11 Jan: LJvLS-EU Q Re: DCAF/Megxit definition of objective reality progressive.

* Sussex Royals, Schillings, Keith Schilling, Daniel Warner, DCAF: Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, Royal Family, Harbottle & Lewis, Catherine Bedford, Prince Charles, Payne Hicks Beach, Fiona Schackleton, The Justice Desk, Halo Trust, Louise Vaughan, Queens Commonwealth Trust, Sentebale, African Parks, YES: Youth Empowerment Service, The Atlantic, Tom McTague, Royal Correspondents, British Association of Journalists, Matthew Myatt, National Union of Journalists, Michelle Stanistreet, Ofcom, Jonathan Oxley, Peter Susman QC, Greta Thunberg, School Strike, Janine OKeefe, European Climate Foundation, Daniel Donner, Fridays for Future, Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, Angela Chandler, Louise di Mambro, Lady Hale, Janet Coull Trisic, Rebecca Lowson, EU Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, Klaus Welle, Jaume Duch Guillot, European Council, Charles Michel, Article 50 Task Force, Michel Barnier, European Parliament, David Sassoli, Marcus Cornaro, EU Delegation in SA
* 11 Jan: LJvLS-EU Q Re: DCAF/Megxit definition of objective reality progressive.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v UK Royal Family, EoP v EU Oligarchs, LJ v Speaker: HoC, EoP v Greta Thunberg, EoP v EU President, EoP v EU Parliament, EoP v TF50 Brexit, LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMUK, EoP NTE GMG | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Psych, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 14:22:59 +0200
Subject: LJvLS-EU Q Re: DCAF/Megxit definition of objective reality progressive
To: “Sussex Royals: Counsel: Schillings: Keith Schilling” <keith.schilling@schillingspartners.com>, Christopher Mills <christopher.mills@schillingspartners.com>, Rod Christie-Miller <rod.christie-miller@schillingspartners.com>, “Daniel Warner: via DCAF: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces” <info@dcaf.ch>, Intnl Security Sector Advisory <contact@issat.dcaf.ch>
Cc: “EU Commission: President Ursula von der Leyen” <ec-president-vdl@ec.europa.eu>, Bjoern Seibert <Bjoern.SEIBERT@ec.europa.eu>, Marilena Zammit <Marilena.ZAMMIT@ec.europa.eu>, Alisa James <Alisa.JAMES@ec.europa.eu>, “Sec Gen: Klaus Welle” <klaus.welle@ep.europa.eu>, Franck Debie <franckrene.debie@ep.europa.eu>, EU Parl Spokesman & Dir Gen Jaume Duch Guillot <jaume.duch@ep.europa.eu>, “European Council: Charles Michel: Carla Valtorta” <carla.valtorta@consilium.europa.eu>, Press Office <press.office@consilium.europa.eu>, Article 50 Task Force <TF50-contact@ec.europa.eu>, Michel Barnier <Michel.Barnier@ec.europa.eu>, “European Parliament: David Sassoli” <president@ep.europa.eu>, “Marcus Cornaro: Ambassador: EU Delegation in SA” <Delegation-S-Africa@eeas.europa.eu>
Message-ID: <dd61b3f1336e33346014d596bd1d8c58@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: 19-07-23_SRS-06_EU-Cornaro_NoM-Afd-Encl.pdf
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 14:29:03 +0200
Subject: Royal Fam: Counsel: Harbottle & Lewis: LJvLS-EU Q Re: DCAF/Megxit definition of objective reality progressive
To: “Royal Family: Counsel: Harbottle & Lewis” <info@harbottle.com>, Catherine Bedford <catherine.bedford@harbottle.com>, Robert Porter <Robert.porter@harbottle.com>, Daniel Tozer <Daniel.Tozer@harbottle.com>, Lawrence Abramson <lawrence.abramson@harbottle.com>, Gary Ashford <gary.ashford@harbottle.com>
Message-ID: <7eb2c19addac3deb76095c585bf87c59@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 14:30:04 +0200
Subject: Prince Charles: PHB Counsel: LJvLS-EU Q Re: DCAF/Megxit definition of objective reality progressive
To: “Prince Charles: Counsel: Payne Hicks Beach” <enquiries@phb.co.uk>, Fiona Schackleton <fshackleton@phb.co.uk>
Message-ID: <716622885f14e7ac43b3e248053f1186@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 14:31:46 +0200
Subject: Harry & Megan African Journey Charities: LJvLS-EU Q Re: DCAF/Megxit definition of objective reality progressive
To: “Sussex Royals & Royal Family African Charities: The Justice Desk” <info@justicedesk.org>, “Halo Trust: Louise Vaughan” <louise.vaughan@halotrust.org>, Queens Commonwealth Trust <info@qct.org.uk>, Press <press@qct.org.uk>, Sentebale <info@sentebale.org>, African Parks <info@africanparks.org>, “YES: Youth Empowerment Service” <corporatesupport@yes4youth.co.za>
Message-ID: <a06b7801c07b9de84be98cd7722a1e8b@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 14:33:44 +0200
Subject:Tom McTague: The Hypocrisy of Harry and Megans Decision
To: “The Atlantic: Tom McTague” <tmctague@theatlantic.com>
Message-ID: <106372fb1d3bfcb8cf1a30bc0b2f246f@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 14:35:06 +0200
Subject: BAJ & NUJ Royal Corr’s: LJvLS-EU Q Re: DCAF/Megxit definition of objective reality progressive
To: “Royal Correspondents via British Association of Journalists: Matthew Myatt” <office@bajunion.org.uk>, National Union of Journalists <info@nuj.org.uk>, “Michelle Stanistreet: Comms” <communications@nuj.org.uk>, Midlands <nujmanchester@nuj.org.uk>, Scotland <nujscotland@nuj.org.uk>, Ireland <info@nuj.ie>, Ofcom Contact Center <ofcomcontactcentre@ofcom.org.uk>, Jonathan Oxley <jonathan.oxley@ofcom.org.uk>, Media <mediaoffice@ofcom.org.uk>, Sophie Richings <Sophie.Richings@ofcom.org.uk>, Polly Weitzman <polly.weitzman@ofcom.org.uk>, Peter Susman QC <psusman@hendersonchambers.co.uk>
Message-ID: <a8ddc269af3044fc540bfd3aa4869055@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 14:37:25 +0200
Subject: EoP Re: Daniel Warner: Re: Greta Thunbergs Progressive Message
To: Greta Thunberg <GretaThunbergMedia@gmail.com>, “School Strike: Janine OKeefe” <info@fores.se>, “European Climate Foundation: Daniel Donner” <daniel.donner@europeanclimate.org>, “Fridays for Future: International” <international.media@fridaysforfuture.org>, Media <swe.media@fridaysforfuture.org>
Message-ID: <a54899aebdc8970f4ce0d2ee2805ef9f@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 14:38:56 +0200
Subject: UKSC: LJvLS-EU Q Re: DCAF/Megxit definition of objective reality progressive
To: “The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom: Registry” <registry@supremecourt.uk>, Angela Chandler <angela.chandler@supremecourt.uk>, “Registrar: Louise di Mambro” <louise.dimambro@supremecourt.uk>, UK Supreme Court Chief Justice Lady Hale via UK Supreme Court <enquiries@supremecourt.uk>, Janet Coull Trisic <Janet.Coull-Trisic@supremecourt.uk>, Rebecca Lowson <rebecca.lowson@supremecourt.uk>
Message-ID: <15513d69081045741ce4db92ec2944c3@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za

.

Sent Separately:
TO: Sussex Royals: Harry & Megan Windsor
TO: DCAF: Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces: Daniel Warner
CC: Royal Family: Queen Elizabeth, Prince Charles et al:
CC: Sussex Royals & Royal Family African Charities:
CC: Greta Thunberg, Tom McTague, BAJ & NUJ Royal Correspondents:
CC:: UK Supreme Court: Registrar: Louise di Mambro:
CC: Ursula von der Leyen, Charles Michel, Michel Barnier, David Sassoli:
Re: Sussex Royals: AboutMedia; FFTV: Harry and Meghan African Journey; Tom McTague: The Hypocrisy of Harry and Megan’s Decision; Daniel Warner: Where’s the Progressive Message? Whose the Messenger?.

Sussex Royals & Daniel Warner:

LJvLS-EU Q Re: DCAF/Megxit definition of objective reality progressive.

Sussex Royals: “After many months of reflection and internal discussions, we have chosen to make a transition this year in starting to carve out a progressive new role within this institution. ….. In the spring of 2020, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will be adopting a revised media approach to ensure diverse and open access to their work. This adjustment will be a phased approach as they settle into the new normality of their updated roles.  This updated approach aims to: * Engage with grassroots media organisations and young, up-and-coming journalists; * Invite specialist media to specific events/engagements to give greater access to their cause-driven activities, widening the spectrum of news coverage; * Provide access to credible media outlets focused on objective news reporting to cover key moments and events. – Sussex Royals: About,  Media; via The Atlantic: The Hypocrisy of Harry and Megan’s Decision.

Daniel Warner: Is it necessary to be a Greta to get a message across? This is the crux of the matter. For if we turn to those who were successful in getting messages across, the simplicity of the message is clear. And, Greta’s simple message about the environment reflects the simplicity of her personality. Greta and her message are not rocket science. … Where is the progressive message and who is the messenger today? These are simple questions, not to be answered by fancy PR communication strategies or rebranding. – Counterpunch: Where’s the Progressive Message? Whose the Messenger?.

I don’t know what your definitions are for ‘progressive’ objective reality, with regard to ‘objective news reporting’. As of date Ecology of Peace village idiot objective reality science simple Q’s to Greta Thunberg have been ignored [24 Sep: EoP Req for – United Science – Info to SY Team Malizia]

If your ism endorses WiP law [eop-v-wip-law]; it’s a Babylon imperialist WiP ism [eop-v-wip-ism] cultural ideology. .. The excesses of capitalism, communism, progressivism, libertarianism, Stalinism, Leninism, Thatcherims, etc are a symptom of Babylon Masonic War is Peace – right to breed & consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits – clauses of international law. EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw] could be described as the place where capitalism, communism, progressivism, libertarianism, Stalinism, Leninism, Thatcherim, etc meet deep green ecology root cause problem solving.
» EoP Leg Sub: 29 Dec: McVeigh2020 Re: Seth Moulton: Bipartisan Bills Waiting on US Senate.

Ecology of Peace culture’s legal definition of objective reality:

Ecology of Peace Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Transforming the World Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors:

Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr] and EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw] are EoP culture’s functional group shared system of thought and action frame of orientation and object of inter-species relating devotion interpretation of reality for individuals whose object of devotion/values include: (i) honest – race, religious, gender and cultural – relationships; (ii) an ecological carrying capacity based perspective of observable factual social contract reality; and (iii) non-violent cooperative root cause problem solving.

* Objective Factual Reality:
[1] Earth is not flat.
[2] Resources are finite.
[3] When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.
[4] Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: climate change, mass migration, poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
[5] The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Babylon Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.

* Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior: Interpretative Reality:
[6] If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy [ego-eco-literacy] – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate [eop-cooperator] to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw] clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 May: LJ v LS Court Filing: NoM Afd & EoP UN Res [PDF] EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [PDF]; EoP Footprint [PDF]; EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [PDF]

There is only one Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) media publication [eop-leg-sub; funded by sqworms] globally, which happens to be in Southern Cape, South Africa.

All other mainstream and alternative media publications in South Africa and globally are essentially Babylon War is Peace media publications [eop-v-wip-media]. EoP media publications and charity values [eop-v-wip-charity] are based on EoP law, and WiP media publications and charity values are consciously or unconsciously based upon WiP law [eop-v-wip-law].

EoP Application to UK Supreme Court: LJ v SHoC:

An Ecology of Peace – EoP TRC or WiP Babylon vote – legal application – was filed in 2019 with the UK Supreme Court [lj-v-shoc: 07 Oct: EoP Req for Info UKSC Registry Filing: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons et al]. Respondents included: Speaker: House of Commons, Speaker: Scottish Parliament, Speaker: National Assembly for Wales, Speaker: Northern Ireland Assembly, Speaker: London Assembly, Leaders: UK Political Parties, Leader: Extinction Rebellion, Sec Gen: Commonwealth Magistrates & Judges Assoc, President: Law Society of United Kingdom, Gen Sec: British Assoc & National Union of Journalists, Chief of Defence: Ministry of Defence, Prime Minister.

The founding affidavit included the following summary definition of EoP v WiP Law:

[20] Ecology of Peace Court, Law, Application and Elections [Annex A.3]:
[20.1] An ‘EoP Only’ Court only accepts applications from individuals who are consciously members of Ecology of Peace cultures.
[20.2] EoP – aka Garden of Eden – law clearly, simply and unequivocally requires citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to avoid ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.
[20.3] EoP culture legal applications advocate on behalf of [A] implementing EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law; and/or [B] if implemented as national or international law: enforcing EoP Scientific and Cultural law.
[20.4] An EoP election or referendum is any local, regional, or national political election or referendum based upon EoP national or international law. Politicians and voters taking part in EoP elections and referendums are legally prohibited from covertly and/or overtly bribing each other by promising and/or demanding individual or corporate innocence for sale indulgences – legislated innocence from breeding/consumption crimes of aggression externalities – legislative welfare.
[21] Babylon War is Peace (“WiP”) Court, Law, Application and Elections:
[21.1] A Babylon ‘WiP Only’ court only accepts applications from individuals who are consciously or unconsciously members of Babylon WiP cultures.
[21.2] Babylon WiP law consciously or unconsciously, negligently or intentionally allows citizens to procreate and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; resulting in ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.
[21.3] Babylon WiP culture legal applications consciously or unconsciously, advocate on behalf of [A] implementing Babylon WiP law as national or international law; and/or [B] if implemented as national or international law: enforcing Babylon WiP law.
[21.4] A Babylon WiP election or referendum is any local, regional, or national political election or referendum based upon Babylon WiP clauses of national or international law. Politicians and voters taking part in Babylon WiP elections and referendums consciously or unconsciously covertly and/or overtly bribe each other by promising and/or demanding individual or corporate innocence for sale indulgences – legislated innocence from breeding/consumption crimes of aggression externalities – legislative welfare.
[22] EoP and WiP Court:
[22.1] An EoP and WiP Court accepts applications from individuals who are consciously or unconsciously members of Ecology of Peace and/or Babylon WiP cultures.
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 Oct: EoP Req for Info UKSC Registry Filing: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons et al

The orders requested from the court and respondents:

[A] Request ‘EoP and WiP’ or ‘WiP Only” Court Legal Certainty Clarity:
An Order:
[I] Consenting to Applicant Ecology of Peace standing [Annex A.1 & A.2] in this court, thereby confirming UKSC as a temporary EoP and WiP court [Annex A.3]; or
[II] Alternatively: Confirm UKSC as a WiP Only court.

[B] Request Respondents EoP – Exit Babylon Ecocide Law / Climate & Ecological Emergency – UN Resolution Vote:
An Order confirming:
[I] All Respondents Receipt of Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) Truth and Reconciliation (“TRC”) – Exit Babylon Ecocide Law (“Exit”) – UN Resolution negotiations enclosed [Annex B & C] documentation; excerpts of H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu application requesting EoP – Exit Babylon Ecocide Law / Climate & Ecological Emergency – UN Resolution to be submitted to UN General Assembly to authorize EoP Scientific and Cultural law be implemented as binding international law.
[II] Applicants Request to Speaker (01st to 05th) Respondents to consent to ‘EoP TRC Exit’ and submit EoP UN Resolution [Annex B.3] documentation to their legislative council requesting their AYE: Consent or NAY: Object vote with regard to Ecology of Peace – Exit Babylon Ecocide Law / Climate and Ecological Emergency – UN Resolution Declaration [Annex C].
[III] Applicants Request to Leaders of UK Political Parties and Extinction Rebellion (06th to 07th) Respondents to consent to ‘EoP TRC Exit’ and submit EoP UN Resolution [Annex B.3] documentation to their political and protest party membership requesting their AYE: Consent or NAY: Object vote with regard to Ecology of Peace – Exit Babylon Ecocide Law / Climate and Ecological Emergency – UN Resolution Declaration [Annex C].

[C] Notice of Draft: EoP UN Resolution Martial Law:
[I] Applicants Notification to Speaker (01st to 05th) Respondents; Political & Protest Party Leaders (06th – 07th) Respondents; Commonwealth Magistrates & Judges Assoc, Law Society of UK and British and National Union of Journalists (08th to 10th) Respondents; Prime Minister and Chief of Defence (11th& 12th) Respondents; to take notice of: Draft: EoP UN Resolution Martial Law [Annex B.4]; for their EoP TRC or No EoP TRC notification and consideration.
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 Oct: EoP Req for Info UKSC Registry Filing: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons et al

The UK Royal Family were notified – per electronic transparency copy email to Royal Family: Prince Charles: Counsel: Payne Hicks Beach (enquiries@phb.co.uk); Fiona Schackleton (fshackleton@phb.co.uk) – of the EoP applicants response to the UK Supreme Court Registrar dismissal of the application [10 Oct: LJ Re: UKSC-LdM: UKSC is WiP Only Court subject to LJvSHoC & RvPM Consent]. As of date none of the respondents, nor Prince Charles or his counsel objected to the UKSC dismissal of the EoP application, confirming UK law as WiP Only law.

The respondents – and Ofcom and the Solicitors Regulation Authority – were notified of the respondents unanimous No EoP TRC: Babylon WiP vote [25 Nov: LJ Upd: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons & 11 Others to be submitted to H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu and Eight Others [lj-v-ls] Heads of State/Org – Cyril Ramaphosa, Bill Gates, Ueli Maurer, Jean Claude Juncker, Antonio Guterrez, Stuart Peach, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin – respondents for EoP TRC or No EoP TRC decision-making.

I don’t know why the UK WiP media declined to inform their readers and British citizens of EoP law application to the UK Supreme Court, or the UKSC registrars response. Presumably for similar reasons South African WiP media decline to inform their readers and South Africans citizens of EoP law applications to South African courts [22 Nov: EoP submission to SANEF Inquiry into Media Ethics and Credibility; 30 Dec: LJ v SGMC-SWCPP Notice to Cape Times & George Herald Editors]. What those conscious or unconscious Babylon WiP media editors and journalists reasons are, I have not a fucking clue. Presumably non-existent or varying degrees of lack of ego and eco literacy [ego-eco-literacy] character.

McVeigh 2020 & Speaker: WCPP Transparency Notice:

Ecology of Peace (“EoP”)/ Oklahoma City Bombing (“OKC”) Truth and Reconciliation (“TRC”) Transparency Notice on behalf of LJ v SGMC Respondent: Speaker of the Western Cape Provincial Legislature: Masizole Mnqasela [14 Dec: H 225/19: LJ v SGMC: S-WCPP EoP UN Res Decl Vote deadline: 10 Feb 2020].

McVeigh 2020: EoP – End Economic Apartheid: Exit Babylon Ecocide Law: Climate and Ecological Emergency: Global One Child Law – UN Resolution US Presidential Candidate:

McVeigh 2020: Gimbutas noted the stable – no population & economic consumption growth – Steppe Aryan population: that a low tech agrarian village founded in 8000 BC was still a low tech agrarian village in 4000BC. This also allowed them to sustainably farm the land, and live in peace. There are no steppe Aryan palaces, no prisons, no mental institutions, no homeless, no landless and no unemployed. No harems; they didnt even have marriage, just as the Musou still today. Among whom, rape & murder are so rare they dont have words for it. – SQSwans: Day Brown: Proto Indo-European: 23 January 2017.
» McVeigh 2020: Return to Eden: EoP – End Civ – UN Resolution.

McVeigh 2020 Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) – aka Return to Steppe Aryan Eden – US Presidential Write In Candidate [mcveigh2020: Write In Candidate PDF: EoP UN Resolution PDF] platform policy is to authorize EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.13-54/56; lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law; to [A] enable responsible freedom orderly and humane – de-industrialization and depopulation, prisoner release, land reform and denuclearization – shut down of the WiP Ponzi Swamp economy; [B] require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; [C] nationalize all property and provide all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) with cultural law self rule homelands for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration land reform to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized lowtech organic agrarian sustainable future.

EoP – Climate and Ecological Emergency – UN Resolution [PDF] is based upon among others the work of scientists: Tim Garrett: Only Collapse of Industrial economy will Prevent Climate Catastrophe [Utah News Center: Is Global Warming Unstoppable?; SQ Copy] and Paul Murtaugh: Every child increases a parents carbon footprint by a factor of 20 [Oregon Univ: Family Planning a Major Environemental Emphasis; SQ Copy].

Speaker: WCPP to hold EoP – End Economic Apartheid: Exit Babylon Ecocide Law: Climate and Ecological Emergency: Global One Child Law – UN Resolution Vote:

The Speaker of the Western Cape Provincial Parliament Legislature: Masizole Mnqasela has consented to Applicants EoP legal application request [PDF: 18 Sep: Court Filing: LJ v Speaker: George Council & Four Others] that Speaker submit EoP UN Resolution documentation to WCPP Councillors for their EoP TRC or No EoP TRC Vote [PDF: 13 Dec: SWCPP: Withdrawal of Notice to Oppose; 14 Dec: H 225/19: LJ v SGMC: S-WCPP EoP UN Res Decl Vote deadline: 10 Feb 2020].

Request for Respondents EoP TRC or No EoP TRC Vote Information:
An Order confirming:
[I] All Respondents Receipt of Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) Truth and Reconciliation (“TRC”) UN Resolution negotiations documentation; submitted to H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu Respondents requesting EoP UN Resolution to be submitted to UN General Assembly to authorize EoP Scientific and Cultural law be implemented as binding international law.
[II] Applicants Request to “Speaker” Respondents to submit EoP UN Resolution documentation to their local, municipal, provincial, national and/or Pan African legislative council members requesting their AYE: Consent or NAY: Object vote with regard to Ecology of Peace – Climate and Ecological Emergency – UN Resolution Declaration. EoP UN Resolution Declarations to be filed in H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu proceedings.

[11] An Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) climate emergency declaration is based on EoP law. A Babylon War is Peace (“WiP”) climate emergency declaration consciously or unconsciously is based on Babylon WiP law.

[11.1] Ecology of Peace – aka Garden of Eden – law clearly, simply and unequivocally enforces existing – and/or advocates on behalf of implementing – EoP international law requiring citizens to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; to avoid ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.

[11.2] Babylon War is Peace law consciously or unconsciously, negligently or intentionally enforces existing Babylon WiP international law allowing citizens to procreate and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits; resulting in ecological overshoot and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict.

[Council Name] Ecology of Peace UN Resolution Declaration

Motion: This house declares its [consent/objection] to Applicants H 111/19: LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu Ecology of Peace UN Resolution draft text and definitions [pp.42]; to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law based on EoP Footprint as binding international law; to enable Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End Abel and Kane Cold War to [A] enable responsible freedom orderly and humane – de-industrialization and depopulation, prisoner release, land reform and denuclearization – shut down of the Babylon War is Peace Ponzi Swamp economy; [B] require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; [C] nationalize all property and provide all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) with cultural law self rule for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration land reform to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

* EoP UN Resolution: incl definitions & summaries [PDF]
» EoP UN Resolution [PDF]; Amendment to Crime of Aggression Definition of Rome Statute of Intnl Criminal Court [PDF].
» Definitions / Summaries: Crime of Aggression [PDF]; Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands [PDF]; Ego Literacy [PDF]; EoP Denuclearization [PDF]; EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [PDF]; EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [PDF]; EoP Footprint [PDF]; Land Reform [PDF]; One Child Law [PDF]; Prisoner Pardon [PDF]; Property Ration [PDF]; Responsible Freedom Oath [PDF]; Shut Down Swamp Economy [PDF].
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Sep: LJ v SGMC Court Filing 16 May: LJ v LS Court Filing.

Applicant notified Speaker: WCPP: Masizole Mnqasela [14 Dec: H 225/19: LJ v SGMC: S-WCPP EoP UN Res Decl Vote deadline: 10 Feb 2020] that she would contact activist individuals and organizations to inform them of Speaker: WCPP intentions and request their EoP UN Resolution [PDF: pp.13-54/56] Declaration [PDF: pp.55/56] mandate support to implement EoP SciCult law [PDF: pp.19-22/56] as international law.

EoP UN Resolution Declarations [eop-axis-oath] will be used to provide LJ v LS [lj-v-ls] Heads of State/Org – Cyril Ramaphosa, Bill Gates, Ueli Maurer, Ursula von der Leyen, Antonio Guterrez, Stuart Peach, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin – a mandate to authorize EoP UN Resolution to be submitted to UN General Assembly, to implement EoP SciCult law as binding international law.

Questions prior to providing EoP UN Resolution Declaration Mandate Support:

If you wish to submit questions or objections prior to deciding whether to provide your individual and/or organizational EoP UN Resolution Declaration [PDF: pp.55/56] support or not.

Please submit questions or objections to Applicant: Email: eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za.

If objections are sincere peacenik / honourable warrior village idiot common sense objective reality [PDF: eop-rh-fr] scientifically based, if your village idiot common sense evidence is scientifically superior to EoP village idiot common sense evidence; the appropriate EoP village idiot common sense facts in EoP UN Resolution will be amended by Applicant; in accordance with the superior village idiot common sense evidence.

All questions and objections will be answered in accordance to EoP ego literacy [PDF: pp.34-35/56] communication policy, published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub] correspondence, and may be submitted into the court record.

Deadline for EoP UN Resolution Declarations is 10 Feb 2020. EoP TRC or No EoP TRC vote deadline dates are noted at lj-v-ls.

EoP – Exit Economic Apartheid Babylon Ecocide Law – UN Resolution:

EoP UN Resolution is the updated version of the Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation submission submitted to Archbishop Desmond Tutu and South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

In 1999 I filed a Submission to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (“TRC”), promising to donate my inheritance to the TRC; in support of sincere – racial, religious, class and gender – land and economic inequality reform reconciliation in South Africa.
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 May: CH 45/19: LJ v CRLRC Court Filing [PDF].

EoP UN Resolution is the updated version of the Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation submission submitted to President George W Bush re: US v Timothy McVeigh.

[34] In May 2001, I wrote a letter to President Bush requesting President Bush to suspend Timothy McVeigh’s execution pending OKC bombing Truth and Reconciliation, to facilitate honest forgiveness and truth-seeking problem solving related to the US domestic and foreign policy causes of the OKC bombing. If the OKC TRC proceedings did not grant Timothy McVeigh amnesty, they would choose to sentence Timothy McVeigh and myself to death.
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 May: LJ v LS Court Filing: LJ Affidavit [PDF]

A similar – Braveheart Shibumi Satori Honour Trial Lawfare [braveheart-ss] – offer was made to (a) US, Afghanistan and Taliban officials in October 2001 on behalf of providing Osama bin Laden a free and fair trial after I became aware of the Taliban’s offer to extradite Osama bin Laden to the International Criminal Court at the Hague, for his alleged involvement in the World Trade Center Attacks; on the condition he was granted a free and fair trial by a jury of his peers; (b) to Norwegian officials and Anders Breivik in 2011 after I became aware that Breivik’s lawyer was endorsing efforts to deny his client a necessity defence in favour of a mental insanity defence. Anders Breivik’s Thank you letter [PDF].

The EoP UN Resolution is also the updated version of the Ecology of Peace Amicus submitted to the South African Constitutional Court in CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride.

[12] The Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End Abel and Kane Cold War Pro Se Amicus submitted – with consent from SA Concourt Justices [PDF] – to the South African Constitutional Court in CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm] argued that South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was negligent and/or a fraud, denying both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict.
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Sep: Court Filing: LJ v Speaker: George Council & Four Others.

EoP/OKC TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529

Sent per electronic notice to:

Sussex Royals: Harry & Megan Windsor:
Sussex Royals: Counsel: Schillings: Keith Schilling (keith.schilling@schillingspartners.com); Christopher Mills (christopher.mills@schillingspartners.com); Rod Christie-Miller (rod.christie-miller@schillingspartners.com);

DCAF: Daniel Warner:
DCAF: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (info@dcaf.ch); Intnl Security Sector Advisory (contact@issat.dcaf.ch);

Royal Family:
Counsel: Harbottle & Lewis (info@harbottle.com); Catherine Bedford (catherine.bedford@harbottle.com); Robert Porter (Robert.porter@harbottle.com); Daniel Tozer (Daniel.Tozer@harbottle.com); Lawrence Abramson (lawrence.abramson@harbottle.com); Gary Ashford (gary.ashford@harbottle.com);

Prince Charles:
Prince Charles: Counsel: Payne Hicks Beach (enquiries@phb.co.uk); Fiona Schackleton (fshackleton@phb.co.uk)

Sussex Royals & Royal Family African Charities:
The Justice Desk (info@justicedesk.org); Halo Trust: Louise Vaughan (louise.vaughan@halotrust.org); Queens Commonwealth Trust (info@qct.org.uk); Press (press@qct.org.uk); ; Sentebale (info@sentebale.org); African Parks (info@africanparks.org); YES: Youth Empowerment Service (corporatesupport@yes4youth.co.za)

Tom McTague, BAJ & NUJ Royal Correspondents:
The Atlantic: Tom McTague (tmctague@theatlantic.com); Royal Correspondents via British Association of Journalists: Matthew Myatt (office@bajunion.org.uk); National Union of Journalists (info@nuj.org.uk); Michelle Stanistreet: Comms (communications@nuj.org.uk); Midlands (nujmanchester@nuj.org.uk); Scotland (nujscotland@nuj.org.uk): Ireland (info@nuj.ie); Ofcom Contact Center (ofcomcontactcentre@ofcom.org.uk); Jonathan Oxley (jonathan.oxley@ofcom.org.uk); Media (mediaoffice@ofcom.org.uk); Sophie Richings (Sophie.Richings@ofcom.org.uk); Polly Weitzman (polly.weitzman@ofcom.org.uk); Peter Susman QC (psusman@hendersonchambers.co.uk);

Fridays for Future: Greta Thunberg:
Greta Thunberg (GretaThunbergMedia@gmail.com); School Strike: Janine OKeefe (info@fores.se); European Climate Foundation: Daniel Donner (daniel.donner@europeanclimate.org); Fridays for Future: International (international.media@fridaysforfuture.org); Media (swe.media@fridaysforfuture.org);

UK Supreme Court: Registrar: Louise di Mambro:
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom: Registry (registry@supremecourt.uk); Angela Chandler (angela.chandler@supremecourt.uk); Registrar: Louise di Mambro (louise.dimambro@supremecourt.uk); UK Supreme Court Chief Justice Lady Hale via UK Supreme Court (enquiries@supremecourt.uk); Janet Coull Trisic (Janet.Coull-Trisic@supremecourt.uk); Rebecca Lowson (rebecca.lowson@supremecourt.uk)

Ursula von der Leyen, Charles Michel, Michel Barnier, David Sassoli:
EU Commission: President Ursula von der Leyen (ec-president-vdl@ec.europa.eu); Bjoern Seibert (Bjoern.SEIBERT@ec.europa.eu); Marilena Zammit (Marilena.ZAMMIT@ec.europa.eu); Alisa James (Alisa.JAMES@ec.europa.eu); Sec Gen: Klaus Welle (klaus.welle@ep.europa.eu); Franck Debie (franckrene.debie@ep.europa.eu); EU Parl Spokesman & Dir Gen Jaume Duch Guillot (jaume.duch@ep.europa.eu); European Council: Charles Michel: Carla Valtorta (carla.valtorta@consilium.europa.eu); Press Office (press.office@consilium.europa.eu); Article 50 Task Force (TF50-contact@ec.europa.eu); Michel Barnier (Michel.Barnier@ec.europa.eu); European Parliament: David Sassoli  (president@ep.europa.eu); Marcus Cornaro: Ambassador: EU Delegation in SA (Delegation-S-Africa@eeas.europa.eu)

.

4 Comments

    1. […] Below is a transparency copy of LJvLS-EU Q Re: Megxit definition of objective reality progressive definition correspondence to Duke and Duchesss of Essex and Democratic Control of Armed Forces: Asst Dir: Daniel Warner [11 Jan: LJvLS-EU Q Re: DCAF/Megxit definition of objective reality progressive] […]

    1. […] Daniel Warner: Is it necessary to be a Greta to get a message across? This is the crux of the matter. For if we turn to those who were successful in getting messages across, the simplicity of the message is clear. And, Greta’s simple message about the environment reflects the simplicity of her personality. Greta and her message are not rocket science. … Where is the progressive message and who is the messenger today? These are simple questions, not to be answered by fancy PR communication strategies or rebranding. – Counterpunch: Where’s the Progressive Message? Whose the Messenger?. » EoP Leg Sub: 11 Jan: LJvLS-EU Q Re: DCAF/Megxit definition of objective reality progressive. […]

Leave a Comment