19 May: LJ v GHJ: Req for Info to G&H Johnstone

* Graeme Johnstone, Hilary Johnstone, Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys, Desere Barnard, Clive Johnstone, Ann Johnstone, Judy Mikovitz, Mikki Willis, Elevate, Scott Freeman
* 19 May: LJ v GHJ: Req for Info to G&H Johnstone
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v CHJ, LJ v GHJ / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: Lara Johnson <eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 23:54:45 +0200
Subject: Req for Info to G&H Johnstone.
To: Graeme Johnstone <graeme.johnstone@gmail.com>, Hilary Johnstone <hilary.johnstone@gmail.com>, “GHJ Counsel: Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard: Rachel Hannies” <rachel@bvdblegal.co.za>
Cc: Clive Johnstone <clann@telkomsa.net>, Ann Johnstone <annscg@telkomsa.net>
Message-ID: <67053ad89957d3b387b4b157b7785555@tygae.org.za>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 00:00:12 +0200
Subject: TC: GJohnstone Re Judy Mikovits
To: “Judy Mikovitz via Mikki Willis: Elevate” <contact@elevate.us>, “Counsel: Scott Freeman” <sfreeman@fclaw.com>
Cc: Graeme Johnstone <graeme.johnstone@gmail.com>, Hilary Johnstone <hilary.johnstone@gmail.com>, “GHJ Counsel: Brand & van der Bergh Attorneys: Desere Barnard: Rachel Hannies” <rachel@bvdblegal.co.za>
Message-ID: <cbae79e1c06d61503d0c149a0d755913@tygae.org.za>


TO: Graeme & Hilary Johnstone
CC: Counsel: Desere Barnard
CC: Clive and Ann Johnstone
Transparency Copy: Judy Mikovits

Graeme and Hilary:

Req for Info to G&H Johnstone.

On 08 May 2020, Ma shared a 07 May 2020 Judy Mikovits facebook post on Pas facebook page [PNG].  The next day, on mothers day 09 May 2020: Pa had another GI internal bleeding attack, making his daily motion black with blood. Presumably the two events are related by both being at least partially psychotronically [OSI: Alex Jones: Dr John Hall: Psychotronic Technology] manipulated.

Graeme Johnstone: ‘[Judy Mikovits] was fired, is a disgruntled employee and is not well. Total rubbish.’

Lara Johnstone: I’m not sure judges or jury’s consider it to be an absolute fact that individuals who were fired and/or are disgruntled are lying about the reasons for why they were fired or are disgruntled. It is quite possible that people who are fired were objectively unjustly fired, and that people who are disgruntled about being fired, have at least partial, if not total valid objectively and/or subjectively reasonable justifications for being disgruntled about being objectively and/or subjectively unjustly fired. Please define ‘not well’. What exactly did Judy Mikovits say that is ‘total rubbish’?

I don’t pretend to know whether Covid-19 (a) actually exists or is just another Iraq-WMD military medical media industrial complex WiP Law slaughterhouse culling hoax; (b) some cases attributed to Covid are the result of one or more military agency’s use of psychotronic technology [03 Apr: EoP Covid Cold War Obs: Crozier v NavSec; US v Moreno]; (c) is the result of natural zoonotic disease jumping from animals to humans; (d) caused and/or aggravated by 5G and pollution; or (e) negligent or intentional iatrogenic biological warfare [08 May: Covid 19: Hoax, Experiment, Nature, Accident or Intentional?].

I do know that the root cause of all these Covid-19 – WMD hoax, natural, 5G laboratory or biowarfare negligent or intentional – symptoms are a direct and indirect result of overpopulaton and overconsumption resulting from politicians, legislators, academics and citizens negligent or intentional failure to abolish Babylon War is Peace international law [EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF], and implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation.


Ma and Pa were concerned about the statement you posted to Pa’s facebook page, about Judy Mikovits.

They asked me what I thought about what you wrote. I said that your thoughts about Judy Mikovits are probably very similar to your ‘not well mental disorder’ thoughts about me.

What was different is that for the first time you had put what you thought on these issues in writing; whereas before you presumably had only made these kinds of statements verbally.

I asked her what she thought would happen if our court case was not resolved before she and/or Pa died. What would your response be to me, if she and pa were dead?

Ma asked me whether I would be willing to resolve the issues out of court. I said I would. She suggested we schedule a meeting to clarify what our facts in dispute are, and see if any of those facts in dispute can be resolved out of court.

I said that would be okay, and another option was the Rental Housing Tribunal as an informal mediation option, where you would not need a lawyer and could represent yourself; if any resolution resulted in amending our Taaibos Ave barter exchange agreement.

Ma asked if I thought you would be willing to resolve the issues out of court. I said I don’t know, but the only way we can find out is by asking you.

She asked me to email you to ask you whether you would be interested in attempting to resolve the issues in our legal dispute, out of court; and if you would, what your preferred way for doing so would be.


EoP/OKC TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]


Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529


Leave a Comment