* Andrew Kenny, Inst of Race Relations, Daily Friend, Bridge Water Associates, Ray Dalio, Bridgewater Corporate Counsel, Connecticut Attorney General, William Tong, WA State Attorney Generals Office, AG Bob Ferguson, John Hillman, Tienney Milnor, Criminal Justice Training Commission, Sue Rahr
* 28 Jun: McV20: EoP Law Q Re: DF-AK: The Strange Moral History of Slavery
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: EoP v BLM, EoP v Ray Dalio, EoP v TGP Oligarchs, EoP v US Oligarchs, EoP US DoJ / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA: EoP NTE GMRU: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Religion, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2020 12:05 PM
‘Andrew Kenney’; ‘Inst of Race Relations: Daily Friend’
Cc: ‘Bridge Water Associates: Ray Dalio’; ‘Bridgewater Corporate Counsel’; ‘Connecticut Attorney General: William Tong’; ‘AG Legal’; ‘WA State Attorney Generals Office: AG Bob Ferguson’; ‘John Hillman’; ‘Tienney Milnor’; ‘Criminal Justice Training Commission: Sue Rahr’
Subject: EoP Law Q Re: DF-AK: The Strange Moral History of Slavery
TO: Andrew Kenney, IRR: Daily Friend
Re: Daily Friend: The Strange Moral History of Slavery.
CC: WA-AG Bob Ferguson, Ray Dalio, CT-AG William Tong
Ref: 26 Jun: McV20 Re WA-AG B Ferguson: We demand a justice system that works for us. Black Lives Matter.
EoP Law Q Re: DF-AK: The Strange Moral History of Slavery.
[A] Are your and/or Daily Friend editors ‘morality’, ‘slavery’, etc definitions Abel EoP Steppe Aryan law or Kane WiP Babylon law definitions [Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF]?
[B] If EoP Law: Are you a potential unconditional or conditional EoP Axis Alliance cooperator [eop-axis-oath]?
[C] If WiP Law: Are you a negligently unconscious or conscious and intentional WiP Babylonian? If conscious and intentional: apologies for bothering.
Andrew Kenny: A strange moment in the history of slavery happened in 1848. It was a clash between Europe and Africa. The Europeans wanted the Atlantic slave trade to end; the Africans wanted it to continue. In 1833, English Christians, such as William Wilberforce, managed to get slavery outlawed throughout the British Empire. Using brute force, the warships of the Royal Navy intercepted slave ships crossing from West Africa to the Americas and forced them to return their slaves to Africa. The African slave trading nations, who had for centuries prospered from the slave business, were outraged. They sent deputations to London and Paris to complain about abolition. How dare you rich white racist imperialists interfere in our African culture! How dare you end our traditional African business! If “Black Lives Matter” had existed in 1848, would the BLM activists have sided with the white imperialists or the black nations? ….. But our morality now is our morality now, and now we live by it and condemn those who do not. Slavery is evil. It is too late to punish those who benefited from it but we must not honour them. And we must judge all slave traders, Christian and Muslim, black and white, by the same standard. – Daily Friend: The Strange Moral History of Slavery.
William Wilberforce: We have no database where slaves of South Africa’s Babylon Masonic War is Peace factory farm slaughterhouse slavemasters can register themselves as responsible freedom citizens opposing the Babylon Masonic War is Peace factory farm slaughterhouse [Stefan Molyneux: The Story of [WiP] Enslavement; Human Farming: Our Enslavement; PETA: Sunny Acre Farms] slave trade. …. Thaddeus Stevens: How can I hold that all men are created equal when here before me stands, stinking, the moral carcass of the gentleman from Ohio, proof that some men are inferior, endowed by their Maker with dim wits, impermeable to [responsible-freedom] reason, with cold, pallid slime in their veins instead of hot, red blood! You are more [I demand my WiP Intnl law right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits] reptile than [Ego/Eco Literate human] man, George! So low and flat that the foot of man is incapable of crushing you. How dare you? Yet even you, Pendleton, who should have been gibbeted for [breeding / consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits] treason long before today. Even worthless, unworthy you ought to be treated equally before the law! And so again, sir, again and again and again I say, I do not hold with equality in all things, only with equality before the [EoP scientific and cultural law] law. – [EoP Amended] Amazing Grace; Thaddeus Stevens: Lincoln.
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Jun: EoP Draft: Assange: Re: MEGA Database for EoP Land Reform Denuclearization; 12 Jul: Dalio Pittard RF MEGA Notice Re: Prisoner Pardons & Land Reform.
Andrew Nikiforuk: The idea of subjugation is as old as civilization. Ruling classes have oppressed other humans into servitude to meet their wants, since humans first started wielding weapons. We tend to think of slavery as an institution from the past, one that we have matured out of as a species, but as Canadian journalist Andrew Nikifork, the author of Energy Slaves explains we have simply exchanged personal slavery for fossil fuel slavery. With as many as a 150 fossil fuel slaves running around the average US household we live a lifestyle radically better than even kings and queens of old, and rely on this complex system of support for most everyday chores. Whereas slavery was about the abuse of humans, energy slaves today are being used to abuse ecosystems: oceans, lakes, the atmosphere. So the big fundamental question for us as a species is: How do we use energy? The answer: Badly, we get obsesses with power. The question then becomes how many energy slaves do we actually need and what shall we use them for and what energy sources shall be fueling them? We use energy slaves the same way the Romans, Babylonians, Mayans used human slaves: to grow crops, provide entertainment, transport us by moving us around. The Romans had a slave to remember the names of important people as you walk down the street, just like today you have a Blackberry. Roman slaves did rebel. Romans responded to slave revolts like Spartacus, in the same way that we respond to an oil price shock. The Romans crucified slaves that rebelled, which is why there weren’t very many of them. The Romans did not tolerate public discussion about the abolition of slavery, they even called their slaves ‘speaking tools’. Societies that have cheap access to energy in the form of slaves, makes the society dumb. Expensive energy makes you smarter, because stuff is not easy to do. The Romans had a Military Slave Complex, just like we have a Military Industrial Complex. So the abolition question then becomes: How many slaves do you need? The abolitionists answers were none. A free man must work on his own, work with the energy afforded by his family and/or community. What happens to you as a human being, when you deploy so many energy slaves that you change the character of your family, community and ecosystems, cutting down forests, polluting rivers, depleting fisheries, changing the very energy balance in the atmosphere itself? Those are the moral issues of our times that we have trouble even putting in moral terms. The abolitionists did that. That is why we need the equivalent of a new abolition movement that asks: How should we be using fossil fuels, what should we be feeding them to? How do we discard our state of servitude to fossil fuels and become human beings that are independent and self sufficient again? – SQ-XEN: Andrew Nikiforuk: The Energy of Slaves.
Ray Dalio: With racial prejudice, protests and riots arising from the murder of George Floyd, and attempts to maintain law and order grabbing headlines, I was asked, and feel a compelling need, to share my thoughts about what’s going on. To me this confluence of events—i.e., racial prejudice, protests, riots, and attempts to maintain law and order—is “another one of those” in that it has come and gone many times .. I am old enough to vividly remember the ‘65 Watts, 67 Newark, 68 MLKing, 92 Rodney King 2015 Freddie Gray race riots. So, this is an issue that flares up, passes, and then slips from national focus without resolution. Typically lots of important people make politically correct statements expressing outrage and expressing sympathy and, when the moment passes, go back to their usual ways. You are hearing a lot of these statements now. One might ask “where were all these passionately concerned people a week ago and where will they be a month from now?” Will this moment be sustained to produce real change? Probably not. History suggests to me that the problem only gets attention when it’s raised in this terrible way and then it gets neglected. …. Generally speaking, the [WiP law] media doesn’t help because it sensationalizes, distorts the truth, and picks sides in the fights (e.g. between [WiP law] left and right) and screams supporting [WiP law] opinions at their audiences to demonize the other side. There is little thoughtful disagreement to get at what’s true and what to do about it. – [EoP Amended] Ray Dalio: My Stream of Consciousness Thoughts About What’s Going On.
» EoP Leg Sub: 06 Jun: Q: What is BLM, GWB MNPD EoP or WiP law absolute truth definition?
EoP MILED Clerk: As of date the only – white or black – South Africans who have not ignored my sincere racial, religious, class and gender truth and reconciliation legal advocacy – that would abolish all Babylon Kane Cold War coerced slave / cheap labour – were a few judges. I ain’t got a race / religious / class / gender relations chip on my shoulder. Put differently I ain’t got a problem discussing the issue of slavery scientifically, and putting forward scientific legal solutions to abolish all coerced slavery / cheap labour. If a scientific discussion as to the root legal causes of coerced slavery and/or cheap labour, and legal solutions to abolish the legal root causes of coerced slave / cheap labour is of interest: The essence of any and every society based upon Babylon War is Peace law includes the use of coerced – by negligently or intentionally denying select groups of beings in the society access to a property ration upon which they can live a self sufficient life that does not coerce them to look for slave or cheap labour employment in order to survive.
» EoP Leg Sub: 28 Feb: McV20 Re: CW Rush: Just think where your family would be with 400 years free labour.
The Ngcobo [Wikipedia: Sandile Ngcobo] Concourt did allow me to file an EoP Law ProSe Amicus. The Mogoeng [Wikipedia: Mogoeng Mogoeng] Concourt have not accepted EoP law Pro Se applications. The Mogoeng Judicial Service Commission have not yet responded to EoP law request for an EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures court Judge, to rule upon EoP law citizens applications when in dispute with WiP law lawyers, judges or citizens [09 Nov: LJ v CRLRC: EoP Applicant Statement to Judicial Service Commission: Request EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures Judge].
» EoP Leg Sub: 13 Jun: McV20: EoP Law Q for New Nation Movement & People’s Dialogue.
The EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War Pro Se Amicus submitted – with consent from [Ngcobo] SA Concourt Justices [PDF] – to the South African Constitutional Court in CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm] argued that South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was negligent and/or a fraud, denying both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict.
» EoP Leg Sub: 03 May: 03 May: Concourt Justices Order: Citizen v McBride: Lara Johnstone admitted as Amicus Curiae; 18 Sep: Court Filing: LJ v Speaker: George Council & Four Others; 09 Nov: EoP Re: eNCA: Springbok support questioned.
Robert McElvaine says that men generally seek to avoid a single standard of human behaviour and achievement. I don’t know if he is right or not, men have been involved in much of the creation of the global legal structure that is built upon definitions, which are a form of single standard metric measurement.
Robert McElvaine: Because men cannot compete with women’s capabilities in the crucial realms of reproduction and nourishing offspring, McElvaine argues, men generally seek to avoid a single standard of human behavior and achievement. They create separate definitions of “manliness” which are based on a false opposition to “womanliness.” A “real man” has been seen in most cultures as “notawoman.” – Amazon: Robert McElvaine: Eve’s Seed: Biology, the Sexes and the Course of History; Wikipedia: Eve’s Seed.
Aisha Ahmad appears to say that Arabian women prefer single simple and clear standard rules, even if they don’t like those rules, but if they understand the rules then they can protect themselves and their families survival; by obeying the rules.
Aisha Ahmad: I can see the price of war on every single one of the price tags in the bazaar. … There’s a moment where you fear in your body that any rules are better than no rules. If you have complete anarchy and no one is constrained in any way, then there’s nothing I can really do to protect myself. But if there’s a system of rules, even if I don’t like the rules, that at least I can think, how can I play by them so that I can keep myself alive. – CBC Radio: Follow the money to understand why Islamist groups succeed, says Jihad & Co author [IG: 17-10-27_eopvwip-rulespollution]
» EoP Leg Sub: 20 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options: Defining Enemy;
Its worth repeating that Mother Natures laws do set a single – procreation and consumption below ecological carrying capacity limits – standard [eop-footprint: mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.40-43/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.39-42/70] for resource abundance prosperity; for the inhabitants of any ecological system.
» EoP Leg Sub: 24 Jun: McV20: EoP Law Re: TAC: Here Come the Bourgeoisie Bolsheviks.
No – Anglo Boer War, Slavery, Apartheid, WWI, WWII, Dachau, Dresden, Farm Murder, Climate Change Bush Fire, etc – Death Certificate Says: Died from Resource Conflict Symptoms of Babylon WiP international law [Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF].……. David Griggs: You can say you don’t believe in gravity, but the apple is still going to hit you on the head. You can say you don’t believe in climate change, but you can’t stop it from getting hotter. Allot of people will suffer and alot of people will die. The problem is nobody’s death certificate will say ‘This person died of climate change’. They will say ‘They died of heat stress, or cardiac arrest or they died in a bush fire’ – Understanding Climate Change: Four Climate Scientists and Their Fears of the Future.
» EoP Leg Sub: 26 Jul: The EoP John Brown – how to get along without overbreeding / consuming / deceiving – Question is: What is a Sustainable Procreation and Consumption footprint?.
“If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t understand it well enough.” – Albert Einstein
“Define your terms, you will permit me again to say,” wrote Voltaire, “or we shall never understand one another.” – Counterpunch: “Nuance” in Politics and Public Policy? No Thanks.
» EoP Leg Sub: 23 Aug: EoP Re: Thomas Knapp: Nuance in Politics and Public Policy? No Thanks; 30 Sep: EoP Re: Scientists Warning Wiki: Anti Greta Propaganda; 21 Jun: McV20: EoP Law Re: BLM Defund Police Tactics, Sheriff Higgins to Antifa..
Are your and/or Daily Friend editors ‘morality’, ‘slavery’, etc definitions Abel EoP Steppe Aryan law or Kane WiP Babylon law definitions [Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF]? If Kane Babylon law definitions are they unconscious and negligent or conscious and intentional Babylon WiP law definitions?
McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020]: A handshake is a very low cost way of making contracts, but is worthless in a community with lotsa liars. Gimbutas noted the stable – no population & economic consumption growth – Steppe Aryan population: that a low tech agrarian village founded in 8000 BC was still a low tech agrarian village in 4000BC. This also allowed them to sustainably farm the land, and live in peace. There are no steppe Aryan palaces, no prisons, no mental institutions, no homeless, no landless and no unemployed. No harems; they didnt even have marriage, just as the Musou still today. Among whom, rape & murder are so rare they dont have words for it. – SQSwans: Day Brown: Proto Indo-European: 23 January 2017; SQ-DS: The Mosou Matriarchy: Men Live Better where Women are in Charge.
» McVeigh 2020: Return to Eden: EoP – End Civ – UN Resolution.
Polly Higgins: In law we draw a line: you can’t cross here. …. Now we are also looking at ecological law, it is a far more holistic approach. It is an understanding, not just about it being a rights issue but, about it being a duties and responsibilities issue individually and collectively, at state level, at corporate level. Where do we draw the line? Where do we say enough, no more? That is where we create the crime. That is where we criminalise that dangerous [procreation, consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits] industrial activity, the decisions, the individuals who make the [procreation, consumption] decisions. – Polly Higgins: Eradicating Ecocide: Laws and governance to prevent the destruction of our planet; Deep Green Resistance: Derrick Jensen Resistance Radio w/ Polly Higgins – May 6, 2018; Conscious Lawyer: Polly Higgins, Earth lawyer, Stop Ecocide.
» EoP Leg Sub: 11 May: EoP Re: Eco Revolt & Nowhere News Extinction Rebellion Questions; 12 May: EoP TRC Info: Kyle Kulinski: Re: EoP – Property Ration Healthcare – UN Resolution; 01 Sep: Status of EoP – Abolish Babylon WiP Ecocide Law – UN Resolution.
Thomas Szasz: Animal kingdom, rule is: eat or be eaten; Human kingdom: define or be defined
Formerly, Americans charged with murder were considered innocent until proven guilty; now they are considered insane until proven sane. To concepts like suicide, homicide, and genocide, we should add semanticide – the murder of language. The deliberate (or quasi-deliberate) misuse of language through hidden metaphor and professional mystification breaks the basic contract between people, namely the tactic agreement on the proper use of words. In the animal kingdom, the rule is: eat or be eaten; in the human kingdom: define or be defined. Man is the animal that speaks. Understanding language is thus the key to understanding man; and the control of language, to the control of man. Hence it is that men struggle not only over territory, food, and raw materials, but today perhaps most of all over language. For to control the Word is to be the Definer: God, king, pope, president, legislator, scientist, psychiatrist, madman – you and me. God defines everything and everyone. The totalitarian leader aspires to similar grandeur. The ordinary person defines some aspects of himself and of a few others. But even the most modest and powerless of men defines something no one else can: his own dreams. And we are all defined, as well: by our genes which shape us; our parents who name us; our society which classifies us; and so on. It has long seemed to me that some of the fundamental problems of psychiatry are really quiet simple: they center around a struggle for definition between the so-called mental patient on the one side and his family, society, and psychiatrist on the other. each party to this contest speaks a different language, whose content and consequences he tries to impose on his adversary. Although the context sometimes looks like a debate, it is actually a bitter fight for survival, and, like all such struggles, it is decided not by logic, but by power. If, as the Old Testament tells us, the First or Original Sin was the knowledge of good and evil, then the knowledge of clear speech was the ‘Second Sin.” At Babel, God punished man for this transgression with the Divine Confusion, and we have been misleading each other ever since. Dr. Thomas Szasz believes that it is this confusion of language that has produced much of the inhumanity, intolerance, and outright stupidity which today affect everything from our politics to our sex lives. – Thomas Szasz: The Second Sin.
» EoP Leg Sub: 22 Jan: D2W Psych v DJT: Summary of EoP Radical Honoursty Psych Info [PDF] .
EoP SciCult Law Acts of Unlawful Morality are Crimes of Aggression:
Ecology of Peace law legal definition of unethical and unlawful moral behaviour is defined as a procreation, consumption and/or deception Crime of Aggression [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.32-34/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.31-33/70].
Important is First, or it isn’t. Honesty is First, or it isn’t Important. Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr: mcv20: PDF: pp.44-48/71] is honesty about objective reality for sincere peaceniks / honourable warriors. Ecology of Peace Scientific Law [eop-scicultlaw: mcv20: PDF: pp.49-52/71] refers to Procreation and Consumption below carrying capacity limits. EoP Footprint [eop-footprint: mcv20: PDF: pp.40-43/71] defines how procreation and consumption carrying capacity limit is measured. EoP Cultural law refers to any racial, religious, gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any EoP scientific laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals. Ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy: mcv20: PDF: pp.36-37/71] clarifies how to engage in and/or measure a fully informed consenting agreement. Individuals Rights and Duties under Scientific & Cultural Law: Property Ration [property-ration: mcv20: PDF: pp.59/71] – guaranteed for life – for all individuals who have signed and abide by their responsible freedom [responsible-freedom: mcv20: PDF: pp.61-62/71] oaths. Crimes of Aggression Violations of Scientific & Cultural Law: Violations of (a) Scientific Law are Procreation or Consumption Crimes of Aggression [crimes-of-aggression: mcv20: PDF: pp.32-34/71]; (b) Cultural Law are Deception Crimes of Aggression. EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw] – based on EoP Footprint [eop-footprint] – is the Ecology of Peace culture’s answer to the EoP John Brown – how to get along without deceiving, overbreeding and overconsuming – Question: What is a Sustainable Procreation and Consumption footprint? EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr] is the recommended objective reality socio-legal cultural frame of orientation process for implementing EoP SciCult law as international law.
» McVeigh 2020: Exploratory Committee.
EoP Scientific Law Procreation and Consumption Crimes of Aggression:
Procreation and consumption crimes of aggression will be adjudicated by EoP Scientific law judges. An EoP Scientific law judge is a judge with an interest in and knowledge of procreation and consumption footprint science: the science of ecological carrying capacity limits. Deception crimes of aggression will be adjudicated by EoP Scientific and/or Cultural law judges, depending on whether the deception crime of aggression allegation; is a violation of EoP Scientific or Cultural law allegation.
EoP Cultural Law Deception Crimes of Aggression:
If the deception crime of aggression is a violation of cultural law, and both the accused and defendant are members of the same culture, then the judges will be members of that particular culture, knowledgeable of the cultural values of the individuals in such culture. An EoP Cultural law judge is a judge with knowledge of EoP Cultural law and the cultural values of one or more racial, religious, class or gender Cultural Law Self Rule Homeland cultures. An EoP Conflict of Cultures Judges is a judge with knowledge of EoP Cultural law and Conflict of Cultural law truthseeking enquiries; which may include bringing together experts from the particular disputing parties cultures, to clarify their fully informed consent relating cultural values. If the accused and defendant are members of different racial, religious, ideological or gender cultures, then the accused and applicant can agree on one conflict of cultures judge, that is not a member of either culture; or three judges, where one is a judge from accused culture, the other from defendants culture, and the final judge is not a member of either cultures, but is a conflict of cultures judge.
EoP SciCult Law: Honest Lives Matter:
EoP culture is an Honest Lives Matter culture.
More specifically: an EoP Axis Alliance Lives Matter:
EoP cultures primary alliance identity is EoP Axis – EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr] Honest Lives – Alliance Identity. Secondary identities may be racial, religious, class or gender.
If your primary identity is your race, religion, class or gender; then EoP Axis Alliance is not an Alliance that you will want to join, or be associated with.
Ecology of Peace cultures definition of objective truth / reality:
Ecology of Peace Functional Interpretation of Objective Reality Transforming the World Constraints for Sincere Peaceniks / Honourable Warriors:
Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr] and EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw] are EoP culture’s functional group shared system of thought and action frame of orientation and object of inter-species relating devotion interpretation of reality for individuals whose object of devotion/values include: (i) honest – race, religious, gender and cultural – relationships; (ii) an ecological carrying capacity based perspective of observable factual social contract reality; and (iii) non-violent cooperative root cause problem solving.
* Objective Factual Reality:
 Earth is not flat.
 Resources are finite.
 When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.
 Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: climate change, mass migration, poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
 The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Babylon Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.
* Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior: Interpretative Reality:
 If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy [ego-eco-literacy] – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate [eop-cooperator] to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw] clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.
» EoP Leg Sub: 16 May: LJ v LS Court Filing: NoM Afd & EoP UN Res [PDF] EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [PDF]; EoP Footprint [PDF]; EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [PDF]
Ecology of Peace cultures definition of subjective truth / reality:
 Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior: Subjective Reality:
 In a Babylon WiP international and national constitutional law polegal system, most subjective reality resource conflict disputes, are symptoms of living in a Babylon WiP international law legal system, that allows procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits, resulting in resource depletion, ecological overshoot and resource conflict.
[11.1] Judges, lawyers, editors, academics, politicians, religious leaders, etc can encourage citizens to focus only on their individual or group racial, religious, class or gender subjective reality resource conflict dispute, totally ignoring the root WiP international law causes of their subjective resource conflict reality; or
[11.2] Judges, lawyers, editors, academics, politicians, religious leaders etc can encourage the individuals to focus on their subjective reality resource conflict dispute, within the context of recognizing their resource conflict dispute, is a symptom of living in a Babylon WiP international law legal system; and cooperatively legally, politically, religiously, academically, etc advocate on behalf of abolishing the root WiP international law cause of all racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict disputes.
 Subjective Reality Summary:
[12.1] Factual Reality is founded upon Facts: what happened, who said what, who did what to whom, how, when and where. We create the world by noticing who, what, when and how via our senses of sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch.
[12.2] Our motives for who we choose to be, and what we choose to do and say — covertly and/or overtly — are a reflection of our cultural subjective – ethnicity, religion and class identity – reality.
[12.3] In any objective and/or subjective reality event or circumstance, interpretive Reality is founded upon the interpretation of concrete facts and/or abstract concepts [SQ-G2G: John Friedlander: Abstract, Concrete, General and Specific Terms].
[12.4] Different interpretations of concrete facts and/or abstract concepts can be quickly resolved with no wasting of time or resources; with ego literacy sincere honest listening and confirming of accuracy or inaccuracy of interpretations [ego-eco-literacy: lj-v-ls: PDF pp.36-37/70].
[12.5] Different interpretations of concrete facts and/or abstract concepts can take forever to resolve with massive wasting of time and resources where individuals lack ego literacy character communication skills; and refuse to answer questions and/or confirm the accuracy or inaccuracy of an interpretation; resulting in negligent and/or malicious misrepresentations and/or misunderstandings, where such misrepresentations and/or misunderstandings then become fodder for more disagreements, and more Babylonian confusion and conflict.
[12.6] Objective and Subjective reality interpretations can be functional or dysfunctional. Cooperative resource sharing interpretations will be considered functional amongst individuals who identify as cooperative resource sharing individuals and considered dysfunctional amongst individuals who identify as competitors. Village idiot interpretations will be considered functional amongst individuals who identify as village idiots, and considered dysfunctional amongst individuals who identify as expert deceivers. Objective and subjective interpretations of reality will be considered functional amongst individuals who value brutal honest sharing of objective and subjective interpretations to reach a collective consciousness truth conclusion; and considered dysfunctional amongst individuals who have do not value brutal honest sharing of objective and subjective interpretations to reach a collective consciousness truth conclusion.
 An individuals subjective reality can either be honestly transparent, or covertly hidden behind a false public relations image management subjective reality.
 Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural international law solution for avoiding subjective reality conflicts with individuals who have strong attachments to a particular racial, religious or cultural value system, is to provide such groups of individuals with Cultural Law Self Rule Homelands [cult-law-self-rule: lj-v-ls: PDF pp.34-35/70]..
» EoP Leg Sub: 09 Nov: LJ Re: Notice: Judicial Service Commission and Judge NC Erasmus: EoP Applicant Statement to Judge Erasmus: Request Written Reasons for Case Dismissal: EoP Applicant Statement to Judicial Service Commission: Request EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures Judge: Case Dismissal Merit Issues in Dispute.
Summary: EoP Axis Alliance.
EoP Law racial, religious, ideological and gender national and global security definition can be summarized as building an EoP Axis [eop-axis] Alliance [30 Nov: EoP Re: National Comm on Military, National and Public Service Enquiry; McVeigh 2020: TN to NATO: 14 Apr McV20 Notice: Defund UN, WB, IMF, NATO] to submit EoP UN Resolution to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70| lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.17-54/56 | lj-v-shoc: PDF: 43-84/88 | lj-v-nmn: PDF: pp.11-76/83| lj-v-trc: PDF: pp.30-71/137] as international law; to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation economic degrowth path to a low tech responsible freedom family farm agrarian economy.
An EoP Axis Alliance nation is a nation whose Head of State – on their own Milgram 2% decision making [Invictus: Dictator; Iron Lady; A Woman Named Golda; The Upright Man; John Brown; Bram Fischer]; or with a Milgram 35% EoP Axis Oath [eop-axis-oath] mandate from cabinet, parliament, judiciary, military and/or civil society [15 Mar: Milgram Two, Eight, Thirty Five & Ninety-Eight % Decision-Makers] – will instruct their UN Ambassador to (a) authorize EoP UN Resolution for submission to UN General Assembly by or before 31 Dec 2020; and/or if already submitted to UN General Assembly by or before 31 Dec 2020 [09 Mar: FilingLetter to Judge Nathan Erasmus: PDF; 16 Apr: CCMA 1063-20: LJ v TRC: Draft Settlement Agreement]; (b) to vote Aye authorizing EoP UN Resolution: EoP Scientific and Cultural law to become international law; at the time of the UN General Assembly – EoP UN Resolution – vote.
EoP Axis Alliance Head of State Legal and Military EoP UN Resolution Mandate Alternatives:
» Judiciary [eop-legcertenq: 21 Apr: DRAFT: Presidents of Russia, China; USA & EU: Joint letter to their Constitutional / Supreme Court Chief Justices. Subject: Re: EoP Axis Truth and Reconciliation to End Abel & Kane Cold War Negotiations; to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law];
» Military [RI: Crimea: 10 Aug: EoP Applicants: Draft: MilDem EoP UN Resolution Martial Law].
Summary: EoP Law – TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War – Axis Alliance negotiations:
The question is whether Ecology of Peace (“EoP”) Scientific and Cultural law [mcv20: PDF: pp.26-67/71; lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] enabling orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation [Reds: Trailer] return to sustainable low tech family farm agrarian economy [NBC: Eustace Conway’s Turtle Island]; or Masonic War is Peace (“WiP”) Babylon law enabling disorderly and inhumane race, religious and class war deindustrialization and depopulation Serbia-Syria-Libya-Iraq slaughterhouse culling [Fox: Lt Col Ralph Peters: In a War you fight to win; JFK: Mr X: 01:02]; should be master intnl law; that’s all. [Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF].
» EoP Leg Sub: 30 Jan: EoP v WiP Law Relevance Defns A: Re JManchin: If its relevant I want to hear it.
Lawrence Wilkerson: We need some sort of relationship like that between Washington and Beijing today, I think. And I do not mean in any way that we should rule the world together. What I mean is the [ecological & economic collapse consequences of WiP ‘right to breed/consume above ecological carrying capacity limits’ intnl law] challenges like we’re going to confront in the 21st century, challenges that could be [species ending] existential, challenges like climate change, challenges like enough water to drink, enough food to eat, and so forth — I’ve seen some projections that say — by climatologists whose views I respect, that say we could have only arable land and water enough for some half-billion people. What do we do with the other 9 billion? Where do we bury them? How do we deal with that kind of massive change in human relationships with this planet? So these are huge challenges. So what I’m saying is you need this kind of great-power relationship, this great-state relationship to begin to lead the [EoP truth and reconciliation responsible freedom] way for others to follow. – [EoP Amended] The Real News: Reality Asserts Itself with Paul Jay: Lawrence Wilkerson: Who Makes Foreign Policy: If We Remain Predators; the Planet Will Cast us off [SQ Copy].
» EoP Leg Sub: 15 Mar: Req for EoP TRC Info: Timberland: J Swartz; Chiquita: C Flores: Nobel Peace Prize Nomination: Abel TRC Reason Freelancer.
EoP MILED Clerk – on behalf of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants] – Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End the Abel and Kane Cold War strategic and tactical – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior [eop-rh-fr] – recommendations to Commanders in Chief of NATO, Red Army and People’s Liberation Army [lj-v-ls] is to form an EoP Axis [eop-axis] alliance to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law as international law, via EoP UN Resolution [PDF pp.25-66/70: eop-un-res]; to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation by (a) requiring all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; (b) nationalizing all property and providing all responsible freedom oath citizens: (i) cultural law self rule homelands for groups with subjective racial, religious & gender identities; and (ii) a property ration to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future. With regard to military/national/public service: The implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law would allow for orderly and humane abolition of tax funded standing armies and political representatives to be replaced by responsible freedom citizen militia and political representatives. Sincere peacenik / honourable warrior citizens can sign their unconditional or conditional cooperator EoP Axis Oaths [eop-axis-oath] to provide their Heads of State with an EoP Axis Alliance: EoP UN Resolution mandate.
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 Feb: Notice to IA Sec of State: Re: RU Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Definition Offer: Iowa Secretary of State: Pro Se Filing Notice: McVeigh 2020: EoP / OKC TRC Return to Steppe Aryan Eden Negotiations: Write In Candidate [PDF.pp.24]: Annexure: E1ac [PDF: pp.16] E1c: 03 Dec: McVeigh2020 TN to US Pres Cand. EoP Re: Nat Comm on Mil, Natl & Pub Svc Enq.
FSB Director General Alexander Bortnikov’s EoP Truth and Reconciliation to End Abel and Kane Cold War [Clarkson or Exactly–TN: Endgame: Journey] negotiations preliminary offer on behalf of President Vladimir Putin and Russian Supreme Court: Chief Justice: Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Lebedev; to President Donald Trump, US Senate and Congress; via SCOTUS: Chief Justice: John Roberts: FSB Message: If Donald Trump and Jared Kushner sincerely want an End Abel and Kane Cold War Peace Deal of Century: FSB / GRU / Kremlin preliminary offer: Consent to EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] Denuclearization Definition [lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.38/70].
» EoP Leg Sub: 02 Feb: EoP Int: Kremlin Consent to EoP UN Resolution Denuke Definition Offer.
Transparency Notification of EoP Int: Kremlin Consent to EoP UN Resolution Denuke Definition Offer – which occurred on the 30th anniversary of Apartheid SA President FW de Klerk’s 02 Feb 1990 End of Apartheid speech to Parliament; which resulted in Post-Apartheid South Africa shutting down its Nuclear Weapons program.
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 Feb: Notice to IA Sec of State: Re: RU Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Definition Offer; 02 Feb: TN: LJvFWdK/SGMC: EoP Int: Kremlin – Consent to EoP UN Res Denuke Defn – Offer.
The EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War Pro Se Amicus submitted – with consent from SA Concourt Justices [PDF] – to the South African Constitutional Court in CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm] argued that South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was negligent and/or a fraud, denying both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict.
» EoP Leg Sub: 03 May: 03 May: Concourt Justices Order: Citizen v McBride: Lara Johnstone admitted as Amicus Curiae; 18 Sep: Court Filing: LJ v Speaker: George Council & Four Others; 09 Nov: EoP Re: eNCA: Springbok support questioned.
Occidental Hotel: Aleksandr Semyonovich Feklisov aka Aleksandr Fomin: How can my government know that this is a serious and valid proposal?. John Scali: You may say that if Ambassador Stevenson pursues this approach in the United Nations, our Ambassador Soren will be most receptive. – Peter Jennings: The Missiles of October (1992).
» EoP Leg Sub: 15 May: EoP Answer to David Q: Masonic War is Peace Question; 31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP UN Resolution negotiations.
McVeigh 2020 / EoP culture re Questions:
Grab an Able Reason Ego Ready Room Death Panel Rock: Draw a Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior Ecocide Footprint Line
Marcus Luttrell: I was in bad shape, I was dying and I didn’t know what to do. I was lying against this tree and looking at the moon and feeling sorry for myself. I lay there and said you are being a bitch, get up, lets go. What was I going to do, lay down there and die? I was thinking I am still alive, so the mission is still on, lets go. So I reached out and I grabbed a rock, and I reached out as far as I could and I drew a line with it in infront of me. I said I am going to crawl to that line, if my feet hit it, and I am still alive, I am going to do it again. I did that for seven miles. ………. Gen James Cartwright: The speed of informing someone, of bringing key relevant information was so much quicker in a brutal no rank ready room, the downside that we have found is extremely small, the upsides are the intellectual capital, the speed to which you gain information; and context for decisions, and planning and execution. I have not found anything that comes even close. If you decide to enter into a conversation as a senior person, in at least rank, you can be globally stupid, and you can do it very quickly and if that bothers you, then you are going to have to toughen up the hide. In the military structure, that is something that is a paradigm shift. But if you can’t stand being globally stupid once in a while, this is not the space for you. – Lone Survivor: Trailer: Marcus Luttrell: Draw a Line; BizofGov: US Strategic Command: Gen James Cartwright 01.02.03.
» EoP Leg Sub: 20 Dec: McVeigh2020: Rep Dingell & Sen Graham: EoP Axis – If Hitler Invaded Hell – Q; 22 Mar: McVeigh 2020: EoP v WiP Law Re: Covid-19 Death Panels; IG: 17-08-05_genjcartwright-perfectinformation.
EoP MILED Clerk does not require a formal – service by a sheriff – legal process for any request for information. An email with questions, or for a request for particular information or evidence is sufficient. All emails with a request for information – irrespective of the race, class, religion, gender of the author, or the size of their country, or whether they have zero police wo/men, or nuclear weapons – are given the benefit of the doubt that they are an honourable request for information and responded to in accordance with EoP Ego/Eco literacy [ego-eco-literacy] communication policy. No lawyers or Sheriffs or Judges required to get a buck stops here [eop-rh-cult-info.tygae.org.za] answer to any question. EoP Responsible Freedom represents ‘walk our sincere peacenik talk’ path towards smallest government in the world. When every citizen in a nation is a responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za] citizen aka volunteer citizen militia / sheriff: Babylon Masonic War is Peace factory farm slaughterhouse [Obama Deception: False WiP Left Right paradigm; Stefan Molyneux: The Story of [WiP] Enslavement; Human Farming: Our Enslavement; PETA: Sunny Acre Farms; ELS Ref] government is effectively abolished.
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Mar: EoP Re NZ Police Req to Kiwifarms re 15 Mar Christchurch Mosque attack
EoP/OKC TRC Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529
Sent per electronic notice to:
Andrew Kenney: Inst of Race Relations: Daily Friend:
(firstname.lastname@example.org); Inst of Race Relations: Daily Friend (email@example.com)
Bridge Water Associates: Ray Dalio:
Bridge Water Associates: Ray Dalio (firstname.lastname@example.org); Bridgewater Corporate Counsel (Corporate_Counsel@bwater.com); Connecticut Attorney General: William Tong (email@example.com); AG Legal (firstname.lastname@example.org);
WA State Attorney Generals Office: AG Bob Ferguson:
WA State Attorney Generals Office: AG Bob Ferguson (email@example.com); John Hillman (firstname.lastname@example.org); Tienney Milnor (email@example.com); Criminal Justice Training Commission: Sue Rahr (firstname.lastname@example.org)