* Frode Moe, Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys, Desere Barnard, Rachel Hannies, Graeme Johnstone, Hilary Johnstone, Millers Inc, Arno Crous, Talitha Moe
* 29 Apr: H51/19:LJ v GHJ: Draft: Q of Law: Expert Witness Statement of Consent Affidavit.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub / EoP ADR: LJ v GH Johnstone, LJ v Frode Moe / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Psych / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: Lara Johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:42:49 +0200
Subject: H51/19:LJ v GHJ: Draft: Q of Law: Expert Witness Statement of Consent Affidavit
To: Frode Moe <email@example.com>, “Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard”
<firstname.lastname@example.org>, Rachel Hannies <email@example.com>, Graeme Johnstone <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Hilary Johnstone <email@example.com>, “Millers Inc: Arno Crous” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Talitha Moe <email@example.com>
TO: Pro Se: Frode Moe (firstname.lastname@example.org);
TO: Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard
(email@example.com); Rachel Hannies (firstname.lastname@example.org); Counsel for Respondents: Graeme Johnstone (email@example.com); Hilary Johnstone (firstname.lastname@example.org);
TO: Millers Inc: Arno Crous (email@example.com); Counsel for: Talitha Moe (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Re: Wired: Inside the Battle to Define Mental Illness.
Frode Moe, Desere Barnard, Arno Crous:
H51/19:LJ v GHJ: Draft: Q of Law: Expert Witness Statement of Consent Affidavit.
Written Statement of Consent by [psychologist / psychiatrist] expert witness on Question of Law: [South African / Norway / USA / International] professional [psychology/psychiatry] organizations [SA: HPCSA / PsySSA / SASOP; NO: NPF; USA: APA; Intnl: WPA / IUPSYS]’s mental disorder legal definition is based upon [scientific / cultural] law.
I will publically submit to psychologists / psychiatrists I know or don’t know, with a request for such psychologist / psychiatrists on the record expert witness affidavit statement/s; enabling a more in depth legal enquiry into the question of law issue in dispute.
You [Respondents and Counsel] can edit the draft or not prior to (a) privately submitting it to psychologists / psychiatrists you know or don’t know to enable you to make a more fully informed decision as to how you wish to proceed; or (b) publically submitting it to psychologists / psychiatrists you know or don’t know, with a request for such psychologist / psychiatrist on the record expert witness statement; enabling a more in depth legal enquiry into the question of law issue in dispute.
A copy of this correspondence is documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]: LJ v GH Johnstone et al [lj-v-ghj.tygae.org.za].
Pro Se, EoP Applicant [EoP Oath PDF]