01 Dec: LJ Re: Upd: LJ v GH Johnstone & 5 Others

* Frode Moe, Lee Moe, Millers Inc, Arno Crous, Graeme Johnstone, Hilary Johnstone, Brand & van der Berg Attorneys, Desere Barnard, Clive Johnstone, Ann Johnstone.
* 01 Dec: LJ Re: Upd: LJ v GH Johnstone & 5 Others.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v GHJ, LJ v FTM, LJ v CHJ / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: Lara Johnson <eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 13:56:35 +0200
Subject: Upd: H 51/19: LJ v GHJ & 5 Others
To: Frode Moe <fro.moe@online.no>, Lee Moe <lee.moe@telkomsa.net>, “Counsel: Millers Inc: Arno Crous” <arno@millers.co.za>, Graeme Johnstone <graeme.johnstone@gmail.com>, Hilary Johnstone <hilary.johnstone@gmail.com>, “Counsel: Brand & van der Berg Attorneys: Desere Barnard: Rachel Hannies” <rachel@bvdblegal.co.za>
Cc: Clive Johnstone <clann@telkomsa.net>, Ann Johnstone <annscg@telkomsa.net>
Message-ID: <c72df553f9629fd9f253cba4f3436e77@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za
Attachment: 19-11-26_LJvGHJ_NoEoPTRC_Encl.pdf; 19-11-08_LJvCRL_JNErasmus-R4I-Let.pdf; 19-11-08_LJvCRL_JSC_ReqEoP&WiPJudge.pdf.

TO: Frode Moe, Talitha Moe
TO: Graeme Johnstone, Hilary Johnstone
CC: Clive and Ann Johnstone:

Frode, Talitha, Graeme, Hilary:

Upd: H 51/19: LJ v GHJ & 5 Others

Re: 29 Nov: LJ Re: Upd: LJ v GH Johnstone & 5 Others email, that was provided to “Clive and Ann Johnstone, Per Printed Hand Delivery.”

I had a meeting with Clive and Ann Johnstone on Saturday 30 November 2019 at approximately 19:00 hrs, where I provided them with
* a printed copy of Lara Summary interpretation of LJ v GH Johnstone respondents responses: No EoP TRC [PDF],
* a verbal summary of my interpretation of the status of George High Court applications.
* Copy excerpts of Request for Written Reasons to Judge Erasmus and Judicial Service Commission:
» Request for Written Reasons to Judge Erasmus [PDF]
» Request for EoP and WiP Judge to Judicial Service Commission [PDF]

Here follows paraphrased transcript of my verbal summary of my interpretation of the status of George High Court applications to Clive and Ann Johnstone:

George High Court Cases:
I have five cases before the George High Court.
* LJ v CRLRC: Confirm Lara EoP Culture member
* LJ v GHJ: Damages for Mental Disorder allegations, etc.
* LJ v LS: EoP/OKC TRC or No EoP/OKC TRC
* LJ v NMN: Notice of EoP/OKC TRC or No EoP/OKC TRC
* LJ v SGMC: EoP/OKC TRC or No EoP/OKC TRC declaration

Order Cases:
Cases that request the Judge to issue an order that orders respondents to do something, that they have been requested to do voluntarily, but refused, and refuse to provide reasons for their refusal; and that the Judge has the jurisdictional and/or statutory legal authority to order the respondents to do, against their preference:
* LJ v CRLRC: Confirm Lara EoP Culture member who should be provided with In Forma Pauperis standby assistance counsel when dealing with WiP respondents and/or lawyers.
* LJ v GHJ: Formal Apology and/or Financial Damages for Mental Disorder allegations, Notice of US v McVeigh Faked Execution information, etc.

Request Cases:
Cases that request the Judge to issue an order that confirms that respondents were provided with a written formal request, via a legal application, to voluntarily do something, and that the respondents declined the request. The judge does not have jurisidictional and/or legal authority to order the respondents to do what I am requesting them to voluntarily do, but the judge does have jurisdictional and/or legal authority to confirm in writing that I did provide the respondents with information and request the respondents to voluntarily do something, and that the respondents declined.
* LJ v LS: EoP/OKC TRC or No EoP/OKC TRC
* LJ v NMN: Notice of EoP/OKC TRC or No EoP/OKC TRC
* LJ v SGMC: EoP/OKC TRC or No EoP/OKC TRC declaration

LJ v CRLRC & LJ v GHJ:
* Judge Erasmus 01 Nov 2019: LJ v CRLRC – Lara EoP culture – dismissal ruling
* Judge Erasmus – Lara EoP culture – dismissal ruling is similar to Pope Leo’s decision with regard to Martin Luthers Ninety-Five Theses criticism of Pope Leo X’s religious courts selling of ‘Gods forgiveness for sale for their sins’ indulgences. Ecology of Peace legal criticism of the secular – innocence / guilty – legal system is similar to Martin Luthers criticism of the religious – innocence / guilty – legal system. Some Bishops and priests welcomed Martin Luthers criticism of the Pope Leo’s religious legal system and others, including Pope Leo X, did not. Judge Erasmus appears to be a Pope Leo X Bishop.
* Effect of Judge Erasmus 01 Nov 2019 dismissal ruling on other EoP culture application cases, particularly with regard to access to standby legal representation – a lawyer who will provide legal assistance to make sure legal application documents formatting is accurate – where respondents and/or their lawyers focus not on the merits of the EoP culture application, but alledge there are errors in the EoP application legal procedure: such as in the case of Frode, Graeme, Talitha and Hilary, who want to avoid the merits – their mental disorder allegations – by saying that the application was incorrectly filed.
* Request for Written Reasons to Judge Erasmus for his dismissal ruling
* Request for an EoP and WiP Judge to Judicial Service Commission
* As of date no response from Judge Erasmus or the Judicial Service Commission.

H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu:
* I have compiled a summary of all EoP cases to be submitted to LJ v LSisulu Heads of State Respondents for their 16 December 2019 authorization of ‘EoP TRC: EoP UN Resolution’ or ‘No EoP TRC: Lara and Tim Siberia Assisted Suicide’ decisionmaking.
* I don’t know who made the US government decision to fake McVeigh’s execution: whether George W Bush or Generals in the Pentagon.
* I do know that McVeigh’s execution was faked, which was confirmed by Michael Martin, McVeigh’s commanding offider, and that George W Bush admitted it was faked when asked by Gov Gray Davis, as per my request and feedback from Gov Davis Secret Service officer: Steve West.
* If the decision was made by George W Bush, based upon my OKC TRC or No OKC TRC request to him, on behalf of Timothy, then obviously President Bush could have issued an Executive Order to make such OKC TRC or No OKC TRC enquiry, while he was President. He did not. If the original faked execution was made by Pentagon generals, then they would have to get the President and/or Congress to authorize such OKC TRC or No OKC TRC enquiry. If they are obstructed by the President and/or Congress, then the only thing I can do is to provide Pentagon Generals with written confirmation that Congress and the US President were provided with a written request to address the underlying OKC TRC or No OKC TRC issues [EoP v Babylon WiP law]; and/or to hold an OKC TRC or No OKC TRC enquiry [EoP TRC or No EoP TRC], and both Congress and US President refused; which effectively provides them with some written – No OKC TRC: Lara & Tim Siberia Assisted Suicide – authorization; to authorize McVeigh’s release and negotiations with South African officials and Russian officials for No OKC/EoP TRC: Lara and Tim’s Siberia Assisted Suicide.
* So I shall submit a summary of all Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) negotiations cases filed with the George High Court to H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu and Eight Others [lj-v-ls: PDF] Heads of State/Org – Cyril Ramaphosa, Bill Gates, Ueli Maurer, Jean Claude Juncker, Antonio Guterrez, Stuart Peach, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin – respondents for their 16 December 2019: OKC/EoP TRC: EoP UN Resolution or No OKC/EoP TRC: Lara & Tim Siberia Assisted Suicide authorization decision-making.

An Order confirming Respondents – on behalf of the organization or Head of State they represent – Consent / Edit / Objection Response to:

[A] Authorize EoP PoW TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War Negotiations:
Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End Abel and Kane Cold War negotiations to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law; by process of EoP UN Resolution; to [A] enable responsible freedom orderly and humane – de-industrialization and depopulation, prisoner release, land reform and denuclearization – shut down of the WiP Ponzi Swamp economy; [B] require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; [C] nationalize all property and provide all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) with cultural law self rule homelands for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration land reform to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

[B] If EoP TRC: Authorize EoP – Sustainable Security / Climate Change & Ecological Overshoot Emergency – UN Resolution:
Ecology of Peace recommended: [A] UN Security Council and General Assembly Resolution to Implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law; [B] Suggested Amendment to Crime of Aggression Definition of Rome Statute of International Criminal Court.

[C] If No EoP TRC: Authorize US v McVeigh Siberia PoW Suicide:
Logistics: (a) Respondent Lapenn on behalf of Respondent NSA: Gen Paul Nakasone and/or Timothy McVeigh’s NSA superior; authorizing the release of Timothy McVeigh to travel to South Africa and to Russia with applicant for their joint assisted suicide in Siberia; (b) Respondent Lapenn and Respondent Petrakov on behalf of Respondent NSA Dir Gen Paul Nakasone and Respondent FSB Dir Gen Alexander Bortnikov negotiating the authorized release of Timothy McVeigh to travel to South Africa and to Russia with applicant for their joint assisted suicide in Siberia; (c) Respondent Sisulu authorizing a visa for Timothy McVeigh to travel to Russia via South Africa; (d) Respondent Petrakov issuing a visa for Applicant and Timothy McVeigh to travel to Russia for their assisted suicide departure in unmarked graves in the Siberian wilderness.

Documents provided to Clive and Ann:
Ann requested the documents be provided to Clive.

Documents provided to Clive:
* Lara Summary interpretation of LJ v GH Johnstone respondents responses: No EoP TRC [PDF].
* Excerpts of Request for Written Reasons to Judge Erasmus and Judicial Service Commission:
» Request for Written Reasons to Judge Erasmus [PDF]
» Request for EoP and WiP Judge to Judicial Service Commission [PDF]

EoP TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson,
Pro Se, EoP Applicant [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529, RSA

Sent per electronic notice to:

Frode Moe, Talitha Moe, Millers Inc: Arno Crous:
Frode Moe (fro.moe@online.no); Lee Moe (lee.moe@telkomsa.net); Counsel: Millers Inc: Arno Crous (arno@millers.co.za)

Graeme Johnstone, Hilary Johnstone, Brand & vdBerg: Desere Barnard:
Graeme Johnstone (graeme.johnstone@gmail.com); Hilary Johnstone (hilary.johnstone@gmail.com); Counsel: Brand & van der Berg Attorneys: Desere Barnard: Rachel Hannies (rachel@bvdblegal.co.za)

Clive Johnstone, Ann Johnstone:
Clive Johnstone (clann@telkomsa.net); Ann Johnstone (annscg@telkomsa.net)

.

2 Comments

    1. […] H 51/19: LJ v GH Johnstone & 5 Others [PDF: PoS: 29 Nov; 01 Dec]:
      » Graeme Johnstone, Hilary Johnstone, Frode Moe, Talitha Moe, Clive Johnstone, Ann Johnstone, […]

Leave a Comment