08 Oct: LJ Upd Re: SIU Request for Q&A Meeting

* SIU, Conrad Lesch, Vladimir Putin, RU-ZA Amb Ilya Rogachev; RU-UN Amb Vasily Nebenzya
* 08 Oct: LJ Upd Re: SIU Request for Q&A Meeting.
» 07 Oct: LJ Re: SIU Request for Q&A Meeting.
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v MoJ, LJ v RU-ZA Amb  / EoP NWO SCO: EoP Applicants | EoP NTE GM: EoP NTE GMRU: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: EoP Axis: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP  Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.

From: Lara Johnson [mailto:eop-leg-sub@tygae.org.za]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2020 12:13 PM
To: ‘SIU: Conrad Lesch’
Cc: ‘Kremlin: President Vladimir Putin via Kremlin Press Office’; ‘FSB: Gen Bortnikov’; ‘RU-US Emb: Anatoly Antonov’; ‘Min of Foreign Affairs: Spokesperson: Maria Zakarova’; ‘RU-ZA Emb: Ilya Igorevich Rogachev’; ‘RU-NL Emb: Alexander Vasilievich Shulgin’; ‘RU-UN Amb Vasily Nebenzya: Fedor Strzhizhovskiy’
Subject: Re: Upd: SIU Request for Q&A Meeting

TO: SIU: Conrad Lesch
CC: President Vladimir Putin

Mr Lesch:

Re: Upd: SIU Request for Q&A Meeting.

Rough draft summary of answers to potential SIU investigation questions:
* Am I guilty of any crime?
* Do I know of anyone else who committed a crime?
* Can NPA monitor EoP TRC Legal Services correspondence?

Edit Update to:
* If NPA intentions are arrest.

Am I guilty of any crime?:

Conscious WiP law mafiocracy police, prosecutors and judges don’t care about evidence.
The chances of a WiP law mafiocracy judge – with suppression and censorship of evidence help from WiP law prosecutors and police – finding me guilty of almost anything, an NPA prosecutor – whether a conscious WiP law NPA prosecutor; or unconscious WiP law NPA prosecutor obeying the orders of some conscious or unconscious WiP law executive, juridical or legislative mafiocracy faction issuing political arrest instructions to the NPA – wants to accuse me of, is quite possible.

If the WiP law prosecutors were honest, the charges would be something to the effect of ‘Black/White/Left/Right Secret Society Supremacist Mafiocracy oligarchy object to accused providing sincere peacenik / honourable warrior [eop-rh-fr] responsible freedom legal services to their duhmockery mafiocracy slaughterhouse cattle farm politician managers and voter cattle’.

[5]  WiP Kane Babylon Mafiocracy’s:
[5.1] Kane Babylon War is Peace (“WiP”) Mafiocracy governments are a symptom of Babylon WiP international law; that allows citizens to procreate and/or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits:
[A] A Babylon WiP Mafiaocracy is an overt – oligarchy, autocracy, etc – or covert – democracy – secular or religious system of government that consciously or unconsciously legislatively enables citizens to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits {eop-footprint}; enabling the WiP Babylon Mafiocracy elite to profit from the resulting – overpopulation / consumption collision with finite resources – resource depletion and racial, religious, class and gender resource conflict misery war economy.
» EoP Leg Sub: 26 Sep: Filing: EoP Law Amicus: Iran v USA; USA v JP Assange: EoP Law Amicus Affidavit in Support of Parties Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation Settlement Agreement Resolution

EoP and WiP law judges do care about evidence.
The chances of an EoP and WiP law judge finding me guilty of anything from contempt of court, to crimen injuria, mental disorders, etc; is zero.

Do I know of anyone else who committed a crime?:

It would depend on what the NPA’s definition of ‘unlawful’ is?  

For example: To the extent that Desmond Tutu and FW de Klerk, Barack Obama and Donald Trump are conscious and intentional WiP law aka fake peaceniks; or obeying the legal services advice of their conscious and intentional WiP law Babylonian [eop-v-wip-law] lawyers; an EoP law sincere peacenik / honourable warrior court; could find them negligently guilty of mass murder far greater than Charles Taylor or PolPot; aka definitely negligently guilty of Crimes of Aggression; and potentially intentionally guilty of Crimes of Aggression [crimes-of-aggression: lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.31-33/70].

If or where I have been informed of information – whether as a result of my own observations, or if shared with me, directly personally or indirectly via media – that indicate possible civil or criminal unlawful – in terms of my knowledge of EoP or WiP law unlawful definitions – behaviour, I have informally or formally, including civil disobedience [state-v-lj] formally; informed civil or criminal authorities; of such information for their investigation.

EoP international law unlawful definitions will be village idiot simple [eop-scicultlaw: lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.48-51/70].

Current WiP international law unlawful definitions are legally complex.
EoP law summary clarification of WiP law complexity for non-lawyers or laypersons [08 Aug: EoP Law Re: Babylon – Innocence for $ale Indulgences – WiP Law: excerpt: EoP v Nobel: eop-v-nobel: Crimes of Aggression Crimes of War Complaint PDF: para 115-143/416; pp.110-114/268].  

Lessons learnt:

If all parties – accused, police, prosecutors, judges – are conscious and intentional Milgram 2-35% [15 Mar: Milgram Two, Eight, Thirty Five & Ninety-Eight % Decision-Makers] WiP law parties; its best for EoP law individuals to mind their own business, and allow conscious and intentional WiP law parties to resolve the matter in terms of their WiP law preferences.  

If one or more parties – judge, or applicant, respondent; or accused, police, prosecutors – are unconscious Milgram 2-35% WiP law parties, and given the opportunity of a free and fair EoP v WiP law conflict resolution vote, such Milgram 2-35%’er/s; would prefer an EoP TRC settlement agreement; or to proceed with EoP and WiP law judge; or to simply accept into the court record that EoP TRC resolution solutions were offered to disputing parties, who declined them; then if I have the time and resources, I will informally or formally inform such parties of the difference between EoP and WiP law [eop-v-wip-law], and possible EoP conflict resolution opportunities [eop-axis-oath mandate for eop-un-res] they may wish to consider; for resolution of their resource conflict dispute.

If NPA intentions are arrest:

If at any time in your investigation; your conscious or unconscious NPA WiP law superiors; or their conscious or unconscious WiP law political mafiocracy superiors; file a WiP law criminal complaint against me, demanding a Judge authorize their request for the issuance of an arrest warrant for my arrest:  

Kindly request your superiors suspend their arrest proceedings pending a ruling in H 51/19: LJ v CRLRC & One Other [28 Jul: LJ Req Judge Hlope Info Re H45-19/18912-19: LJ v CRLRC & One Other: Practice Notice & Heads of Argument & Draft Order: PDF: pp.44; 08 Sep: LJ v EGME Upd Re H45-19/18912-19: LJ v CRLRC & One Other: PDF: pp.67]; authorizing standby counsel for Ecology of Peace culture citizens; and the Legal Practice Council providing a list of SA legal representatives willing to provide standby counsel.

Alternatively: if NPA insist on proceeding with an arrest, without regard for Judge Erasmus, Hlope and/or Judicial Service Commissions’ negligent or intentional denial of standby assistance of counsel representation to myself: Please note my request and authorization to FSB to provide me with immediate psychotronic heart attack or stroke assisted suicide, in the event of arrest by SA law enforcement officials [07 Oct: Ntc: LJ Will to Exec: GFieger; incl FSB Assisted Suicide Authorization: PDF: pp.04].

If NPA want to monitor EoP TRC Legal Services correspondence:

If NPA want to monitor email and/or mail received by EoP MILED Clerk, I have no problem providing you with an affidavit; for NPA to submit to tygae.org.za internet service provider; providing you with such surveillance authority. Any EoP gmail accounts are routed to forward to an EoP TRC tygae.org.za email accounts. However, I can provide you with authority to submit to Google to monitor gmail email accounts, also. Consent for NPA surveillance of any EoP TRC email account; should not be interpreted as EoP MILED Clerk consent for use of NPA surveillance authority to obstruct any electronic correspondence to or from EoP MILED Clerk. NPA objections to the content of any email from EoP MILED Clerk, can be submitted per email to EoP MILED Clerk, clarifying NPA’s objections. If NPA objections are evidentiary valid, EoP MILED Clerk will apologize, withdraw and/or edit the particular statement.

EoP MILED Clerk does and will object to the appointment of any legal services representative; demanding confidentiality attorney-client privileges.

EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]

Respectfully,

Lara Johnson,
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529

Sent per electronic notice to:

SIU: Conrad Lesch:
SIU: Conrad Lesch (clesch@siu.org.za)

RU Pres Vladimir Putin, RU-ZA Amb Ilya Rogachev; RU-UN Amb Vasily Nebenzya:
Kremlin: President Vladimir Putin via Kremlin Press Office (press_office@prpress.gov.ru); FSB: Gen Bortnikov (fsb@fsb.ru); RU-US Emb: Anatoly Antonov (RusPressUSA@mid.ru); Min of Foreign Affairs: Spokesperson: Maria Zakarova (ministry@mid.ru); RU-ZA Emb: Ilya Igorevich Rogachev (ruspospr@mweb.co.za); RU-NL Emb: Alexander Vasilievich Shulgin (rusembassynl@mid.ru); RU-UN Amb Vasily Nebenzya: Fedor Strzhizhovskiy (press@russiaun.ru);

.

Leave a Comment