30 Jul: EoP Re: RT: If Greta Thunberg worries about end of the world, why does she pose with status quo politicians?

* Igor Ogorodnev, Russia Today, Sebastian Ronin, Greta Thunberg, School Strike, Janine OKeefe, Fridays for Future, Extinction Rebellion, Roger Hallam, Bindmans, Mike Schwarz, Rupert Read, Greenhouse Thinktank, Jamie Kelsey-Fry, Jem Bendell, Rowan Williams, Alter Ego, Ronan Harrington
* 30 Jul: EoP Re: RT: If Greta Thunberg worries about end of the world, why does she pose with status quo politicians?
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v Greta Thunberg, EoP v Extinction Rebellion  / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMUK | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:48:21 +0200
Subject: EoP Re: RT: If Greta Thunberg worries about end of the world, why does she pose with status quo politicians?
To: Igor Ogorodnev via Russia Today <info@rttv.ru>, US Bureau <RT-US@rttv.ru>, Press Office <press@rttv.ru>, London Bureau <LondonBureau@rttv.ru>
Cc: Sebastian Ronin <novacadia@gmail.com>, Greta Thunberg <GretaThunbergMedia@gmail.com>, “School Strike: Janine OKeefe” <info@fores.se>, “Fridays for Future: International” <international.media@fridaysforfuture.org>, Media <swe.media@fridaysforfuture.org>, Extinction Rebellion <extinctionrebellion@risingup.org.uk>, Press <press@risingup.org.uk>, Roger Hallam <organics2go@googlemail.com>, “Counsel: Bindmans: Mike Schwarz” <m.schwarz@bindmans.com>, Rupert Read <r.read@uea.ac.uk>, Greenhouse Thinktank <info@greenhousethinktank.org>, Jamie Kelsey-Fry <jamiekelsey@gmail.com>, Jem Bendell <iflas@cumbria.ac.uk>, Rowan Williams <jeh34@cam.ac.uk>, “Alter Ego: Ronan Harrington” <ronan@alterego.network>
Message-ID: <181a67446f114119c5ae208528a5a2cc@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za

.

TO: Igor Ogorodnev via Russia Today:
CC: Greta Thunberg, School Strike:
CC: Extinction Rebellion, Roger Hallam, Farhana Yamin, Mike Schwarz et al:
Re: RT: If Greta Thunberg worries about end of the world, why does she pose with status quo politicians?, via Sebastian Ronin.

Igor Ogorodnev et al:

EoP Re: RT: If Greta Thunberg worries about end of the world, why does she pose with status quo politicians?

After nearly a year of her endless tour through parliaments and conferences, the climate activist must by now realize that she is little more than a feelgood photo op and an advert for train travel. Is Greta Thunberg OK with this? In France on Tuesday, the 16-year-old delivered her stenciled masterclass of rhetoric presented as stark plain-spokenness. ….. As always, she grabbed the newspaper headlines and 75,000 likes on the video she posted of her speech to her 800,000 Twitter followers, and later sat in the senate hall as it voted to ratify the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) despite objections from the Green Party that it will increase emissions and undermine existing environmental regulations. One MP called the vote “Greta or CETA?” to draw attention to the poignancy of the contrast between her speech and the actions that followed, but the treaty was passed with overwhelming support from Emmanuel Macron’s En Marche, and his personal endorsement. …. Maybe Thunberg is in on the whole con. But more likely she is fanatically sincere to the point of being easy to manipulate. Her true sympathies may lie with the street protests of Extinction Rebellion but tactically the teenager evidently believes that no red carpet is too dirty to walk on, no pulpit too greasy to hold on to while making a speech. The net result has been a traveling bourgeois dog-and-pony show of baseless self-congratulation. Daily features in the Guardian, Thunberg becoming the face of railway travel used for publicity by a Swedish train operator, releasing a single with the band 1975, who presumably plan to fulfill their tour dates before the end of 2019 in Ukraine, Dubai, Hong Kong, Australia, and the US exclusively through ground and water transport. The exalted Greta may not be comfortable with this, but she hasn’t shied away from it either, though her current public profile would allow her to criticize any powerful figure or corporation in the world, and still have her views front-paged. – RT: If Greta Thunberg worries about end of the world, why does she pose with status quo politicians?,

As far as I am aware, Greta did not put a gun to the heads any of the editors or journalists around the world who made editorial decisions to provide her with front page coverage and to unquestioningly endorse her legal representation of herself as an ‘environmentalist’; and a ‘scientific’ aka ‘truthseeking’ environmentalist..

Below are some questions Igor or any RT journalist or any mainstream media journalist in Russia or anywhere else in the world can use, when interviewing Greta and/or any activists or academics who claim to be peaceniks and/or environmentalists; to help the journalists to learn to distinguish between a conscious and/or unconscious sincere peacenik / environmentalist activist; and a conscious or unconscious fraudulent fake peacenik / environmentalist.

The questions are a work in progress; they are questions I ask of myself, and have asked of others; to enable my ‘sincere peacenik / honourable warrior’ message; to be an objective honest – aka scientifically based – KISS – Keep it Simple Stupid – message, as documented in among other legal proceedings: LJ v FW de Klerk et al [lj-v-fwdk] and LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu [lj-v-ls].

Sincere Environmentalist Questions for Media to ask activists claiming to be an environmentalist:

[A] Does your individual or your organizational environmentalist groups advocacy platform propose (a) abolishing breeding / consumption / deceiving Babylon WiP supremacy legal system; i.e. does it have a plan to abolish Babylon WiP slaughterhouse slavery freedumb economy [Obama Deception: False WiP Left Right paradigm; Stefan Molyneux: The Story of [WiP] Enslavement; Human Farming: Our Enslavement; PETA: Sunny Acre Farms] enabled by Babylon WiP clauses of international law; that allow citizens to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; and (b) replaceing Babylon WiP – population / consumption growth – legal clauses with EoP sustainable procreation and consumption footprint below ecological carrying capacity limits clauses?

If so:

[B] What is your environmentalist peacenik advocacy platform’s sustainable – procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits – legal definition?

[C] Is it a KISS – Keep it simple stupid – legal definition to enable it to be easily understood by any ego literate [ego-eco-literacy] village idiot layperson, journalist, editor, or policeman or judge; to avoid Babylon WiP academics, lawyers, etc bullshitting the public with bullshit environmentalist verbal diarhea. [the more KISS the EoP legal system is the cheaper it is to abide by, to amend and to enforce; and the more it raises the credibility of the justice system, as a – racial, class, gender, religious – fair and impartial low cost justice system; thereby reducing conflict between law enforcers and the public and between different racial, religious, gender groups]

[D] Does your KISS environmentalist advocacy platform have a KISS plan to shut down the global perpetual war economy in a way that enables the people who are currently employed in the – financial, military, factory, media, etc – perpetual unsustainable resource thieving war Babylon WiP economy; to transition to a militia responsible freedom peace economy; where such economy provides them with shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the co-operative rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future?

[E] Does your KISS environmentalist advocacy platform have fair and impartial – and easily measured – sentencing penalties to enable orderly and humane weeding of any and all intentional Babylon WiP breeding / consumption / deceiving supremacist addiction cheaters from the genepool?

If not:

[F] Does your individual or your organizational environmentalist groups advocacy platform endorse any other environmentalist / peacenik groups platform whose platform is a sincere environmentalist peacenik platform?

If Not:

[G] Are you consciously and intentionally fraudulently marketing yourself as an environmentalist activist?

 

Sincere Peacenik Questions for Media to ask activists claiming to be a peacenik:

[A] Does your individual or your organizational peacenik groups advocacy platform propose (a) abolishing breeding / consumption / deceiving Babylon WiP supremacy legal system; i.e. does it have a plan to abolish Babylon WiP slaughterhouse slavery freedumb economy [Obama Deception: False WiP Left Right paradigm; Stefan Molyneux: The Story of [WiP] Enslavement; Human Farming: Our Enslavement; PETA: Sunny Acre Farms] enabled by Babylon WiP clauses of international law; that allow citizens to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; and (b) replaceing Babylon WiP – population / consumption growth – legal clauses with EoP sustainable procreation and consumption footprint below ecological carrying capacity limits clauses?

If so:

[B] What is your peacenik advocacy platform’s sustainable – procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits – legal definition?

[C] Is it a KISS – Keep it simple stupid – legal definition to enable it to be easily understood by any ego literate [ego-eco-literacy] village idiot layperson, journalist, editor, or policeman or judge; to avoid Babylon WiP academics, lawyers, etc bullshitting the public with bullshit environmentalist verbal diarhea. [the more KISS the EoP legal system is the cheaper it is to abide by, to amend and to enforce; and the more it raises the credibility of the justice system, as a – racial, class, gender, religious – fair and impartial low cost justice system; thereby reducing conflict between law enforcers and the public and between different racial, religious, gender groups]

[D] Does your KISS peacenik advocacy platform have a KISS plan to shut down the global perpetual war economy in a way that enables the people who are currently employed in the – financial, military, factory, media, etc – perpetual war Babylon WiP economy; to transition to a militia responsible freedom peace economy; where such economy provides them with shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the co-operative rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future?

[E] Does your KISS peacenik advocacy platform have fair and impartial  – and easily measured – sentencing penalties to enable orderly and humane weeding of any and all intentional Babylon WiP breeding / consumption / deceiving supremacist addiction cheaters from the genepool?

If not:

[F] Does your individual or your organizational peacenik groups advocacy platform endorse any other peacenik groups platform whose platform is a sincere peacenik platform?

If Not:

[G] Are you consciously and intentionally fraudulently marketing yourself as a peacenik activist?

Conclusion:

As of date Greta and Fridays for Future organizer Janine O Keefe have declined to answer any EoP – sincere peacenik – questions, as have many other activists marketing themselves as environmentalists and peaceniks [18 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Blanton & Radical Honesty Trainers; 18 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Norwegian Nobel Committee; 18 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Klaus Schwab & World Economic Forum; 20 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Alt Right Peace with Russia Trump voters; 20 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: US Pres/Sen/Cong Peace Candidates; 20 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: IWW Labour Organisations; 20 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Veterans for Peace; 21 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Commanders for Israel Security; 21 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Indigenous Groups; 21 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Wikileaks; 21 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Alliance for World Scientists; 21 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: End Ecocide Lawyers; 21 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Extinction Rebellion; 22 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Fridays for Future School Strike; 22 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Gilet Jaune / Yellow Vest; 22 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Black Lives Matter; 22 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Duty to Warn Psych; 22 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Me Too Movement; 22 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Women Across the DMZ; 22 May: LJ v LS Req for Info: Larry Flynt].

A copy of this correspondence is documented at EoP Legal Submissions [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za].

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson, aka Andrea Muhrrteyn [EoP Oath PDF]
EoP MILED Clerk
PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA

Sent per electronic notice to:

Igor Ogorodnev via Russia Today:
Igor Ogorodnev via Russia Today (info@rttv.ru); US Bureau (RT-US@rttv.ru); Press Office (press@rttv.ru); London Bureau (LondonBureau@rttv.ru); Sebastian Ronin (novacadia@gmail.com);

Greta Thunberg, School Strike:
Greta Thunberg (GretaThunbergMedia@gmail.com); School Strike: Janine OKeefe (info@fores.se); Fridays for Future: International (international.media@fridaysforfuture.org); Media (swe.media@fridaysforfuture.org);

Extinction Rebellion, Roger Hallam, Gail Bradbrook et al:
Extinction Rebellion (extinctionrebellion@risingup.org.uk); Press (press@risingup.org.uk); Roger Hallam (organics2go@googlemail.com); Counsel: Bindmans: Mike Schwarz (m.schwarz@bindmans.com); Rupert Read (r.read@uea.ac.uk); Greenhouse Thinktank (info@greenhousethinktank.org); Jamie Kelsey-Fry (jamiekelsey@gmail.com); Jem Bendell (iflas@cumbria.ac.uk); Rowan Williams (jeh34@cam.ac.uk); Alter Ego: Ronan Harrington (ronan@alterego.network)

.