* Millers Inc, Arno Crous, Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys, Desere Barnard, Frode Moe, Talitha Moe, Graeme Johnstone, Hilary Johnstone
* 03 Jul: LJ Upd2 Re: A Crous re: H 51/19: Reply Affidavit & Set Down Clarity.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v Graeme Johnstone, LJ v Frode Moe / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Religion, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: Lara Johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2019 17:22:53 +0200
To: “Millers Inc: Arno Crous” <email@example.com>, “Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard: Rachel Hannies” <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Frode Moe <email@example.com>, Lee Moe <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Graeme Johnstone <email@example.com>, Hilary Johnstone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: LJ Upd2 Re: A Crous re: H 51/19: Reply Affidavit & Set Down Clarity
TO: Millers Inc: Arno Crous & Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard
CC: Frode Moe, Talitha Moe, Graeme Johnstone, Hilary Johnstone
Arno Crous & Desere Barnard:
LJ Upd2 Re: A Crous re: H 51/19: Reply Affidavit & Set Down Clarity.
03 July LJ Status Report Re:
* Legal Representation Written Requests to George Lawyers.
* H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC & One Other: EoP Culture & Legal Representation related issues in dispute:
Legal Representation Written Requests to George Lawyers.
As promised on 20 Jun [20 Jun: LJ Upd Re: A Crous re: H 51/19: Reply Affidavit & Set Down Clarity] I drafted letters to various lawyers in George, whom I had not contacted before, requesting a response by 02 July 2019, if they were willing to provide an Ecology of Peace culture client with standby counsel [21 Jun: Req for Info: Ecology of Peace culture In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel].
During hand delivery of the letters, Gerstner Attorneys Inc: Sunette Joubert & Tanya Hugo declined [PDF]. DP Bezuidenhout Attorneys: Dawie Bezuidenhout had an impromptu meeting with me to discuss my written request for representation where I verbally answered his questions, and subsequently provided him with more detailed written answers [22 Jun: LJ A’s to DB Q’s: Re: EoP Req for Info: In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel].
Rauch Gertenbach Attorneys: Van Niekerk Steyn responded to my written answers to Dawie Bezuidenhout with a ‘situated in Mosselbay’ excuse [24 Jun: VS Re: LJ A’s to DB Q’s: Re: EoP Req for Info: In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel] to which I responded with my interpretations requesting clarification whether his response should be interpreted as him being an EoP and WiP Clients lawyer, or a WiP Clients Only Lawyer [24 Jun: LJ Re: VS Re: EoP Req for Info: In Forma Pauperis Standby Counsel]. He has not further responded, indicating the possibility that he is a WiP clients only lawyer.
As of today 02 Jul 2019, none of the other attorneys have responded to the written requests hand delivered to their offices: Chimes van Wyk Inc: Andaleen Chimes & Adele van Wyk [PDF]; Haycock Attorneys: Niel Haycock [PDF]; Lombard Kotze Inc: Freddie Lombard & Chris Kotze [PDF]; NJL Attorneys Inc: Melissa Medea [PDF].
H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC & One Other: EoP Culture & Legal Representation related issues in dispute:
CRL Rights Commission: CEO: Tshimangadzo Edward Mafadza provided me with his Pro Se Notice to Oppose and Answering Affidavit [24 Jun: Maureen Chauke: H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC: CRL Rights Comm: Notice to Oppose, Answer Affid. Print & File Auth]. I confirmed receipt [24 Jun: LJ Re: MC Re: H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC: CRL Rights Comm: Notice to Oppose, Answer Affid. Print & File Auth] and as per his printing and filing authorization, printed and filed his Pro Se Answering Affidavit [25 Jun: H 45/19: Filing: Sheriff Svc & CRLRC Not to Oppose & Answering Affidavit] with the High Court Registrar. On 28 Jun I submitted a letter to CRLRC CEO: Tshimangadzo Edward Mafadza to enquire whether he would prefer a Settlement Agreement or ongoing Equality Court litigation questions about his Answering Affidavit [28 Jun: LJ Letter Re: H45/19: CRLRC: Eddie Mafadza Answering Affidavit]. As of date he has not answered.
On 27 Jun 2019 I received a letter [PDF] from Craig Lucas: Acting Head of the Western Cape Legal Practice Council’s Disciplinary Department [27 Jun: LPC-Craig Lucas: Letter Re H45/19: Filing: Sheriff Svc]. On 28 Jun 2019, I responded to Mr. Lucas letter [28 Jun: LJ re Legal Practice Council WC Craig Lucas Letter to H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC Court file]. As of date there has been no further response from Mr. Lucas.
Status of potentially available In Forma Pauperis Council Standby Counsel, available of their own voluntary decision making. None. Once the H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC application is heard, and the Judge makes a ruling on the culture and legal representation issues in dispute, that may possibly change lawyers willingness to provide EoP culture client standby counsel legal services.
I have been working on my Reply Affidavit; I hope to have it finished by 05 July 2019. If not, at most, a few days at most thereafter.
 Respondents Refuse to File Answering Affidavits
 Evidence Not Included in Applicants Founding Affidavit
 Formal Request for Inquisitorial Win-Win Truthseeking Juridical Dispute Resolution Problem Solving
[3.1] Referral to Court Annexed Mediation.
[A] If Declined: Confirm Respondents Fully Informed Consent: Formally Decline Resolution of dispute via Court Annexed Mediation.
[3.2] Final Request to File Answering Affidavits.
[A] If Declined: Confirm Respondents Fully Informed Consent: (a) Allegations Not Denied per Affidavit, will be Regarded as Having Been Admitted; (b) Failing to deal with the merits of an applicant’s claim in application proceedings based on some technical ground may have drastic consequences as a respondent may suffer an adverse order being granted without having fully exercised his/her right to be heard..
 If – Respondents Lawyers Request Dismissal without Having Addressing Merits – Required: Adversarial Lawfare Options:
[4.1] In Forma Pauperis Application for Standby Counsel
[4.2] Referral to Equality Court for Cultural Discrimination Enquiry.
A copy of this correspondence shall be documented at LJ v GH Johnstone [lj-v-ghj.tygae.org.za]
Pro Se, EoP Applicant [EoP Oath PDF]
Sent per electronic notice to:
Frode Moe, Talitha Moe:
Frode Moe (email@example.com); Lee Moe (firstname.lastname@example.org); Counsel: Millers Inc: Arno Crous (email@example.com);
Graeme Johnstone, Talitha Johnstone:
Graeme Johnstone (firstname.lastname@example.org); Hilary Johnstone (email@example.com); Counsel: Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard: Rachel Hannies (firstname.lastname@example.org)