* CRL Rights Commission, Pheagane Moreroa, Legal Practice Council, Kathleen Dlepu, JS Grobler, Frank Dorey, Arnold-Mfusi, T Leope, Craig Lucas, Ra-eesha Engelbrecht, Hester Bezuidenhout, Susan Louw
* 07 Mar: LJ v CRLRC/LPC: H 45/19: re Sheriff Service to Pro Se v Rep Respondents.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub / EoP ADR: LJ v CRL Rights Commission et al / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Religion / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: Lara Johnson <email@example.com>
Date: 2019-03-07 12:23
Subject: LJ v CRLRC/LPC: H 45/19: re Sheriff Service to Pro Se v Rep Respondents
To: CRL Rights Commission <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Adv Pheagane Moreroa <email@example.com>, Legal Practice Council <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Director: Kathleen Dlepu” <email@example.com>, “Provincial Director: Gauteng: JS Grobler” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Western Cape: Frank Dorey” <email@example.com>, “KZN: P Arnold-Mfusi” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Free State: T Leope” <email@example.com>, “Legal Practice Council: Gauteng office” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Free State Office <email@example.com>, Kwazulu Natal Office <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Western Cape Office <email@example.com>, Craig Lucas <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Ra-eesha Engelbrecht <email@example.com>, Hester Bezuidenhout <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Susan Louw <email@example.com>
CRL Rights Commission, Chair Mkhwanazi-Xaluva & Adv Moreroa:
CRL Rights Commission (firstname.lastname@example.org); Adv Pheagane Moreroa (email@example.com)
Legal Practice Council: Kathleen Dlepu:
Legal Practice Council (firstname.lastname@example.org) Director: Kathleen Dlepu (email@example.com); Provincial Director: Gauteng: JS Grobler (firstname.lastname@example.org); Western Cape: Frank Dorey (email@example.com); KZN: P Arnold-Mfusi (firstname.lastname@example.org); Free State: T Leope (email@example.com); Legal Practice Council: Gauteng office (firstname.lastname@example.org); Free State Office (email@example.com); Kwazulu Natal Office (firstname.lastname@example.org); Western Cape Office (email@example.com); Craig Lucas (firstname.lastname@example.org); Ra-eesha Engelbrecht (email@example.com); Hester Bezuidenhout (firstname.lastname@example.org); Susan Louw (email@example.com).
CRLRC / LPC et al:
LJ v CRLRC/LPC: H 45/19: re Sheriff Service to Pro Se v Rep Respondents.
There was no response from any respondent consenting to negotiations or mediation; nor declining the invitation to negotiation or mediation; by 04 March 2019: 17:00 hrs.
In the absence of a respondent consenting to negotiation or mediation; applicant interprets respondents response as decline invitation to negotiation or mediation.
Applicant interpretation of the message of the correspondence from Legal Practice Council: Western Cape: Craig Lucas and Ra-eesha Engelbrecht [documented at lj-v-crlrc.tygae.org.za]; are that they are – on behalf of the Legal Practice Council – declining the Invitation to Negotiation and/or Mediation.
If any Pro Se CRL Rights Commission Respondent:
If any CRL Rights Commission respondent intends to represent themselves Pro Se; kindly let me know – by Monday 11 March 2019; 17:00 hrs – so that I can serve the documents on you by the Sheriff, and the matter between ourselves can proceed Pro Se; without lawyers.
If you need more time, let me know by 11 March 2019, how much time you need, and by when I can expect an answer as to whether you intend to represent yourself or be represented by a Masonic War is Peace lawyer. Difference between EoP and WiP law [eop-v-wip-law.tygae.org.za].
Represented CRLRC / LPC Respondents:
Please Note: I am in the process of drafting documentation; which may change depending on among others the response or not from CRLRC / LPC.
It may be filed and served as an Amended Notice of Motion invoking Equality Court procedural rules for Pro Se applicants; or as an Equality Court cultural discrimination application; requesting the following orders:
A declaratory order confirming applicants Ecology of Peace cultural membership.
A declaratory order defining and confirming the difference between Ecology of Peace and Masonic War is Peace legal services. [eop-v-wip-law.tygae.org.za]
Ecology of Peace Law — like EoP media, religion, charity, psychology, academia etc — is founded upon EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality; providing advocacy and information on how to cooperate to shut down the WiP Ponzi profiteering of resource conflict and misery economy, by turning off the tap; — i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict and war; by implementing Ecology of Scientific and Cultural law as international law; to enable orderly and humane de-industrialization and depopulation; that (a) requires all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizes all property and provides all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) cultural law self rule for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.
Masonic War is Peace Law — like WiP academia, religion, charity, psychology, media etc — consciously or unconsciously ignores or avoids educating their readers, customers, clients, etc of the — procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; enabled by the WiP right to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits clauses of international law — root causes of all — racial, religious, economic, ideological, political, psychological, academic, media, military, etc — resource conflict; enabling them to socio-politically, economically, etc parasitically profit from the racial, religious and class resource war conflict misery, resulting from overpopulation/consumption colliding with finite resources.
A declaratory order confirming Respondent CRL Rights Commission and Respondent Legal Practice Council to be Masonic War is Peace legal services organizations.
An order authorizing the applicant to be allowed to represent herself in any legal proceedings, with the assistance of a Standby / Assistance Counsel; whether paid for by the applicant, her family, or by the State via the applicant meeting the requirements of an In Forma Pauperis or Legal Aid SA application; if or when any respondent in such legal proceeding; is legally represented by a Masonic War is Peace legal representative.
An order for financial damages from the respondents to the extent that their conscious or unconscious failure to help applicant protect her cultural rights, by providing her with legal assistance and access to a court to protect her cultural rights; were a result of their conscious or unconscious discrimination towards the applicant on the grounds of applicants Ecology of Peace cultural membership and cultural legal values.
A copy of this correspondence is documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]: LJ v CRL Rights Commission [lj-v-crlrc.tygae.org.za].
Lara Johnson, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk