* Stan McChrystal, McChrystal Group, Chris Fussell, Cherylanne Anderson, Annie McChrystal
* 15 Jun: Req for Info: Re Stan McChrystal: EoP Applicant status.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Applicants | EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: Lara Johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 18:30:08 +0200
Subject: Req for Info: Re Stan McChrystal: EoP Applicant status.
To: Stan McChrystal <email@example.com>
Cc: McChrystal Group <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Chris Fussell <Chris.Fussell@mcchrystalgroup.com>, Cherylanne Anderson <email@example.com>, Annie McChrystal <firstname.lastname@example.org>
TO: Stan McChrystal
CC: Annie McChrystal, McChrystal Group
Req for Info: Re Stan McChrystal: EoP Applicant status.
As noted in EoP correspondence to suggested EoP NTE GMA cabinet [12 Jun: EoP Upd: EoP NTE GMA Cabinet: Stan McChrystal: EoP & WiP; or WiP Only?] I don’t know how to interpret your removal requests [02 Jun: Stan McChrystal Re: LJ v LS: Req for Info: Alastair Campbell: WiP Media Spokesperson; 02 Jun: Stan McChrystal #2: Re: LJ v LS: Req for Info: Alastair Campbell: WiP Media Spokesperson].
I know what my strategic goals are. I don’t know what any other person’s strategic goals are. I can only draw working hypothesis conclusions as to what their strategic goals are based upon my listening to their verbal statements, reading their written statements, observing their actions of commission and omission viz a viz their verbal and written statements as to their alleged strategic goals, and consideration of their answers to my questions; if or when they consider me as someone whose questions they are willing to answer.
EoP strategic goals are documented in LJ v LS [lj-v-ls]: EoP UN Resolution. If you share EoP strategic goals, and want to be an EoP Applicant, great. If so: Ego literate [ego-eco-literacy] feedback and/or constructive criticism towards accomplishing our EoP strategic goals are very welcome, the greater the clarity of the constructive criticism, no matter how offensive or politically incorrect, the Keep it Simple Stupid better.
If you do not share EoP strategic goals and want to be removed as an EoP Applicant, not a problem, you are not obliged to be an EoP Applicant. If so, please respond as follows within the next twenty four hours:
‘Please remove me as an EoP Applicant.’
If so: In addition to removing you as an EoP Applicant, as I did after your 02 June 2019 requests; I will remove you from EoP NTE GMA cabinet [eop-nte-gma-cabinet], and transfer you to Former EoP NTE GMA cabinet.
If you do not request to be removed as an EoP Applicant within the next 24 hours, I shall transfer you from Former EoP Applicants to Current EoP Applicants.
A copy of this correspondence is documented at EoP Legal Submissions: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu [lj-v-ls.tygae.org.za]
Pro Se, EoP Applicant [EoP Oath PDF]
Sent per electronic notice to:
Stan McChrystal, McChrystal Group:
Stan McChrystal (email@example.com); McChrystal Group (firstname.lastname@example.org); Chris Fussell (Chris.Fussell@mcchrystalgroup.com); Cherylanne Anderson (email@example.com); Annie McChrystal (firstname.lastname@example.org)