* The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, House of Commons, John Bercow, Scottish Parliament, Ken Macintosh, National Assembly of Wales, Elin Jones, Northern Ireland Assembly, Robin Newton, London Assembly, Jennette Arnold, Conservative & Unionist Party, Boris Johnson, Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, Scottish National Party, Nicola Sturgeon, Liberal Democrats, Jo Swinson, Democratic Unionist Party, Arlene Foster, Sinn Fein, Mary Lou McDonald, Independent Group for Change, Anna Soubry, Plaid Cymru, Adam Price, Green Party of England and Wales, Sian Berry, Jonathan Bartley, Brexit Party, Nigel Farage, Scottish Green Party, Patrick Harvie, Lorna Slater, Social Democratic and Labour Party, Colum Eastwood, Ulster Unionist Party, Robin Swann, Alliance Party of Northern Ireland, Naomi Long, UK Independence Party, Richard Braine, Green Party of Northern Ireland, Clare Bailey, Traditional Unionist Voice, Jim Allister, People Before Profit, Eamonn McCann, Extinction Rebellion, Gail Bradbrook, Ronan Harrington, Plan B, Tim Crossland, Zoe Blackler, Bindmans, Mike Schwarz, UK Student Climate Network, Anna Taylor, Commonwealth Magistrates & Judges Assoc, Karen Brewer, Law Society of UK, Simon Davis, British Association of Journalists, Matthew Myatt, National Union of Journalists, Michelle Stanistreet, Ministry of Defence, General Sir Nick Carter, Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, Sir James Eadie QC, Dave Blundell, Christopher Knight, EU Commission, Claude Juncker, Ursula von der Leyen, Donald Tusk, Federica Mogherini, Article 50 Task Force, Michel Barnier, European Parliament, Antonio Tajani.
* 07 Oct: EoP Req for Info UKSC Registry Filing: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons et al: Direct EoP Pro Se Application: EoP or WiP’ Legal Certainty Clarification of 23 June 2016 Brexit Referendum and 01 May 2019 House of Commons Climate Emergency Declaration [PDF]; EoP TRC Affidavit [PDF]; Gen Ludd Wilberforce Declaratory Order [Annex A.3: PDF].
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v Speaker HoC, EoP v UK Parl, EoP v EU Parl, EoP v XR,EoP v Ecocide Lawyers, EoP v Fridays for Future, EoP v UK Prime Minister, EoP v EU President, EoP v T50 Brexit, EoP v Alt Right / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMUK | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia,EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM
Direct EoP Pro Se Application requesting ‘EoP or WiP’ Legal Certainty Clarification of 23 June 2016 Brexit Referendum and 01 May 2019 House of Commons Climate Emergency Declaration; for Applicant & EU President Respondent in ZA: Grg H 111/19: LJ v LS & 8 Others [Annex B.1].
In the matter between:
|Speaker: House of Commons||01st Respondent|
|Speaker: Scottish Parliament||02nd Respondent|
|Speaker: National Assembly for Wales||03rd Respondent|
|Speaker: Northern Ireland Assembly||04th Respondent|
|Speaker: London Assembly||05th Respondent|
|Leaders: UK Political Parties||06th Respondent|
|Leader: Extinction Rebellion||07th Respondent|
|Sec Gen: Commonwealth Magistrates & Judges Assoc||09th Respondent|
|President: Law Society of United Kingdom||09th Respondent|
|Gen Sec: British Assoc & National Union of Journalists||10th Respondent|
|Chief of Defence: Ministry of Defence||11th Respondent|
|Prime Minister||12th Respondent|
Applicant EoP TRC Affidavit
 I the undersigned, do hereby state under oath in English. I am the Ecology of Peace culture applicant in this matter, born 04 December 1966, a South African citizen, resident at 16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, South Africa.
 The objective and/or subjective truth facts set out herein fall within my personal knowledge, unless otherwise indicated by the context, and are to the best of my belief true and correct.
 I am the applicant. I am a qualified paralegal but have never worked as a paralegal. As documented in H 45/19: LJ v CRL Rights Commission and One Other; court proceedings; as of date I have not been able to find a lawyer in South Africa willing to represent me in a civil or criminal case; in accordance to my Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty cultural values [Closing Statements PDF].
 The first respondent is Speaker of the House of Commons. The UK public elects 650 Members of Parliament (MPs) to represent their interests and concerns in the House of Commons. MPs consider and propose new laws, and can scrutinise government policies by asking ministers questions about current issues either in the Commons Chamber or in Committees. The Speaker is the chief officer and highest authority of the House of Commons and must remain politically impartial at all times. The Speaker also represents the Commons to the monarch, the Lords and other authorities and chairs the House of Commons Commission. The current Speaker is John Bercow, MP for Buckingham. Generally speaking Parliamentary Speakers have the responsibility to: (a) Provide political leadership & strategic direction to the council; (b) Exercise impartiality at all times in pursuance of these duties; (c) Represents the Council in matters before the courts; The Speaker also ensures community participation in legislative initiatives. EoP correspondence to UK House of Commons [eop-v-ukparl]
 The second respondent is the Speaker also known as the Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament, currently Ken Macintosh MSP. The Presiding Officer remains politically impartial in everything that he does. The most obvious responsibility of the presiding officers is to chair plenary sessions of Parliament in the Debating Chamber. In addition, the Presiding Officer’s role includes the selection of questions to be asked at the weekly First Minister’s Question Time as well as the selection of supplementary questions & amendments. The Presiding Officer also has three other roles in chairing the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body and the Parliamentary Bureau, and representing the Parliament at home and abroad.
 The third respondent is the Speaker also known as the Presiding Officer aka Llywydd of the National Assembly for Wales, currently Erin Jones. The Llywydd also plays an active role in representing the Assembly and Wales’s interests on a national, UK and international stage and chairs the Assembly Commission. Elin Jones priorities are (a) Making the Welsh Government more accountable to the Assembly and the people of Wales; (b) Making the work of the Assembly more relevant and topical by transforming the way in which we share information; (c) Maximising capacity and strengthening the Assembly by putting the people of Wales at the heart of Assembly decision making.
 The fourth respondent is the Speaker of the Northern Ireland Assembly, currently Robin Newton DUP, who chairs plenary sessions of the Assembly, calling Members to speak on debates, maintaining order in the Chamber and replying to areas of dispute raised by Members. As Speaker, he is politically impartial and does not participate in any debates in the Assembly.
 The fifth respondent is the Speaker also known as the Chairperson of the London Assembly, currently Jennette Arnold.
 The sixth respondent are the leaders of UK Political Parties with elected members to the House of Commons, Scottish Parliament, National Assembly of Wales, Northern Ireland Assembly, London Assembly and European Parliament. Leaders of the UK Political Parties are as follows: Conservative & Unionist Party: Boris Johnson; Labour Party: Jeremy Corbyn; Scottish National Party: Nicola Sturgeon; Liberal Democrats party: Jo Swinson; Democratic Unionist Party: Arlene Foster; Sinn Fein: Mary Lou McDonald; Independent Group for Change: Anna Soubry; Plaid Cymru: Adam Price; Green Party of England & Wales: Sian Berry and Jonathan Bartley; Brexit Party: Nigel Farage; Scottish Green Party: Patrick Harvie & Lorna Slater; Social Democratic and Labour Party: Colum Eastwood; Ulster Unionist Party: Robin Swann; Alliance Party of Northern Ireland: Naomi Long; UK Independence Party: Richard Braine; Green Party of Northern Ireland: Clare Bailey; Traditional Unionist Voice: Jim Allister; People Before Profit: Eamonn McCann. EoP correspondence to UK Parliament [eop-v-ukparl] and EU Parliament [eop-v-euparl]
 The seventh respondent is Leader of Extinction Rebellion, currently Roger Hallam and Gail Bradbrook. Extinction Rebellion (“XR”) is an international apolitical network using non-violent direct action to persuade governments to act justly on the Climate and Ecological Emergency. XR UK’s demands are 01: Tell the truth. Government must tell the truth by declaring a climate and ecological emergency, working with other institutions to communicate the urgency for change. 02: Act Now: Government must act now to halt biodiversity loss and reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2025. 03: Government must create and be led by the decisions of a Citizens’ Assembly on climate and ecological justice.
[10.1] UK Student Climate Network (UKSCN) aka Fridays for Future UK is an XR partner organization founded by Anna Taylor, then aged 17, on 1 December 2018, along with Ivi Hohmann and Daniela Torres Perez. UKSCN are a group of mostly under 18s taking to the streets to protest the government’s lack of action on the Climate Crisis. UKSCN are mobilising unprecedented numbers of students to create a strong movement and send a message that we are tired of being ignored.
 The eighth respondent is Secretary General of Commonwealth Magistrates & Judges Association (“CMJA”), currently Karen Brewer. The CMJA is a registered charity whose aims and objectives are: (a) to advance the administration of the law by promoting the independence of the judiciary; (b) to advance education in the law, the administration of justice, the treatment of offenders and the prevention of crime within the Commonwealth; (c) to disseminate information and literature on all matters of interest concerning the legal process within the various countries comprising the Commonwealth.
 The ninth respondent is President of the Law Society of United Kingdom, currently Simon Davis. The UK Law Society are an independent professional body for solicitors in England and Wales, run by and for its members, whose goals are to be the voice of solicitors, drive excellence in the profession, safeguard the rule of law, work to make sure no-one is above the law, and protect everyone’s right to have access to justice.
 The tenth respondent is General Secretary of British Association & National Union of Journalists, currently respectively Matthew Myatt and Michelle Stanistreet. The British Association of Journalists (“BAJ”) is a union for journalists, both staff and freelances, working within newspapers, magazines, broadcasting and online media; providing members with direct and prompt access to specialist legal advice on employment issues. The BAJ is a gatekeeper for the ‘UK Press Card’ scheme. The National Union of Journalists (“NUJ”) is a trade union for journalists in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland, founded in 1907, with 38,000 members. It is a member of the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), and strives to improve the pay and conditions of our members and protect and promote media freedom, professionalism and ethical standards.
 The eleventh respondent is Chief of Defence: Ministry of Defence, currently General Sir Nick Carter. The MOD states that its principal objectives are to defend the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and its interests and to strengthen international peace and stability. The UK’s Ministry of Defence has published a new report which places climate and related risks among the highest impact and certainty threats to defence and security. ‘The Future Starts Today’, the sixth edition of the Global Strategic Trends report written by the Ministry’s think tank, the Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre, identifies increasing environmental stress as one of six key trends that require action; which are (a) Increasing competition in the global commons; (b) Increasing disruption and cost of climate change; (c) Increasing demand and competition for resources. The disruption and cost of climate change is assessed as entailing the highest certainty of all 16 focus areas.
 The eleventh respondent is UK Prime Minister, currently Boris Johnson. The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom is the head of government of the United Kingdom, who directs both the executive and the legislature, and, together with the Prime Minister’s Cabinet, is accountable to the Monarch, to Parliament, to the Prime Minister’s political party and, ultimately, to the electorate for the policies and actions of the executive and the legislature. Boris Johnson is the only UK Prime Minister to have had the courage to disregard political correctness snowflake conformity and express public concern about overpopulation and consumption as a root cause of global resource conflict [Telegraph: Boris Johnson: Global over-population is the real issue ; The Guardian: Boris Johnson: ‘Let us have a grown-up conversation with our American friends’].
 It is submitted that the resolution of this dispute falls jointly within the jurisdiction of (a) the High Court, Eastern Circuit Local Division of the Western Cape High Court, held at George; with regard to the applicant: as the cause of action arose mainly in its territorial domain: that is, the applicant was at all times, resident within the jurisdiction of George, when the primary legal dispute events herein referred to occurred; and (b) the UK Supreme Court, with regard to the respondents: as the cause of action arose mainly in its territorial domain: that is, the respondents were at all times, resident within the jurisdiction of the UK Supreme Court, when the primary legal dispute events herein referred to occurred.
Summary: Brexit Climate Emergency:
 23 June 2016 Brexit Referendum: Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?
[17.1] The United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, also known as the EU referendum, the European referendum and the Brexit referendum, took place on 23 June 2016 in the United Kingdom (UK) and Gibraltar to ask the electorate if the country should remain a member of, or leave the European Union (EU), under the provisions of the European Union Referendum Act 2015 and also the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The referendum resulted in 51.9% of votes being in favour of leaving the EU (17,410,742 votes). Although legally the referendum was non-binding, the government of that time had promised to implement the result, and it initiated the official EU withdrawal process on 29 March 2017, meaning that the UK was due to leave the EU before 11PM on 29 March 2019, UK time – extended to 31 October 2019 – when Brexit negotiations expired.
 01 May 2019 House of Commons Climate Emergency Declaration:
[18.1] That this House declares an environment and climate emergency following the finding of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change that to avoid a more than 1.5°C rise in global warming, global emissions would need to fall by around 45 per cent from 2010 levels by 2030, reaching net zero by around 2050; recognises the devastating impact that volatile and extreme weather will have on UK food production, water availability, public health and through flooding and wildfire damage; notes that the UK is currently missing almost all of its biodiversity targets, with an alarming trend in species decline, and that cuts of 50 per cent to the funding of Natural England are counterproductive to tackling those problems; calls on the Government to increase the ambition of the UK’s climate change targets under the Climate Change Act 2008 to achieve net zero emissions before 2050, to increase support for and set ambitious, short-term targets for the roll-out of renewable and low carbon energy and transport, and to move swiftly to capture economic opportunities and green jobs in the low carbon economy while managing risks for workers and communities currently reliant on carbon intensive sectors; and further calls on the Government to lay before the House within the next six months urgent proposals to restore the UK’s natural environment and to deliver a circular, zero waste economy. – UK Parliament: “The most important issue of our time,” Opposition calls to declare climate emergency.
Request ‘EoP & WiP’ or ‘WiP Only” Court Legal Certainty Clarity:
 Applicant is an unconditional co-operator member of an Ecology of Peace culture [Annex A.1 & A.2]
 Ecology of Peace Court, Law, Application and Elections [Annex A.3]:
[20.1] An ‘EoP Only’ Court only accepts applications from individuals who are consciously members of Ecology of Peace cultures.
[20.2] EoP – aka Garden of Eden – law clearly, simply and unequivocally requires citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to avoid ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.
[20.3] EoP culture legal applications advocate on behalf of [A] implementing EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law; and/or [B] if implemented as national or international law: enforcing EoP Scientific and Cultural law.
[20.4] An EoP election or referendum is any local, regional, or national political election or referendum based upon EoP national or international law. Politicians and voters taking part in EoP elections and referendums are legally prohibited from covertly and/or overtly bribing each other by promising and/or demanding individual or corporate innocence for sale indulgences – legislated innocence from breeding/consumption crimes of aggression externalities – legislative welfare.
 Babylon War is Peace (“WiP”) Court, Law, Application and Elections:
[21.1] A Babylon ‘WiP Only’ court only accepts applications from individuals who are consciously or unconsciously members of Babylon WiP cultures.
[21.2] Babylon WiP law consciously or unconsciously, negligently or intentionally allows citizens to procreate and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; resulting in ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.
[21.3] Babylon WiP culture legal applications consciously or unconsciously, advocate on behalf of [A] implementing Babylon WiP law as national or international law; and/or [B] if implemented as national or international law: enforcing Babylon WiP law.
[21.4] A Babylon WiP election or referendum is any local, regional, or national political election or referendum based upon Babylon WiP clauses of national or international law. Politicians and voters taking part in Babylon WiP elections and referendums consciously or unconsciously covertly and/or overtly bribe each other by promising and/or demanding individual or corporate innocence for sale indulgences – legislated innocence from breeding/consumption crimes of aggression externalities – legislative welfare.
 EoP and WiP Court:
[22.1] An EoP and WiP Court accepts applications from individuals who are consciously or unconsciously members of Ecology of Peace and/or Babylon WiP cultures.
 As noted in Applicants Closing Statement in H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC and One Other: Applicants working hypothesis conclusion interpretation of the Ecology of Peace cultural values lawyers consciously or unconsciously objected to (a) discussing verbally or in writing; and/or (b) allowing the applicant to submit into court record proceedings testimony and/or affidavit written statements:
[23.1] Culture of Honesty:
Lawyers overtly or ambiguously demanded that I engage in behaviour that I objectively and/or subjectively considered to be legal strategic and/or tactical advice that I should engage in conscious deception of the court – in legal terms fraud or perjury – that violated my honesty cultural values – and I refused. Lawyers did not want to engage in intellectual honesty truthseeking to cooperate to clearly and simply legally define responsible freedom procreation and consumption behaviour; and cooperate to draw up a legal plan to implement such responsible freedom procreation and consumption definition as international law.
[23.2] Culture of Honest Race Relations:
Lawyers did not support my cultural values of buck stops here honest race relations: honesty with black people about procreation above ecological carrying capacity limits causes of resource conflict, presumably for fear of being labeled racists. They did not appear to have objections to my honesty with white people about consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits causes of resource conflict.
[23.3] Exposing Babylon Law as root cause of all resource conflict:
Lawyers ignored or refused my legal strategic and/or tactical orders to inform the court of information and/or evidence in support of my cultural values to advocate on behalf of the strategic goal of (a) exposing and abolishing Babylon Masonic War is Peace law – clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits – as the root cause of all resource conflict, and (b) implementing Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law – clauses of international law requiring all citizens of all nations, races and religions, to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits, and relate in terms of fully informed consenting agreements – as international law.
 Ecology of Peace definition of objective honesty is EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [Annex B.3: EoP RH FR]
 Ecology of Peace definition of racism: Role of Subjective Belief and Objective Reality in Racial / Cultural / Religious Supremacy.
[25.1] Subjective belief: an idea believed by a person, which can be objectively true or false.
[25.2] SUPREMACIST: In order for a subjective belief to be ‘racial / religious / cultural’ supremacy’ (i.e. falsely supremacist: morally unethical); it must be both (a) insincerely held, and (b) objectively false.
[25.3] NOT SUPREMACIST: Sincere aka ego literate: the person sincerely holds a belief about white/blacks being superior (generally) or specifically in any particular skill, and if objectively false, the person has no personal experience evidence it is untrue. [Example A KKK/BPP member, who has never had the personal experience opportunity to meet an honourable – aka ego/eco literate honest – black/white man, sincerely could believe all blacks/whites are liars, dishonest, etc.]
[25.4] SUPREMACIST: Insincere: The person believes an idea about Muslims/Christians being superior (generally) or in a particular skill; even though (a) they have met a Atheist/Jew who has proven their supremacy idea to be false; yet they refuse – presumably for reasons of ego illiteracy – to amend their opinion to reflect the new information, and insist on their supremacy idea; which (b) is both subjectively and objectively false.
[25.5] OBJECTIVE REALITY: impartial scientific evidence for whether any idea is true or false.
[A] “White Men are generally speaking technologically speaking superior to black men.” | “African American men are generally speaking superior to white men in basketball.” | “Serena Williams is superior to 99% of white, black, asian women at tennis.” | “Traditional bushmen culture is superior to European, Asian & African culture at living sustainably”.
[25.6] If objectively TRUE, such statements are NOT RACIAL SUPREMACIST.
[25.7] For example: Bushmen culture would not be considered generally speaking superior by individuals who consider warlike cultures superior, only to individuals who consider sustainable cultural lifestyle superior.
[A] White men/women are generally speaking racially superior [Objectively untrue, but may be subjectively sincere]
[B] Black men/women are generally speaking racially superior [Objectively untrue, but may be subjectively sincere]
[25.8] If subjectively SINCERE, such a statement is NOT RACIAL SUPREMACIST.
Request Respondents EoP – Exit Babylon Ecocide Law / Climate & Ecological Emergency – UN Resolution:
Are UK Climate Emergency Resolutions Ecology of Peace or Babylon WiP Climate Emergency Declarations?:
 National Parliaments who have declared climate emergency resolutions are the Welsh Parliament (29 April 2019); Scotland Parliament (28 April 2019); United Kingdom House of Commons (1 May 2019); Gibraltar Parliament (3 May 2019), Republic of Ireland Parliament (9 May 2019); Isle of Man parliament (10 May 2019); Parliament of Portugal (7 June 2019); Canadian House of Commons (17 June 2019); French parliament (27 June 2019); Argentina Parliament (17 July 2019).
 An Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) climate emergency declaration is based on EoP law. A Babylon War is Peace (“WiP”) climate emergency declaration consciously or unconsciously is based on Babylon WiP law.
 If House of Commons 01 May Climate Emergency Declaration is EoP:
[28.1] If or when the 01 May 2019 House of Commons agree to upgrade their Climate Emergency Declaration vote to an EoP – Climate Emergency – UN Resolution [Annex B.3] Declaration [Annex C], vote.
[28.2] If it passes: UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson can – if he chooses to do so – use such EoP – Exit Babylon Ecocide Law / Climate and Ecological Emergency – Resolution Declaration as a mandate to submit EoP UN – Exit Babylon Ecocide Law / Climate and Ecological Emergency – Resolution to Michel Barnier; as the UK’s EoP Brexit written proposal to the EU. EoP correspondence to Michel Barnier Brexit Task Force [eop-v-tf50]
[28.3] If accepted by Michel Barnier on behalf of the European Union; or by European Union Presidents/Prime Ministers and EU MEP’s; UK Prime Minister Johnson and EU President Claude Juncker can submit such EoP UN Resolution to the UN General Assembly for all UN General Assembly nations vote.
 If House of Commons 01 May Climate Emergency Declaration is WiP:
[29.1] If House of Commons Climate Emergency Declaration is not resubmitted for an EoP UN Resolution [Annex B.3] Declaration [Annex C], vote; thereby confirming it as a Babylon WiP Climate Emergency Declaration.
[29.2] If so: UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson can proceed with whatever Babylon WiP Brexit proposals he is considering, to be submitted by written proposal to Michel Barnier and EU Brexit Task Force 50.
[29.3] If so: House of Commons MP’s, and/or UK Prime Minister shall again be provided the opportunity to vote – via UK Ambassador to UN General Assembly – on an Ecology of Peace – Exit Babylon Ecocide Law: Climate Emergency – UN Resolution.
[29.4] If – I Repeat IF – or when any Head of State authorizes EoP UN Resolution to be submitted to UN General Assembly for a vote.
The SA Constitutional Court Re: Ecology of Peace law:
 The Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End Abel and Kane Cold War Pro Se Amicus submitted – with consent from SA Concourt Justices [Annex B.2] – to the South African Constitutional Court in CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm] argued that South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was negligent and/or a fraud, denying both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict.
Nigel Farage: Fully Informed Consent Elections are not Possible:
 Nigel Farage confirms his belief that you can never have a fully informed consenting voters, because one mans fact is another man’s lie.
 Is Mr Farage willing to concede that voters could be provided the following EoP v WiP social contract foundation of elections objective reality facts to enable voters to make a fully informed decision as to whether they would prefer an EoP or WiP Brexit Referendum?
[32.1] An EoP election or referendum is any local, regional, or national political election or referendum based upon EoP national or international law. Politicians and voters taking part in EoP elections and referendums are legally prohibited from covertly and/or overtly bribing each other by promising and/or demanding individual or corporate innocence for sale indulgences – legislated innocence from breeding/consumption crimes of aggression externalities – legislative welfare.
[32.2] A Babylon WiP election or referendum is any local, regional, or national political election or referendum based upon Babylon WiP clauses of national or international law. Politicians and voters taking part in Babylon WiP elections and referendums consciously or unconsciously covertly and/or overtly bribe each other by promising and/or demanding individual or corporate innocence for sale indulgences – legislated innocence from breeding/consumption crimes of aggression externalities – legislative welfare.
 Nigel Farage:
[33.1] One Mans Fact is another Man’s Lie: Brexiteer tells Nigel Farage that it’s time to revoke Article 50: Len from Loughton rang into the Brexit Party leader’s LBC radio show to tell him: “I voted to Leave, but now I have changed my mind, and the government should revoke Article 50.” To laughs from Farage, he responded: “So don’t bother to ask the people, just cancel the whole thing, pretend it never happened then?” asked Farage. As Farage continued to jeer the caller explained: “No, no, cancel the whole thing, and then go back to the people. Because we’re more informed now as to what the lies are and the deception. “Because Nigel I voted to come out, but I didn’t vote to come out without a deal, I naturally assumed the people within Westminster would have the intelligence to negotiate a satisfactory deal for us.” Farage said that if there was a second referendum he believed there would be an “even bigger vote for Leave” – he asked if that would also be ignored. “No, because at least we’ll know we are fully informed this time,” he said. “You can never be fully informed because one man’s fact is another man’s lie! That’s politics at every single election that has been fought since the dawn of time.” snapped back Nigel Farage. Asked how Len would vote in the next referendum there was a long audible silence, before he said he would “have to think about it”. He explained: “At the moment it’s just a state of flux in this country… It’s like a doomsday scenario that we’re being fed every single day and you’re telling me it’s not true.” – The New European: Brexiteer tells Nigel Farage that it’s time to revoke Article 50.
Is XR’s preferred realistic Citizen Assembly Outcome: EoP or WiP?:
 XR leadership confirm that if the outcome of their citizens assembly is not realistic they will go back to the streets and campaign for another citizens assembly.
 Is XR’s realistic Citizen Assembly outcome EoP or WiP?
[35.1] EoP – aka Garden of Eden – law clearly, simply and unequivocally requires citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to avoid ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.
[35.2] Babylon WiP law consciously or unconsciously, negligently or intentionally allows citizens to procreate and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; resulting in ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.
 Yes Minister: Sir Humphrey Appleby: The Consummate Civil Servant.
[36.1] Basic rule of [Babylon WiP politicians / activists ego] government: Never set up an enquiry unless you know in advance what its findings will be. [EoP Amended]
 XR: BEIS Strategy Committee question Extinction Rebellion.
[37.1] Peter Kyle:
[A] Skip forward seventy years and say specifically what measures we need to do in – she’s quoting measures from the war – so not what we did in the war, but what do we do now [facing climate change?]
[37.2] Gail Bradbrook:
[A] I’m not here to be like a think tank, you know you’ve got Zero Carbon Britain, you know examples of Norway and Bhutan; you know its not my job to say what it should look like. We can’t decide you have to ask the British people.
[37.3] Peter Kyle:
[A] Can I put this to you then, I’m a fan of citizens assembly’s we should have been using them a lot earlier and I think allot of the issues our country faces now we could have navigated them without the divides that we have in our society, if we had used them, but you mention them many times. What happens if you do a citizen assembly and they do not deliver the scale of ambition that you want. What happens if they see that and say I’m not willing to make the changes that you are demanding of us, and we want to set a target which is 2050. How will you respond as a campaigning organization?
[37.4] Gail Bradbrooke:
[A] I actually believe that that won’t happen personally, because I think if the British people look at the facts and the science they will step up. I keep saying that British people step up when they know the reality. I think their children will get out in the streets.
[37.5] Peter Kyle:
[A] So my question is: If the citizens assembly don’t deliver the response that you want, what will your reaction be? Cause there is no point in giving power to citizens assembly; if you are not willing to listen to the outcome of the assembly in the first place.
[37.6] Gail Bradbrooke:
[A] You know, genuinely if the outcome is not realistic in terms of what we are facing, then we would get back out in the streets again and campaign for another citizens assembly.
[37.7] Peter Kyle:
[A] That gives you the result that you want.
 XR: Deep Adaptation: Getting Real about the Apocalypse:
[38.1] EoP MILED Clerk:
[A] XR have fuck all ‘honesty and sustainability believability’ measurable guidelines for deciding appointments to XR’s recommended Citizen Assembly. If XR do in fact have ‘honesty and sustainability believability’ measurable guidelines for how they decide who will be appointed to an XR Citizen Assembly; XR have not clarified what such guidelines are and/or where they can be found.
 XR-Philippa Bye:
[A] XR does not advocate any specific solution to the climate crisis, this is because all potential solutions have to be available for discussion when we get to the stage of a Citizen’s Assembly.
[40 ] EoP MILED Clerk:
[A] Any EoP paralegal can tell you that in any Babylon WiP Only court room, Media publication or Citizen Assembly charity; all the Babylon WiP Only lawyers or editors do, before their – busdriver from Basingstoke – citizen jury/readers; is control the information flow the – caterer from Clapham – jurors/readers receive from their designated Babylon WiP Yum Yum Cannibal Fuck the Kids Future – aka pretend we give a fuck about racial, religious, class, gender, intergenerational resource conflict justice; while doing fuck all to cooperate to abolish the root procreation / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limit clauses of international law causes of all resource conflict – experts and stakeholders. Then Basingstoke / Clapham jurors/readers can provide the Babylon WiP Only lawyers, charities, and environmentalists with a ‘democratic credibility rubber stamp’ endorsement of their Babylon WiP Yum Yum Cannibal Fuck the Kids Future law solutions.
EoP Consent and/or Questions, WiP Objections:
 EoP Questions:
[41.1] If Respondents have questions about Ecology of Peace UN Resolution, prior to deciding to consent or object to EoP – Exit Babylon Ecocide Law: Climate and Ecological Emergency – UN Resolution.
[41.2] Please submit such questions to Applicant. All questions will be answered in accordance to EoP ego literacy [Annex: B.3: Ego Literacy] communication policy, and submitted into court record.
 If Respondents object to Ecology of Peace UN Resolution.
[42.1] If Respondents objections are village idiot scientifically based, kindly clarify what your objections are. If your village idiot evidence is scientifically superior to EoP village idiot evidence; the appropriate EoP village idiot facts in EoP UN Resolution will be amended by Applicant; in accordance with the superior village idiot evidence.
 If Respondents consent to Ecology of Peace UN Resolution:
[43.1] If Respondents consent to Ecology of Peace UN Resolution; please sign your Ecology of Peace UN Resolution [Annex B.3] Declaration [Annex: C] EoP UN Declarations will be used to provide Heads of State with a mandate to authorize EoP UN Resolution for submission to UN General Assembly for voting by UNGA into binding international law.
 Ecology of Peace Objective Truth aka United Science for 0°C Fair Game Village Idiots [Annex B.3: EoP RH FR]
Notice of H 111/19: LJ v LS: EoP UN Resolution.
 Ecology of Peace – Exit Babylon WiP intnl-law – UN Resolution [Annex B.3]23-66 excerpt of George High Court H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu & Eight Others (“LJ v LS”) application [PDF] to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law.
[45.1] The EoP UN Resolution documentation is the updated version of the EoP TRC Amicus submitted to the Concourt in CCT 23-10: Citizen v McBride.
 As of date LJ v LS:
[46.1] Documentation has been served by SA Sheriffs on Pres Cyril Ramaphosa via Minister of International Relations and Cooperation: Naledi Pandor [PDF], Bill Gates and Giving Pledge Oligarchs via Hasso Plattner [PDF]; EU President Claude Juncker, via Marcus Cornaro [PDF].
[46.2] Respondents – Donald Trump: President of America; Ueli Maurer: President of Switzerland; António Guterres: UN Secretary General; Xi Jinping: President of People’s Republic of China; Stuart Peach: Chairman: NATO: Military Committee; Vladimir Putin: President of Russian Federation – have not yet authorized their Ambassador in Pretoria to nullify diplomatic immunity in this matter and ‘EoP TRC cooperator’ authorize service via their RSA Ambassador.
 As of date transparency notice copies of LJ v LS:
[47.1] Have been served on H 213/19: LJ v Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula: Min of Defence & Eight Others; namely: Constand Viljoen: SADF General; Mogoeng Mogoeng: Chief Justice SA Constitutional Court; Daniel Thulare: Chairman Judicial Officers Assoc of SA; Mahlatse Mahlase: Chairperson SA National Editors Forum; Kathleen Dlepu: Chairperson Legal Practice Council; Thandi Modise: Speaker of National Assembly; FW de Klerk: Former SA President; Cyril Ramaphosa: SA President; to provide military officials and judges with an EoP TRC or No EoP TRC vote; if they want one.
[47.2] Have been served on H 225/19: LJ v Speaker of George Municipal Council and Four Others: namely: Speaker: Eden / Garden Route District Council; Speaker: Western Cape Provincial Parliament; Speaker: SA Parliament National Assembly; Speaker: Pan African Parliament.
Relief Requested & Enclosures:
 Relief Requested:
[48.1] Applicant consequently requests the relief requested in the Notice of Motion.
 Affidavit Enclosures [pp.59]
[A] [A.1] Applicant Culture Membership Order (pp.02);
[A.2] Applicant EoP Axis Oaths (pp.06);
[A.3] Draft: Gen Ludd Wilberforce Declaratory Order (pp.02);
[B] [B.1] Sheriff Service of H 111/19: LJ v LS to EU Amb in Pretoria (pp.01).
[B.2] CCT 23-10: Citizen v McBride: 03 May 2010: EoP Culture Amicus Order (pp.02);
[B.3] EoP UN Resolution (pp.42) pp.25-66 excerpts H 111/19: LJ v LS;
[B.4] Draft: MilDem EoP UN Resolution Martial Law (pp.02)
[C] [C] Draft: EoP UN Resolution Declaration (pp.02).
Signed and Sworn at George on 07 October 2019, Deponent acknowledging that she knows and understands the Affidavit contents, has no objection to taking the prescribed oath and that the oath is binding on her conscience.
——- Footnotes ——-
 http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/africa/za/hc/lj-v-crlrc/ archive.fo/drL9i
 https://www.parliament.gov.za/na-presiding-officers archive.is/mdCKY
 http://www.george.gov.za/speaker archive.is/zc4g0
 http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/eu/uk/eop-v-ukparl/ archive.fo/E7RXi
 http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/eu/uk/eop-v-ukparl/ archive.fo/E7RXi
 http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/eu/coe/eop-v-euparl/ archive.fo/fbOtA
 http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/eu/uk/eop-v-xr/ archive.fo/g0tT7
 http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/eu/se/eop-v-gteet/ archive.fo/z932o
 Ministry of Defence: Global Strategic Trends:
 Planetary Security Initiative: UK Ministry of Defence identifies climate change and resource use among the highest risks to defence and security
 http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/eu/coe/eop-v-tf50/ archive.fo/DCeBw
 https://youtu.be/II7DHI24PTE ELS: 25 Aug: EoP Re: XR: BEIS Strategy Committee Re: cutting UK carbon emissions http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2019/08/25-aug-mlopatin-tcrossland/
 24 Sep: EoP Req for – United Science – Info to SY Team Malizia.
 24 Jul: LJ v LS Sheriff Service to Hasso Plattner: RSA Rep of The Giving Pledge
 25 Jul: LJ v LS Sheriff Svc to M Cornaro: Amb: EU Delegation in SA
 04 Sep: Sheriff Svc to LJvLS CH-UN-CN-BE-US-RU Amb Resp Deadline extended to 16 Dec 2019
 http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/africa/za/hc/lj-v-sgmc/ archive.is/igB7k
 http://eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za/eop-axis-milnec-evac/eop-axis-oath/ archive.is/Yv2t3
 http://eop-miled-clerk.tygae.org.za/2017/09/23-sep-iaea-dgamano/ archive.fo/NrdRC