17 Apr: Req for Psych Info to George Psychologists

* Mari-Luisa Becker, Christie Els, Hetta van Niekerk, HJ Stander, Carien Brown, JA Moll, Tjaart van der Walt, Estelle Crause, Randall Raubenheimer, CS Hattingh, Jeanne Fourie-Hattingh, CB Buchner
* 17 Apr: Req for Psych Info to George Psychologists
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v HPCSA / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Psych, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: Lara Johnson <eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 17:07:56 +0200
Subject: Req for Psych Info to George Psychologists
To: Mari-Luisa Becker <info@mari-luisa.co.za>, Christie Els <cels@tekel.co.za>, Hetta van Niekerk <pivan@xsinet.co.za>, HJ Stander <wiltshire.hanjo21@gmail.com>, Carien Brown <carien@carienbrown.co.za>, JA Moll <jamoll.psych@gmail.com>, Tjaart van der Walt <tspvdw@absamail.co.za>, Randall Raubenheimer <randall.rfr@gmail.com>, CS Hattingh <callie@intekom.co.za>, Jeanne Fourie-Hattingh <jeanne.fourie@gmail.com>, CB Buchner <b.buchner@absamail.co.za>
Message-ID: <6fcb63a36f44fc42c60c0b93dd0c8d2f@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za

.

George Psychologists:
Mari-Luisa Becker, Christie Els, Hetta van Niekerk, HJ Stander, Carien Brown, JA Moll, Tjaart van der Walt, Estelle Crause, Randall Raubenheimer, CS Hattingh, Jeanne Fourie-Hattingh, CB Buchner

Mari-Luisa Becker / Christie Els / Hetta van Niekerk / HJ Stander / Carien Brown / JA Moll / Tjaart van der Walt / Estelle Crause / Randall Raubenheimer / CS Hattingh / Jeanne Fourie-Hattingh / CB Buchner

Req for Psych Info to George Psychologists:

I currently have two applications in the George High Court: Case H 51/19: LJ v GHJ et al [lj-v-ghj.tygae.org.za] and H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC [lj-v-crlrc.tygae.org.za], which include intersections between psychology doctrine and culture; as documented in attached excerpts of Statements of Claim: Request for Cultural [PDF] and Psych [PDF] Information.

Please email me asap if you are a George based psychologist who is willing to confirm in an under oath affidavit for a George High Court case; that (a) your legal definition of a mental disorder is based upon scientific law; and if so to (b) clarify in simple lay persons language your legal mental disorder definition and scientific evidentiary basis for your legal ‘mental disorder’ definition.

Scientific laws are based on objective scientific empirical facts.
Scientific laws summarize and explain a large collection of facts determined by experiment, and are tested based on their ability to predict the results of future experiments. They are developed either from facts or through mathematics, and are strongly supported by empirical evidence. It is generally understood that they reflect causal relationships fundamental to reality, and are discovered rather than invented. Scientific laws apply to individuals equally across cultures, races, religions, classes and genders.

Cultural law are based on subjective cultural norms and values.
Cultural laws refer to shared cultural or sub-cultural values, attitudes, standards, and beliefs that characterize members of a particular racial, religious, class, gender or professional culture and define their cultural frame of orientation and object of devotion. In a human mental disorder context, cultural laws refer to the idea, values, attitudes and opinions people in a racial, religious, class, gender or ideological cultural group hold with regard to ‘normal’ vs ‘abnormal’ conformity to their cultural or sub-cultural law values. In a fully informed consent multi-cultural community, society or nation, a cultural groups laws apply only to the individuals who have consented to the particular cultural groups cultural values.

Summary Applicants and Respondents Info:

I am the applicant, a member of an Ecology of Peace culture [EoP Oath PDF], a culture based upon scientific resource conflict problem solving; that advocates on behalf of implementing EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law.

I am a qualified paralegal and yacht sailing captain. I have no qualifications as a psychologist or psychiatrist. I do have thousands of hours of psychotherapy experience as an employee and colleague of Fritz Perls Gestalt trained psychologist: Dr. Brad Blanton, founder of Radical Honesty [Radical Honesty: 01:02:03; SHO: And Nothing but the Truth: Brad Blanton; Radical Honesty Channel: The Importance of Telling the Radical Truth] and Jacob Moreno psychodrama trained psychologist Dr Richard Korn [SF Gate: Richard R Korn; Time: Prisons; SNAC: Richard Korn], a co-founder with John Maher of Delancey Street Foundation [SQ: John Maher of Delancey Street: A Guide for Peaceful Revolution in America]. I worked with Dr. Korn on prison reform cases and subsequent thereto with Dr. Blanton on Radical Honesty cases, for about ten years. I was officially employed by Dr. Blanton, and barter exchange employed by Dr. Korn. The EoP Amicus submitted to the Concourt in the case of The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm.tygae.org.za], with consent from Concourt Judges, was on behalf of my then cultural membership of the Radical Honesty culture.

The EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War Pro Se Amicus submitted – with consent from SA Concourt Justices [PDF] – to the South African Constitutional Court in CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm.tygae.org.za] argued that South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was negligent and/or a fraud, denying both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict.
» IG: 17-06-02_eoptrc-citizenv-mcbride; EoP Leg Sub: 12 Jun: IAEA & UNODA: DRAFT: Consent to Ecology of Peace CVID – weapons & power – Denuclearization Definition.

The respondents are family members, who are not psychologists or psychiatrists. I don’t know the number of hours any respondent has spent in voluntary existential self analysis therapy; if any.

A transcript copy of all Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation negotiations informal and formal legal correspondence is documented at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]: Correspondence [eop-leg-sub-corr.tygae.org.za].

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson,
Pro Se, EoP Applicant [EoP Oath PDF]

Sent per electronic notice to:

George Psychologists:
Mari-Luisa Becker (info@mari-luisa.co.za); Christie Els (cels@tekel.co.za); Hetta van Niekerk (pivan@xsinet.co.za); HJ Stander (wiltshire.hanjo21@gmail.com); Carien Brown (carien@carienbrown.co.za); JA Moll (jamoll.psych@gmail.com); Tjaart van der Walt (tspvdw@absamail.co.za); Tjaart van der Walt (tvdw321@gmail.com); Estelle Crause Contact Form; Randall Raubenheimer (randall.rfr@gmail.com); CS Hattingh (callie@intekom.co.za); Jeanne Fourie-Hattingh (jeanne.fourie@gmail.com); CB Buchner (b.buchner@absamail.co.za)

.

—————————————————-
Pub: 15 Apr: EoP Req for Psych Doctrine Info to HPCSA & PsySSA.
From: Lara Johnson <eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:30:45 +0200
Subject: Req for Psych Doctrine Info
Attachment: 19-04-15_ReqCInfo.pdf; 19-04-15_ReqPInfo.pdf

President Kgosi Letlape
CEO: Dr Manyangane Raymond Billa
Health Professions Council of South Africa
553 cn Hamilton & Madiba Streets, Arcadia, Pretoria, 0002
P O Box 205, Pretoria, 0001
Tel: 012 338 9300

President Helen Dunbar-Krige
PsySSA: Psychological Society of South Africa
P.O. Box 989, Houghton, 2041
Oakhurst Office Park, N Wing, Grd Floor, 13 St Andrews Road, Parktown, 2193
Tel: 011-486 3322

HPCSA: Kgosi Letlape & PsySSA: Helen Dunbar-Krige:

Req for Psych Doctrine Info.

I currently have two applications in the George High Court: Case H 51/19: LJ v GHJ et al [lj-v-ghj.tygae.org.za] and H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC [lj-v-crlrc.tygae.org.za], which include intersections between psychology doctrine and culture; as documented in attached excerpts of Request for Cultural and Psych Information Statements of Claim.

Summarizing: One of the ‘questions of law’ between applicants and respondents:

Are South African psychologists legal definitions of a mental disorder consciously or unconsciously based upon scientific law or cultural law; if cultural law: what are HPCSA / PsySSA’s reasonable professional cultural ethics policies to avoid cultures with different subjective cultural consent as to ‘normal behaviour’ cultural values from making erroneous negligent and/or malicious mental disorder allegations against individuals from other cultures, for not following their own cultural ‘normal’ norms and values.

Questions for HPCSA / PsySSA:

[1] Does PsySSA/HPCSA have an official policy as to whether PsySSA/HPCSA psychology doctrine legal definition of a mental disorder is based upon scientific law or cultural?

Scientific laws are based on objective scientific empirical facts.
Scientific laws summarize and explain a large collection of facts determined by experiment, and are tested based on their ability to predict the results of future experiments. They are developed either from facts or through mathematics, and are strongly supported by empirical evidence. It is generally understood that they reflect causal relationships fundamental to reality, and are discovered rather than invented. Scientific laws apply to individuals equally across cultures, races, religions, classes and genders.

Cultural law are based on subjective cultural norms and values.
Cultural laws refer to shared cultural or sub-cultural values, attitudes, standards, and beliefs that characterize members of a particular racial, religious, class, gender or professional culture and define their cultural frame of orientation and object of devotion. In a human mental disorder context, cultural laws refer to the idea, values, attitudes and opinions people in a racial, religious, class, gender or ideological cultural group hold with regard to ‘normal’ vs ‘abnormal’ conformity to their cultural or sub-cultural law values. In a fully informed consent multi-cultural community, society or nation, a cultural groups laws apply only to the individuals who have consented to the particular cultural groups cultural values.

[2] If so: Is PsySSA/HPCSA official psychology doctrine legal definition of a mental disorder based upon scientific or cultural law?

[3] If PsySSA/HPCSA official psychology doctrine legal definition of a mental disorder is based upon scientific law. Please clarify PsySSA/HPCSA legal mental disorder definition and scientific basis for legal definition.

[4] If PsySSA/HPCSA official psychology doctrine legal definition of a mental disorder is based upon cultural conformity law: What are PsySSA/HPCSA’s cultural ethics policies to avoid cultures with different subjective cultural consent as to ‘normal behaviour’ cultural values from making erroneous negligent and/or malicious mental disorder allegations against individuals from other cultures, for not following their own cultural ‘normal’ norms and values?

A copy of this correspondence is documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za].

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson,
Pro Se, EoP Applicant [EoP Oath PDF]

Sent per electronic notice to:

HPCSA: Kgosi Letlape:
HPCSA: Kgosi Letlape (info@hpcsa.co.za); Hilda Baloyi (Hildab@hpcsa.co.za); Eric Mphaphuli (ericm@hpcsa.co.za); Daphne Chuma (daphneyc@hpcsa.co.za); Priscilla Sekhonyana (priscillas@hpcsa.co.za)

PsySSA: Helen Dunbar-Krige:
PsySSA: Psychological Society of South Africa (info@psyssa.com); Helen Dunbar-Krige (helenk@uj.ac.za); Garth Stevens (Garth.Stevens@wits.ac.za); Tholene Sodi (info@sodiandpartners.co.za); PsySSA: Comm & Social Psych: Ronelle Carolissen (rlc2@sun.ac.za); Suntosh Pillay (suntoshpillay@gmail.com); Maretha Visser (maretha.visser@up.ac.za); Avivit Cherrington (avivit.cherrington@mandela.ac.za); Curwyn Mapaling (curwyn.mapaling@mandela.ac.za); San-Marie Aucamp (sanmarie@mweb.co.za); Mercy Tshilidzi Mashamaba (Tshilidzi.Mashamba@univen.ac.za); Boitumelo Diale (tumid@uj.ac.za); Umesh Bawa (ubawa@uwc.ac.za); Saths Cooper via Conquest for Life (info@conquest.org.za); Hannetjie van Zyl (han@emlct.com); Candice McCain (mccain@ukzn.ac.za); Exec Dir: Fateema Seedat (fatima@psyssa.com)

.

Sent via Contact Form:

Sent: 18 Apr 2019: 12:02 hrs: Estelle Crause Contact Form.

Excerpt of Request for Psych Info to George Psychologists:

Please email me asap if you are a George based psychologist who is willing to confirm in an under oath affidavit for a George High Court case; that (a) your legal definition of a mental disorder is based upon scientific law; and if so to (b) clarify in simple lay persons language your legal mental disorder definition and scientific evidentiary basis for your legal ‘mental disorder’ definition.

Full correspondence at: http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2019/04/17-apr-mlbecker/

.