* Cheryldene Martin, Supreme Court of Appeal, Electoral Court, Justice B H Mbha, Samkelo Mgxekwa, Charmaine Vandermerwe, Annerie Vorster, Election Commission, Simon Mamabolo, Glen Mashinini, Brian Heuvel
* 14 Mar: EoP Re: Sam Mgxekwa: Re: Electoral Court: LJ v IEC: Filing of Pro Se Application
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v IEC / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: Lara Johnson <email@example.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:30:33 +0200
Subject: EoP Re: Sam Mgxekwa: Re: Electoral Court: LJ v IEC: Filing of Pro Se Application
To: “SCA Director: Cheryldene Martin” <CMartin@justice.gov.za>
Cc: “Electoral Court in Bloemfontein: Secretary to Justice B H Mbha: Chairman of the Electoral Court: Samkelo Mgxekwa” <SMgxekwa@sca.judiciary.org.za>, Charmaine Vandermerwe <CVandermerwe@sca.judiciary.org.za>, Annerie Vorster <AVorster@sca.judiciary.org.za>, “Chief Electoral Ofc: Simon Mamabolo” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “IEC: Independent Electoral Commission: Chair: Mr. Glen Mashinini” <email@example.com>, “Manager of voter registration and Party Liaison: Brian Heuvel” <firstname.lastname@example.org>
TO: Supreme Court of Appeal: Director: Cheryldene Martin
CC: Electoral Court Secretary: Samkelo Mgxekwa:
CC: SCA Registrar: C vanderMerwe, A Vorster:
CC: Election Commission Respondents:
Re: Electoral Court: LJ v IEC: Filing of EoP Pro Se Application.
EoP Re: Sam Mgxekwa: Re: Electoral Court: LJ v IEC: Filing of Pro Se Application.
If – I Repeat IF – my interpretation of Sam Mgxekwa’s response [12 Mar: EoP Re: Sam Mgxekwa: Re: Electoral Court: LJ v IEC: Filing of Pro Se Application] – on behalf of himself and/or on behalf of Justice B H Mbha: Chairman of the Electoral Court – to EoP Pro Se application to the Electoral Court [11 Mar: Electoral Court: LJ v IEC: Filing of Pro Se Application] is accurate:
Ecology of Peace interpretation:
Justice Mbha is a Masonic War is Peace only judge. Ecology of Peace culture applications are not welcome in his court. Ecology of Peace sincere peacenik citizens should fuck off to another court which has EoP and WiP judges.
Samkelo Mgxekwa is a Masonic War is Peace only Secretary of the Electoral Court. Ecology of Peace culture applications are not welcome for his Electoral Court filing and lodging processing. Ecology of Peace sincere peacenik citizens should fuck off to another court which has EoP and WiP clerks / registrars.
» EoP Leg Sub: 12 Mar: EoP Re: Sam Mgxekwa: Re: Electoral Court: LJ v IEC: Filing of Pro Se Application
As of date Electoral Court Secretary Sam Mgxekwa has not responded to clarify whether either interpretation is accurate, or if not, how it is inaccurate; and/or if both are accurate; to honourably confirm such accuracy. Nor has he informed me of his intention to clarify whether my interpretations are accurate or not, and if so, by when he would intend to do so.
Consequently this correspondence to yourself:
As director of the Supreme Court of Appeal, supervising the Electoral Court:
Are you willing to ask the Judges of the Supreme Court, whether any of them are willing to consider themselves as EoP and WiP Judges: or whether they are all WiP Only Judges.
Difference between EoP and WiP law [eop-v-wip-law.tygae.org.za].
» EoP Leg Sub: 26 Feb: LJ v LPC: Req for Info to Cape Law Soc Pro Bono Dept.
Conflict of Cultures: EoP and WiP; or WiP Only Arbitrator Dispute Resolution policy:
If you are willing to provide alternative dispute resolution arbitration proceedings; could you clarify whether your juridical arbitration socio-cultural decision-making in a case involving individuals from different culture’s is monocultural or multicultural; in this case EoP and WiP; or WiP only. EoP refers to Ecology of Peace. WiP refers to Masonic War is Peace.
A ‘Conflict of Cultures’ court or arbitrator would consider culturally based evidence from any individual whatever their culture; even if none of the courts judges or arbitrators were members of one or both of the parties cultures; in order to reach a win-win compromise. A Monoculture court will consider only culturally based evidence from a particular culture; which could be racial, religious, class or ideological.
In this case an EoP and WiP court or arbitrator would consider both EoP and WiP cultural evidence; even if none of the courts judges or arbitrators were members of one or both of the parties cultures. A WiP only court would consider only WiP cultural evidence; denying access to the court’s arbitration proceedings, from individuals who are not members of a WiP culture.
» EoP Leg Sub: 27 Oct: Req for Info: ADR and Conflict of Cultures.
If there are any EoP and WiP Supreme Court of Appeal judges, can such EoP and WiP SCA judge be referred to hear the EoP Pro Se Electoral Court application, either as a temporary Electoral Court judge and/or in his capacity as a Supreme Court of Appeal judge.
Alternatively, if there are no EoP and WiP Judges on the Supreme Court of Appeal:
Are you willing to appoint a temporary EoP and WiP Judge: i.e. an individual appointed as a Judge by the Judicial Service Commission, who has been willing to hear cases from an individual who is a member of an Ecology of Peace culture.
As noted in the application to Judge Mbha: the following juridical individuals are – in my experience – South African Judges who have been willing to have Ecology of Peace applications submitted into their Equality / High / Constitutional Courts: former Concourt Chief Justice: Sandile Ngcobo and Judge J Lamont.
03 May 2010: CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride: Order by Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo: “The Chief Justice has issued the following directions: Ms Lara Johnstone, Member of the Radical Honesty Culture and Religion, is admitted as an amicus curiae.” [PDF]
09 Dec 2011: EQ 20968/2010: Judge J Lamont: Equality Court Johannesburg: Afri-Forum and Another v Malema and Others: Although neither the applicants nor respondents consented to the EoP Amicus submission; Judge Lamont accepted the EoP application to be filed into the court record; as noted in his ruling: “ Lara Johnstone, the sole member of an entity known as the Radical Honesty Culture and Religion delivered a number of documents by electronic transmission. I tabled the documents at the hearing and they form part of the record.”
EoP Leg Sub: 11 Mar: Electoral Court: LJ v IEC: Filing of Pro Se Application: Affidavit [PDF]
Alternatively: do you have any alternative suggestions?
A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]: LJ v IEC [lj-v-iec.tygae.org.za].
Lara Johnson [EoP Oath PDF]
Pro Se Applicant
Sent per electronic service to:
Supreme Court of Appeal: C Martin:
Director: Cheryldene Martin (CMartin@justice.gov.za)
Electoral Court Secretary: Samkelo Mgxekwa:
Electoral Court in Bloemfontein: Secretary to Justice B H Mbha: Chairman of the Electoral Court: Samkelo Mgxekwa (SMgxekwa@sca.judiciary.org.za)
SCA Registrar: C vanderMerwe, A Vorster:
Charmaine Vandermerwe (CVandermerwe@sca.judiciary.org.za); Annerie Vorster (AVorster@sca.judiciary.org.za);
Election Commission Respondents:
Chief Electoral Ofc: Simon Mamabolo (email@example.com); IEC: Independent Electoral Commission: Chair: Mr. Glen Mashinini (firstname.lastname@example.org); Manager of voter registration and Party Liaison: Brian Heuvel (email@example.com)