14 Feb: EoP Re: John Kelly: Kim Jongun is fake peacenik; Trump Zelensky order illegal

* John Kelly, Worldwide Speakers Group, The Atlantic, Peter Nicholas, Current Affairs, Nathan J Robinson, Burn the Boats, Ken Harbaugh, Stan McChrystal, Israel Policy Forum, Commanders for Israel’s Security, North Korea Supreme Leader, Kim Jong-un, North Korea Embassy, Choe Hyok Chol, Kim Chol Nam, Kwang Sop Kim, Kim Pyong II, Kim Young Jae, Han Tae Song, Pyong II Kim
* 14 Feb: EoP Re: John Kelly: Kim Jongun is fake peacenik; Trump Zelensky order illegal.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v Cmdrs Israel Security, EoP v Kim Jongun / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA: EoP NTE GMKR | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:49:19 +0200
Subject: EoP Re: John Kelly: Kim Jongun is fake peacenik; Trump Zelensky order illegal
To: John Kelly via Worldwide Speakers Group <speakers@wwsg.com>, “The Atlantic: Peter Nicholas” <pnicholas@theatlantic.com>, Current Affairs <editor@currentaffairs.org>, Nathan J Robinson <nrobinson@g.harvard.edu>, “Burn the Boats: Ken Harbaugh” <burntheboats@evergreenpodcasts.com>
Cc: Stan McChrystal <stan@mcchrystalgroup.com>, Israel Policy Forum <info@israelpolicyforum.org>, Commanders for Israel’s Security <mail@cis.org.il>, “North Korea Supreme Leader: Kim Jong-un via North Korea Embassy in Auckland” <koreanconsulate@xtra.co.nz>, “North Korea Embassy: Algiers: Amb Choe Hyok Chol” <agkoem@gmail.com>, “Singapore: Amb Kim Chol Nam” <embdprk@singnet.com.sg>, “Mexico: MX City” <dprkoreaemb@prodigy.net.mx>, “AT Vienna: Amb Kwang Sop Kim” <d.v.r.korea.botschaft@chello.at>, “PL Warsaw: Amb Kim Pyong II” <korembpl@yahoo.com>, “RU Moscow: Amb Kim Young Jae” <korea.emb.mos@gmail.com>, “CH Bern: Amb Han Tae Song” <dprk.embassy@bluewin.ch>, “CZ Rep: Prague: Amb Pyong II Kim” <vel.kldr@seznam.cz>
Message-ID: <90debc92426c65d454fa49c6cad513b2@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za

TO: John Kelly, Peter Nichola, Nathan Robinson, Ken Harbaugh
CC: Stan McChrystal, Cmdrs Israel Security, Kim Jongun:

John Kelley et al:

EoP Re: John Kelly: Kim Jongun is fake peacenik; Trump Zelensky order illegal.

When Vindman heard the president tell Zelensky he wanted to see the Biden family investigated, that was tantamount to hearing “an illegal order,” Kelly said. “We teach them, ‘Don’t follow an illegal order. And if you’re ever given one, you’ll raise it to whoever gives it to you that this is an illegal order, and then tell your boss.’”  Throughout the appearance, Kelly laid out his doubts about Trump’s policies. Trump has held two formal summits with North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong Un, hoping to scuttle the country’s nuclear program through personal diplomacy. Kelly said the effort was futile. “He will never give his nuclear weapons up,” Kelly said. “Again, President Trump tried—that’s one way to put it. But it didn’t work. I’m an optimist most of the time, but I’m also a realist, and I never did think Kim would do anything other than play us for a while, and he did that fairly effectively.” ……….. In October, Kelly admitted that he had “second thoughts” about leaving the White House. “It pains me to see what’s going on because I believe if I was still there or someone like me was there, he would not be, kind of, all over the place,” he said. Donald Trump: When I terminated John Kelly, which I couldn’t do fast enough, he knew full well that he was way over his head. Being Chief of Staff just wasn’t for him. He came in with a bang, went out with a whimper, but like so many X’s, he misses the action & just can’t keep his mouth shut. – The Atlantic: John Kelly Finally Lets Loose on Trump; via CNN: The Atlantic: John Kelly defends Vindman after firing; Breitbart: Donald Trump: John Kelly ‘Misses the Action and Just Can’t Keep His Mouth Shut’.

Fire Down Below: Hi, I’m Steven. Steven Seagull: I don’t believe in your authority. ………. Crimson Tide: We can play these games all night, Mr. Hunter; but I don’t have the luxury of your presumptions. Sir .. Mr Hunter, we have rules that are not open to interpretation.. personal intuition, gut feelings, hairs on the back of your neck… little devils or angels sitting on your shoulders. Captain … We’re all very well aware of what our orders are and what those orders mean. They come down from our Commander in Chief. They contain no ambiguity. Captain, Sir…. Mr Hunter, I’ve made the decision. I’m captain of this boat. Now shut the fuck up! – Fire Down Below: Trailer: I don’t believe in your authority; Crimson Tide: Trailer: Who is the Enemy.

Daniel Ellsberg: My work at Harvard was on decision-making under uncertainty. At the Rand Corporation I had been studying the highest stakes hypothetical gamble in human history: whether or not to launch nuclear missiles on the basis of an ambiguous warning. T Schelling: He was focused on the question: If you had to go to war, how to do it in the least dangerous way. Who would make the decisions, how would the decisions get communicated, and what were the options available to the President. …. LBJ: We still seek no wider war. Daniel Ellsberg: No wider war. As I found out day by day in the Pentagon, that was our highest priority, preparing a wider war, which we expected to take place immediately after the election.  LBJ: Its a war that I think ought to be fought by the boys of Asia to protect their own land.  And for that reason I haven’t chosen to enlarge the war. Daniel Ellsberg: That was a conscious lie. We all knew that inside the government and not one of us told the press or the public or the electorate during the election. It was a well kept secret by thousands and thousands of people including me. – The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers: Trailer.
» EoP Leg Sub: 05 Feb: HR 1249: TN IA2020: EoP Int: Kremlin – Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Defn – Offer.

Aaron David Miller: You do not have an Israeli or Palestinian leader right now, or an American president frankly, who is prepared to pay the price of what it would take to lay the basis for a conflict ending agreement of the Israeli Palestinian conflict. ………. Gatekeepers: The motto of the film the Gatekeepers is strategy vs tactics. ….. Sun Tzu: If the strategic and/or tactical orders of the military, political or legal general are unclear and the troops do not obey, it is the fault of the general that the troops do not obey. If the strategic and/or tactical orders of the military, political or legal general are clear and the troops do not obey, it is the fault of the subordinate officers and troops for refusing to obey. – Frontline: Netanyahu at War; ABC RN Breakfast: The Gatekeepers: Israel’s spy leaders call for peace; Israel Policy Forum CIS Commanders: Mossad: Shabtai Shavit; IDF Central Command: Avi Mizrahi; History Channel: Sun Tzu – The Art of War.

EoP MILED Clerk – on behalf of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants] – Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End the Abel and Kane Cold War strategic and tactical – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior [eop-rh-fr] – recommendations to Commanders in Chief of NATO, Red Army and People’s Liberation Army [lj-v-ls] is to form an EoP Axis [eop-axis] alliance to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law, via EoP UN Resolution [PDF pp.25-66/70: eop-un-res]; to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation by  (a) requiring all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizing all property and providing all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) cultural law self rule homelands for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future. With regard to military/national/public service: The implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law would allow for orderly and humane abolition of tax funded standing armies and political representatives to be replaced by responsible freedom citizen militia and political representatives. Sincere peacenik / honourable warrior citizens can sign their unconditional or conditional cooperator EoP Axis Oaths [eop-axis-oath] to provide their Heads of State with an EoP Axis Alliance: EoP UN Resolution mandate.
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Nov: EoP Re: National Comm on Military, National and Public Service Enquiry; 02 Dec: EoP – Bathtub Gov – UN Resolution TN to Dick Cheney & Grover Norquist.

FYI: Kremlin Consent to EoP UN Resolution Denuke Definition Offer:

FSB Director General Alexander Bortnikov’s EoP Truth and Reconciliation to End Abel and Kane Cold War [Clarkson or ExactlyTN: Endgame: Journey] negotiations preliminary offer on behalf of President Vladimir Putin and Russian Supreme Court: Chief Justice: Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Lebedev; to President Donald Trump, US Senate and Congress; via SCOTUS: Chief Justice: John Roberts: FSB Message: If Donald Trump and Jared Kushner sincerely want an End Abel and Kane Cold War Peace Deal of Century: FSB / GRU / Kremlin preliminary offer: Consent to EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] Denuclearization Definition [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.38/70].
» EoP Leg Sub: 02 Feb: EoP Int: Kremlin Consent to EoP UN Resolution Denuke Definition Offer; 07 Feb: Notice to IA Sec of State: Re: RU Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Definition Offer.

Transparency Notification of EoP Int: Kremlin Consent to EoP UN Resolution Denuke Definition Offer – which occurred on the 30th anniversary of Apartheid SA President FW de Klerk’s 02 Feb 1990 End of Apartheid speech to Parliament; which resulted in Post-Apartheid South Africa shutting down its Nuclear Weapons program.
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 Feb: Notice to IA Sec of State: Re: RU Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Definition Offer; 02 Feb: TN: LJvFWdK/SGMC: EoP Int: Kremlin – Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Defn – Offer.

[12] The Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End Abel and Kane Cold War Pro Se Amicus submitted – with consent from SA Concourt Justices [PDF] – to the South African Constitutional Court in CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm] argued that South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was negligent and/or a fraud, denying both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict.
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Sep: Court Filing: LJ v Speaker: George Council & Four Others; 09 Nov: EoP Re: eNCA: Springbok support questioned..

Re: Ken Harbaugh, et al: What is a Legal and Illegal Order?:

Stan McChrystal: What you can do [to create a shared strategic consciousness culture] is tell people how to think about things and the broader mission. There’s a great line we used to use in Afghanistan: “If, when you get on the ground, the order that we gave you is wrong, execute the order that we should have given you.” Think about the responsibility you’re giving your subordinates when you issue that instruction. You’re looking for them to use their best judgment. – Forbes: Combat Consultant: Q&A with Retired General Stanley McChrystal [SQ Copy].
» EoP Leg Sub: 21 Nov: EoP: Re: Combat Consultant: Q&A With Retired General Stanley McChrystal.

Ken Harbaugh: I spent nine years on active duty in the U.S. Navy. I served as an aircraft commander, led combat reconnaissance crews, and taught naval history. But the first thing I did upon joining the military, the act that solemnized my obligation, was swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution. How strange, then, that despite all of my training, the millions of taxpayer dollars devoted to teaching me how to fly, lead, and teach, not once did I receive meaningful instruction on the document to which I had pledged my life. For most of my time in uniform, my lack of understanding about the Constitution was entirely academic. No one I served with imagined that we would ever find ourselves choosing between following orders and upholding our oath. Some were dimly aware that our compatriots long ago had wrestled with these issues. As an instructor at the Citadel, I taught my students about the My Lai massacre, and about the obligation to disobey an unlawful order. But it was theoretical. To my students, Vietnam was a faint echo. Years ago, as a young Navy pilot, I learned to escape a sinking helicopter at night, to land a plane with its engines on fire, and to lead aircrews into harm’s way. All of this, to uphold an oath. Today, the Constitution is under assault from within. The least this country can do to prepare those charged with its defense is to help them understand what they have pledged their lives, and their honor, to uphold. – The Atlantic: The US Military is Not Ready for a Constitutional Crisis.

What will happen, then, on the inevitable day that Trump’s administration refuses to honor a judicial decision? That scenario beggars belief, too. Courts enforce contempt through the U.S. Marshals Service, a team of federal police officers that is ultimately within the president’s chain of command. Will U.S. Marshals side with the judge over the president or vice versa? And if they get that choice wrong, what branch of government stands ready to hold them accountable to the people? – Politico: A Conservative Judge Draws a Line in the Sand With Trump Administration.

Nathan Robinson: To run against Trump, you need to be fully prepared for the fact that he can take any position on any issue at any time. He’s been for abortion and against it, pro-war and anti-war, tough on crime and the friend of the unjustly imprisoned. To beat this, you need to have a clear, powerful, and effective message of your own, and you can’t run someone who is themselves open to charges of lies and hypocrisy. What too few people still understand about Donald Trump is that Trump is formidable. He crushed every Republican in the 2016 primary, and took out the extremely powerful Hillary Clinton. The Apprentice was the #1 show for so long because Trump has a talent for entertaining people and drawing attention to himself.  … If you do it right, Trump’s messaging will just end up looking like a mess. People will know what we’re for. What’s he for? But make no mistake: If it serves him politically, Trump will switch from the hard right to the left in half a second. He will promise you everything, he will be for unions and peace and prisoners. The task in this election is to expose the fraud, and we can only do that if we are not engaged in one ourselves. – Current Affairs: Donald Trump Will Run To The Left; via American Renaissance.

EoP Re: Babylon Kufr Law Juridical ‘Legal/Illegal’ Order Decision-making:

Is it possible to argue with Putin? Of course, but only if you [are sincere – aka ego literate [PDF] – and] have ironclad counterarguments. – [EoP Amended] Vesti: Putin: 01.02.

Stan McChrystal: The problem with direct action [anti-terror] raids is … you can kill or capture enemy leaders, set back their organization; but I those kinds of blows were never decisive. The problem is they give you the illusion of activity and the illusion of progress. They make you feel like you are doing something; and in reality terrorism, is a symptom of wider [resource conflict resulting from right to breed/consume above ecological carrying capacity limits international law clauses] problems; and so if you just go after the symptoms, over time; you’ll feel good about it. You can even point to your constituence or point to anybody, look at all we’re doing’; but the problem can actually be getting worse. If you’re just striking & you don’t go after the base problems; … you can find yourself lopsided. You learn you’ve only learnt how to wack, & we say its the wack a mole; & you can continue that indefinately. …….  So what we need to do is think of terrorism as an idea problem. Ideas spring from conditions so its not sexy, its not bearded guys with fancy weapons kicking doors down thats going to end terrorism, its going to be ending some of the things that cause people to be so unhappy. Some of the economic inequity, the lack of opportunities, education. Those are the real drivers to fix it, and you got to do some things in the near term, drop some bombs and various other military activities, but that is never the solution, in my view. The solution is always far upstream and its more expensive, and sometimes it feels more frustrating, but its the only thing that sticks.– [EoP Amended] Foreign Affairs: Military Strategy; Build Series: One Mission: How Leaders Build a Team of Teams.
» IG: 17-04-15_ecologicalovershootiscriminal; 17-08-07_stanmcchrystal-derrickjensen

My follow orders/requests rule of thumb: Does the individual issuing the order – their rank, status, race, religion, class, gender, age is irrelevant – share my EoP SciCult Intnl law strategic goals. If so: Ask questions to make sure that I am 100% accurately interpreting the order/request. Once I understand the tactical order: Do I consider the tactical order to be a reasonable and effective tactic towards accomplishing our strategic goal. If so: it’s a – shared consciousness strategic goal cooperator – lawful order. Do I have the required skills to follow the order. If not: clarify that I lack the required skills, and recommend someone who has the required skills.

The only question is whether EoP SciCult law or WiP Babylon law should be master intnl law; that’s all

Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix Reality doctrine — the Inalienable ‘Right to Breed and Consume, but you need a License to Own a Gun, a License to Drive a Car, a License to Practice Law, a television license, a credit license, a license to earn a living, a university exemption license, a license to fish, a license to hunt, a liquor license, a business license, a marriage license, in some U.S. states, five year olds, even need to get a license to run a lemonade stand on their front lawn — hypocritically referred to as the ‘rule-of-law’ is a legal world of lawyers, politicians and priests, who prefer to negligently ignore, plausibly deny, or socio-psycho-phallicly benefit from the conquer-and-multiply and divide and conquer control over the means of human reproduction and consumption. It is a Matrix reality, of legal, political and religious indulgence salesmen.

It is a legal world, very similar to the Matrix religious world that existed before Martin Luther confronted the religious indulgence salesmen with his Ninety-Five Theses, on the Church of All Saints, on 31 October 1517, thereby initiating the Protestant Reformation.

In the Catholic Church’s religious Matrix world, only Catholic Bishops were entitled to be interpreters of the ‘word of god’. Only they could decide what God meant, about who was guilty and who was innocent, who would go to hell and who would go to heaven. God did not speak to common people, except via the Catholic Church’s bishops.

In Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix world, only those who swear blind obedience to Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix world – lawyers, prosecutors and judges – are deemed to possess the supposed superior intellectual Legal Godlike capabilities, to decipher, decode and interpret the ‘word of civilized patriarch gods’, hence capable of deciding which of us mere Commons surplus cannon fodder mortals acts of commission, or omission, is ‘lawful’ or ‘unlawful’.

Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix ‘AnthroCorpocentric law’ is based upon Flat Earth ‘jurisprudence’, as per the demands of those capable of purchasing Flat Earth legislation indulgences which make their ecologically – breeding/consumption war — criminal acts, to be deemed as ‘legal/lawful’ conduct by the Legal Matrix Bishops: lawyers, prosecutors and Judges.

It is a Matrix world of legal indulgence salesmen; who — ‘Contempt in Facie Curiae’ — demand the public’s sycophantic submissive obedience; for their supposed superior intellectual Godlike capabilities, to decipher, decode and interpret which of us mere Commons surplus cannon and vote fodder mortals acts of commission, or omission, is ‘lawful’ or ‘unlawful’.

Surplus vote fodder citizens may convert to becoming cannon-fodder citizens by joining the military to commit conquering or culling acts of murder and theft, as long as their murder and theft is sanctioned as a lawful conquer, culling or theft order, by one or more groups of left/right conquer-and-multiply legal indulgence salesmen.

In this Matrix Reality legal world, soldiers tasked with the national security conquering and culling responsibilities, of conquering to thieve another tribe’s resources, and culling population ‘useless eaters’ and ‘oxygen thieves’ surplus population excesses; on behalf of the conquering and culling profiteering demands of civilized patriarchy’s civilian corporate and political elite; constantly find themselves confronted with the conquer-or-culling “Befehl ist Befehl” Catch 22 dilemma:

To obey, or not to obey, a ‘Lebensraum’, ‘Difaqane’, ‘Operation Freedumb’ and the thousands like them, order to conquer or cull; since a lawful conquer or culling order, by one group of left/right conquer-and-multiply legal indulgence salesmen, can easily be reinterpreted to be an unlawful order, by another group of opposing left/right conquer-and multiply legal indulgence salesmen; presenting a Catch 22 dilemma from which there is no legal escape.

One who refuses a ‘lawful’ conquering or culling order will still probably be jailed for refusing orders, and one who accepts an ‘unlawful order will be jailed for committing unlawful culling or conquering acts.

Who decides, what is, and what is not, a conquering or culling lawful, or unlawful order?

The ‘Inalienable Right to Breed’ Matrix Reality conquer-and-multiply indulgence salesmen, with their specious justifications, and nightmare of Legal Matrix reality generated bureaucratic stare-decisis cryptic rules and statutes, of course!

“I don’t know what you mean by ‘glory,’” Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. “Of course you don’t—till I tell you. I meant ‘there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!’”
“But ‘glory’ doesn’t mean ‘a nice knock-down argument’,” Alice objected.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”
— Through the Looking Glass, by Lewis Carroll

Anthropocentric Master’s of ‘Relevance’ Jurisprudence:

The question in a Babylon War is Peace civilized patriarchy court is only concerned with who is the master of one word: ‘relevance’.

Any question or answer that exposes civilized patriarchy’s Legal Matrix system for what it is; a system far more corrupt than the Catholic Church’s Indulgences for Sale religious matrix, is simply deemed as ‘irrelevant’.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges defy the laws of ecology with a massive ‘fuck you’, by legislating, interpreting and enforcing Legal Matrix doctrine, that encourages citizens to breed and consume above cultural carrying capacity limits.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges know that legislation which ignores carrying capacity limits results in ecological overshoot, surplus vote-cannon-fodder populations, economic hierarchical inequality, and scarcity induced local, national and international conflict.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges know that legislation which enables ecological overshoot in multi-cultural/ethnic/religious communities, manifests as inter-cultural / ethnic / religious conflict.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges know that inter-cultural / ethnic conflict is a great divide and conquer tool to manipulate the proletariat to perceive other cultural/ethnic proletariat as the source of their own overshoot-scarcity-conflict misery.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges sit in judgement about an accused’s case of theft or murder; while consciously ignoring the theft and thievery and participation in mass murder of the civilized patriarchy corporate elite, who purchased ‘Innocence for Sale’ Indulgences from legislators to avoid legislation that defines their ecologically criminal acts of billion and trillion dollar thievery and murder as ‘unlawful’.

What is relevant?:

It is relevant that civilized patriarchy’s penis constitutions human factory farming rights to breed and consume, is to be master —that’s all.

Who says so?:

Civilized Patriarchy’s ecologically illiterate Legal Matrix Legislator’s, lawyers, judges and prosecutors ego-genitals say so!
» EoP Leg Sub: 25 Jan: USAR Ft Bragg: Culture Change to EoP Honour Ecofootprint Shrinking Lifeboat Ethics?; 27 Nov: LJ Re: Solicitors Regulation Authority: Nicolas Leach: Re: Upd: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons & 11 Others; 30 Jan: EoP v WiP Law Relevance Defns A: Re JManchin: If its relevant I want to hear it.

EoP/OKC TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]


Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529