* Current Affairs, Nathan J Robinson, Krystal Ball, Saagar Enjeti, Hill TV, John Bolton, Charles Cooper, US DoJ, Brandon van Grack, Dana Boente, Michael Flynn, Robert Kelner, Stephen Anthony
* 20 Jun: McV20: EoP Law Re HillTV/CAffairs: Defining Left & Right Populism.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: McVeigh2020, EoP US DoJ, EoP v Michael Flynn, EoP v Alt Right / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: McVeigh 2020 Exp Comm [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2020 10:42 PM
To: ‘Current Affairs’; ‘Nathan J Robinson’; ‘Krystal Ball Saagar Enjeti’
Cc: ‘John Bolton: Counsel: Charles Cooper’; ‘Brandon van Grack’; ‘Dana Boente via John T Gibbs’; ‘Lt Gen Michael Flynn’; ‘Counsel: Robert Kelner’; ‘Stephen Anthony’
Subject: EoP Law Re HillTV/CAffairs: Defining Left & Right Populism
TO: Hill TV: Krystal Ball, Saagar Enjeti; Current Affairs: Nathan Robinson
CC: John Bolton, Michael Flynn
Re: Rising: Krystal Ball: Response to Nathan Robinson; Current Affairs: Debating the Right versus Collaborating with them.
Krystal, Saagar, Nathan:
EoP Law Re HillTV/CAffairs: Defining Left & Right Populism.
Nathan Robinson: I recently wrote about a book called The Populist’s Guide to 2020, by Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti, who co-host The Hill’s show Rising. The book’s premise is that today there is a rising kind of “left populism” and a rising “right populism” and that these can be described as part of one tendency and share “a single idea,” namely that “American families, workers, and communities which built this country still matter, they deserve a voice, and they are the future.” There is a populist movement, they write, as seen in “working class uprisings across the globe, from Donald Trump’s election [to] Bernie Sanders’ campaign.” Ball and Enjeti responded to me forcefully on their show Rising [Rising: Krystal Ball: Response to Nathan Robinson], with Ball delivering a biting monologue. I’d like to address their criticisms, because I think they misunderstand the arguments I am making, and that this misunderstanding is quite common when people talk about how the left should engage with the right, and what the differences are between left populism and right “populism.” ….. What I think we need to do is distinguish between “engaging people” and “softening/sanitizing their views.” And what I objected to about Ball and Enjeti’s book is not that it contains disagreements between the right and left—actually, the book is almost all about things they agree on—but that it presents “right-wing populism” as if it is simply a “polite disagreement” away from “left-wing populism.” Yet it doesn’t actually define clearly what “right-wing populism” is. As I asked previously: who are the right populists? What do they actually believe? Ball and Enjeti argue that there is a “right populist movement” in this country. Well, can we name some people in that movement? …. There is no unified right-left populist politics. – Current Affairs: Debating the Right versus Collaborating with them.
If your ism endorses WiP law [eop-v-wip-law]; it’s a colonialist / imperialist WiP ism [eop-v-wip-ism] cultural ideology. .. The excesses of capitalism, communism, and libertarianism are a symptom of Babylon Masonic War is Peace – right to breed & consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits – clauses of international law. EoP UN Resolution [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70]: Scientific and Cultural law [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.49-52/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.48-51/70] could be described as the place where capitalism, socialism, libertarianism, right and left meet deep green ecology root cause problem solving.
» EoP Leg Sub: 25 May: EoP Re: WSWS Re: Der Spiegel 2 Angela Merkel: take up anti-imperialist struggle; 17 Jun: EoP Re: The only real debt Chaos Monkey technologists have to society.
Important is First, or it isn’t. Honesty is First, or it isn’t Important. Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr: mcv20: PDF: pp.44-48/71] is honesty about objective reality for sincere peaceniks / honourable warriors. Ecology of Peace Scientific Law [eop-scicultlaw: mcv20: PDF: pp.49-52/71] refers to Procreation and Consumption below carrying capacity limits. EoP Footprint [eop-footprint: mcv20: PDF: pp.40-43/71] defines how procreation and consumption carrying capacity limit is measured. EoP Cultural law refers to any racial, religious, gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any EoP scientific laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals. Ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy: mcv20: PDF: pp.36-37/71] clarifies how to engage in and/or measure a fully informed consenting agreement. Individuals Rights and Duties under Scientific & Cultural Law: Property Ration [property-ration: mcv20: PDF: pp.59/71] – guaranteed for life – for all individuals who have signed and abide by their responsible freedom [responsible-freedom: mcv20: PDF: pp.61-62/71] oaths. Crimes of Aggression Violations of Scientific & Cultural Law: Violations of (a) Scientific Law are Procreation or Consumption Crimes of Aggression [crimes-of-aggression: mcv20: PDF: pp.32-34/71]; (b) Cultural Law are Deception Crimes of Aggression. EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw] – based on EoP Footprint [eop-footprint] – is the Ecology of Peace culture’s answer to the EoP John Brown – how to get along without deceiving, overbreeding and overconsuming – Question: What is a Sustainable Procreation and Consumption footprint? EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr] is the recommended objective reality socio-legal cultural frame of orientation process for implementing EoP SciCult law as international law.
» McVeigh 2020: Exploratory Committee.
Judge Jason Brent: Execute Sustainable Development Academic Fraudsters: There are no differences between economic and sustainable development. The concept of sustainable development was created by fools and cowards who were afraid to advise humanity that since the earth and the resources it can provide humanity are finite, both economic and population growth must and will cease in the very near future. They are attempting to confuse and mislead humanity by putting the word “sustainable” in front of the word “development” they can convince humanity that economic growth will continue forever into the future and humanity will not have to face the stoppage of growth. Everyone who created the concept or use the words “sustainable development: should be executed for crimes against humanity and pure stupidity and arrogance – Quora: Jason Brent A: What is the difference between economic and sustainable development?
» EoP Leg Sub: 03 Jun: EoP Re: Judge JBrent: SustDev academic fraudsters should be executed.
EoP Law racial, religious, ideological and gender national and global security definition can be summarized as building an EoP Axis Alliance to implement EoP UN Resolution [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70]: EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law.
Summary: EoP Axis Alliance.
The strategic priority for EoP culture is building an EoP Axis [eop-axis] Alliance [30 Nov: EoP Re: National Comm on Military, National and Public Service Enquiry; McVeigh 2020: TN to NATO: 14 Apr McV20 Notice: Defund UN, WB, IMF, NATO] to submit EoP UN Resolution to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70| lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.17-54/56 | lj-v-shoc: PDF: 43-84/88 | lj-v-nmn: PDF: pp.11-76/83| lj-v-trc: PDF: pp.30-71/137] as international law; to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation economic degrowth path to a low tech responsible freedom family farm agrarian economy.
An EoP Axis Alliance nation is a nation whose Head of State – on their own Milgram 2% decision making [Invictus: Dictator; Iron Lady; A Woman Named Golda; The Upright Man; John Brown; Bram Fischer]; or with a Milgram 35% EoP Axis Oath [eop-axis-oath] mandate from cabinet, parliament, judiciary, military and/or civil society [15 Mar: Milgram Two, Eight, Thirty Five & Ninety-Eight % Decision-Makers] – will instruct their UN Ambassador to (a) authorize EoP UN Resolution for submission to UN General Assembly by or before 31 Dec 2020; and/or if already submitted to UN General Assembly by or before 31 Dec 2020 [09 Mar: FilingLetter to Judge Nathan Erasmus: PDF; 16 Apr: CCMA 1063-20: LJ v TRC: Draft Settlement Agreement]; (b) to vote Aye authorizing EoP UN Resolution: EoP Scientific and Cultural law to become international law; at the time of the UN General Assembly – EoP UN Resolution – vote.
EoP Axis Alliance Head of State Legal and Military EoP UN Resolution Mandate Alternatives:
» Judiciary [eop-legcertenq: 21 Apr: DRAFT: Presidents of Russia, China; USA & EU: Joint letter to their Constitutional / Supreme Court Chief Justices. Subject: Re: EoP Axis Truth and Reconciliation to End Abel & Kane Cold War Negotiations; to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law];
» Military [RI: Crimea: 10 Aug: EoP Applicants: Draft: MilDem EoP UN Resolution Martial Law].
Summary: EoP Law – TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War – Axis Alliance negotiations:
The question is whether Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) Scientific and Cultural law [mcv20: PDF: pp.26-67/71; lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] enabling orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation return to sustainable low tech family farm agrarian economy [NBC: Eustace Conway’s Turtle Island]; or Masonic War is Peace (“WiP”) Babylon law enabling disorderly and inhumane race, religious and class war deindustrialization and depopulation Syria-Libya-Iraq slaughterhouse culling [Fox: Lt Col Ralph Peters: In a War you fight to win]; should be master intnl law; that’s all. [Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF].
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Jan: EoP v WiP Law Relevance Defns A: Re JManchin: If its relevant I want to hear it.
Lawrence Wilkerson: We need some sort of relationship like that between Washington and Beijing today, I think. And I do not mean in any way that we should rule the world together. What I mean is the [ecological & economic collapse consequences of WiP ‘right to breed/consume above ecological carrying capacity limits’ intnl law] challenges like we’re going to confront in the 21st century, challenges that could be [species ending] existential, challenges like climate change, challenges like enough water to drink, enough food to eat, and so forth — I’ve seen some projections that say — by climatologists whose views I respect, that say we could have only arable land and water enough for some half-billion people. What do we do with the other 9 billion? Where do we bury them? How do we deal with that kind of massive change in human relationships with this planet? So these are huge challenges. So what I’m saying is you need this kind of great-power relationship, this great-state relationship to begin to lead the [EoP truth and reconciliation responsible freedom] way for others to follow. – [EoP Amended] The Real News: Reality Asserts Itself with Paul Jay: Lawrence Wilkerson: Who Makes Foreign Policy: If We Remain Predators; the Planet Will Cast us off [SQ Copy].
» EoP Leg Sub: 15 Mar: Req for EoP TRC Info: Timberland: J Swartz; Chiquita: C Flores: Nobel Peace Prize Nomination: Abel TRC Reason Freelancer.
EoP MILED Clerk – on behalf of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants] – Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End the Abel and Kane Cold War strategic and tactical – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior [eop-rh-fr] – recommendations to Commanders in Chief of NATO, Red Army and People’s Liberation Army [lj-v-ls] is to form an EoP Axis [eop-axis] alliance to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law, via EoP UN Resolution [PDF pp.25-66/70: eop-un-res]; to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation by (a) requiring all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizing all property and providing all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) cultural law self rule homelands for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future. With regard to military/national/public service: The implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law would allow for orderly and humane abolition of tax funded standing armies and political representatives to be replaced by responsible freedom citizen militia and political representatives. Sincere peacenik / honourable warrior citizens can sign their unconditional or conditional cooperator EoP Axis Oaths [eop-axis-oath] to provide their Heads of State with an EoP Axis Alliance: EoP UN Resolution mandate.
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 Feb: Notice to IA Sec of State: Re: RU Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Definition Offer: Iowa Secretary of State: Pro Se Filing Notice: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate [PDF.pp.24]: Annexure: E1ac [PDF: pp.16] E1c: 03 Dec: McVeigh2020 TN to US Pres Cand. EoP Re: Nat Comm on Mil, Natl & Pub Svc Enq.
FSB Director General Alexander Bortnikov’s EoP Truth and Reconciliation to End Abel and Kane Cold War [Clarkson or Exactly–TN: Endgame: Journey] negotiations preliminary offer on behalf of President Vladimir Putin and Russian Supreme Court: Chief Justice: Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Lebedev; to President Donald Trump, US Senate and Congress; via SCOTUS: Chief Justice: John Roberts: FSB Message: If Donald Trump and Jared Kushner sincerely want an End Abel and Kane Cold War Peace Deal of Century: FSB / GRU / Kremlin preliminary offer: Consent to EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] Denuclearization Definition [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.38/70].
» EoP Leg Sub: 02 Feb: EoP Int: Kremlin Consent to EoP UN Resolution Denuke Definition Offer.
Transparency Notification of EoP Int: Kremlin Consent to EoP UN Resolution Denuke Definition Offer – which occurred on the 30th anniversary of Apartheid SA President FW de Klerk’s 02 Feb 1990 End of Apartheid speech to Parliament; which resulted in Post-Apartheid South Africa shutting down its Nuclear Weapons program.
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 Feb: Notice to IA Sec of State: Re: RU Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Definition Offer; 02 Feb: TN: LJvFWdK/SGMC: EoP Int: Kremlin – Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Defn – Offer.
The EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War Pro Se Amicus submitted – with consent from SA Concourt Justices [PDF] – to the South African Constitutional Court in CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm] argued that South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was negligent and/or a fraud, denying both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict.
» EoP Leg Sub: 03 May: 03 May: Concourt Justices Order: Citizen v McBride: Lara Johnstone admitted as Amicus Curiae; 18 Sep: Court Filing: LJ v Speaker: George Council & Four Others; 09 Nov: EoP Re: eNCA: Springbok support questioned.
Occidental Hotel: Aleksandr Semyonovich Feklisov aka Aleksandr Fomin: How can my government know that this is a serious and valid proposal?. John Scali: You may say that if Ambassador Stevenson pursues this approach in the United Nations, our Ambassador Soren will be most receptive. – Peter Jennings: The Missiles of October (1992).
» EoP Leg Sub: 15 May: EoP Answer to David Q: Masonic War is Peace Question; 31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP UN Resolution negotiations.
McVeigh 2020 / EoP culture re Questions:
Grab an Able Reason Ego Ready Room Death Panel Rock: Draw a Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior Ecocide Footprint Line
Marcus Luttrell: I was in bad shape, I was dying and I didn’t know what to do. I was lying against this tree and looking at the moon and feeling sorry for myself. I lay there and said you are being a bitch, get up, lets go. What was I going to do, lay down there and die? I was thinking I am still alive, so the mission is still on, lets go. So I reached out and I grabbed a rock, and I reached out as far as I could and I drew a line with it in infront of me. I said I am going to crawl to that line, if my feet hit it, and I am still alive, I am going to do it again. I did that for seven miles. ………. Gen James Cartwright: The speed of informing someone, of bringing key relevant information was so much quicker in a brutal no rank ready room, the downside that we have found is extremely small, the upsides are the intellectual capital, the speed to which you gain information; and context for decisions, and planning and execution. I have not found anything that comes even close. If you decide to enter into a conversation as a senior person, in at least rank, you can be globally stupid, and you can do it very quickly and if that bothers you, then you are going to have to toughen up the hide. In the military structure, that is something that is a paradigm shift. But if you can’t stand being globally stupid once in a while, this is not the space for you. – Lone Survivor: Trailer: Marcus Luttrell: Draw a Line; BizofGov: US Strategic Command: Gen James Cartwright 01.02.03.
» EoP Leg Sub: 20 Dec: McVeigh2020: Rep Dingell & Sen Graham: EoP Axis – If Hitler Invaded Hell – Q; 22 Mar: McVeigh 2020: EoP v WiP Law Re: Covid-19 Death Panels; IG: 17-08-05_genjcartwright-perfectinformation.
EoP MILED Clerk does not require a formal – service by a sheriff – legal process for any request for information. An email with questions, or for a request for particular information or evidence is sufficient. All emails with a request for information – irrespective of the race, class, religion, gender of the author, or the size of their country, or whether they have zero police wo/men, or nuclear weapons – are given the benefit of the doubt that they are an honourable request for information and responded to in accordance with EoP Ego/Eco literacy [ego-eco-literacy] communication policy. No lawyers or Sheriffs or Judges required to get a buck stops here [eop-rh-cult-info.tygae.org.za] answer to any question. EoP Responsible Freedom represents ‘walk our sincere peacenik talk’ path towards smallest government in the world. When every citizen in a nation is a responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za] citizen aka volunteer citizen militia / sheriff: Babylon Masonic War is Peace factory farm slaughterhouse [Obama Deception: False WiP Left Right paradigm; Stefan Molyneux: The Story of [WiP] Enslavement; Human Farming: Our Enslavement; PETA: Sunny Acre Farms; ELS Ref] government is effectively abolished.
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Mar: EoP Re NZ Police Req to Kiwifarms re 15 Mar Christchurch Mosque attack
EoP/OKC TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529
Pub: 20 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options: Defining Enemy.
TO: IJR: Stanley Henkeman
CC: IJR: Charles Villa-Vicencio
CC: Tim Murithi, Jan Hofmeyr, Felicity Harrison, Ric Amansure
CC: Desmond Tutu, Mpho Tutu van Furth, DLTLF, Tutu HIV Fnd, Elders:
CC: Donald Rumsfeld, James Mattis
Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options.
Re EoP Response [18 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options] your 18 June 2020 email [18 Jun: IJR-SH Re LJ Re CCMA-MM&VG: 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options] in response to LJ v TRC negotiations email [17 Jun: LJ Re CCMA-MM&VG: 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options].
IJR-SH: The IJR is an NGO that was started by Professor Charles Villa-Vicencio and was never intended nor acted as a continuation of the TRC.
EoP-LJ: In what way do you mean IJR and the TRC are strategically or tactically different in terms of your reconciliation goals and/or work? Does the IJR have a different definition for reconciliation – an act of reconciling, as when former enemies agree to an amicable truce – than the TRC?
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options.
* an act of reconciling, as when former enemies agree to an amicable truce.
* the state of being reconciled, as when someone becomes resigned to something not desired.
* the process of making consistent or compatible.
reconcile verb (used with object), rec·on·ciled, rec·on·cil·ing.
* to cause (a person) to accept or be resigned to something not desired:
* to win over to friendliness; cause to become amicable:
* to compose or settle (a quarrel, dispute, etc.).
* to bring into agreement or harmony; make compatible or consistent:
If you are in general agreement with the reconciliation definition – the act of reconciling, as when former enemies agree to an amicable truce – then the process of reconciling means (a) defining the enemy; (b) talking to the enemy to find win-win cooperation compromise resolution of the issues in dispute.
[Donald Rumsfeld] Today we lack [[scientific legal definition]] metrics to know if we are winning or losing the global war on terror. Have we fashioned the right mix of rewards, amnesty, protection, and confidence in the US? Are the changes we have and are making too modest and incremental? My impression is that we have not yet made truly bold moves, although we have made many sensible, logical moves in the right direction, but are they enough? Do we need a new organization? Is our current situation such that “the harder we work, the behinder we get” ? – [[EoP Amended]] Donald Rumsfeld: 26 January 2015
» IG: 15-02-12_drumsfeld-globalwaronterrormetricsq.
[Avi Dicther: Head of Shinbet: 200-2006] As someone who knows the Palestinians well, I claim that there should be no problem building a system of trust with them, a genuine one. [Carmi Gillon: Head of Shinbet: 1994-1996] For Israel, its too much of a luxury not to speak with our enemies. As long as they decide not to speak, I have no choice, but when we decide not to speak. I think we’re making a mistake. [Avrahom Shalom: Head of Shinbet: 1980-1986] Its a trait of a professional intelligence service operative to talk to everyone. Things get clarified. I see you don’t eat glass. He sees I don’t drink petrol. Thats how it is. – ABC-AU: The Gatekeepers: Israel’s Shinbet spy leaders call for peace.
[Mike Flynn] “I think what I’m saying is that the strategy that we’ve had is not — is not working. I mean, it’s clearly not working. Just look at the kinds of things we’re facing. I mean, I — you know, in my — in my world, what I have grown up to have to do is define the enemy that we are facing. Like I said, if you — you can’t defeat an enemy that you don’t admit exists and I think that we have to clearly define what the enemy is. That’s number one.” – Lt Gen Michael Flynn; Fox: ‘You Can’t Defeat An Enemy You Don’t Admit Exists’: Obama’s Former DIA Chief: US Strategy To Fight Terrorism ‘Clearly Not Working.’
» IG: 16-09-08_mflynndefineenemy.
Lucky decided to use the Brooklyn gangsters in a bold new venture: The Syndicate. The Syndicate was a nationwide organization that brought together various criminal elements from major cities, across the United States, predominantly on the East Coast. The driving force behind the Syndicate was a sicilian mobster from Manhattan, Charles Lucky Luciano. He was the man who was strong enough to bring in the bosses from New York and then the bosses from the rest of the country and explain to them that cooperation rather than competition, was in their best interests. Until then disputes between gangs were usually settled with violence, bullets and bombings. It was almost punk warfare and there was no real arbitrator about what would happen. It was about who was the toughest and the meanest and had the best gunslingers. In 1934 New Yorks top mobsters held a summit and agreed that gang warfare had to stop. They realized that the pie they had been fighting over for many years was actually large enough, that sharing it, was more beneficial than fighting over it.. The syndicate became a cooperative, with a national board of directors. Chosen to sit on the so-called Board of Directors were Lucky Luciano and Buckalter along with six top mobsters from the east coast. – Organized Crime Channel: Murder Inc. – The Mafia’s Own Murder Incorporated | Luciano Lansky & Siegel; National Crime Syndicate: Who Were Murder Inc?.
» IG: 17-10-11_murderinc-nashequilibrium-bmind
[Vladimir Lenin & Leon Trotsky] VL: It is not the style which bothers me, I think its too soft. LT: I don’t understand. VL: Alright, how do we achieve this future that you are talking about? LT: By struggle, how else? VL: But against who? LT: The state and the classes whose interests it protects. VL: The duty of the revolutionary is to fight those forces and personalities which impede or obstruct the socialist revolution. LT: Thats what I said. VL: No it isn’t what you said, and you must see the difference. The future is less than six months away; and we make the future with every new theory we evolve, every organizational change we set in progress. There will be no revolution. Millions will not be mobilized against the Tsar estate unless we make it possible. We are marxists. We understand as the anarchists and liberals cannot the nature of power, the state and so on. But it is not enough to know the world, we must learn how to change it, and in order to do that, we must first and foremost build an organization. A party to develop the theory and lead the revolutionary struggle. You see what I mean. Objectively the enemy can be your best friend, your lover, your party colleague, the party chairman of your local branch, the editor of your party journal. The enemy is he who impedes the course of the revolution. Comrade Trotsky, the battle for now is not with the Czar, it is with ourselves. – Fall of Eagles: 06: Absolute Beginners: Lenin and Trotsky in London.
» EoP Leg Sub: 22 Apr: The question is no longer whether Revolution, but how and when and led by whom.
Defining the Enemy: Whom should the military kill?:
Mattis stated in an interview with the author of the Mattis Way of War case study that if he could outfight the enemy commander; he wouldn’t have to fight his troops. [Military History Visualized: General Mattis’ Way of War (2001 – 2003)]. In the context of outfighting the enemy commander, which is – if you are an honourable warrior – always to find a win-win just solution to the resource conflict dispute you are engaged in: I don’t think it matters if the General or Admiral in charge of the troops has a vagina [Russian Resurrection: Battalion; The Great War: Russia’s New Offensive – The Russian Women’s Battalion of Death; Battle of the Camel: Mohammeds Wife Aisha] or a penis, or both or none, if the General or Admiral’s ego’s are capable of confronting Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles. In that context, the only operative question for such military commander’s honourable discussion, between themselves and with their troops; is: Whom should the military kill? Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural intnl-law answer: Everyone convicted of an intentional procreation, consumption or deception crime of aggression [PDF: crime-of-aggression]; who refuses to cooperate to implement – and/or once implemented – abide by EoP Scientific and Cultural law [PDF: eop-scicultlaw] international law.
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 Aug: EoP TRC Info: USCAAF Judge Stucky; US Fed & State Judges.
EoP MILED Clerk definition of Enemy:
Generally speaking if your individual identity is that of conscious or unconscious Babylonian, then your enemy is probably a Babylonian Jew or Babylonian Kike or Babylonian sand nigger, or Babylonian cracker, or Babylonian communist, or Babylonian capitalist, etc, depending on your conscious or unconscious preferred racial / religious / ideological bias.
If you are an EoPeacenik [eop-axis-oath]; then your enemy is (a) the Babylonian War is Peace clauses of international law; that allow individuals who call themselves citizens to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, resulting in resource depletion, and consequent racial, religious, class, national, gender and inter-generational resource conflict; (b) the individuals of any race, religion, class or gender who consicously and intentionally obstruct the abolition of Babylonian War is Peace clauses of international law; and its replacement with Ecology of Peace clauses of international law; requiring all citizens of all races, religions, nations, classes and genders to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits, and relate in terms of fully informed consenting agreements. [Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF]
» EoP Leg Sub: 13 Jan: EoP Re: John Kaminski: Who exactly is the enemy here?; 22 Jan: EoP Apps: Draft: Withdrawal Notice Re: Duty to Warn Psych v Donald Trump..
There is not one person of any race, religion, ideology – irrespective of how extreme WiP left or right – class – whether oligarchs or homeless – or gender; who can say ‘EoP MILED Clerk refused to speak to me; refused to actively listen [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle: 9 min] to my request for help, refused to answer my questions, etc’. If I was able to help them, I did. If I was not able to help them, I did not waste their time and resources pretending that I could help them.
Obedience Consciousness & Enemy Definitions:
Robert McElvaine says that men generally seek to avoid a single standard of human behaviour and achievement. I don’t know if he is right or not, men have been involved in much of the creation of the global legal structure that is built upon definitions, which are a form of single standard metric measurement. .
Because men cannot compete with women’s capabilities in the crucial realms of reproduction and nourishing offspring, McElvaine argues, men generally seek to avoid a single standard of human behavior and achievement. They create separate definitions of “manliness” which are based on a false opposition to “womanliness.” A “real man” has been seen in most cultures as “notawoman.” – Amazon: Robert McElvaine: Eve’s Seed: Biology, the Sexes and the Course of History; Wikipedia: Eve’s Seed.
Aisha Ahmad appears to say that Arabian women prefer single simple and clear standard rules, even if they don’t like those rules, but if they understand the rules then they can protect themselves and their families survival; by obeying the rules.
“I can see the price of war on every single one of the price tags in the bazaar. … There’s a moment where you fear in your body that any rules are better than no rules. If you have complete anarchy and no one is constrained in any way, then there’s nothing I can really do to protect myself. But if there’s a system of rules, even if I don’t like the rules, that at least I can think, how can I play by them so that I can keep myself alive.” – Aisha Ahmad; CBC Radio: Follow the money to understand why Islamist groups succeed, says Jihad & Co author
» IG: 17-10-27_eopvwip-rulespollution
Stanley Milgram obedience studies found no difference between biological genders in terms of their obedience and disobedience to what they subjectively considered unjust laws or orders [Brian Burak: Milgram Experiment; HeroicImaginationTV: Stanley Milgram: Obedience to Authority].
Some people define ‘alpha male’ as male logic based on reason; and ‘beta’ as female’ logic based on emotion. Others define alphas as ego-emotional individuals who rely on masculine brute force to demand tribal rules obedience, and betas as individuals who do not rely on masculine brute force; but rely on persuasion and cooperation to achieve tribal rules obedience. History shows that alpha masculine brute force leadership is not always militarily and socio-culturally successful for the racial, religious, class or gender tribes they lead.
Gimbutas noted the stable Aryan population, that a village founded in 8000 BC was still a village 4000BC. This also allowed them to sustainably farm the land. And live in peace. Nobody was ripping off others to feed the kids he sired. …….. Dr. Paul Ekman started out studying monkey facial expressions, aware they cant lie, so the response to fear, surprise, joy, or whatever could be carefully itemized facial muscle movement. Examining the faces of people telling lies shows the full set is lacking; liars learn just enuf facial control to get by. There are other muscle movements, like with monkeys, that are autonomic; ie, they cannot be controlled. paulekman.com sells a CD to show you the diff. Witches and grandmothers picked up on it, also part of our hominid evolution, where the females need to read the face of the alpha male to know when he’ll strike out, and get the fuck out of his way. He dont have the problem, never cared what their faces told. So- again, the witches and midwives breed the men whose faces they can read, which is easier if the face is pale. So, what did that do to the usual expectation of genetic displacement or assimilation? Thus, the criteria of which men will remain in the gene pool is so different, that just because we see more of a given haplotype does not mean a massive invasion. ……… Primate video gives us the term “alpha male” to refer to those who inflict all the serious damage. DNA shows alphas sire alpha sons. They see the beta males place themselves between the alpha and the vulnerable young & females for alphas are impulsively aggressive. With the invention of the bronze axe, couples could homestead in the vast European forests. But if an alpha does not have a beta for his impulse, why then the wife and kids’ll do. Hence the peace of yeoman farmers who are all betas. …………. Surprising given the history of European warfare. But a closer look shows a diff with other regions, where entire populations, like Jonah in Canaan, butchering everyone but the girls kept for sex slaves. Wars in Europe were aristocratic conflicts with the serfs seen as livestock, to serve new masters. When Trajan hauled the Jews to Rome, he only took the educated elite, leaving the ancestors of the Palestinians to serve new Roman masters. This is detected in the Aryan diaspora of 4000 BC. there is no rubble of burnt cities or villages. It was all, somewhat systematically, abandoned. Vitelli, ‘The Celts’ notes the first Celtic Hill forts dont show up until 500 years later. Barford, ‘The Early Slavs’ suggest why noting how they started out in a pioneer homestead system of dispersal in the great forests, no more than one log cabin/sq km hidden away. In defacto quarantine. Any organized army on the move soon got exposed to contagion and wiped out. The natural aggression and violence of alpha males, so common everywhere else, got filtered out of the European gene pool. ……… We read white skin is a rather recent mutation. But since Aryans didnt have marriage, the witches were able to select only the most manageable men for breeding. Of course, some monsters wear white skin, but we know genetics always has throwbacks. Aryan military success never needed the same number of violent warriors when there were so many peaceful, productive, and innovative men crafting improvements in armor, weapons, and tactics. Clausewitz, for one, notably gets into what we now call ‘logistics’ as critical for success. Like beta clerks counting the hay wagons to make sure there was enuf for the horses hauling canon. …. We love the smell of new mown hay. We even enjoy mowing the lawn and then looking back with the same eye on the mown field. We dont eat hay, but it was the gas for the original horsepower, and anything that aids in stocking up gratifies Aryan instincts. Much of what Clausewitz had to say “On War” has to do with making sure the horses had the hay to haul the canons, which allowed Frederich the Great to be the firstest with the mostest time and again. The Junkers were originally all yeoman farmers and knew how to make damn sure there was enuf hay. Aryan political leaders once proved their competence in the field with a Scythe, as if he could harvest enemies just like Death. Men with Scythes organized lines, 6ft from each man to the next, to sweep across a field cutting it all at the same time, scythes swinging in unison like a huge machine to get it all cut, dried, raked, and stacked before the next rain. If you could not get it all done, it was better to let it wait til after the rain. This same instinct to organize was used with swords & shields, and the Greeks all got how it mowed down Persians like a weed eater. But you needed men who instinctively liked, and knew, how to make teamwork get the job done – Proto Indo-European: 02 July 2017; 03 January 2017; 23 January 2017; 15 December 2015; 17 June 2015. 31 Oct 2014; 18 March 2016.
» SQSwans: Day Brown: 02 Jul 2017; 03 Jan 2017.
Nestar Russell and Annette Bolton research appears to indicate that – generally speaking – a significant majority of the 1% global elite of all genders; object to clear and simple global single standard of international laws rules; and the 98% will obey a single standard system of rules, even if they don’t particularly like some of those rules.
97.5 % of normal people, prefer to obey ethical laws: Nestar Russell and Annette Bolton: Awareness of impending climate catastrophe has greatly increased over the last 30 years. Increasing awareness, however, has not translated into decreasing but instead increasing greenhouse gas emissions. …… Interestingly, as illustrated by Milgram’s previously mentioned Subject Free to Choose Shock Level condition, when ordinary people at the end of an organisational chain (e.g., consumers) are aware of the harmful consequences of their actions and they are then offered the unimpeded option to act ethically, 97.5 per cent chose to do so. As long as their self-interests are not too heavily compromised by manipulative up-stream meddling, Milgram’s research clearly illustrates that most people prefer to pursue what they understand to be the morally right course of action. Thus, perhaps more than any other factor, our present inability to avert climate catastrophe is largely an abuse of (mostly higher) power and a total failure of leadership. The fish rots from the head down. – MPDI: “Climate Catastrophe and Stanley Milgram’s Electric Shock “Obedience” Experiments: An Uncanny Analogy” [PDF].
» EoP Leg Sub: 23 Feb: EoP Objective Honesty Errors in JP Morgan ‘Risky Business’ Climate Report.
So the focus of EoP MILED Clerk on behalf of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants] is (a) finding out whether there are sufficient numbers of the 02% elite who have no objections to the EoP Scientific and Cultural law single standard of scientific procreation, consumption and cultural honesty relating standard laws; and do not object to them being submitted to UN General Assembly for voting into international law; (b) if any 2% elite have objections: whether those objections are scientific or cultural; and whether the parties filing the objections are interested in truthseeking evidentiary enquiry to ascertain the in/accuracy of their scientific and/or cultural objections. If any 2% elite’s scientific or cultural law objections to EoP SciCult law are accurate, then EoP SciCult law can be amended to remove such errors.
Some individuals and/or groups of individuals who consider themselves enemies want to be reconciled, and some don’t.
If they sincerely want to be reconciled, they will cooperate to define their enemy; and once defined, cooperate by speaking and listening to their enemies, to find a win-win compromise solution to their issue in dispute.
If they do not want to be reconciled with their enemies, they will obstruct defining their enemy; and talking to their enemy; to avoid finding a compromise solution to their issues in dispute.
EoP/OKC TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529
Sent per electronic notice to:
Hill TV: Krystal Ball Saagar Enjeti; Current Affairs: Nathan Robinson:
Current Affairs (firstname.lastname@example.org); Nathan J Robinson (email@example.com); Krystal Ball Saagar Enjeti (firstname.lastname@example.org);
John Bolton: Counsel: Charles Cooper (email@example.com)
U.S. v. Michael T. Flynn: DC 1:17-cr-232:
Brandon van Grack (firstname.lastname@example.org); Dana Boente via John T Gibbs (email@example.com); Lt Gen Michael Flynn (firstname.lastname@example.org); Counsel: Robert Kelner (email@example.com); Stephen Anthony (firstname.lastname@example.org)