* National Conservative Party, Rod Jeanneret.
* 24 Dec: LJ v SGMC Notice to CNP: Rod Jeanneret.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v AU Political Parties / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Axis MilNec Evac: EoP Axis: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 13:24:22 +0200
Subject: LJ v SGMC Notice to CNP: Rod Jeanneret
To: Rod Jeanneret <email@example.com>, Rod Jeanneret <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Conservative National Party <email@example.com>
TO: Rod Jeanneret:
CC: Conservative National Party:
LJ v SGMC Notice to CNP: Rod Jeanneret.
I received your 24 Dec 2019 email [24 Dec: NCP-RJ: Re: LJ v SGMC Notice to AU 2019 Rep Candidates] in response to my 24 Dec 2019 email [24 Dec: LJ v SGMC Notice to AU Climate Action Firefighters / Australia Climate Council / Darebin Mayor and Cllrs]; where you state: “You are treasonous parasites. Stick your notice where it fits tightest, then light it!”
Your response sounds like a – privileged [eop-v-wip-privilege] white male incapable of wanna fuck radical honesty – presumably cause your tits and ass slut cannon fodder broodsow wife doesn’t give blowjobs, let alone multi-orgasm blowjobs / privileged white male too fucking lazy to fucking read and ask questions before drawing a conclusion as to whether your interpretation of any statement is accurate or not – aka lack of ego literacy [PDF: ego-eco-literacy | lj-v-sgmc: PDF: ego literacy: pp.34-35/56] character – emotional objection response.
I think Blanton devised Radical Honesty partly as a way to pick up women. It’s a brilliant strategy. The antithesis of mind games. Transparent mating. And according to Blanton, it’s effective. He tells me about a woman he once met on a Paris subway and asked out for tea. When they sat down, he said, “I didn’t really want any tea; I was just trying to figure out a way to delay you so I could talk to you for a while, because I want to go to bed with you.” They went to bed together. Or another seduction technique of his: “Wanna fuck?” “That works?” I asked. “Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t, but it’s the creation of possibility.” – Esquire: I Think You’re Fat [SQ Copy]; The Most Honest Conversation in the World [SQ Copy]; SHO: And Nothing but the Truth: Brad Blanton; Radical Honesty Channel: The Importance of Telling the Radical Truth. [EoP RH FR: Caveat].
If that is an inaccurate interpretation of your response. My apologies.
If your response was a scientific legal response: please provide your village idiot scientific legal definition for ‘treason’ and ‘parasite’ and clarify your evidence in support of such definition.
If objections are village idiot – layman objective reality [example: eop-rh-fr] – scientifically based, if your village idiot evidence is scientifically superior to EoP village idiot evidence; the appropriate EoP village idiot facts in EoP UN Resolution will be amended by Applicant; in accordance with the superior village idiot evidence.
» EoP Leg Sub: 24 Dec: LJ v SGMC Notice to AU Climate Action Firefighters / Australia Climate Council / Darebin Mayor and Cllrs
Mainstream treason and parasite definitions:
* the crime of betraying one’s country, especially by attempting to kill or overthrow the sovereign or government.
* the action of betraying someone or something.
* the crime of murdering someone to whom the murderer owed allegiance, such as a master or husband.
* an organism that lives in or on an organism of another species (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the other’s expense.
If your village idiot treason and/or parasite definitions and evidence in support of such definitions clarify any errors in EoP village idiot facts in EoP UN Resolution; such facts will be amened by applicant in accordance with the superior village idiot evidence.
EoP UN Resolution: Re: Treason and Parasitism:
EoP UN Resolution does not include a treason and/or parasite definition.
The closest definition to treason in EoP UN Resolution would be a conscious and intentional – procreation, consumption and/or deception – Crime of Aggression [PDF: crimes-of-aggression | lj-v-sgmc: PDF: crime of aggression: pp.31-33/56].
EoP SciCult law penalty for conscious and intentional – procreation, consumption and/or deception – crime of aggression is physical death.
Individuals found guilty of intentional crime/s of aggression; shall be provided the opportunity to (a) choose their preferred method of state assisted suicide by a date as stipulated by the sentencing judge; (b) if the individual had not honourably removed themselves from the planetary genepool by their preferred method of state assisted suicide; by the required date, they would be humanely assassinated.
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Sep: Court Filing: LJ v Speaker: George Council & Four Others [PDF]
EoP SciCult law penalty for unconscious and unintentional aka negligent – procreation, consumption and/or deception – crime of aggression is penussy ego identity death. Individuals found guilty of negligent – procreation, consumption and/or deception – crimes of aggression will be required – among others – to attend Ego / Eco literacy responsible freedom procreation, consumption and/or relating education [lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.19-38; 41-42, 44-48/56] classes; to enable them to learn to practice responsible freedom procreation, consumption and relating.
EoP TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529
Sent per electronic notice to:
Conservative National Party: Rod Jeanneret:
Conservative National Party (firstname.lastname@example.org); Rod Jeanneret (email@example.com); Rod Jeanneret (firstname.lastname@example.org)