* DP Bezuidenhout Attorneys, Dawie Bezuidenhout, Rauch Gertenbach Attorneys, Van Niekerk Steyn, Gerstner Attorneys Inc, Sunette Joubert, Tanya Hugo, Lombard Kotze Inc, Freddie Lombard, Haycock Attorneys, Niel Haycock, NJL Attorneys Inc, Melissa Medea, George Herald, Ilse Schoonraad, JS Marais Inc, Charl Marais, Cape Party, Jack Miller, VVK, Chantal Kruger, Orania, Carel Boshoff, Orania Beweging, UDM, Bantu Holomisa, SGC: Socialist Green Coalition, Trevor Ngwane
* 22 Jun: LJ A’s to DB Q’s: Re: EoP Req for Info: In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v Graeme Johnstone, LJ v CRL Rights Comm, LJ v FW de Klerk, LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu, LJ v SANEF, EoP v George Herald, EoP v SA High Schools, LJ v SA Political Parties / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: Lara Johnson <email@example.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 15:36:06 +0200
Subject: LJ A’s to DB Q’s: Re: EoP Req for Info: In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel
To: “DP Bezuidenhout Attorneys: Dawie Bezuidenhout” <firstname.lastname@example.org>
* Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 15:37:59 +0200
Subject: LJ A’s to DB Q’s: Re: EoP Req for Info: In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel
To: “Rauch Gertenbach Attorneys: Van Niekerk Steyn” <email@example.com>, “Gerstner Attorneys Inc: Sunette Joubert and Tanya Hugo” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Lombard Kotze Inc: Freddie Lombard” <email@example.com>, “Haycock Attorneys: Niel Haycock” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “NJL Attorneys Inc: Melissa Medea” <email@example.com>,
“Chimes van Wyk Inc: Adele van Wyk” <firstname.lastname@example.org>Message-ID: <email@example.com>
* Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 15:40:31 +0200
Subject: 17/19: LJ v FWdK; CAS 572-02: State v LJ: Media’s Role in Censorship of Root WiP Intnl Law causes of resource conflict
To: Deon Joubert <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Ilse Schoonraad <email@example.com>, George Herald <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Counsel: JS Marais Inc: Charl Marais” <email@example.com>, Elizma Barnard <firstname.lastname@example.org>
* Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 15:45:39 +0200
Subject: EoP UN Resolution: Re: Racial, Religious, Ideological, etc Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands
To: Cape Party <email@example.com>, Jack Miller <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Media Relations <email@example.com>, “VVK: Chantal Kruger” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, VVK <email@example.com>, “Orania: Carel Boshoff” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Orania <email@example.com>, Orania Beweging <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Frans de Klerk <email@example.com>,
James <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Melissa <email@example.com>, Gawie <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Orania Volkskool <email@example.com>, Anje Boshoff <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Sanet Buitendag <email@example.com>, Sybella Taljaard <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Driekie de Jongh <email@example.com>, Antoinette Snyman <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Milandi Malan <email@example.com>, UDM <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Bantu Holomisa <email@example.com>, Bongani Phenyane <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “SGC: Socialist Green Coalition: Trevor Ngwane” <email@example.com>, Durban SGC <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 15:53:46 +0200
From: Lara Johnson <email@example.com>
“Chimes van Wyk Inc: Adele van Wyk” <firstname.lastname@example.org>Subject: LJ A’s to DB Q’s: Re: EoP Req for Info: In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel
* Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 16:44:13 +0200
Subject: LJ A’s to DB Q’s: Re: EoP Req for Info: In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel
To: “DP Bezuidenhout Attorneys: Dawie Bezuidenhout” <email@example.com>
Attachment: 10-05-18_CCT23-10_Consent-Brad-Blanton-PhD_Signed.pdf; 09-12-02_BlantonB-Affd-Nuremberg-Principles-Responsibility_Signed.pdf
TO: DP Bezuidenhout Attorneys: Dawie Bezuidenhout
CC: Rauch Gertenbach Attorneys: Van Niekerk Steyn, Gerstner Attorneys Inc: Sunette Joubert and Tanya Hugo, Lombard Kotze Inc: Freddie Lombard, Haycock Attorneys: Niel Haycock, NJL Attorneys Inc: Melissa Medea, Chimes van Wyk Inc: Adele van Wyk.
Re: 21 Jun: Req for Info: Ecology of Peace culture In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel.
CC: Ilse Schoonraad, George Herald, Counsel: JS Marais Inc: Charl Marais:
Re: CAS 572-02: State v L Johnson; 517/19: LJ v FW de Klerk & 10 Others; Media’s Role in Censorship of Root WiP Intnl Law causes of resource conflict.
CC: Cape Party: Jack Miller, VVK: Chantal Kruger, Orania: Carel Boshof, UDM Bantu Holomisa, SGC: Trevor Ngwane:
Re: 18 Jun: EoP SciCult Law Racial, Religious, Ideological, etc Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands.
LJ A’s to DB Q’s: Re: EoP Req for Info: In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel.
Thank you for your questions and our conversation on 21 Jun 2019, when I delivered EoP culture request for In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel correspondence [21 Jun: Req for Info: Ecology of Peace culture In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel: DP Bezuidenhout Attorneys: Dawie Bezuidenhout: PDF] to your office.
Herewith more detailed answers to questions you asked during our conversation on 21 Jun 2019, including possibly relevant – depending on your legal definition of relevant – related observations.
If you have any additional questions to enable you to make a fully informed decision; please let me know; no matter how racial, religious, cultural, gender or ideological politically incorrect. As noted in correspondence to New Zealand police [18 Mar: EoP Re NZ Police Req to Kiwifarms re 15 Mar Christchurch Mosque attack] and response [04 Jun: LJ Re: Arno Crous re: H 51/19: Set Down Clarity] to Arno Crous [04 Jun: Arno Crous re: H 51/19: Set Down Clarity] I do not require someone to hire the services of a Sheriff to get me to answer their questions objectively and subjectively honestly and sincerely in writing.
* Re: South African Law Re: Onus of Proof in Case of Necessity is on the State
* Re: Media’s Role in Censorship of Root WiP Intnl Law causes of resource conflict.
* Re: DSM Mental Disorder Diagnosis: Scientific or Cultural Law
* Re: EoP Scientific and Cultural International Law: EoP Cultural Law Rights and Duties for Individuals who want to live in Racial, Religious and Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands
* EoP Obs possibly relevant to 21 Jun: Req for Info: Ecology of Peace culture In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel.
Re: South African Law Re: Onus of Proof in Case of Necessity is on the State:
Regarding my 2002 bombthreat to the PW Botha airport via the George Herald. I instructed my Legal Aid appointed attorneys: Anton Marx and Oliff DOliviera to plead to necessity, but they refused to do so and withdrew, whereupon I represented myself.
My understanding that South African law places the onus of proof in a defence of necessity on the State to rule out the reasonable possibility of an act of necessity, is documented in this Affidavit Summary of CAS 572-01: State v Lara Johnstone: 18 June 2002 Political and Military Necessity Iatrogenic origins of AIDS bomb threat to the P.W. Botha Airport trial [PDF], a transparency copy of which was provided to US and Russian military and civilian prosecutorial officials, since the evidentiary documentation I submitted to the court, included American and Russian military scientists negligent and/or intentional involvement in the creation of AIDS [Leonard Horowitz: Emerging Viruses, Aids and Ebola: Nature, Accident or Intentional?; Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism and Toxic Warfare; Boyd Graves: State Origin: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS; Alan Cantwell: AIDS and the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic].
[120.1] S v Pretorius 1975 (2) SA 85 (SWA) “There can be no doubt that our law recognises the defence of necessity”: In S v Pretorius, an important case in South African criminal law, the accused had exceeded the speed limit when taking his child, whom he sincerely subjectively believed to be in mortal danger, to hospital for treatment.
[120.2] The accused who had no legal representation, referred, despite his plea of guilty, to circumstances which materially gave rise to the defence of necessity. This defence made it necessary for the magistrate to decide in the first instance not what the accused’s frame of mind had been, but whether necessity was present and whether it justified the accused’s conduct. ..
[120.3] The court held that the onus of proof in a defence of necessity, as in self-defence, rests on the State, which must rule out the reasonable possibility of an act of necessity. It is not for the accused to satisfy the court that he acted from necessity. If the State fails to rule out the reasonable possibility of an act of necessity; then conviction must be set aside. The conviction of Pretorius was accordingly set aside.
[120.4] The onus of proof in a defence of necessity as in self-defence rests on the State to rule out the reasonable possibility of an act of necessity. It is not for the accused to satisfy the court that she acted from necessity (p 293).
[120.5] [The judgement illustrates a case in which the accused’s act, committed in a situation of necessity, was not directed at somebody else’s or that person’s interests, but merely amounted to an infringement of a legal provision.]
» EoP Leg Sub: 31 Dec: Transparency Copy to NPA WC & HQ, CC: US & RU Attorney General, of Affid ref to Irregular & Illegal Actions of NPA et al in George Case CAS 572-02: BB: Affidavit of Lara Johnstone: Summary of CAS 572-01: State v Lara Johnstone: 18 June 2002 Political and Military Necessity Iatrogenic origins of AIDS bomb threat to the P.W. Botha Airport trial [PDF].
Excluding the George Herald’s article disclosing their rage and anger about a bomb threat which had been made to the PW Botha airport via their offices; the George Herald Editor totally ignored the trial – even though George Herald employees testified during the court proceedings – refusing to disclose the reasons why the individual made the bomb threat via the George Herald offices.
Re: Media’s Role in Censorship of Root WiP Intnl Law causes of resource conflict.
The bomb threat I made to the PW Airport on 18 June 2002, was made via the offices of the George Herald, because:
My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not park his Ryder truck at the New York Times. – Ann Coulter: NY Times Better Dead than Read.
Mainstream Media: Chief Cheerleaders for Overpopulation/Consumption Ecological Overshoot resulting in Racial, Religious, Class and Gender Resource Conflict.
The Ehrlichs and Howell seem to assume that education is the chief factor driving public opinion about environmental causality. But in Tradeoffs: Imperatives of Choice in a High-Tech World, Wenk (1986) offered a more media-centric view of how the public learns: “Whatever literacy in science and technology the general public has reached is not from formal education. Rather, it is from the mass media. That responsibility of the press has been almost completely ignored” (p. 162).
This study will examine press responsibility for the public’s indifference to population growth by exploring two questions: * To what extent do press reports about population-driven environmental problems link those problems to population growth? * What reasons do reporters give for ignoring population growth in stories about environmental problems?
While it is well known that environmental experts connect environmental degradation to population growth, it is less well known that land developers are equally straightforward in implicating population growth as a causal agent for turning wildlife habitat and farmland into subdivisions. The how-to manuals for real estate development are very explicit about the critical role of population growth. Naturally, they frame the results with different language: what land developers might call conversion of raw land to happy communities is often the same phenomenon that environmentalists would call loss of critical wildlife habitat. But both environmentalists and developers agree that population growth is a chief force driving the process of land conversion. Land conversion, in turn, is frequently associated with species decline and urban sprawl.
As we have seen, both land development economists and environmental experts acknowledge population growth as a key source of environmental change. But journalists frame environmental causality differently.
Why? Communication theory offers several possibilities. First is the hegemony-theory interpretation: reports omit any implication that population growth might produce negative effects, in order to purvey the ideology of elites who make money from population growth. As Molotch and Lester (1974) put it, media content can be viewed as reflecting “the practices of those having the power to determine the experience of others” (p. 120). Since real estate, construction and banking interests directly support the media through advertising purchases, this interpretation seems plausible. A number of media critics (e.g., Gandy, 1982; Altschull, 1984; Bennett, 1988) have suggested that media messages reflect the values of powerful political and commercial interests. Burd (1972), Kaniss (1991) and others have pointed out that newspapers have traditionally promoted population growth in their cities through civic boosterism. Molotch (1976) even suggested that cities can best be understood as entities competing for population growth, with the city newspaper as chief cheerleader.
– Minnesotans for Sustainability: T Michael Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population – Environment Connection [SQ Copy]
Prof Michael Maher submitted an Affidavit [Written Statement by Consent of T. Michael Maher, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness for How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection and Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue: PDF] in support of EoP Amicus to the Concourt Case: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm] confirming his consent to be an expert witness regarding media’s role of censorship of the root – overpopulation and consumption – causes of resource conflict.
The George Herald were aware of the EoP Amicus to the Concourt, and Prof Michael Maher and Dr. Brad Blanton’s affidavits in support [See below: Unresolved Legal Status of Dr Brad Blanton Affidavits].
EoP Radical Honoursty Ethics recommendations to South African and International Media Publications [30 Jul: Ted Keller: Draft: Marshall Pledge: EoP RH FR Ethics Control of Media; 03 Aug: Responsible Freedom Silver Bullet Journalism Education solution; 25 May: EoP Re: CNN: Jake Tapper: I favour disclosure of all info. Release the stuff; 30 May: EoP Re: RSF: French Intel Agency summons eight journalists for questioning; 30 May: EoP Re: RSF calls for UN Rep to protect journalists from Press Freedom Predators] to inform their readers of the root causes of any resource conflict story they report on.
All media – print, radio and/or television – publications with a reader/viewer/listener ship of more than 200 readers/viewers/listeners – if or when reporting on any resource conflict – whether economic, military, political etc – story; are to include the following paragraph in such story; for their readers/viewers/listeners.
Earth is not flat. Resources are finite. When beings breed and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource depletion, ecological overshoot and resource conflict. All local, national and international military, political, economic racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict are consequences of – ecologically illiterate right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits – clauses of international law.
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Jul: Ted Keller: Draft: Marshall Pledge: EoP RH FR Ethics Control of Media.
George Herald and LJ v FW de Klerk and 10 Others:
Another case I filed, but did not mention in correspondence with you is a case in the George Magistrates Court: 517/19: LJ v FW de Klerk [lj-v-fwdk], which includes media respondents: George Herald and SANEF. The respondents were requested to engage in a Court Annexed Mediation Enquiry truthseeking enquiry to ascertain the accuracy or inaccuracy of the EoP ‘sincere peacenik’ legal definition, and if accurate and they were sincere peaceniks, to file their Ecology of Peace Policy Statements [eop-policy-stmnt] Oaths [eop-axis-oath]. None of the respondents were voluntarily interested. The application has not been served on the respondents by the Sheriff.
Re: DSM Mental Disorder Diagnosis: Scientific or Cultural Law:
My Question of Law Answer affidavit submitted to LJ v Graeme Johnstone respondents:
Applicant Question of Law Affidavit [PDF]
Questions: [A] Is a mental disorder diagnosis, based on any DSM – APA: American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic & Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – Bible’s mental disorder legal definition; based upon scientific or cultural law? [B] If cultural law: what are cultural ethics values to avoid negligent and/or malicious cross-cultural ‘mental disorder’ allegations.
Applicant Ecology of Peace Culture Answers: [A] Any mental disorder diagnosis, based on any DSM – APA: American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-1, DSM-2, DSM-3, DSM-4 or DSM-5 – Bible’s mental disorder legal definition; is based upon cultural law. [B] Cultural ethics should require cultures with cultural law mental disorder definitions to educate their cultural members, that such definitions are not based on scientific law, but cultural conformity law, and in a fully informed consent multi-cultural community, society or nation, cultural laws apply only to the individuals who have consented to the particular cultural groups cultural values.
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 May: Court Filings with George High Court Registrar.
Re: Your Question: Have I contacted psychologists, psychiatrists and psych associations and what has been there response?.
My EoP correspondence to George psychologists and South African, American, EU and international psychology and psychiatric associations requesting their response to the aforementioned Question of law: Is DSM diagnosis based on scientific or cultural law [15 Apr: EoP Req for Psych Doctrine Info to HPCSA & PsySSA; 16 Apr: H 45/51-19: LJ v CRLRC/GHJ: Re: Q of Law to HPCSA/PsySSA; 17 Apr: Req for Psych Info to George Psychologists; 27 Apr: EoP Q’s Re: SASOP position statement 9 on Culture, Mental Health and Psychiatry; 28 Apr: LJ Re: CB Buchner: RE: Req for Psych Info to George Psychologists]
As of date the LJ v GHJ respondents have not indicated that they know of, or have found a psychologist or psychiatrist who is willing to submit an Affidavit that asserts that a DSM diagnosis is based on scientific law.
Disclosure Notice: Unresolved Legal Status of Dr Brad Blanton Affidavits:
My aforementioned Question of Law affidavit, includes reference to my former employment with American psychologist Dr. Brad Blanton, the founder of Radical Honesty [Radical Honesty: 01:02:03; SHO: And Nothing but the Truth: Brad Blanton; Radical Honesty Channel: The Importance of Telling the Radical Truth] Enterprises [radicalhonesty.com].
Dr Blanton has submitted two affidavits to South African courts on my behalf, but then in a state of anger – subsequent to my support for a free and fair treason trial for Anders Breivik [02 Jul: Anders Breivik: Thank you: PDF], equivalent to the free and fair treason trial provided to Nelson Mandela by the Apartheid government – informed me he intended to notify the SA courts to disown his former affiliation with me, which he has not yet done, but he also has not withdrawn his statements or indicated his willingness to practice his radical honesty to get over his anger:
* 02 Dec 2009: Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’; submitted into the High Court, Western Cape, Case # 19963-09, Application for Review, of conviction of Lara Johnstone, of the Radical Honesty culture and religion, on the charge of ‘crimen injuria’. [PDF Enclosed]
* 18 May 2010: Written Statement by Consent of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness to: Practicing Radical Honesty and Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness; and Paradigms and Contexts: The Revolution of Consciousness [PDF Enclosed], submitted to SA Constitutional Court in CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm] by Lara Johnson; and withdrawn by Lara Johnson [PDF], subsequent to Brad Blanton email to Lara Johnson on 27 July 2011: “I will put out a global fucking disownership of your horseshit and withdraw every fucking support ever given you” and 29 July 2011: “I will be writing the S. Africa court to disown any affiliation with you”. [26 Jul: Radical Honesty Coaching Blog Discussion: Re: Norway v. Breivik/Berwick: Application to Chief Justice Tore Schei ITO Article 85: Treason].
Question: Could you clarify where you currently stand with regard to your statements in the aforementioned Affidavits, and your subsequent statements renouncing any affiliation with me. Do you intend to contact SA courts to renounce your affiliation with me, and if so, by when do you intend to do so. If not, do you intend to honour your affiliation with me, by practicing what you ‘radical honesty forgiveness’ preach, and if so, by when do you intend to do so?
» EoP Leg Sub: 17 Jun: LJ v LS Req for Info#2: Brad Blanton & Radical Honesty Trainers;
Copies of Dr Blantons affidavits were submitted to LJ v Graeme Johnstone et al counsel: Millers Inc: Arno Crous and Brand van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard, and their clients:
If you – Frode Moe, Talitha Moe, Graeme Johnstone, Hilary Johnstone – would like Brad Blanton to clarify where he currently stands with regard to his statements in the aforementioned Affidavits, and his subsequent statements renouncing any affiliation with me; i.e. whether he intends to contact SA courts to renounce his affiliation with me, and if so, by when he intends to do so; or whether Brad intends to honour his affiliation with me, by practicing what he ‘radical honesty forgiveness’ preaches, and if so, by when he intends to do so?
Please clarify your preference to Brad Blanton in writing Pro Se personally or per instructions to your lawyers, for them to clarify your win-win truthseeking or zero-sum win-lose preferences in writing to Brad Blanton on your behalf.
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Jun: LJ v GHJ Copy of BB Affid’s ref in LJ v LS Req for Info#2: Brad Blanton & Radical Honesty Trainers.
Re: EoP Scientific and Cultural International Law: EoP Cultural Law Rights and Duties for Individuals who want to live in Racial, Religious and Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands:
Herewith a summary of the LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu application, and documents filed. As noted if EoP Scientific and Cultural law is implemented as international law, via EoP UN Resolution [eop-un-res], it includes a Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands – Racial / Religious / Gender Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands [cult-law-self-rule] – provision.
LJ v LS application has been filed with the High Court Registrar Case H 111/19 [16 May: Court Filings with George High Court Registrar].
Summary of Application Orders Requested:
An Order confirming Respondents – on behalf of their Head of State – Consent / Edit / Objection Response to:
[A] Authorize EoP PoW TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War Negotiations:
Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End Abel and Kane Cold War negotiations to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law; by process of EoP UN Resolution; to [A] enable responsible freedom orderly and humane – de-industrialization and depopulation, prisoner release, land reform and denuclearization – shut down of the WiP Ponzi Swamp economy; [B] require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; [C] nationalize all property and provide all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) with cultural law self rule for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration land reform to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.
[B] If EoP TRC: Authorize EoP UN Resolution:
Ecology of Peace recommended: [A] UN Security Council and General Assembly Resolution to Implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law; [B] Suggested Amendment to Crime of Aggression Definition of Rome Statute of International Criminal Court.
[C] If No EoP TRC: Authorize US v McVeigh Siberia PoW Suicide:
Logistics: (a) Respondent Lapenn on behalf of Respondent NSA: Gen Paul Nakasone and/or Timothy McVeigh’s NSA superior; authorizing the release of Timothy McVeigh to travel to South Africa and to Russia with applicant for their joint assisted suicide in Siberia; (b) Respondent Lapenn and Respondent Petrakov on behalf of Respondent NSA Dir Gen Paul Nakasone and Respondent FSB Dir Gen Alexander Bortnikov negotiating the authorized release of Timothy McVeigh to travel to South Africa and to Russia with applicant for their joint assisted suicide in Siberia; (c) Respondent Sisulu authorizing a visa for Timothy McVeigh to travel to Russia via South Africa; (d) Respondent Petrakov issuing a visa for Applicant and Timothy McVeigh to travel to Russia for their assisted suicide departure in unmarked graves in the Siberian wilderness.
EoP Axis UN Resolution to implement EoP SciCult law as Intl law Documents:
Request for Information: Consent / Edit / Object:
* EoP UN Resolution [PDF]; Amendment to Crime of Aggression Definition of Rome Statute of Intnl Criminal Court [PDF].
» Definitions / Summaries: Crime of Aggression [PDF]; Racial / Religious / Gender Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands [PDF]; Ego Literacy [PDF]; EoP Denuclearization [PDF]; EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [PDF]; EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [PDF]; EoP Footprint [PDF]; Land Reform [PDF]; One Child Law [PDF]; Prisoner Pardon [PDF]; Property Ration [PDF]; Responsible Freedom Oath [PDF]; Shut Down Swamp Economy [PDF].
* US v Tim McVeigh Siberia Assisted Suicide [PDF]
The respondents representatives have been notified by email that the LJ v LS documentation shall be served on them by the sheriff within the next few weeks [17 May: LJ v LSisulu Re: McVeigh OKC bombing TRC EoP UN Resolution]. President Bush has been notified of US v McVeigh Information request [20 May: LJ v LS: Req for Info: George W Bush & Gray Davis: Re US v TJ McVeigh]. EoP Applicants [eop-applicants] were offered opportunity to suggest edits [31 May: EoP Applicants: LJ v LS Edit Deadline: Sun 02 June 2019 24:00] before service by the Sheriff [10 Jun: LJ v LS: Registered Mail Posting of Sheriff Service Documentation].
Respondents via South African Gov Official / Embassy / High Comm / Member Representative:
* Cyril Ramaphosa: President of South Africa * Bill Gates: Founder of The Giving Pledge * Ueli Maurer: President of Switzerland, * António Guterres, UN Secretary General, * Xi Jinping: President of People’s Republic of China, * Jean-Claude Juncker: President European Commission, * Stuart Peach: Chairman: NATO: Military Committee, * Donald Trump: President of America, * Vladimir Putin: President of Russian Federation.
As noted in correspondence to Attorney General William Barr [29 May: LJ v LS Upd: Re: Req for Info: (i) Scientific Sincere Peacenik definition, (ii) McVeigh OKC Bomb Pardon: Paragraph: Peace Organizations: Re: Scientific sincere Peacenik definition] various South African and global ideologically left and right peace organizations have been informed that they can show their support for EoP – End Babylon Law Ecocide – UN Resolution by signing their organizational Ecology of Peace policy statement [eop-policy-stmnt]; to provide a mandate for any or all primary Heads of State respondents to authorize EoP UN Resolution, to be submitted to UN General Assembly.
EoP Obs possibly relevant to 21 Jun: Req for Info: Ecology of Peace culture In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel.
By coincidence or if not by coincidence; i.e. if psychotronically manipulated by military officials:
* 21 June 2019 letter delivered to George Lawyers [21 Jun: Req for Info: Ecology of Peace culture In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel] includes the following footnote: “For example: In the recent US v Ammon Bundy criminal case in Oregon USA; many of the Bundy defendants waived their right to ‘Representation of Counsel’; but accepted ‘Standby Counsel’.
* 21 June 2019: Dawie Bezuidenthout statement: Paraphrased: You know that case where a woman was handed a hot cup of coffee by a McDonalds Drive Through and spilt it on her lap and got a million dollar payout, will never happen under South African law.
* 21 June 2019: End of discussion with Dawie Bezuidenthout, I quoted John F Kennedy: Those who make non-violent revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable.
* 20 Jun: [20 Jun: WhoIsNotifications: Daily Domain Activity Report: mcveigh2020.com registered]
» McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020] Exploratory Committee Home page includes ‘If Gov and citizens do not cooperate to implement EoP SciCult law …. Gov’s & citizens are likely to end up in the There is No Tomorrow world where WiP ‘right to breed / consume’ intnl law is leading them: Failed States NTE climate change chaos, 509 Chernobyl terror targets ……’ where the word ‘target’ links to Viva La Revolucion: Jerry Wilson for Oregon Governor page: Checkmate: SQ Copy].
» McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020]: Exploratory Committee Home page and Wanted: Honest Americans page includes reference to TS Bennett: What a Way to Go: Life at the End of Empire documentary, which includes following re: McDonalds DriveThrough Nuclear Coke: “Chapter 2: What a Way to Go: There was a time in my life when I was having this recurring daydream. I’d be sitting in my car, radio blaring, slowly making my way forward through a fast food drive thru. I’d get to the window and they’d hand me my drink and my burger and fries. And as I waited for my change… off in the distance… a bright flash… and a rising cloud. And as the full force of the nuclear blast washed over me, as the icy cold of my overturned Coke seeped into my jeans, I’d think to myself… what a way to go.”
* 21 June 2019: Pacific North West – including Bundy Ranch militia – events in Oregon [Daily Beast: Armed Militias Pledge to Fight for Fugitive Oregon GOP Lawmakers ‘At Any Cost’; MSNBC: Rachel Maddow: Oregon Republican’s Violent Threat Draws Militia Support].
* 20 Jun: EoP correspondence to President Trump and Rouhani [20 Jun: EoP LJvLS Offer for Pres Trump: If Trump wants EoP honesty USvIR negotiations] included the recommendation that if ‘Trump wants EoP honesty USvIR negotiations’; he could send a good faith signal to Pres Rouhani by pardoning among others Oklahoma City bomber Michigan militia member: Terry Lynn Nichols.
A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za].
Pro Se, EoP Applicant [EoP Oath PDF]
Sent per electronic notice to:
Dawie Bezuidenhout and George Lawyers:
DP Bezuidenhout Attorneys: Dawie Bezuidenhout (firstname.lastname@example.org); Rauch Gertenbach Attorneys: Van Niekerk Steyn (email@example.com); Gerstner Attorneys Inc: Sunette Joubert and Tanya Hugo (firstname.lastname@example.org); Lombard Kotze Inc: Freddie Lombard (email@example.com); Haycock Attorneys: Niel Haycock (firstname.lastname@example.org); NJL Attorneys Inc: Melissa Medea (email@example.com); Chimes van Wyk Inc: Adele van Wyk (firstname.lastname@example.org)
George Herald: Ilse Schoonraad, Counsel: JS Marais Inc: Charl Marais:
Deon Joubert (email@example.com); Ilse Schoonraad (firstname.lastname@example.org); George Herald (email@example.com); Counsel: JS Marais Inc: Charl Marais (firstname.lastname@example.org); Elizma Barnard (email@example.com)
Cape Party: Jack Miller, VVK: Chantal Kruger, Orania: Carel Boshof, UDM Bantu Holomisa, SGC: Trevor Ngwane:
Cape Party (firstname.lastname@example.org); Jack Miller (email@example.com); Media Relations (firstname.lastname@example.org); VVK: Chantal Kruger (email@example.com); VVK (firstname.lastname@example.org); Orania: Carel Boshoff (email@example.com); Orania (firstname.lastname@example.org), Orania Beweging (email@example.com); Frans de Klerk (firstname.lastname@example.org);
James (email@example.com); Melissa (firstname.lastname@example.org); Gawie (email@example.com); Orania Volkskool (firstname.lastname@example.org); Anje Boshoff (email@example.com); Sanet Buitendag (firstname.lastname@example.org); Sybella Taljaard (email@example.com); Driekie de Jongh (firstname.lastname@example.org); Antoinette Snyman (email@example.com); Milandi Malan (firstname.lastname@example.org); UDM (email@example.com); Bantu Holomisa (firstname.lastname@example.org); Bongani Phenyane (email@example.com); SGC: Socialist Green Coalition: Trevor Ngwane (firstname.lastname@example.org); Durban SGC (email@example.com);