25 Sep: McV20 Re JGB Re McV EoP Q to JBrent re: Clugston: Blip: Humanitys Predicament

* Jason Brent
* 25 Sep: McV20 Re JGB Re McV EoP Q to JBrent re: Clugston: Blip: Humanitys Predicament.
» 25 Sep: JGB Re McV20: EoP Q to JBrent re: Clugston: Blip: Humanitys Predicament
» 25 Sep: McV20 Re JGB Re McV EoP Q to JBrent re: Clugston: Blip: Humanitys Predicament.
» 25 Sep: JGB Re McV20: EoP Q to JBrent re: Clugston: Blip: Humanitys Predicament
» 25 Sep: McV20: EoP Q to JBrent re: Clugston: Blip: Humanitys Predicament
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: McVeigh2020, EoP v J Brent / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: McVeigh 2020 Exp Comm [mailto:mcveigh2020@tygae.org.za]
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 10:19 PM
To: ‘Jason Brent’
Subject: EoP Q to JBrent re: Clugston: Blip: Humanitys Predicament

.

JGB: I cannot and will not define intelligent.

EoP-LJ: If you will only answer intelligent questions; and you cannot define ‘intelligent’; then how would you be able to know when a question is intelligent?

If you have a measurable intelligent definition; then you will know when a question is intelligent, you will be able to simply explain what your definition of intelligent is, and you will be able to explain how any particular question is not intelligent, based upon your measurable intelligent definition.

If you have a measurable intelligent definition; the measurable intelligent definition is the master decision maker over the truthseeking discussion enquiry; as to whether you are required to answer the question or not.

If you have no measurable intelligent definition; your ego is the master decision maker as to whether you require yourself to answer any particular question or not.

**

JGB: I will only answer a question I believe requires an answer.

EoP LJ: How do you measure the accuracy of your belief about whether any question requires you to answer the question?

**

JGB: I invite questions that attack what I have written if they provide rational (I will not involved with you about the definition of rational) that my ideas are wrong or are based on false facts.

EoP LJ: Ethical constructive criticism requires knowing a potential opponents strategic goal.

If I don’t know the strategic goal of your ideas, how can I provide honourable constructive criticism as to your analysis of problems obstructing you from accomplishing your strategic goal and/or tactical measures you recommend for accomplishing your strategic goal.

Sun Tzu: If the strategic and/or tactical orders of the military, political or legal general are unclear and the troops do not obey, it is the fault of the general that the troops do not obey. If the strategic and/or tactical orders of the military, political or legal general are clear and the troops do not obey, it is the fault of the subordinate officers and troops for refusing to obey. [History Channel: Sun Tzu – The Art of War]

If I don’t know the strategic goal of your academic general ideas, how can I enlist as an academic soldier to provide you with honourable constructive criticism as to your analysis of problems obstructing you from accomplishing your strategic goal and/or tactical measures you recommend for accomplishing your strategic goal.

EoP Law racial, religious, ideological and – national and global security definition – strategic goal can be summarized as building an EoP Axis [eop-axis] Alliance [30 Nov: EoP Re: National Comm on Military, National and Public Service Enquiry; McVeigh 2020: TN to NATO: 14 Apr McV20 Notice: Defund UN, WB, IMF, NATO] to submit EoP UN Resolution  to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70| lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.17-54/56 | lj-v-shoc: PDF: 43-84/88 | lj-v-nmn: PDF: pp.11-76/83| lj-v-trc: PDF: pp.30-71/137] as international law; to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation economic degrowth path to a low tech responsible freedom family farm agrarian economy.

Responsible Freedom – Conquer Lack of Ego/Eco literacy ignorance – Oath:
EoP oath is a promise – a form of labour or information barter exchange reciprocity [Dmitry Orlov Twilight of the Antipodes] – purchase of labour or information sharing cooperation with very clear unambiguous honest communication as to what the collective strategic goal is. If or when there is a mutual overlap agreement on strategic goal between two or more individuals, they can sign an unconditional or conditional cooperator oath, to clarify their cooperator commitment to the strategic goal. The oath is a process to learn to practice in decision-making, communication and relating responsible freedom self government 24/7/365: If or when my ego gets in the way of me cooperating, towards our strategic goal; I will not run away or play some passive aggressive ego-mindfuck games. I will be my own or your Sgt Major and bitch slap my own or your fragile ego Private through the face with clear sincere verbal feedback, to help quick resolution of our misunderstanding, disagreement with you my fellow Oath co-operator; to enable us to uphold our cooperation agreement towards our shared strategic goal, through potentially difficult times. It’s a statement of: our strategic goal is our cooperative master, not our individual ego’s.
» EoP Leg Sub: 22 Jul: McVeigh2020 Re: Greg Johnson NB Principles; Richard Spencer: Trump WN Congame.

If you don’t share Ecology of Peace strategic goal, that’s quite okay. EoP Axis Alliance army ain’t interested in fake generals or soldiers.

To the extent that Jason Clugston army essay ideas clarify the racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict symptoms of WiP law legal systems is helpful, EoP Axis Alliance will share such information; but in the absence of you answering questions under oath; will not market your essay ideas as legal evidentiary information.

.

Leave a Comment