08 May: Covid 19: Hoax, Experiment, Nature, Accident or Intentional?

* 08 May: Covid 19: Hoax, Experiment, Nature, Accident or Intentional?.
» Last Updated: 10 May 2020: 13:53 hrs + 0200.
» 17 Mar: McV20: EoP Re: Covid19: Hoax, Nature, 5G Accident or Biowarfare Intentional?
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v TGP Oligarchs, EoP v Patrice Motsepe, EoP v AWS, EoP v Mil Industrial Complex / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

EoP Law [EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF] Re: Covid 19 Lockdown:
» 04 May: McVeigh2020: WHO Covid-19 Lockdown & Tobacco Ban illegal under EoP Law;
EoP Law Lockdown Compromise:
» EoP Law: 30 Mar: McVeigh2020: EoP Law Covid-19 Lockdown Rules Recommendations.
» WiP Law: 2 May: McVeigh2020: EoP or WiP Law SA Courts Q for SAPS Police Chief Cele [password].

.

EoP Obs: Covid 19: Hoax, Experiment, Nature, Accident or Intentional?:

* Negligent Hoax:
* Covid Testing: Negligent / Intentional: In / Accuracy:
* Intentional 5G Vaccines PharmaCorp Philanthropy Dictatorship Hoax
* Nature: Totalitarian Agriculture Ecological Overshoot Civilization:
* 5G Immune Suppression Accident:
* Psychotronic HAARP Electromagnetic Biowarfare Experiment:
* Accidental Vaccine Gain of Function Biowarfare:
* Intentional Biowarfare:
* Psychotronic – Abel v Kane Covid-19 Cold War – Pandemic:
* Conclusion.

.

Negligent Hoax:

People should ask themselves whether this coronavirus “pandemic” could be a big hoax, with the actual danger of the disease massively exaggerated by those who seek to profit – financially or politically – from the ensuing panic. That is not to say the disease is harmless. Without question people will die from coronavirus. Those in vulnerable categories should take precautions to limit their risk of exposure. But we have seen this movie before. Government over-hypes a threat as an excuse to grab more of our freedoms. When the “threat” is over, however, they never give us our freedoms back. – Ron Paul Inst: The Coronavirus Hoax.

There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus:
I work in the healthcare field. Here’s the problem, we are testing people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19. There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus. There are no reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus cases. This needs to be addressed first and foremost. Every action and reaction to COVID-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply cannot make accurate assessments. This is why you’re hearing that most people with COVID-19 are showing nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. That’s because most Coronavirus strains are nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. The few actual novel Coronavirus cases do have some worse respiratory responses, but still have a very promising recovery rate, especially for those without prior issues. The ‘gold standard’ in testing for COVID-19 is laboratory isolated/purified coronavirus particles free from any contaminants and particles that look like viruses but are not, that have been proven to be the cause of the syndrome known as COVID-19 and obtained by using proper viral isolation methods and controls (not the PCR that is currently being used or Serology /antibody tests which do not detect virus as such). PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome. The problem is the test is known not to work. It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery. Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues. The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense. And that’s not even getting into the other issue – viral load. If you remember the PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA. It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that’s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if a osteogenesis is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you. If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis. And coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen. Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus. They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive PCR test for covi even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common. There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time. All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location – say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease. Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die. You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on. Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist. Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically. Your only problem is going to be that – due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people, you are mislabeling your case numbers, and especially your deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic. But you can stop people pointing this out in several ways. [1]. You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead. [2]. You can tell people that ‘minimizing’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers. [3] You can talk crap about made up numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience. [4] You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptom-less cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen. Take these 4 simple steps and you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks. They cannot “confirm” something for which there is no accurate test. – The Dreamheron Chronicles: Coronavirus: Guest Commentary; via David Icke.
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Mar: McVeigh2020: EoP Law Covid-19 Lockdown Rules Recommendations.

Lukashenko: Better to die standing than live on your IMF debt slave knees: What will be Weimar herd culling result of Covid Lockdowns Economic Collapse $20 Trillion inflation?: Europe’s last dictator least eager to make his country easy corona cattle slaughter pickings for IMF/UN servitude. Alexander Lukashenko: Its better to die standing than to live on your knees. The opposition has accused Lukashenka of deliberately helping the virus spread. Mikalay Statkevich: I understand that, for this person, old people are a worthless burden who need to be paid pensions. But for us, these are our parents, grandfathers, and grandmothers. These are people who are close to us, whom we must take care of, if we are people, not livestock. ….Lukashenko: People are ranting about quarantines, curfews and so on. Listen, its easy to do, we can do it overnight, but what are we going to eat?  …… Alexander Lukashenko: I once asked the question: is this pandemic, this coronavirus, a man-made phenomenon? I don’t know the answer yet, but I have my suspicions. Are politicians and others using this situation for their own purposes? You and I both know the answer to that question. You already see how it is used today…Doesn’t it seem to you that the powerful forces of the world would like to remake the world, without a ‘war’ (Emmanuel Macron has already called it a war), through this so-called ‘corona-psychosis’, or ‘info-demic’? Many people are asking: ‘what will happen after the pandemic?’” Lukashenko said, speaking to Mir TV in an interview airing Friday. Lukashenko has insisted that Belarus’s economy continue to operate as normal, even if this means risks to his political popularity, saying he could imagine what would happen to the country after the pandemic is over if it were to shut down. My friend [UN Secretary-General] Antonio Guterres, a sincere man, has proposed printing money worth ten percent of global GDP. Even as things are the dollar is gradually losing its value, and here it will just drop, giving rise to inflation. Where we will come out of this with our [Belarusian] ruble we know,” the president explained. “Moreover, who will receive these $20 trillion? Where will this money end up? Will it not be a case of the rich getting richer, while the poor get poorer? I think it will. We’ve been pushed to shut down and sit and eat through the small reserves we have. Even in Russia it cannot be said that its currency reserves are so large,” Lukashenko said. “And then, having printed out this 10 percent of global GDP, those who stay on their feet will come to us and say ‘here is a little for you, but now you will do what we say’. That’s how the world can be reshaped,” he warned. – – Ruptly: Lukashenko: Its better to die standing than to live on your knees. Lukashenko plays hockey amid Covid19; RFERL: Belarus Lives It Up As Neighbors Lock Down Over COVID-19; Lukashenka Disparages COVID-19 Victims As Belarus Curve Steepens; Sputnik: Belarus’s President Warns Global Elites Using COVID-19 Crisis to Try to Reshape World Order;
» EoP Leg Sub: 15 Apr: EoP Re: RFERL: Lukashenko v Statkevich; 08 Apr: McVeigh 2020: EoP Re Lukashenko Weimar Herd Culling Q re Gates WHO Covid-19 Lockdown.

How to Make Do It Yourself Corona Hoax Cattle Ear Tags: How to Make Do It Yourself Ear Tags: All you need is some cardboard – ideally a bright color, like yellow or pink – a pair of scissors and a black sharpie magic marker. Cut out the pattern – see the pics – and then number. I added “Corona” and “Cattle” to mine, to make the point as obvious as possible.  Then cut a little slit through the tab, through which you slide one of those bendy tabs that come with bags of coffee grounds. Use that to press-fit to your ear (better than actually punching a hole through your ear). Now you’re officially part of the herd – of sanity. And taking a very visible stand against insanity – against Sickness Psychosis – against being forced to play along with the mentally ill, for the sake of their shattered minds – at the expense of your life. If enough of us moooo! at this absurdity, it will end. Because absurdity only has power when it is taken seriously. There is tangible good news to report. The cattle are beginning to kick the chute! As EPautos readers know already, I’ve been sporting a homemade ear tag for the past several weeks, to make the point that Americans are being conditioned to accept being treated like feed lot cows. Literally herded – and prodded. And soon, force-vaccinated and electronically tagged – to prove they have been vaccinated. Might as well wear an actual cattle tag. Seeing it might get the prospective cattle thinking, too – and not liking the prospect of being electronically tagged. This might prevent us all from being forcibly tagged. – Straight Line Logic: The Herd Grows by Eric Peters.
» EoP Leg Sub: 26 Apr: LJ v TRC Q Re: EFF v Mugg & Bean: What is EFF definition of racism?.

.

Covid Testing: Negligent / Intentional: In / Accuracy:

“The accuracy of the current COVID-19 tests is not precisely known. Reasonable estimates, based on test performance in China and the performance of the influenza tests, are that the tests will correctly identify around 60 percent of the patients with the disease and correctly identify 90 percent of the patients that are disease-free. Assume that the physician thinks there is a 50 percent of the patient having COVID-19. Given the above numbers, if the patient has the disease, the test will be positive 85 percent of the time. Fifteen percent of the infected patients will incorrectly be diagnosed as not having the disease. If the patient does not have the disease, only 70 percent of the patients will have a negative test. It would take four consecutive negative tests to conclusively prove the patient did not have the disease.“ – Kevin Pho: The accuracy of COVID-19 tests.
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Mar: McVeigh2020: EoP Law Covid-19 Lockdown Rules Recommendations.

A spate of mysterious second-time infections is calling into question the accuracy of COVID-19 diagnostic tools even as China prepares to lift quarantine measures to allow residents to leave the epicenter of its outbreak next month. It’s also raising concerns of a possible second wave of cases. But when both were tested a second time for the coronavirus on Sunday, March 22, as a precondition for seeking medical care for unrelated health issues, they tested positive for the coronavirus even though they exhibited none of the typical symptoms, such as a fever or dry cough. The time from their recovery and release to the retest ranged from a few days to a few weeks. It is possible they were first given a false negative test result, which can happen if the swab used to collect samples of the virus misses bits of the virus. Dr. Li Wenliang, a whistleblowing doctor who later died of the virus himself in February, tested negative for the coronavirus several times before being accurately diagnosed. In February, Wang Chen, a director at the state-run Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, estimated that the nucleic acid tests used in China were accurate at identifying positive cases of the coronavirus only 30%-50% of the time. Another theory is that, because the test amplifies tiny bits of DNA, residual virus from the initial infection could have falsely resulted in that second positive reading. “There are false positives with these types of tests,” Dr. Jeffrey Shaman, a professor of environmental health sciences at Columbia University, told NPR by email. Shaman recently co-authored a modeling study showing that transmission by individuals who did not exhibit any symptoms was a driver of the Wuhan outbreak. – NPR: Mystery In Wuhan: Recovered Coronavirus Patients Test Negative … Then Positive.
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Mar: McVeigh2020: EoP Law Covid-19 Lockdown Rules Recommendations.

Tanzania President Magulfi: WHO Covid tests – positive in goat and pawpaw – faulty.
Tanzanian President John Magufuli’s assertions that coronavirus tests in the country are faulty have been rejected by the World Health Organization. The statement comes after Mr Magufuli on Sunday said Tanzania’s COVID-19 test kits had been defective, as they had provided positive results after tests from a goat and a pawpaw fruit had been submitted. Dr John Nkengasong, director of the Africa Centres for Disease Control (CDC), said Tanzania was using test kits supplied by the Africa CDC in collaboration with the Chinese Jack Ma Foundation, which met international standards. “Tanzania is using the same test that everyone is using,” Dr Nkengasong said, noting that it was improbable the tests were faulty. The World Health Organization has rejected claims by Tanzanian President John Magufuli that coronavirus tests in his country have been faulty. “We are convinced that the tests… are not contaminated with the virus,” WHO Africa director Matshidiso Moeti said in a media briefing. “We are not in agreement with (Magufuli’s) point of view,” Dr Moeti added. – SBS News: Tanzania says ‘faulty’ WHO test kits showed coronavirus in a goat and a pawpaw.

Michael Osterholm: Point of Impact: An Inaccurate Covid Test is worse than No Test.
Today everyone is so convinced about getting tests, that they miss the point that a bad test is worse than no test. The FDA basically has created a wild wild west environment for this Covid testing where on their approval process they have let tests on the market that basically have a very very wide range of results. The quality of these tests right now vary a great deal and that is a challenge in terms of understanding, if you get a negative result, is it really negative?. – CNN: Trump questions ‘whole concept of tests.’ See Gupta’s reaction.

Dr Cameron Kyle-Sidell: COVID-19 not a lung disease; give oxygen not ventilator:
Dr Cameron Kyle-Sidell: COVID-19 lung disease, as far as I can see, is not a pneumonia and should not be treated as one. Rather, it appears as if some kind of viral-induced disease most resembling high altitude sickness. Is it as if tens of thousands of my fellow New Yorkers are on a plane at 30,000 feet at the cabin pressure is slowly being let out. These patients are slowly being starved of oxygen. And while [patients] absolutely look like patients on the brink of death, they do not look like patients dying from pneumonia… I suspect that the patients I’m seeing in front of me, look as if a person was dropped off on the top of Mt. Everest without time to acclimate. In other words, the real disease appears to cause oxygen deprivation in victims, not pneumonia. This is critically important for all the obvious reasons, and it raises huge questions about the origins of the coronavirus and whether there is some additional external factor beyond the virus that may be causing a combined effect that results in severe oxygen deprivation. – Natural News: Bombshell plea from NYC ICU doctor: COVID-19 is a condition of oxygen deprivation, not pneumonia… VENTILATORS may be causing the lung damage, not the virus.
» EoP Leg Sub: 05 Apr: Sullnikov Crossing: EoP Law Covid-19 Lockdown Rules Recommendations.

.

Intentional 5G Vaccines PharmaCorp Philanthropy Dictatorship Hoax

Machinery and Medicine and Happiness: What happens if you want to Leave? …… General Robert Spalding: In a 5G World you cannot opt out. – Brave New World: Trailer; Milgram Experiment: Experimenter; Valuetainment: The Threat of 5G, via Activist Post: Congress Threatens to Reverse Military Opposed FCC 5G Ruling; The Hill: Pentagon official: FCC decision on 5G threatens GPS, national security, via Cryptogon.
» EoP Leg Sub: 02 May: McV20: EoP Law Re: WHO: SE Responsible Covid Model; RSpalding: Threat of 5G.

Bill Gates: I can’t sell IMF debt slave vaccines to countries with Covid-19 herd immunity:
Rosemary Frei: Then a few seconds later, at 33:45, Gates drops another bomb: “We don’t want to have a lot of recovered people […] To be clear, we’re trying – through the shut-down in the United States – to not get to one percent of the population infected. We’re well below that today, but with exponentiation, you could get past that three million [people or approximately one percent of the U.S. population being infected with COVID-19 and the vast majority recovering]. I believe we will be able to avoid that with having this economic pain.” It appears that rather than let the population be exposed to the virus and most develop antibodies that give them natural, long-lasting immunity to COVID-19, Gates and his colleagues far prefer to create a vast, hugely expensive, new system of manufacturing and selling billions of test kits, and in parallel very quickly developing and selling billions of antivirals and vaccines. And then, when the virus comes back again a few months later and most of the population is unexposed and therefore vulnerable, selling billions more test kits and medical interventions. Vaccines are very big business: this Feb. 23 CNBC article, for example, describes the vaccine market as six times bigger than it was 20 years ago, at more than $35 billion annually today, and providing a $44 return for every $1 invested in the world’s 94 lowest-income countries [eNCA: SA seeks IMF loan to fight Covid-19]. Notably, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation – which has an endowment of $52 billion – has given more than $2.4 billion to the World Health Organization (WHO) since 2000. The Politico article quotes a Geneva-based NGO representative as saying Gates is “treated liked a head of state, not only at the WHO, but also at the G20,”and that Gates is one of the most influential people in global health. Meanwhile, officials around the world are doing their part to make sure everyone social distances, self-isolates and/or stays locked down. Gates very likely knows that there is little if any reason to worry about being in close contact with other people unless you or they are vulnerable to developing a severe illness from COVID-19. He surely knows, also, that if you contract COVID-19 and you’re otherwise healthy you’ll very likely have few symptoms, if any, and recover quickly. And that this exposure in fact is beneficial because in the process you will develop antibodies to the virus and have natural, long-lasting immunity to it. – Off Guardian: Did Bill Gates Just Reveal the Reason behind the Lock-Downs?; Torontians for Transparency: Where’s the Evidence Supporting the Drastic Measures Against COVID-19?; via Straight Line Logic.
» EoP Leg Sub: 06 Apr: EoP Re: Do you have reason to doubt analysis of Dr Anthony Fauci; 08 Apr: McVeigh 2020: EoP Re Lukashenko Weimar Herd Culling Q re Gates WHO Covid-19 Lockdown..

There’s even the WHO’s own malaria chief, Dr. Arata Kochi, who complained in an internal memo that Gates’ influence meant that the world’s leading malaria scientists are now “locked up in a ‘cartel’ with their own research funding being linked to those of others within the group,” and that the foundation “was stifling debate on the best ways to treat and combat malaria, prioritizing only those methods that relied on new technology or developing new drugs.” Kochi’s complaint, written in 2008, highlights the most common criticism of the global health web that Gates has spun in the past two decades: That the public health industry has become a racket run by and for Big Pharma and its partners for the benefit of big business. At the time that Kochi was writing his memo, the executive director of the Gates Foundation’s Global Health program was Tachi Yamada. Yamada left his position as Chairman of Research and Development at GlaxoSmithKline to take up the position at the Gates Foundation in 2006, and left the foundation five years later to become Chief Medical and Scientific Officer at Takeda Pharmaceuticals. Yamada’s replacement as head of Gates’ Global health program, Trevor Mundel was himself a clinical researcher at Pfizer and Parke-Davis and spent time as head of development with Novartis before joining the foundation. This use of foundation funds to set public policy to drive up corporate profits is not a secret conspiracy. It is a perfectly open one. When the Center for Global Development formed a working group to “develop a practical approach to the vaccine challenge,” they concluded that the best way to incentivize pharmaceutical companies to produce more vaccines for the third world was for governments to promise to buy vaccines before they were even developed. They titled their report “Making Markets for Vaccines.” When the first such “Advanced Market Commitment” was made in 2007—a $1.5 billion promise to buy yet-to-be-produced vaccines from Big Pharma manufacturers—there was the Gates Foundation as the only non-nation sponsor. The Gates-founded Gavi Vaccine Alliance is an open partnership between the Gates Foundation, the World Health Organization, the World Bank and the vaccine manufacturers. Their stated goals includes “introducing new vaccines into the routine schedules of national immunization programmes” and to engage in “market shaping efforts” to ensure “healthy markets for vaccines and other immunization products.” If “introducing new vaccines” and ensuring healthy markets for them was the aim of Gates’ “Decade of Vaccines,” there can be no doubt that COVID-19 has seen that goal realized in spectacular fashion. And there, at the center of this web, is the Gates Foundation, connected to every major organization, research institution, international alliance and vaccine manufacturer involved in the current crisis. Certainly, the Gates—like the Rockefellers—have profited from their years as “the most generous people on the planet.” As curious as it might seem to those who don’t understand the true nature of this monopoly cartel, despite all of these grants and pledges—commitments of tens of billions of dollars—Bill Gates’ personal net worth has actually doubled during this Decade of Vaccines, from $50 billion to over $100 billion. – Corbett Report: How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health; Bill Gates’ Plan to Vaccinate the World.

.

Nature: Totalitarian Agriculture Ecological Overshoot Civilization:

There’s an apocryphal aphorism, often attributed to Rousseau, which states that “Civilization is a hopeless race to discover remedies for the evils it produces”. Every day that passes is a new chance to realize this. Before extensive human travel, migratory birds that nested together combined long-distance travel with crowding to constitute, perhaps, the main vector for the spread of disease over distance. The association of infection with crowding was known and utilized long before the actual vectors of disease transmission were understood. Hunters and gatherers knew enough to stay clear of large settlements, and dispersal was long seen as a way to avoid contracting an epidemic disease. The importance of sedentism and the crowding it allowed can not be overestimated. It means that virtually all infectious diseases due to microorganisms specifically adapted to Homo sapiens came into existence only in the past ten thousand years. Many of them perhaps only in the past five thousand. They were, in the strong sense, a “civilizational effect.” These historically novel diseases—cholera, smallpox, mumps, measles, influenza, chicken pox, and perhaps malaria—arose only as a result of the beginnings of urbanism and, as we shall see, agriculture [TSW: Daniel Quinn: Totalitarian Agriculture]. No account of the epidemiology of the Neolithic is complete without noting the key role of domesticates: livestock, commensals, and cultivated grains and legumes. The key principle of crowding is again operative. The Neolithic was not only an unprecedented gathering of people but, at the same time, a wholly unprecedented gathering of sheep, goats, cattle, pigs, dogs, cats, chickens, ducks, geese. To the degree that they were already “herd” or “flock” animals, they would have carried some species-specific pathogens of crowding. Assembled for the first time around the domus, in close and continuous contact, they quickly came to share a wide range of infective organisms. Estimates vary, but of the fourteen hundred known human pathogenic organisms, between eight hundred and nine hundred are zoonotic diseases, originating in nonhuman hosts. For most of these pathogens, Homo sapiens is a final “dead-end” host: humans do not transmit it further to another nonhuman host. The multispecies resettlement camp was, then, not only a historic assemblage of mammals in numbers and proximity never previously known, but it was also an assembly of all the bacteria, protozoa, helminthes, and viruses that fed on them. The victors, as it were, in this pest race were those pathogens that could quickly adapt to new hosts in the domus and multiply. What was occurring was the first massive surge of pathogens across the species barrier, establishing an entirely new epidemiological order. The narrative of this breach is naturally told from the (horrified) perspective of Homo sapiens. It cannot have been any less melancholy from the perspective of, say, the goat or sheep that, after all, did not volunteer to enter the domus. I leave it to the reader to imagine how a precocious, all-knowing goat might narrate the history of disease transmission in the Neolithic. The list of diseases shared with domesticates and commensals at the domus is quantitatively striking. In an outdated list, now surely even longer, we humans share twenty-six diseases with poultry, thirty-two with rats and mice, thirty-five with horses, forty-two with pigs, forty-six with sheep and goats, fifty with cattle, and sixty-five with our much-studied and oldest domesticate, the dog.  Measles is suspected to have arisen from a rinderpest virus among sheep and goats, smallpox from camel domestication and a cowpox-bearing rodent ancestor, and influenza from the domestication of waterfowl some forty-five hundred years ago. The generation of new species-jumping zoonoses grew as populations of man and beasts swelled and contact over longer distances became more frequent. It continues today. Little wonder, then, that southeast China, specifically Guangdong, probably the largest, most crowded, and historically deepest concentration of Homo sapiens, pigs, chickens, geese, ducks, and wild animal markets in the world, has been a major world petri dish for the incubation of new strains of bird and swine flu. The disease ecology of the late Neolithic was not simply a result of the crowding of people and their domesticates in fixed settlements. It was rather an effect of the entire domus complex as an ecological module. The clearing of the land for agriculture and the grazing of the new domesticates created an entirely new landscape, and an entirely new ecological niche with more sunlight, more exposed soils, into which new suites of flora, fauna, insects, and microorganisms moved as the previous ecological pattern was disturbed.” – Chris Scott: Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States; via Deep Green Resistance: The Real Origins of Coronavirus Explained.

I would say we are the cause of almost all emerging diseases. We’re not doing it on purpose, but it’s our everyday way of going about business on the planet that seems to be driving this. The big things that drive these diseases are places on the planet where there’s lots of wildlife diversity, because they carry viruses, some of which can become pandemics in places where the human population is dense and growing. Because our contact with wildlife is higher, there’s more of a chance for viruses to get to us. It’s the way we bump up against them. I’ve found that things like land use, change, deforestation, road building, mining, and agricultural intensification are the reasons we push ourselves into wildlife habitat and get infected. – Slate: A Warning From a Scientist Who Saw the Coronavirus Coming.

Since 1940, hundreds of microbial pathogens have either emerged or reemerged into new territory where they’ve never been seen before. They include HIV, Ebola in West Africa, Zika in the Americas, and a bevy of novel coronaviruses. The majority of them—60 percent—originate in the bodies of animals. Some come from pets and livestock. Most of them—more than two-thirds—originate in wildlife. But that’s not the fault of wild animals. Although stories illustrated with pictures of wild animals as “the source” of deadly outbreaks might suggest otherwise, wild animals are not especially infested with deadly pathogens, poised to infect us. In fact, most of these microbes live harmlessly in these animals’ bodies. The problem is the way that cutting down forests and expanding towns, cities, and industrial activities creates pathways for animal microbes to adapt to the human body. Habitat destruction threatens vast numbers of wild species with extinction, including the medicinal plants and animals we’ve historically depended upon for our pharmacopeia. It also forces those wild species that hang on to cram into smaller fragments of remaining habitat, increasing the likelihood that they’ll come into repeated, intimate contact with the human settlements expanding into their newly fragmented habitats. It’s this kind of repeated, intimate contact that allows the microbes that live in their bodies to cross over into ours, transforming benign animal microbes into deadly human pathogens. It’s not only the fact of habitat destruction that ratchets up the risk of disease emergence, it’s also what we’re replacing wild habitat with. To sate our species’ carnivorous appetites, we’ve razed an area around the size of the continent of Africa to raise animals for slaughter. Some of these animals are then delivered through the illicit wildlife trade or sold in so-called “wet markets.” There, wild species that would rarely if ever encounter each other in nature are caged next to one another, allowing microbes to jump from one species to the next, a process that begot the coronavirus that caused the 2002–03 SARS epidemic and possibly the novel coronavirus stalking us today. But many more are reared in factory farms, where hundreds of thousands of individuals await slaughter, packed closely together, providing microbes lush opportunities to turn into deadly pathogens. Avian influenza viruses, for example, which originate in the bodies of wild waterfowl, rampage in factory farms packed with captive chickens, mutating and becoming more virulent, a process so reliable it can be replicated in the laboratory. One strain called H5N1, which can infect humans, kills more than half of those infected. Containing another strain, which reached North America in 2014, required the slaughter of tens of millions of poultry. The avalanche of excreta produced by our livestock introduces yet more opportunities for animal microbes to spill over into human populations. Because animal waste is far more voluminous than croplands can possibly absorb as fertilizer, it is collected in many places in unlined cesspools called manure lagoons. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli, which lives harmlessly inside the guts of over half of all cattle on American feedlots, lurks in that waste. In humans, it causes bloody diarrhea and fever and can lead to acute kidney failure. Because cattle waste so frequently sloshes into our food and water, 90,000 Americans are infected every year. This process of transforming animal microbes into human pathogens is accelerated today, but it is not new. It began with the Neolithic revolution, when we first cleared wildlife habitat to make way for crops and yoked wild animals into servitude. The “deadly gifts” we received from our “animal friends,” as Jared Diamond put it, include measles and tuberculosis, from cows; pertussis from pigs; and influenza from ducks. It continued during the era of colonial expansion. Belgian colonists in Congo built the railroads and cities that allowed a lentivirus in local macaques to perfect its adaptations to the human body; British colonists in Bangladesh cut down the Sundarbans wetlands to build rice farms, exposing humans to water-borne bacteria in the wetlands’ brackish waters. The pandemics those colonial-era intrusions created plague us to this day. The macaque’s lentivirus evolved into HIV. The water-borne bacteria of the Sundarbans, now known as cholera, has caused seven pandemics so far, the latest churning just a few hundred miles off the coast of Florida in Haiti. In the end, there is no real mystery about the animal source of pandemics. It’s not some spiky scaled pangolin or furry flying bat. It’s populations of warm-blooded primates: The true animal source is us. – The Nation: Think Exotic Animals Are to Blame for the Coronavirus? Think Again; TRNN: COVID-19, Ebola, And SARS Outbreaks Were All Unleashed By Humans.

.

5G Immune Suppression Accident:

Electricty and Health: Arthur Firstenberg: The story of the invention and use of electricity has often been told before, but never from an environmental point of view. The assumption of safety, and the conviction that electricity has nothing to do with life, are by now so entrenched in the human psyche that new research, and testimony by those who are being injured, are not enough to change the course that society has set. Two increasingly isolated worlds—that inhabited by the majority, who embrace new electrical technology without question, and that inhabited by a growing minority, who are fighting for survival in an electrically polluted environment—no longer even speak the same language. In The Invisible Rainbow, Arthur Firstenberg bridges the two worlds. In a story that is rigorously scientific yet easy to read, he provides a surprising answer to the question, “How can electricity be suddenly harmful today when it was safe for centuries?” – Cell Phone Task Force: The Invisible Rainbow by Arthur Firstenberg.

5G and Coronavirus: Thomas Cowan: Because news outlets are blanketing us with updates on the coronavirus and the CDC’s prediction that a major epidemic is inevitable, I am getting a lot of questions about my understanding of this situation.  Before I share my thoughts, I want to emphasize that this is an immense, controversial and emotionally charged subject, one that demands careful thought, research and action.  I have no special insight into the genesis of this situation, besides the research I can do on my own.  I also want to emphasize that anyone who doesn’t take the time and effort to look into this article by Martin Pall, PhD, and the book “The Invisible Rainbow” by Arthur Firstenberg will most likely not have the full picture. This article is only a brief look at what these two pioneers are telling us. First, as I have previously explained, every instance of “influenza” epidemic in our modern era was associated with a radical change in the electrification of the earth immediately before the outbreak. One of the most studied of these pandemics was the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic, which killed millions of people around the globe. The Spanish influenza pandemic actually started not in Spain but in the U.S. in early 1918.  It was particularly associated with Naval bases and installations that were the first to install high-intensity radar.   The use of worldwide radar signals grew exponentially, and along with this expansion, the pandemic spread rapidly around the world, even appearing in places that had no contact with infected travelers.  In other words, it appeared on naval ships and ports at identical times, essentially proving that an infectious or contagious etiology was impossible. Also, paradoxically, the doctors at the time reported that their patients were not dying from respiratory complications, as one would expect from an infection with a respiratory virus; rather, as two physicians at the time stated: “We have yet to receive a report of a case in which the time of coagulation was not prolonged.” Their patients were dying of internal hemorrhaging, bleeding into the brain and complications of the failure of the coagulation of the blood.  This was a known side effect of the exposure of human blood to intense electrical exposures since at least 1779, when primitive electrical devices were first used on human subjects.  The 1956 flu pandemic directly followed the introduction of high-intensity radar installations off the coast of Alaska, Cape Cod and New York Harbor.  For the first time, the entire globe was subjected to a level of radar waves never before experienced on earth.  Within months of these installations going on line, the 1956 pandemic began. In 1968 the “Hong Kong flu” pandemic swept the globe.   This followed about eight months after the first satellites in the earth’s Van Allen radiation belt became operational.  Again, doctors noticed their patients dying of acute hemorrhages rather than the respiratory complications one would expect from complications of the flu.  The Van Allen belts are the protective electrical shield around the earth.  Never before had humankind been so unwise as to put radiation-emitting electrical devices directly into orbit around the earth. It seems that whenever there is a quantum leap in the intensity of electrical exposure, many people and many other living beings die.  They die quickly and they die from the well-documented changes in their blood.   This pattern has repeated itself over and over again.   This brings us to the coronavirus outbreak.   As Dr. Pall has made perfectly clear, Wuhan City in China, where the outbreak started, was the initial site of the most intense rollout of 5G wireless technology on the planet.  The rollout of 5G in our cities and towns across the globe also is coincident in time with the placement of thousands of radiation-emitting satellites in the ionosphere and magnetosphere.  Although I’m not aware that hemorrhagic events are occurring during the current coronavirus outbreak, Dr. Pall summarizes a number of studies in which EMF radiation is a co-factor in either suppressing our immune response to viral infections, or itself makes viral infections more lethal.  In either case, we are likely not dealing with a simple viral infection as much as the consequences of the intersection of a dramatic increase in our global EMF exposure, as well as a possible viral co-factor. If a virus is involved, then the afflicted people have sufficiently weakened immune systems that offer little defense against this virus.   This is a tragic situation, one that calls us to quickly wake up to the dangers of the further intensification of the electrification of the planet.  This is a planetary emergency. – Four Fold Healing: An Important 5G question about the Coronavirus.

5G Space Appeal: We call upon the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe and governments of all nations .. To take immediate measures to halt the deployment of 5G on Earth and in space …. Please respond to the Appeal Administrator listed below, detailing the measures you intend to take to protect the global population against RF radiation exposure, especially 5G radiation. This appeal and your response will be publicly available on www.5gSpaceAppeal.org. Respectfully submitted, Arthur Firstenberg, Appeal Administrator. – 5G Space Appeal: International Appeal: Stop 5G on Earth and in Space.

Covid-19 – 5G Correlation Study: At last, the first study has emerged regarding the very clear relationship between “coronavirus” outbreaks and the presence of 5G networks. To assess whether a correlation exists between cases of coronavirus and the presence of 5G networks. Without entering for the moment into subsequent cause-effect approaches in the case of positive results. Given that there is a sufficiently large statistical sample, it is possible for the results obtained to have a high level of reliability. The method used was to compare the incidence (no. of cases per 1000 inhabitants) between countries with and without 5G technology. Between regions of the same country with and without 5G technology. Between cities of the same state with and without 5G technology. Between different neighbourhoods of the same city with the 5G network map of that city. Comparing states with common borders with and without 5G technology. Comparing the case of one state within another, as is the case of San Marino. The data for each chart were taken on the same day. Graphic results and data published below: 1. Chart of the 9 countries with the most infections worldwide. 2. Chart and rates of infection of the 5 countries with the highest incidence in Europe. 3. Chart and rates of infection of 4 nearby countries at the same latitude: Portugal. 4. Spain, Italy, Greece. 5. San Marino: comparison of rates of infection with Italy and Croatia. 6. Italy: Incidence chart and 5G network. 7. Spain: 5G coverage chart and rates of infection. 8. Barcelona: Charts with 5G coverage and rates of infection. 9. Madrid: 5G coverage charts and rates of infection. 10. New York: coronavirus incidence chart and 5G network. 11. “Border effect” between Mexico and the USA. 12. Canada, USA and Mexico: chart of 5G networks and rates of infection. 13. Africa: 5G network chart. 14. Persian Gulf: 5G network and US military bases. 15. Chart and rates of infection of China and neighbouring countries. –  Radiation Dangers: Study Shows Direct Correlation between 5G Networks and “Coronavirus” Outbreaks; via Public Intelligence Blog: Mongoose: 5G Radiation Danger & Illness — DEFINITIVE!.

**

Brave New World of Bill Gates and Big Telecom: 5G Surveillance Dictatorship:
Recently, Bill Gates announced his financial support for a $1 billion plan to blanket Earth in video surveillance satellites.  The company, EarthNow, will launch 500 satellites to live-stream monitor almost every “corner” of the Earth, providing instantaneous video feedback with only a one-second delay. According to Wikipedia, the company expects its customers to include “governments and large enterprises.” 5G Antennas­­­ deploying a vast array of ground-based 5G spy antennas. Through his Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Gates purchased 5.3 million Crown Castle shares currently worth a billion dollars. The Foundation’s second-largest tech holding after Microsoft, Crown Castle owns 5G infrastructure in every major U.S. market. It operates and leases more than 40,000 cell towers, 65,000 small cell nodes which are the central infrastructure for 5G, and 75,000 route miles of fiber to every major U.S. market. 5G has almost nothing to do with improving your lives; it’s all about controlling your life, marketing products, and harvesting your data. Imagine a world where the government doesn’t need police officers to apprehend those surfers or ticket you when you violate social distancing with your girlfriend. Suppose that computers discover your beach trip by tracking your movements using a stream of information from your cell phone, your car GPS, facial recognition technology integrated with real-time surveillance from satellites, mounted cameras, and implanted chips. Desk-bound prosecutors or robots will notify you of your violation by text while simultaneously withdrawing your $1,000 penalty in cryptocurrency from your payroll account. Welcome to Bill Gates’ America. It’s right around the corner. – Childrens Health Defence: The Brave New World of Bill Gates and Big Telecom; Valuetainment: The Threat of 5G, via Activist Post: Congress Threatens to Reverse Military Opposed FCC 5G Ruling.

Bill Gates Giving Pledge Billionaire Partner: Massive 5G SA Investor:
Gates Giving Pledge Member Billionaire Patrice Motsepe’s African Rainbow Investments (ARC) said on Monday that it would be leveraging its shareholding in network provider Rain to make a R2 billion investment to build 700 5G sites in South Africa.  “Rain has indicated to the market that it currently has rolled out about 250 5G towers in Johannesburg, Centurion and Tshwane as part of its soft launch specifically and that it is aiming to roll out 700 5G towers country wide by end of 2020,” Moss said.  ….  African Rainbow Minerals chairman Patrice Motsepe announced on Wednesday that his family would join Bil Gates Warren Buffett’s The Giving Pledge Foundation. He becomes the first African to do so.  …….  Melinda Gates has handed over the co-chairmanship of Maverick Collective, an all women-led philanthropy group, to South African businesswoman and philanthropist Dr. Precious Moloi-Motsepe. ……  While Patrice Motsepe announced that they were donating R 1 billion for Covid-19 relief, poet Ntsiki Mazwai is not impressed. She has taken to her Twitter account to ask if South Africans were consulted about the 5G project, saying he only wants to make money. Did Patrice Motsepe engage South Africans about his 5G project? Did we say we’re okay with the radiation and the birth defects and getting cancer, so that he can make more money? – Business Report: Patrice Motsepe’s ARC moves to build 700 5G sites in SA; Global Citizen: Melinda Gates Names Precious Moloi-Motsepe to Global All-Women Philanthropy Group; Daily Maverick: Gates, Buffett, can you hear me? Patrice Motsepe gives away half of family fortune; Daily Sun: Ntsik Mazwa takes on Patrice Motsepe.

.

Psychotronic HAARP Electromagnetic Biowarfare Experiment:

Global Dimming Experiment?:
There is a documented effect called Global Dimming coming from the aerosols that are emitted as part of industrial activity (including air flights). Basically, these aerosols reflect sunlight, thus having a  cooling effect which somewhat offsets the warming effect of CO2. There is a line of thinking that says this: if we were to end human fossil fuel use (burning coal, air flights, etc.) then that would of course cut CO2 emissions. But it would also cut the aerosols as well. Now the issue is that CO2 stays in the atmosphere for hundreds of years, while aerosols drop out in days. Therefore, we would be stuck with the warming effect of CO2, but lose the cooling effect of the aerosols, thus resulting in a rapid net increase of global temperature. This paper estimates a 1C increase by end of century if we dramatically cut aerosol emissions (as many think we will). The enigmatic Sam Carana who writes on the Arctic News Blogspot estimates an even bigger impact in his cheerful extinction chart. So… given all of this, let’s think about the recent Coronavirus and it’s impact to industry and air travel.  While I suspect it is not truly crushing global output, it is certainly having a significant effect in China (and probably some knock-on affects elsewhere as well).  For certain, China air travel is being significantly affected. That said, it seems like we might have an inadvertent experiment underway which might give us a clue as to the real impact of Global Dimming and how emissions cuts may (or may not) impact global temperatures (or perhaps regional temps). As I say all this, I do not want to minimize the devastating tragedy that is unfolding due to Coronavirus. I wish it were not happening. But since we are faced with it, perhaps we can glean some useful information. – Reddit: Will Coronavirus be an inadvertent experiment to measure or confirm Global Dimming?.

Exponential Growth Education Experiment?:
Imagine if WiP Babylonian Kufr generals, academia, politicians and journalists, religious whores gave a flying fuck about flattening the ecological overshoot curve [Crash Course: Exponential Growth & Power of Compounding; Growth Busters: Limits to Growth: Bacteria in a Bottle; World Population Balance: Understanding Exponential Growth; Al Bartlett: Arithmetic, Population and Energy]; i.e. educating their voters to cooperate to implement EoP – Return to Steppe Aryan Eden law – UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] international law requiring all citizens of the world to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.
» EoP Leg Sub: 25 Mar: EoP Re Covid 19 – measure Global Dimming / educate exponential function – experiment?; IG: 20-03-28_expgrowth_overshootv-covid19

 .

 Accidental Vaccine Gain of Function Biowarfare:

Mikovitz: Covid and Vaccines:  July Mikovits: In 2006 I co-founded and developed the first neuroimmune disease institute to study the cause and treatments of chronic fatigue syndrome. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome became epidemic in the 1980s. Doctors dismissed the ailment as psychosomatic “yuppie flu.” CFS primarily struck women. The medical community assumed they were physically and emotionally fragile and cracked under the pressure of corporate jobs. Dr. Mikovits discovered that 67% of women affected with CFS carried a mouse virus–called XMRV– Xenotropic Murine Leukemia related Virus–that appeared in healthy women only 4% of the time.  XMRV is also associated with cancers like prostate, breast, ovarian, leukemia, and multiple myeloma. Many women with XMRV go on to have children with autism. In 2009, Drs. Mikovits and Ruscetti published their explosive findings in the journal Science. But the question remained: how was XMRV getting into people? Mikovits: Then in 2011, our research strongly suggested that it entered the human virome through a contaminated blood supply and vaccines. Other researchers linked the first CFS outbreak to a polio vaccine given to doctors and nurses that resulted in the “1934 Los Angeles County Hospital Epidemic.” That vaccine was cultivated on pulverized mouse brains. Retroviruses from dead animals can survive in cell lines and permanently contaminate vaccines. Retroviruses from those dead animals can survive in cell lines and permanently contaminate the vaccines. XMRV is so hazardous that the mere presence of mouse tissue in a laboratory can contaminate other tissues in the same room. Dr. Mikovits’ studies suggested XMRV is present in the MMR and polio vaccines given to American children and the Japanese encephalitis vaccine given to military personnel. The dangers of mouse brain derived vaccines are now widely acknowledged. “… mouse brain derived vaccine has been associated with serious allergic and neurologic adverse events.” –American Academy of Pediatrics. Mikovits: We recognized that this mouse retrovirus was causing an alarming national health crisis. That is if the blood supply and vaccines were heavily contaminated with mouse retroviruses of many strains. As Dr. Mikovits and her team prepared to sound the alarm, Dr. Fauci used his power to silence her. Mikovits: What Tony Fauci, Ian Lipkin and Harold Varmus did was pressure me to be silent and withdraw our manuscript. I refused again. Anthony Fauci gave his own career and the vaccine program priority above the health and safety of all Americans. Mikovits: When I refused to be silent, Dr. Fauci stepped in and ordered that my computers and notebooks be confiscated and orchestrated the retraction of our science paper. Dr. Fauci abused his power and misused his office. Mikovits: He then removed all of my funding and prevented me from getting a job in government research from 2012 forward. – Childrens Health Defense: The Truth About Fauci: Featuring Dr Judy Mikovits; AlphaOmegaWorship: Dr. Judy Mikovits, PhD about: COVID-19 masks, pandemia, vaccines and transmitting disease; Hedys Academy: Dr Judy Mikovits American Researcher on Plague of Corruption and Coronavirus.

Gain-of-function (GOF) research involves experimentation that aims or is expected to (and/or, perhaps, actually does) increase the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens. Such research, when conducted by responsible scientists, usually aims to improve understanding of disease causing agents, their interaction with human hosts, and/or their potential to cause pandemics. The ultimate objective of such research is to better inform public health and preparedness efforts and/or development of medical countermeasures. Despite these important potential benefits, GOF research (GOFR) can pose risks regarding biosecurity and biosafety. – NIH: Gain of Function Research: Ethical Analysis.

Is the SARS-CoV-2 a ‘chimera virus’ made in the lab? A virologist’s warning. Experiments on lab-grown pathogens, a.k.a. “chimera viruses”, had been going on for years. They were done through so-called gain-of-function (GOF) research comprising virologists from across the world -— US, Europe, China. As early as 2015, a group of researchers has successfully created a “hybrid version of a bat coronavirus — one related to the virus that causes SARS”. Some of those experiments were funded with US taxpayers’ money. Scientists and ethicists have been engaged in raging debates over whether engineering lab variants of viruses with possible pandemic potential is worth the risks. In the 21st century, genetic sequencing and engineering are the new big-power frontiers … Q: Has there ever been a lab-engineered coronavirus from bats? Yes. On November 12, 2015, the highly-respected scientific journal Nature published an article about one. In the explanatory note, researchers stated: “An experiment that created a hybrid version of a bat coronavirus — one related to the virus that causes SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) — has triggered renewed debate over whether engineering lab variants of viruses with possible pandemic potential is worth the risks.” Scientist describe the jump of diseases from bats to other animals and humans as viral spillovers. .. Q: Chimeric virus: Double meaning? It’s a well-known term used in the virology community. A chimeric virus has a double meaning. One, it refers to dormat viruses revived by scientists after being unearthed in the frozen wasteland of Siberia. Two, it denotes research by virologists to allow viruses to “gain” — or improve — “function”, by combining parts of other viruses or other organisms. …. Did anyone warn the world about doing GOF research of flu viruses? Yes. Several warnings issued from as early as 2010. A basic definition by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) states: Gain-of-function (GOF) research involves experimentation that aims or is expected to (and/or, perhaps, actually does) increase the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens (small organisms such as bacteria or viruses that can cause disease).” At least four public-domain research work, published between 2000 and 2014, had some virology experts already warning about the dangers of such GOF experiments using “unproven techniques”. Warnings were issued through peer-reviewed papers and published in several journals. In particular, one warning was about the so-called “GOF influenza virus research”. French virologist Dr Simon Wain-Hobson French branded the term “gain-of-function” as “misleading”, with regard to this particular study. Q: What’s wrong with gain-of-function (GOF) research to achieve “aerosol transmission of avian flu”? It’s “irrational”, charged Prof. Wain-Hobson in an article published by the US National Academies Press. Wain-Hobson and other peers wrote several papers, issuing the same warning, including in the publication Science in 2013. “There is nothing good to be gained,” Dr Wain-Hobson wrote in 2014. There had been at least one scientific conference among hundreds of biotech, epidemiology and virology experts that saw fierce debates on the merits of developing chimeric or “franken-viruses”. … Q: What triggered Dr Wain-Hobson’s warning? Dr Wain-Hobson gave a stark warning: “If transposable to humans, this would constitute a novel virus with a case fatality rate ~30 greater than that of Spanish flu.” “The controversial experiments confer aerosol transmission on avian influenza virus strains that can infect humans, but which are not naturally transmitted between humans. Some of the newer strains are clearly highly pathogenic for man. – Gulf News: Coronavirus did not jump from Wuhan’s seafood market: Here’s the evidence.

Chris Martenson: More Evidence Covid-19 May not be Natural: The debate rages on, though evidence is starting to mount on the side of at least *some* manipulation. In Tuesday’s video, Chris talked about the polybasic furin cleavage site PRRA which looks suspiciously like an ‘insert’ in covid-19’s genetic coding. In today’s video, he focuses on the RaTG13 sequence, which raises even more questions. It suggests that either the sequence itself is not natural OR that the larger covid-19 virus isn’t. There are even further questions raised by the virus’ E protein. But enough of the science-speak. – Peak Prosperity: More Evidence Covid-19 May NOT be Natural.

.

Intentional Biowarfare:

Francis Boyle: And the smoking gun here is on page 11, near the bottom, the last full paragraph from the bottom where it says, “may provide a gain of function to coronavirus for efficient spreading in the human population— … gain of function technology is DNA genetic engineering of a dangerous biological warfare substances to begin with. .. It’s a turbo charging and gain of function work can only be done safely in a BSL-4 or a BSL-3 facility. So, I think clearly, this is the smoking gun that the Wuhan coronavirus came out of that BSL-4 facility. ….  This is clearly a weaponized biological warfare agent and there is no legitimate scientific or medical use for gain of function technology, DNA technology on biowarfare–  . All right, well, now let me get to the second study, which is another smoking gun and a bombshell, Alex; there’s no other word for it. You remember in our previous interview, you asked me if this had come out of the BSL-4 facility in Winnipeg, Canada – was stolen out of there. I said that that could have happened. Winnipeg is our equivalent of Fort Detrick. They do every type of hideous, offensive Nazi-type biological warfare work up there you can possibly imagine. But again, on the basis of materials, scientific materials, I had a chance to read over the weekend. I have changed my opinion on that. I think I have the definitive evidence where this came from and it came from the BSL-3 biowarfare lab at the University of North Carolina. Now I have condemned them before because they have done gain of function work, DNA genetic engineering on every hideous biological warfare agent you can imagine including MERS at that time, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome agent, which again, is a biowarfared coronavirus …… the Wuhan scientists took the North Carolina SARS with gain of function, which is already a biological warfare weapon, and they took the technology here behind this well-developed SARS HIV weapon and they all brought it back to the Wuhan a BSL-4 and tried to DNA genetically engineer it into a chimera, into a biological warfare weapon involving the coronavirus, the HIV virus and gain of function. – Infowars: Prof Francis Boyle exposes the bioweapons origins of the Covid-19 Coronavirus; Truthseeker: US Biowarfare Act Author: Studies Confirm Coronavirus Weaponized!; Spiro Skouras: US Biowarfare Act Author: Francis Boyle: Studies Confirm Coronavirus Weaponized!
» EoP Leg Sub: 15 Mar: Req for EoP TRC Info: Timberland: J Swartz; Chiquita: C Flores:  Nobel Peace Prize Nomination: Abel TRC Reason Freelancer.

.

Psychotronic – Abel v Kane Covid-19 Cold War – Pandemic:

The FSB and NSA have the psychotronic technology [IW: Hall Psychotronic technology] to read people’s minds and beam messages into their consciousness; which can also be used to cause a heart attack, stroke, pneumonia, respiratory diseases symptoms in a target individuals body.  In the context of any event they can psychotronically manipulate the why, who, where, when or how. When an individuals why strategic decision making motivations are strong, and such strategic goals are different to the psychotronic drone handler, then it takes less time and resources for the psychotronic drone handler to manipulate the individuals tactical decision making: the where, when and how actions. In doing so, the individuals tactical actions can be manipulated to include a series of above normal coincidence events. If or where the individual is involved in actions that can be interpreted as negligent or intentional criminal acts; then such coincidence events then the accused will find it extremely difficult to explain such above normal coincidence events, particularly to any investigator, whose ego or whose bosses ego’s refuse to investigate the truth wherever it goes.
» EoP Leg Sub: 03 Apr: EoP Covid Cold War Obs: Crozier v NavSec; US v Moreno.

Psych CCTV Tapes: If the NSA and/or Kremlin were psychotronically monitoring any of the events you are investigating; they have tapes of the statements, thoughts, motives, heart rate, etc of the particular individuals. …………. I do know that if or when any American or foreign military intelligence agency – FSB, MI6 or Mossad – were monitoring or psychotronically manipulating any particular event; they have psychotronic bodycam footage of the event. Highly advanced psychotronic technology works similar; but far more advanced; than what is referred to as remote viewing [Remote Viewing Info: Suspect Zero; Christine Hart: News of the World & Feathermen; David Morehouse: Psychic Warrior]. Put simply; its very similar to an individual in charge of manipulating a drone; except that the drone is a human. So they are like a bodycam on the individual; but not only can they hear, see and record everything the person sees and hears; they can also know what the person is thinking about what they see and hear. They can record other bodily senses: heart rate, etc.
» EoP Leg Sub: 13 Feb: EoP Amicus Req; RE: WiP #16-MJ-00006: USA v A Bundy et al: Lavoy Finicum Bodycam Surveillance; 09 Jun: Is DoJ Order No 3915-2017 Special Counsel – EoP and WiP; or WiP Only – Legal Cult Enquiry?; 10 Mar: H 45/19: LJvCRLRC: Req NMF & MAD EoP TRC or No EoP TRC Vote.

First SA Parliamentarian to die from Abel-Kane WMD Cold-War: Amos Komeni:
A senior official in Parliament has died of coronavirus after he contracted the disease. Amos Komeni (60) worked in the office of the Deputy Speaker, Lechesa Tsenoli. …. Gladys Bakubaku-Vos informed her colleagues on Monday that she tested positive for the novel coronavirus and that she was in hospital since Saturday, ANC leader in the legislature Cameron Dugmore said in a statement on Tuesday.– MSN: Senior parliamentary official dies after contracting Covid-19; N24: Western Cape ANC MPL tests positive for Covid-19.
» EoP Leg Sub: 05 May: McVeigh2020: EoP v WiP Lawship As to SAFE Inst of Coaching Leadership Qs.

First Sub Saharan African to die from Abel-Kane WMD Cold-War: Rose-Marie Compaore:
The first Sub-Saharan African to die of Covid-19 was Burkina Faso parliamentarian Rose-Marie Compaore [France 24: Burkina Faso reports Sub-Saharan Africa’s first coronavirus death as WHO warns ‘prepare for worst’]. Africa’s Abel Responsible Freedom Cold War Revolutionary – Thomas Sankara [AfrikaNewsItaly: Thomas Sankara: The Upright Man] – was betrayed by his Kane Slavery Freedumb soldier friend Blaise Compaore [Wikipedia: Blaise Compaore].
» EoP Leg Sub: 29 Mar: EoP Obs: Abel Sankara and Kane Compaore Covid Cold War; 03 Apr: EoP Covid Cold War Obs: Crozier v NavSec; US v Moreno; 05 May: McVeigh2020: EoP v WiP Lawship As to SAFE Inst of Coaching Leadership Qs.

Stan McChrystal: Biden Bite Me … Amos Soma?… Komeni Khameini .. Vos Vis Kos:
“Are you asking about Vice President Biden?” McChrystal says with a laugh. “Who’s that?” “Biden?” suggests a top adviser. “Did you say: Bite Me?” ………. In reality resource conflict is a symptom of wider [resource conflict resulting from international law clauses enabling breeding and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits] problems; and so if you just go after the symptoms, over time; you’ll feel good about it. You can even point to your constituence or point to anybody, look at all we’re doing’; but the problem can actually be getting worse. ….
[innocence for sale indulgences clauses of international law allowing citizens to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits] Soma is a kind of opiate in Brave New World that causes people to feel happy so that they don’t concentrate on the reality that they live in a [Babylon War is Peace international law slaughterhouse] dictatorship. Soma is described as having “all the advantages of Christianity and alcohol; none of their defects.” It allows its users to take a short break from reality and return without a headache and without the need to harbor the mythology of religion. People (such as Bernard and Lenina) take soma with their coffee before they go out to socialize at night, and there are ice-cream soma bars. The people are so used to taking soma, that they find it impossible and frightening to face life without it. Soma is used to maintain social order and keep people from feeling any negative human emotions, such as jealousy, depression, sadness, or anxiety. –  Rolling Stone: The Runaway General: The Profile That Brought Down McChrystal; Foreign Affairs: Stan McChrystal: Military Strategy; ENotes: In Brave New World, what is soma? Can it be compared to Prozac?; Martin Luther: Trailer: Innocence for Sale Indulgences.
» EoP Leg Sub: 20 Sep: EoP Re: Kavanaugh Appoints OKC Bomb Pros: Beth Wilkinson as Counsel; 05 May: McVeigh2020: EoP v WiP Lawship As to SAFE Inst of Coaching Leadership Qs.

.

Conclusion:

William Catton: Ecological Overshoot: Infinite Growth on a Finite Planet: The difference between Real Solutions that Solve Resource Conflict Problems and Fake Solutions that Aggravate Resource Conflict Problems: On the banks of the Volga in 1921 a refugee community was visited by an American newspaper correspondent who had come to write about the Russian famine. Almost half the people in this community were already dead of starvation. The death rate was rising. Those still surviving had no real prospect of prolonged longevity. In an adjacent field, a lone soldier was guarding a huge mound of sacks full of grain. The American newsman asked the white-bearded leader of the community why his people did not overpower this one guard, take over the grain, and relieve their hunger. The dignified old Russian explained that the sacks contained seed to be planted for the next growing season. “We do not steal from the future,” he said. Today mankind is locked into stealing ravenously from the future. That is what this book is about. It is not just a book about famine or hunger. Famine in the modern world must be read as one of several symptoms reflecting a deeper malady in the human condition— namely, diachronic competition, a relationship whereby contemporary well-being is achieved at the expense of our descendants. By our sheer numbers, by the state of our technological development, and by being oblivious to differences between a method that achieved lasting increments of human carrying capacity and one that achieves only temporary supplements, we have made satisfaction of today’s human aspirations dependent upon massive deprivation for posterity. A major aim of this book is to show that commonly proposed “solutions” for problems confronting mankind are actually going to aggravate those problems. Proposed remedies for various parts of our predicament need to be evaluated by asking whether they will intensify the adversary relationship between people living today and people of the next generation, and the next…Because this book is meant to overcome our habit of mistaking techniques that evade limits for techniques that raise them, it is, in a sense, a book about how to read the news perceptively in revolutionary times. That cannot be done without certain unfamiliar but increasingly indispensable concepts. “Carrying capacity” is one of them. Until recently, only a few people outside such occupations as wildlife management or sheep and cattle ranching have even known this phrase. Its vital importance to all of us has not been as obvious as it is now becoming. The time has come for scholars and everyone else to take a piercing look at the relationship between the earth’s changing capacity to support human inhabitants and the changing load imposed by our numbers and our requirements. The direction of recent change makes this relationship just about the most important topic there is for people to know about, and think about. It has now become essential to recognize that all creatures, human or otherwise, impose a load upon their environment’s ability to supply what they need and to absorb and transform what they excrete or discard. An environment’s carrying capacity for a given kind of creature (living a given way of life) is the maximum persistently feasible load—just short of the load that would damage that environment’s ability to support life of that kind. Carrying capacity can be expressed quantitatively as the number of us, living in a given manner, which a given environment can support indefinitely. When the load at a particular time happens to be appreciably less than the carrying capacity, there is room for expansion of numbers, for enhancement of living standards, or both. If the load increases until it exceeds carrying capacity, overuse of the environment reduces its carrying capacity. That is why it has become important to recognize the difference between increasing the number an environment can support indefinitely and surpassing that number by “accepting” environmental damage. Overuse of an environment sets up forces that will necessarily, in time, reduce the load to match the shrinkage of carrying capacity. As these points begin to indicate, in order really to understand our future we need a clear-headed ecological interpretation of history, because the pressure of our numbers and technology upon manifestly limited resources has already put out of reach the previously acceptable solutions to many of our problems. There remains steadfast resistance to admitting this, but facts are not repealed by refusal to face them. On the other hand, even the “alarmists” who have been warning of grave perils besetting mankind have not fathomed our present predicament. Man is like every other species in being able to reproduce beyond the carrying capacity of any finite habitat. Man is like no other species in that he is capable of thinking about this fact and discovering its consequences. Thinking about other species, man has seen their dependence upon environmental chemistry and upon the energy of sunlight. Man has recognized the many-faceted interdependence of diverse organisms, their impact upon their habitat, their impermanence, and their inability to foresee and evade the processes leading to their 6 own displacement by successors. Thinking about our own species, however, at least until April, 1977, too many of us imagined ourselves exempt, supernatural. Until a president not yet worn down by the compromises inherent in office-holding nudged Congress and the American people into serious discussions of conservation, men and women throughout the United States and many other lands relied on technological progress to cure the very afflictions it had been causing. The sequel has begun to happen, but it is not generally recognized for what it is. We have come to a time when old assumptions that compel us to misunderstand what is happening to us have to be abandoned. We and our immediate ancestors lived through an age of exuberant growth, overshooting permanent carrying capacity without knowing what we were doing. The past four centuries of magnificent progress were made possible by two non-repeatable achievements: (a) discovery of a second hemisphere, and (b) development of ways to exploit the planet’s energy savings deposits, the fossil fuels. The resulting opportunities for economic and demographic exuberance convinced people that it was natural for the future to be better than the past. For a while that belief was a workable premise for our lives and institutions. But when the New World became more populated than the Old World had been, and when resource depletion became significant, the future had to be seen through different lenses. Assumptions that were once viable but have become obsolete must be replaced with a new perspective, one that enables us to see more effectively and to understand more accurately. This book seeks to articulate that needed perspective. It is no easy task, for the new way of seeing must differ sharply from traditional assumptions. Being unfamiliar, the new perspective will initially be distasteful and seem implausible. We shall continue to wish that some of the experiences it enables us to understand more clearly were not happening. But if we have the wisdom implied by the name we gave our own species, we must face the fact that continued misunderstanding of unwelcome experiences cannot prevent them from happening and cannot insulate us from their consequences. – Deep Green Resistance: Overshoot: Infinite Growth on a Finite Planet.

Judge Jason Brent: All resource conflict, including Biological and Chemical Warfare are Symptoms of Babylon WiP international law ecological overshoot:
‘We must all understand that the most potent weapons of war are the penis, the womb, and the ego. Therefore, if you cannot convince a group to control its population and consumption, to below carrying capacity limits; by discussion, debate, intelligent analysis, etc.; you must consider their action in using the penis and the womb to increase population; or using the ego to consume in violation of carrying capacity limits; an Act of War’ – Amended version of quote by Judge Jason G. Brent, in Humans: An Endangered Species.

Biological Warfare: Biological Warfare is simply a symptom of breeding and consumption biological behaviours. The most dangerous root cause biological warfare ingredients are (a) male sperm; (b) female ovaries; and (c) ego-gender insecurity memeplexes that have hijacked our brain-matter/minds; to engage in breeding war and consumption warfare behaviour; resulting in ecological overshot, standing armies and finally military biological warfare.

Chemical Warfare: Chemical Warfare is simply a symptom of breeding and consumption chemical behaviours. The most dangerous root cause chemical warfare ingredients are (a) male sperm; (b) female ovaries; and (c) ego-gender insecurity memeplexes that have hijacked our brain-matter/minds; to engage in breeding war and consumption warfare behaviour; resulting in ecological overshot, standing armies and finally military chemical warfare.

Fraud of UN ‘Peace’ and ‘War’ Treaties: Any United Nations endorsed international treaty related to ‘war’ or ‘peace’ that ignores specifically addressing the breeding war and consumption war violation of carrying capacity limits root causes of ecological overshoot, which subsequently manifests as cannon fodder standing armies and their creation of military chemical, biological, technological, electronic and other related warfare ingredients, is based upon deception and fraud.
» EoP Leg Sub: EoP PoW Submission to Swiss Federal Council: EoP PoW Sub.

Judge Jason Brent: Execute Sustainable Development Academic Fraudsters:
There are no differences between economic and sustainable development. The concept of sustainable development was created by fools and cowards who were afraid to advise humanity that since the earth and the resources it can provide humanity are finite, both economic and population growth must and will cease in the very near future. They are attempting to confuse and mislead humanity by putting the word “sustainable” in front of the word “development” they can convince humanity that economic growth will continue forever into the future and humanity will not have to face the stoppage of growth. Everyone who created the concept or use the words “sustainable development: should be executed for crimes against humanity and pure stupidity and arrogance – Quora: Jason Brent A: What is the difference between economic and sustainable development?
» EoP Leg Sub: 03 Jun: EoP Re: Judge JBrent: SustDev academic fraudsters should be executed.

.

6 Comments

    1. […] by 5G and pollution; or (e) negligent or intentional iatrogenic biological warfare [08 May: Covid 19: Hoax, Experiment, Nature, Accident or Intentional?]. McVeigh 2020 does know that the root cause of all these Covid-19 – WMD hoax, natural, 5G […]

    1. […] EoP Covid 19 Obs [08 May: Covid 19: Hoax, Experiment, Nature, Accident or Intentional?] * Judy Mikovits: Individuals who want to keep their immune systems strong, whether they already […]

    1. […] by 5G and pollution; or (e) negligent or intentional iatrogenic biological warfare [08 May: Covid 19: Hoax, Experiment, Nature, Accident or Intentional?]. McVeigh 2020 does know that the root cause of all these Covid-19 – WMD hoax, natural, 5G […]

Leave a Comment