23 Feb: EoP Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report:.

* JP Morgan, Jamie Dimon, David Mackie, Jessica Murray, Risky Business, Henry Paulson, Paulson Institute, George Soros, Ben Bernanke, Johann Rupert, Richemont, A Lange & Sohne, Baume & Mercier, Center for Education Innovations, Michaelangelo Foundation, Giving Pledge Oligarchs, Bill Ackman, Pershing Square Holdings Ltd, Pershing Square Foundation, Warren Buffet, Berkshire Hathaway, Patrice Motsepe, ARM: African Rainbow Minerals, Ted Turner, US Global Leadership Coalition, Nuclear Threat Initiative, Anne Isenhower Communications LLC, Sierra Grande Lodge & Spa, Ted Turner Expeditions, Vermejo Park Ranch, Merit SI: Austin, Laura Turner Seydel, Pierre Omidyar, Omidyar Network, Michael Milken, Milken Family Foundation, Mo Ibrahim Foundation, Mo Dewji Foundation, Michael Bloomberg, Mackenzie Bezos, Jeff Bezos, Tom Steyer, Need to Impeach, Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook Inc, Cooley LLP, Vladimir Potanin, Interros, Norisk Nickel, Bridge Water Associates, Ray Dalio, Connecticut Attorney General, William Tong, Seeds of Peace, Paul Dalio, Dalio Foundation, Laura and John Arnold Foundation, Center for Open Science, Biran Nosek, John Ioannidis, Steven Goodman, Ben Goldacre, Daniel Gilbert, John D’Agostino, World Capital Markets, Delyana Nordin, EconTalk, Russ Roberts, Leslie Alvarez
* 23 Feb: EoP Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v US Oligarchs, EoP v TGP Oligarchs, EoP v EU Oligarchs, EoP v Johan Rupert, EoP v Ted Turner, EoP v Patrice Motsepe, EoP v African Oligarchs, EoP v RU Oligarchs, EoP v Ray Dalio, EoP US DoJ, LJ v Lindiwe Sisulu  / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA: EoP NTE GMRU | EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: EoP MILED Clerk <eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 18:04:53 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: “JP Morgan: Jamie Dimon” <jamie.dimon@jpmorgan.com>, David Mackie <david.mackie@jpmorgan.com>, Jessica Murray <jessica.x.murray@jpmorgan.com>
Message-ID: <63784212ede9537e53d87c5abafae010@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:35:53 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: Risky Business <feedback@riskybusiness.org>, Media <media@riskybusiness.org>, Henry Paulson via Paulson Institute <info@paulsoninstitute.org>, Deborah Lehr <dlehr@paulsoninstitute.org>, Dorinda Elliott <delliott@paulsoninstitute.org>, Rose Niu  <rniu@paulsoninstitute.org>, Evan Feigenbaum <efeigenbaum@paulsoninstitute.org>
Message-ID: <57c6f03a31adff18852454425ca7591d@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:36:34 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: George Soros <gsoros@sorosny.org>, Ben Bernanke <BBernanke@brookings.edu>, Kriston McIntosh <kmcintosh@brookings.edu>
Message-ID: <f2e27dcb55477d3d8b79f97d60c1ce98@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:37:51 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: “Johann Rupert via Richemont: Comm Director: Sophia Cagnard” <pressoffice@cfrinfo.net>, Sabine Pirone <richemont@teneobluerubicon.com>, A Lange & Sohne <presse@lange-soehne.com>, Baume & Mercier <corinne.delli-gatti@baume-et-mercier.com>, Alfred Dunhill <press@dunhill.com>, Peter Millar <Mgraham@petermillar.com>, “Rupert Foundations: Center for Education Innovations: Donika Dimovska” <ddimovska@r4d.org>, Mark Roland <mroland@r4d.org>, Michaelangelo Foundation <info@michelangelofoundation.org>, Press <press@michelangelofoundation.org>
Message-ID: <d26d1f9d7e327189967a804b388ac0cd@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:46:22 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: Bill Ackman <ackman@persq.com>, “Pershing Square Holdings Ltd: William Clutterbuck” <wclutterbuck@maitland.co.uk>, Media <Media-pershingsquareholdings@maitland.co.uk>, Pershing Square Foundation <info@persq.org>, Francis McGill <mcgill@persq.com>, Farrell Sklerov <sklerov@gmail.com>, Steve Murray <smurray@rubenstein.com>, Peter Foley <pfoley@rubenstein.com>
Message-ID: <847c598bb8bd26c4de6bd5646480d3f3@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:46:37 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: Warren Buffet <wbuffett@berkshirehathaway.com>, Berkshire Hathaway <berkshire@berkshirehathaway.com>
Message-ID: <c222147e4157ea06fd052aa2ea1ed6b5@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:46:55 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: “Patrice Motsepe via ARM: African Rainbow Minerals: Comp Sec: Alyson DOyley” <alyson.doyley@arm.co.za>, “Corporate Development: Jongisa Magagula” <jongisa.magagula@arm.co.za>, Corporate Office <ir.admin@arm.co.za>, “Corporate Social Investment: Charlotte Stoole” <charlotte.stoole@arm.co.za>, “ARM: Patrice Motsepe” <patrice.motsepe@arm.co.za>, Jongisa Magagula <jongisa.magagula@arm.co.za>, “CEO: Mike Schmidt” <mike.schmidt@arm.co.za>
Message-ID: <637b65ea06f5ea1aca15d9eafb667506@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:47:16 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: “Ted Turner: Debbit Masterson” <debbie.masterson@tedturner.com>, Dave Hunter <dave.hunter@tedturner.com>, Phillip Evans <phillip.evans@tedturner.com>, Mike Phillips <Mike.Phillips@tedturner.com>, Verla Calhoun-Kelley <Verla.Kelley@tedturner.com>, Pam Roberts <pam.roberts@tedturner.com>, Bob Biebel <bob.biebel@tedturner.com>, Christine Hung <Christine.hung@tedturner.com>, US Global Leadership Coalition <info@usglc.org>, Melissa Lieberman <mlieberman@usglc.org>, Nuclear Threat Initiative <contact@nti.org>, Anne Isenhower Communications LLC <anne@anneisenhower.com>, Sierra Grande Lodge & Spa <info@sierragrandelodge.com>, Ted Turner Expeditions <reservations@tedturnerexpeditions.com>, Vermejo Park Ranch <reservations@vermejo.com>, “Merit SI: Austin” <infotx@meritsi.com>, New Jersey <infonj@meritsi.com>, “Laura Turner Seydel: Ron Slotin” <ron@lauraseydel.com>, Stacey Hall <stacy@lauraseydel.com>
Message-ID: <996d016942c9a0921d38a18e54c66391@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:47:38 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: Pierre Omidyar via Omidyar Network <info@omidyar.com>, Media <media@omidyar.com>
Message-ID: <cd497e2d5f7437caf604e493aa2c657d@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:48:09 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: Michael Milken <mmilken@milkeninstitute.org>, Media  <media@mikemilken.com>, Milken Family Foundation <media@mff.org>
Message-ID: <48e8dc526c06dc96c555ec0764fc27ea@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:48:26 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: Mo Ibrahim Foundation <info@moibrahimfoundation.org>, Dakar <sall.s@moibrahimfoundation.org>, Media <media@moibrahimfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <c3a4f62d587f63ef6c0b54bce5e84b27@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:48:42 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: Mo Dewji Family via Mo Dewji Foundation <info@modewjifoundation.org>
Message-ID: <b30e1e62e2b543f685bb0874bb3c0368@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:48:55 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: Michael Bloomberg <mbloomberg@bloomberg.net>, Michael Bloomberg <mike@mikebloomberg.com>
Message-ID: <0b703c4cce3101532ccdae5faa270fa1@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:49:12 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: Mackenzie Bezos via Jeff Bezos <jeff@amazon.com>, “Martin de Becker: Laveley & Singer: Martin D. Singer” <mdsinger@lavelysinger.com>
Message-ID: <ed6e66cd7ae2c17edbe9a8cb1152f384@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:49:26 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: Tom Steyer via Need to Impeach <info@needtoimpeach.com>, Tom Steyer <info@tomsteyer.com>, Press <press@tomsteyer.com>
Message-ID: <a69d3354746fb2b6edf5a09e5b40501c@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:49:46 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: “Mark Zuckerberg via Facebook Counsel: Facebook Inc: Colin Stretch” <colin@fb.com>, Sandeep Solanki <ssolanki@fb.com>, “Outside Counsel: Cooley LLP: Michael Rhodes” <mrhodes@cooley.com>, Matthew Brown <brownmd@cooley.com>, Jeffrey Gutkin <jgutkin@cooley.com>
Message-ID: <44eac02398d801b10a6ac461fdec37cf@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:50:04 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: “Vladimir Potanin via Interros: Alexey Bashkirov” <info@interros.ru>, Norisk Nickel <gmk@nornik.ru>, “Polar Press Office: Mikhail Demyanov” <secretardos@nornik.ru>, “Investor Relations: Vladimir Zhukov” <ir@nornik.ru>, Mikhail Borovikov <borovikovma@nornik.ru>, Corporate Trust Service <skd@nornik.ru>
Message-ID: <9f8587be0a8e8fd7b90212d8a16350fc@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:50:22 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: “Bridge Water Associates: Ray Dalio” <dalio@bwater.com>, Bridgewater Corporate Counsel <Corporate_Counsel@bwater.com>, “Connecticut Attorney General: William Tong” <attorney.general@ct.gov>, AG Legal <info@aglegal.com>, Seeds of Peace <info@seedsofpeace.org>, Jerusalem <jerusalem@seedsofpeace.org>, London <london@seedsofpeace.org>, Leslie Adelson Lewin <leslie@seedsofpeace.org>, Paul Dalio via Kristina Nikolova <kristina.nikolova22@gmail.com>, Remy Cayuela <contact@remycayuela.com>, Dalio Foundation <inquiries@daliofoundation.org>, Media <media.inquiries@daliofoundation.org>
Message-ID: <b8932d56f97dfb2185893ef343cd17e5@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:50:41 +0200
Subject: Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report
To: Laura and John Arnold Foundation via Jon Baron <jbaron@arnoldfoundation.org>, Stuart Buck <sbuck@arnoldfoundation.org>, Vanessa Goodwin <vgoodwin@arnoldfoundation.org>, Chase Sackett <csackett@arnoldfoundation.org>, Kirby Smith <ksmith@arnoldfoundation.org>, Mary Catherine Jones <mjones@arnoldfoundation.org>, “Center for Open Science: Brian Nosek” <contact@osf.io>, John Ioannidis <jioannid@stanford.edu>, Steven Goodman <steve.goodman@stanford.edu>, Ben Goldacre <ben@badscience.net>, Daniel Gilbert <gilbert@wjh.harvard.edu>, John DAgostino via World Capital Markets <delyanan@seccom.com.my>, “EconTalk: Russ Roberts” <russroberts@gmail.com>, Leslie Alvarez <lcramblet@adams.edu>
Message-ID: <9d77a3ff7306ac72d36adf78bfc3ecf2@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za
Attachment: A2ba_20-01-30_LJvLS_EoPUNRes-Decl_E-MCOath.pdf

.

TO: JP Morgan: Jamie Dimon:
CC: Risky Business: Michael R. Bloomberg, Henry M. Paulson Jr., Thomas F. Steyer
CC: Johann Rupert, George Soros, Ben Bernanke.
CC: Giving Pledge Oligarchs
Re: 22 Feb: McVeigh2020: EoP Re: JP Morgan: Risky business: Climate and Oligarch economy

Mr Dimon and Risky Business Report Authors:

Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report:

JP Morgan: Risky Business Report: It is a global problem but no global solution is in sight. …. No government seems willing to sacrifice the incomes of their current citizens either in favor of their children and grandchildren or in favor of citizens in other countries. – JP Morgan: Risky business: the climate and the oligarch economy …. CO2 emissions as a global externality. Climate change reflects a global market failure in the sense that producers and consumers of CO2 emissions do not pay for the climate damage that results. The standard economic answer to such an externality is a Pigovian tax: essentially a tax on CO2 emissions. This would provide incentives to producers to shift production in a less CO2 intensive direction, to consumers to shift consumption to less CO2 intensive goods and services and to entrepreneurs to encourage innovation in low CO2 technologies. It is best if the CO2 tax is global to deal with the free rider problem. …. One powerful theme running through the climate change debate is uncertainty: uncertainty about the mechanics of climate change and uncertainty about the economic, social and environmental impact of climate change. The other powerful theme running through the climate change debate is fairness: fairness across time as emissions today will affect the climate that future generations will inherit, and fairness across countries between those who have contributed the most to the problem and those who have contributed the least. [SQ Copy: PDF]; via XR-UK: The kids aren’t alright – XRUKs statement on threats of violence towards XR Cambridge.

Ray Dalio: I was so arrogant and I was so wrong. Rather than thinking I am right, I began thinking ‘how do I know I am right? I gained a humility I needed in order to balance with my audacity. I wanted to find the smartest people who would disagree with me to try to understand their perspective or to have them stress test my perspective. I wanted to make an idea meritocracy; in other words not an autocracy in which I would lead and others would follow and not a democracy where everyone’s points of view are equally valued. I wanted an idea meritocracy in which the best ideas would win out. In order to do that I realized we would need radical truthfullness and radical transparency. – TED: Ray Dalio: How to build a company where the best ideas win.

George Soros & Jim Grant: The [WiP] global economy is coming apart at the seams and the worlds needs to be protected from [WiP right to breed / consume / deception] policies that enable people like George Soros [and Mark Zuckerberg, Ted Turner, Charles Koch, Dennis Banks, Jacob Zuma, Cliven Bundy and Brad Blanton]. The [WiP] system is broke and it needs fixing. I think all players should be regulated. There have to be [EoP breeding and consumption; and honesty relating] rules of the game. [EoP Amended] 60 Minutes, 1998.
» IG: 17-06-25_gsoros-eop-oligarchs-corruptiondef.

Authorizing EoP – Procreation, Consumption & Deception Crimes of Aggression Pollution Tax – UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70], to implement Ecology of Peace – aka Return to Steppe Aryan Eden – Scientific and Cultural law as international law would put a Keep It Simple Stupid layperson understood crime of aggression [PDF: crimes-of-aggression] criminal penalty price/tax on procreation & consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits and violation of fully informed consent agreements; and allow for – eco-capitalist, eco-socialist, eco-muslim, eco-christian, eco-aryan, eco-african, eco-zulu, eco-aborigine, eco liberal, eco-conservative, etc – cultural law self rule homelands [PDF: cult-law-self-rule].
» EoP Leg Sub: 02 Feb: TN: LJvFWdK/SGMC: EoP Int: Kremlin – Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Defn – Offer.

EoP SciCult Law will incentivize objective and subjective honest academic truthseeking:
EoP SciCult [PDF: eop-scicultlaw] international law will provide responsible freedom [PDF: responsible-freedom] property ration [PDF: property-ration] security; by restricting everyones procreation / consumption accumulation to ecological carrying capacity limits [PDF: eop-footprint]. When all responsible freedom individuals have property ration self sufficiency security; individuals will use their spare time to engage in activities that sincerely interest them. Similarly individuals who use their spare time to engage in academic – scientific enquiry – etc pursuits will do so out of sincere truthseeking enquiry interests; not for status or financial security. For example: a group of scientists could decide to pool their resources into an Academic Cultural Law Self Rule [PDF: cult-law-self-rule] Eco-Village Homeland; where they can make eco-village agreements as to their collective self sufficiency labour and pooling of funds for scientific research; where everyone contributes partially to eco-village/kibbutz labour and is rewarded with eco-village laboratory resources for their joint scientific research interests. EoP SciCult law incentivizes honesty: when scientists have guaranteed responsible freedom property ration security; they cannot be pressured to engage in deception through the threats of loss of financial security; and since cultural law fully informed consent law crimes of aggression [PDF: crimes-of-aggression] strictly eliminates intentional deceivers from the genepool; they are doubly incentivized to be sincere truthseeking scientists; engaged in scientific research that provides information towards greater sustainability, stability and security and meaningful existential purpose for all.
» EoP Leg Sub: 12 Dec: EoP SciCult Law Property Ration Security for Honesty Academic Truthseeking.

Overview:
* Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Report:
* There is very little uncertainty and no unfairness in EoP culture climate debate / solutions
* Climate Change is Global problem, EoP SciCult UN Resolution is a binding international law global solution
* Goverments are Unwilling to Sacrifice Citizen Incomes on Behalf of Future Generations
* If Oligarchs are willing to Make Procreation / Consumption / Relating Sacrifices on Behalf of Future Generations
* Science Sponsored by Fuck Objective & Subjective Honesty Oligarch Culture Philanthropy
* Disclosure: EoP v XR
* EoP culture re Questions

Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Report:

“Science is built like a building,” John Arnold says. “One floor on top of the next.” In nutrition, “the whole foundation of the research had been flawed. All these things that we thought we knew—when we step back and look at the evidence base—it’s just not there.” Arnold says that now, unless he trusts a researcher’s work, he no longer believes the findings of any scientific study until he or someone on the staff carefully vets the paper. “A new study shows …” are “the four most dangerous words,” Arnold wrote on Twitter. Together with Taubes’ work, Arnold was also reading Ioannidis’ and Gold­acre’s equally devastating analyses. These critiques of science amounted to a deep philosophical quandary for the Arnolds, philanthropists who had dedicated their lives to a data-based approach to giving. “In everything they do, they want to be evidence-driven,” says Stuart Buck, vice president of research integrity at the Arnold Foundation. But if you look at the studies that can’t be reproduced and other issues facing science, “you start to think: What is evidence? What do we actually know?” – Wired: John Arnold Made a Fortune at Enron. Now he’s declared a war on bad science.
» EoP Leg Sub: 28 Jun: EoP Re: John Arnold’s Doing Good Giving Pledge War on Bad [WiP?] Science.

In my opinion I am by far the most honest person in South Africa. If however I am wrong, and there is a South African more honest than me, I’d be more than happy to recognize their honesty superiority. EoP MILED Clerk honesty about objective [eop-rh-fr] and subjective [eop-rh-iqo] truth aka reality.
» EoP Leg Sub: 05 Dec: EoP Re: Johann Rupert President of Racist White South Africa [password]; 07 Oct: EoP TRC Negotiations Informed Consent Courtesy Notice to Ashley Kavanaugh.

If objective honesty and accuracy is important to JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ report authors.

What Ecology of Peace culture members objectively actually know:

Ecology of Peace Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Transforming the World Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors:
Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] and EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] are EoP culture’s functional group shared system of thought and action frame of orientation and object of inter-species relating devotion interpretation of reality for individuals whose object of devotion/values include: (i) honest – race, religious, gender and cultural – relationships; (ii) an ecological carrying capacity based perspective of observable factual social contract reality; and (iii) non-violent cooperative root cause problem solving.
* Objective Factual Reality: [1] Earth is not flat. [2] Resources are finite. [3] When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict. [4] Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: climate change, mass migration, poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc. [5] The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.
* Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior: Interpretative Reality: [6] If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate [eop-cooperator.tygae.org.za] to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw] clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 May: LJ v LS Court Filing; 24 Sep: EoP Req for – United Science – Info to SY Team Malizia.

There is very little uncertainty and no unfairness in EoP culture climate debate / solutions. 

One powerful theme running through the climate change debate is uncertainty: uncertainty about the mechanics of climate change and uncertainty about the economic, social and environmental impact of climate change. The other powerful theme running through the climate change debate is fairness: fairness across time as emissions today will affect the climate that future generations will inherit, and fairness across countries between those who have contributed the most to the problem and those who have contributed the least.[SQ Copy: PDF]; via XR-UK: The kids aren’t alright – XRUKs statement on threats of violence towards XR Cambridge

An individual either wants a climate change solution – or any solution to any state of affairs that they consider an individual or collective ‘problem’ – or they are simply engaged in bullshit the public relations verbal diarhea; pretending to care about the particular issue, as a means to get attention or to engage in fake virtue signalling; or to socio-economically profit from pretending to provide a solution.

If they sincerely want a climate change or immigration or universal basic income, etc solution, then if or when a climate change or immigration or universal basic income solution is provided to them that is simply explained that any layperson can understand, that is fairly applied across races, religions, ideologies, genders, etc; that is scientifically sustainable; then they will confirm their unconditional or conditional cooperator willingness to cooperate to implement such solution; or clarify their reasons for failing to cooperate.

If they show fuck all interest in that solution; or willingness to unconditionally or conditionally cooperate to implement such solution; the chances are reasonably high that such individual (a) did not listen to or read the solution correspondence; or (b) if they did: they do not sincerely give a fuck about finding a solution and cooperating to implment a solution. Put differently their ‘concern’ is just – lack of ego/eco literacy character – bullshit the public relations verbal diarhea, attention seeking or virtue signalling status seeking or something to that effect; or pretend to show concern about the problem to socio-politically profit from providing fake solutions.

Most of these ‘virtue signalling’ individuals – Stanley Milgrams 35% –  will ultimately cooperate; once the solution receives media coverage and/or official government authorization; enabling them to satisify their subconscious virtue signalling / attention seeking etc goals; or by publicly shaming them into practicing what they preach. Once the media provide the public with a village idiot solution to any problem, that a half wit sincere hillbilly can understand, the fake ‘problem solvers’ either have to practice what they preach and cooperate to solve the problem; or get out of the ‘problem solving commons discussion’ by departing to another KISS unregulated problem solving commons discussion problem, they can socio-politically profit from pretending to solve with fake Babylon WiP verbal diarhea solutions.

[22] The Milgram experiment was designed to simulate the conditions in which Eichmann operated, and to determine how many individuals would – like Eichmann – follow orders and be obedient to the system in which they operated; and how many would practice civil disobedience and refuse to be obedient to perceived illegal authority. Milgram’s experiment revealed that a significant majority of the population – 65%, like Eichmanns millions of accomplices – merely follow orders, irrespective whether the orders violate their deepest moral beliefs; only 35 % possessed the skills and competencies for civil disobedience.

[23] Furthermore, when [the 35%] individuals could share the responsibility or blame, with just one other person, 92% of individuals would, like Eichmann, cooperate with authority; and refrain from civil disobedience; and only 8% possessed the skills and competencies for civil disobedience.

[25] The relevant questions then become, what are the resources: the emotional, psychological, and socio-political skills and competencies, that:
* the 37% possess, when individually confronting perceived illegal authority; and
* the 8% possess, refusing the given opportunity, from an ideological or social peer, to share the blame, with them; and individually confront perceived illegal authority.

[26] Briefly, those skills and competencies would range from cognitively consciously comprehending an instruction to commit an illegal act from a perceived illegitimate authority; finding an excuse to avoid committing the illegal act; refusing to commit the illegal act; personally confronting the authority as illegitimate; reporting the authority’s illegal acts, to relevant authorities.
– 02 Dec 2009: Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’ [PDF]
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 Feb: Notice to IA Sec of State: Re: RU Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Definition Offer: Iowa Secretary of State: Pro Se Filing Notice: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate [PDF.pp.24]: Annexure: B1ab: 19-12-06: FBI-VA: LJ v BB: Seeds of Russiagate [PDF: pp.15]: B1b: 23 Jan: EoP Req for – BB-Affid Status; RH Circle Fuckery Complaint – Info.

They are however not good – Milgram 8% – a strategic KISS problem/solution formulation – sincerely give a fuck about the problem to invest ego literate feedback time to engage in buck stops here scientific based honest enquiry as to the formulation of the problem / solution – candidates.

They are not good strategic problem/solution formulators to the extent that the problem/solution issue in focus involves conscious or subconscious issues that require them to consciously confront and offend their own ego dictators and/or face to face verbally or in writing offend the ego dictators of crackers or nazis, or niggers or sandniggers, or capitalists or communists, or oligarchs or bankers, or liberals or progressives, or spicks or wetbacks; or japs or chinks; or soldiers or civilians; or priests or ayatollahs, or academics or politicians, etc.

Climate Change is Global problem, EoP SciCult UN Resolution is a binding international law global solution.

It is a global problem but no global solution is in sight.  – JP Morgan: Risky business: the climate and the oligarch economy [SQ Copy: PDF].

Ecology of Peace – Climate and Ecological Emergency – UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law is a global climate solution; enabling orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation return to a – procreation and consumption carbon footprint crime of aggression tax regulated – sustainable low tech agrarian economy.

* EoP UN Resolution [PDF]; Amendment to Crime of Aggression Definition of Rome Statute of Intnl Criminal Court [PDF].
» Definitions / Summaries: Crime of Aggression [PDF]; Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands [PDF]; Ego Literacy [PDF]; EoP Denuclearization [PDF]; EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [PDF]; EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [PDF]; EoP Footprint [PDF]; Land Reform [PDF]; One Child Law [PDF]; Prisoner Pardon [PDF]; Property Ration [PDF]; Responsible Freedom Oath [PDF]; Shut Down Swamp Economy [PDF].
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 May: LJ v LS Court Filing: NoM-Affid: EoP UN Res;

A copy of EoP UN Resolution has been submitted to ICC Prosecutors Office [13 Feb: McVeigh2020 Reg Mail: CO Dist Crt, Crt of Appeals 10th Crct, SCOTUS, ICC Prosecutor Ofc: PDF: pp.10]

Goverments are Unwilling to Sacrifice Citizen Incomes on Behalf of Future Generations.

No government seems willing to sacrifice the incomes of their current citizens either in favor of their children and grandchildren or in favor of citizens in other countries. – JP Morgan: Risky business: the climate and the oligarch economy [SQ Copy: PDF].

America is an Oligarchy; US legislation is oligarchy preference legislation:
“When the preferences of [American oligarchs aka] economic elites and the stands of organized interest groups are controlled for, the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.” – [EoP Amended] Gilens & Page: Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens (2014) [PDF] – Truth Stream Media: This Study Proves Congress Literally Doesn’t Care What You Think; New Yorker: Is America an Oligarchy?; Represent.US: Corruption is Legal in America; David Pakman Show: Princeton Study: US is No Longer an Actual Democracy; BBC: Study: US is an oligarchy, not a democracy; New Eastern Outlook: Princeton makes it official — USA Has Become Oligarchy, No Democracy; Business Insider: Major Study Finds The US Is An Oligarchy.

Rotten Oligarchy: 97.5 % of normal people, prefer to obey ethical laws.
Nestar Russell and Annette Bolton: Awareness of impending climate catastrophe has greatly increased over the last 30 years. Increasing awareness, however, has not translated into decreasing but instead increasing greenhouse gas emissions.  …… Interestingly, as illustrated by Milgram’s previously mentioned Subject Free to Choose Shock Level condition, when ordinary people at the end of an organisational chain (e.g., consumers) are aware of the harmful consequences of their actions and they are then offered the unimpeded option to act ethically, 97.5 per cent chose to do so. As long as their self-interests are not too heavily compromised by manipulative up-stream meddling, Milgram’s research clearly illustrates that most people prefer to pursue what they understand to be the morally right course of action. Thus, perhaps more than any other factor, our present inability to avert climate catastrophe is largely an abuse of (mostly higher) power and a total failure of leadership. The fish rots from the head down. – MPDI: “Climate Catastrophe and Stanley Milgram’s Electric Shock “Obedience” Experiments: An Uncanny Analogy” [PDF].

If the aforementioned studies are accurate or reasonably accurate:

It is unclear whether the EoP – Climate and Ecological Emergency: Scientific and Cultural law – UN Resolution elite obstructionists are primarily government officials or oligarchs or lawyers or bankers etc.

A related issue: The greater the KISS equity legal factor, the cheaper it is for government to implement and enforce a particular law. KISS: Keep it Simple laws are laws that are easily understood by a reasonably sincere layperson, who can easily observe and check that the law is being equally applied to all races, religions, genders, etc. Generally speaking common people are more than willing to make huge – economic, political, social and familial – sacrifices, if they know those sacrifice requests are being equally applied to all races, religions, genders, etc.

Tim Watkins: In the end, Extinction Rebellion is facing the same dilemma that has plagued the environmental movement from the start: * Should it spell out the enormous effort and sacrifice involved in changing course – and thereby risk alienating the majority of those who need to be won over? Or; * Should it pretend – despite all the evidence to the contrary – that a few windmills and solar panels will allow us to continue growing our planet-destroying economy without even pausing to draw a breath. My fear is that – like the various green parties around the world – this latest manifestation of environmentalism will take the second option so as not to scare the horses.  Everything that we do is political.  I am, for example, fully prepared to support and vote for the radical changes that would dismantle, de-grow and disintegrate the current global economic system.  I am prepared to forgo the hi-tech health system that has kept me alive for the last decade; even though its end is likely to result in my own premature death.  I am NOT, however, prepared to make that sacrifice while others continue to have large families, drive cars, fly and use mobile phones. – Consciousness of Sheep: What Extinction Rebellion is getting wrong, via UnDenial.
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Oct: EoP Re: CoS-TW: What Extinction Rebellion is getting wrong; 22 Oct: EoP Re: AKhan: Put Climate Action at Center of Muslim Faith Call to Action.

To the extent that America or any secular or religious duhmockery or autocratic theocratic nation-state-farm [Stefan Molyneux: The Story of [WiP] Enslavement; Human Farming: Our Enslavement] is managed in accordance to the nations oligarch’s preferences [Princeton: Theories of American Politics PDF; MPDI: “Climate Catastrophe and Stanley Milgram’s Electric Shock “Obedience” Experiments: An Uncanny Analogy” PDF], the government – presidents, prime minister, and legislators – are simply the farm managers on the oligarchy controlled nation-state-farms.

The farm managers obey the orders of the oligarchy owners / board of directors. If they don’t they are fired or not rehired; as a result of oligarch funded and sponsored Citizens United v FEC et al and similar legislation.

Generally speaking socialist governments – particularly socialist governments whose socialism included consumption and procreation [Reds: Trailer; AfrinewsItaly: Thomas Sankara: The Upright Man] regulation – have been and are willing to sacrifice the [procreation and consumption scarcity combatant carbon footprint] incomes of their current citizens either in favour of their children and grandchildren or in favour of citizens in other countries.

Generally speaking capitalist government officials – particularly ones whose governments are directly and/or indirectly controlled by oligarchs and multi-national corporations run by oligarchs, such as JP Morgan –  have been unwilling – presumably on the orders of their JP Morgan factory farm slaughterhouse [Obama Deception: False WiP Left Right paradigm; Stefan Molyneux: The Story of [WiP] Enslavement; Human Farming: Our Enslavement; PETA: Sunny Acre Farms] oligarch masters – to sacrifice the [procreaton and/or consumption scarcity combatant footprint] incomes of their current citizens either in favor of their children and grandchildren or in favor of citizens in other countries.

If Oligarchs are willing to Make Procreation / Consumption / Relating Sacrifices on Behalf of Future Generations.

If Oligarchs are willing to make procreation, consumption and relating sacrifices on behalf of future generations; such oligarchs are welcome to provide their Politician – farm manager – employees with an EoP Axis Alliance Mandate

EoP MILED Clerk – on behalf of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants] – Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End the Abel and Kane Cold War strategic and tactical – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior [eop-rh-fr] – recommendations to Commanders in Chief of NATO, Red Army and People’s Liberation Army [lj-v-ls] is to form an EoP Axis [eop-axis] alliance to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law, via EoP UN Resolution [PDF pp.25-66/70: eop-un-res]; to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation by  (a) requiring all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizing all property and providing all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) cultural law self rule homelands for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future. With regard to military/national/public service: The implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law would allow for orderly and humane abolition of tax funded standing armies and political representatives to be replaced by responsible freedom citizen militia and political representatives. Sincere peacenik / honourable warrior citizens can sign their unconditional or conditional cooperator EoP Axis Oaths [eop-axis-oath] to provide their Heads of State with an EoP Axis Alliance: EoP UN Resolution mandate.
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 Feb: Notice to IA Sec of State: Re: RU Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Definition Offer: Iowa Secretary of State: Pro Se Filing Notice: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate [PDF.pp.24]: Annexure: E1ac [PDF: pp.16] E1c: 03 Dec: McVeigh2020 TN to US Pres Cand. EoP Re: Nat Comm on Mil, Natl & Pub Svc Enq.

They can:
[A] Sign their individual Mandate Cooperator EoP Axis Oath [PDF: MC Oath LS Encl PDF]
[B] Get their Corporations Secretary or General Counsel to sign their Corporate Mandate Cooperator EoP Axis Oath; and attach all the individual Mandate Cooperator EoP Axis Oaths to the Corporate Mandate Oath.
[C] Submit to EoP MILED Clerk to be published at EoP Axis Oaths [eop-axis-oath]

If so: then it can be said that there are a few, or many Oligarch corporate government officials willing to sacrifice the incomes of their current employees either in favor of their children and grandchildren or in favor of employees in other corporations, and/or the employees in other nations.

If so: the JP Morgan Risky Business Reports criticism of government officials failure to act on climate change; is a reasonable criticism .

If JP Morgan Murder Inc Oligarchy Duhmockery don’t want to file their Mandate Cooperator EoP Axis Oath with EoP MILED Clerk [eop-axis-oath]; and want to provide their farm managers an EoP Axis Alliance mandate; they can ask President Donald Trump, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Justice John Roberts to setup a formal EoP Axis Oath registry office court venue before a transparency minded US judge, where US and foreign citizens and corporations can file their Mandate Cooperator EoP Axis Oaths into the court record; to provide General Milley, President Trump, Speaker Pelosi et al with an EoP Axis Oath Alliance mandate.

Science Sponsored by Fuck Objective & Subjective Honesty Oligarch Culture Philanthropy:

Q: How do you create what you call a shared-consciousness culture?. EoP MILED Clerk: If you want to recruit people like me; you are very honest; you answer my questions, you listen to my constructive criticism feedback, and earn my trust, about what exactly our ultimate ‘shared consciousness teams’ goals are. Everyone is required to abide by whatever our team rules are. If you want to recruit a bunch of fragile ego morons addicted to being flattered or bribed with ‘success’ or their ‘career’ or whatever the fuck their fragile little ego’s need to feel part of a ‘[insert feelgood psychobabble bullshit to appease individuals existential economic, racial, religious, class, gender insecurity]’ team; then of course you would tell them whatever the fuck you think the fragile ego snowflakes want to hear.
» » EoP Leg Sub: 21 Nov: EoP: Re: Combat Consultant: Q&A With Retired General Stanley McChrystal.

Ray Dalio: The greatest tragedy of mankind — or one of them — is that people needlessly hold wrong opinions in their minds. All opinions are not equal. Peter Blanken: I have been in a few situations recently where people I respect and love have given me their opinion on certain matters. I have also had the dubious pleasure of listening to less-than-credible “specialists” mouth-fart about subjects they in actually did not know a lot about. ….. The greatest tragedy of mankind — or one of them — is that people needlessly hold wrong opinions in their minds. All opinions are not equal. And it is not the person we love or respect who necessarily has an opinion which really counts, at least not if they lack believability. Ray Dalio defines believability as follows: “Believable people as those who have repeatedly and successfully accomplished the thing in question — who have a strong track record with at least three successes — and have great explanations of their approach when probed”. From this he extracts another very valuable thought which many people who argue for the sake of arguing would do better to consider: “If both parties are peers, it’s appropriate to argue. But if one person is clearly more knowledgable than the other, it is preferable for the less knowledgeable person to approach the more knowledgable one as a student and for the more knowledgable one to act as a teacher”. Now, in Bridgewater’s organization they have figured this out to the most granular level, because they actually assign a believability score to each participant in a discussion, in real time. This means that when the organisation needs to make important investment decisions, they will take each person’s input and put that through the filter. This may lead to a decision being voted for by a majority, but actually rejected, because the believability score of that majority was lower than the assigned knowledge, experience or background of the minority. That’s pretty powerful stuff. ………. When two people believe opposing things, chances are that one of them is wrong. It pays to find out if that someone is you. …. holding wrong opinions in one’s head and making bad decisions based on them instead of having thoughtful disagreements is one of the greatest tragedies of mankind. ….. That quote is from Ray Dalio, the founder and Grand Poobah at Bridgewater Associates, the largest hedge fund in the world and a successful billionaire entrepreneur. Dalio likes to develop the idea of thoughtful disagreement, in which the goal is not to convince the opposite party that you are right, but simply to find out which view is true and then what to do about it.  Both parties must be motivated by a genuine fear of missing important perspectives. In such a situation it is about exploring the truth and not simply arguing. Or “winning” the argument. In reality, the winners of an argument, if there is such a thing, are those who leave the discussion having learned something. Whereas the losers are those who stubbornly cling to their thoughts, beliefs and reasoning without having given any consideration to the others’ point of view. What is interesting is that, being from a multi-cultural European background, I very frequently see how this plays out depending on the origins of the parties involved. Often, discussions get more heated with people from the south of Europe, considered more “hot-blooded”, than people from the North, more “cold-blooded”. The next time you find yourself in a discussion seemingly not leading towards agreement or resolution, consider this notion of thoughtful disagreement. Try to stand apart from the discussion. Hold you tongue and go through these 3 steps: * Listen with intent, meaning that you seek to understand the other person’s viewpoint first and foremost. * Take into consideration how believable the other person is. Find points of agreement and build on those. Determine points of disagreement and focus on clarifying them. * Stay open to the notion that if the 2 ideas are opposing, and one of them could be wrong, there is actually a possibility the person having it wrong is you. You might also consider sharing this methodology with the ”opposing” party and see if that improves the quality of the exchange. The goal should not be to bludgeon the other into accepting your views, but to leave the disagreement smarter that when you started and that this leads to improved decision making and a harmonious conclusion. – CNBC: Ray Dalio says ‘greatest tragedy of mankind’ is people clinging to wrong opinions; The Startup: How to have better discussions — the art of thoughtful disagreement; How to make better decisions: consider Believability.
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 Feb: Notice to IA Sec of State: Re: RU Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Definition Offer: Iowa Secretary of State: Pro Se Filing Notice: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate [PDF.pp.24]: Annexure: A6a: 06 Aug: LJ v LS CEO Req for Invest Info: Peter Blanken & Michael Burry.

John D’Agostino, former head of strategy of the New York Mercantile Exchange: If John Arnold decided he wanted to beat hunger. I wouldn’t want to bet on hunger. “You don’t shift a culture overnight,” Nosek says. But as many Wall Street veterans can testify, betting against John Arnold is usually a bad idea.  Brian Nosek had pretty much given up on finding a funder. For two years he had sent out grant proposals for his software project. And for two years they had been rejected again and again—which was, by 2011, discouraging but not all that surprising to the 38-year-old scientist. An associate professor at the University of Virginia, Nosek had made a name for himself in a hot subfield of social psychology, studying people’s unconscious biases. But that’s not what this project was about. At least, not exactly. Like a number of up-and-coming researchers in his generation, Nosek was troubled by mounting evidence that science itself—through its systems of publication, funding, and advancement—had become biased toward generating a certain kind of finding: novel, attention grabbing, but ultimately unreliable. The incentives to produce positive results were so great, Nosek and others worried, that some scientists were simply locking their inconvenient data away. The problem even had a name: the file drawer effect. And Nosek’s project was an attempt to head it off at the pass. He and a graduate student were developing an online system that would allow researchers to keep a public log of the experiments they were running, where they could register their hypotheses, methods, workflows, and data as they worked. That way, it would be harder for them to go back and cherry-pick their sexiest data after the fact—and easier for other researchers to come in and replicate the experiment later. Nosek was so taken with the importance of redoing old experiments that he had also rallied more than 50 like-minded researchers across the country to participate in something he called the Reproducibility Project. The aim was to redo about 50 studies from three prominent psychology journals, to establish an estimate of how often modern psychology turns up false positive results. It was little wonder, then, that funders didn’t come running to support Nosek: He wasn’t promising novel findings, he was promising to question them. So he ran his projects on a shoestring budget, self-­financing them with his own earnings from corporate speaking engagements on his research about bias. The Reproducibility Project, meanwhile, swelled to include more than 270 researchers working to reproduce 100 psychology experiments—and in August 2015, Nosek revealed its results. Ultimately his army of volunteers could verify the findings of only about 40 percent of the studies. Media reports declared the field of psychology, if not all of science, to be in a state of crisis. It became one of the biggest science stories of the year. But as it happens, Nosek is just one of many researchers who have received unsolicited emails from the Arnold Foundation in the past few years—researchers involved in similar rounds of soul-searching and critique in their own fields, who have loosely amounted to a movement to fix science.John Ioannidis was put in touch with the Arnolds in 2013. A childhood math prodigy turned medical researcher, Ioannidis became a kind of godfather to the science reform crowd in 2005, when he published two devastating papers—one of them titled simply “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” Now, with a $6 million initial grant from the Arnold Foundation, Ioannidis and his colleague Steven Goodman are setting out to turn the study of scientific practice—known as meta-research—into a full-fledged field in its own right, with a new research center at Stanford. British doctor Ben Gold­acre also got an email from the Arnold Foundation in 2013. Famous in England as a sharp-witted scourge of “bad science,” Goldacre spent years building up a case that pharmaceutical companies, by refusing to reveal all their data, have essentially deceived the public into paying for worthless therapies. Now, with multiple grants from the Arnolds, he is leading an effort to build an open, searchable database that will link all publicly available information on every clinical trial in the world. And those are just a few of the people who are calling out iffy science with Arnold funding. Laura and John Arnold didn’t start the movement to reform science, but they have done more than anyone else to amplify its capabilities—typically by approaching researchers out of the blue and asking whether they might be able to do more with more money. “The Arnold Foundation has been the Medici of meta-research,” Ioannidis says. All told, the foundation’s Research Integrity initiative has given more than $80 million to science critics and reformers in the past five years alone. …  Arnold had always been ready to make huge bets, but it was ultimately his hunger for reliable data that made him a brilliant trader. That same hunger would make large-scale philanthropy far more challenging than he had anticipated. In a glass conference room at the Arnold Foundation’s offices—which occupy the same space as the old Centaurus trading floor, a 15-minute drive from the glass tower whose entrance was once adorned with Enron’s famous E—Arnold explains that his and Laura’s initial plan had been to simply locate the most effective organizations and write them checks. But figuring out which organizations were most effective turned out to be vexing. Nonprofits are very good at reporting their success rates and citing the science behind their interventions, but dig into their claims—as the Arnolds would try to do—and you find that they often omit relevant context or confuse correlation with causation. “The more you read the research, the less you know,” Arnold says. “It became extraordinarily frustrating.” – Wired: John Arnold Made a Fortune at Enron. Now he’s declared a war on bad science.

Werner Erhard change – end mechanical anus hunger – culture vision:
At Landmark – formerly Erhard Seminars Training, or est  –  when you know you’re a mechanical anus, you’ve ”got it.” …… Werner Erhard: If we have any desire to create an alternative future, it is only going to happen through a shift in our language. If we want a change in culture, for example, the work is to change the conversation–or, more precisely, to have a conversation that we have not had before, one that has the power to create something new in the world. …. 1976 Ex-Yippie Jerry Rubin recounts Erhard’s spiel: “He listened to people’s miseries, laughed in their faces and screamed, ‘YOU ASSHOLE, YOU CAUSED IT!’” 2007: Erhard unveils new management philosophy coauthored with a Harvard Business School professor and the CEO of Landmark’s consulting arm. Message: “Integrity is the pathway to trust.”  …… Let them Eat Est: In 1977, EST GURU Werner Erhard had a vision: He was going to end world hunger by 1997. To that end, he started the Hunger Project, a nonprofit that quickly picked up celebrity sponsors including John Denver, Valerie Harper, and Jimmy Carter‘s son Chip. But, as Mother Jones reported in December 1978, the group had no intention of actually feeding the starving, just raising “awareness” of hunger—and est. What forces caused hunger in the first place? Erhard is vague about this. “Call them political forces, if you like, he advises generously. “Study the political forces and you will see that hunger and starvation on the planet are inevitable result of those forces. If you don’t like the politics, do it with economic forces. If you don’t like the economics, do it with sociological forces, psychological forces, philosophical forces. Or if you prefer, a combination of them. …… I suggest that this transformational process requires at least one necessary ingredient without which philosophical counseling would not be possible. Whether implicitly or explicitly, both counselor and client need the virtue of courage in its form as “philosophical courage” in order for the counseling to be successful. Moreover, the degree of such courage in both client and counselor will determine the extent to which issues are brought into question. There is another form of courage—philosophical courage—required of individuals in dealing with their most fundamental beliefs and values. I believe the best way to demarcate roughly the different forms of courage, is through an analysis of the cost involved with each form of the virtue. First, with physical courage, the possible cost involved, at the extreme, is the physical loss of life. Second, with moral courage, the possible cost is social rejection and isolation and/or a loss of “ethical integrity or authenticity”. Third, with “psychological courage,” the possible cost perceived by the individual is “psychic death.” And fourth, with “philosophical courage” the possible cost is philosophical instability where one’s most fundamental beliefs and values are brought into doubt. It demands of the individual a confrontation with fundamental beliefs and values”. – Cult Education Institute: Psychology Today: ”We’re Gonna Tear You Down and Put You Back Together”; Werner Erhard: Culture Change Requires New Conversation; Mother Jones: From Erhard to Harvard: A Landmark Timeline; New York Times: The Return of Werner Erhard, Father of Self-Help; Mother Jones: The Hunger Artist:Let them Eat Est; Let them Eat Est [PDF]; NPCA: National Philosophical Counseling Association: The Role of Philosophical Courage in Philosophical Counseling.
» EoP Leg Sub: 24 Dec: Twitter, Comey: EoP Honesty or WiP Est ID Politics, State v LJ & LJ v B Blanton.

It is pointless joining an – undefined end mechanical anus hunger etc – academic ‘alliance’ where the ‘alliance’ has no clear KISS – keep it simple stupid – objective reality foundational definitions and principles; and clear ego literate [ego-eco-literacy] communication policy principles to reach ‘KISS shared consciousness’ culture connection. If you sincerely want to ‘inform the general public’; how do you intend to do so; if your message is not KISS: keep it simple stupid; to enable lay-people to have an ‘I got it’ connection understanding of the concepts being conveyed. If any ALERT scientist and/or the ALERT Information Officer has any questions and/or KISS constructive criticism feedback; about EoP RH FR objective reality alliance goals; and/or Ego Literacy communication; such questions and/or feedback shall be responded to by EoP MILED Clerk; and published at EoP Legal Sub [eop-leg-sub-corr]
» EoP Leg Sub: 14 Dec: EoP Re: AWS MEGA ALERT Re: EoP SciCult Law Property Ration Security for Honesty Academic Truthseeking.

EoP MILED Clerk had pretty much given up on finding Blanton Radical Honesty, Erhard Landmark; Dalio-Comey-Bridgewater-FBI Radical Transparency, et al – EoP / OKC sincere peacenik / honourable warrior Truth and Reconcliation – funding, when she got an email from the FSB [17 Feb: FSB: AM Kalganov; 17 Feb: Kremlin, FSB: Igor Strelkov: Acknowledged Receipt].

Global oligarch philanthropy in support of:
WiP Charities / Academic Research: ~ $25 Billion [OECD]; $150 Billion [UBS].
EoP Charities / Academic Research: 0 cents

Global military philanthropy in support of EoP Academic Research:
FSB, NSA honesty transparency surveillance [21 Feb: TN: DNI-SPierson: RU Offer: Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Definition].

Scientists and charity workers working for WiP fragile ego oligarchs and their fragile ego –– conscious or unconscious fuck honour oligarch pretends to give a fuck about climate change, mass migration, poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc; while doing sweet goddamn fuck all to buttfuck order their foundation employees to  strategically and tactically unconditionally or conditionally cooperate [eop-axis-oath] to abolish the WiP clauses of international law that enable procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits that are the root causes of all ecological, military, political, economic, racial, religious, gender resource conflict ––  philanthropic foundations face the same WiP law ‘befehl is befehl’ resource thieving academic / charity research conclusion orders, as soldiers given ‘befehl is befehl’ resource thieving mass murder WiP Babylon law orders.

According to a report from the New York Times, longtime government employees who landed their jobs because of their Republican bonafides are now coming to work each day with the threat of dismissal hanging over their heads if it is believed they are are not totally on board with Donald Trump policies. Following a report that Johnny McEntee, a 29-year-old loyalist just installed to take over the Office of Presidential Personnel, is instructing “departments to search for people not devoted to the president so they can be removed,” the Times notes that just because a staffer is a Republican in good standing doesn’t mean that won’t be booted. – Raw Story: GOP appointees considered disloyal to Trump won’t be spared as president’s new hatchet-man begins purge: report.

**

The only question is whether EoP SciCult law or WiP Babylon law should be master intnl law; that’s all

Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix Reality doctrine — the Inalienable ‘Right to Breed and Consume, but you need a License to Own a Gun, a License to Drive a Car, a License to Practice Law, a television license, a credit license, a license to earn a living, a university exemption license, a license to fish, a license to hunt, a liquor license, a business license, a marriage license, in some U.S. states, five year olds, even need to get a license to run a lemonade stand on their front lawn — hypocritically referred to as the ‘rule-of-law’ is a legal world of lawyers, politicians and priests, who prefer to negligently ignore, plausibly deny, or socio-psycho-phallicly benefit from the conquer-and-multiply and divide and conquer control over the means of human reproduction and consumption. It is a Matrix reality, of legal, political and religious indulgence salesmen.

It is a legal world, very similar to the Matrix religious world that existed before Martin Luther confronted the religious indulgence salesmen with his Ninety-Five Theses, on the Church of All Saints, on 31 October 1517, thereby initiating the Protestant Reformation.

In the Catholic Church’s religious Matrix world, only Catholic Bishops were entitled to be interpreters of the ‘word of god’. Only they could decide what God meant, about who was guilty and who was innocent, who would go to hell and who would go to heaven. God did not speak to common people, except via the Catholic Church’s bishops.

In Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix world, only those who swear blind obedience to Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix world – lawyers, prosecutors and judges – are deemed to possess the supposed superior intellectual Legal Godlike capabilities, to decipher, decode and interpret the ‘word of civilized patriarch gods’, hence capable of deciding which of us mere Commons surplus cannon fodder mortals acts of commission, or omission, is ‘lawful’ or ‘unlawful’.

Civilized Patriarchy’s Legal Matrix ‘AnthroCorpocentric law’ is based upon Flat Earth ‘jurisprudence’, as per the demands of those capable of purchasing Flat Earth legislation indulgences which make their ecologically – breeding/consumption war — criminal acts, to be deemed as ‘legal/lawful’ conduct by the Legal Matrix Bishops: lawyers, prosecutors and Judges.

It is a Matrix world of legal indulgence salesmen; who — ‘Contempt in Facie Curiae’ — demand the public’s sycophantic submissive obedience; for their supposed superior intellectual Godlike capabilities, to decipher, decode and interpret which of us mere Commons surplus cannon and vote fodder mortals acts of commission, or omission, is ‘lawful’ or ‘unlawful’.

Surplus vote fodder citizens may convert to becoming cannon-fodder citizens by joining the military to commit conquering or culling acts of murder and theft, as long as their murder and theft is sanctioned as a lawful conquer, culling or theft order, by one or more groups of left/right conquer-and-multiply legal indulgence salesmen.

In this Matrix Reality legal world, soldiers tasked with the national security conquering and culling responsibilities, of conquering to thieve another tribe’s resources, and culling population ‘useless eaters’ and ‘oxygen thieves’ surplus population excesses; on behalf of the conquering and culling profiteering demands of civilized patriarchy’s civilian corporate and political elite; constantly find themselves confronted with the conquer-or-culling “Befehl ist Befehl” Catch 22 dilemma:

To obey, or not to obey, a ‘Lebensraum’, ‘Difaqane’, ‘Operation Freedumb’ and the thousands like them, order to conquer or cull; since a lawful conquer or culling order, by one group of left/right conquer-and-multiply legal indulgence salesmen, can easily be reinterpreted to be an unlawful order, by another group of opposing left/right conquer-and multiply legal indulgence salesmen; presenting a Catch 22 dilemma from which there is no legal escape.

One who refuses a ‘lawful’ conquering or culling order will still probably be jailed for refusing orders, and one who accepts an ‘unlawful order will be jailed for committing unlawful culling or conquering acts.

Who decides, what is, and what is not, a conquering or culling lawful, or unlawful order?

The ‘Inalienable Right to Breed’ Matrix Reality conquer-and-multiply indulgence salesmen, with their specious justifications, and nightmare of Legal Matrix reality generated bureaucratic stare-decisis cryptic rules and statutes, of course!

“I don’t know what you mean by ‘glory,’” Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. “Of course you don’t—till I tell you. I meant ‘there’s a nice knock-down argument for you!’”
“But ‘glory’ doesn’t mean ‘a nice knock-down argument’,” Alice objected.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
“The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.”
“The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”
— Through the Looking Glass, by Lewis Carroll

Anthropocentric Master’s of ‘Relevance’ Jurisprudence:

The question in a Babylon War is Peace civilized patriarchy court is only concerned with who is the master of one word: ‘relevance’.

Any question or answer that exposes civilized patriarchy’s Legal Matrix system for what it is; a system far more corrupt than the Catholic Church’s Indulgences for Sale religious matrix, is simply deemed as ‘irrelevant’.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges defy the laws of ecology with a massive ‘fuck you’, by legislating, interpreting and enforcing Legal Matrix doctrine, that encourages citizens to breed and consume above cultural carrying capacity limits.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges know that legislation which ignores carrying capacity limits results in ecological overshoot, surplus vote-cannon-fodder populations, economic hierarchical inequality, and scarcity induced local, national and international conflict.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges know that legislation which enables ecological overshoot in multi-cultural/ethnic/religious communities, manifests as inter-cultural / ethnic / religious conflict.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges know that inter-cultural / ethnic conflict is a great divide and conquer tool to manipulate the proletariat to perceive other cultural/ethnic proletariat as the source of their own overshoot-scarcity-conflict misery.

It is ‘irrelevant’ that legislators, lawyers, courts and judges sit in judgement about an accused’s case of theft or murder; while consciously ignoring the theft and thievery and participation in mass murder of the civilized patriarchy corporate elite, who purchased ‘Innocence for Sale’ Indulgences from legislators to avoid legislation that defines their ecologically criminal acts of billion and trillion dollar thievery and murder as ‘unlawful’.

What is relevant?:

It is relevant that civilized patriarchy’s penis constitutions human factory farming rights to breed and consume, is to be master —that’s all.

Who says so?:

Civilized Patriarchy’s ecologically illiterate Legal Matrix Legislator’s, lawyers, judges and prosecutors ego-genitals say so!
» EoP Leg Sub: 25 Jan: USAR Ft Bragg: Culture Change to EoP Honour Ecofootprint Shrinking Lifeboat Ethics?; 27 Nov: LJ Re: Solicitors Regulation Authority: Nicolas Leach: Re: Upd: LJ v Speaker: House of Commons & 11 Others; 30 Jan: EoP v WiP Law Relevance Defns A: Re JManchin: If its relevant I want to hear it; 14 Feb: EoP Re: John Kelly: Kim Jongun is fake peacenik; Trump Zelensky order illegal..

Disclosure: EoP v XR:

I saw the JP Morgan: Risky Business quote – No government seems willing to sacrifice the incomes of their current citizens either in favor of their children and grandchildren or in favor of citizens in other countries – at XR: The kids aren’t alright – XRUKs statement on threats of violence towards XR Cambridge; a few days after receiving an email from York academic: Timothy Stuart-Buttle [20 Feb: Tim Stuart-Buttle: Lara Johnstone; 22 Feb: EoP /OKC TRC Neg’s: Tim Stuart-Buttle publishing request], who is a former Cambridge academic.

As of date, none of Extinction Rebellion’s UK, US or South African leadership have been willing to sign their Mandate Cooperator EoP Axis Oaths, to provide their Head of State and Parliament with an EoP Axis Oath alliance mandate.

Nor have Extinction Rebellion leaders and/or General Counsel been willing to accept Ecology of Peace recommendations to request UK political, executive or juridical government official/s to setup a formal EoP Axis Oath registry office court venue before a transparency minded UK judge, where UK and foreign citizens and corporations can file their Mandate Cooperator EoP Axis Oaths into the court record; to provide General Carter, Prime Minister Johnson, Speaker Hoyle et al with an EoP Axis Oath Alliance mandate.

Albert Bartlett: The greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential growth/degrowth function.
Exponential growth / degrowth work the same way. If exponential growth is the strongest force in history [Bartlett: Arithmetic, Population and Energy, Crash Course: Exponential Growth & Power of Compounding; World Population Balance: Understanding Exponential Growth; Growth Busters: Limits to Growth: Bacteria in a Bottle], exponential degrowth is the equal and opposite strongest force with which to fight exponential growth. Racial, religious, class and gender ecological overshoot resource conflict is a direct consequence of exponential population / consumption growth; which is a direct consequence of exponential function illiterate international law legislation allowing it to occur. Similarly EoP SciCult international law orderly and humane exponential population degrowth can be a direct consequence of exponential function literate lawmakers legislation. China Great Leap Forward: 1958-1961: enabled population Degrowth/Reduction from 56 million to 41 million [IG: Chefurka World Pop Growth: 1910 – 2010]. Climate change benefits via reforestation due to depopulation are massive [The Guardian: European colonization of America’s killed so many it cooled Earth’s climate: SQ Copy; Daily Mail: Genghis Khan the GREEN: Invader killed so many people that carbon levels plummeted: SQ Copy]. In the context of current massive ecological overshoot and climate change, mitigation requires not ‘zero carbon footprints’, but negative – degrowth – carbon footprints. EoP SciCult law – based on EoP Footprint – advocates for (a) a global one child law, which is a negative – 50% degrowth – procreation footprint law [Oregon Univ: Murtaugh: Every child increases a parents carbon footprint by a factor of 20: SQ Copy]; combined with a (b) zero carbon footprint consumption law. In combination they are an End Ecocide 25% degrowth carbon footprint’ international law policy. When population reaches ecological carrying capacity limits, the one child law can become a two child law, whereupon the law will be a zero carbon footprint law. Similarly as population decreases, individuals property rations are allowed to increase; until carrying capacity limits where property rations no longer increase, and population and consumption growth are both at zero percent, slightly lower than ecological carrying capacity limits.
» EoP Leg Sub: 19 May: EoP TRC Info for Kyle Kulinski, Sean Duffy R-WI & Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez D-NY

EoP culture re Questions:

EoP MILED Clerk does not require a formal – service by a sheriff – legal process for any request for information. An email with questions, or for a request for particular information or evidence is sufficient. All emails with a request for information – irrespective of the race, class, religion, gender of the author, or the size of their country, or whether they have zero police wo/men, or nuclear weapons – are given the benefit of the doubt that they are an honourable request for information and responded to in accordance with EoP Ego/Eco literacy [ego-eco-literacy] communication policy. No lawyers or Sheriffs or Judges required to get a buck stops here [eop-rh-cult-info.tygae.org.za] answer to any question.  EoP Responsible Freedom represents ‘walk our sincere peacenik talk’ path towards smallest government in the world. When every citizen in a nation is a responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za] citizen aka volunteer citizen militia / sheriff: Babylon Masonic War is Peace factory farm slaughterhouse [Obama Deception: False WiP Left Right paradigm; Stefan Molyneux: The Story of [WiP] Enslavement; Human Farming: Our Enslavement; PETA: Sunny Acre Farms; ELS Ref] government is effectively abolished.
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Mar: EoP Re NZ Police Req to Kiwifarms re 15 Mar Christchurch Mosque attack.

EoP/OKC TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529

.