30 Jul: EoP Re WP-GL Re EoP Re WP-W2001 Re: EoP Re: McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page

* Wikipedia, Wikimedia, Geoffrey Lane, Amanda Keton.
* 30 Jul: EoP Re WP-GL Re EoP Re WP-W2001 Re: EoP Re: McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: US v TJ McVeigh  / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: EoP MILED Clerk [mailto:eop.miled.clerk@tygae.org.za]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 5:36 PM
To: ‘Wikipedia Volunteer Response Team: Geoffrey Lane’
Cc: ‘Wikimedia’; ‘Wikimedia Foundation: General Counsel: Amanda Keton’
Subject: Re: [Ticket#2020073010003845] Wham2001 Deletion of EoP McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page.

TO: Wikipedia Volunteer Response Team: Geoffrey Lane
CC: Wikimedia Foundation: General Counsel: Amanda Keton

Geoffrey Lane:

Re: [Ticket#2020073010003845] Wham2001 Deletion of EoP McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page

I received WikiPedia: Geoffrey Lane’s 30 Jul 2020 response [30 Jul: WP-GL Re EoP Re WP-W2001 Re: EoP Re: McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page] to EoP law Truth and Reconciliation to End Abel and Kane Cold War negotiations 30 July 2020 multitasking response to Wham2001 and transparency notification to Wikipedia: Jimmy Wales [30 Jul: EoP Re WP-W2001 Re: EoP Re: McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page].

Thread:
* 28 Jul: EoP McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page.
* 28 Jul: WP-W2001 Re: EoP Re: McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page.
* 28 Jul: EoP Re: McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page.
* 30 Jul: EoP Re WP-W2001 Re: EoP Re: McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page.
* 30 Jul: WP-GL Re EoP Re WP-W2001 Re: EoP Re: McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page.

**

EoP active listening [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle: 9 min] response:

WP-GL: Wikimedia: Geoffrey Lane
EoP-LJ: Ecology of Peace: Lara Johnson

**

WP-GL 01: As a collaborative encyclopedia, Wikipedia is edited by an international group of volunteers without any kind of centralized coordination.

EoP-LJ 01: Thank you for the info.

EoP-LJ 01a: Is Wikipedia an EoP and WiP; or WiP Only [Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF] collaborative encyclopedia?

EoP-LJ 01b: Put differently: In the event that Wikipedia’s internal dispute resolution processes fail between two editors, one of whom is a member of an EoP law culture and the other an unconscious or conscious member of a WiP law culture; does WikiMedia Foundation legal counsel have an EoP v WiP editor dispute court referral policy or not: (A) Is WMF Counsel neutral in terms of whether disputing editors refer the dispute to an EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures Judge/court; or (B) Does WMF Counsel [B1] consent to any EoP v WiP editors referring their to an EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures Judge/court; or (B2) object to EoP v WiP editors referring their dispute to an EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures Judge/court?

EoP-LJ 01c: I am a member of an Ecology of Peace law culture [eop-axis-oath: LJ].

EoP-LJ 01d: EoP culture individuals recognize that entering into an in/accuracy enquiry of any objective or subjective fact/s in dispute with a conscious and intentional – lack of ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy: mcv20: PDF: pp.36-37/71] character – WiP law culture individual to be referred to arbitration before a WiP Law Only Judge/court, is a total waste of time. Under EoP law conscious and intentional deception is a crime of aggression [crimes-of-aggression: mcv20: PDF: pp.32-34/71], the penalty for which is death.

EoP-LJ 01e: EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] is an Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] culture.

**

WP-GL 02: As such, editing does not involve a centralized editing authority. There is no “editor in chief” or specific “editor” to be written to, and no one person (or particular group of persons) empowered to overrule editing decisions made by the editorial community.

EoP-LJ 02: As per EoP-LJ 01.

**

WP-GL 03: As with all Wikipedia content, the article(s) of interest to you are written by a wide range of people working together. Editing takes place within collaboratively-determined rules and policies — not by employees or “staff writers”. The volunteer community as a whole, and not specific people within it, are the body who ultimately decides whether specific content and styles meet the standards of Wikipedia.

EoP-LJ 03: As per EoP-LJ 01.

**

WP-GL 04: Please note that as a result, neither the Wikimedia Foundation nor the email volunteers can or will:

  • delete articles, references, links or images you find unpleasant
  • reinsert articles, references, links or images that you think should be included
  • overrule editorial decisions (unless there is a pressing legal issue, which is not the case in your request)

EoP-LJ 04: As per EoP-LJ 01.

**

WP-GL 05: The only venues for requesting editorial changes are the relevant discussion pages on the site, and the specific “dispute resolution” routes defined by the editorial community for bringing unresolved concerns to the attention of other editors to gain their opinion.

EoP-LJ 05: As per EoP-LJ 01.

**

WP-GL 06: Beyond that there is no other authority by whom article content is dictated. Neither the email team nor the Foundation will unilaterally alter the site or its content based on petitions, chain letters, or any other means of concerted campaigning.

EoP-LJ 06: As per EoP-LJ 01.

**

WP-GL 07: All of that is decided by the editing community in its own on-site discussions.

EoP-LJ 07: As per EoP-LJ 01.

**

WP-GL 08: If you are interested in engaging with our volunteer community to resolve editorial disputes, you are welcome to.

EoP-LJ 08: As per EoP-LJ 01.

**

WP-GL 09: Wikipedia is a “wiki,” which means anyone can edit and no account is required. You may wish to view <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution> for more details.

EoP-LJ 09: Thank you for the Info.

EoP-LJ 09a: I took a look at Wikipedia: Dispute Resolution page, which states:

Wikipedia: Dispute Resolution: This policy describes what to do when you have a dispute with another editor. See Wikipedia:Wikiquette and the essay Staying cool when the editing gets hot for more tips. Also please remember that Wikipedia is not about winning. In our unique Wikipedia context, a dispute raises a couple of questions: “What is to be done next? What is to be learned from this?” The “dispute resolution” sidebar (right) has direct links to filing requests for many of the dispute resolution levels, but requesting dispute resolution involves different guidelines and application processes for each level. Dispute resolution requests can help familiarize you with each of them.

EoP-LJ 09a: As per EoP-LJ 01b: Put differently: In the event that Wikipedia’s internal dispute resolution processes fail between two editors, one of whom is a member of an EoP law culture and the other an unconscious or conscious member of a WiP law culture; does WikiMedia Foundation legal counsel have an EoP v WiP editor dispute court referral policy or not: (A) Is WMF Counsel neutral in terms of whether disputing editors refer the dispute to an EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures Judge/court; or (B) Does WMF Counsel [B1] consent to any EoP v WiP editors referring their to an EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures Judge/court; or (B2) object to EoP v WiP editors referring their dispute to an EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures Judge/court?

**

EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529

Sent per electronic notice to:

Wikipedia: Geoffrey Lane:
Wikipedia Volunteer Response Team: Geoffrey Lane (info-en@wikimedia.org)

Wikimedia Foundation: Amanda Keton:
Wikimedia (info@wikimedia.org); Wikimedia Foundation: General Counsel: Amanda Keton (legal@wikimedia.org)

.

6 Comments

    1. […] Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page. [Geoffrey Lane: Ticket#2020073010003845] * 30 Jul: EoP Re WP-GL Re EoP Re WP-W2001 Re: EoP Re: McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page. [EoP MILED Clerk: […]

    1. […] Re EoP Re WP-W2001 Re: EoP Re: McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page.30 Jul: EoP Re WP-GL Re EoP Re WP-W2001 Re: EoP Re: McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page. [EoP MILED Clerk: […]

    1. […] General Counsel: Amanda KetonCC: American Bar Association: Judy Perry MartinezRef: 30 Jul: EoP Re WP Re: WP Deletion of EoP McVeigh Faked Execution Edits to McVeigh Wikipedia Page; 23 Jun: EoP Law Re: ABA-GSI Invitation to FW de Klerk Re: Mandela Release and Nuclear Shutdown […]

Leave a Comment