13 Mar: EoP Re: AOC Thunberg Birthstrike & Divesting from Weapons Dealers

* Kathy Kelly, Voices for Creative Nonviolence, Blythe Pepino, Alice Brown, Birthstrike, Extinction Rebellion, Jenny Brown, Victoria Derbyshire, BBC, Elle Hunt, The Guardian, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Justice Democrats, Raul Grijalva, Ro Khanna, Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, Pramila Jayapal, Sunrise Movement, Committee on Climate Change, UK Ministry of Defence, Nickolas Carter, MoD Freedom of Information and Environmental Information Regulation, Patrick Shanahan, DoD Duty Officer, RADM Michael Franklin Lohr, Allison Bone, VADM Bob Harward, Foundation for Defence of Democracies, Askari Associates, Lockheed Martin, Marillyn Hewson, Richard Ambrose, Richard Edwards, Scott Francis, Andrew Scott, Jeremy Hill, Sean Chait, Adam Snow, Jason Ginn, Brooke Harper, Nitin Arora, Centre Aéronautique et Spatial: Institut Supérieur de l’Aéronautique et l’Espace, Zarrin Chua, AUSA Military, Dan Kubiske, Black Five, FEC Federal Election Commission, Lynne McFarland
* 13 Mar: EoP Re: AOC Thunberg Birthstrike & Divesting from Weapons Dealers
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v US Congress, EoP v UK Parliament, EoP v Mil Industrial ComplexEoP v Extinction Rebellion / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMAEoP NTE GMG, EoP NTE GMUK | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 15:28:14 +0200
Subject: EoP Re: AOC Thunberg Birthstrike & Divesting from Weapons Dealers
To: “Voices for Creative Nonviolence: Kathy Kelly” <info@vcnv.org>, Blythe Pepino & Alice Brown via Birthstrike Extinction Rebellion <extinctionrebellion@risingup.org.uk>, Press <press@risingup.org.uk>, Action Strategy <xr-action@protonmail.com>, Legal <xr-legal@riseup.net>, Movement Strategy <xr.movement@gmail.com>, Regenerative Culture <xr.regenerativeculture@gmail.com>, Victoria Derbyshire <victoria@bbc.co.uk>, Elle Hunt <elle.hunt@guardian.co.uk>, “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez via Ocasio 2018: General” <us@ocasio2018.com>, Press <press@ocasio2018.com>, Justice Democrats <us@justicedemocrats.com>, Press <press@justicedemocrats.com>, Raul Grijalva <info@ourrevolution.com>, Ro Khanna <info@rokhanna.com>, Ayanna Pressley <info@ayannapressley.com>, Rashida Tlaib <Rashida@RashidaForCongress.com>, Ilhan Omar <info@ilhanomar.com>, Pramila Jayapal <info@pramilaforcongress.com>, Media <ansel@pramilaforcongress.com>, Sunrise Movement <team@sunrisemovement.org>, Varshini <varshini@sunrisemovement.org>
Cc: DefSec Patrick Shanahan via DoD Duty Officer <DutyOfficer@mail.mil>, Committee on Climate Change <communications@theccc.org.uk>, UK Ministry of Defence <parlibranch-treat-official@mod.uk>, Gen Nickolas Carter via MoD Freedom of Information and Environmental Information Regulation <cio-foi@mod.uk>, “US Navy JAG: 2002-2004: RADM Michael Franklin Lohr: VP Asst Gen Counsel Boeing” <michael.f.lohr@boeing.com>, “Corp Comm Officer: Allison Bone” <allison.bone@boeing.com>, VADM Bob Harward via Kara Schoeffling <Kara.e.schoeffling@lmco.com>, Greg Gardner <greg.m.gardner@lmco.com>, Anthony Brown <anthony.m.brown@lmco.com>, Nabil Azar <nabil.azar@lmco.com>, “FHH Firm: Mary Beth Long” <mlong@fhhfirm.com>, Foundation for Defence of Democracies <info@defenddemocracy.org>, Askari Associates <askari@askariassociates.com>, “Lockheed Martin: Chair: Marillyn Hewson” <Marillyn.A.Hewson@lmco.com>, “VP Space: Richard Ambrose” <richard.f.ambrose@lmco.com>, “VP Missiles: Richard Edwards” <Rich.Edwards@lmco.com>, Scott Francis <scott.francis@lmco.com>, Andrew Scott <andrew.scott@lmco.com>, “GA Tech: Dr Robert Braun” <robert.braun@ae.gatech.edu>, Jeremy Hill <jeremy.hill@gatech.edu>, Sean Chait <schait03@gmail.com>, Adam Snow <acsnow6@gmail.com>, Jason Ginn <emailjason@gatech.edu>, Brooke Harper <bharper2466@gmail.com>, Nitin Arora <nitin.life@gmail.com>, Centre Aéronautique et Spatial: Institut Supérieur de l’Aéronautique et l’Espace: Zarrin Chua <zarrin.chua@gmail.com>, AUSA Military Rep & Ed <ausacom@aol.com>, Dan Kubiske <dekubiske@gmail.com>, “Black Five: Jim Hanson” <jimbo@unclejimbo.com>, Laughing Wolf <wolf1@laughingwolf.net>, Grim Beorn <grimbeornr@yahoo.com>, Pinch Paisley <wpaisley@comcast.net>, Mr Wolf <The.Mr.Wolf@gmail.com>, MCQ <mcq51@bellsouth.net>, Chris Carter <crushnik@yahoo.com>, Uncle Pig <enlistedswine@gmail.com>, FEC Federal Election Commission <info@fec.gov>, “Inspector General: Lynne McFarland” <oig@fec.gov>
Message-ID: <b0063bbd999e8fb0fc96264c3cbfc977@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za

.

TO: VCNV: Kathy Kelly, Birthstrike: Blythe Pepino, Alice Brown et al:
Re: Peace Voice: Can We Divest from Weapons Dealers?; The Guardian: BirthStrikers: meet the women who refuse to have children until climate change ends; Birthstrike: ‘I won’t have children due to climate change’.
Ref: 11 Mar: EoP Re: Extinction Rebellion: How can we help; 08 Mar: Notice Re: LJ v FW de Klerk: Definition of Sincere Peacenik.

TO: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Justice Democrats, Sunrise Movement:
Re: 02 Jul: EoP Re: Ocasio-Cortez Time for – Courage for EoP Culture Change – Revolution?; 10 Oct: EoP Re Kavanaugh TaxSex Farm Plantation Legal Matchstick Bridge Collapse; 12 Dec: EoP SciCult Law Property Ration Security for Honesty Academic Truthseeking; 14 Dec: ALERT – Learning to Say ‘No’ to Risky Mega-Projects; 14 Jan: EoP Re: AOC & AHC: EoP Simple Law SciCult law Tax or WiP Complicated Carbon Tax?; 14 Feb: EoP Re: McConnell [EoP v WiP] or [WiP-L v WiP-R] Green New Deal Senate Vote.

CC: Committee on Climate Change:
CC: MIC: Military Industrial Complex & FEC:
Re: 24 Feb: Bo Gritz: EoP Secretary of Defence Draft Offer to President Trump; 11 Mar: Electoral Court: LJ v Election Commission: Filing of Pro Se Application.

Kathy Kelly et al:

EoP Re: AOC Thunberg Birthstrike & Divesting from Weapons Dealers.

Blythe Pepino, who turns 33 today, found that other women – especially those in climate-conscious circles – were struggling with the same question, but were “too afraid to talk about it” for fear of judgment or ridicule. The US congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez gave voice to their concerns last month, pointing to the increasingly dire scientific consensus and widespread government inaction: “It does lead young people to have a legitimate question: is it OK still to have children?” And so Pepino decided to publicly announce her decision – strategically making the personal political – by setting up BirthStrike, a voluntary organisation for women and men who have decided not to have children in response to the coming “climate breakdown and civilisation collapse”. In doing so, she hopes to channel the grief she feels about her decision “into something more active and regenerative and hopeful”. In just two weeks, 140 people, mostly women in the UK, have declared their “decision not to bear children due to the severity of the ecological crisis”, says Pepino. “But we have also had people get in touch to say: ‘Thank you for speaking out about something that I didn’t feel I could even talk to my family about,’” she adds. Many of these BirthStrikers are involved with Extinction Rebellion, which on Saturday threw buckets of red paint outside Downing Street to symbolise “the death of our children” from climate change. – The Guardian: BirthStrikers: meet the women who refuse to have children until climate change ends; Birthstrike: ‘I won’t have children due to climate change’.

Impoverished people living in numerous countries today would stand a far better chance of survival, and risk far less trauma, if weapon manufacturers such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Dynamics, and Raytheon stopped manufacturing and selling death-dealing products. – Peace Voice: Can We Divest from Weapons Dealers?.

Jason Brent: Abortion, Birth Control and Murder:
The carrying capacity of the earth is not only finite (and not infinite), but also decreasing every second of every day as humanity is using the finite and limited resources of the earth which are necessary for civilization to exist. At some point of time in the future the human population will grow until it exceeds the carrying capacity of the earth and civilization will collapse in a ball of fire caused by the failure to use the best and most modern means of birth control and abortion, caused by the failure to murder potential human beings before birth. Those that oppose abortion and/or modern birth control believe they are protecting the sanctity of life. They are not protecting the sanctity of life. They are merely delaying the time when the murders will happen from before birth to after birth; they are merely changing the description of those who will be murdered from an egg, a sperm and a fetus to a living, breathing human being; they are causing the pain of those that are murdered to increase dramatically (an egg feels no pain when it is not fertilized, a sperm fells no pain when it does not fertilize an egg; and we can debate how much pain a fetus feels when it is aborted early in the gestation process—-wars cause large amounts of pain to those who are raped, starved, injured, tortured, or killed).
» EoP Leg Sub: 10 Dec: Brent Jason: Abortion, Birth Control and Murder; 14 Dec: Victory Girls Blog: A Planned Parenthood Merry Christmas; 22 Mar: EoP definitions of unlawful violence & basic income.

Tragedy of the WiP intn-law Breeding / Consumption War Commons:
It is a mistake to think that we can control the breeding of mankind in the long run by an appeal to conscience. Charles Galton Darwin made this point when he spoke on the centennial of the publication of his grandfather’s great book. The argument is straightforward and Darwinian. People vary. Confronted with appeals to limit breeding, some people will undoubtedly respond to the plea more than others. Those who have more children will produce a larger fraction of the next generation than those with more susceptible consciences. The difference will be accentuated, generation by generation. The long-term disadvantage of an appeal to conscience should be enough to condemn it; but has serious short-term disadvantages as well. If we ask a man who is exploiting a commons to desist “in the name of conscience,” what are we saying to him? What does he hear?–not only at the moment but also in the wee small hours of the night when, half asleep, he remembers not merely the words we used but also the nonverbal communication cues we gave him unawares? Sooner or later, consciously or subconsciously, he senses that he has received two communications, and that they are contradictory: (i) (intended communication) “If you don’t do as we ask, we will openly condemn you for not acting like a responsible citizen”; (ii) (the unintended communication) “If you do behave as we ask, we will secretly condemn you for a simpleton who can be shamed into standing aside while the rest of us exploit the commons.” When we use the word responsibility in the absence of substantial sanctions are we not trying to browbeat a free man in a commons into acting against his own interest? Responsibility is a verbal counterfeit for a substantial quid pro quo. It is an attempt to get something for nothing. If the word responsibility is to be used at all, I suggest that it be in the sense Charles Frankel uses it (20). “Responsibility,” says this philosopher, “is the product of definite social arrangements.” Notice that Frankel calls for social arrangements–not propaganda. The social arrangements that produce responsibility are arrangements that create coercion, of some sort. Coercion is a dirty word to most liberals now, but it need not forever be so. As with the four-letter words, its dirtiness can be cleansed away by exposure to the light, by saying it over and over without apology or embarrassment. To many, the word coercion implies arbitrary decisions of distant and irresponsible bureaucrats; but this is not a necessary part of its meaning. The only kind of coercion I recommend is mutual coercion, mutually agreed upon by the majority of the people affected. To say that we mutually agree to coercion is not to say that we are required to enjoy it, or even to pretend we enjoy it. Who enjoys taxes? We all grumble about them. But we accept compulsory taxes because we recognize that voluntary taxes would favor the conscienceless. We institute and (grumblingly) support taxes and other coercive devices to escape the horror of the commons. The most important aspect of necessity that we must now recognize, is the necessity of abandoning the commons in breeding. No technical solution can rescue us from the misery of overpopulation. Freedom to breed will bring ruin to all. At the moment, to avoid hard decisions many of us are tempted to propagandize for conscience and responsible parenthood. The temptation must be resisted, because an appeal to independently acting consciences selects for the disappearance of all conscience in the long run, and an increase in anxiety in the short. The only way we can preserve and nurture other and more precious freedoms is by relinquishing the freedom to breed, and that very soon. “Freedom is the recognition of necessity”–and it is the role of education to reveal to all the necessity of abandoning the freedom to breed. Only so, can we put an end to this aspect of the tragedy of the commons. – Garret Hardin Society: The Tragedy of the Commons [SQ Copy].

Limited World: Time to legally limit Breeding & Consumption Rights:
“Every right must be evaluated in the network of all rights claimed and the environment in which these rights are exercised. If we hold that every right, “natural” or not, must be evaluated in the total system of rights operating in a world that is limited, we must inevitably conclude that no right can be presumed to be absolute, that the effect of each right on the suppliers as well as on the demanders must be determined before we can ascertain the quantity of right that is admissible. From here on out, ours is a limited world. Rights must also be limited. The greater the population and consumption, the more limited the per capita supply of all goods; hence the greater must be the limitation on individual rights, including the right to breed or consume. At its heart, this is the political meaning of the population and consumption problem.” – EoP Amended: Garret Hardin Society: Limited World, Limited Rights [SQ Copy].
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 Apr: EoP Re: James Allsup: Chris Cantwell vs. RC Maxwell: Right-Wing Optics Debate; 09 Jun: EoP SciCult Law Honour Broker Solution Info for ASEAN SG MoFA Honest Broker; 06 Oct: EoP Re: WiP Catch 22 Law Hillbillie Love – EoP or WiP SCOTUS Future – MooGasm Screamers; 24 Jan: EoP ADR Info for Women’s March Alliance and Women’s March Inc et al

Ecology of Peace definition of a scarcity combatant weapons dealer:

An ecocide scarcity combatant weapons dealer is any individual of any race, class or religion (A) with a procreation/consumption footprint greater than carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za] – i.e. an ego procreation and/or consumption footprint [eco-ego-footprints.tygae.org.za] – who refuses to cooperate to implement EoP SciCult law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law, and/or once EoP SciCult law is implemented as international law, refuses to sign their responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath; and/or (B) who – prior to EoP SciCult law intnl-law – is a conscious and intentional fake – ‘pretend I give a fuck about this or that resource conflict problem while doing fuck all about devising and/or cooperating with a clear simple strategy to eliminate the root cause of all resource conflict problems – peacenik [eop-v-wip-peacenik.tygae.org.za] / activist [eop-v-wip-activist.tygae.org.za].

If the advice you are giving – that people are listening to – is not focused on scientifically solving the problem you are working to solve, the problem will not get solved [eop-v-wip-natsec.tygae.org.za]. It does not matter if President Trump, President Putin and President Jinping appoint you as Supreme Commander of NATO, the Red Army and People’s Liberation Army; to help you to solve your problem; if your strategic goal for solving your problem is not scientifically focussed on addressing the root causes of the problem.
» EoP Leg Sub: 19 Feb: EoP NATO Re: Greta via NYT: Req Adult help for climate school strike children.

Ecology of Peace have advocated on behalf of implementing EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law, to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation; since 2002 [state-v-lj.tygae.org.za].

If Extinction Rebellion and/or Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and/or Justice Democrats and/or Sunrise Movement and/or Peace Voice; want to declare your non-violent support to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law; to begin immediate orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation; you are welcome to sign your responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za] or organizational Ecology of Peace policy statement [eop-policy-stmnt.tygae.org.za].

EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za ] – based on EoP Footprint [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za ] – is the Ecology of Peace culture’s answer to the EoP John Brown – how to get along without deceiving, overbreeding and overconsuming – Question: What is a Sustainable Procreation and Consumption footprint? EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] is the recommended objective reality socio-legal cultural frame of orientation process for implementing EoP SciCult law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law.
» EoP Leg Sub: 20 Feb: New RSA Climate Case Chart Filing: LJ v FW de Klerk et al.

Respondents Ecology of Peace Policy Statements [eop-policy-stmnt.tygae.org.za] are to be used (a) to provide a mandate in support of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za] options [eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za ] to implement EoP SciCult international law; and/or (b) to provide a mandate for any nations potential sincere peacenik current or former President to begin official EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] negotiations to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law.

Only Global Deindustrialization & Depopulation will Prevent Climate Catastrophe:

Tim Garrett: Only Collapse of Industrial economy will Prevent Climate Catastrophe. Paul Murtaugh: Every child increases a parents carbon footprint by a factor of 20.
Dr. Garrett is the author of the study that concludes that only civilization collapse can stop climate catastrophe: 2009: Are there basic physical constraints on future anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide? 2011: No way out? The double-bind in seeking global prosperity alongside mitigated climate change: Utah News Center: Is Global Warming Unstoppable? [SQ Copy]. Eco Shock: The Big Picture: Like it or Not [SQ Copy]. Collapse of Industrial Civilization: Say Goodbye to the Holocene Epoch. Dr. Paul Murtaugh: Reproduction and Carbon legacies of individuals. The Conversation: How Family Planning could be part of answer to climate change. The Guardian: Baby emissions fuel global warming.
» IG: 17-08-30_garrettmurtaugh-cnfamplanning.

One Child Law Depopulation or Global Cold War Warfare Depopulation?:
The Guardian: European colonization of America’s killed so many it cooled Earth’s climate. Alexander Koch: Earth System Impacts of the European arrival and Great Dying in the Americas after 1492 [SQ Copy]. Julia Pongratz: War, plague no match for deforestation in driving CO2 buildup. Carnegie Science: War, Plague No Match for Deforestation in Driving CO2 Buildup: Video. Daily Mail: Genghis Khan the GREEN: Invader killed so many people that carbon levels plummeted. [SQ Copy]

Former Judge Jason Brent: A Global One Child Law Proposal: How to Determine Who Can and Who Cannot Reproduce:
The action I am initially proposing is value neutral and does not favor or harm any individual or group. The action I am proposing will be applied to every person or group without favoring anyone. The action is very simple—limit the right of any male to father only one live child and limit the right of every woman to one live birth. In simple terms a couple is limited to one and only one child—not one child for the male and one child for the female. Since survival of our species depends on the one child rule, under my proposal any attempt to evade the rule would result in death of the evader and of any second child. The rule to be fair must be absolute, without a single exception. If the female cannot or refuses to provide the name of the father she and the child shall be immediately executed. All of the ideas set forth in this paragraph may be considered horrible and inhumane. However, since they will be applied equally, no individual or group is harmed except to the extent that an individual cannot either father or give birth to a second child. The harm caused to the individual and the harm caused to all of humanity by enforcing the one child rule set forth above is miniscule compared to the harm which all of humanity would suffer if population were not reduced. – Jason Brent: A Global One Child Law Proposal: How to Determine Who Can and Who Cannot Reproduce.
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Jan: EoP TRC Info: Pakistan Chief Justice Nisar’s populaton control task force.

EoP Global Land Reform: 40% arable land returned to reforestation; 60% used arable land: regenerative – soil carbon sequestration – low tech farming:
Guerrylla Laws are drawn up in accordance with the proactive conservation policies of Bhutan, who set aside 40% of their biologically productive to be returned to its natural state, for other species and wildlife conservation purposes; then that means that the total amount of biologically productive carrying capacity land available to humans is 60% of 12 billion; which amounts to 7.2 billion gha total; or 60% of 1.8 gha, which is 1 gha each. Population factor is relevant, because the more humans there are, the less biologically productive land there is for everyone else.
» EoP NWO SCO: EoP Footprint; EoP Leg Sub: 29 Dec: ICC: Judge Silvia Fernandez de Gurmendi: Re: EoP ICC Private Pros: EoP PoW’s -v- Nobel Committee and Peace Laureates et al; 03 Jun PCA: Hugo Siblesz: EoP Re: Judge JBrent: SustDev academic fraudsters should be executed.

Studies suggest that regenerating soil by turning our backs on industrial farming holds the key to tackling climate change. Soil is the second biggest reservoir of carbon on the planet, next to the oceans. It holds four times more carbon than all the plants and trees in the world. But human activity like deforestation and industrial farming – with its intensive ploughing, monoculture and heavy use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides – is ruining our soils at breakneck speed, killing the organic materials that they contain. There is, however, a solution. Scientists and farmers around the world are pointing out that we can regenerate degraded soils by switching from intensive industrial farming to more ecological methods – not just organic fertiliser, but also no-tillage, composting, and crop rotation. Here’s the brilliant part: as the soils recover, they not only regain their capacity to hold CO2, they begin to actively pull additional CO2 out of the atmosphere. The science on this is quite exciting. A study published recently by the US National Academy of Sciences claims that regenerative farming can sequester 3% of our global carbon emissions. An article in Science suggests it could be up to 15%. And new research from the Rodale Institute in Pennsylvania, although not yet peer-reviewed, says sequestration rates could be as high as 40%. – PNAS: 30 Oct 2012: Andreas Gattinger: Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming. Science: 11 Jun 2004: R Lal: Soil Carbon Sequestration Impacts on Global Climate Change and Food Security. Rodale Institute: Regenerative Organic Agriculture. The Guardian: Jason Hickle: Our best shot at cooling the planet may be right under our feet [SQ Copy].

End Abel & Kane Cold War Global EoP SciCult intnl-law aggressive Energy and environment orderly and humane Denuclearization Land Reform Shut Down of the Industrial War Economy Swamp Negotiations:

EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] multi-tasking [mt-summary.tygae.org.za] negotiations correspondence – on behalf of Dalio Pittard [daliopittard.tygae.org.za] and EoP Applicants [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za] whose preferences are available at Ego/Eco Literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] – to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law; to [A] enable responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] orderly and humane – de-industrialization and depopulation [eop-v-wip-deindpopn.tygae.org.za], prisoner release [prisoner-pardon.tygae.org.za], land reform [eop-landreform.tygae.org.za] and denuclearization [eop-denuke-defn.tygae.org.za] – shut down of the WiP Ponzi Swamp economy [eop-sdwipecon.tygae.org.za]; [B] require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed [one-child-law.tygae.org.za] and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za]; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; [C] nationalize all property and provide all responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath citizens: (i) cultural law self rule [cult-law-self-rule.tygae.org.za] homelands for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za] to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za].

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
Former MILED Clerk & Acting Clerk

Sent per electronic service to:

VCNV: Kathy Kelly, Birthstrike: Blythe Pepino, Alice Brown et al:
Voices for Creative Nonviolence: Kathy Kelly (info@vcnv.org); Blythe Pepino & Alice Brown via Birthstrike Extinction Rebellion Rebellion (extinctionrebellion@risingup.org.uk); Press (press@risingup.org.uk); Action Strategy (xr-action@protonmail.com); Legal (xr-legal@riseup.net); Movement Strategy (xr.movement@gmail.com); Regenerative Culture (xr.regenerativeculture@gmail.com); Jenny Brown Birthstrike Contact Form; Victoria Derbyshire (victoria@bbc.co.uk); Elle Hunt (elle.hunt@guardian.co.uk)

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Justice Democrats, Sunrise Movement:
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez via Ocasio 2018: General (us@ocasio2018.com); Press (press@ocasio2018.com); Justice Democrats (us@justicedemocrats.com); Press (press@justicedemocrats.com); Raul Grijalva (info@ourrevolution.com); Ro Khanna (info@rokhanna.com); Ayanna Pressley (info@ayannapressley.com); Rashida Tlaib (Rashida@RashidaForCongress.com); Ilhan Omar (info@ilhanomar.com); Pramila Jayapal (info@pramilaforcongress.com); Media (ansel@pramilaforcongress.com); Sunrise Movement (team@sunrisemovement.org); Varshini (varshini@sunrisemovement.org);

Committee on Climate Change:
Committee on Climate Change (communications@theccc.org.uk); UK Ministry of Defence (parlibranch-treat-official@mod.uk); Gen Nickolas Carter via MoD Freedom of Information and Environmental Information Regulation (cio-foi@mod.uk)

MIC: Military Industrial Complex & FEC:
DefSec Patrick Shanahan via DoD Duty Officer (DutyOfficer@mail.mil); US Navy JAG: 2002-2004: RADM Michael Franklin Lohr: VP Asst Gen Counsel Boeing (michael.f.lohr@boeing.com); Corp Comm Officer: Allison Bone (allison.bone@boeing.com); VADM Bob Harward via Kara Schoeffling (Kara.e.schoeffling@lmco.com); Greg Gardner (greg.m.gardner@lmco.com); Anthony Brown (anthony.m.brown@lmco.com); Nabil Azar (nabil.azar@lmco.com); FHH Firm: Mary Beth Long (mlong@fhhfirm.com); Foundation for Defence of Democracies (info@defenddemocracy.org); Askari Associates (askari@askariassociates.com); Lockheed Martin: Chair: Marillyn Hewson (Marillyn.A.Hewson@lmco.com); VP Space: Richard Ambrose (richard.f.ambrose@lmco.com); VP Missiles: Richard Edwards (Rich.Edwards@lmco.com); Scott Francis (scott.francis@lmco.com); Andrew Scott (andrew.scott@lmco.com); GA Tech: Dr Robert Braun (robert.braun@ae.gatech.edu); Jeremy Hill (jeremy.hill@gatech.edu); Sean Chait (schait03@gmail.com); Adam Snow (acsnow6@gmail.com); Jason Ginn (emailjason@gatech.edu); Brooke Harper (bharper2466@gmail.com); Nitin Arora (nitin.life@gmail.com); Centre Aéronautique et Spatial: Institut Supérieur de l’Aéronautique et l’Espace: Zarrin Chua (zarrin.chua@gmail.com); AUSA Military Rep & Ed (ausacom@aol.com); Dan Kubiske (dekubiske@gmail.com); Black Five: Jim Hanson (jimbo@unclejimbo.com); Laughing Wolf (wolf1@laughingwolf.net); Grim Beorn (grimbeornr@yahoo.com); Pinch Paisley (wpaisley@comcast.net); Mr Wolf (The.Mr.Wolf@gmail.com); MCQ (mcq51@bellsouth.net); Chris Carter (crushnik@yahoo.com); Uncle Pig (enlistedswine@gmail.com); FEC Federal Election Commission (info@fec.gov); Inspector General: Lynne McFarland (oig@fec.gov)

.

Sent via Contact Form:

Sent: 15 Mar 2019: 22:24 hrs: Jenny Brown Birthstrike Contact Form.

EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War [eoptrc-akcoldwar.tygae.org.za] negotiations correspondence – on behalf of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za] – to implement [eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za] EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law; sent to 13 March 2019; is published at EoP Leg Sub: 13 Mar: EoP Re: AOC Thunberg Birthstrike & Divesting from Weapons Dealers.

.