22 Jan: McVeigh2020: NFerguson: Climate Pollution; DStanhope Incentive based Eugenics

* Niall Ferguson, Doug Stanhope, Ted Nugent, Adam Kokesh, Vermin Supreme.
* 22 Jan: McVeigh2020: NFerguson: Climate Pollution; DStanhope Incentive based Eugenics.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: McVeigh2020, EoP v Alt Right, EoP v US Peace Rep / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: McVeigh 2020 Exp Comm <mcveigh2020@tygae.org.za>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 22:13:59 +0200
Subject: Re: NFerguson: China Climate Pollution; DStanhope Incentive based Eugenics.
To: “Niall Ferguson: Clinton Parker” <cbparker@stanford.edu>, Doug Stanhope <doug@dougstanhope.com>, Stanhope Podcast <stanhopepodcast@gmail.com>
Cc: “Ted Nugent: Paul Wilson” <paul@TedNugent.com>, Adam Kokesh <adam.kokesh@gmail.com>, Vermin Supreme <socialssupreme@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1dda819388fbe9f45ec672d51c20b8a2@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: mcveigh2020@tygae.org.za


TO: Niall Ferguson, Doug Stanhope
CC: Ted Nugent, Adam Kokesh, Vermin Supreme

Niall Ferguson & Doug Stanhope:

Re: NFerguson: China Climate Pollution; DStanhope Incentive based Eugenics.

Simply put, Ferguson dares to say that all the virtue-signaling is not in any way candid, because if it were, they would admit that “60% of CO2 emissions since Greta Thunberg was born is attributable to China… but nobody talks about that. They talk as if its somehow Europeans and Americans who are going to fix this problem… which is frustrating because it doesn’t get to the heart of the matter.” Ferguson comfortably admits that there is a climate change problem, but that’s not the point. The point is what are we going to do about it, to which he asks rhetorically… “If you’re serious about slowing CO2 emissions and temperatures rising it has to be China and India that are constrained.” But Greta goes to New York or Davos: “I don’t see her in Beijing or Delhi.” – Zero Hedge: I don’t See Her in Beijing or Delhi – Niall Ferguson Slams Davos Virtue Signalling Greta Thunberg.

However, it’s fitting that for a former US presidential candidate (for the Libertarian Party) one discernible theme in his show is leadership. His message is that people can be led politically (sexually and romantically, too), but that leaders cannot, in themselves, lead. “If you need a leader, hire a dominatrix,” he splutters. ……. “If you’ve made eugenics incentive based for people willing to sterilize themselves, offer some white trash prizes. Nascar pit pass, meet your favourite driver – all you gotta do is snip the sack. Year supply of Sunny Delight! You want some Sunny D don’t ya? All you gotta do is putty up that hole, lady. You still have two holes left to trick guys out to drinks at the bar.” Are you telling me if I cut off my balls, I’m going crossbow hunting with Ted Nugent? – Independent: Doug Stanhope, Leicester Square Theatre, London; Doug Stanhope: I’m Doug Stanhope and that’s why I drink; Incentive Based Eugenics; Overpopulating Consumers.

Are you running for President? Yes Sir. My name is Adam Kokesh and I’m running for Not-President of the United States in 2020, on the platform of an orderly dissolution of the United States Federal Goverment. ……..  Vermin Supreme. Let me make a prediction Adam. America’s stock some will argue is slowly on the decline. My own stock as is evidenced is slowly rising. I predict that the two will cross in 2036. That is when I will be in the White House. Until then I am just placeholding, I am biding my time. Adam Kokesh: Not if I have something to say about it, then the White House will just be a museum by then. America doesn’t need a president, but if we are going to have one, we couldn’t do worse than Vermin Supreme. If elected, I will faithfully execute all Americans. – Adam Kokesh: Adam Kokesh vs Vermin Supreme 2020; Super Mega Vortex: Vermin Supreme for Kansas Attorney General; Story-Crafters: Vermin Supreme Concedes Donald Trump Crazier; Liberty Outlet: Adam Kokesh For President 2020.
» EoP Leg Sub: 06 Jan: EoP Veto Swamp Elections TRC Negotiations Info for 2020 US Presidential Candidates; 03 Mar: EoP Re: Pickering: Trump has brought US credibility to level of carjacker.

Timothy McVeigh: If elected, I will faithfully authorize the humane and orderly assisted suicide execution of all Babylonians. Babylonian definition: legal US citizen, or illegal US resident convicted of intentional – procreation, consumption and/or deception – crimes of aggression [PDF: crimes-of-aggression]. – McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020].

Population Factor CO2 emissions:

Al Bartlett: Now China come to the global warming conferences and say ‘look China’s contribution to the reduction of global warming because of these 300 million avoided births; thats more than any of the other countries have done.’ And its a little hard to argue with that. – ASPO: Al Bartlett on China’s One Child Population Policy.

Paul Murtaugh: Every child increases a parents carbon footprint by a factor of 20.
Dr. Paul Murtaugh: Reproduction and Carbon legacies of individuals. The Conversation: How Family Planning could be part of answer to climate change. The Guardian: Baby emissions fuel global warming.

Deng Xiaoping introduced China’s one child policy in 1978-79, to halt – an average of 6 children per family – population growth. On 25 Sep 1980 an official public letter called on all citizens to adhere to the one child policy. The One Child policy was enacted and managed by the National Population and Family Planning Commission, through incentives, persuasion and coercion. Unofficial figures claim approximately 300-400 million births were prevented between 1978-2015. A 2008 survey reported that 76% of the Chinese public support the law. Less than 10% of Chinese families have taken advantage of the Chinese governments relaxation of the law to a two child policy; citing environmental and economic reasons for their adherence to the one child policy rule. Each child increases a parent’s carbon footprint by a factor of 20. – Mojo: 10 China’s One-Child Policy Facts; Suzanne Transki: One Child Policy Documentary; ASPO: Al Bartlett on China’s One Child Population Policy.

Almost all carbon footprint calculators and all references to carbon footprints by mainstream media and environmentalists – consciously or unconsciously: if consciously: presumably for PC Army afraid to offend the overbreeders and the overbreeding overconsumers [Doug Stanhope: Overpopulating Consumers; Incentive Based Eugenics] reasons – refer only to measuring consumption, not procreation. A holistic scientific based eco-carrying capacity and/or carbon footprint measurement must include both consumption and procreation factor.

To holistically measure a carbon footprint, multiply the individuals consumption footprint with their procreation factor: one child [20]; 2 children [40]; 3 children [60].

Ecology of Peace UN Resolution IPAT carbon footprint measurement definition.

[2.2] Carrying Capacity Sustainability: I=PAT Equation:
[A]  For activities to be genuinely sustainable it must be possible for them to continue indefinitely. The impact of humanity on the environment and the demands that people place on the resources available on the planet can be summarised by what is known as the Ehrlich or IPAT equation, I=PAT. I = impact on the environment or demand for resources, P = population size, A = affluence and T = technology. The two most important conclusions deriving from this IPAT footprint  relationship are that: (i) the Earth can support only a limited number of people, at a certain level of affluence, in a sustainable manner; and (ii) Population and Consumption must be reduced to below EoP Footprint carrying capacity.

[2.5] [A] An individuals IPAT footprint is a result of: (A) Consumption Footprint multiplied by (B) Procreation Factor (Every child increases footprint by factor of 20).
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 May: Court Filing: LJ v LS: EoP UN Res. [PDF pp.25-66/70] EoP Footprint [PDF].

Examples of EoP culture carbon footprint measurements [eco-ego-footprints].

If you are sincere about global EoP libertarian one child law incentive based eugenics:

McVeigh2020 [mcveigh2020] will authorize EoP UN Resolution [ljvls: PDF pp.25-66/70: eop-un-res] to implement EoP SciCult law [PDF: eop-scicultlaw] as international law.

[1]  Scientific Law:
[1.1] Scientific Law refers to Procreation and Consumption below carrying capacity limits. EoP Footprint [PDF: eop-footprint] defines how procreation and consumption carrying capacity limit is measured.

[2]  Cultural Law:
[2.1] Cultural law [PDF: cult-law-self-rule] refers to any racial, religious, gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any EoP scientific laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals. Ego literacy [PDF: ego-eco-literacy] clarifies how to engage in and/or measure a fully informed consenting agreement.

[3]  Individuals Rights and Duties under Scientific & Cultural Law:
[3.1] Property Ration [PDF: property-ration] – guaranteed for life – for all individuals who have signed and abide by their responsible freedom [PDF: responsible-freedom] oaths.

[4]  Crimes of Aggression Violations of Scientific & Cultural Law:
[4.1] Violations of (a) Scientific Law are Procreation or Consumption Crimes of Aggression [PDF: crimes-of-aggression]; (b) Cultural Law are Deception Crimes of Aggression [PDF: crimes-of-aggression].


Former Judge Jason Brent: A Global One Child Law Proposal: How to Determine Who Can and Who Cannot Reproduce:
The action I am initially proposing is value neutral and does not favor or harm any individual or group. The action I am proposing will be applied to every person or group without favoring anyone. The action is very simple—limit the right of any male to father only one live child and limit the right of every woman to one live birth. In simple terms a couple is limited to one and only one child—not one child for the male and one child for the female. Since survival of our species depends on the one child rule, under my proposal any attempt to evade the rule would result in death of the evader and of any second child. The rule to be fair must be absolute, without a single exception. If the female cannot or refuses to provide the name of the father she and the child shall be immediately executed. All of the ideas set forth in this paragraph may be considered horrible and inhumane. However, since they will be applied equally, no individual or group is harmed except to the extent that an individual cannot either father or give birth to a second child. The harm caused to the individual and the harm caused to all of humanity by enforcing the one child rule set forth above is miniscule compared to the harm which all of humanity would suffer if population were not reduced. – Jason Brent: A Global One Child Law Proposal: How to Determine Who Can and Who Cannot Reproduce;
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Jan: EoP TRC Info: Pakistan Chief Justice Nisar’s populaton control task force; 18 Sep: LJ v SGMC Court Filing 16 May: LJ v LS Court Filing: EoP UN Resolution [PDF] One Child Law [PDF].

If you’re serious about slowing CO2 emissions:

“If you can’t measure something, you can’t improve things because you have no basis of evaluation.” – Christine Le Garde; Global Financial Meltdown.

The only difference between 0.1% economic growth Climate Change Ecocide Titanic and 5% economic growth Ecocide Titanic is the speed at which they are heading towards the Ecocide Iceberg. The ultimate outcome – ecocide destruction of the planet – of 0.1% growth, 1% growth or 10% growth consumption of any resource in a finite resource environment is the same. The only difference is the one takes longer than the other to reach the ultimate destination. [Crash Course: Exponential Growth & Power of Compounding; World Population Balance: Understanding Exponential Growth; Growth Busters: Limits to Growth: Bacteria in a Bottle. Bartlett: Arithmetic, Population and Energy: SQ Copy]. If you sincerely want to stop and reverse the Climate Ecocide Titanic; you have to find the intellectual cohones to confront the question: What is a sustainable procreation and consumption footprint?  Not what do my fragile ego feelings want to be a sustainable procreation and consumption footprint; but what – scientifically as in natures law – is a sustainable procreation and consumption footprint. Natures laws do not give a fuck about any race or class or religions fragile ego feelings. You have to be able to articulate the answer to that question in KISS – Keep it Simple Stupid – language that everyone can understand – so that fake environmentalists cannot deceive potentially sincere and alarmed layperson citizens [Astrid Dannenberg: Climate Change Negotiations: Unconditional Cooperators and FreeRider Parasites]. The suggested Stop the Ecocide Titanic solution action should not affect one group of people, based on their race, religion, ideology, class or gender, any different than any other group of people. If it does, you will have massive internal conflict juridical problems implementing your Stop the Ecocide Titanic solution.
» EoP Leg Sub: 06 Feb: EoP Re: The Theranos NGO Green New Deal MIC behind Greta Thunbergs School Strike; 17 Dec: EoP Re: MH Army of Greta’s; DW: Climate Refugees in Bangladesh.

If you are serious about EoP 0°C climate solution plan:

Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) was not invited to Sec Gen Guterres 21-23 Sep 2019 UN 1.5°C above pre-industrial civilization Climate Summit [unclimatesummit.org; un.org/un-climate-summit-2019]; presumably because Ecology of Peace plan is an EoP 0°C above pre-industrial civilization plan. No offence taken.

Ecology of Peace UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70; lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.13-54/56; mcveigh2020: PDF] is an EoP 0°C plan. More specifically: Ecology of Peace culture working hypothesis is that climate change is a symptom of greenhouse gas energy emissions resulting from international law enabling human procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits. Consequently EoP – Return to Steppe Aryan 0° Eden – UN Resolution plan is a Return to Steppe Aryan Eden low tech agrarian pre-industrial society plan; to (a) implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law based on EoP Footprint as international law. EoP SciCult law is a natural carbon sink sequestration degrowth law; that will require and enable (i) orderly and humane negative – human procreation / consumption exponential degrowth – energy emissions, and (ii) reforestation, soil regeneration etc natural carbon sink sequestration of carbon from the atmosphere to (iii) collectively stop and exponentially degrowth reverse procreation and consumption energy emissions and their feedback loops leading to climate change collapse.
» EoP Leg Sub: 21 Sep: Access to Env Info Req to UN 1.5°C Climate Summit ITO Aarhus Convention.

If you are sincere [eop-axis-oath] about cooperating to implement EoP 0°C climate solution / global one child law plan:

Ecology of Peace Objective Truth aka United Science for 0°C Fair Game Village Idiots:

Ecology of Peace Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Transforming the World Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors:
Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] and EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] are EoP culture’s functional group shared system of thought and action frame of orientation and object of inter-species relating devotion interpretation of reality for individuals whose object of devotion/values include: (i) honest – race, religious, gender and cultural – relationships; (ii) an ecological carrying capacity based perspective of observable factual social contract reality; and (iii) non-violent cooperative root cause problem solving.
* Objective Factual Reality: [1] Earth is not flat. [2] Resources are finite. [3] When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict. [4] Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: climate change, mass migration, poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc. [5] The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.
* Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior: Interpretative Reality: [6] If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate [eop-cooperator.tygae.org.za] to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw] clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.
» EoP Leg Sub: 24 Sep: EoP Req for – United Science – Info to SY Team Malizia.

* EoP UN Resolution: including definitions & summaries [PDF]
* EoP UN Resolution [PDF]; Amendment to Crime of Aggression Definition of Rome Statute of Intnl Criminal Court [PDF].
» Definitions / Summaries: Crime of Aggression [PDF]; Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands [PDF]; Ego Literacy [PDF]; EoP Denuclearization [PDF]; EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [PDF]; EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [PDF]; EoP Footprint [PDF]; Land Reform [PDF]; One Child Law [PDF]; Prisoner Pardon [PDF]; Property Ration [PDF]; Responsible Freedom Oath [PDF]; Shut Down Swamp Economy [PDF].
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Sep: LJ v SGMC Court Filing 16 May: LJ v LS Court Filing.

EoP/OKC TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]


Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529

Sent per electronic notice to:

Niall Ferguson, Doug Stanhope, Ted Nugent, Adam Kokesh, Vermin Supreme:
Niall Ferguson: Clinton Parker (cbparker@stanford.edu); Contact Form; Doug Stanhope (doug@dougstanhope.com); Stanhope Podcast (stanhopepodcast@gmail.com); Ted Nugent: Paul Wilson (paul@TedNugent.com); Adam Kokesh (adam.kokesh@gmail.com); Vermin Supreme (socialssupreme@gmail.com)


Sent via Contact Form:

Sent: 22 Jan 2020: 22:30 hrs: Niall Ferguson Contact Form.

EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War negotiations correspondence – on behalf of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants.tygae.org.za] – to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] as international law; sent TO: Niall Ferguson, Doug Stanhope; CC: Ted Nugent, Adam Kokesh, Vermin Supreme; is published at EoP Leg Sub: 22 Jan: McVeigh2020: NFerguson: China Climate Pollution; DStanhope Incentive based Eugenics.