10 Nov: EoP Re: SCOTUS: Juliana v Brown & SWIFT & US Treasury Ftprint GWOT Metrics

* US Treasury, Steve Mnuchin, US Mint, RU Treasury, Roman Artyukhin, Swift, CyberFT, SPFS, Wild Earth Advocates, Julia Olson, Phil Gregory, Daniel Galpern, Andrea Rodgers, Crag Law Ctr, Chris Winter, Courtney Johnson, Our Children’s Trust, Blue River Law, Elisabeth Holmes, Tamara Rose, Xiuhtezcatl Martinez, Russell Mendell, Mary Giardino, Dana Pauzauskie, American Petroleum Inst, Natl Assoc of Manufacturers, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, Frank Volpe, Mark Hopson, Benjamin Tannen, Marie Eckert, Suzanne La Campagne, Kate Brown, Inge D Wells, Paul Smith, DoJ: Env & Nat Res, Sean Duffy, Frank Singer, Marissa Piropato, Robert Lundman, Peter Dykema, Eric Grant, Andrew Mergen, Clare Boronow, DoJ: SupremeCtBriefs, Noel Francisco, US Supreme Court Judges, 9th Circuit Court, Judge Sidney Thomas, Clerk of Court, Molly Dwyer, ABA American Bar Assoc, ABA Judicial Division, Amanda Banninga, Jason Brent, Mathis Wackernagel, William Rees, Post Carbon Institute, Alliance for World Scientists, Scientists Warning, Paul Murtaugh, ICJ: Intnl Court of Justice, Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf, Xue Hanqin, Antonio Oposa, Paulo Burro, Luis Moreno Ocampo, Permanent Court of Arbitration, Dirk Pulkowski, Vladimir Putin, Kremlin Press Office, Anatoly Antonov, Embassy of Russian Federation in Washington DC, Stan McChrystal, Ray Dalio, Bridgewater Corporate Counsel, Connecticut Attorney General, George Jepsen, Dana Pittard, Frank Serpico, Steven Seagal.
* 10 Nov: EoP Re: SCOTUS: Juliana v Brown & SWIFT & US Treasury Ftprint GWOT Metrics
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub / EoP ADR: Chernaik v Brown, EoP Cop21, EoP US DoJ, EoP SCOTUS, EoP v Jason Brent, EoP v Alliance for World Scientists, EoP ICJ, EoP v PCA, EoP v Ray Dalio, EoP v TGP Oligarchs, EoP v Steven Seagal, Dalio Pittard MEGA / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Applicants | EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA: Cabinet, EoP NTE GMRU| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: EoP Axis: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za>
* Date: 2018-11-10 12:57
Subject: EoP Re: SCOTUS: Juliana v Brown & SWIFT & US Treasury Ftprint GWOT Metrics
To: US Treasury Sec Steve Mnuchin via US Mint <inquiries@usmint.treas.gov>, Paulette Mobley <Pauletta.Mobley@usmint.treas.gov>, IG <ThompsonR@oig.treas.gov>, Press <press@treasury.gov>, Devin O’Malley <Devin.O’Malley@treasury.gov>, Sean Rushton <Sean.Rushton@treasury.gov>, Terrorism and Financial Intelligence <Seth.Unger@Treasury.gov>, “RU Treasury: Roman Artyukhin” <ovs@roskazna.ru>, Media <smi@roskazna.ru>, Swift <info@swift.com>, Policy Managing Authority <swift-pma@swift.com>, Moscow <moscow.office.generic@swift.com>, Institute <Institute@swift.com>, “Press: Sophia Lyscom” <Sophia.Lyscom@SWIFT.com>, Jean-Marc Gustin <jean-marc.gustin@swift.com>, Andre Goyens <andre.goyens@swift.com>
Cc: Jason Brent <jbrent6179@aol.com>, “Dr. Mathis Wackernagel” <mathis@footprintnetwork.org>, William Rees <wrees@mail.ubc.ca>, Post Carbon Institute <info@postcarbon.org>, Alliance for World Scientists <scientistswarning@oregonstate.edu>, Scientists Warning <Contact@ScientistsWarning.org>, Paul Murtaugh <murtaugp@science.oregonstate.edu>, “ICJ: Intnl Court of Justice” <information@icj-cij.org>, Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf <A.Yusuf@icj-cij.org>, Xue Hanqin <h.xue@icj-cij.org>, Antonio Oposa <tonyoposa1024@gmail.com>, Paulo Burro <pacburro@gmail.com>, Luis Moreno Ocampo <lmoreno-ocampo@getnicklaw.com>, “Permanent Court of Arbitration: Bureau” <bureau@pca-cpa.org>, Dirk Pulkowski <dpulkowski@pca-cpa.org>, President Vladimir Putin via Kremlin Press Office <press_office@prpress.gov.ru>, “Amb Anatoly Antonov: Embassy of Russian Federation in Washington DC: Press office” <RusPressUSA@mid.ru>, Stan McChrystal <stan@mcchrystalgroup.com>, “Bridge Water Associates: Ray Dalio” <dalio@bwater.com>, Bridgewater Corporate Counsel <Corporate_Counsel@bwater.com>, “Connecticut Attorney General: George Jepsen” <attorney.general@ct.gov>, Maj Gen Dana Pittard <dana.j.pittard.mil@mail.mil>, Frank Serpico <serpicofrancesco@aol.com>, Steven Seagal <stevenseagalofficial@hotmail.com>
* Date: 2018-11-10 13:02
Subject: EoP Re: SCOTUS: Juliana v Brown & SWIFT & US Treasury Ftprint GWOT Metrics
To: “Wild Earth Advocates: Julia Olson” <juliaaolson@gmail.com>, Phil Gregory <pgregory@gregorylawgroup.com>, Daniel Galpern <Dan.Galpern@gmail.com>, Andrea Rodgers <andrearodgers42@gmail.com>, “Crag Law Ctr: Chris Winter” <chris@crag.org>, Courtney Johnson <courtney@crag.org>, Our Children’s Trust: Youth v Gov <info@ourchildrenstrust.org>, Caitlin <caitlin@ourchildrenstrust.org>, “Blue River Law: Elisabeth Holmes” <eli.blueriverlaw@gmail.com>, Tamara Rose <tamara@earthguardians.org>, Xiuhtezcatl Martinez <xiuhtezcatl@earthguardians.org>, Russell Mendell <russell@earthguardians.org>, Mary Giardino <mary@earthguardians.org>, Dana Pauzauskie <dana@earthguardians.org>, Frank Volpe <Fvolpe@sidley.com>, Mark Hopson <Mhopson@sidley.com>, Benjamin Tannen <Btannen@sidley.com>, Marie Eckert <Marie.Eckert@millernash.com>, Suzanne La Campagne <suzanne.lacampagne@millernash.com>, “Governor Brown: Inge D Wells” <Inge.D.Wells@doj.state.or.us>, Paul Smith <paul.l.smith@doj.state.or.us>, “DoJ: Env & Nat Res: Sean Duffy” <sean.c.duffy@usdoj.gov>, Frank Singer <frank.singer@usdoj.gov>, Marissa Piropato <marissa.piropato@usdoj.gov>, Robert Lundman <robert.lundman@usdoj.gov>, Peter Dykema <peter.dykema@usdoj.gov>, Eric Grant <eric.grant@usdoj.gov>, Andrew Mergen <andy.mergen@usdoj.gov>, Clare Boronow <Clare.Boronow@usdoj.gov>, “DoJ: SupremeCtBriefs: Solicitor General: Noel Francisco” <SupremeCtBriefs@usdoj.gov>
Cc: US Supreme Court Judges via Electronic Filing Support Clerk <efilingsupport@supremecourt.gov>, “9th Circuit Court: Chief Judge Sidney Thomas via Clerk of Court: Molly Dwyer” <ca09web@ca9.uscourts.gov>, ABA American Bar Assoc <abanews@americanbar.org>, “Judicial Division: Amanda Banninga” <Amanda.Banninga@americanbar.org>
* Date: 2018-11-10 14:38
Subject: Roskazna: EoP Re: SCOTUS: Juliana v Brown & SWIFT & US Treasury Ftprint GWOT Metrics
To: “RU Treasury: Roman Artyukhin” <ovs@roskazna.ru>, Media <smi@roskazna.ru>

.

TO: US & RU Treasury Sec: SWIFT, SPFS:
Re: RT America: SWIFT Explained: A tool of US Empire?; Gold, Goats & Guns: For Russia, Change Comes Swiftly; via The Duran.

TO: Juliana v Brown: Kelsey Juliana Applicants, Counsel, Intervenor Defendants: American Petroleum Inst, Natl Assoc of Manufacturers, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers:
Re: Mother Jones: Landmark Children’s Climate Lawsuit Hits New Roadblock; 04 Nov: EoP Re: SCOTUS 02 Nov Order Re: Juliana v USA climate change lawsuit.

TO: Gov Brown, DoJ: SupremeCtBriefs; SCOTUS, 9th Circuit Judge Thomas, FJA, ABA:
Re: 30 Oct: EoP Re: 10th Circuit Court: John Roberts v Brett Kavanaugh & US v Tim McVeigh.

CC: Jason Brent, M Wackernagel, W Rees, P Murtaugh, ICJ: A Yusuf, X Hanqin, PCA:
CC: Pres Vladimir Putin, Stan McChrystal & Dalio Pittard Frank Seagal:

Sec’s Mnuchin & Artyukhin, SWIFT & SPFS, Juliana v Brown et al:

EoP Re: SCOTUS: Juliana v Brown & SWIFT & US Treasury Ftprint GWOT Metrics.

EoP MILED Clerk multi-tasking – on behalf of Dalio Pittard [daliopittard.tygae.org.za] and EoP Applicants [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za] whose preferences are available at Ego/Eco Literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] – EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law negotiations correspondence; to enable responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] orderly and humane prisoner release [prisoner-pardon.tygae.org.za] land reform [eop-landreform.tygae.org.za] denuclearization [eop-denuke-defn.tygae.org.za] de-industrialization and depopulation [eop-v-wip-deindpopn.tygae.org.za].

SPFS: System for Transfer of Financial Messages v SWIFT:
During the ruble crisis of 2014/15 Russia announced in the wake of U.S. and European sanctions over reunifying with Crimea that it would begin building a domestic electronic financial transfer system, an alternative to SWIFT. That system, System for Transfer of Financial Messages (SPFS), is not only now functioning in Russia, according to a report from RT it now handles the financial transfer data for more than half of Russia’s institutions. This is a follow up to last month’s boast by the Russians that their system was seeing a lot of international interest.  How much of this is boast and how much of it is reality remains to be seen, but the important point here is that the minute the U.S. weaponized SWIFT for use in its foreign policy, something like this was bound to occur. A common theme on this blog is that control is an illusion.  Power is ephemeral.  The best way to exercise your power is to have it but never use it.  Because once you do use it you define for your enemies the costs of their lack of compliance to your edicts. And if there is one thing humans are good at it is responding to known incentives.  Once we can calculate the cost of one behavior over another we can then decide which one is more important to us. Once costs of staying in SWIFT rise above the benefits of building your own alternative, you build an alternative. SWIFT is a market power similar to a CEO having billions in restricted stock in their company.  A lot of hay is made about the net worth of people like Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg. Quoting their net worth by multiplying their known holdings times the current price of the stock is useless.  Because they can’t sell it.  It is market power or perceived wealth that evaporates the moment they signal to the market their intention to sell. When you hear the announcement from a German bank under sanctions from the U.S. for trading in Russian energy that it will use SPFS as its transfer system, that will be the real wake up call to the markets. Change then will comes, forgive the obvious pun, swiftly. – Gold, Goats & Guns: For Russia, Change Comes Swiftly; via The Duran.

Juliana lawyers: Its not an environmental case, it’s a Brown v Board of Education civil rights case: 9th Circuit Judge: 15 Days: EoP Interpretation: Help me to help SCOTUS and ICJ to implement EoP SciCult Law: bring me EoP Policy statements [eop-policy-stmnt.tygae.org.za] from families, organizations, corporations etc:
On November 2, the Supreme Court vacated Roberts’ previous decision and allowed the case to proceed over the objections of Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch. Three days later, the Ninth Circuit halted the case for another 15 days [Alpha-Numerics: 1+5=6; anagram: sex]. “The Brown v. Board of Education case was all about school districts inflicting harm on children because of the ‘separate but equal’ policies. Our case is about the federal government knowingly inflicting harm on children through fossil fuel emissions,” plaintiffs’ co-lead counsel Phil Gregory told Mother Jones last month. “If you substitute a word like ‘segregation’ for ‘climate change,’ there’s no way the Supreme Court would stop this case.” Our Children’s Trust, a nonprofit organization aligned with the plaintiffs, made a similar argument in a press release. “This is not an environmental case, it’s a civil rights case,” the group stated. – [EoP Amended] Mother Jones: Landmark Children’s Climate Lawsuit Hits New Roadblock; Alpha-Numerics: Fig 17.2: Pythagorean Alpha-Numeric Code Chart: Leonard Horowitz: Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic Warfare; Wikipedia: Anagram.

Peak Oil & NNR and Collapse of Capitalist Economic Growth Theorems … EoP SciCult Law shut down Global WiP Ponzi Swamp Economy: Infrastructure conversion to low tech deindustrialized agrarian and primitivist economy:
So as you see it, why did President Bush and Dick Cheney and Rumsfeld and Condi Rice decide to invade Iraq? For control of oil and the preservation of the dollar as the world reserve currency. The geopolitical significance of Peak Oil is that man’s contemporary economic theorems are based upon unlimited [economic] growth and there is a strong correlation between high oil prices and recessions. So if we reach a point where the primary fossil fuel that drives 98% of the global transportation system, therefore ergo it drives the global economy begins to reach a point where demand outstrips the availability of a finite resource and that means that there are limitations to economic growth in the contemporary sense and therefore that’s a serious conundren. The geopolitical significance of Peak Oil and Peak NNR [nnr-scarcity.tygae.org.za] is that man’s manmade economic theorems or contemporary economic theorems are based upon unlimited [economic] growth and there is a strong correlation between high oil prices and recessions. So if we reach a point where the primary fossil fuel that drives 98% of the global transportation system, therefore ergo it drives the global economy begins to reach a point where demand outstrips the availability of a finite resource and that means that there are limitations to economic growth in the contemporary sense and therefore that’s a serious conundren. Because the United States current monetary system is based upon debt and paying the interest on money that is loaned on the assumption that future economic growth will pay for that principle plus its interest, and if peak oil begins, you begin to really think about it, you begin to ask yourself well ‘if we reach peak oil and there is a slowdown and aggregate slowdown in the global economy ad local economies, will there be future growth for all the debt that we have created, which is nine trillion dollars in this country and the answer is basically, probably not. What we almost need is a Peak Oil Peace Party, because right now we have a Peak Oil War Party, where you have an administration that knows about Peak Oil and they are forcefully pushing warfare with Iran as the next target of this issue. The main its going to require is for people to understand and accept global peak oil and to try to mitigate and understand that the government is incapable, at least as it is currently structured and funded. It is incapable of making the necessary changes that are required, because of mother nature. Because you really cannot debate mother nature. You have to accept her. Fossil fuel is finite and you know if we go around killing millions and millions of people, we are still going to burn it up and it’ll be gone, and then what? We would have spent all of our capital, all of our men, all of our resources. We will be bankrupt, you know morally, economically and we will have nothing to show for it. …… All Banks from Bank of International Settlements; Inter-American Development Bank; APRACA: Asia-Pacific Rural to the Agriculture Credit Association; to traded and privately owned corporations shall be nationalized. The Derivatives Market will go through bankruptcy proceedings and both the Derivatives Market and Stock Exchanges will be shut down. The EoP Economy shall be based upon already mined gold and ultimately a resource mix based currency standard; where all lending / borrowing and/or bartering is to be limited to consumption and production of non-renewable and renewable natural resources below Ecological Carrying Capacity limits. EoP SciCult international law will help to transform the planetary economy to a low tech sustainable agrarian and primitivist economy. EoP Amended: William Clark talks about Petrodollar Warfare [MG Copy]; Community Solution: Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil [SQ Copy]; Doug Tompkins: The Next Economy: Transitions from Globalization to Eco-Localization.
» EoP Leg Sub: 03 Jun: Military Necessity / National Security Justifications for Legally Supporting Turtle Island to continue teaching De-Industrialized Primitivist Living Skills; EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis Foreign Policy: Shut Down WiP Ponzi Swamp Economy.

Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education:
‘Howard Law School became a living laboratory where civil-rights law was invented by teamwork. The school worked because of the driving purposefulness of one man: Charlie Houston. He kept hammering at us all those years that, as lawyers, we had to be social engineers or else we were parasites. The whole atmosphere of action-oriented learning under Houston was heady, and every scholar was eager to relate classroom work to social action. We all worked on real briefs and real cases and accompanied Houston and other faculty members to court to learn procedure and tactics. Charlie Houston set out to teach us the difference between what the laws said and meant and how they were applied. His avowed aim was to eliminate that difference. He made it clear to us that when we were done, we were expected to gout and do something with our lives. He was a man you either liked intensely or hated.’ – Former Howard Law School student. Charlie Houston and Howard Law School’s top graduate of 1933, Thurgood Marshall, later to become a US Supreme Court Justice, demonstrated another knack that would enhance his career: he listened. It was not simply that he was deferential; rather, he never thought he knew all the answers. His way to wisdom was to hear out others who might or might not know any more than he did and then to sift it all through his own mental strainer. He never tried to score points as an original or especially creative thinker; his skill was in figuring out who made the most sense – or what parts of other people’s ideas to sieze upon and fuse into a prudent plan of action. “He’ll take ideas from a chimneysweep if they sound right to him,” said a former associate. – Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education, the epochal Supreme Court decision that outlawed segregation, and of Black America’s struggle for equality, by Richard Kluger, 1975.
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Dec: Omarosa & Gen Kelly: EoP Re: Omarosa & Gen J Kelly ‘Fired’ or ‘Resigned’ Dispute.

The greatest shortcoming of the human race is its inability to understand the failed state consequences of the exponential – breeding or consumption of finite resources at 0.1% or 10% growth – function.
Capitalist WiP – breeding or consumption at 0.1% or 10% growth – growth destroys the environment decreasing the nation’s lifeboat resources. Communist WiP – breeding or consumption at 0.1% or 10% growth –  growth destroys the environment decreasing the nation’s lifeboat resources. The only difference is that capitalist growth does it faster and with greater economic inequality. When nations choose to follow a Masonic capitalist or communist economic growth or population growth plan; they are buying a ticket on the Titanic liferaft. Whether they purchase a capitalist first-class or communist third class steerage Titanic liferaft ticket, they are purchasing a Shrinking Lifeboat Titanic ticket; where the end sinking of the WiP capitalist/communist titanic economy liferaft result is the same. A few years ago, one of the newspapers of my hometown of Boulder, Colorado, quizzed the nine members of the Boulder City Council and asked them, “What rate of growth of Boulder’s population do you think it would be good to have in the coming years?” Well, the nine members of the Boulder City council gave answers ranging from a low of 1% per year. Now, every once in a while somebody says to me, “But you know, a bigger city might be a better city,” and I have to say, “Wait a minute, we’ve done that experiment!” We don’t need to wonder what will be the effect of growth on Boulder because Boulder tomorrow can be seen in Los Angeles today. And for the price of an airplane ticket, we can step 70 years into the future and see exactly what it’s like. Now, in the ongoing controversy over growth in Boulder, someone wrote to the newspaper some years ago and said “Look, there’s no problem with population growth in Boulder, because,” the writer said, “we have fifteen times as much open space as we’ve already used.” So let me ask you, what time was it in Boulder when the open space was fifteen times the amount of space we’d already used? – Al Bartlett: Arithmetic, Population and Energy [SQ Copy]; Crash Course: Exponential Growth & Power of Compounding.
» IG: 17-07-08_mattiscrashcourse-fenwayparkexpgrowth; EoP Leg Sub: 11 Jun: White Sun of the Desert .. Heartiste; 26 Oct: EoP Obs: MAGAbomber NASA-ISIS packages to DNC; Putin Bolton Peace War Symbolism Nuclear treaty meeting.

SWIFT: WiP Global War on Terror Metrics:
The Terrorist Finance Tracking Program (TFTP) is a United States government program to access financial transactions on the international SWIFT network that was revealed by The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and The Los Angeles Times in June 2006. It was part of the Bush administration’s War on Terrorism. After the covert action was disclosed, the so-called SWIFT Agreement was negotiated between the United States and the European Union. – Wikipedia: Terrorist Finance Tracking Program;

Shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the U.S. Treasury Department (UST) initiated the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program (TFTP). Under the TFTP, the Treasury Department issues administrative subpoenas for terrorist-related data. – SWIFT: Terrorist Finance Tracking Program.

Donald Rumsfeld: WiP Global War on Terror Metrics Q:
The questions I posed to combatant commanders this week were: Are we winning or losing the Global War on Terror? Is DoD changing fast enough to deal with the new 21st century security environment? Can a big institution change fast enough? Is the USG changing fast enough? DoD has been organized, trained and equipped to fight big armies, navies and air forces. It is not possible to change DoD fast enough to successfully fight the global war on terror; an alternative might be to try to fashion a new institution, either within DoD or elsewhere one that seamlessly focuses the capabilities of several departments and agencies on this key problem. Today we lack metrics to know if we are winning or losing the global war on terror. – Donald Rumsfeld: Today we lack metrics to know if we are winning or losing the war on terror [PDF]
» IG: 15-02-12_drumsfeld-globalwaronterrormetricsq; EoP Leg Sub: 05 Sep: EoP Q for Bannon & Kavanaugh: EoP RH FR Ethics Control of GWOT Metrics?.

EoP Jack Alpert Simple Justice GWOT metrics – Children and/or Village Idiots like EoP MILED Clerk can Understand – Summary:
[A] Juliana v USA alleges that federal government violated their constitutional rights by causing dangerous carbon dioxide concentrations – climate change:  any change in the state of the climate lasting for an extended period of time; including changes in surface and ocean temperature, precipitation, or wind patterns, among other effects, that occur over several decades or longer, attributed directly or indirectly to human activity. Climate Change includes ocean acidification, sea level rise, and other impacts resulting from the increased concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere and oceans. Climate Change also has been called inadvertent weather modification, the greenhouse effect, CO2 problem, carbon dioxide problem, climatic changes, global warming, global change, global heating, atmospheric pollution by carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases, and dilution of carbon 14 by fossil carbon [Plaintiffs Req for Documents, pp.04, dd. 07.03.2017 PDF] – and they want the court to help them fix the climate change problem.
[B] Climate Change is a direct and/or indirect consequence of overpopulation and/or overconsumption by individuals who call themselves humans, citizens of nations.
[C] Human overconsumption and overpopulation are a direct consequence of clauses of international law allowing citizens in all nations; to procreate and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits.
[D] To help the court to help the applicants to take steps toward reversing the climate change problem; the applicants should request the court to recommend amendment of clauses of international law allowing humans to procreate and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; and replace them with clauses that require all humans of all nations and races and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.
[E] Helpful information for the Justices towards recommending international law clauses to reverse climate change is: what is a sustainable procreation and consumption human footprint; that is (a) scientifically based and (b) stated in simple language clear enough for layperson citizens, children and village idiots in all nations to understand.

The Ecology of Peace legal ‘sustainability’ – aka sustainable procreation and consumption footprint [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za] – definition has been submitted to among others International Criminal Court Judges [29 Dec 2015: ICC: Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi: Re: EoP ICC Private Pros: EoP PoW’s -v- Nobel Committee and Peace Laureates et al], US Secretary of State [03 Sep 2017: US Sec State: EoP suggested Amendment of ‘terrorist’ org definition in S. 219 Immigration & Nationality Act (INA)] and Intnl Court of Justice: Permanent Court of Arbitration Environmental Disputes Experts [03 Jun 2018: PCA: Hugo Siblesz: EoP Re: Judge JBrent: SustDev academic fraudsters should be executed] for their constructive criticism as to the (a) scientific accuracy and (b) village idiot simple language constructive criticism feedback.
» EoP Leg Sub: 05 Sep: EoP Q for Bannon & Kavanaugh: EoP RH FR Ethics Control of GWOT Metrics?; 04 Nov: EoP Re: SCOTUS 02 Nov Order Re: Juliana v USA climate change lawsuit.

Jack Alpert: Global War on Terror Metrics Exponential Function use of resources Answer Q&A: How Many Children / Much Consumption Per Family Leads to Peace?
The ecological overshoot full plate of the human predicament is one way to show why rapid population and consumption decline is required to assure all persons a safe distance from the plate’s edge. In the conversation, the listener has to understand that: a) the act of breeding/consuming above carrying capacity limits in an ecological overshoot full plate like environment means being a killer, serial killer, mass murderer or genocidal murderer, b) an ecological overshoot “full-plate” environment has existed for some time and thus all overbreeding/consuming persons have already engaged in a little or allot of killing, and c) surviving each day in the future means each person continues to kill a little or alot depending on the level of their breeding/consumption. The only way each of us can extract ourselves from this manslaughter predicament is to reduce the total human footprint so far below the carrying capacity that even increasing per capita consumption does not kill someone. And this means a much smaller population — maybe as small as 1 or 2% of the present global population.

Q&A: How Many Children / Much Consumption Per Family Leads to Peace?.

In Peace seekers have no plan for enduring peace [SQ Copy], Dr. Jack Alpert argues that Peaceniks failure to move society from conflict to peace, their establishment of never ending or honoured “peace accords, moral codes, acts of economic justice, and environmental laws, are like traffic signals” which “cause people to relinquish freedoms” but, “do not stop (change) the behaviors that increase scarcity, conflict, and environmental destruction”: “result from a faulty perception of what increases or decreases conflict. Where, peace seekers have acted as if conflict is caused by bad leadership maybe they should have acted as if trends in conflict are driven by trends in scarcity. Maybe they would have been more successful if they acted as if trends in scarcity are driven by the collective behaviors of 6 billion people. That while each individual acts benignly to achieve personal objectives the unintentional result is an increase in scarcity and conflict.”

Another reason for ignoring the above view of human conflict – according to Dr. Alpert — is that peace seekers, even when successful at restraining the police, military or mediating hostilities, do not change our course toward conflict. They only delay it. In the process, peace seekers consume the very energy required to change the things that would make societies head toward peace.

In Human Predicament: Better Common Sense Required: The Future of Social Conflict, Jack Alpert challenges us to answer two questions Corporate Oligarchs who profit from Unsustainable procreation (demand for more consumers), production and consumption, including its scarcity-conflict resource war consequences; do not want citizens, politicians, police, judges, prosecutors and those tasked with national security to ask themselves.

Let’s consider that Peace and conflict are defined not as descriptions of behaviour between nations, but as trends describing social conditions. Put differently: Conflict is not defined as the violence between neighbours and nations, but as the unwanted intrusion of one person’s existence and consumption behaviour upon another person.

There are two kinds of conflict:

* Direct: he took my car, he enslaved me, he beat me, he raped me, he killed me; and Indirect. Indirect intrusions are the by-product of other people’s behaviour.

* Indirect: ‘All the trees on our island were consumed by our grandparents,’ is an indirect intrusion of a past generation on a present one. ‘The rich people raised the price of gasoline and we can’t afford it,’ and ‘The government is offering people welfare to breed more children’ are current economic and demographic intrusions by one present group on another present group. Free Trade enabling overexploitation, overproduction and overconsumption of a nation natural capital resources is an economic intrusion by one set of oligarchs upon another set of citizens whose lives depend on such natural capital.

System conflict is the sum of intrusions experienced by each constituent, summed over all the constituents. A measure of the existing global conflict is the sum of six billion sets of direct and indirect intrusions. A measure of the UK’s conflict is the sum of 62 million sets of direct and indirect intrusions.

Using this definition of conflict, any citizen, politician, policeman, judge or legislator sincerely concerned about finding out whether and how the United Kingdom’s socio-economic and political system is moving towards peace or towards conflict; can do so, by determining the answers to the following questions:

Procreation Footprint: How many children per family leads to peace; or conversely how many children per family, contributes to greater resource scarcity, and exponential increase in conflict, i.e. an individuals’ ‘breeding war combatant’ status? [According to the research of Dr. Jack Alpert, the global answer – currently based on current population numbers — is one child per family leads to peace; two or more children leads to conflict]

Production/Consumption Carbon Footprint: How much exploitation and production of non-renewable and renewable natural resources relative to the nation’s Natural Capital carrying capacity footprint leads to peace; or conversely how much of a nation’s non-renewable and renewable natural resources can or should a corporation exploit into production of consumer goods, before such exploitation and production contributes to greater resource scarcity and exponential increase in conflict; i.e. a corporations ‘production combatant’ status? [All utilization of non-renewable natural resources—fossil fuels, metals, and minerals—at any level, contributes to scarcity-conflict. Peaceful utilization of Aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric natural habitats requires that they be degraded only at levels less than or equal to the levels at which they are regenerated by Nature. Exploiting renewable resources above their capacity to regenerate is not sustainable and does not contribute to peaceful resource relations; i.e. contribute to scarcity-conflict.]

In the absence of the worlds political, economic and corporate leaders confronting and acknowledging the difference between sustainable peaceful consumption and procreation and unsustainable scarcity-conflict aggravating consumption and procreation; and implementing legislation and Jurisprudence in accordance thereto; Dr. Alpert provides proof how the global AnthroCorpocentric Jurisprudence Suicide Freight Train has as much chance of muddling through the coming ‘Falling Man Syndrome’ Crisis of Conflict, as an individual sitting in an unbelted car crash. (Non-Linearity and Social Conflict)

Alpert compares humanity’s belief that “in 200 years, our Right to Breed and consume has resulted in the exponential consumption of over half of the Earth’s resources, and nothing bad has happened yet”; to a man who has fallen out of a 150 story building, passing the window of the 60th story, calling out to a friend “‘I’ve fallen 90 stories in the past 5 seconds and nothing bad has happened yet”.
– EoP Amended: SKIL: Forming a humane and orderly rapid population decline constituency is a solution to our predicament [SQ Copy]; Peace seekers have no enduring plan for seeking peace [SQ Copy]
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 Nov: EoP Obs: Suspect WiP Intnl law: A Breeding Debt Slaves & $#!thole mining economy serial killer eco-genocide killing machine.

Bridgewater Ray Dalio: Can we put EoP SciCult – procreation & consumption cap – Intnl law on Capitalism and Democracy?:
Is capitalism working out for the majority of the people? Capitalism is not working out adequately for the majority of people. And democracy is questionable in terms of how it is operating, I mean don’t get me wrong, I’m a capitalist, I’m in the business, don’t get me wrong, but its got to work for the majority of the people. … I believe that the biggest problem that humanity faces is an ego sensitivity to finding out whether one is right or wrong and identifying what one’s strengths and weaknesses are.  … Constantly worry about what you are missing. Even if you acknowledge you are a ‘dumb shit’ and are following the principles and are designing around your weaknesses, understand that you might still be missing things. You will be better and be safer this way. It is why we made money for our clients during the financial crisis when most others went over the cliff. Our greatest power is that we know that we don’t know and we are open to being wrong and learning.  One rule of radical transparency is that Bridgewater employees refrain from saying behind a person’s back anything that they wouldn’t say to his face.  Searching for historical precedents, Bridgewater put together detailed histories of previous credit crises, going back to Weimar Germany. The firm’s researchers also went through the public accounts of nearly all the major financial institutions in the world and constructed estimates of how much money they stood to lose from bad debts. The figure they came up with was eight hundred and thirty-nine billion dollars. Armed with this information, Dalio visited the Treasury Department in December, 2007, and met with some of Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s staff. Nobody took much notice of what he said, but he went on to the White House, where he presented his numbers to some senior economic staffers. “Ray laid out the argument that the losses he foresaw in the banking system were astronomical,” a former Bush Administration official who attended the White House meeting recalled. “Everybody else was talking about liquidity. Ray was talking about solvency.” His warnings ignored in Washington, Dalio issued more jeremiads to his clients. “If the economy goes down, it will not be a typical recession,” his newsletter said in January, 2008. Rather, it would be a disaster in which “the financial deleveraging causes a financial crisis that causes an economic crisis. . . . This continues until there is a reflation, a currency devaluation and government guarantees of the efficacy of key financial intermediaries.” As the crisis deepened, Dalio continued to assess it far more accurately than many senior policymakers did. When the government allowed Lehman Brothers to collapse, he despaired. “So, now we sit and wait to see if they have some hidden trick up their sleeves, or if they really are as reckless as they seem,” the newsletter said on September 15, 2008. … To me, if I don’t let everyone see everything with the tapes, its the equivalent of creating spin. In other words, why wouldn’t you let them see? If you are going to have an idea meritocracy, they should be able to see everything and ask questions. It raises interesting questions, gets them a sense of real reality. That also causes them to be bought in, cause there’s no spin. There is no talking behind anybody’s back. When you put things out in the open and everybody looks at it. You know bad things happen in the dark. … A lot of people just want sugarcoating. You have to be as accurate as possible. They have to be as accurate with you as possible. That you have to create a system that is not just an exchange of mutual feedback, but data collection. So if people are doing certain things, we can correlate if it is being done well or not. If people believe that there is a fair system, an idea meritocracy,  where the evidence becomes clear that you are that kind of a person. As long as you have a system that people believe is fair, and is being accurate about someone being that kind of a person. Thats not true that everyone wants that, because not everybody wants to stand naked infront of everybody. So its a little bit like going ito a nudist camp for the first time. Its very awkward. Everybody’s looking around, but before you know it you are talking about interesting subjects and you don’t pay attention to being naked. If you can stand naked infront of other people and have them stand naked infront of you, you can have better relationships and be more productive. It is about getting over that emotional reaction [to being vulnerable]. Your logical self wants it, but your emotional self doesn’t. Its about getting your logical self and your emotional self together. … If you don’t have radical transparency; you are going to have a lot more problems. So by making everything transparent you are going to have less lying, you are going to have less problems. Everyone is going to understand better. Isn’t it better to be that way?  – Ray Dalio; Bloomberg Markets & Finance: Ray Dalio on Bridgewater’s New Partnership; CNBC: Ray Dalio to take step back from Bridgewater: NYT; NYT: Ray Dalio: The Culture Principle; Business Insider: The Treasury And White House Ignored Billionaire Ray Dalio When He Warned Them About The Coming Credit Crisis Back In 2007.
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Jun: EoP Draft: Assange: Re: MEGA Database for EoP Land Reform Denuclearization.

Upright Man: Thomas Sankara: When the Trees Go, Man will follow Soon After:
Burkina Faso continues to be under threat from the advancing Sahara desert. During his tenure, Sankara introduced a reforestation initiative that saw 10 million trees planted. Our natural environment is getting systematically destroyed to make room for the aspirations of modern life. As individuals we have to be a little more conscious of how our lives are entwined with the natural world and the consequences that will be visited upon the lives of our children in the near future as a direct result of our present day mindless mass destruction of trees. ……. Sayed Rahmatullah Hashimi; Afghanistan Taliban Envoy: It is absolutely wrong that Osama Bin Laden pays the Taliban government for protection. He was in Afghanistan 17 years before the Taliban existed. Such people were instigated to go to Afghanistan and fight the Soviet Union and such people were called the hero’s of independence, not by us. Such people were called the hero’s of independence by the United States, by Mr. Ronald Reagan. And all of a sudden they were changed to terrorists. Okay if he is a terrorist, how are you going to justify to kill a man without giving him a fair trial?. The United States tried to kill him, without even telling us that he is a terrorist. All of these things have aggravated the situation. He was nobody and he has been made a hero now. He has been made so famous. Six thousand children were named after him in Pakistan only, and so many restaurants, cars, shoes, jackets, all these things. This is not our creation. When Afghanistan was your playground and you fought their war and all the problems in Afghanistan are a reflection of the world’s policies, not our creation. So if you don’t like the image in the mirror, please don’t break the mirror, break your face. So in Afghanistan we have said again and again, the problems are not our creation. I will give you an example. If you ask a pilot to go and bomb someplace, he will do it. If you ask him to slit a childs throat, he will not do it. You don’t see what you are doing, you are starving children. All you see is the destruction of two [Buddhist] statues, which is not a serious problem for us. Our children are much more important than these statues. There are many things that you pollute. What about the water in the world, you are polluting the water in the world, and that causes drought in our countries. You are polluting the air, what about that? You are destroying those old forests, thousands of years. What about that? Why aren’t they getting so much media attention as these two destroyed Buddhist statues? …. Imran Khan, a former star of the Pakistani cricket team who joined politics in 1996 and founded the Pakistan Tehrik e Insaf (PTI), has continuously reminded people of his party’s most successful programme – the reforestation scheme of the Billion Tree Tsunami to counter the effects of climate change. This was part of the party’s 2013 manifesto. Its successor is likely to be included in the new one. Imran Khan said that he hoped to “initiate a Ten Billion Tree Tsunami within our first 100 days of government”. This time, he said, the focus will be urban areas. In 2014, PTI had launched its Billion Tree Tsunami in the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, where it formed its government. Four years later, independent monitors say it had surpassed its billion tree target and met the Bonn Challenge of restoring 350,000 hectares of forests and degraded land. – Thomas Sankara: The Upright Man: Ten Lessons from Thomas Sankara; AfrinewsItaly: Thomas Sankara the Upright Man; Thomas Sankara; Good Reads: Thomas Sankara; Charlie Rose: Sayed Rahmatullah Hashimi & Barnett Rubin: 01.02.03; Third Pole: Does the environment matter in Pakistan’s elections?; The Hindu: ‘Billion Tree Tsunami’ transforms arid Pakistan region into green gold [SQ Copy]; Third Pole: Pakistan’s ‘Billion Tree Tsunami’ takes hold [SQ Copy]
» IG: 17-10-27_eopvwip-rulespollution; EoP Leg Sub: 23 Aug: MEGA: Draft: EoP Helsinki JCPOA ParisCop Exit Summit: EoP Axis MilNec Evac Authorization to FSB & NSA.

What if there is no EoP SciCult international law to enable global orderly and humane de-industrialization and depopulation & reforestation:

EoP v WiP Deindustrialization and Depoplation GWOT Metrics:
Summary: SS DEFCON Death Spiral Warning Alert: Unless Gov’s & Citizens cooperate to implement EoP Truth and Reconciliation responsible freedom path to EoP Scientific and Cultural – restricting procreation and consumption to below carrying capacity limits – intnl law, enabling orderly and humane de-industrialization/population; Gov’s & citizens are likely to end up in the There is No Tomorrow world where WiP ‘right to breed/consume’ intnl law is leading them: Failed States: NTE climate change chaos, 509 Chernobyl terror targets and/or industrial accidents, global economic collapse, race, religious & class war genocides, EMP nuke blackout resource wars, etc.
» EoP Leg Sub: EoP v WiP Deindustrialization and Depopulation.

If no implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law enabling citizens to cooperate enabling humane and orderly deindustrialization; capitalist – economic & population growth – failed states will follow the path of communist breeding war – population growth – failed states and be unable to prevent concerned, desperate and extremist people from taking resource distribution matters into their own hands:

Failed state economic and social collapse cause power vacuums …….:
Climate change will become a defense and security issue for four major reasons: there will be water wars, there will be oil wars, there will be massive migration on a scale that the world has never seen and there will be massive food insecurity. Its the kind of instability when governments and social organizations are unable to meet essential needs; that will cause fragile governments and fragile structures to become failed. That creates a power vacuum and into that power vacuum will be filled by extremists and people who can use terrorism to try and further their cause. – Global Obs: Climate Change is a Global Security Threat: General Clark: Climate Change will affect all levels of society.

Justice Scalia: Don’t fool yourself America will never have Auschwits Camps:
Don’t fool yourself into believing that the Supreme Court will never again allow a wartime violation of civil rights like it did in allowing internment camps for Japanese-Americans during World War II, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia warned law students at the University of Hawaii on Monday. Scalia said the nation’s highest court was wrong to uphold the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II, but something similar could easily happen during a future conflict. – The Blaze: Justice Scalia: You Are ‘Kidding Yourself’ If You Think World War II-Style Internment Camps Will Never Happen Again.
» IG: 17-09-07_fewgoodmen-handlethetruth-2; EoP Leg Sub: 14 Jan: EoP NTE Info Re: 01 Oct: US v Stephen Paddock; 13 Jan: HI Prepper Alert Missile; 02 Oct: EoP Re: Charles Luddington v Brett Kavanaugh: SCOTUS EoP or WiP honesty standard.

Atomwaffen has engaged in plans to cripple public water systems, destroy parts of the American electric grid, and blow up nuclear plants to cause meltdowns of American nuclear energy sites:
The Atomwaffen Division (“Atomwaffen” meaning “Atomic weapons” in German) is a neo-Nazi terrorist organization based in the United States. Founded in 2013, the group’s main base of operations is in Florida, but has members in other states such as Texas and Montana. The group is part of the alt-right, but is considered extreme even within that movement. Atomwaffen encourages members to burn the United States flag and Constitution, and to attack the U.S. government and minorities (especially Jews). The group’s membership is mostly young, and the Atomwaffen Division has been active on university campuses recruitment postering. The San Antonio, Texas chapter is listed as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Atomwaffen has engaged in plans to cripple public water systems and destroy parts of the American electric grid. Atomwaffen has also been accused of planning to blow up nuclear plants to cause meltdowns of American nuclear energy sites. The organization aims for a violent overthrow of the United States government by use of terrorism and guerrilla warfare tactics. Since 2017, the organization has been linked to five killings.

French Jewish Ecological activist fired five RPG-7 rocket-propelled grenade on the Superphénix nuclear plant:
For ten years, Chaim Nissim – a Jewish ecological militant activist – did everything he could to stop the construction of the Superphénix nuclear plant – on the Rhône river at Creys-Malville in France, close to the border with Switzerland, including training himself for underground guerilla, notably sabotaging electricity pylons with explosives. On the night of 18 January 1982, Nissim fired five RPG-7 rocket-propelled grenade on the Superphénix nuclear plant – two hit and caused damage, missing the reactor’s empty core. The weapon, a RPG-7, was obtained from the Red Army Faction through Carlos the Jackal and the Belgian Cellules Communistes Combattantes. – Wikipedia: Chaim Nissim.

David Besse Nuclear power plant terror attack holding over a thousand Nagasaki bombs worth of plutonium. The entire east coast will be toast!: Aide, Joint Chiefs of Staff: “Admiral Mullen Sir! Mark Sullivan, Head of Secret Service wants to speak to you NOW! We’ve got a problem.” Chairman JCS: “Admiral Mullen here. What’s up Mark?” Mark Sullivan: “Some crazy has landed on the roof of the spent fuel-rod building at the Davis Besse nuclear plant in Ohio. He claims his helicopter is full of C4 and if we don’t surrender he’ll blow the water out of the storage pool.” Admiral Michael Mullen: “My God man, there’s over a thousand Nagasaki bombs worth of plutonium in that pool. If he blows the water out of that pond it will start a zirconium fire that can’t be put out. All the plutonium/nickel-95/cesium will vaporize into the atmosphere. The entire east coast will be toast!” How would you handle this?” …. President Obama: “Rahm, this guy may be bluffing but we can hardly take that chance. How do you suggest we get him off that tin roof?” Rahm Emmanuel: “Did you know these nuclear plants were so easy to breach? We’ve made nuclear superpowers out of individuals. Reason with him? Beg? Give him what he wants then kill him later? Hell, I don’t know. How about us getting on Air Force One and moving upwind of him, just in case? ” President Obama: “Smart thinking. We can talk to him from the plane.” Scene 4: Air Force One Mike Sullivan: “We have verification he’s on the building in a Hughes 500. That helicopter can carry enough C4 to blow the entire building to smithereens. He left a call back number but it wasn’t his. I called it and Miss Cleo answered; said our future looked pretty dim.” President Obama: “I thought she was in jail.” Mark Sullivan: “I did too but apparently not; claims to know nothing about any nuclear sabotage. She knows we’re in trouble though. Maybe she really is a psychic.” President Obama: “I guess not. What’s it going to take to get you to change your mind? Money? We can print up all you can spend, guarantee your freedom.” Pilot: “Nah, I don’t want any money. I just wanted to prevent something like this from actually happening. It will, you know, unless you dismantle and secure these plants. You don’t even have no-fly zones over them. I can give you a dozen ways to breach them. This one’s just the easiest.” President Obama: “OK, that’s it then. You have my word. No harm will come to you. No press will cover this story. Is that all?” Pilot: “The press doesn’t cover any real story so I can believe that.” President Obama: “Whew, now fly away and go home.” – Vive La Revolucion: Checkmate [SQ Copy].
» EoP Leg Sub: 12 Jul: Dalio Pittard RF MEGA Notice Re: Prisoner Pardons & Land Reform; 30 Jul: Ted Keller: Draft: Marshall Pledge: EoP RH FR Ethics Control of Media.

One hundred power plants shut down: In a matter of seconds, fifty million people simply fall off the grid:
“No one could predict what is about to happen. Nobody is allowed into city hall cause the metal detectors arn’t working. .. One hundred power plants shut down affecting fifty million people in two countries… An emergency has been declared in New York State. In a matter of seconds, fifty million people simply fall off the grid. Phone lines and water systems fail. Thousands of people are trapped in elevators and subways. … It is August 14th, 2003… and the largest blackout in North American history causes six billion in damages. The official cause: overgrown trees on the power lines; but there is more to this story than troublesome trees. Just three days earlier on August 11th, someone, somewhere released one of the most damaging computer viruses ever written. Blaster. …. F-Secure Niko Hepannin… Did a computer virus somehow contribute to the Blackout.? ….. Bonnie: We could certainly shut down the United States critical infrastructure; I would assume within a day. Dedicatedly I would give it one week of research; one day to take it down. That means taking out the power grid; it means taking out the communication power; it means taking out probably the military capacity of the United States; to function properly. We would probably go into a police state at that point. [Is that an exaggeration?]. No I don’t think so. …. stormworm alone has infected at least fifty million computers; and it has not been used for anything; so there is this hovering literally perfect storm; of potential attack; so the concern is that if the storm worm has created all these compromised computers; and in themselves created this almost massive computer; and if very bad people have control of this; they may be able to do very bad things; on a very very big scale.” – Web Warriors.
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Dec: Omarosa & Gen Kelly: EoP Re: Omarosa & Gen J Kelly ‘Fired’ or ‘Resigned’ Dispute.

Chairman of the former EMP commission warned an EMP attack could shut down the US electric power grid for an indefinite period, leading to the death within a year of up to 90 percent of all Americans:
This is why North Korea’s test of an intercontinental ballistic missile is so important.  North Korea had test fired a total of 22 missiles so far this year, but this latest one showed that nobody on the globe is out of their reach.  In fact, General Mattis is now admitting that “North Korea can basically threaten everywhere in the world”, and that includes the entire continental United States.  In addition to hitting individual cities with nukes, there is also the possibility that someday North Korea could try to take down the entire country with an EMP attack.  If the North Koreans detonated a single nuclear warhead several hundred miles above the center of the country, it would destroy the power grid and fry electronics from coast to coast. So what kind of a “mass die off” would we be talking about? William Graham, chairman of the former EMP commission and its former chief of staff, Peter Vincent Pry, warned the hearing that such an attack could “shut down the US electric power grid for an indefinite period, leading to the death within a year of up to 90 percent of all Americans.“ Others believe that the figure would be lower, but pretty much everyone agrees that the death toll would be in the millions. – Zero Hedge: How A North Korean EMP Attack Could Kill Millions And Turn America Into A Post-Apocalyptic Wasteland.

A copy of this correspondence is documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za].

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk

Sent per electronic notice to:

US & RU Treasury Sec: SWIFT, SPFS:
US Treasury Sec Steve Mnuchin via US Mint (inquiries@usmint.treas.gov); Paulette Mobley (Pauletta.Mobley@usmint.treas.gov); IG (ThompsonR@oig.treas.gov); Press (press@treasury.gov); Devin O’Malley (Devin.O’Malley@treasury.gov); Sean Rushton (Sean.Rushton@treasury.gov); Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (Seth.Unger@Treasury.gov); RU Treasury: Roman Artyukhin (ovs@roskazna.ru); Media (smi@roskazna.ru); Swift (info@swift.com); Policy Managing Authority (swift-pma@swift.com); Moscow (moscow.office.generic@swift.com); Institute (Institute@swift.com); Press: Sophia Lyscom (Sophia.Lyscom@SWIFT.com); Jean-Marc Gustin (jean-marc.gustin@swift.com); Andre Goyens (andre.goyens@swift.com); CyberFT: SPFS Contact Form

Kelsey Juliana et al:
Wild Earth Advocates: Julia Olson (juliaaolson@gmail.com); Phil Gregory (pgregory@gregorylawgroup.com); Daniel Galpern (Dan.Galpern@gmail.com); Andrea Rodgers (andrearodgers42@gmail.com); Crag Law Ctr: Chris Winter (chris@crag.org); Courtney Johnson (courtney@crag.org); Our Children’s Trust: Youth v Gov (info@ourchildrenstrust.org); Caitlin (caitlin@ourchildrenstrust.org); Blue River Law: Elisabeth Holmes (eli.blueriverlaw@gmail.com); Tamara Rose (tamara@earthguardians.org); Xiuhtezcatl Martinez (xiuhtezcatl@earthguardians.org); Russell Mendell (russell@earthguardians.org); Mary Giardino (mary@earthguardians.org); Dana Pauzauskie (dana@earthguardians.org);

Intervenor Defendants: American Petroleum Inst, Natl Assoc of Manufacturers, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers:
Frank Volpe (Fvolpe@sidley.com); Mark Hopson (Mhopson@sidley.com); Benjamin Tannen (Btannen@sidley.com); Marie Eckert (Marie.Eckert@millernash.com); Suzanne La Campagne (suzanne.lacampagne@millernash.com);

Gov Brown, DoJ: SupremeCtBriefs: Solicitor General: Noel Francisco:
Governor Brown: Inge D Wells (Inge.D.Wells@doj.state.or.us); Paul Smith (paul.l.smith@doj.state.or.us); DoJ: Env & Nat Res: Sean Duffy (sean.c.duffy@usdoj.gov); Frank Singer (frank.singer@usdoj.gov); Marissa Piropato (marissa.piropato@usdoj.gov); Robert Lundman (robert.lundman@usdoj.gov); Peter Dykema (peter.dykema@usdoj.gov); Eric Grant (eric.grant@usdoj.gov); Andrew Mergen (andy.mergen@usdoj.gov); Clare Boronow (Clare.Boronow@usdoj.gov); DoJ: SupremeCtBriefs: Solicitor General: Noel Francisco  (SupremeCtBriefs@usdoj.gov);

SCOTUS, 9th Circuit Judge Thomas, FJA, ABA:
US Supreme Court Judges via Electronic Filing Support Clerk (efilingsupport@supremecourt.gov); 9th Circuit Court: Chief Judge Sidney Thomas via Clerk of Court: Molly Dwyer (ca09web@ca9.uscourts.gov); ABA American Bar Assoc (abanews@americanbar.org); Judicial Division: Amanda Banninga (Amanda.Banninga@americanbar.org)

Jason Brent, Footprint Network: M Wackernagel, W Rees, Procreation Factor: P Murtaugh, ICJ: A Yusuf, X Hanqin, PCA:
Jason Brent (jbrent6179@aol.com); Dr. Mathis Wackernagel (mathis@footprintnetwork.org); William Rees (wrees@mail.ubc.ca); Post Carbon Institute (info@postcarbon.org); Alliance for World Scientists (scientistswarning@oregonstate.edu); Scientists Warning (Contact@ScientistsWarning.org); Paul Murtaugh (murtaugp@science.oregonstate.edu); ICJ: Intnl Court of Justice (information@icj-cij.org); Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf (A.Yusuf@icj-cij.org); Xue Hanqin (h.xue@icj-cij.org); Antonio Oposa (tonyoposa1024@gmail.com); Paulo Burro (pacburro@gmail.com); Luis Moreno Ocampo (lmoreno-ocampo@getnicklaw.com); Permanent Court of Arbitration: Bureau (bureau@pca-cpa.org); Dirk Pulkowski (dpulkowski@pca-cpa.org);

Pres Vladimir Putin, Stan McChrystal & Dalio Pittard Frank Seagal:
President Vladimir Putin via Kremlin Press Office (press_office@prpress.gov.ru); Amb Anatoly Antonov: Embassy of Russian Federation in Washington DC: Press office (RusPressUSA@mid.ru); Stan McChrystal (stan@mcchrystalgroup.com); Bridge Water Associates: Ray Dalio (dalio@bwater.com); Bridgewater Corporate Counsel (Corporate_Counsel@bwater.com); Connecticut Attorney General: George Jepsen (attorney.general@ct.gov); Maj Gen Dana Pittard (dana.j.pittard.mil@mail.mil); Frank Serpico (serpicofrancesco@aol.com); Steven Seagal (stevenseagalofficial@hotmail.com).

.

Sent via Contact form:

Sent: 12 Nov 2018: 21:20 hrs: CyberFT: SPFS Contact Form

EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold war [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] to implement EoP Sci Cult law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law negotiations correspondence sent to US & RU Treasury Sec: SWIFT, SPFS – Re: RT America: SWIFT Explained: A tool of US Empire?; Gold, Goats & Guns: For Russia, Change Comes Swiftly – is published at: 10 Nov: EoP Re: SCOTUS: Juliana v Brown & SWIFT & US Treasury Ftprint GWOT Metrics

.