09 Nov: LJ v CRLRC: J Erasmus & JSC: Case Dismissal Merit Issues in Dispute

* Faadiah Davids, Judge Nathan Erasmus, Judicial Service Commission, Sello Chiloane, Tebogo Phaahlamohlaka, Judges Matter.
* 09 Nov: LJ v CRLRC: J Erasmus & JSC: Case Dismissal Merit Issues in Dispute.
» 09 Nov: LJ Re: Notice: Judicial Service Commission and Judge NC Erasmus.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v CRLRC, LJ v Legal Practice Council / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP v WiP Neg.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
EASTERN CIRCUIT LOCAL DIVISION OF THE WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT; HELD AT GEORGE, SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: H 45/19
Case No Circuit Court: 18912/19

In the matter between:

Lara Johnson Applicant
and  
CRL Rights Commission 1st Respondent
Legal Practice Council 2nd Respondent

CASE DISMISSAL MERIT ISSUES IN DISPUTE

Reference to bundles is to 08 Nov 2019: Practice Note, Heads of Argument & Order [PDF[1]]; A: Primary Docs [PDF[2]]; Negotiation Correspondence: B1: 13 Feb – 16 Apr 2019 [PDF[3]]; B2: 27 Jun – 15 Jul 2019 [PDF[4]]; B3: 12 Aug – 18 Oct 2019 [PDF[5]]

[A] Read the Papers, Ready to Engage Ex-Parte:

[1] NE: Then of course I have read this CRL Rights Commission file ….. And I tried to get people to comply with the Practice Directives, especially our practitioners, strictly. So I will only make exceptions if I have a good reason. So I have tried to look through these papers, right. So, there is a return of service and you know its very difficult for me to read if papers are copied like this. …… LJ: Did you read the Application for Referral to Mediation? NE: I’ve read the papers. LJ: It says there Request for Information. NE: I’ve read the papers Mrs Johnson, you can accept that. …… NE: So, I am ready to first engage you on whether you have made out a case, on the papers, even ex-parte, without the other side being here. … NE: That is the purpose of this question, because I want to find out whether I understand your case, if not, whether you can help me to understand your case, because it doesn’t make sense to postpone the matter for a notice of set down if there is no way that you can get your relief, that you seek. ………  I said to you. I’ve read your papers, even though they were not paginated, even though they were on double sided printing etc, because I realized that you were in person, that you didn’t have a legal representative. For that reason I have gone the extra mile to read it and not to be bothered with all the compliance with the court rules and/or the practice directives, in so far as it relates to the preparation of the case. That is why I just wanted to make sure with you whether I have the correct documents in front of me at the outset. …… NE: Let me further explain to you. If a matter is set down before a court. The court is obliged to interrogate the matter and the litigant is obliged to a judgment, is entitled to a judgment or an order, and even a postponement, a court has to decide whether it is appropriate to postpone the matter. That is a judicial discretion. And I can only do that once I have read the papers, and I have given you an opportunity to speak to the papers and explain to me what is meant by certain things in the event that I don’t understand. ……. NE: I am not satisfied that you have made out your case for the orders that you seek, on the papers that is filed in this matter.

[2] I am unclear what papers exactly Judge Erasmus read, whether he had access to all the papers filed, or only some.

[3] If Judge Erasmus read all the papers as requested in the Practice Note; I am unclear how I did not make my case for recognition of my Ecology of Peace cultural membership.

.

 [B] Deal with – EoP culture or not – merits of case:

[4] LJ: Your honour, as I said to the respondents, we can either deal with the merits of the case or we can deal with the formal legalese. …… The order requested is for confirmation of cultural membership. The lawyers, I have been in these courts for about twenty years now asserting that in terms of cultural membership. And that was a request to the CRL Rights Commission what information do they require from me, in order to confirm in writing my cultural membership, so that if I have a dispute with somebody or I have a disagreement with someone I can say ‘look this is’ and that is what the Constitutional Court consented to in terms of filing my Amicus. So that is all I was requesting from the CRL Rights Commission because whenever I go   to a lawyer and I say this is my cultural membership, money is, what do they say about lawyers, money is cheap but wait until you have to I can’t remember the quote now. Until you have to deal with a lawyer.  It is just never ending. Never ending. So the only thing that I request is that I am a member of this culture, so if I go to a lawyer I can say ‘this is my cultural membership’. These are my cultural values can you, would you be willing to legally represent an individual who is a member of this culture. If you are not willing to represent that, that is okay, but then they want to argue about whether I am a member of that culture or not. Because part of the concept of that culture is overbreeding and overconsumption causes resource conflict, and the legal systems refusal to recognize that there are no laws that require people to procreate and consume below carrying capacity limits is what causes resource conflict and the lawyers profiteer from resource conflict. ………. So that is the principle of my request, where do I go to confirm my cultural membership? That is what I did, I went to the CRL Rights Commission for fifteen years now. And all of those documents are filed in there. The number of times I have filed for them. Finally, when I filed these documents they would recognize me for the community council. But a community council is more than one person. So then I filed hundreds of correspondence to all peaceniks in South Africa, people who identify as a sincere peacenik, as a sincere peaceful person, because you can’t be a sincere peaceful person if you allow, if you say these people can overbreed and these people can overconsume; then we are going to have resource conflict. So if you want to be a sincere peacenik you have to tell these people stop overbreeding and these people stop overconsuming, so we can all get to a point where there is enough resources for us all and we are not all fighting and we are not all wasting your time. ………. NE: Accompanied with that Practice Note was also a set of Heads of Argument.  LJ: Thats correct. NE: That sets out your argument in the matter. There was also a proposed order and next to that is the one for cultural membership and cultural legal representation. That is a draft order. LJ: That is correct  NE: Uhmmm then there was a document called Ecology of Peace Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior cultural values. LJ: Those are enclosures to the order. NE: Yes. LJ: Oh okay. NE: Uhm that you wanted me to have a look at. Then there is a LJ: Basically those are definitions of a sincere peacenik or my what I imagine would be if there is a  NE: So the only order you actually want is the one that was proposed in your draft order.  LJ: Thats the  NE: on the basis of the argument that you have made out in the heads of argument. LJ: in that definition, but that was my definition, legal definition. NE: So I have indicated to you earlier on that I will only postpone a matter if there is any prospect that you will be able to get your order. LJ: Okay.  NE: I am not satisfied that you have made out your case for the orders that you seek, on the papers that is filed in this matter. You have not made out a case to be entitled for the order: A on legal principles; and secondly the facts itself does not support the order that you seek. Therefore this application that was under H45/19 and is now under case number 18912/19 is dismissed.

[5] Based upon the merits of the case: the issue in dispute between myself and respondents, which can be phrased in different ways is:

[5.1] Is the applicant a member of an Ecology of Peace culture?
[5.2] What are her EoP culture values?
[5.3] What legal representation is she entitled to when involved in a dispute with someone who does not practice her Ego/Eco literacy[6] resource conflict resolution cultural values?
[5.4] If she is a member of an EoP culture:

[A] Sign the order [a] recognizing her as a member of such culture, which order clearly defines what those Ego/Eco literacy resource conflict cultural values consist of, and [b] clarifying whether she is entitled to standby / assistance of counsel legal representation when in a legal dispute with an individual who personally and/or whose legal counsel does not practice her Ecology of Peace Ego/Eco literacy[7] resource conflict resolution cultural values.

[5.5] If she is not a member of an EoP culture[8]:

[A] Clearly and simply clarify (a) how and why she is not a member of Ecology of Peace culture; and/or what information or evidence she is required to provide to the respondents and/or court to prove that she is a member of the EoP culture; and (b) why she is not entitled to standby / assistance of counsel legal representation when in a legal dispute with an with an individual who personally and/or whose legal counsel does not practice her Ecology of Peace Ego/Eco literacy resource conflict resolution cultural values.

.

[C] Court Record is for factually correct information only:

[6] NE: You can try and place on record as much as you want as long as it is factually correct.

[7] I don’t know what Judge Erasmus legal definition for objective and/or subjective factual reality information is.

[8] Ecology of Peace legal definition of objective – EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality factual reality are repeatedly referenced in EoP submissions to CRLRC court record[9]:

[9] EoP Objective Reality for sincere peacenik / honourable warrior:

[9.1] Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr] and EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw] are EoP culture’s functional group shared system of thought and action frame of orientation and object of inter-species relating devotion interpretation of reality for individuals whose object of devotion/values include: (i) honest – race, religious, gender and cultural – relationships; (ii) an ecological carrying capacity based perspective of observable factual social contract reality; and (iii) non-violent cooperative root cause problem solving.

[9.2] Ecology of Peace Objective Factual Reality:

[A] [1] Earth is not flat. [2] Resources are finite. [3] When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict. [4] Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: climate change, mass migration, poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc. [5] The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Babylon Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.

[9.3] Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior: Objective Interpretative Reality:

[A] [6] If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy [ego-eco-literacy] – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate [eop-cooperator.tygae.org.za] to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw] clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.

[10] Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior: Subjective Reality:

[11] In a Babylon WiP international and national constitutional law polegal system, most subjective reality resource conflict disputes, are symptoms of living in a Babylon WiP international law legal system, that allows procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits, resulting in resource depletion, ecological overshoot and resource conflict.

[11.1]  Judges, lawyers, editors, academics, politicians, religious leaders, etc can encourage citizens to focus only on their individual or group racial, religious, class or gender subjective reality resource conflict dispute, totally ignoring the root WiP international law causes of their subjective resource conflict reality; or

[11.2] Judges, lawyers, editors, academics, politicians, religious leaders etc can encourage the individuals to focus on their subjective reality resource conflict dispute, within the context of recognizing their resource conflict dispute, is a symptom of living in a Babylon WiP international law legal system; and cooperatively legally, politically, religiously, academically, etc advocate on behalf of abolishing the root WiP international law cause of all racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict disputes.

[12] Subjective Reality Summary:

[12.1] Factual Reality is founded upon Facts: what happened, who said what, who did what to whom, how, when and where. We create the world by noticing who, what, when and how via our senses of sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch.

[12.2] Our motives for who we choose to be, and what we choose to do and say — covertly and/or overtly — are a reflection of our cultural subjective – ethnicity, religion and class identity – reality.

[12.3] In any objective and/or subjective reality event or circumstance, interpretive Reality is founded upon the interpretation of concrete facts and/or abstract concepts[10].

[12.4] Different interpretations of concrete facts and/or abstract concepts can be quickly resolved with no wasting of time or resources; with ego literacy sincere honest listening and confirming of accuracy or inaccuracy of interpretations.

[12.5] Different interpretations of concrete facts and/or abstract concepts can take forever to resolve with massive wasting of time and resources where individuals lack ego literacy character communication skills; and refuse to answer questions and/or confirm the accuracy or inaccuracy of an interpretation; resulting in negligent and/or malicious misrepresentations and/or misunderstandings, where such misrepresentations and/or misunderstandings then become fodder for more disagreements, and more Babylonian confusion and conflict.

[12.6] Objective and Subjective reality interpretations can be functional or dysfunctional. Cooperative resource sharing interpretations will be considered functional amongst individuals who identify as cooperative resource sharing individuals and considered dysfunctional amongst individuals who identify as competitors. Village idiot interpretations will be considered functional amongst individuals who identify as village idiots, and considered dysfunctional amongst individuals who identify as expert deceivers. Objective and subjective interpretations of reality will be considered functional amongst individuals who value brutal honest sharing of objective and subjective interpretations to reach a collective consciousness truth conclusion; and considered dysfunctional amongst individuals who have do not value brutal honest sharing of objective and subjective interpretations to reach a collective consciousness truth conclusion.

[13] An individuals subjective reality can either be honestly transparent, or covertly hidden behind a false public relations image management subjective reality.

[14] Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural international law solution for avoiding subjective reality conflicts with individuals who have strong attachments to a particular racial, religious or cultural value system, is to provide such groups of individuals with Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands[11].

.

[E] Relief – on ego/eco literacy culture merits – sought is incompetent.

[15] NE: But I have other issues, and that is why I said I am just not postponing, because should I postpone a matter, there must be the probability, at least a probability that a proper case is made out, that a court can adjudicate on. Now I am not so sure that the relief you seek is competent. LJ: I imagine it would depend on your definition of competent.

[16] Applicant has no problem agreeing that there are many many skills that applicant is totally and abysmally incompetent at. Lying two faced gatkruiping hypocrisy is one of them. Applicant is an incompetent liar and two faced gatkruiper.

[17] To the extent that Judge Erasmus courts is a ‘WiP Only court for competent stare decisis constipated obedient gatkruiper liars’ court; any application I submit to such ‘obedient gatkruiping court’ will be ruled incompetent.

[18] Applicant has no problem admitting that when it comes to being honest and sincere, applicant is plausibly the most honest and sincere person in South Africa, by far. There is not one judge or lawyer in South Africa, that has applicants honesty competency. Not one. Not even close.

[19] To the extent that Judge Erasmus court is a court that values honest and sincere EoP law application resolutions for resource conflict problem solving; any application I file will be considered competent on the – ego/eco literate cooperative resource conflict problem solving – merits, but it may lack competencies on the procedural legalese technical aspects.

.

[F] Dismissal of One EoP Application or All EoP Applications?:

[20] NE: So those other three or four matters of yours, we don’t have formal files yet; but we found the papers, or we found some papers amongst these bundles of papers. Now I don’t know whether they are all connected. LJ: To a degree they are yes.  NE: I suspected that when I looked at just the front pages of the notices, that were floating around. So A: one must consider whether these matters are going to be consolidated into one matter, whether they can be consolidated, is another question. Then of course I have read this file.  LJ: The CRL Rights Commission  NE: The CRL Rights Commission.  LJ: A lot of the others depend on the

[21] If the reasons for your dismissal of CRLRC case is based upon your conscious or unconscious ‘WiP Only’ law juridical decision making; then there is no point in wasting the respondents of any of the other cases time continuing with legal negotiations that are going to be placed before a ‘WiP Only’ judge, and consequently going to be dismissed without a conflict of cultures juridical enquiry into the EoP culture merits.

[22] If Ecology of Peace culture – applications are not welcome in George High Court, then the dismissal applies to all Ecology of Peace culture applications in George High Court, which rely on confirmation of my EoP culture:

[22.1] H 45/19: LJ v CRL Rights Comm & One Other
[22.2] H 51/19: LJ v Graeme Johnstone and Five Others
[22.3] H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu and Eight Others
[22.4] H 213/19: LJ v Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula and Eight Others
[22.5] H 225/19: LJ v Speaker: George Municipal Council and Four Others.

[23] A confirmation of denial of EoP culture is effectively a confirmation and consequent authorization of ‘No EoP TRC: Lara and Tim McVeigh Siberia Assisted Suicide’ arrangements as documented in H 111/19: LJ v LS[12]. If so: I will need to inform the respondents, so as to provide the required paperwork to the relevant American and Russian authorities, to make the requested No EoP TRC: Lara and Tim McVeigh Siberia Assisted Suicide’ arrangements.

[24] If so: I have drafted a – ICJ Judge Weeramantry legal advisory: intensive cross cultural educational campaign in a very dramatic kind of way so as to arrest their immediate attention[13] – ‘ WiP Only Judge’ order. I submitted it to Jeremy Gauntlett QC[14] – undoubtedly South Africa’s corporate[15] innocence for – consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits – sale indulgences Pope Leo X[16] WiP Only Judge; for his consideration and feedback. I have not received any feedback yet.

.

…………

[1] http://lj-v-crlrc.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-10-30_LJvCRL_PN-HoA-Order.pdf

[2] http://lj-v-crlrc.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-10-30_LJvCRL_B-A_CP-ToC-PrimDocs.pdf

[3] http://lj-v-crlrc.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-10-30_LJvCRL_B-B1_CP-ToC-NC-13Feb-16Apr.pdf

[4] http://lj-v-crlrc.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-10-30_LJvCRL_B-B2_CP-ToC-NC-27Jun-15Jul.pdf

[5] http://lj-v-crlrc.tygae.org.za/pdf/19-10-30_LJvCRL_B-B3_CP-ToC-NC-12Aug-18Oct.pdf

[6] Bundle B3: Filing 09 Sep 2019: Negotiation Correspondence: 12 Aug – 04 Sep 2019: * 14 Aug: LJ Re: CRLRC-KS Re: CRLRC Recognition of EoP Community Council Offer [B3.pp.05-09]:

EoP MILED Clerk acting on behalf of EoP Culture – whether recognized by CRLRC or not – is and has been the only scientific based – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior – culture in South Africa or globally, who has and continues to advocate on behalf of implemention of EoP SciCult law [eop-scicultlaw] as international law – (a) eco literacy: scientific based resolution of conflict by exposing the root – procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits – causes of all racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict; and (b) ego literacy: objective and subjective honest relating: honest listening and speaking communication policy to enable honest fully informed consent inter-cultural, racial, religious, class and gender relating – to enable sincere promotion and development of peace, friendship, humanity, tolerance and national unity among and within the different communities in South Africa, and other nations.

Reference to Ego literacy with link to online definition:

Bundle A: Primary Documents: Filing 18 Feb 2019: Invitation to Negotiation and/or Mediation [A.pp.22-25]; Draft: Consent to Negotiation [A.pp.27-29]

Ego/Eco literacy definition in court record:
* Bundle A: Filing 12 Aug 2019: Applicant Reply Affidavit: Annex A: Order: EoP Culture Membership: Ecology of Peace Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior Culture values [A.pp.66-81]; Responsible Freedom Oath [A.pp.83-87] | Filing 09 Sep 2019: Closing Statements: Applicant Closing Statement: Annex A: Order: EoP Culture Membership: Ecology of Peace Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior Culture values [A.pp.106-121], Responsible Freedom Oath [A.pp.123-127]
* Bundle B2. Filing: 12 Aug 2019: Negotiation Correspondence: 27 Jun – 15 Jul 2019: * 28 Jun: LJ Letter Re: H45/19: CRLRC: Eddie Mafadza Answering Affidavit: Culture Info [B2.pp.09-12]; Annex: 19-06-28 LJvCRLRC EoPCulture Info [B2.pp.78-93] |  * 04 Jul: LJ v LPC Req for EoP TRC Info to J Gauntlett QC & Adv Group 621 [B2.pp.13-19]: Annex: 19-05-10: LJ v LS: EoP UN Resolution: Ego Literacy [B2.pp.131-132]; EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [B2.pp.138-142]; Responsible Freedom Oath [B2.pp.155-156]
* Bundle B3: Filing 29 Oct 2019: Negotiations Correspondence: 11 Sep – 18 Oct 2019: * 17 Oct: EoP Re: XR v Met Police: PHain v Solicitors Reg Auth: Annex: 19-10-07: LJ v Speaker House of Commons: EoP UN Resolution: Ego Literacy [B3.pp.118-119]; EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [B2.pp.125-129]; Responsible Freedom Oath [B2.pp.142-143].

[7] Bundle B3: Filing 09 Sep 2019: Negotiation Correspondence: 12 Aug – 04 Sep 2019: * 14 Aug: LJ Re: CRLRC-KS Re: CRLRC Recognition of EoP Community Council Offer [B3.pp.05-09]:

EoP MILED Clerk acting on behalf of EoP Culture – whether recognized by CRLRC or not – is and has been the only scientific based – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior – culture in South Africa or globally, who has and continues to advocate on behalf of implemention of EoP SciCult law [eop-scicultlaw] as international law – (a) eco literacy: scientific based resolution of conflict by exposing the root – procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits – causes of all racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict; and (b) ego literacy: objective and subjective honest relating: honest listening and speaking communication policy to enable honest fully informed consent inter-cultural, racial, religious, class and gender relating – to enable sincere promotion and development of peace, friendship, humanity, tolerance and national unity among and within the different communities in South Africa, and other nations.

Reference to Ego literacy with link to online definition:

Bundle A: Primary Documents: Filing 18 Feb 2019: Invitation to Negotiation and/or Mediation [A.pp.22-25]; Draft: Consent to Negotiation [A.pp.27-29]

Ego literacy definition in court record:
* Bundle A: Filing 12 Aug 2019: Applicant Reply Affidavit: Annex A: Order: EoP Culture Membership: Ecology of Peace Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior Culture values [A.pp.66-81]; Responsible Freedom Oath [A.pp.83-87] | Filing 09 Sep 2019: Closing Statements: Applicant Closing Statement: Annex A: Order: EoP Culture Membership: Ecology of Peace Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior Culture values [A.pp.106-121], Responsible Freedom Oath [A.pp.123-127]

* Bundle B2. * 28 Jun: LJ Letter Re: H45/19: CRLRC: Eddie Mafadza Answering Affidavit: Culture Info [B2.pp.09-12]; Annex: 19-06-28 LJvCRLRC EoPCulture Info [B2.pp.78-93] |  * 04 Jul: LJ v LPC Req for EoP TRC Info to J Gauntlett QC & Adv Group 621 [B2.pp.13-19]: Annex: 19-05-10: LJ v LS: EoP UN Resolution: Ego Literacy [B2.pp.131-132]

* Bundle B3: Filing 29 Oct 2019: Negotiations Correspondence: 11 Sep – 18 Oct 2019: * 17 Oct: EoP Re: XR v Met Police: PHain v Solicitors Reg Auth: Annex: 19-10-07: LJ v Speaker House of Commons: EoP UN Resolution: Ego Literacy [B3.pp.118-119]

[8] B3. Filing Notice: 29 Oct 2019: Negotiation Correspondence: 11 Sep – 18 Oct 2019:

* 17 Oct: EoP Re: XR v Met Police: Peter Hain v Solicitors Regulation Auth: [pp.53-59] Applicant EoP TRC Affidavit [B3.pp.76-93]

EoP Consent and/or Questions, WiP Objections:

[41] EoP Questions:

[41.1] If Respondents have questions about Ecology of Peace UN Resolution, prior to deciding to consent or object to EoP – Exit Babylon Ecocide Law: Climate and Ecological Emergency – UN Resolution.

[41.2] Please submit such questions to Applicant. All questions will be answered in accordance to EoP ego literacy [Annex: B.3: Ego Literacy] communication policy, and submitted into court record.

[42] If Respondents object to Ecology of Peace UN Resolution.

[42.1] If Respondents objections are village idiot scientifically based, kindly clarify what your objections are. If your village idiot evidence is scientifically superior to EoP village idiot evidence; the appropriate EoP village idiot facts in EoP UN Resolution will be amended by Applicant; in accordance with the superior village idiot evidence.

[43] If Respondents consent to Ecology of Peace UN Resolution:

[43.1] If Respondents consent to Ecology of Peace UN Resolution; please sign your Ecology of Peace UN Resolution [Annex B.3] Declaration [Annex: C] EoP UN Declarations will be used to provide Heads of State with a mandate to authorize EoP UN Resolution for submission to UN General Assembly for voting by UNGA into binding international law.
[9] * Bundle A: Filing 12 Aug 2019: Applicant Reply Affidavit: Annex A: Order: EoP Culture Membership: Ecology of Peace Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior Culture values [A.pp.66-81]; Responsible Freedom Oath [A.pp.83-87] | Filing 09 Sep 2019: Closing Statements: Applicant Closing Statement: Annex A: Order: EoP Culture Membership: Ecology of Peace Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior Culture values [A.pp.106-121], Responsible Freedom Oath [A.pp.123-127]

* Bundle B2. * 28 Jun: LJ Letter Re: H45/19: CRLRC: Eddie Mafadza Answering Affidavit: Culture Info [B2.pp.09-12]; Annex: 19-06-28 LJvCRLRC EoPCulture Info [B2.pp.78-93] |  * 04 Jul: LJ v LPC Req for EoP TRC Info to J Gauntlett QC & Adv Group 621 [B2.pp.13-19]: Annex: 19-05-10: LJ v LS: EoP UN Resolution: EoP RH Factual Reality [B2.pp.138-142]; Ego Literacy [B2.pp.131-132]

* Bundle B3: Filing 29 Oct 2019: Negotiations Correspondence: 11 Sep – 18 Oct 2019: * 17 Oct: EoP Re: XR v Met Police: PHain v Solicitors Reg Auth: Annex: 19-10-07: LJ v Speaker H.Commons: EoP UN Resolution: EoP RH Factual Reality [B3.pp.125-129]; Ego Literacy [B3.pp.118-119]

 

[10] Guide to Grammer: Abstract,  Concrete, General, and  Specific Terms:
http://guidetogrammar.org/grammar/composition/abstract.htm

Concrete terms refer to objects or events that are available to the senses. Examples of concrete terms include spoon, table, velvet eye patch, nose ring, sinus mask, green, hot, walking.  [This is directly opposite to abstract terms, which name things that are not available to the senses.] ….. Abstract terms refer to ideas or concepts; they have no physical referents: love, success, freedom, good, moral, democracy, and any -ism (chauvinism, Communism, feminism, racism, sexism).

 

[11] * Bundle B2. * 04 Jul: LJ v LPC Req for EoP TRC Info to J Gauntlett QC & Adv Group 621 [B2.pp.13-19]: Annex: 19-05-10: LJ v LS: EoP UN Resolution: Cult Law Self Rule [B2.pp.129-130]

* Bundle B3: Filing 29 Oct 2019: Negotiations Correspondence: 11 Sep – 18 Oct 2019: * 17 Oct: EoP Re: XR v Met Police: PHain v Solicitors Reg Auth: Annex: 19-10-07: LJ v Speaker H.Commons: EoP UN Resolution: Cult Law Self Rule [B3.pp.116-117]

[12] Bundle B2. Filing: 12 Aug 2019: Negotiation Correspondence: 27 Jun – 15 Jul 2019: * 04 Jul: LJ v LPC Req for EoP TRC Info to J Gauntlett QC & Adv Group 621 [B2.pp.13-19]: Annex: 19-05-10: LJ v LS: EoP UN Resolution: Notice of Motion [B2.pp.96-101]

Summary of Application Orders Requested:

An Order confirming Respondents – on behalf of their Head of State – Consent / Edit / Objection Response to:

[A] Authorize EoP PoW TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War Negotiations:

Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End Abel and Kane Cold War negotiations to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law; by process of EoP UN Resolution; to [A] enable responsible freedom orderly and humane – de-industrialization and depopulation, prisoner release, land reform and denuclearization – shut down of the WiP Ponzi Swamp economy; [B] require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; [C] nationalize all property and provide all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) with cultural law self rule for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration land reform to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

[B] If EoP TRC: Authorize EoP UN Resolution:

Ecology of Peace recommended: [A] UN Security Council and General Assembly Resolution to Implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law; [B] Suggested Amendment to Crime of Aggression Definition of Rome Statute of International Criminal Court.

[C] If No EoP TRC: Authorize US v McVeigh Siberia PoW Suicide:

Logistics: (a) Respondent Lapenn on behalf of Respondent NSA: Gen Paul Nakasone and/or Timothy McVeigh’s NSA superior; authorizing the release of Timothy McVeigh to travel to South Africa and to Russia with applicant for their joint assisted suicide in Siberia; (b) Respondent Lapenn and Respondent Petrakov on behalf of Respondent NSA Dir Gen Paul Nakasone and Respondent FSB Dir Gen Alexander Bortnikov negotiating the authorized release of Timothy McVeigh to travel to South Africa and to Russia with applicant for their joint assisted suicide in Siberia; (c) Respondent Sisulu authorizing a visa for Timothy McVeigh to travel to Russia via South Africa; (d) Respondent Petrakov issuing a visa for Applicant and Timothy McVeigh to travel to Russia for their assisted suicide departure in unmarked graves in the Siberian wilderness.

[13] World Future Council: ICJ Judge C. G. Weeramantry  youtu.be/1jxj-qvk4s4

To my mind the educational front is the most important because many of the problems we have today are due to a lack of understanding in various fields. A lack of cross cultural understanding, a lack of understanding of the implications for the future of some of the modern technologies, a lack of understanding for example that nuclear waste pollutes the environment for twenty thousand years and way beyond. Now these are all matters we have to get to the general public, we have to get them to the decision-makers, and I think that an intensive educational campaign is required on the effects of all the current activities on future generations, as well as the lack of understanding between different sections of the global community. [What one action should the World Future Council take?] In terms of an intensive campaign to get statistics, facts, figures and reflections on these matters to people at all levels, from the school children right up to the legislators. So materials have to be prepared I think on some of these in a very dramatic kind of  way so as to arrest their immediate attention, and this should be circulated, for example on nuclear weapons I have prepared a little booklet the size of a pocketbook which one can put in ones pocket and read in the tram or the train which lists about fifteen or more reasons why the danger of the use of a nuclear weapon somewhere sometime is growing by the day. It is true we have sixty years without the use of a nuclear weapon in warfare, but that does not mean that the danger is remote. The danger is increasing practically by the day, and we have to spread that message. [What will you bring to the World Future Council?] My life has been spent in the law, so that I might be able to bring some legal perspectives to bear on all its work and much of this is connected with human rights and international law so I can help in that area. It also happens that I have interested myself in topics such as the impact of technology on human rights, the question of sustainable development, the legal dangers and illegality of nuclear weapons, the rich world poor world problem, the lack of understanding between different cultural groups. So those are all ways in which I can I hope make a small contribution.

[14] 03 Nov: Upd Req for EoP TRC Info to J Gauntlett QC / BP-XR Req for EoP TRC 0ºC or No EoP TRC 4ºC Economy Info http://eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za/2019/11/03-nov-jgauntlettqc-msp/     Password: password.tygae.org.za

[15] IOL: The exorbitant price of justice  www.iol.co.za/the-star/the-exorbitant-price-of-justice-1575149

Jeremy Gauntlett, consistently identified by lawyers interviewed for this article as one of the top two or three earners, charges in the region of R40 000 to R60 000 per day.

[16] Ninety-five Theses  wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninety-five_Theses

.