02 Mar: EoP Re: Grist: Censorship of population factor by climate change / footprint activists

* Eve Andrews, Grist, Chip Giller, Jason Brent, Bo Gritz
* 02 Mar: EoP Re: Grist: Censorship of population factor by climate change / footprint activists
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v Jason Brent, Bo Gritz v Donald Trump / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za>
Date: 2019-03-02 2:55 pm
Subject: EoP Re: Grist: Censorship of population factor by climate change / footprint activists
To: “Eve Andrews via Grist: Scott Dodd” <sdodd@grist.org>, Chip Giller <chipgiller@grist.org>, Katie Herzog <kherzog@grist.org>
Cc: Jason Brent <jbrent6179@aol.com>, Bo Gritz <bogritz@msn.com>

.

TO: Eve Andrews, Grist:
Eve Andrews via Grist: Scott Dodd (sdodd@grist.org); Chip Giller (chipgiller@grist.org); Katie Herzog (kherzog@grist.org)
Re: Grist: Humans cause climate change. Do we just need fewer humans?

CC: Jason Brent, Bo Gritz:
Jason Brent (jbrent6179@aol.com); Bo Gritz (bogritz@msn.com)
Re: 30 Jul: Ted Keller: Draft: Marshall Pledge: EoP RH FR Ethics Control of Media; 03 Jun 2018: EoP Re: Judge JBrent: SustDev academic fraudsters should be executed.

Eve Andrews:

EoP Re: Grist: Censorship of population factor by climate change / footprint activists.

Too Many Humans, Too Little Time: How come the huge impact of our population growth on climate change doesn’t get more attention when we talk about how to take action against warming?  – Grist: Humans cause climate change. Do we just need fewer humans?

Taking Sincere Action on Climate Change:

Taking Action to abolish any problem requires eliminating the root cause of the problem. If or when the problem requires a significant percentage of individuals to cooperate to abolish the root cause of the problem; then you need:

KISS: Keep it Simple Stupid Unconditional Cooperator Message:

That means that you need to be able to clearly and simply articulate the root cause of the problem so that village idiot people can understand the cause of the problem; so that even if they don’t participate as unconditional or conditional cooperators; they also don’t oppose the implementation of the solution. Your KISS message must also include clear simple instructions for how unconditional and conditional cooperators [Astrid Dannenberg: Climate Change Negotiations: Unconditional Cooperators and FreeRiders] who are sincerely concerned about the problem can cooperate to help to eliminate the root cause of the problem.

Solution must eliminate root cause and be race, religious, class, gender impartial:

The solution to the problem should not affect one group of people, based on their race, religion, ideology, class or gender, any different than any other group of people. If it does, its only a matter of time before the discriminated groups become insurgents against the Stop the Ecocide Titanic solution.

EoP Re: Root Cause of Climate Change problem: WiP intnl-law:

The conscious and/or unconsciously manmade root cause that enables climate change, are the man made legislated clauses of international law that allow people who call themselves humans to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits.

EoP Re: Sustainable Procreation and Consumption Footprint:

To answer your ‘are climate activists censoring overpopulation causes of climate change’ question you need to sincerely ask and answer the question: What is a scientific sustainable procreation and consumption footprint. EoP Answer: EoP footprint [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za].

The Ecology of Peace legal ‘sustainability’ – aka sustainable procreation and consumption footprint [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za] – definition has been submitted to among others International Criminal Court Judges [29 Dec 2015: ICC: Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi: Re: EoP ICC Private Pros: EoP PoW’s -v- Nobel Committee and Peace Laureates et al], US Secretary of State [03 Sep 2017: US Sec State: EoP suggested Amendment of ‘terrorist’ org definition in S. 219 Immigration & Nationality Act (INA)] and Intnl Court of Justice: Permanent Court of Arbitration Environmental Disputes Experts [03 Jun 2018: PCA: Hugo Siblesz: EoP Re: Judge JBrent: SustDev academic fraudsters should be executed].

Ecology of Peace advocates on behalf of abolishing the clauses of international law that allow people who call themselves humans to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za] limits; and replace them with Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] clauses that require all the worlds citizens of all races, religions and genders to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

The EoP – Bo Gritz v Donald Trump – submission to President Trump recommends the global implementation of Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law: 24 Feb: Bo Gritz: EoP Secretary of Defence Draft Offer to President Trump: DRAFT: Request Consent / Edits / Objections: UN Security Council & General Assembly Binding Resolution to Implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law [PDF]; Suggested Amended Definition of Rome Statute of Intnl Criminal Court Definition of Crime of Aggression [PDF].

EoP Re: Info for Unconditional / Conditional Cooperators:

Unconditional and/or Conditional Cooperators can sign their Responsible Freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] Oaths [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za]; and/or Ecology of Peace Policy Statements [eop-policy-stmnt.tygae.org.za].

EoP Depopulation: Re: How to determine who can and who cannot Reproduce:

The issue of how you arrive at fewer humans is decidedly less basic. Some entity has to dictate which humans get to produce more humans — or in an even more macabre scenario, which humans stay and which humans go. OK, so how do you choose which people have to go? Imagine the United States Congress — largely white people, many of whom enjoy great wealth, but generally all of whom consume plenty (in some cases thanks to their support of dirty technologies). If those people are making the rules on population control in the U.S., do you think they’re going to advocate for the rights of communities that aren’t like most of its members? – Grist: Humans cause climate change. Do we just need fewer humans?

Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law footprint recommends Jason Brent’s global one child law orderly and humane depopulation proposal:

Former Judge Jason Brent: A Global One Child Law Proposal: How to Determine Who Can and Who Cannot Reproduce:
The action I am initially proposing is value neutral and does not favor or harm any individual or group. The action I am proposing will be applied to every person or group without favoring anyone. The action is very simple—limit the right of any male to father only one live child and limit the right of every woman to one live birth. In simple terms a couple is limited to one and only one child—not one child for the male and one child for the female. Since survival of our species depends on the one child rule, under my proposal any attempt to evade the rule would result in death of the evader and of any second child. The rule to be fair must be absolute, without a single exception. If the female cannot or refuses to provide the name of the father she and the child shall be immediately executed. All of the ideas set forth in this paragraph may be considered horrible and inhumane. However, since they will be applied equally, no individual or group is harmed except to the extent that an individual cannot either father or give birth to a second child. The harm caused to the individual and the harm caused to all of humanity by enforcing the one child rule set forth above is miniscule compared to the harm which all of humanity would suffer if population were not reduced. – Jason Brent: A Global One Child Law Proposal: How to Determine Who Can and Who Cannot Reproduce;
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Jan: EoP TRC Info: Pakistan Chief Justice Nisar’s populaton control task force.

Only Global Deindustrializaton & Depopulation will Prevent Climate Catastrophe:

Tim Garrett: Only Collapse of Industrial economy will Prevent Climate Catastrophe. Paul Murtaugh: Every child increases a parents carbon footprint by a factor of 20.
Dr. Garrett is the author of the study that concludes that only civilization collapse can stop climate catastrophe: 2009: Are there basic physical constraints on future anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide? 2011: No way out? The double-bind in seeking global prosperity alongside mitigated climate change: Utah News Center: Is Global Warming Unstoppable? [SQ Copy]. Eco Shock: The Big Picture: Like it or Not [SQ Copy]. Collapse of Industrial Civilization: Say Goodbye to the Holocene Epoch. Dr. Paul Murtaugh: Reproduction and Carbon legacies of individuals. The Conversation: How Family Planning could be part of answer to climate change. The Guardian: Baby emissions fuel global warming.
» IG: 17-08-30_garrettmurtaugh-cnfamplanning.

One Child Law Depopulation or Global Cold War Warfare Depopulation?:
The Guardian: European colonization of America’s killed so many it cooled Earth’s climate. Alexander Koch: Earth System Impacts of the European arrival and Great Dying in the Americas after 1492 [SQ Copy]. Julia Pongratz: War, plague no match for deforestation in driving CO2 buildup. Carnegie Science: War, Plague No Match for Deforestation in Driving CO2 Buildup: Video. Daily Mail: Genghis Khan the GREEN: Invader killed so many people that carbon levels plummeted. [SQ Copy]

Former Judge Jason Brent: A Global One Child Law Proposal: How to Determine Who Can and Who Cannot Reproduce:
The action I am initially proposing is value neutral and does not favor or harm any individual or group. The action I am proposing will be applied to every person or group without favoring anyone. The action is very simple—limit the right of any male to father only one live child and limit the right of every woman to one live birth. In simple terms a couple is limited to one and only one child—not one child for the male and one child for the female. Since survival of our species depends on the one child rule, under my proposal any attempt to evade the rule would result in death of the evader and of any second child. The rule to be fair must be absolute, without a single exception. If the female cannot or refuses to provide the name of the father she and the child shall be immediately executed. All of the ideas set forth in this paragraph may be considered horrible and inhumane. However, since they will be applied equally, no individual or group is harmed except to the extent that an individual cannot either father or give birth to a second child. The harm caused to the individual and the harm caused to all of humanity by enforcing the one child rule set forth above is miniscule compared to the harm which all of humanity would suffer if population were not reduced. – Jason Brent: A Global One Child Law Proposal: How to Determine Who Can and Who Cannot Reproduce;
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Jan: EoP TRC Info: Pakistan Chief Justice Nisar’s populaton control task force.

EoP Global Land Reform: 40% arable land returned to reforestation; 60% used arable land: regenerative – soil carbon sequestration – low tech farming:
Guerrylla Laws are drawn up in accordance with the proactive conservation policies of Bhutan, who set aside 40% of their biologically productive to be returned to its natural state, for other species and wildlife conservation purposes; then that means that the total amount of biologically productive carrying capacity land available to humans is 60% of 12 billion; which amounts to 7.2 billion gha total; or 60% of 1.8 gha, which is 1 gha each. Population factor is relevant, because the more humans there are, the less biologically productive land there is for everyone else.
» EoP NWO SCO: EoP Footprint; EoP Leg Sub: 29 Dec: ICC: Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi: Re: EoP ICC Private Pros: EoP PoW’s -v- Nobel Committee and Peace Laureates et al; 03 Jun PCA: Hugo Siblesz: EoP Re: Judge JBrent: SustDev academic fraudsters should be executed.

Studies suggest that regenerating soil by turning our backs on industrial farming holds the key to tackling climate change. Soil is the second biggest reservoir of carbon on the planet, next to the oceans. It holds four times more carbon than all the plants and trees in the world. But human activity like deforestation and industrial farming – with its intensive ploughing, monoculture and heavy use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides – is ruining our soils at breakneck speed, killing the organic materials that they contain. There is, however, a solution. Scientists and farmers around the world are pointing out that we can regenerate degraded soils by switching from intensive industrial farming to more ecological methods – not just organic fertiliser, but also no-tillage, composting, and crop rotation. Here’s the brilliant part: as the soils recover, they not only regain their capacity to hold CO2, they begin to actively pull additional CO2 out of the atmosphere. The science on this is quite exciting. A study published recently by the US National Academy of Sciences claims that regenerative farming can sequester 3% of our global carbon emissions. An article in Science suggests it could be up to 15%. And new research from the Rodale Institute in Pennsylvania, although not yet peer-reviewed, says sequestration rates could be as high as 40%. – PNAS: 30 Oct 2012: Andreas Gattinger: Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming. Science: 11 Jun 2004: R Lal: Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security. Rodale Institute: Regenerative Organic Agriculture. The Guardian: Jason Hickle: Our best shot at cooling the planet may be right under our feet [SQ Copy].

EoP Scientific and Cultural Law Re: * Unlawful violence; * Responsible freedom property ration basic income enabling self sufficiency from partner/employer abuse; * Racial, religious & ideological cultural law lowtech agrarian, pastoral nomads and /or hunter-gatherer self rule homelands aka autarky [self sufficent] autarchy [self rule].

EoP RH FR: EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] is the recommended objective reality socio-legal cultural frame of orientation process for implementing EoP SciCult law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law.

All EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] Legal Submissions are essentially TRC: Truth & Reconciliation [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] submissions; which (a) clearly and simply clarify the – ‘right to breed/consume’ clauses of intnl law – root causes of all racial, religious, etc resource conflict; and (b) provide those guilty – plausibly due to lack of ego or ecological literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] character – of scarcity combatant crimes of aggression contributions to resource conflict; the opportunity to take responsibility for their breeding/consumption transgressions [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; by cooperating [eop-cooperator.tygae.org.za] to implement an EoP New World Order Social Contract that shall require all citizens of all nations, races and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

More specifically: EoP Applicants [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za] TRC process advocate’s the implementation of an EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] international law social contract that shall (a) require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za]; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; (b) nationalizes all property [eop-sdwipecon.tygae.org.za] and provide all responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za] citizens a property ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za] to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

Under EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] international law: (a) Scientific law unlawful violence will be procreation and/or consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za]; (b) Cultural law unlawful violence will be violation of fully informed consent.  Penalties for negligent and/or intentional engagement in unlawful procreation, consumption or deception violence are documented at Crimes of Aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]. Detailed information is available at EoP Scientific and Cultural Law detailing generally speaking how EoP Scientific and Cultural Law would work when someone is accused of a procreation, consumption or deception crime of aggression.

EoP Scientific and Cultural Law international law will provide a basic income of a property ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za] to all individuals who have signed their responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

Furthermore: if or when EoP intl law is implemented; EoP Scientific and Cultural Law international law shall allow cultural law territorial self rule homelands [cult-law-self-rule.tygae.org.za], for groups with subjective racial, religious& gender culture-conflict identities; who are willing to adopt responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] procreation, consumption and informed consent lifestyle changes, enabling a higher degree of orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation cooperation through the sharing of sub-cultural lifestyle values; in such self rule communities.

Ego Literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za]: Ecology of Peace culture’s honourable truthseeking enquiry and advocacy communication policy.

A copy of this correspondence is documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za].

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk

.