* One South Africa, Mmusi Maimane, Mike Morris, IRR: Inst Race Relations, Gabriel Crouce, Hermann Pretorius, Kelebogile Leepile, Sihle Ngobese, SA National Editors Forum, Sbu Ngalwa, Democratic Alliance, John Steenhuisen, UIM: United Independent Movement: Neil de Beer.
* 25 Oct: EoP Re: OSA-MM: Open letter to white South Africans
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v SAPP, EoP v Alt Right, LJ v SGMC, LJ v SANEF / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 1:32 PM
To: ‘One South Africa: Mmusi Maimane’
Cc: ‘DA Leader’; ‘John Steenhuisen’; ‘Counsel: Braam Swart and Partners: Andre van Niekerk’; ‘Winnie’
Subject: EoP Re: OSA-MM: Open letter to white South Africans
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 1:33 PM
To: ‘OSA: Western Cape: Mzwethu’; ‘Eastern Cape: Themba’; ‘KwaZulu-Natal: Mlungisi’; ‘Mpumalanga: Musa’; ‘Limpopo: Mel’
Cc: ‘Helen Zille via DA Federal Head Office’
Subject: EoP Re: OSA-MM: Open letter to white South Africans
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 1:34 PM
To: ‘Mike Morris’; ‘Michael Morris’; ‘IRR: Gabriel Crouce’; ‘Hermann Pretorius’; ‘Kelebogile Leepile’; ‘Sihle Ngobese’
Subject: EoP Re: OSA-MM: Open letter to white South Africans
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 1:36 PM
To: ‘Sbu Ngalwa: SANEF: Dir: Kate Skinner’; ‘Admin: Katekani Chabalala’; ‘Press Council: Johan Retief’; ‘SANEF Media Ethics and Credibility Enquiry: Kathleen Satchwell – Nikiwe Bikitsha – Rich Mkhondo’
Cc: ‘Primedia Broadcasting Group: Mahlatse Mahlase’; ‘News 24: Adriaan Basson’; ‘Moipone Malefane’; ‘Janet Heard’; ‘Monica Laganparsad via New Frame’; ‘Editor’; ‘Fray Intermedia:
Prudence Tlhale’; ‘Paula Fray’; ‘SABC: Angie Kapelianis’; ‘Inst for Advancement of Journalism’; ‘Media Monitoring Africa’; ‘Right to Know: Janine Julisen’; ‘Daily Maverick Insider’; ‘Mark Curtis’; ‘Matt Kennard’; ‘Independent Media: Igbal Surve: Sekunjalo Investments: Exec Chair: Iqbal Survé’; ‘Sekunjalo’; ‘Maude Nyandoro’; ‘Zenariah Barends’; ‘Piet Rampedi’
Subject: EoP Re: OSA-MM: Open letter to white South Africans
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 3:00 PM
To: ‘Neil De Beer: UIM: United Independent Movement’; ‘Invest Fund Africa’; ‘National Youth Leader: Gamalihleli Cuba’
Cc: ‘One South Africa: Mmusi Maimane’
Subject: EoP Re: OSA-MM: Open letter to white South Africans
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 3:44 PM
To: ‘Neil de Beer: Ndebe Group’
Cc: ‘Neil De Beer: UIM: United Independent Movement’
Subject: EoP Re: OSA-MM: Open letter to white South Africans
TO: One South Africa: Mmusi Maimane
CC: Democratic Alliance: John Steenhuisen
Re: N24: Mmusi Maimane: Open letter to white South Africans.
CC: IRR: Michael Morris:
Re: Daily Friend: Mmusi Maimane and the illusion of race
CC: SANEF: Sbu Ngalwa
Ref: 22 Nov: EoP submission to SANEF Inquiry into Media Ethics and Credibility.
EoP Re: OSA-MM: Open letter to white South Africans.
Mmusi Maimane: Dear white South Africans. I write this open letter to those of you …. This letter is an invitation to you. An invitation to a dialogue. To a conversation about a new way of bringing about change in this country we call our home. …. This stems out of a time I recently spent with my wife, a white South African woman, who expressed her genuine fears as to what her role is in today’s South Africa. In particular, how our interracial marriage informs this. You see, our union is an offence to black and white nationalists for different reasons. [N24: Mmusi Maimane: Open letter to white South Africans, via Daily Friend: Mmusi Maimane and the illusion of race]
 In my culture respect is sincere – aka ego literate – brutal honesty. In some cultures respect is defined as gatkruping / sycophancy.
 My African American husband loved me precisely because I was an honest white woman, who had the courage to tell him the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth to his face, and stick with him through our disagreements, and resolve them. When I lived in the Oakland ghetto – being the only white face for miles – I was affectionately known as nigga sister. It was not an insult but a statement of – one of us – affection.
 Our marriage did not last. My siblings and extended families objection to having a sister, cousin, niece, married to a black man was so intense they accused me of mental disorders and attempted to have me institutionalized [H 51/19: LJ v Graeme Johnstone and Five Others]. My husbands extended family objection to him being married to an Afrikaner was simply not to include me as a family member. We amicably separated to find partners of our own race.
» EoP Applicant Statement to Judge Erasmus: Request Written Reasons for Case Dismissal
» EoP Leg Sub: 09 Nov: LJ Re: Notice: Judicial Service Commission and Judge NC Erasmus: EoP Applicant Statement to Judge Erasmus: Request Written Reasons for Case Dismissal: EoP Applicant Statement to Judicial Service Commission: Request EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures Judge: Case Dismissal Merit Issues in Dispute.
If your OSA or Maimane family message published in conscious and intentional or unconscious and negligent WiP Law [eop-v-wip-law] Media [eop-v-wip-media] publication: News 24 [N24: Mmusi Maimane: Open letter to white South Africans] was consciously and intentionally not for the attention of EoP Honest Lives Matter Culture South Africans and/or EoP Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] negotiatiors: No offence taken. Apologies for bothering.
LPC-CL: …. as you are aware, [the LPC] is the regulatory body for the legal profession.
EoP-LJ: LPC officials should make up their minds as to whether the LPC is an EoP and WiP law, or WiP Law Only legal profession regulatory body. Until it does so: EoP MILED Clerk is the legal regulatory body for the EoP law legal profession [EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF]. The supreme national and global national security priority for EoP law culture is building an EoP Axis Alliance to submit EoP UN Resolution to UN General Assembly; to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71; lj-v-ls: PDF: pp.25-66/70] as international law; to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation to a global low tech organic family farm agrarian economy.
» EoP Leg Sub: 07 May: LJ Re LPC-CL Re: LJ v NMN: Draft Settlement Agreement; 21 Oct: EoP Law Q: PI & WINEP: EoP or WiP law TRC vote [PW].
Judge Colin Lamont:  Lara Johnstone, the sole member of an entity known as the Radical Honesty Culture and Religion delivered a number of documents by electronic transmission. I tabled the documents at the hearing and they form part of the record. [SAFLII: Afri-Forum and Another v Malema and Others (20968/2010)  ZAEQC 2; 2011 (6) SA 240 (EqC);  4 All SA 293 (EqC); 2011 (12) BCLR 1289 (EqC) (12 September 2011)]
» EoP Leg Sub: 09 Nov: LJ Re: Notice: Judicial Service Commission and Judge NC Erasmus: EoP Applicant Statement to Judicial Service Commission: Request EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures Judge.
EoP MILED Clerk: An Abel EoP law Amicus was filed into the legal negotiations between Afriforum and Julius Malema; but neither Afriforum nor EFF and others involved in the issues in dispute discussion; were interested in EoP law solutions to their racial resource conflict issues in dispute. EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] is the updated Ecology of Peace version of the EoP TRC Amicus submitted to Afriforum v EFF.
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Oct: EoP Re: SA’s – Abel Dadullah Sankara or Kane Zille – Senekal Moment.
Paul Harris: A few days later I walked through the long Kafkaesque hallways of the federal building on my way to court. I could not help but recognize that in this hallowed building of the law, all eight judges were white, all the U.S. attorneys were white, all the federal public defenders were white, all the probation officers, bailiffs, law clerks, and secretaries were white. Everyone was white except the defendant. We stood in court facing U.S. District Court Judge Stanley A. Weigel. Judge Weigel was a liberal in matters of civil liberties and civil rights, but he was strict with criminals and even stricter with lawyers. He was an intelligent and thorough jurist. His Yale law clerks read every motion and brief and prepared detailed memos for him. A lawyer had to be completely prepared when appearing before him. He also had a reputation for running a dictatorial courtroom. He would fine a lawyer for the violation of any one of over a hundred technical, local court rules. At times, he would lash out at attorneys, humiliating them in open court. One lawyer I knew often threw up before working a trial at which Judge Weigel presided. But you could rely on him to give a defendant a fair trial. The judge began to take Steven’s guilty plea: “You know you have a right to remain silent and not incriminate yourself”, he said. “Do you waive that right?” “Yes, I do,” answered Steven. “You have a right to call witnesses in your behalf. Do you waive that right?” “Yes, I do. “You have a right to confront and, through your lawyer, cross-examine all witnesses. Do you waive that right?” “Yes, I do.” “You have a right to a jury trial, a jury of your peers. Do you understand that right?” “If I had a jury of my peers, I would be found not guilty,” replied Steven. There was a pause as the judge stared at the defendant. “What do you mean?” he asked. “If I had twelve people who were really my peers they would understand my action,” Steven answered. The Judge leaned forward, his eyes piercing into mine. “This is not a guilty plea. Counsel, I thought you told the court this was a guilty plea?” I had been taken completely off guard by Steven’s statements. I quickly asked for some time to confer with my client. The judge motioned to the US. marshals. “Take the defendant and his lawyer, and put them in the holding cell until they straighten things out.” For half an hour Steven and I sat in the cell behind the courtroom as once again I explained my idea of a political, psychiatric defense. Once again he refused, feeling it was hopeless. He said he would plead guilty and answer all the judge’s questions the way the judge expected. We returned to court and went through the litany of rights one waives when one pleads guilty. But when the judge got to the part about a jury of peers, there was only silence. Then Steven spoke out clearly and strongly. “If I had a jury made up of people from Ellis and Fillmore Streets I would be found not guilty!” Judge Weigel was seconds from exploding. “This is not a guilty plea. I refuse to accept the plea. You are going to trial!” At the time, none of us expected that a new defense would be the consequence of Steven’s pride and stubborn refusal to accept the legitimacy of a white legal system. [Guerrilla Law: Black/White Rage Confronts the Law]
» EoP Leg Sub: 09 Oct: McV20: EoP law definition of sincere peacenik / honourable warrior; 10 Oct: McV20: EoP law definition of sincere peacenik – honourable warrior / EoP Upd Re: McV20 Negs Re McChrystal Biden Harris Endorsement; 21 Oct: EoP Law Q: PI & WINEP: EoP or WiP law TRC vote
EoP-LJ 01B: The strategic focus of tygae.org.za is transparent recording publication of EoP TRC to End the Abel and Kane Cold War – EoP Axis Alliance – negotiations, to provide EoP Applicants [eop-applicants], and any and all supporting and/or opposing interested EoP Axis Alliance Negotiations officials, UN Ambassadors [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations], etc with the opportunity to keep themselves informed of all informal and/or legal formal EoP TRC negotiations correspondence, received by and/or sent by EoP MILED Clerk.
EoP-LJ 01C: Any and all EoP Axis Alliance Nations Heads of State are to instruct their UN Ambassador to (a) authorize EoP UN Resolution for submission to UN General Assembly by or before 31 Dec 2020; and/or if already submitted to UN General Assembly by or before 31 Dec 2020; (b) to vote Aye authorizing EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70]: EoP Scientific and Cultural law to become international law; at the time of the UN General Assembly – EoP UN Resolution – vote.
» EoP Leg Sub: 25 Aug: EoP Re: IGM tygae.org.za Q’s / EoP Law Re AlphaGo.
If you are looking for a new WiP – deception of self and others – law [eop-v-wip-law] way of bringing about national and international law legal changes to help South African citizens to resolve racial, religious, class and gender resource conflicts; resulting from the Babylon War is Peace law clauses of international law [08 Aug: EoP Law Re: Babylon – Innocence for $ale Indulgences – WiP Law]. Apologies for bothering. Good luck.
If you are looking for an EoP – honesty to self and others – law [eop-v-wip-law] way of bringing about national and international law legal changes to help South African and global citizens to resolve racial, religious, class and gender resource conflicts; resulting from the Babylon War is Peace law clauses of international law.
If or when you on behalf of One South Africa members; or your wife on behalf of your children; are interested in a scientific – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior legal definition – honest legal conversation with Ecology of Peace [eop-v-wip-law] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] South Africans, kindly send your OSA or Maimane family correspondence directly to Ecology of Peace: Honest Lives Matter media editor: EoP MILED Clerk and/or EoP law Applicant: Lara Johnson.
Informal OSA and Maimane family questions: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Formal legal submissions in terms of your DA leader decision making responses to EoP law informal correspondence to Democratic Alliance, and subsequent EoP Application to South African local, regional, national and Pan African WiP law Political Parties: H 225/19: LJ v Speaker: George Municipal Council and Four Others [lj-v-sgmc], can be sent to: email@example.com
A transcript of all EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War negotiations correspondence sent and received by EoP MILED Clerk: Lara Johnson is available at eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za
EoP Honesty Supremacy Movement:
Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End Abel and Kane Cold War – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior [eop-rh-fr] – honesty supremacy [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] movement. Strategic Goal: Implement EoP SciCult law [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] as international law.
Important is First, or it isn’t. Honesty is First, or it isn’t Important. Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr: mcv20: PDF: pp.44-48/71] is honesty about objective reality for sincere peaceniks / honourable warriors. Ecology of Peace Scientific Law [eop-scicultlaw: mcv20: PDF: pp.49-52/71] refers to Procreation and Consumption below carrying capacity limits. EoP Footprint [eop-footprint: mcv20: PDF: pp.40-43/71] defines how procreation and consumption carrying capacity limit is measured. EoP Cultural law refers to any racial, religious, gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any EoP scientific laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals. Ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy: mcv20: PDF: pp.36-37/71] clarifies how to engage in and/or measure a fully informed consenting agreement. Individuals Rights and Duties under Scientific & Cultural Law: Property Ration [property-ration: mcv20: PDF: pp.59/71] – guaranteed for life – for all individuals who have signed and abide by their responsible freedom [responsible-freedom: mcv20: PDF: pp.61-62/71] oaths. Crimes of Aggression Violations of Scientific & Cultural Law: Violations of (a) Scientific Law are Procreation or Consumption Crimes of Aggression [crimes-of-aggression: mcv20: PDF: pp.32-34/71]; (b) Cultural Law are Deception Crimes of Aggression. EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw] – based on EoP Footprint [eop-footprint] – is the Ecology of Peace culture’s answer to the EoP John Brown – how to get along without deceiving, overbreeding and overconsuming – Question: What is a Sustainable Procreation and Consumption footprint? EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr] is the recommended objective reality socio-legal cultural frame of orientation process for implementing EoP SciCult law as international law.
» McVeigh 2020: Exploratory Committee.
EoP Law Enemy Definition:
EoP MILED Clerk: Generally speaking if your individual identity is that of conscious or unconscious Babylonian, then your enemy is probably a Babylonian Jew or Babylonian Kike or Babylonian sand nigger, or Babylonian cracker, or Babylonian communist, or Babylonian capitalist, etc, depending on your conscious or unconscious preferred racial / religious / ideological bias. If you are an EoPeacenik [eop-axis-oath]; then your enemy is (a) the Babylonian War is Peace clauses of international law; that allow individuals who call themselves citizens to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, resulting in resource depletion, and consequent racial, religious, class, national, gender and inter-generational resource conflict; (b) the individuals of any race, religion, class or gender who consicously and intentionally obstruct the abolition of Babylonian War is Peace clauses of international law; and its replacement with Ecology of Peace clauses of international law; requiring all citizens of all races, religions, nations, classes and genders to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits, and relate in terms of fully informed consenting agreements. [Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF]
So the focus of EoP MILED Clerk on behalf of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants] is (a) finding out whether there are sufficient numbers of the 02% elite [15 Mar: Milgram Two, Eight, Thirty Five & Ninety-Eight % Decision-Makers] who have no objections to the EoP Scientific and Cultural law single standard of scientific procreation, consumption and cultural honesty relating standard laws; and do not object to them being submitted to UN General Assembly for voting into international law; (b) if any 2% elite have objections: whether those objections are scientific or cultural; and whether the parties filing the objections are interested in truthseeking evidentiary enquiry to ascertain the in/accuracy of their scientific and/or cultural objections. If any 2% elite’s scientific or cultural law objections to EoP SciCult law are accurate, then EoP SciCult law can be amended to remove such errors.
» EoP Leg Sub: 13 Jan: EoP Re: John Kaminski: Who exactly is the enemy here?; 22 Jan: EoP Apps: Draft: Withdrawal Notice Re: Duty to Warn Psych v Donald Trump; 20 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options: Defining Enemy.
Put simply: The enemy of EoP law culture citizens is [A] WiP international law: more specifically the clauses of international law enabling (i) procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; and (ii) WiP law extremists: individuals who publicly represent themselves as legal, academic, political, religious, etc resource conflict experts; who consciously and intentionally provide their clients with fraudulent resource conflict legal services advice; and [B] any individual who self-identifies and publicly represents themselves as a legal, military, political, religious or academic resource conflict peacemaker negotiator [15 Mar: Milgram Two, Eight, Thirty Five & Ninety-Eight % Decision-Makers] decision maker; who consciously and intentionally obstructs EoP law culture efforts to establish a legal or academic venue for an honest legal scientific evidentiary truthseeking enquiry into ascertaining whether any Milgram 2-35% decision makers objections to the implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law; are based on accurate or inaccurate scientific or cultural evidence; by providing (a) any WiP law extremist objectors evidence proven to be scientifically inaccurate the opportunity to withdraw their scientifically inaccurate objection; and consent to EoP SciCult law; and/or (b) EoP MILED Clerk to amend EoP SciCult law, if or where any WiP law objectors evidence exposes any errors in EoP SciCult law; enabling (c) EoP MILED Clerk to submit a scientifically accurate EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] submission to UNGA / ICJ for a legal certainty EoP or WiP international law vote and/or declaratory order and/or ruling.
EoP Axis Alliance Cooperators:
The EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War Pro Se Amicus submitted – with consent from Ngcobo SA Concourt Justices [PDF] – to the South African Constitutional Court in CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm] argued that South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was negligent and/or a fraud, denying both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict. …. The EoP TRC Amcius was supported by an expert witness affidavit from Dr Michael Maher on media censorship of overpopulation causes of resource conflict: Written Statement of Consent by T. Michael Maher, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness for How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection and Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue [PDF].
» EoP Leg Sub: 03 May: 03 May: Ngcobo Concourt Justices Order: Citizen v McBride: Lara Johnstone admitted as Amicus Curiae.
The EoP TRC Amicus was also supported by an expert witness affidavit from Dr Brad Blanton. » Dr Blanton subsequently angrily verbally withdrew all his written expert witness affidavits in response to an EoP TRC application filed on behalf of Anders Breivik [26 Jul: Radical Honesty Coaching Blog Discussion: Re: Norway v. Breivik/Berwick: Application to Chief Justice Tore Schei ITO Article 85: Treason: PW]. As of date Dr Blanton has refused to clarify whether his verbal withdrawal of his expert witness affidavits was simply angry ranting or his sincere legal intentions; by formally withdrawing his expert witness affidavits per affidavit in writing [06 Nov: Timothy J McVeigh: Formal Apology: Re: Fraud of Radical Honesty Cult; 16 Dec: EoP Re: Seeds of Russiagate are in FBI-VA: LJvBB complaint; 20 Jun: LJ Req LJ v BB Info Help to Page Co Sheriff: Chad Cubbage; 06 Jun: McV20: EoP Re: BB: Radical Honesty is bullshit psych therapy. I’m just trying to make a buck; 12 Sep: McVeigh2020 EoP Sci-Cult Law Judge Picks; 23 Sep: McV20 Re: JGB Re McV20 Re: Romney Re: Senate SCOTUS election / RH: So, you think you’re honest, hmmmm].
» 02 Dec 2009: Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’; submitted into the High Court, Western Cape, Case # 19963-09, Application for Review, of conviction of Lara Johnstone, of the Radical Honesty culture and religion, on the charge of ‘crimen injuria’ [PDF].
» 18 May 2010: CCT 23-10: Written Statement of Consent of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness to: Practicing Radical Honesty and Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness; and Paradigms and Contexts: The Revolution of Consciousness [PDF]
Put simply: An EoP Axis Alliance cooperator is any individual who self-identifies as a Milgram 2-35% EoP v WiP law negotiations truthseeker [15 Mar: Milgram Two, Eight, Thirty Five & Ninety-Eight % Decision-Makers] decision maker; who consciously and intentionally cooperates to establish a legal or academic venue for an honest legal scientific evidentiary truthseeking enquiry into ascertaining whether any Milgram 2-35% decision makers objections to the implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law; are based on accurate or inaccurate scientific or cultural evidence; by providing (a) any WiP law extremist objectors evidence proven to be scientifically inaccurate the opportunity to withdraw their scientifically inaccurate objection; and consent to EoP SciCult law; and/or (b) EoP MILED Clerk to amend EoP SciCult law, if or where any WiP law objectors evidence exposes any errors in EoP SciCult law; enabling (c) EoP MILED Clerk to submit a scientifically accurate EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] submission to UNGA / ICJ for a legal certainty EoP or WiP international law vote and/or declaratory order and/or ruling.
Currently – in the absence of a State authorized EoP Axis Oath office – individuals joining EoP Axis Alliance can submit their unconditional or conditional cooperator EoP Axis Oaths [eop-axis-oath] to EoP MILED Clerk for filing into SA George High Court [lj-v-ls; lj-v-sgmc] proceedings.
EoP oath is a mutual cooperation energy return on energy invested [sq-eroei: eop-v-wip-investing] promise – a form of labour or information barter exchange reciprocity [Dmitry Orlov Twilight of the Antipodes: Reciprocity as a form of social-currency; particularly where other forms of currency have collapsed due to economic collapse. Reciprocity builds stronger relationships; even some animals practice reciprocity such as when a cat that is taken care of by its owner, it will bring it a dead mouse to say thank you.] – purchase of labour or information sharing cooperation with very clear unambiguous honest communication as to what the collective strategic goal is. If or when there is a mutual overlap agreement on strategic goal between two or more individuals, they can sign an unconditional or conditional cooperator oath, to clarify their cooperator commitment to the strategic goal. The oath is a process to learn to practice in decision-making, communication and relating responsible freedom self government 24/7/365: If or when my ego gets in the way of me cooperating, towards our strategic goal; I will not run away or play some passive aggressive egomindfuck games. I will be my own or your Sgt Major and bitch slap my own or your fragile ego Private through the face with clear sincere verbal feedback, to help quick resolution of our misunderstanding, disagreement with you my fellow Oath co-operator; to enable us to uphold our cooperation agreement towards our shared strategic goal, through potentially difficult times. It’s a statement of: our strategic goal is our cooperative master, not our individual ego’s.
» EoP Leg Sub: 22 Jul: McV20 Re: Greg Johnson NB Principles; Richard Spencer: Trump WN Congame; 29 Jul: EoP Obs: Everytime they make it – abolish babylon idea meritocracy – plain kissed, the worlds intelligence chiefs held their breath.
EoP Law Applications requesting / suggesting official State EoP Axis Oath Offices:
EoP Axis Oaths provide a mandate for Heads of State to implement EoP law: EoP – John Brown: Exit Babylon; Return to Eden – UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation.
* South Africa: EoP Negotiations with CRL Rights Commission [Commission for Promotion & Protection of Rights of Cultural, Religious & Linguistic Communities] have resulted in CRLRC making a Recognition of EoP Community Council Offer. CRLRC have not yet consented to EoP and WiP law judge to adjudicate disputes between EoP and WiP law cultures [lj-v-crlrc]
* USA: Request to Congress via Rep Tulsi Gabbard and Thomas Massie [04 Oct: McV20: Draft House Res for USvJPA/IRvUS EoP TRC peace wedding: Draft: House EoP Axis Oath DB Coop Resolution: PDF. pp.150].
* USA: Request to US Navy JAG via General Mattis [04 Jun: EoP Law Re: Gen Mattis: Floyd Protestors need to unite around a common purpose]
* Russia: Request to Russian Duma and Belarussian House of Representatives [17 Oct: McVeigh2020 Q’s for Duma via Speaker Matviyenko; BY House of Rep via President Pavlovich; BY Opposition via Speaker Tsikhanouskaya: Last Will and Testament: LJ, incl FSB Assisted Suicide authorization. Nominated Executor: Geoffrey Fieger. [PDF: pp.04]; Duma EoP Resolution: Answers to EoP OKC TRC questions [PDF: pp.09].
* Intnl: Suggestion to Intnl Court of Justice via Iran v USA, US v Julian Assange [20 Sep: EoP Amicus: US v JP Assange, IR v USA: EoP Law Amicus Affidavit in Support of Parties Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation Settlement Agreement Resolution: PDF: pp.143]
EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529
Sent per electronic notice to:
One South Africa: Mmusi Maimane:
One South Africa: Mmusi Maimane (firstname.lastname@example.org); OSA: Western Cape: Mzwethu (email@example.com); Eastern Cape: Themba (firstname.lastname@example.org); KwaZulu-Natal: Mlungisi (email@example.com); Mpumalanga: Musa (firstname.lastname@example.org); Limpopo: Mel (email@example.com); Added: National Youth Leader: Gamalihleli Cuba (firstname.lastname@example.org); Neil De Beer: UIM: United Independent Movement (email@example.com); Invest Fund Africa (firstname.lastname@example.org); Ndebe Group (email@example.com)
IRR: Daily Friend: Michael Morris:
Mike Morris (Mike.Morris@uct.ac.za); Michael Morris (firstname.lastname@example.org); IRR: Gabriel Crouce (email@example.com); Hermann Pretorius (firstname.lastname@example.org); Kelebogile Leepile (email@example.com); Sihle Ngobese (firstname.lastname@example.org);
SA National Editors Forum: Chair Sbu Ngalwa:
Sbu Ngalwa: SANEF: Dir: Kate Skinner (email@example.com); Admin: Katekani Chabalala (firstname.lastname@example.org); Primedia Broadcasting Group: Mahlatse Mahlase (MahlatseM@EWN.co.za); News 24: Adriaan Basson (email@example.com); Moipone Malefane (firstname.lastname@example.org); Janet Heard (email@example.com); Monica Laganparsad via New Frame (firstname.lastname@example.org); Editor (email@example.com); Fray Intermedia:
Prudence Tlhale (firstname.lastname@example.org); Paula Fray (email@example.com); SABC: Angie Kapelianis (firstname.lastname@example.org); Inst for Advancement of Journalism (email@example.com); Media Monitoring Africa (firstname.lastname@example.org); Right to Know: Janine Julisen (email@example.com); Press Council: Johan Retief (firstname.lastname@example.org); SANEF Media Ethics and Credibility Enquiry: Kathleen Satchwell – Nikiwe Bikitsha – Rich Mkhondo (email@example.com); Daily Maverick Insider (firstname.lastname@example.org); Mark Curtis (email@example.com); Matt Kennard (firstname.lastname@example.org); Independent Media: Igbal Surve: Sekunjalo Investments: Exec Chair: Iqbal Survé (email@example.com); Sekunjalo (firstname.lastname@example.org); Maude Nyandoro (email@example.com); Zenariah Barends (firstname.lastname@example.org); Piet Rampedi (email@example.com)
Democratic Alliance: John Steenhuisen:
Helen Zille via DA Federal Head Office (firstname.lastname@example.org); DA Leader (email@example.com); John Steenhuisen (firstname.lastname@example.org); Speaker: Masizole Mnqasela (email@example.com); Counsel: Braam Swart and Partners: Andre van Niekerk (Prok2@braamswart.co.za); Winnie (firstname.lastname@example.org)