in such womb. A few years ago when a man I was dating asked me if I wanted to have his child: I responded: Lets go to the police station where you can stick a Russian Roulette gun to your head and ask me that dumbfuck question again before you pull the trigger. If you’re still alive after having pulled the trigger, we can see how interested you are in further responsible freedom parenting discussion. He was not interested in any further discussion of the issue such as: Do you want to be a responsible freedom father or a duhmockery slave sperm donor? If you want to be a father: we can discuss what your definition of fatherhood is; and see if we have the same fatherhood, motherhood, parenting rules; how we are going to cooperate to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] prior to conceiving any children; or if there are insufficient – responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] and EoP Policy Statement [eop-policy-stmnt.tygae.org.za] – co-operators [eop-cooperator.tygae.org.za], our mutual assisted suicide plans; to fuck off to another planet where there may be enough people interested in living responsible freedom lives. If your ‘fatherhood’ definition includes fucking off whenever confronted with any WiP law resource conflict issue that makes your fucking ego upset; then fuck off and find some future BDSM MeToo tits and ass career slut with a similar fuck honour ‘motherhood’ definition to your fuck honour ‘fatherhood’ definition.
» EoP Leg Sub: 27 May: FBI Gary Lorin: EoP RE: FBI Vault: Lolita pussy/penis cannon fodder Express Informant; 04 Jul: Koko CheckMate: Got EoP ironclad facts or WiP ID politics Control Card Outposts in your Head?
Alastair Crooke: Ostpolitik and Unfinished Business of WWII & Cold War:
“The [Middle East] region always appreciates states that have a clear direction in which they want to go. Whether they like the direction or not they appreciate states that are not uncertain, but know where they want to go, have a clear and consistent goal, and are tough about it. Thats the Middle East. .. and the other is a clear vision and understanding by Russia as to what you want, and where Russia is going. And if you compare that to the American and Western coalition, people are not sure who they are supporting [in the Middle East] any longer. ….. The Middle East don’t want outside interference; until when they have problems; then they are begging outside powers for help; but local actors refuse to accept the help advised. … The Middle East is in deep crisis of defining islam in contemporary world. ….. I think also its important because there is a much longer term game in play for Russia, which is the future of Europe. And the future of Europe is now very much uncertain and in the balance. And we may see, partly exacerbated by the refugee crisis, but because of internal dynamics, that Europe has to reinvent itself, because it won’t stay as it is. And it also needs to reinvent itself as an identity. What does it mean to be European today. I mean what are European values? I mean no-one can really answer these questions. Europe was built on the false basis of the promise of prosperity for all. There has not been prosperity for all, for some years now, since 2008, and in fact its getting much worse no in many parts of Europe. So what do we stand for? Where do we stand? And into that comes the question of the role of NATO, as the representative of the carryon of American occupation of Europe, but also as a means of Euopean foreign policy, is NATO foreign policy. Its not independent of it. And a strong sense in many of the European countries that actually we have to deal with the unfinished business of the second world war. The outcome of the Second World War was not won on the beaches of Normandy but was won in Stalingrad. A huge loss of life. That was the fundamental defeat of Germany. At the end of that war, Germany understood the need to come to terms with its situation, and asked France to gulleverize it, if you will, but it tipped the whole of the European balance towards the Atlantic, which was quite suitable for the Americans at that point. But the Berlin Wall meant that there was no reconciliation with Russia. The wall came down and then it was stopped. There was no sense of the psychological need, if you like to get passed that period. And after that NATO has pushed, pushed, pushed the walls closer and closer to Russia’s frontiers, the missiles and tanks upto its borders. Europe, if it is to survive needs to address this fundamental question about ostpolitik; and this was the point that was made very clearly earlier. What was it that Germany did not say No, to Clinton when he proposed moving the frontiers of NATO further and further upto Russia? Its the real issue, also partly because the German leadership of Europe is now quite vulnerable. Mrs Merkel is still Chancellor, but its not clear that she will survive politically. And then what do we have? At the moment we have a German Union, I mean we have to be frank, Germany is the hegemon of the European Union; and many states are uncomfortable about that. I think ultimately Europe must look to ultimately going back to more of a concert of Europe, if its going to find any independence and autonomy. But before that we are going to go through a crisis, because the refugee crisis is going to move us to more right wing populist. The states are fighting each other, but out of this I think will come some sense of how do we undo the .. how do we find a way to get past the legacy of the second world war. I think that is something that we see that President Putin very carefully understands in the way he works with Europe. I mean given the sorts of snubs and insults that come from Europe, its clear that he is working to an agenda of understanding, that when you look at most of these areas in Europe you find that there are large elements of opinon that favour closer relations with Russia. ….. I think this will become an important point.” – Valdai Club: Alistair Crooke: Assad Will Win in a Fair Election.
» IG: 17-07-05_postcoldwar-eoptrcpeace-alistaircrooke; 03 Jul: Alwaleed bin Talal: Draft: Giving Pledge Consent to EoP Land Reform Denuclearization.
EoP Scientific v WiP Cultural Sexual Liberation:
The RAF / Baader Meinhof used to say that the sexual liberation is part of the anti-imperialist struggle.
Sexual liberation is part of anti-imperialism; but I would probably disagree with the RAF’s definition of sexual liberation, if my interpretation of their concept of sexual liberation is accurate.
Scientific sexual liberation – scientific: breeding and consuming below ecological carrying capacity limits – is part of the anti-imperialist struggle.
Cultural sexual liberation – cultural: naturalist naked, tits and ass slut naked, naturalist naked under a burqa, tits and ass slut naked under a burqa, and so on sexual liberation values, are cultural – are not part of the objective anti-imperialist struggle, but they could be subjectively part of some women’s inner-ego dictator anti-imperialist struggle.
If or when a woman who has the freedom to choose to be naturalist naked woman considers herself ‘sexually suppressed’ then she can adopt a different ‘tits and ass slut naked’ or ‘burqa naturalist’ or ‘tits and ass slut under a burqa’ or whatever cultural value she subjectively considers could be more sexually liberated; to ascertain whether she feels more liberated or not. She can experiment with them all, and then choose which one suits her best.
She can do so in an EoP SciCultLaw [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] social contract society; but not in a WiP social contract society; where most women are considered to be nothing more than the factory brood sows, or trophy wives; for fuck honour men addicted to breeding fuck honour unwanted and hated children; or strutting around the world stage. Men on the other hand are trapped in WiP social contract being women’s security cheap labour, or sperm donors or walking wallets.
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 Jul: Belarus Embassy Request for Info tel call: RE: IAEA Draft: EoP Denuke Definition.
Strong Ego Love Sincerity / Honesty v Fragile Ego Love Fake / Flattery:
ESQ: Can we play it out? I’ll be my wife, Julie, and you be me. So does my ass look fat in this dress? BB: Yes, you look like a goddamn whale. ESQ: Well, I’d say, That’s rude; you don’t need to put it like that. BB: Rude? What in the fuck is rude? Is it rude or not rude that you ask me to bullshit about you when you’re trying to convince yourself that you don’t look fat? You’re more worried about it than I am in the first place. ESQ: Well, I don’t think it’s bullshit. BB: It’s bullshit! I think the question is bullshit. ESQ: The question is, I want to look good to my friends, I want people to think I’m attractive. So I want to wear a dress that’s flattering, so what’s wrong with asking which dress is more flattering to my ass? BB: Well, if you follow those dumbass fucking premises, there’s nothing wrong with it. The problem is with the dumbass premises. Of course you want people to think you look good. But looking good…I’d whole lot rather be with a goddamn gorilla that was capable of love than someone who’s hotter than hell. I’ve slept with a lot of women who looked like Playboy playmates, and they weren’t as much fun as women that weren’t as attractive but really liked to fuck and really loved me. – Esquire: The Most Honest Conversation in the World.
» EoP Leg Sub: 27 May: FBI Gary Lorin: EoP RE: FBI Vault: Lolita pussy/penis cannon fodder Express Informant.
Flattery: The First Principle of Occult Mind Control
Perhaps more important, there is one key principle of the psychology of mass mind control missing from the old model of authority embodied by the early Fathers of the Christian Church: they did not flatter and they did not come in disguise. The core of orthodox Christianity’s belief system was antioccult to the marrow: it was the bad news about human nature.
Since we choose to refuse to genuinely heal the rift between the two sides of our mentality by the tough means of repudiating our lying public persona and taking action on the understanding of our true self, we relinquish autonomy to those who make it appear that they can heal us at no great cost or trouble on our part. Never mind that “They” are also the ones who implanted the rift in the first place. The point is “We” have little or no power. We cannot act. We cannot invent. We cannot cure. We must wait and see what happens. We must see what They make happen.
The final coffin in the nail of our free will is the fact that we ourselves know in our heart of hearts that the above is false. That it is We the People who have the power and the responsibility and that we could crush Them tomorrow if we chose to. They are only an illusion, every bit as ephemeral as the patter of a carnival sideshow bunco artist beckoning to us from the other side of the hootchie-kootchie tent.
But if we overthrew them tomorrow we would have to write our own scripts. We would have to heal ourselves. We would have to admit the colossal waste and loss and destruction of the past years which our laziness and folly have made possible. We would have to experience the pain of being alive and responsible. We would have to start acting like men and women instead of as slaves and weaklings.
The Hermetic Academy is confident, and not without reason, that we will offer no substantial, meaningful resistance to their imperium. Why?
The foster mothers of the human race, at least in the West, are cows. Perhaps we’ve imbibed so much of their fluid that we have become cows, terrified of freedom and its responsibilities. Epistemologist Charles Fort once remarked, “I think we’re farmed.”
According to the secret tradition of the Hermetic Academy, the “tree” of the Knowledge of Good and Evil in the Garden of Eden was a psychedelic mushroom, stropharia cubensis.* These mushrooms grow only in cow dung.
Why then does he revere them? Because they flatter him. This is the first secret of mass mind control and can be observed as the foundation stone of virtually every false religion, party, cult, philosophy, system and training. How can modern man free himself when he is told that he is already a demi-god, that the problem lies only in finding a pure enough economic or political system worthy of his high-minded brilliance?
If we look closely we will see that this mind control principle is so basic and simple it is almost stupidly so, to the point that we marvel that anyone would be seduced by it. But it is all a matter of attention, as we saw in the parable of the mountebank and the clown. Arrogant hypno-patsies have been told by their masters that they are “Demi-gods” and demi-gods are never deceived or distracted. They’re too smart! And by their arrogant self-satisfaction they blind themselves to the simplicity of the device that ensnares them and that is when “the real sales pitch begins.”
What the Alchemical managers have bred over a millennia is a human race of the most wretched stupidity and ignorance unrivaled in thousands of years. These blind slaves are told they are “free” and “highly educated” even as they march behind signs that would cause any medieval peasant to run screaming away from them in panic-stricken terror. The symbols that modern man embraces with the naive trust of an infant would be tantamount to billboards reading, “This way to your death and enslavement,” to the understanding of a traditional peasant of antiquity.
Who is the modern man? The puppet-masters say he is the smartest, most advanced individual to ever strut the planet, the most relatively liberated being in history. But Louis-Ferdinand Celine said it well, “What does the modern public want? It wants to go down on its knees before money and before crap!”
– Michael Hoffman: Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare.
» EoP Leg Sub: 21 Jul: EoP Re: Adi Schlebush: Re: OFS boers wanting to emigrate to Russia
Urinetown: Toilet Democracy can not survive overpopulation: Toward the end of his lecture, Bartlett quotes Isaac Asimov, from an interview with Bill Moyers recorded in 1989. Moyers asked Asimov, “What happens to the idea of the dignity of the human species if this population growth continues at its present rate?” Asimov replied: “It will be completely destroyed. I like to use what I call my bathroom metaphor: if two people live in an apartment and there are two bathrooms, then both have freedom of the bathroom. You can go to the bathroom anytime you want to stay as long as you want for whatever you need. And everyone believes in freedom of the bathroom; it should be right there in the Constitution. But if you have twenty people in the apartment and two bathrooms, no matter how much every person believes in freedom of the bathroom, there is no such thing. You have to set up times for each person, you have to bang on the door, Aren’t you through yet? and so on. In the same way, democracy cannot survive overpopulation. Human dignity cannot survive [overpopulation]. Convenience and decency cannot survive [overpopulation]. As you put more and more people onto the world, the value of life not only declines, it disappears. It doesn’t matter if someone dies, the more people there are, the less one person matters.” Urinetown, indeed. – Resilience/Energy Bulletin: Population, Resources and Human Idealism [SQ Copy].
» EoP Leg Sub: 22 Jul: Urinetown EoP or WiP Vote Q: Toilet Democracy can not survive overpopulation.
Boris Johnson: Lets have an adult conversation with American friends about causes of resource conflict: Boris Johnson has banned himself from using the phrase “special relationship” to describe Britain’s longstanding links with the United States: it sounds, he says, “a bit needy”…… It is a tragic measure of how far the world has changed – and the infinite capacity of modern man for taking offence – that there are no two subjects that can get you more swiftly into political trouble than motherhood and apple pie. The last time I tentatively suggested that there was something to be said in favour of apple pie, I caused a frenzy of hatred in the healthy-eating lobby. It reached such a pitch that journalists were actually pelting me with pies, and demanding a retraction, and an apology, and a formal denunciation of the role of apple pie in causing obesity. As for motherhood – the fertility of the human race – we are getting to the point where you simply can’t discuss it, and we are thereby refusing to say anything sensible about the biggest single challenge facing the Earth; and no, whatever it may now be conventional to say, that single biggest challenge is not global warming. That is a secondary challenge. The primary challenge facing our species is the reproduction of our species itself. Depending on how fast you read, the population of the planet is growing with every word that skitters beneath your eyeball. There are more than 211,000 people being added every day, and a population the size of Germany every year. As someone who has now been travelling around the world for decades, I see this change, and I feel it. You can smell it in the traffic jams of the Middle East. You can see it as you fly over Africa at night, and you see mile after mile of fires burning red in the dark, as the scrub is removed to make way for human beings. You can see it in the satellite pictures of nocturnal Europe, with the whole place lit up like a fairground. You can see it in the crazy dentition of the Shanghai skyline, where new skyscrapers are going up round the clock. You can see it as you fly over Mexico City, a vast checkerboard of smog-bound, low-rise dwellings stretching from one horizon to the other; and when you look down on what we are doing to the planet, you have a horrifying vision of habitations multiplying and replicating like bacilli in a Petri dish. The world’s population is now 6.7 billion, roughly double what it was when I was born. If I live to be in my mid-eighties, then it will have trebled in my lifetime. The UN last year revised its forecasts upwards, predicting that there will be 9.2 billion people by 2050, and I simply cannot understand why no one discusses this impending calamity, and why no world statesmen have the guts to treat the issue with the seriousness it deserves. How the hell can we witter on about tackling global warming, and reducing consumption, when we are continuing to add so relentlessly to the number of consumers? The answer is politics, and political cowardice. There was a time, in the 1960s and 1970s, when people such as my father, Stanley, were becoming interested in demography, and the UN would hold giant conferences on the subject, and it was perfectly respectable to talk about saving the planet by reducing the growth in the number of human beings. But over the years, the argument changed, and certain words became taboo, and certain concepts became forbidden, and we have reached the stage where the very discussion of overall human fertility – global motherhood – has become more or less banned. We seem to have given up on population control, and all sorts of explanations are offered for the surrender. Some say Indira Gandhi gave it all a bad name, by her demented plan to sterilise Indian men with the lure of a transistor radio. Some attribute our complacency to the Green Revolution, which seemed to prove Malthus wrong. It became the received wisdom that the world’s population could rise to umpteen billions, as mankind learnt to make several ears of corn grow where one had grown before. And then, in recent years, the idea of global population control has been more or less stifled by a pincer movement from the Right and the Left. American Right-wingers disapprove of anything that sounds like birth control, and so George W. Bush withholds the tiny contribution America makes to the UN Fund for Population Activities, regardless of the impact on the health of women in developing countries. As for the Left, they dislike suggestions of population control because they seem to smack of colonialism and imperialism and telling the Third World what to do; and so we have reached the absurd position in which humanity bleats about the destruction of the environment, and yet there is not a peep in any communiqué from any summit of the EU, G8 or UN about the population growth that is causing that destruction. The debate is surely now unavoidable. Look at food prices, driven ever higher by population growth in India and China. Look at the insatiable Chinese desire for meat, which has pushed the cost of feed so high that Vladimir Putin has been obliged to institute price controls in the doomed fashion of Diocletian or Edward Heath. Even in Britain, chicken farmers are finding that the cost of chickenfeed is no longer exactly chickenfeed, and, though the food crisis may once again be solved by the wit of man, the damage to the environment may be irreversible. It is time we had a grown-up discussion about the optimum quantity of human beings in this country and on this planet. Do we want the south-east of Britain, already the most densely populated major country in Europe, to resemble a giant suburbia? This is not, repeat not, an argument about immigration per se, since in a sense it does not matter where people come from, and with their skill and their industry, immigrants add hugely to the economy. This is a straightforward question of population, and the eventual size of the human race. All the evidence shows that we can help reduce population growth, and world poverty, by promoting literacy and female emancipation and access to birth control. Isn’t it time politicians stopped being so timid, and started talking about the real number one issue? – The Guardian: Boris Johnson: ‘Let us have a grown-up conversation with our American friends’; Telegraph: Global over-population is the real issue; Church and State: Boris Johnson: Global overpopulation is the real issue [SQ Copy]; Population Elephant: Best Ten Articles about Overpopulation.
» EoP Leg Sub: 22 Jul: Urinetown EoP or WiP Vote Q: Toilet Democracy can not survive overpopulation.
Win Win or Lose Lose:
The uniqueness of my conflict with the Israelis is that it cannot be played as a zero sum game. It’s two winners or two losers, and two losers we have been — dictation, walls, settlements, occupation, bigotry, racism. And winning is only through the path of peace and negotiation. That’s what I’m offering them. – Saeb Erekat; Palestinian Negotiator; PBS Frontline: Kate Seelye Erekat Interview. Australian Perspective: Netanyahu at War.
» EoP Leg Sub: 01 Jan: EoP Re: Anti-Capitalist Right, Our Russian Truth, Philosophers for Trump, EO 13818, IGD Class War. 10 Jan: Trump & Oprah Masonic WiPenis Swamp Time is Up?: Ready for Responsible Freedom discussion with your voters?.
Sunni & Shia Imam’s: Under certain conditions Family Planning Not only Permissible, but should be Made Compulsory
“Smallness of a family (qillat al’ayal) is a facility (yusur) and its largeness (Kathrat) results in faqr (indigence, poverty). … the best of people (Khayar al-nas) is one who has less burden of children on his back (Khafif al-zahr min al-ayal) – Imam Ghazzali, a Muslim theologian, philosopher and sufi of great eminence.
Birth control is permissible – Imam Abu Hanifa, Imam Malik, Imam Ibn Hanbal, Imam Shafi’i, Imam Ghazzali, Small family is a bliss … excess children creates great worries – Imam Abu Hanifa & Imam Ja’afar al-Sadiq Under certain conditions, family planning is not only morally permissible, but should be made compulsory – [paraphrased] Maulana Saeed Ahmad Akbarabadi & Imam Taymiyyah
– Asghar Ali Engineer; The Qur’an, Women and Modern Society: Islam and Family Planning
» IG: 17-08-22_ashgaralieng-islam-famplanning; 17-08-22_danapittard-mlk-fplanning.
Implement [EoP – breed & consume below ecological carrying capacity limits – Intnl Law] Family Planning for [orderly & humane de-population & de-industrialization race, religious & cultural planetary] Revolution!
Deng Xiaoping introduced China’s one child policy in 1978-79, to halt – an average of 6 children per family – population growth. On 25 Sep 1980 an official public letter called on all citizens to adhere to the one child policy. The One Child policy was enacted and managed by the National Population and Family Planning Commission, through incentives, persuasion and coercion. Unofficial figures claim approximately 300-400 million births were prevented between 1978-2015. A 2008 survey reported that 76% of the Chinese public support the law. Less than 10% of Chinese families have taken advantage of the Chinese governments relaxation of the law to a two child policy; citing environmental and economic reasons for their adherence to the one child policy rule.
» IG: 17-08-30_garrettmurtaugh-cnfamplanning.
» 05 Jan: Bilderberg via Peter Thiel: Info Re EoP or WiP Future correspondence to Trump 2016 Oligarchs.
UK-EU EoPExit Referendum
We do need to have the courage to make the change. Michael Portillo’s leadership campaign gave his enemies all the information they could have wanted. He would bring about change all right, but not the change many were willing to stomach. Portillo frightened the horses quite allot, he was quite uncompromising about what he said needed to be done, and he wouldn’t make the little compromises with people to smooth them down. He said this is a big task, we’ve got to do it. I am willing to do it, if you want me to do it; but if you don’t want me to do it, then I don’t need it. I think Portillo did what he did, not because he sought the leadership because he desperately wanted it, but because he recognized his role is the champion of those who do believe in economic realism and social liberalism. – BBC: Portillo on Thatcher: The Lady’s not for Spurning.
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Jun: EoP Draft: Assange: Re: MEGA Database for EoP Land Reform Denuclearization.
In my capacity as heir apparent to the British throne [royal.uk]; I hereby make the following recommendations to UK Prime Minister Theresa May, EU President Claude Juncker and NATO Military Chief: General Petr Pavel; in support of an UK and/or European Union collective EoPExit Referendum.
Summary: EoP Exit Referendum is a vote to provide PM Theresa May and/or President Claude Juncker with a mandate to EoP Exit the WiP international law social contract.
¤ EU Responsible Freedom Confederacy with Self Rule Homelands.
¤ EoP Axis Military Necessity Evacuation.
EU Responsible Freedom Confederacy with Self Rule Homelands:
UK / EU citizens vote by signing their Responsible Freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] Oaths and/or EoP Policy Statements [eop-policy-stmnt.tygae.org.za] to support UK/EU officials to request the International Court of Justice to confirm the legal certainty [eop-legcertenq.tygae.org.za] accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] principles, thereby authorizing the implementation [eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za] of EoP Axis [eop-axis.tygae.org.za] recommended Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law; enabling orderly and humane EoP Land Reform [eop-landreform.tygae.org.za] prisoner release [prisoner-pardon.tygae.org.za] denuclearization [eop-denuke-defn.tygae.org.za] deindustrialization and depopulation [eop-v-wip-deindpopn.tygae.org.za] return to living in harmony with ecological carrying capacity limits.
Those who refuse to sign their responsible freedom Oaths and/or EoP Policy Statements shall be allowed to inform a court as to their reasons for their refusal. In the absence of a scientifically based reasonable reason, they shall be convicted of crimes of aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za], and be allowed to say goodbye to their families, and make their planetary genepool assisted suicide departure plans; within two weeks of sentencing, and/or by a date as decided by the sentencing judge.
EoP Axis Military Necessity Evacuation:
I don’t expect UK and/or EU citizens to vote for this option, but I include it, and think it should be included as a voting option, to provide UK and EU citizens who wish to obstruct voting for EU Responsible freedom Confederacy with Self Rule Homelands option; with contextual information as to the EoP Axis Military Necessity Evacuation Option, Prime Ministers, Generals and Judges [Global Observatory: Climate Change is a global energy food water wars climate refugees security threat; Gen Wes Clark: Climate Change will affect all levels of society; World Future Council: Judge C. G. Weeramantry talks about the World Future Council] shall be required to vote upon, in the absence of orderly and humane implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural Law.
A vote for EoP Axis Military Evacuation [eop-axis-milnec-evac.tygae.org.za] shall provide EoP Axis [eop-axis.tygae.org.za] officials with the authority to militarily evacuate all citizens in all nations, who have not signed their Responsible Freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] Oaths and/or EoP Policy Statements [eop-policy-stmnt.tygae.org.za]; – i.e. give large groups of people a fatal stroke/heart attack using psychotronic technology [Alex Jones: Gov Mind Control Technologies with Dr John Hall; Bibliotecapleyades: Angels Don’t Play this HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology via Earthpulse].
» EoP Leg Sub: 17 Jul: Prince Charles: Draft: UK-EU EoPExit Referendum.
EoP Scientific and Cultural Law Re: * Unlawful violence; * Responsible freedom property ration basic income enabling self sufficiency from partner/employer abuse; * Racial, religious & ideological cultural law lowtech agrarian, pastoral nomads and /or hunter-gatherer self rule homelands aka autarky [self sufficent] autarchy [self rule].
If or when EoP Scientific and Cultural Law is implemented as international law, all Presidents, oligarchs and citizens, will have all their property – above the guaranteed property ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za] for responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] citizens – nationalized. Those who object to signing their responsible freedom oaths, shall be provided an opportunity to go to ego/eco literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] classes to educate themselves about ego/eco literacy; and/or inform a court as to their reasons for their refusal to sign their responsible freedom oath. In the absence of a scientifically based reasonable reason, they shall be convicted of crimes of aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za], and be allowed to make their removal from the planetary genepool assisted suicide departure plans. Subsequent to their honourable or state assisted suicide departure, their property ration depending on its location, shall be available for re-allocation to another citizen, or if close to rural / nature reservation removed from the citizen property ration database and allocated for rewilding nature corridors database.
» EoP Leg Sub: 13 Apr: USAID Dir Mark Green: Q Re: Trump-Pompeo State-USAID Strategic Future Policy [password]; 17 Apr: EoP Info: Re: Ray Anderson ‘corporate plundering will be illegal’ quote in The Corporation.
If you got something to say – for or against – the implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law; say it to EoP MILED Clerk; during the planning phase. – 21 Nov: Stan McChrystal: Re: Combat Consultant: Q&A With Retired General Stanley McChrystal; 20 Dec: Theo Wilson: EoP re: TW: Awakening N*ggaz; WoaW: Conscious Clapback; MD Gandhi’s Pencil.
All EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] Legal Submissions are essentially Truth & Reconciliation [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] submissions; which (a) clearly and simply clarify the – ‘right to breed/consume’ clauses of intnl law – root causes of all racial, religious, etc resource conflict; and (b) provide those guilty – plausibly due to lack of ego or ecological literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] character – of scarcity combatant crimes of aggression contributions to resource conflict; the opportunity to take responsibility for their breeding/consumption transgressions [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; by cooperating [eop-cooperator.tygae.org.za] to implement an EoP New World Order Social Contract that shall require all citizens of all nations, races and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.
More specifically: EoP Applicants [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za] TRC process advocate’s the implementation of an EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] international law social contract that shall (a) require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za]; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; (b) nationalizes all property [eop-sdwipecon.tygae.org.za] and provide all responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za] citizens a property ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za] to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.
Under EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] international law: (a) Scientific law unlawful violence will be procreation and/or consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za]; (b) Cultural law unlawful violence will be violation of fully informed consent. Penalties for negligent and/or intentional engagement in unlawful procreation, consumption or deception violence are documented at Crimes of Aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]. Detailed information is available at EoP Scientific and Cultural Law detailing generally speaking how EoP Scientific and Cultural Law would work when someone is accused of a procreation, consumption or deception crime of aggression.
EoP Scientific and Cultural Law international law will provide a basic income of a property ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za] to all individuals who have signed their responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.
Furthermore: if or when EoP intl law is implemented; EoP Scientific and Cultural Law international law shall allow cultural law territorial self rule [cult-law-self-rule.tygae.org.za], for groups with subjective racial, religious& gender culture-conflict identities; who are willing to adopt responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] procreation, consumption and informed consent lifestyle changes, enabling a higher degree of orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation cooperation through the sharing of sub-cultural lifestyle values; in such self rule communities.
EoP Intnl law non-violent deindustrialization & depopulation cultural revolution:
According to EoP interpretation of Alliance for World Scientists [MG Copy] and Near Term Extinction abrupt climate change scientists [SQ Copy] warnings; there is a very small window of opportunity – 2018, latest 2020 – to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law, to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation, and enable the Genghis Khan reforestation effect to mitigate exponential growth climate change and ecological collapse. Put simply: if EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] is not implemented by latest 2020, we are all – black, white, brown, yellow, rich, poor, old, young, male, female – locking ourselves into our ‘Je Suis . Nazi Juden’ WiP ‘right to breed/consume’ international law Thelma and Louise planetary Auschwitz climate change oven . runaway . train heading for the NTE . cliff without any brakes.
MEGA Responsible Freedom Culture Revolution: Walk Away from Masonic War is Peace isms:
If your ism endorses WiP law [eop-v-wip-law.tygae.org.za]; it’s an imperialist WiP ism [eop-v-wip-ism.tygae.org.za] cultural ideology. .. The excesses of Capitalism, communism and libertarianism are a symptom of Masonic War is Peace – right to breed & consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits – clauses of international law. EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] could be described as the place where responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] capitalism, socialism, libertarianism meet deep green ecology root cause problem solving.
» EoP Leg Sub: 25 May: EoP Re: WSWS Re: Der Spiegel 2 Angela Merkel: take up anti-imperialist struggle; 17 Jun: EoP Re: The only real debt Chaos Monkey technologists have to society.
If you are or were an unconscious member of a Masonic War is Peace culture, who sincerely cares about cooperating [eop-cooperator.tygae.org.za] to implement Make Earth Great Again orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation; you are welcome to withdraw yourself from Masonic War is Peace cultural membership by signing your responsible freedom[responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath. Alternatively you can also delay your withdrawal from Masonic War is Peace cultural membership; until EoP Scientific and Cultural law is implemented as international law; by cooperating [eop-cooperator.tygae.org.za] to – among others – ask your family, friends, church, employers, business to sign their familial or organizational EoP Peace Policy Statements [eop-policy-stmnt.tygae.org.za].
A copy of this correspondence is documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za].
Lara Johnson, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk
Sent per electronic notice:
Michael Portillo, Shazia Scully, Shazia Bashir, Laura Perrins:
Michael Portillo (firstname.lastname@example.org); Jeremy Corbyn (email@example.com); Labour Friends of Palestine (firstname.lastname@example.org); Shazia Awan-Scully via Shoot from the Hip Media Contact Form; Shazia Bashir via Peterborough Conservatives (email@example.com); Laura Perrins via Conservative Woman (firstname.lastname@example.org); BBC Newsnight (email@example.com); Scotland (firstname.lastname@example.org); Evan Davis (email@example.com)
Boris Johnson & Brexiteers:
Boris Johnson (firstname.lastname@example.org); Jacob Rees Mogg (email@example.com); David Davis (firstname.lastname@example.org); Dominic Raab (email@example.com); Daniel Hannan (firstname.lastname@example.org); Nigel Farage (email@example.com); Annabelle Fuller (firstname.lastname@example.org); UKIP (email@example.com); Parliament Street: Patrick Sullivan (firstname.lastname@example.org); Frazier Browne Mayer: John Browne (email@example.com); Economic Voice: Jeff Taylor (firstname.lastname@example.org); Richard Henley Davis (email@example.com); Leave.EU: Arron Banks (firstname.lastname@example.org); Brexit Central (email@example.com)
Gina Miller, Stanley Johnson & Remainers:
Gina Miller (firstname.lastname@example.org); Jacqueline Parker (email@example.com); True and Fair Foundation (firstname.lastname@example.org); AC Grayling via New College of Humanities (email@example.com); Marie Anne Martin (firstname.lastname@example.org); Lord Stuart Rose via Ocado (email@example.com); Alena Ivanova via Momentum (firstname.lastname@example.org); Groups (email@example.com); Carolyn Fairburn via Confederation of British Industry (firstname.lastname@example.org); Press Office (email@example.com); Commercial (firstname.lastname@example.org); E4E:Environmentalists for Europe: Stanley Johnson (email@example.com); Channel 4 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Notice Sent via Contact Form:
Sent: 08 Aug 2018: 20:15 hrs: Shazia Awan-Scully via Shoot from the Hip Media Contact Form
EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] negotiations correspondence – on behalf of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za] – to implement [eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za] EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law; sent 08 Aug 2018 – TO: Shazia Awan-Scully via Shoot from the Hip Media et al – is published at EoP Leg Sub: 08 Aug: EoP Re: Boris Miller & Gina Johnson Judea Exit Capitalism Front Burqa Letter.