20 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options: Defining Enemy

* IJR, Stanley Henkeman, Charles Villa-Vicencio, Jan Hofmeyr, Tim Murithi, Ric Amansure, Felicity Harrison, Desmond Tutu, Mpho Tutu van Furth, DL Tutu Legacy Foundation, Piyushi Koetcha, Romaney Pinnock, Tutu HIV Foundation, Lavinia Browne, The Elders, Cohen Group, James Mattis, Mark Esper, DoD Duty Officer, Donald Rumsfeld, William Cohen, Ash Carter, NATO Military Comm, Stuart Peach
* 20 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options: Defining Enemy.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v TRC, LJ v TRC, EoP v NobelLJ v LS / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: EoP Axis Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Religion, EoP v WiP Peacenik  / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: Lara Johnson [mailto:eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za]
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2020 2:07 PM
To: ‘IJR: Stanley Henkeman’
Cc: ‘Cohen Group: James Mattis’; ‘Trump SecDef: Mark Esper via DoD Duty Officer’; ‘GWBush SecDef: Donald Rumsfeld’; ‘BClinton SecDef: William Cohen’; ‘Obama SecDef: Ash Carter’; ‘NATO Military Comm: ACM Stuart Peach via NCI Agency Info Officer’
Subject: Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2020 2:14 PM
To: ‘Charles Villa-Vicencio’; ‘IJR: Simone Naidoo’; ‘Jan Hofmeyr’; ‘Tim Murithi’; ‘Ric Amansure’; ‘Felicity Harrison’; ‘Desmond Tutu via Mpho Tutu van Furth’; ‘DL Tutu Legacy Foundation: Piyushi Koetcha’; ‘Romaney Pinnock’; ‘Tutu HIV Foundation’; ‘Lavinia Browne’; ‘The Elders’
Subject: Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options

.

TO: IJR: Stanley Henkeman
CC: IJR: Charles Villa-Vicencio
CC: Tim Murithi, Jan Hofmeyr, Felicity Harrison, Ric Amansure
CC: Desmond Tutu, Mpho Tutu van Furth, DLTLF, Tutu HIV Fnd, Elders:
CC: Donald Rumsfeld, James Mattis

Stanley Henkeman:

Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options.

Re EoP Response [18 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options] your 18 June 2020 email [18 Jun: IJR-SH Re LJ Re CCMA-MM&VG: 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options] in response to LJ v TRC negotiations email [17 Jun: LJ Re CCMA-MM&VG: 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options].

IJR-SH: The IJR is an NGO that was started by Professor Charles Villa-Vicencio and was never intended nor acted as a continuation of the TRC.

EoP-LJ: In what way do you mean IJR and the TRC are strategically or tactically different in terms of your reconciliation goals and/or work? Does the IJR have a different definition for reconciliation – an act of reconciling, as when former enemies agree to an amicable truce – than the TRC?
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options.

I don’t know what TRC Commissioners and/or IJR definition of reconciliation is. Dictionary reconciliation and reconciling definitions [Dictionary: Reconcile; Reconciliation]

Reconciliation noun
* an act of reconciling, as when former enemies agree to an amicable truce.
* the state of being reconciled, as when someone becomes resigned to something not desired.
* the process of making consistent or compatible.

reconcile verb (used with object), rec·on·ciled, rec·on·cil·ing.
* to cause (a person) to accept or be resigned to something not desired:
* to win over to friendliness; cause to become amicable:
* to compose or settle (a quarrel, dispute, etc.).
* to bring into agreement or harmony; make compatible or consistent:

If you are in general agreement with the reconciliation definition – the act of reconciling, as when former enemies agree to an amicable truce – then the process of reconciling means (a) defining the enemy; (b) talking to the enemy to find win-win cooperation compromise resolution of the issues in dispute.

[Donald Rumsfeld] Today we lack [[scientific legal definition]] metrics to know if we are winning or losing the global war on terror. Have we fashioned the right mix of rewards, amnesty, protection, and confidence in the US? Are the changes we have and are making too modest and incremental? My impression is that we have not yet made truly bold moves, although we have made many sensible, logical moves in the right direction, but are they enough? Do we need a new organization? Is our current situation such that “the harder we work, the behinder we get” ? – [[EoP Amended]] Donald Rumsfeld: 26 January 2015
» IG: 15-02-12_drumsfeld-globalwaronterrormetricsq.

[Avi Dicther: Head of Shinbet: 200-2006] As someone who knows the Palestinians well, I claim that there should be no problem building a system of trust with them, a genuine one. [Carmi Gillon: Head of Shinbet: 1994-1996] For Israel, its too much of a luxury not to speak with our enemies. As long as they decide not to speak, I have no choice, but when we decide not to speak. I think we’re making a mistake. [Avrahom Shalom: Head of Shinbet: 1980-1986] Its a trait of a professional intelligence service operative to talk to everyone. Things get clarified. I see you don’t eat glass. He sees I don’t drink petrol. Thats how it is. – ABC-AU: The Gatekeepers: Israel’s Shinbet spy leaders call for peace.

[Mike Flynn] “I think what I’m saying is that the strategy that we’ve had is not — is not working. I mean, it’s clearly not working. Just look at the kinds of things we’re facing. I mean, I — you know, in my — in my world, what I have grown up to have to do is define the enemy that we are facing. Like I said, if you — you can’t defeat an enemy that you don’t admit exists and I think that we have to clearly define what the enemy is. That’s number one.” – Lt Gen Michael Flynn; Fox: ‘You Can’t Defeat An Enemy You Don’t Admit Exists’: Obama’s Former DIA Chief: US Strategy To Fight Terrorism ‘Clearly Not Working.’
» IG: 16-09-08_mflynndefineenemy.

Lucky decided to use the Brooklyn gangsters in a bold new venture: The Syndicate. The Syndicate was a nationwide organization that brought together various criminal elements from major cities, across the United States, predominantly on the East Coast. The driving force behind the Syndicate was a sicilian mobster from Manhattan, Charles Lucky Luciano. He was the man who was strong enough to bring in the bosses from New York and then the bosses from the rest of the country and explain to them that cooperation rather than competition, was in their best interests. Until then disputes between gangs were usually settled with violence, bullets and bombings. It was almost punk warfare and there was no real arbitrator about what would happen. It was about who was the toughest and the meanest and had the best gunslingers. In 1934 New Yorks top mobsters held a summit and agreed that gang warfare had to stop. They realized that the pie they had been fighting over for many years was actually large enough, that sharing it, was more beneficial than fighting over it.. The syndicate became a cooperative, with a national board of directors. Chosen to sit on the so-called Board of Directors were Lucky Luciano and Buckalter along with six top mobsters from the east coast. – Organized Crime Channel: Murder Inc. – The Mafia’s Own Murder Incorporated | Luciano Lansky & Siegel; National Crime Syndicate: Who Were Murder Inc?.
» IG: 17-10-11_murderinc-nashequilibrium-bmind

[Vladimir Lenin & Leon Trotsky] VL: It is not the style which bothers me, I think its too soft. LT: I don’t understand. VL: Alright, how do we achieve this future that you are talking about? LT: By struggle, how else? VL: But against who?  LT: The state and the classes whose interests it protects. VL: The duty of the revolutionary is to fight those forces and personalities which impede or obstruct the socialist revolution. LT: Thats what I said. VL: No it isn’t what you said, and you must see the difference. The future is less than six months away; and we make the future with every new theory we evolve, every organizational change we set in progress. There will be no revolution. Millions will not be mobilized against the Tsar estate unless we make it possible. We are marxists. We understand as the anarchists and liberals cannot the nature of power, the state and so on. But it is not enough to know the world, we must learn how to change it, and in order to do that, we must first and foremost build an organization. A party to develop the theory and lead the revolutionary struggle. You see what I mean. Objectively the enemy can be your best friend, your lover, your party colleague, the party chairman of your local branch, the editor of your party journal. The enemy is he who impedes the course of the revolution. Comrade Trotsky, the battle for now is not with the Czar, it is with ourselves. – Fall of Eagles: 06: Absolute Beginners: Lenin and Trotsky in London.
» EoP Leg Sub: 22 Apr: The question is no longer whether Revolution, but how and when and led by whom.

Defining the Enemy: Whom should the military kill?:
Mattis stated in an interview with the author of the Mattis Way of War case study that if he could outfight the enemy commander; he wouldn’t have to fight his troops. [Military History Visualized: General Mattis’ Way of War (2001 – 2003)]. In the context of outfighting the enemy commander, which is – if you are an honourable warrior – always to find a win-win just solution to the resource conflict dispute you are engaged in: I don’t think it matters if the General or Admiral in charge of the troops has a vagina [Russian Resurrection: Battalion; The Great War: Russia’s New Offensive – The Russian Women’s Battalion of Death; Battle of the Camel: Mohammeds Wife Aisha] or a penis, or both or none, if the General or Admiral’s ego’s are capable of confronting Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles. In that context, the only operative question for such military commander’s honourable discussion, between themselves and with their troops; is: Whom should the military kill?  Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural intnl-law answer: Everyone convicted of an intentional procreation, consumption or deception crime of aggression [PDF: crime-of-aggression]; who refuses to cooperate to implement – and/or once implemented – abide by EoP Scientific and Cultural law [PDF: eop-scicultlaw] international law.
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 Aug: EoP TRC Info: USCAAF Judge Stucky; US Fed & State Judges.

EoP MILED Clerk definition of Enemy:

Generally speaking if your individual identity is that of conscious or unconscious Babylonian, then your enemy is probably a Babylonian Jew or Babylonian Kike or Babylonian sand nigger, or Babylonian cracker, or Babylonian communist, or Babylonian capitalist, etc, depending on your conscious or unconscious preferred racial / religious / ideological bias.

If you are an EoPeacenik [eop-axis-oath]; then your enemy is (a) the Babylonian War is Peace clauses of international law; that allow individuals who call themselves citizens to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, resulting in resource depletion, and consequent racial, religious, class, national, gender and inter-generational resource conflict; (b) the individuals of any race, religion, class or gender who consicously and intentionally obstruct the abolition of Babylonian War is Peace clauses of international law; and its replacement with Ecology of Peace clauses of international law; requiring all citizens of all races, religions, nations, classes and genders to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits, and relate in terms of fully informed consenting agreements. [Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF]
» EoP Leg Sub: 13 Jan: EoP Re: John Kaminski: Who exactly is the enemy here?; 22 Jan: EoP Apps: Draft: Withdrawal Notice Re: Duty to Warn Psych v Donald Trump..

There is not one person of any race, religion, ideology – irrespective of how extreme WiP left or right – class – whether oligarchs or homeless – or gender; who can say ‘EoP MILED Clerk refused to speak to me; refused to actively listen [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle: 9 min] to my request for help, refused to answer my questions, etc’. If I was able to help them, I did. If I was not able to help them, I did not waste their time and resources pretending that I could help them.

.

Obedience Consciousness & Enemy Definitions:

Robert McElvaine says that men generally seek to avoid a single standard of human behaviour and achievement. I don’t know if he is right or not, men have been involved in much of the creation of the global legal structure that is built upon definitions, which are a form of single standard metric measurement. .

Because men cannot compete with women’s capabilities in the crucial realms of reproduction and nourishing offspring, McElvaine argues, men generally seek to avoid a single standard of human behavior and achievement. They create separate definitions of “manliness” which are based on a false opposition to “womanliness.” A “real man” has been seen in most cultures as “notawoman.” – Amazon: Robert McElvaine: Eve’s Seed: Biology, the Sexes and the Course of History; Wikipedia: Eve’s Seed.

Aisha Ahmad appears to say that Arabian women prefer single simple and clear standard rules, even if they don’t like those rules, but if they understand the rules then they can protect themselves and their families survival; by obeying the rules.

“I can see the price of war on every single one of the price tags in the bazaar. … There’s a moment where you fear in your body that any rules are better than no rules. If you have complete anarchy and no one is constrained in any way, then there’s nothing I can really do to protect myself. But if there’s a system of rules, even if I don’t like the rules, that at least I can think, how can I play by them so that I can keep myself alive.” – Aisha Ahmad; CBC Radio: Follow the money to understand why Islamist groups succeed, says Jihad & Co author
» IG: 17-10-27_eopvwip-rulespollution

Stanley Milgram obedience studies found no difference between biological genders in terms of their obedience and disobedience to what they subjectively considered unjust laws or orders [Brian Burak: Milgram Experiment; HeroicImaginationTV: Stanley Milgram: Obedience to Authority].

Some people define ‘alpha male’ as male logic based on reason; and ‘beta’ as female’ logic based on emotion. Others define alphas as ego-emotional individuals who rely on masculine brute force to demand tribal rules obedience, and betas as individuals who do not rely on masculine brute force; but rely on persuasion and cooperation to achieve tribal rules obedience. History shows that alpha masculine brute force leadership is not always militarily and socio-culturally successful for the racial, religious, class or gender tribes they lead.

Gimbutas noted the stable Aryan population, that a village founded in 8000 BC was still a village 4000BC. This also allowed them to sustainably farm the land. And live in peace. Nobody was ripping off others to feed the kids he sired. …….. Dr. Paul Ekman started out studying monkey facial expressions, aware they cant lie, so the response to fear, surprise, joy, or whatever could be carefully itemized facial muscle movement. Examining the faces of people telling lies shows the full set is lacking; liars learn just enuf facial control to get by. There are other muscle movements, like with monkeys, that are autonomic; ie, they cannot be controlled. paulekman.com sells a CD to show you the diff. Witches and grandmothers picked up on it, also part of our hominid evolution, where the females need to read the face of the alpha male to know when he’ll strike out, and get the fuck out of his way. He dont have the problem, never cared what their faces told. So- again, the witches and midwives breed the men whose faces they can read, which is easier if the face is pale. So, what did that do to the usual expectation of genetic displacement or assimilation? Thus, the criteria of which men will remain in the gene pool is so different, that just because we see more of a given haplotype does not mean a massive invasion. ………  Primate video gives us the term “alpha male” to refer to those who inflict all the serious damage. DNA shows alphas sire alpha sons. They see the beta males place themselves between the alpha and the vulnerable young & females for alphas are impulsively aggressive. With the invention of the bronze axe, couples could homestead in the vast European forests. But if an alpha does not have a beta for his impulse, why then the wife and kids’ll do. Hence the peace of yeoman farmers who are all betas. ………….  Surprising given the history of European warfare. But a closer look shows a diff with other regions, where entire populations, like Jonah in Canaan, butchering everyone but the girls kept for sex slaves. Wars in Europe were aristocratic conflicts with the serfs seen as livestock, to serve new masters. When Trajan hauled the Jews to Rome, he only took the educated elite, leaving the ancestors of the Palestinians to serve new Roman masters. This is detected in the Aryan diaspora of 4000 BC. there is no rubble of burnt cities or villages. It was all, somewhat systematically, abandoned. Vitelli, ‘The Celts’ notes the first Celtic Hill forts dont show up until 500 years later. Barford, ‘The Early Slavs’ suggest why noting how they started out in a pioneer homestead system of dispersal in the great forests, no more than one log cabin/sq km hidden away. In defacto quarantine. Any organized army on the move soon got exposed to contagion and wiped out. The natural aggression and violence of alpha males, so common everywhere else, got filtered out of the European gene pool. ………  We read white skin is a rather recent mutation. But since Aryans didnt have marriage, the witches were able to select only the most manageable men for breeding. Of course, some monsters wear white skin, but we know genetics always has throwbacks. Aryan military success never needed the same number of violent warriors when there were so many peaceful, productive, and innovative men crafting improvements in armor, weapons, and tactics. Clausewitz, for one, notably gets into what we now call ‘logistics’ as critical for success. Like beta clerks counting the hay wagons to make sure there was enuf for the horses hauling canon. …. We love the smell of new mown hay. We even enjoy mowing the lawn and then looking back with the same eye on the mown field. We dont eat hay, but it was the gas for the original horsepower, and anything that aids in stocking up gratifies Aryan instincts. Much of what Clausewitz had to say “On War” has to do with making sure the horses had the hay to haul the canons, which allowed Frederich the Great to be the firstest with the mostest time and again. The Junkers were originally all yeoman farmers and knew how to make damn sure there was enuf hay. Aryan political leaders once proved their competence in the field with a Scythe, as if he could harvest enemies just like Death. Men with Scythes organized lines, 6ft from each man to the next, to sweep across a field cutting it all at the same time, scythes swinging in unison like a huge machine to get it all cut, dried, raked, and stacked before the next rain. If you could not get it all done, it was better to let it wait til after the rain. This same instinct to organize was used with swords & shields, and the Greeks all got how it mowed down Persians like a weed eater. But you needed men who instinctively liked, and knew, how to make teamwork get the job done – Proto Indo-European: 02 July 2017; 03 January 2017; 23 January 2017; 15 December 2015; 17 June 2015. 31 Oct 2014; 18 March 2016.
» SQSwans: Day Brown: 02 Jul 2017; 03 Jan 2017.

Nestar Russell and Annette Bolton research appears to indicate that – generally speaking – a significant majority of the 1% global elite of all genders; object to clear and simple global single standard of international laws rules; and the 98% will obey a single standard system of rules, even if they don’t particularly like some of those rules.

97.5 % of normal people, prefer to obey ethical laws: Nestar Russell and Annette Bolton: Awareness of impending climate catastrophe has greatly increased over the last 30 years. Increasing awareness, however, has not translated into decreasing but instead increasing greenhouse gas emissions.  …… Interestingly, as illustrated by Milgram’s previously mentioned Subject Free to Choose Shock Level condition, when ordinary people at the end of an organisational chain (e.g., consumers) are aware of the harmful consequences of their actions and they are then offered the unimpeded option to act ethically, 97.5 per cent chose to do so. As long as their self-interests are not too heavily compromised by manipulative up-stream meddling, Milgram’s research clearly illustrates that most people prefer to pursue what they understand to be the morally right course of action. Thus, perhaps more than any other factor, our present inability to avert climate catastrophe is largely an abuse of (mostly higher) power and a total failure of leadership. The fish rots from the head down. – MPDI: “Climate Catastrophe and Stanley Milgram’s Electric Shock “Obedience” Experiments: An Uncanny Analogy” [PDF].
» EoP Leg Sub: 23 Feb: EoP Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report.

So the focus of EoP MILED Clerk on behalf of EoP Applicants is (a) finding out whether there are sufficient numbers of the 02% elite who have no objections to the EoP Scientific and Cultural law single standard of scientific procreation, consumption and cultural honesty relating standard laws; and do not object to them being submitted to UN General Assembly for voting into international law; (b) if any 2% elite have objections: whether those objections are scientific or cultural; and whether the parties filing the objections are interested in truthseeking evidentiary enquiry to ascertain the in/accuracy of their scientific and/or cultural objections. If any 2% elite’s scientific or cultural law objections to EoP SciCult law are accurate, then EoP SciCult law can be amended to remove such errors.

Some individuals and/or groups of individuals who consider themselves enemies want to be reconciled, and some don’t.

If they sincerely want to be reconciled, they will cooperate to define their enemy; and once defined, cooperate by speaking and listening to their enemies, to find a win-win compromise solution to their issue in dispute.

If they do not want to be reconciled with their enemies, they will obstruct defining their enemy; and talking to their enemy; to avoid finding a compromise solution to their issues in dispute.

EoP/OKC TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529

Sent per electronic notice to:

IJR: Stanley Henkeman;
IJR: Stanley Henkeman (shenkeman@ijr.org.za);

Charles Villa-Vicencio:
Charles Villa-Vicencio (conflictresolution@georgetown.edu)

IJR: Tim Murithi, Jan Hofmeyr, Felicity Harrison, Ric Amansure:
IJR: Simone Naidoo (snaidoo@ijr.org.za); Jan Hofmeyr (jhofmeyr@ijr.org.za); Tim Murithi (tmurithi@ijr.org.za); Ric Amansure (ramansure@ijr.org.za); Felicity Harrison (fharrison@ijr.org.za);

Desmond Tutu, Mpho Tutu van Furth, DLTLF, Tutu HIV Fnd, Elders:
Desmond Tutu via Mpho Tutu van Furth (mphotutu2012@gmail.com); DL Tutu Legacy Foundation: Piyushi Koetcha (info@tutu.org.za); Romaney Pinnock (romaney@tutu.org.za); Tutu HIV Foundation (info@hiv-research.org.za); Lavinia Browne (Lavinia.Browne@hiv-research.org.za); The Elders (media@theelders.org);

Cohen Group: James Mattis:
Cohen Group: James Mattis (jmattis@cohengroup.net); Trump SecDef: Mark Esper via DoD Duty Officer (DutyOfficer@mail.mil); GWBush SecDef: Donald Rumsfeld (daniel@javelindc.com); BClinton SecDef: William Cohen (wcohen@cohengroup.net); Obama SecDef: Ash Carter (ash_carter_office@hks.harvard.edu); NATO Military Comm: ACM Stuart Peach via NCI Agency Info Officer (info@ncia.nato.int);

.

10 Comments

    1. […] The focus of EoP MILED Clerk on behalf of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants] if (a) finding out whether there are sufficient numbers of the 02% elite who have no objections to the EoP Scientific and Cultural law single standard of scientific procreation, consumption and cultural honesty relating standard laws; and do not object to them being submitted to UN General Assembly for voting into international law; (b) if any 2% elite have objections: whether those objections are scientific or cultural; and whether the parties filing the objections are interested in truthseeking evidentiary enquiry to ascertain the in/accuracy of their scientific and/or cultural objections. If any 2% elite’s scientific or cultural law objections to EoP SciCult law are accurate, then EoP SciCult law can be amended to remove such errors. » EoP Leg Sub: 20 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options: Defining Enemy. […]

    1. […] Aisha Ahmad: I can see the price of war on every single one of the price tags in the bazaar. … There’s a moment where you fear in your body that any rules are better than no rules. If you have complete anarchy and no one is constrained in any way, then there’s nothing I can really do to protect myself. But if there’s a system of rules, even if I don’t like the rules, that at least I can think, how can I play by them so that I can keep myself alive. – CBC Radio: Follow the money to understand why Islamist groups succeed, says Jihad & Co author [IG: 17-10-27_eopvwip-rulespollution] » EoP Leg Sub: 20 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options: Defining Enemy. […]

    1. […] which may be helpful when comparing different ‘single peacenik end ecocide standard’ [20 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options: Defining Enemy; 24 Jun: McV20: EoP Law Re: TAC: Here Come the Bourgeoisie Bolsheviks] […]

    1. […] Aisha Ahmad: I can see the price of war on every single one of the price tags in the bazaar. … There’s a moment where you fear in your body that any rules are better than no rules. If you have complete anarchy and no one is constrained in any way, then there’s nothing I can really do to protect myself. But if there’s a system of rules, even if I don’t like the rules, that at least I can think, how can I play by them so that I can keep myself alive. – CBC Radio: Follow the money to understand why Islamist groups succeed, says Jihad & Co author [IG: 17-10-27_eopvwip-rulespollution] » EoP Leg Sub: 20 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options: Defining Enemy; […]

    1. […] non-aligned, enemies – agreements to accomplish shared strategic and/or tactical goals [20 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options: Defining Enemy; 10 Jul: McV20: EoP A: WiP Law: Vusi Mohadi Q: Who Killed the […]

Leave a Comment