25 Feb: McVeigh2020 Re: Bernie Sanders: VT Freeman 1972 Essay on Man and Woman Rape

* Bernie Sanders 2020, Nina Turner, Bernard Sanders I-VT, Ogi Ogas, Young Conservatives, NY District Attorney, Cyrus Vance, Emily Tuttle, Joan Vollero, Elizabeth Krasnow, Harvey Weinstein, Damon Cheronis, Arthur Aidala, Diana Fabi-Samson, Barry Kamins, Rose McGowan, Ronan Farrow, Me Too Movement, Tarana Burke, Women’s March, Linda Sarsour, Nanine McCool, Mona Eltahawy, Women’s March Alliance, League of Women Voters, Transition Network, Christine Blasey Ford, Katz Marshall Banks, Debra Katz, Kelly Dolphin, TSD Communications, Ricki Seidman, Bromwich Group, Michael Bromwich, Melissa Schwartz, Anna-Maria Archila, Center for Popular Democracy, Maria Gallagher, Make the Road Action, Lift Our Voices, Gretchen Carlson, Rudy Bakhtiar, Intnl Campaign for Human Righs in Iran, Fox News, Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison, Brad Karp, Justin Lerer, Me Too Movement and the Law, National Womens Law Center, Fatima Goss Graves, Halim Rizk, Maria Patrick, Olympia Feil, Texas A&M University, Sahar F. Aziz, Institute for Womens Policy Research, Ariane Hegewisch, Lisa Bloom, Wendy Walsh, Columbia Law, Suzanne Goldberg, NYCCHR, Christelle Onwu, CNN, Irin Carmon, Womens March, Sophie Ellman-Golan, CA Goldberg PLLC, Carrie Goldberg, Brooklyn College, Michelle Anderson, Public Justice, Paul Bland, National Partnership for Women and Families, Alex Baptiste, Alexandra Nseir, Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP, Julie Fink, Community Legal Services, Nadia Hewka
* 25 Feb: McVeigh2020 Re: Bernie Sanders: VT Freeman 1972 Essay on Man and Woman Rape.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: McVeigh2020EoP v US Senate, EoP v US Peace Rep, EoP v US Political Parties, EoP v Black Lives Matter, EoP v Alt Right, EoP US DoJ, EoP v Me Too Mvmnt, US v Harvey Weinstein, EoP v Rose McGowan, EoP v Christine B Ford / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: McVeigh 2020 Exp Comm <mcveigh2020@tygae.org.za>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:48:17 +0200
Subject: Re: Bernie Sanders: Vermont Freeman 1972 Essay on Man and Woman Rape
To: Bernie Sanders 2020 <info@berniesanders.com>, Nina Turner <info@ninaturner.org>, “Bernard Sanders I-VT: Lori Kearns” <lori_kearns@sanders.senate.gov>, Jacob Gillison <Jacob_Gillison@sanders.senate.gov>, Caryn Compton <Caryn_Compton@sanders.senate.gov>, Michaeleen Crowell <MichaeleenCrowell@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <40fee7118e76935d0aab3fefda6de5e2@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: mcveigh2020@tygae.org.za
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:50:26 +0200
Subject: Re: Bernie Sanders: Vermont Freeman 1972 Essay on Man and Woman Rape
To: Ogi Ogas <ogi.ogas@gmail.com>, Howard Yoon <howard@rossyoon.com>, Young Conservatives <info@youngcons.com>
Message-ID: <225c84565256c63ed876815c4c4c2bac@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: mcveigh2020@tygae.org.za
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:51:28 +0200
Subject: Re: Bernie Sanders: Vermont Freeman 1972 Essay on Man and Woman Rape
To: “US v Harvey Weinstein: US: Cyrus Vance” <vancec@dany.nyc.gov>, Emily Tuttle <tuttlee@dany.nyc.gov>, Joan Vollero <volleroj@dany.nyc.gov>, Elizabeth Krasnow <krasnowe@dany.nyc.gov>, “Harvey Weinstein: Counsel: Damon Cheronis” <mdc@cheronislaw.com>, Arthur Aidala & Diana Fabi-Samson <info@aidalalaw.com>, Barry Kamins <barry.kamins@brooklaw.edu>
Message-ID: <817a01759ca86b4b2f3ddd304960322d@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: mcveigh2020@tygae.org.za
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:54:33 +0200
Subject: Re: Bernie Sanders: Vermont Freeman 1972 Essay on Man and Woman Rape
To: Rose McGowan <postmaster@rosemcgowan.com>, Ronan Farrow <ronan_farrow@newyorker.com>, “Me Too Movement: Tarana Burke” <metooMVMT@gmail.com>, Press <press@metooMVMT.org>, Womens March <info@womensmarch.com>, Linda Sarsour <sarsour.speaks@gmail.com>, Nanine McCool <am@ateeya.com>, Mona Eltahawy <info@monaeltahawy.com>, Womens March Alliance <info@womensmarchalliance.org>, Katherine Siemionko <katherine@womensmarchalliance.org>, Press <press@womensmarchalliance.org>, Vote <vote@womensmarchalliance.org>, Marti Madory <marti67138@gmail.com>, League of Women Voters <office@lwvnyc.org>, Adirondack Womens March <weber@sandraweber.com>, “Transition Network: Peggy Bartolotta” <phb917@gmail.com>, Eve Bogan <ebogan36@gmail.com>, Gail Glover <gailglover@comcast.net>, Rhoda Margolis <rhodamargolis@gmail.com>, Pam Brownstein <pamela.brownstein1@gmail.com>, Ann Freedman <genep00ls@aol.com>,  “Christine Blasey Ford: Counsel: Katz Marshall Banks: Debra Katz” <katz@kmblegal.com>, Kelly Dolphin <dolphin@kmblegal.com>, “TSD Communications: Ricki Seidman” <rseidman@tsd.biz>, “Bromwich Group: Michael Bromwich & Melissa Schwartz” <info@bromwichgroup.com>, Anna-Maria Archila via Center for Popular Democracy <cpd@populardemocracy.org>, Benjamin Linsley <blinsley@populardemocracy.org>, “Maria Gallagher via Make the Road Action: Sara Cullinane” <scullinane@maketheroadaction.org>, Daniel Altschuler <daltschuler@maketheroadaction.org>
Message-ID: <7b4370ecee7881a271dee6c5601bba81@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: mcveigh2020@tygae.org.za
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:55:13 +0200
Subject: Re: Bernie Sanders: Vermont Freeman 1972 Essay on Man and Woman Rape
To: “Lift Our Voices: Gretchen Carlson” <info@liftourvoices.com>, “Rudy Bakhtiar Dir of Comm: Intnl Campaign for Human Righs in Iran” <info@iranhumanrights.org>, “Fox News: Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison: Brad Karp” <bkarp@paulweiss.com>, Justin Lerer <jlerer@paulweiss.com>
Message-ID: <31585076d34afc1b5805ca68c900b369@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: mcveigh2020@tygae.org.za
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:57:33 +0200
Subject: Re: Bernie Sanders: Vermont Freeman 1972 Essay on Man and Woman Rape
To: “National Womens Law Center: National Womens Law Center Olympia Feil” <ofeil@nwlc.org>, Maria Patrick <mpatrick@nwlc.org>, “Fatima Goss Graves: Halim Rizk” <hrizk@nwlc.org>, Maria Patrick <mpatrick@nwlc.org>, Olympia Feil <ofeil@nwlc.org>, “Texas A&M University: Sahar F. Aziz” <sahar.aziz@law.rutgers.edu>, “Institute for Womens Policy Research: Ariane Hegewisch” <hegewisch@iwpr.org>, “Lisa Bloom: Counsel Wendy Walsh” <marcelino@thebloomfirm.com>, “Columbia Law: Suzanne Goldberg” <dglickel@law.columbia.edu>, NYCCHR Christelle Onwu <usa@humanityinaction.org>, “CNN: Irin Carmon” <irin.carmon@nymag.com>, “Womens March: Sophie Ellman-Golan” <press@womensmarch.com>, “CA Goldberg PLLC: Carrie Goldberg” <info@cagoldberglaw.com>, “Brooklyn College: Michelle Anderson” <bcpresident@brooklyn.cuny.edu>, “Public Justice: Paul Bland” <pbland@publicjustice.net>, National Partnership for Women and Families <info@nationalpartnership.org>, “Alex Baptiste: Alexandra Nseir” <anseir@nationalpartnership.org>, “Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP: Julie Fink” <jfink@kaplanhecker.com>, “Community Legal Services: Nadia Hewka” <nhewka@clsphila.org>
Message-ID: <41c89d27ea5f8b227f4a962a2ff0b946@tygae.org.za>
X-Sender: mcveigh2020@tygae.org.za

.

TO: Bernie Sanders
CC: Ogi Ogas, Young Conservatives,
CC: US v Harvey Weinstein
CC: Lift Our Voices: Gretchen Carlson, Fox News: Paul Weiss, Me Too Movement
NPR: The Bernie Sanders ‘Rape Fantasy’ Essay, Explained; NY Times: Bernie Sanders, the Teflon Candidate, Faces Sudden New Tests.

Bernie Sanders et al:

Re: Bernie Sanders: Vermont Freeman 1972 Essay on Man and Woman Rape.

In 1972, the alternative newspaper Vermont Freeman published an essay by Bernie Sanders entitled “Man — and Woman” in which the future U.S. senator included a reference to a woman fantasizing about rape. After Sanders gained political prominence as a presidential candidate in 2015, that essay was brought to wider attention in a profile of Sanders published by Mother Jones on 26 May 2015: What Sanders did share with the young radicals and hippies flocking to Vermont was a smoldering idealism forged during his college years as a civil rights activist — he coordinated a sit-in against segregated housing and attended the 1963 March on Washington — but only a fuzzy sense of how to act on it. Sanders bounced back and forth between Vermont and New York City, where he worked at a psychiatric hospital. After his marriage broke up in the late 1960s, he moved to an A-frame farmhouse outside the Vermont town of Stannard, a tiny hamlet with no paved roads in the buckle of the commune belt. He dabbled in carpentry and tried to get by as a freelance journalist for alternative newspapers and regional publications, contributing interviews, political screeds, and, one time, a stream-of-consciousness essay on the nature of male-female sexual dynamics. – Snopes: Bernie Sanders 1972 Essay on Rape.

I am not proud to be an American. I think anyone who is proud to be an American is an idiot ……… Psychologist Brad Blanton says he doesn’t believe sex talk in the workplace counts as sexual harassment — it’s tight-assed society’s fault if people can’t handle the truth. …. I think Blanton devised Radical Honesty partly as a way to pick up women. It’s a brilliant strategy. The antithesis of mind games. Transparent mating. And according to Blanton, it’s effective. He tells me about a woman he once met on a Paris subway and asked out for tea. When they sat down, he said, “I didn’t really want any tea; I was just trying to figure out a way to delay you so I could talk to you for a while, because I want to go to bed with you.” They went to bed together. Or another seduction technique of his: “Wanna fuck?” “That works?” I asked. “Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t, but it’s the creation of possibility.” – SHO: And Nothing but the Truth: Brad Blanton; Esquire: I Think You’re Fat [SQ Copy]; The Most Honest Conversation in the World [SQ Copy]; Radical Honesty Channel: The Importance of Telling the Radical Truth. [EoP RH FR: Caveat].

Lets Talk About Sex: Hello. I’m Professor Kinsey from Indiana University and I’m making a study of sex behavior. Can I ask you a few questions? I’ve heard about you. You’re the sex doctor, right? I guess I am. If you’d be kind enough to talk to me, it would be of great help to science. I’ve learned that the gap between what we assume people do sexually and what they actually do is enormous. Why are some cows highly sexed while others just stand there? Why do some men need orgasms a week and others almost none? Because everyone is different. The problem is, most people want to be the same. They find it easier to simply ignore this fundamental aspect of the human condition. They’re so eager to be part of the group that they’ll betray their own nature to get there. As you can see, this piece of paper has been divided into squares. There are 287 of them. Your sex history will fit on this single page in a cryptic code. Don’t forget to mention that there’s no written key to the code. …  The Kinsey Reports are two books on human male and female sexual behavior, may be considered as some of the most successful and influential scientific books of the 20th century. They were also associated with a change in the public perception of sexuality. In the 1960s, following the introduction of the first oral contraceptive, this change was to be expressed in the sexual revolution. Additionally, in 1966 Masters and Johnson would publish the first of two texts cataloguing their investigations into the physiology of sex, breaking taboos and misapprehensions similar to those Kinsey had confronted more than a decade earlier in a closely related field. …. The RAF / Baader Meinhof used to say that sexual liberation is part of the anti-imperialist struggle. – SHO: And Nothing but the Truth: Brad Blanton; Kinsey: Trailer; Wikipedia: Kinsey Reports; Baader Meinhof Complex: Trailer: Fucking and Shooting are the same: Sexual Liberation is part of anti-imperialist struggle

* Excerpts: Babylon WiP Academia Research on Wo/men’s Rape Fantasies.
* McVeigh 2020 – Informed Consent Rape, Sharia, Cannibalism, etc – Conclusion
* EoP SciCult Law: Fully Informed Consent Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands

Excerpts: Babylon WiP Academia Research on Wo/men’s Rape Fantasies:

WHAT REALLY TURNS PEOPLE ON? Men and women haven’t been honest—with themselves or each other. What they say they like is often quite different from what they look for when nobody is watching. But how can we learn the truth? Two bold young neuroscientists have initiated a revolution in the scientific study of sexual attraction. Before Ogi Ogas and Sai Gaddam, the only researcher to systematically investigate sexual desires was Alfred Kinsey, who surveyed 18,000 middle-class Caucasians in the 1950s. But Ogas and Gaddam have studied the secret sexual behavior of more than a hundred million men and women around the world. Their method?  They observed what people do within the anonymity of the Internet. – A Billion Wicked Thoughts.

So the short answer is that there are as many manifestations of the dominance and submission cues in both men and women as there are variations of desserts. However, we’ll go a little further than most scientists. The usual position of academic researchers is that female coercion fantasies involve handsome, attractive strangers who aggressively seduce women in a non-violent way, rather than rape them. Some women certainly have these fantasies. But you don’t have to look far on the Internet to find much darker and more violent female fantasies, involving ugly truckers, brutal sex, gang rape, even mutilation. In the Harry Potter fan fiction I read, Draco in particular always seemed to be raping girls. Tracie Egan, who we used in our epigraph, narrates how she paid a male gigalo to enact a forceful rape. During our research, we also encountered women who said they enjoyed role-playing rape—not aggressive seduction. So far, academic politics have prevented sexologists from taking an honest look at the true variety of women’s fantasies. – Psychology Today: Do Men Want to Rape? Do Women Want to Be Raped?, by Ogi Ogas, Ph.D., and Sai Gaddam, Ph.D.

EoP Caveat Re: Babylon WiP Academic Research [23 Feb: EoP Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report]:

“Science is built like a building,” John Arnold says. “One floor on top of the next.” In nutrition, “the whole foundation of the research had been flawed. All these things that we thought we knew—when we step back and look at the evidence base—it’s just not there.” Arnold says that now, unless he trusts a researcher’s work, he no longer believes the findings of any scientific study until he or someone on the staff carefully vets the paper. “A new study shows …” are “the four most dangerous words,” Arnold wrote on Twitter. Together with Taubes’ work, Arnold was also reading Ioannidis’ and Gold­acre’s equally devastating analyses. These critiques of science amounted to a deep philosophical quandary for the Arnolds, philanthropists who had dedicated their lives to a data-based approach to giving. “In everything they do, they want to be evidence-driven,” says Stuart Buck, vice president of research integrity at the Arnold Foundation. But if you look at the studies that can’t be reproduced and other issues facing science, “you start to think: What is evidence? What do we actually know?” – Wired: John Arnold Made a Fortune at Enron. Now he’s declared a war on bad science.
» EoP Leg Sub: 28 Jun: EoP Re: John Arnold’s Doing Good Giving Pledge War on Bad [WiP?] Science; 23 Feb: EoP Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report.

EoP SciCult Law: Steppe Aryan: No Rape, Murder, Prisons, Unemployment etc:

McVeigh 2020: Gimbutas noted the stable – no population & economic consumption growth – Steppe Aryan population: that a low tech agrarian village founded in 8000 BC was still a low tech agrarian village in 4000BC. This also allowed them to sustainably farm the land, and live in peace. There are no steppe Aryan palaces, no prisons, no mental institutions, no homeless, no landless and no unemployed. No harems; they didnt even have marriage, just as the Musou still today. Among whom, rape & murder are so rare they dont have words for it. – SQSwans: Day Brown: Proto Indo-European: 23 January 2017.
» McVeigh 2020: Return to Eden: EoP – End Civ – UN Resolution.

McVeigh 2020 – Women Rape Fantasy Research – Conclusion:

Its possible that there are a few, a significant minority or even a majority of wo/men who may consciously or unconsciously fantasize about being raped. If so: Its also possible that – rape being an abstract concept [SQ-G2G: John Friedlander: Abstract, Concrete, General and Specific Terms] – they can have very many different personal experiential descriptions of what they describe as their ‘rape fantasy’.

For example: None of the Me Too Movement [eop-v-mtm] women who profess to oppose violations of informed consent sexual relations, invited to cooperate to implement EoP SciCult – Steppe Aryan: No Rape, Murder, Pirsons, Unemployment etc – law as international law; have indicated any interest in a global social contract that will sentence individuals found guilty of intentional violation of informed consent deception – whether rape predators and/or fake rape victims – to death.

As a former sex worker, my sexual preferences are pretty village idiot simple and my arousal comes from my physical senses as opposed to ego mindfuck stuff. My interpretation of domination / submission rape sexual fantasy stuff is that its arousal that is generated from ego mindfuck-deception games issues.

My response to clients who wanted such stuff was not moral judgement, particularly since they were engaged in finding fully informed consenting partner for their domination / submission rape fantasy sexual deception mindfuck games; but that ‘that was not my kind of sexual services fun’.

That’s not my kind of fun …. It takes a 14 shot clip. Are you expecting an army? No, just a division. …… Be Fruitful and Multiply; Now Divide …… When consciousness focussed on WiP resource thieving revenge does not see EoP intnl law problem solving justice bridge path. – Serpico 1973: Trailer; Serpico 2017: Trailer; NY Times: Watching Serpico with Serpico; IG: 16-07-11_Be Fruitful, Now Divide; Evolved Atheist: Dennett: Consciousness Explained; Syriana: Trailer: Corruption: Seagal Ending.

McVeigh 2020 advice to any person with a non-mainstream cultural preference, fantasy, etc; which are condemned by three monkeys – individuals who are very very fucking clueless about active listening and radical honesty[§] about preferences fully informed consent relating values practices; presumably as a result of their lack of ego/eco  literacy [PDF: ego-eco-literacy] character – passive aggressive, two faced hypocrite society; is to (a) explore those practices in an environment that has strict fully informed consent rules, that protect all participating individuals; and (b) cooperate to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law; enabling more honest and fully informed consenting relating for all.

If, however by ‘fuck’ you mean actively listen [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle: 9 min] and sincerely resolve any objective and/or subjective issue in dispute; then I am open to fucking. So, do you want to – listen and sincerely resolve any objective and/or subjective issue in dispute – fuck? Are any of your ego-penussy’s capable of active listening hardons?
» EoP Leg Sub: 23 Jan: LJ Upd: EoP Req for – BB-Affid Status; RH Circle Fuckery Complaint – Info.

[§] Esquire: I Think You’re Fat [SQ Copy]; The Most Honest Conversation in the World [SQ Copy]; SHO: And Nothing but the Truth: Brad Blanton; Radical Honesty Channel: Radical Honesty: 01:02:03; The Importance of Telling the Radical Truth. [EoP RH FR: Caveat].

EoP SciCult Law: Fully Informed Consent Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands:

Under EoP Scientific & Cultural [PDF: eop-scicultlaw] international law:

Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands [PDF: cult-law-self-rule] will be allowed to ban immigrants from including their property ration [PDF: property-ration] in a particular – racial, sexual preferences, gender, cultural, ideological, etc – cultural law self rule homeland; if such immigrant does not share the – KKK goosestepping, or cannibal sex [Barcroft TV: Interview with a Cannibal], or Sharia Law, or BDSM, etc – Cultural Law Self Rule homelands racial, religious, gender or cultural laws.

All Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands will be required to punish conscious intentional violations of fully informed consent, as deception crimes of aggression [PDF: crimes-of-aggression].

[1]  Cultural law refers to any racial, religious, ideological, sexual or gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any EoP Scientific [eop-scicultlaw ] – procreation and/or consumption below ecological carrying capacity [eop-footprint ] – laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals.
[2]  Individuals Rights and Duties under Cultural Law include: Cultural Law Territorial Self Rule for Groups with Subjective Racial, Religious& Gender Culture-Conflict Identities.
[3]  Violations of Cultural Law would fall under Deception Crimes of Aggression: Violations of Fully Informed Consent.
[4]  Conflict of Cultural Law Violations: Violations of Cultural Law between two individuals or groups of individuals with different Cultural Laws, would be adjudicated in terms of Crimes of Aggression [crimes-of-aggression ]: Violations of Fully Informed Consent.

Cultural Law Territorial Self Rule for Groups with Subjective Racial, Religious & Gender Culture-Conflict Identities:
[5]  Any group of individuals who have signed their Responsible Freedom Oaths to abide by Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law who share similar racial, religious, socio-ideological, sexual or gender identity, may agree to form a Cultural Law Self Rule community homeland, which can be as small as an agreement between two people, a family or village within a nation; or as large as a continental territory including a few nations; where the individuals within that territory have provided their fully informed consent to practicing a particular group shared ‘Cultural Law’.
[6]  As long as the particular ‘cultural law’ is based on the fully informed consent of all individuals within the particular ‘cultural law’ homeland community; and the ‘cultural law’ is practiced within the confines of the particular cultural law homeland community’s territory; it is lawful; irrespective of how offensive it may be to the cultural values of a neighbouring homeland with different racial, religious, class, gender groups cultural law agreement values.
[7]  Any groups cultural law is lawful within that cultural law homeland community’s territory; and cannot be legally restricted or punished by a different group of individuals who have different subjective racial, religious or gender cultural laws, within their cultural law homeland territory.
[8]  There is no restriction whatsoever on the choice of any groups fully informed consenting ‘cultural law’; as long as it (a) does not violate EoP Scientific procreation and consumption laws; and (b) is based upon fully informed consent of all individuals within the privacy territory of the individuals ‘self rule cultural law homeland’. For example: Armin Meiwes and Bernd Brandes fully informed consent cannibalism, etc.

Cultural Law Homeland Rights and Duties:
[9]  Cultural law homeland rights will only apply to individuals or groups of individuals objectively and subjectively abiding by EoP Scientific laws:
[10] If or where a homeland agrees on a cultural law that restricts travel across their property ration homeland to individuals who are not members of their cultural law homeland agreement; they should clearly and simply notify neighbour property ration territories, and include a ‘Whites / Blacks / Sharia Muslims / Jews Only Homeland’ public notice at roads entering their homeland; where clear and simple definitions of ‘whites, blacks, sharia muslims, jews’ are provided.
[11] Ultimately as property swaps enable individuals with similar ‘cultural law homeland’ values to find property rations on the outskirts of existing homelands; enabling them to join a particular homeland, different homelands can create nature corridors between their homelands to protect their cultural values and minimize relating friction with homeland neighbours who have conflicting racial, religious, gender etc cultural law values.
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 May: LJ v LS Court Filing: NoM Afd & EoP UN Res [PDF]: EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [PDF]; EoP Footprint [PDF]; Ego Literacy [PDF]; Crime of Aggression [PDF]; Property Ration [PDF]; Land Reform [PDF]; Cultural Law Self Rule [PDF].

McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020] EoP/OKC TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529

.