27 Nov: LJ Re: SRA-NL: Re: Upd: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons & 11 Others

* Solicitors Regulation Authority, Paul Philip, Nicholas Leach, Law Society of UK, Simon Davis, Ben Davies, Harriet Beaumont, Liam McCafferty, Emma Clarke, Commonwealth Magistrates & Judges Assoc, Karen Brewer, Ministry of Defence, Nick Carter
* 27 Nov: LJ Re: SRA-NL: Re: Upd: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons & 11 Others [PDF].
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v Speaker: HoC / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMUK | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: Lara Johnson <eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 17:50:21 +0200
Subject: Re: Upd: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons & 11 Others.
To: Nicholas Leach <nicholas.leach@sra.org.uk>
Cc: Solicitors Regulation Authority <protectlegalusers@sra.org.uk>, Contact Center <contactcentre@sra.org.uk>, Paul Philip <paul.philip@sra.org.uk>, “Law Society of UK: Simon Davis: Ben Davies” <ben.davies@lawsociety.org.uk>, Harriet Beaumont <harriet.beaumont@lawsociety.org.uk>, Liam McCafferty <liam.mccafferty@lawsociety.org.uk>, Emma Clarke <emma.clarke@lawsociety.org.uk>, Wales <wales@lawsociety.org.uk>, Brussels <brussels@lawsociety.org.uk>, “Commonwealth Magistrates & Judges Assoc: Karen Brewer” <info@cmja.org>, “Ministry of Defence: General Sir Nick Carter: MOD Ministerial Correspondence Unit” <parlibranch-treat-official@mod.gov.uk>, MOD Information Rights Team <cio-foi@mod.gov.uk>
Message-ID: <4d4678e8196733b47423590f4135d608@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za

TO: SRA: Nicholas Leach:
CC: SRA: Paul Philip
CC: Law Society of UK: Simon Davis:
CC: Commonwealth Magistrates & Judges Assoc: Karin Brewer
CC: MoD: General Carter:

Nicholas Leach:

Re: Upd: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons & 11 Others.

Re: Your email sent Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:53:26 +0200

SRA-NL: I am not too sure as to the relevance of this email for the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

EoP-LJ: That would probably depend on your definition of relevance. EoP and WiP law [Summary: EoP v WiP Law PDF] have different definitions of relevance:

The question is whether EoP SciCult law or WiP Babylon law should be master intnl law; that’s all

Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix Reality doctrine — the Inalienable ‘Right to Breed and Consume, but you need a License to Own a Gun, a License to Drive a Car, a License to Practice Law, a television license, a credit license, a license to earn a living, a university exemption license, a license to fish, a license to hunt, a liquor license, a business license, a marriage license, in some U.S. states, five year olds, even need to get a license to run a lemonade stand on their front lawn — hypocritically referred to as the ‘rule-of-law’ is a legal world of lawyers, politicians and priests, who prefer to negligently ignore, plausibly deny, or socio-psycho-phallicly benefit from the conquer-and-multiply and divide and conquer control over the means of human reproduction and consumption. It is a Matrix reality, of legal, political and religious indulgence salesmen.

It is a legal world, very similar to the Matrix religious world that existed before Martin Luther confronted the religious indulgence salesmen with his Ninety-Five Theses, on the Church of All Saints, on 31 October 1517, thereby initiating the Protestant Reformation.

In the Catholic Church’s religious Matrix world, only Catholic Bishops were entitled to be interpreters of the ‘word of god’. Only they could decide what God meant, about who was guilty and who was innocent, who would go to hell and who would go to heaven. God did not speak to common people, except via the Catholic Church’s bishops.

In Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix world, only those who swear blind obedience to Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix world – lawyers, prosecutors and judges – are deemed to possess the supposed superior intellectual Legal Godlike capabilities, to decipher, decode and interpret the ‘word of civilized patriarch gods’, hence capable of deciding which of us mere Commons surplus cannon fodder mortals acts of commission, or omission, is ‘lawful’ or ‘unlawful’.

Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix ‘AnthroCorpocentric law’ is based upon Flat Earth ‘jurisprudence’, as per the demands of those capable of purchasing Flat Earth legislation indulgences which make their ecologically – breeding/consumption war — criminal acts, to be deemed as ‘legal/lawful’ conduct by the Legal Matrix Bishops: lawyers, prosecutors and Judges.

It is a Matrix world of legal indulgence salesmen; who — ‘Contempt in Facie Curiae’ — demand the public’s sycophantic submissive obedience; for their supposed superior intellectual Godlike capabilities, to decipher, decode and interpret which of us mere Commons surplus cannon and vote fodder mortals acts of commission, or omission, is ‘lawful’ or ‘unlawful’.

Surplus vote fodder citizens may convert to becoming cannon-fodder citizens by joining the military to commit conquering or culling acts of murder and theft, as long as their murder and theft is sanctioned as a lawful conquer, culling or theft order, by one or more groups of left/right conquer-and-multiply legal indulgence salesmen.

In this Matrix Reality legal world, soldiers tasked with the national security conquering and culling responsibilities, of conquering to thieve another tribe’s resources, and culling population ‘useless eaters’ and ‘oxygen thieves’ surplus population excesses; on behalf of the conquering and culling profiteering demands of civilized patriarchy’s civilian corporate and political elite; constantly find themselves confronted with the conquer-or-culling “Befehl ist Befehl” Catch 22 dilemma:

To obey, or not to obey, a ‘Lebensraum’, ‘Difaqane’, ‘Operation Freedumb’ and the thousands like them, order to conquer or cull; since a lawful conquer or culling order, by one group of left/right conquer-and-multiply legal indulgence salesmen, can easily be reinterpreted to be an unlawful order, by another group of opposing left/right conquer-and multiply legal indulgence salesmen; presenting a Catch 22 dilemma from which there is no legal escape.

One who refuses a ‘lawful’ conquering or culling order will still probably be jailed for refusing orders, and one who accepts an ‘unlawful order will be jailed for committing unlawful culling or conquering acts.

Who decides, what is, and what is not, a conquering or culling lawful, or unlawful order?

The ‘Inalienable Right to Breed’ Matrix Reality conquer-and-multiply indulgence salesmen, with their specious justifications, and nightmare of Legal Matrix reality generated bureaucratic stare-decisis cryptic rules and statutes, of course!

“I don’t know what you mean by ‘glory,’” Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. “Of course you don’t—till I tell you. I meant ‘there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!’”
“But ‘glory’ doesn’t mean ‘a nice knock-down argument’,” Alice objected.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”
— Through the Looking Glass, by Lewis Carroll

Anthropocentric Master’s of ‘Relevance’ Jurisprudence:

The question in a Babylon War is Peace civilized patriarchy court is only concerned with who is the master of one word: ‘relevance’.

Any question or answer that exposes civilized patriarchy’s Legal Matrix system for what it is; a system far more corrupt than the Catholic Church’s Indulgences for Sale religious matrix, is simply deemed as ‘irrelevant’.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges defy the laws of ecology with a massive ‘fuck you’, by legislating, interpreting and enforcing Legal Matrix doctrine, that encourages citizens to breed and consume above cultural carrying capacity limits.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges know that legislation which ignores carrying capacity limits results in ecological overshoot, surplus vote-cannon-fodder populations, economic hierarchical inequality, and scarcity induced local, national and international conflict.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges know that legislation which enables ecological overshoot in multi-cultural/ethnic/religious communities, manifests as inter-cultural / ethnic / religious conflict.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges know that inter-cultural / ethnic conflict is a great divide and conquer tool to manipulate the proletariat to perceive other cultural/ethnic proletariat as the source of their own overshoot-scarcity-conflict misery.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges sit in judgement about an accused’s case of theft or murder; while consciously ignoring the theft and thievery and participation in mass murder of the civilized patriarchy corporate elite, who purchased ‘Innocence for Sale’ Indulgences from legislators to avoid legislation that defines their ecologically criminal acts of billion and trillion dollar thievery and murder as ‘unlawful’.

What is relevant?:

It is relevant that civilized patriarchy’s penis constitutions human factory farming rights to breed and consume, is to be master —that’s all.

Who says so?:

Civilized Patriarchy’s ecologically illiterate Legal Matrix Legislator’s, lawyers, judges and prosecutors ego-genitals say so!
» EoP Leg Sub: 25 Jan: USAR Ft Bragg: Culture Change to EoP Honour Ecofootprint Shrinking Lifeboat Ethics?.

SRA-NL: Perhaps you could respond with further information.

EoP-LJ: If you sincerely require further information, clarify what specific information you require.

I don’t know what your family wants: Ask your wife, daughters, sisters, mother whether they want a Steppe Aryan future or a gang rape future?

Roger Hallam: .. why don’t you do an article on climate change and rape? …. What’s going to be the biggest implication of climate change for women around the world? Ecological collapse means social collapse. And what does that mean? War, the slaughter of men and the rape of women. – Der Spiegel: We Are Engaged in the Murder of the Worlds Children.

Gimbutas noted the stable – no population & economic consumption growth – Steppe Aryan population: that a low tech agrarian village founded in 8000 BC was still a low tech agrarian village in 4000BC. This also allowed them to sustainably farm the land, and live in peace. There are no steppe Aryan palaces, no prisons, no mental institutions, no homeless and no unemployed. No harems; they didnt even have marriage, just as the Musou still today. Among whom, rape & murder are so rare they dont have words for it. – SQSwans: Day Brown: Proto Indo-European: 23 January 2017.
» McVeigh 2020: Return to Eden: EoP – End Civ – UN Resolution.

Direct EoP Pro Se Application: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons & 11 Others [PDF]

Page 03/88:

[B] Request Respondents EoP – Exit Babylon Ecocide Law / Climate & Ecological Emergency – UN Resolution Vote:

An Order confirming: ……..

[C] Notice of Draft: EoP UN Resolution Martial Law:

[I] Applicants Notification to Speaker (01st to 05th) Respondents; Political & Protest Party Leaders (06th – 07th) Respondents; Commonwealth Magistrates & Judges Assoc, Law Society of UK and British and National Union of Journalists (08th to 10th) Respondents; Prime Minister and Chief of Defence (11th& 12th) Respondents; to take notice of: Draft: EoP UN Resolution Martial Law [Annex B.4]; for their EoP TRC or No EoP TRC notification and consideration.
» Direct EoP Pro Se Application: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons & 11 Others [PDF]

Page 85/88:

DRAFT: MilDem EoP UN Resolution Martial Law

[C] EoP TRC: Martial Law to Implement EoP UN Resolution:

[C1] Joint Chiefs/Mil Judges request Presidential Executive Order to establish EoP Axis NatSec Oath legal office requiring: ……….

[C2b] All Lawyers – including military lawyers depending on Military Judges decision in [B1a] – ordered to Sign EoP Axis NatSec Def Oath; to keep their license to continue to practice law.
» Direct EoP Pro Se Application: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons & 11 Others [PDF]

EoP TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson,
Pro Se, EoP Applicant [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529, RSA

Sent per electronic notice to:

Solicitors Regulation Authority: Paul Philip:
Solicitors Regulation Authority (protectlegalusers@sra.org.uk); Contact Center (contactcentre@sra.org.uk); Paul Philip (paul.philip@sra.org.uk); Nicholas Leach (nicholas.leach@sra.org.uk);

Law Society of UK: Simon Davis:
President: Law Society of UK: Simon Davis Ben Davies (ben.davies@lawsociety.org.uk); Harriet Beaumont (harriet.beaumont@lawsociety.org.uk); Liam McCafferty (liam.mccafferty@lawsociety.org.uk); Emma Clarke (emma.clarke@lawsociety.org.uk); Wales (wales@lawsociety.org.uk); Brussels (brussels@lawsociety.org.uk)

Commonwealth Magistrates & Judges Assoc: Karen Brewer:
SecGen: Karen Brewer (info@cmja.org)

MoD: General Carter:
Ministry of Defence: General Sir Nick Carter: MOD Ministerial Correspondence Unit (parlibranch-treat-official@mod.gov.uk); MOD Information Rights Team (cio-foi@mod.gov.uk);

.

_______________________________________
From: Nicholas Leach <Nicholas.Leach@sra.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:52:25 +0000
Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:53:26 +0200
Subject: RE: Upd: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons & 11 Others
To: Lara Johnson <eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za>
Thread-Topic: Upd: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons & 11 Others
Thread-Index: AQHVo9p2N8HME9iCpECrrTnXdWGTSKee6j0w
Message-ID:
<LO2P265MB1502FB9FBC4967B1A33A8E8EAE440@LO2P265MB1502.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <ee83ed38c4614b6c159155f7f8338b1a@tygae.org.za>
In-Reply-To: <ee83ed38c4614b6c159155f7f8338b1a@tygae.org.za>

Dear Lara

Thank you for copying me into your email.

I am not too sure as to the relevance of this email for the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Perhaps you could respond with further information.

Yours sincerely

Nicholas Leach
Investigation Manager
Investigations & Supervision
Solicitors Regulation Authority
0121 329 6228

.

_______________________________________
From: Lara Johnson <eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 23:32:12 +0200
Subject: Upd: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons & 11 Others
To: “Commonwealth Magistrates & Judges Assoc: SecGen: Karen Brewer” <info@cmja.org>, “President: Law Society of UK: Simon Davis Ben Davies” <ben.davies@lawsociety.org.uk>, Harriet Beaumont <harriet.beaumont@lawsociety.org.uk>, Liam McCafferty <liam.mccafferty@lawsociety.org.uk>, Emma Clarke <emma.clarke@lawsociety.org.uk>, Wales <wales@lawsociety.org.uk>, Brussels <brussels@lawsociety.org.uk>, Solicitors Regulation Authority <protectlegalusers@sra.org.uk>, Contact Center <contactcentre@sra.org.uk>, Paul Philip <paul.philip@sra.org.uk>, Nicholas Leach <nicholas.leach@sra.org.uk>, “British Association of Journalists: Matthew Myatt” <office@bajunion.org.uk>, National Union of Journalists <info@nuj.org.uk>, “Michelle Stanistreet: Comms” <communications@nuj.org.uk>, Midlands <nujmanchester@nuj.org.uk>, Scotland <nujscotland@nuj.org.uk>, Ireland <info@nuj.ie>, “Ofcom CEO: Sharon White” <sharon.white@ofcom.org.uk>, Contact Center <ofcomcontactcentre@ofcom.org.uk>, Sophie Richings <Sophie.Richings@ofcom.org.uk>, Jonathan Oxley <jonathan.oxley@ofcom.org.uk>, Media <mediaoffice@ofcom.org.uk>, Polly Weitzman <polly.weitzman@ofcom.org.uk>, Peter Susman QC <psusman@hendersonchambers.co.uk>
Message-ID: <ee83ed38c4614b6c159155f7f8338b1a@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za
Attachment: 19-11-25_LJvSHoC_F-NoEoPTRC.pdf

Sent Separately:
TO: UK Supreme Court: Registry and Judges.
TO: UKSC: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons Respondents:
01: Speaker: House of Commons, 02: Speaker: Scottish Parliament, 03: Speaker: National Assembly for Wales, 04: Speaker: Northern Ireland Assembly, 05: Speaker: London Assembly, 06: Leaders: UK Political Parties, 07: Leader: Extinction Rebellion, 08: Sec Gen: Commonwealth Magistrates & Judges Assoc, 09: President: Law Society of United Kingdom, 10: Gen Sec: British Assoc & National Union of Journalists, 11: Chief of Defence: Ministry of Defence, 11: Prime Minister.
CC: EU Pres Juncker-von der Leyen, Donald Tusk, Frederica Mogherini, Michel Barnier:
Re: Direct EoP Pro Se Application: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons & 11 Others [PDF]

Registrar and Respondents:

Upd: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons & 11 Others.

I have notified EoP Applicants of status of EoP TRC Negotiations filed with George High Court [19 Nov: LJ Notice to EoP Applicants: Status of EoP TRC Negotiations] TC: Judicial Service Commission and Judge Erasmus [20 Nov: LJ Re: H 45/19: LJ v CRLRC: Req for Info: JSC & Judge NC Erasmus].

I shall be submitting a summary of all Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) negotiations cases filed with the George High Court and UK Supreme Court; to H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu and Eight Others [lj-v-ls] Heads of State/Org – Cyril Ramaphosa, Bill Gates, Ueli Maurer, Jean Claude Juncker, Antonio Guterrez, Stuart Peach, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin – respondents for their 16 December 2019 [04 Sep: Sheriff Svc to LJvLS CH-UN-CN-BE-US-RU Amb Resp Deadline extended to 16 Dec 2019] EoP TRC or No EoP TRC decision-making.

Please find enclosed Applicants summary interpretation of LJ v Speaker: House of Commons Respondents correspondence Responses: No EoP TRC [PDF].

EoP TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson,
Pro Se, EoP Applicant [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529, RSA

Sent per electronic notice to:

UK Supreme Court: Registrar: Louise di Mambro:
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom: Registry (registry@supremecourt.uk); Angela Chandler (angela.chandler@supremecourt.uk); Registrar: Louise di Mambro (louise.dimambro@supremecourt.uk); UK Supreme Court Chief Justice Lady Hale via UK Supreme Court (enquiries@supremecourt.uk); Janet Coull Trisic (Janet.Coull-Trisic@supremecourt.uk); Rebecca Lowson (rebecca.lowson@supremecourt.uk)

HoC Speaker Respondents:
Speaker: House of Commons (hcenquiries@parliament.uk);
(speakersoffice@parliament.uk); Peter Hain (peter@peterhain.org); House of Lords Info (hlinfo@parliament.uk); Contact House of Lords Member (contactholmember@parliament.uk); Scottish Parliament (info@parliament.scot); Speaker: Ken Macintosh (PresidingOfficers@parliament.scot); Media (mediarelations@parliament.scot); Tom Freeman (Tom.freeman@parliament.scot); National Assembly of Wales (contact@assembly.wales); Speaker: Elin Jones (Elin.Jones@assembly.wales); Llywydd (Llywydd@assembly.wales); Northern Ireland Assembly (info.office@niassembly.gov.uk); Speaker: Robin Newton: Robin Ramsey (robin.ramsey@niassembly.gov.uk); Frances Leneghan (frances.leneghan@niassembly.gov.uk); London Assembly (suggestaquestion@london.gov.uk); Speaker Chair: Jennette Arnold: Lorraine Ford (lorraine.ford@london.gov.uk); Becky Short (becky.short@london.gov.uk); Paul Watling (paul.watling@london.gov.uk); Grace Pollard (grace.pollard@london.gov.uk);

HoC Party Leader Respondents:
Conservative & Unionist Party (helpdesk@conservatives.com); Boris Johnson (boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk); UxBR Cons (admin@hillingdonconservatives.org); Secretariat (ConservativeGroupSecretariat@hillingdon.gov.uk); Pinner: Nick Hurd (hurdn@parliament.uk); Labour Party: Jeremy Corbyn (leader@labour.org.uk); Jeremy Corbyn (jeremy.corbyn.mp@parliament.uk); Islington North (islingtonnorth@gmail.com); Scottish National Party (info@snp.org); Nicola Sturgeon (Nicola.Sturgeon.msp@parliament.scot); First Minister (FirstMinister@gov.scot); Liberal Democrats (help@libdems.org.uk); Jo Swinson (jo.swinson.mp@parliament.uk); LibDem Leader (leader@libdems.org.uk); Democratic Unionist Party (info@mydup.com); Arlene Foster: Nigel Dodds (doddsn@parliament.uk); Press (pressoffice@dup.org.uk); Sinn Fein (admin@sinnfein.ie); Mary Lou McDonald (marylou.mcdonald@oireachtas.ie); Michelle ONeill (michelle.oneill@mla.niassembly.gov.uk); Independent Group for Change (info@theindependent.group); Anna Soubry (anna.soubry.mp@parliament.uk); Plaid Cymru (post@plaidcymru.org); Adam Price (Adam.Price@assembly.wales); Cerith (cerith@plaid.cymru); Rhydian Fitter (rhydianfitter@plaid.cymru); Green Party of England and Wales (Press@GreenParty.org.uk); Sian Berry & Jonathan Bartley (leader@greenparty.org.uk); Caroline Lucas (caroline.lucas.mp@parliament.uk); Brexit Party (info@thebrexitparty.org); Nigel Farage (nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu); Media (media@thebrexitparty.org); Scottish Green Party (office@scottishgreens.org.uk); Patrick Harvie (patrick.harvie.msp@scottish.parliament.uk); Lorna Slater (Lorna.Slater@scottishgreens.org.uk); Press (press@scottishgreens.org.uk); Social Democratic and Labour Party (info@sdlp.ie); Colum Eastwood (colum.eastwood@sdlp.ie); Dolores Kelly (dolores.kelly@mla.niassembly.gov.uk); Ulster Unionist Party (uup@uup.org); Robin Swann (robin.swann@mla.niassembly.gov.uk); Alliance Party of Northern Ireland (alliance@allianceparty.org); Naomi Long (naomi.long@allianceparty.org); UK Independence Party (mail@ukip.org); Richard Braine (chairman@ukip.org); Green Party of Northern Ireland (info@greenpartyni.org); Clare Bailey (clare.bailey@co.niassembly.gov.uk); Steven Agnew (steven.agnew@mla.niassembly.gov.uk); Press (greenpartynipress@gmail.com); Traditional Unionist Voice: Jim Allister (info@jimallister.org); People Before Profit (info@pbp.ie); Eamonn McCann (derrypeoplebeforeprofit@gmail.com)

XR Protest Party Respondents:
Extinction Rebellion (extinctionrebellion@risingup.org.uk); Roger Hallam (roger.hallam.uk@gmail.com); Organics to Go (organics2go@googlemail.com); XR Roger Hallam (XRRogerH@gmail.com); Gail Bradbrook: Ronan Harrington (ronan@alterego.network); Plan B: Tim Crossland (tim@planb.earth); Sebastian Kaye (Sebastien@planb.earth); Zoe Blackler (xr-legal@riseup.net); Press (press@risingup.org.uk); Bindmans: Mike Schwarz (m.schwarz@bindmans.com); UK Student Climate Network: Anna Taylor (ukstudentsclimatenetwork@gmail.com); Lawyers for XR: Paul (lawyersforxr@protonmail.com); Ben Metz ( mail@benmetz.org); Paul Powlesland (ppowlesland@elyplace.com); Richard Lord QC: Clerks (TonysClerkingTeam@brickcourt.co.uk); Gabrielle Walker (gw@gabriellewalker.com)

MilDem Respondents:
Commonwealth Magistrates & Judges Assoc: SecGen: Karen Brewer (info@cmja.org); President: Law Society of UK: Simon Davis Ben Davies (ben.davies@lawsociety.org.uk); Harriet Beaumont (harriet.beaumont@lawsociety.org.uk); Liam McCafferty (liam.mccafferty@lawsociety.org.uk); Emma Clarke (emma.clarke@lawsociety.org.uk); Wales (wales@lawsociety.org.uk); Brussels (brussels@lawsociety.org.uk); Solicitors Regulation Authority (protectlegalusers@sra.org.uk); Contact Center (contactcentre@sra.org.uk); Paul Philip (paul.philip@sra.org.uk); Nicholas Leach (nicholas.leach@sra.org.uk); British Association of Journalists: Matthew Myatt (office@bajunion.org.uk); National Union of Journalists (info@nuj.org.uk); Michelle Stanistreet: Comms (communications@nuj.org.uk); Midlands (nujmanchester@nuj.org.uk); Scotland (nujscotland@nuj.org.uk): Ireland (info@nuj.ie); Ofcom CEO: Sharon White (sharon.white@ofcom.org.uk); Contact Center (ofcomcontactcentre@ofcom.org.uk); Sophie Richings (Sophie.Richings@ofcom.org.uk); Jonathan Oxley (jonathan.oxley@ofcom.org.uk); Media (mediaoffice@ofcom.org.uk); Polly Weitzman (polly.weitzman@ofcom.org.uk); Peter Susman QC (psusman@hendersonchambers.co.uk); Ministry of Defence: General Sir Nick Carter: MOD Ministerial Correspondence Unit (parlibranch-treat-official@mod.gov.uk); MOD Information Rights Team (cio-foi@mod.gov.uk); UK Prime Minister: Boris Johnson (boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk); Brexit Secretary: Stephen Barclay (stephen.barclay.mp@parliament.uk); Dept of Exiting the EU (correspondence@dexeu.gov.uk); Biz Energy Ind Sec: Andrea Leadsom (andrea.leadsom.mp@parliament.uk); Env Sec: Theresa Villiers (theresa@theresavilliers.co.uk); Counsel: Sir James Eadie QC: Gary Oliver (GaryOliver@blackstonechambers.com); Dave Blundell: Richard Bolton (rbolton@landmarkchambers.co.uk); Christopher Knight (Christopher.Knight@11kbw.com);

EU Pres Juncker-von der Leyen, Donald Tusk, Frederica Mogherini, Michel Barnier:
EU Commission: President Claude Juncker (president.juncker@ec.europa.eu); Ursula von der Leyen: Bjoem Seibert (Bjoern.SEIBERT@ec.europa.eu); Marilena Zammit (Marilena.ZAMMIT@ec.europa.eu); Clara Martinez Alberola (clara.martinez-alberola@ec.europa.eu); Richard Szostak (richard.szostak@ec.europa.eu); Sec Gen: Klaus Welle (klaus.welle@ep.europa.eu); Franck Debie (franckrene.debie@ep.europa.eu); EU Parl Spokesman & Dir Gen Jaume Duch Guillot (jaume.duch@ep.europa.eu); European Council: Donald Tusk: Carla Valtorta (carla.valtorta@consilium.europa.eu); Press Office (press.office@consilium.europa.eu); Federica Mogherini (federica.mogherini@ec.europa.eu); Article 50 Task Force (TF50-contact@ec.europa.eu); Michel Barnier (Michel.Barnier@ec.europa.eu); European Parliament: Antonio Tajani (president@ep.europa.eu)

.

Leave a Comment