* Neil De Beer, UIM: United Ind Movement, Loving Life, Scott Balson, One South Africa, Mmusi Maimane, Mandela Rhodes Foundation, Njabulo Ndebele, Zindzi Mandela Foundation, Mkhulu Nsingiza, Mandela Legacy Foundation, Zondwa Mandela, Nelson Mandela Foundation, Sello Hatang, Graca Machel Trust, Nelson Mandela Childrens Foundation, Konehali Gugushe, Nelson Mandela, Zelda Le Grange, Afriforum, Kallie Kriel, TAU: Transvaal Agricultural Union, EFF: Economic Freedom Fighters: Julius Malema, Vereniging vir Afrikaans Regslui, Koos Malan, Tinyiko Maluleke, Michael Morris, Helen Zille, Dept of Defence, Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula, Cyril Ramaphosa, ZA-UN Emb, Jerry Matjila, AU-UN Emb, Fatiam Mohammed
* 25 Oct: EoP Q: What is UIM’s definition of national security?
* Tygae: EoP Leg Sub: LJ v SAPP, EoP v Alt Right, LJ v SGMC, EoP v Nobel, APD v AJM, LJ v NMN, LJ v C Ramaphosa, LJ v LS / EoP NWO SCO: EoP NTE GMZA| EoP Axis MilNec Evac: Lotto: EoP v WiP Law, EoP v WiP Academia, EoP v WiP Media, EoP v WiP Charity, EoP v WiP Peacenik / EoP v WiP Neg.
From: EoP MILED Clerk [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 6:56 PM
To: ‘Neil de Beer: UIM: United Independent Movement’; ‘Invest Fund Africa’; ‘Ndebe Group’
Cc: ‘One South Africa: Mmusi Maimane’; ‘OSA: Western Cape: Mzwethu’; ‘Eastern Cape: Themba’; ‘KwaZulu-Natal: Mlungisi’; ‘Mpumalanga: Musa’; ‘Limpopo: Mel’; ‘National Youth Leader: Gamalihleli Cuba’
Subject: EoP Q: What is UIM’s definition of national security?
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 6:57 PM
To: ‘Loving Life: Scott Balson’
Subject: EoP Media Re Loving Life: The Great Debate: Neil de Beer v Julius Malema
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 6:59 PM
To: ‘Mandela Rhodes Foundation: Njabulo Ndebele’; ‘Ernst Gerber’; ‘Abigail McDougall’; ‘Mkhulu Nsingiza: Zindzi Mandela Foundation’; ‘Zindzi Mandela Foundation’; ‘Mandela Legacy Foundation: Zondwa Mandela’; ‘Paul Erasmus: Dylan Erasmus: Wanadoo Woodcrafts’; ‘Nelson Mandela Foundation: Counsel: Rupert Candy Attorneys’; ‘Nelson Mandela Childrens Foundation: Konehali Gugushe’; ‘Kathi Scott’;
Cc: ‘Nelson Mandela: Zelda le Grange’; ‘Graca Machel Trust’; ‘Josina Machel’; ‘Gwadamirai Majange’; ‘Nthateng Mhlambiso’; ‘Kgomotso Seko’; ‘Rachel Toku-Appiah’; ‘Rosemary Viljoen’; ‘Carole Wanjau’
Subject: EoP TN Re MRF-NN: Imagine SA Whites Declare themselves No Longer White
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 7:01 PM
CEO: Kallie Kriel’; ‘CEO: Alana Bailey’; ‘Youth: Ernsts Roets’; ‘Willie Spies’; ‘Adv. Martin Brassey’; ‘TAU: Transvaal Agricultural Union: Bennie van Zyl’; ‘Henk van de Graaf’; ‘Counsel: Riaan van der Walt’; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org’; ‘Adv. Roelof du Plessis’; ‘EFF: Economic Freedom Fighters: Julius Malema: EFF: Economic Freedom Fighters: Julius Malema’; ‘Slindokuhle Njapha’; ‘Mbuyiseni Quintin Ndlozi’; ‘Yazini Tetyana’; ‘Yazini Tetyana’; ‘Black First Land First: Andile Mngxitama’; ‘Adekeye Inc. Byron Morris’; ‘Adv. Vincent Maleka SC’; ‘Vereniging vir Afrikaans Regslui: Prof. Koos Malan’
Cc: ‘Tinyiko Maluleke’; ‘Mike Morris’; ‘IRR: Sihle Ngobese’; ‘Helen Zille via DA Federal Head Office’; ‘DA Leader’; ‘John Steenhuisen’; ‘Speaker: Masizole Mnqasela’; ‘Counsel: Braam Swart and Partners: Andre van Niekerk’; ‘Winnie’
Subject: EoP TN Re: SA’s – Abel Dadullah Sankara or Kane Zille – Senekal Moment.
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 7:04 PM
To: ‘Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula: Dept of Defence’; ‘Joy Nonzukiso Peter’; ‘Siphiso Dlamini’; ‘Mafi Mgobozi’; ‘Mangaliso Khonza’; ‘Michael Kunene’; ‘Xolani Mabanga’; ‘Solly Zacharia Shoke’; ‘Siphiwe Dlamini’; ‘Mosuwa Samuel Hlongwane’; ‘Zamokuhle Sithole’
Cc: ‘Office of Presidency: Robert Ngobeni’; ‘Malebo Sibiya’; ‘David Dabede Mabuza’;
‘Yasmeen Ally’; ‘ZA-UN Amb: Jerry Matthews Matjila’; ‘AU-UN Amb Fatiam Kyari Mohammed: Legal Council: Namira Negm: Esther Azaa Tankouj’
Subject: EoP TRC Negs Upd Re: H 213/19: LJ v NMN: EoP TRC Martial Law to Implement EoP UN Resolution
TO: UIM: Neil de Beer
CC: Loving Life: Scott Balson
CC: One South Africa: Mmusi Maimane
Re: N24: Mmusi Maimane: Open letter to white South Africans; OSA: Mandela would not be part of ANC if he was alive today’ – Neil de Beer joins forces with Maimane; Loving Life: The Great Debate: Neil de Beer v Julius Malema
Ref: 25 Oct: EoP Re: OSA-MM: Open letter to white South Africans.
CC: Afri-Forum and Another v Malema and Others
CC: Tinyiko Maluleke, Michael Morris, Helen Zille:
Re: para 48 of SAFLII: Afri-Forum and Another v Malema and Others (20968/2010)  ZAEQC 2; 2011 (6) SA 240 (EqC);  4 All SA 293 (EqC); 2011 (12) BCLR 1289 (EqC) (12 September 2011): EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] is EoP law update of EoP TRC Amicus submitted to Afriforum v EFF.
Ref: 18 Oct: EoP Re: SA’s – Abel Dadullah Sankara or Kane Zille – Senekal Moment.
CC: Mandela Rhodes Foundation: Njabulo Ndebele:
CC: Nelson Mandela Foundation: Sello Hatang:
CC: Zindzi Mandela Foundation: Mkhulu Nsingiza:
CC: Mandela Legacy Foundation: Zondwa Mandela:
CC: Nelson Mandela Childrens Foundation: Konehali Gugushe:
CC: Nelson Mandela: Zelda le Grange
Re: The Conversation: MRF-NN: SAfrica needs a fresh national imagination: here are some ideas
Ref: 19 Oct: EoP Re MRF-NN: Imagine SA Whites Declare themselves No Longer White; 19 Oct: EoP Media Re MRF-NN: Imagine SA Whites Declare themselves No Longer White.
CC: Dept of Defence: Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula
Ref: 13 Nov: H 213/19: LJ v NMN: Service per SAPO: Reg Mail & Postnet Courier.
CC: ZA-AU Pres Ramaphosa, ZA-UN Amb: Jerry Matjila, AU-UN Amb Fatiam Mohammed:
Ref: 31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations
Mr de Beer:
EoP Q: What is UIM’s definition of national security?
OSA: The One South Africa Movement and newly-formed United Independent Movement join together to bring about #DirectElections in South Africa. Today, Chief Activist of the One South Africa Movement (OSA), Mmusi Maimane, joins business mogul and former ANC National Security Advisor, Neil De Beer, as he announces his resignation from the ANC after more than 30 years of membership to form the United Independent Movement (UIM). Mr De Beer is currently President of Invest Fund Africa and has served in various roles in the ANC and in government. A former ANC National Security Advisor to Nelson Mandela and Umkhonto we Sizwe intelligence agent, Neil was most recently Special Advisor to the Deputy Minister of Defence and Military Veterans. Much of his story is detailed in the bestselling book ‘Undercover with Mandela’s Spies.’ [OSA: Mandela would not be part of ANC if he was alive today’ – Neil de Beer joins forces with Maimane]
Mmusi Maimane: Dear white South Africans. I write this open letter to those of you …. This letter is an invitation to you. An invitation to a dialogue. To a conversation about a new way of bringing about change in this country we call our home. …. This stems out of a time I recently spent with my wife, a white South African woman, who expressed her genuine fears as to what her role is in today’s South Africa. In particular, how our interracial marriage informs this. You see, our union is an offence to black and white nationalists for different reasons. [N24: Mmusi Maimane: Open letter to white South Africans, via Daily Friend: Mmusi Maimane and the illusion of race]
EoP MILED Clerk: If by ‘white’ you mean biological racial; generally speaking I am considered white. Although in Steve Biko’s court, Steve Biko would have referred to me as pink and the judge would have referred to Biko as brown, not black [Cry Freedom: Trailer: White/Pink & Brown/Black]. If racial apartheid laws were still in effect in South Africa, I would have legally notified Verwoerdtopia National Party Apartheid South African government officials that I was not a member of the Masonic War is Peace white or black ‘race’; in the same way that I have repeatedly notified Mandelatopia ANC South African officials that I am not a member of Babylon War is Peace left or right, white or black – deception of self and others – legal WiP law culture [03 May: Concourt Justices Order: Citizen v McBride: Lara Johnstone admitted as Amicus Curiae; 17 Oct: Re: Lara Johnstone Changes Cultural Membership; 14 Mar: Draft: Referral to Mediation: SA Political Parties: Req Confirm/Deny legal certainty accuracy of EoP RH FR Sincere Peacenik / Honourable Warrior principles].
» EoP Leg Sub: 22 Nov: EoP Re: Above the Law: 5 Tips For So-Called White Allies This Thanksgiving; 05 Dec: EoP Re: EFF: Johann Rupert President of Racist White South Africa
Judge Colin Lamont:  Lara Johnstone, the sole member of an entity known as the Radical Honesty Culture and Religion delivered a number of documents by electronic transmission. I tabled the documents at the hearing and they form part of the record. [SAFLII: Afri-Forum and Another v Malema and Others (20968/2010)  ZAEQC 2; 2011 (6) SA 240 (EqC);  4 All SA 293 (EqC); 2011 (12) BCLR 1289 (EqC) (12 September 2011)]
» EoP Leg Sub: 09 Nov: LJ Re: Notice: Judicial Service Commission and Judge NC Erasmus: EoP Applicant Statement to Judicial Service Commission: Request EoP and WiP Conflict of Cultures Judge.
EoP MILED Clerk: An Abel EoP law Amicus was filed into the legal negotiations between Afriforum and Julius Malema; but neither Afriforum nor EFF and others involved in the issues in dispute discussion; were interested in EoP law [eop-v-wip-law] solutions to their racial resource conflict issues in dispute. EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] is the updated Ecology of Peace version of the EoP TRC Amicus submitted to Afriforum v EFF.
» EoP Leg Sub: 18 Oct: EoP Re: SA’s – Abel Dadullah Sankara or Kane Zille – Senekal Moment.
McVeigh 2020 [mcveigh2020]: A handshake is a very low cost way of making contracts, but is worthless in a community with lotsa liars. Gimbutas noted the stable – no population & economic consumption growth – Steppe Aryan population: that a low tech agrarian village founded in 8000 BC was still a low tech agrarian village in 4000BC. This also allowed them to sustainably farm the land, and live in peace. There are no steppe Aryan palaces, no prisons, no mental institutions, no homeless, no landless and no unemployed. No harems; they didnt even have marriage, just as the Musou still today. Among whom, rape & murder are so rare they dont have words for it. [SQSwans: Day Brown: Proto Indo-European: 23 January 2017; SQ-DS: The Mosou Matriarchy: Men Live Better where Women are in Charge.]
» McVeigh 2020: Return to Eden: EoP – End Civ – UN Resolution; EoP Leg Sub: 29 May: EoP Law Re: Designing an honesty trust sustainable society.
I don’t speak for the ANC, Nelson Mandela or any Mandela foundation.
The Ecology of Peace law definition of strategic national and global security: Build EoP Axis Alliance to authorize EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] for submission to UN General Assembly and/or Intnl Court of Justice to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law.
EoP Law racial, religious, ideological and – national and global security definition – strategic goal can be summarized as building an EoP Axis [eop-axis] Alliance of unconditional and conditional cooperators [eop-axis-oath]; to submit EoP UN Resolution to implement EoP Scientific and Cultural law [mcveigh2020: PDF: pp.26-67/71 | lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70| lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.17-54/56 | lj-v-shoc: PDF: 43-84/88 | lj-v-nmn: PDF: pp.11-76/83| lj-v-trc: PDF: pp.30-71/137 | nz-v-bt PDF: pp.156-197/261 | ir-v-us: PDF: pp.59-100/143] as international law; to enable orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation economic degrowth path to a low tech responsible freedom family farm agrarian economy.
» EoP Leg Sub: 08 Aug: EoP Law Re: Babylon – Innocence for $ale Indulgences – WiP Law; 12 Sep: McVeigh2020 EoP Sci-Cult Law Judge Picks; 25 Sep: McV20 Re JGB Re McV EoP Q to JBrent re: Clugston: Blip: Humanitys Predicament; 01 Oct: McV20: EoP Q Re: Stan McChrystal Biden Harris Endorsement.
Ecology of Peace law Bram Fischer MK-AWB Advice:
Nelson Mandela et al: Gentlemen the time for talking is over. The only path to change is through the bullet and the bomb [An Act of Defiance: Trailer; Bram Fischer: Trailer]
» IG: 17-08-26_eopwin-wiplose-fischerlutherqutb.
Jonathan Powell: If either side still thinks there is still some option of winning militarily then its very hard to bring them together into a proper and meaningful negotiation. I fear when you get into that kind of situation, you may have to go through the whole cycle of blood, the whole further revolution before you can get back to the opportunity of making peace. Its a tragedy of losing a whole generation dying in such disputes before you can actually get into a solution. …. The IRA wanted a united ireland, and it didn’t get a United Ireland. What it got was the ability to pursue its aims through political means. To argue for a United Ireland, but not to get one through force or the threat of force. What the Unionists got was the Union, the abandonment of the Irish govement to the claim of Northern Ireland. They got a devolved assemly and peace and prosperity. So I don’t think its a fair critique [from the left and right] saying that we gave in to the terrorists and gave them what they wanted. I think also that you should be prepared to talk to terrorists if you want to bring about a solution in these kinds of situations. If you want to get the guns out of politics and if that is what is being demanded of you; then you have to talk to those with the guns to ask them to give up their guns. You can’t do it without talking to them. I must say I found it very difficult at the beginning anyway to talk to Sinn Fein representatives. My father had been shot up by the IRA, my brother had been on a death liste for ten years. I felt quite strongly about it. But it is necessary in a process like this to build up trust, to establish a relationship with such people if you are going to negotiate with them and persuade them to give up their guns. The serious point in this is that you cannot think that you will persuade republicans in this case and terrorists in other cases unless you talk to them. So you have to talk to them unless you think there is a purely military solution. And the British army after a disastrous start in Northern Ireland with bloody sunday and the internment, realized quite early in the 1980s that there wasn’t going to be a military solution. [RSA: Jonathan Powell – Great Hatred, Little Room: making peace in Northern Ireland; BBC: The Martin McGuinness I Knew].
EoP law legal services recognizes that there is no military solution between nations national militaries against each other. In the absence of a civilian political or legal EoP Axis Alliance solution; there an EoP Axis Alliance of cooperating militaries military solution against Babylon War is Peace international law.
Your Common Defense Pledge to End America’s Forever Wars pledge – if you want it to be effective – needs to (a) abolish the root cause of global perpetual war economy: i.e. the clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; and (b) provide legislation enabling the people who are currently employed in the perpetual war slavery freedumb economy; to transition to a militia responsible freedom peace economy. EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70; ir-v-us: PDF: pp.59-100/143] to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural law as international law, does both.
» EoP Leg Sub: 06 Mar: EoP Re Common Defense Pledge to End America’s Forever Wars.
EoP Law Axis Oath Alliance v WiP Law Ego Dictator Revolutionary Legal Services:
Active listening [Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle] is part of EoP law [eop-v-wip-law] ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy: lj-v-ls: PDF pp.36-37/70] legal services conflict resolution communication relationship practices; to enable clear communication, that does not waste any friend, foe, neutral observer, potential ally convert or impartial or enemy prosecutor, judge, or jurors time. Put differently: If Bram Fischer was ego-eco literate legal services practitioner, (a) if Mandela et al had asked him for his – how can the ANC legally and nonviolently overthrow the Apartheid government – legal services advice, prior to launching MKs military insurgency anti-apartheid guerrilla war, (b) a summary of EoP lawyer Fischers Q&A advice would have been: [A] If you are EoP law revolutionaries; sign your EoP Axis Oaths [eop-axis-oaths], setup an ANC EoP Axis Oath office and ask all ANC members to sign their EoP Axis Oaths; to provide me a mandate to file EoP legal applications to Verwoerdtopia Apartheid courts [ie. similar to those that have been filed by EoP Applicant to Mandelatopia Apartheid courts: lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70| lj-v-sgmc: PDF: pp.17-54/56 | lj-v-nmn: PDF: pp.11-76/83 | tc-v-rm: 31 Aug: TN: EoP Law definitions: sincere peacenik and corruption]; to ask National Party leadership to cooperate with us to build a global EoP Axis Alliance coalition to abolish WiP international law; [B] If you are WiP law revolutionaries, ask a WiP law revolutionary lawyer; I am not a competent WiP law revolutionary paralegal.
» EoP Leg Sub: 21 Oct: LJ Re YH Re Roy Elliott-Nugget Hamilton Injury Damages Claim: Edit: Edwin Rutsch: Empathy aka Active Listening Circle.
The draft of the EoP Law Axis Alliance military democracy solution to abolish Babylon War is Peace international law, by implementing EoP Scientific and Cultural law – via EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70; ir-v-us: PDF: pp.59-100/143] – as international law; has been submitted to American and South Africa and military officials, judges and lawyers.
[A] Military Elite EoP TRC or No EoP TRC Vote:
Depending on EoP Axis MilOrg (A) Majority Vote Wins or (B) Believability Vote Wins [06 Aug: LJ v LS CEO Req for Invest Info: Peter Blanken & Michael Burry], voting process:
[A1] All Generals – currently serving or retired – vote: EoP TRC voters sign their EoP Axis NatSec Oath [eop-axis-oath]: No EoP TRC voters decline to sign any EoP Axis Oath.
[A1a] If EoP TRC: No EoP TRC Generals resign, EoP TRC Generals can allow Colonels to Captains to vote; or proceed to [B] Military Judges Vote or [C] EoP TRC: EoP UN Resolution Martial Law.
[A1b] If No EoP TRC: All Generals consent/authorize H 111/19: LJ v LS ‘No EoP TRC: Lara & Tim Siberia Assisted Suicide’ provisions.
[B] Military Judges EoP TRC or No EoP Vote:
Depending on EoP Axis Military Judges (A) Majority Vote Wins or (B) Believability Vote Wins [06 Aug: LJ v LS CEO Req for Invest Info: Peter Blanken & Michael Burry], voting process:
[B1] All Military Judges – currently serving or retired – vote: EoP TRC voters sign their EoP Axis NatSec Oath [eop-axis-oath]; No EoP TRC voters decline to sign any EoP Axis Oath.
[B1a] If EoP TRC: No EoP TRC Mil Judges resign, EoP TRC Mil Judges allow lower court military judges/lawyers to vote; or proceed to [C] EoP TRC: EoP UN Resolution Martial Law.
[A2] If No EoP TRC: All Military Judges consent/authorize H 111/19: LJ v LS ‘No EoP TRC: Lara & Tim Siberia Assisted Suicide’ provisions.
[C] EoP TRC: Martial Law to Implement EoP UN Resolution:
[C1] Joint Chiefs/Mil Judges request Presidential Executive Order to establish EoP Axis NatSec Oath legal office requiring:
[C2a] All Judges – including lower court military judges depending on Military Judges decision in [B1a] – ordered to Sign EoP Axis NatSec Def Oath; or are allowed to resign or are fired.
[C2b] All Lawyers – including military lawyers depending on Military Judges decision in [B1a] – ordered to Sign EoP Axis NatSec Def Oath; to keep their license to continue to practice law.
[C2c] All Mainstream Media publishers, editors & journalists ordered to Sign EoP Axis NatSec Def Oath; to keep their FCC media broadcasting license, and publish FCC license media stories.
[C2d] All National legislators ordered to Sign EoP Axis NatSec Def Oath; or (a) lose parliamentary legislation license voting privilege; (b) resign / be fired.
[C2e] EoP Axis NatSec Oath legislators authorize UN Amb to Vote Aye: EoP UN Resolution.
» EoP Leg Sub: 10 Aug: EoP Applicants: Draft: MilDem EoP UN Resolution Martial Law; 13 Aug: EoP TC to SPJ, SDNY, DoJ & WH: Draft: MilDem EoP UN Resolution Martial Law; 16 Aug: EoP TRC Info: USCAAF Judge Stucky; US Fed & State Judges; 15 Nov: H 213/19: LJ v NMN: Service to Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula, Ministry of Defence & Military Veterans per Postnet Courier.
EoP Honesty Supremacy Movement:
Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation (“EoP TRC”) to End Abel and Kane Cold War – sincere peacenik / honourable warrior [eop-rh-fr] – honesty supremacy [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] movement. Strategic Goal: Implement EoP SciCult law [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] as international law.
Important is First, or it isn’t. Honesty is First, or it isn’t Important. Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality [eop-rh-fr: mcv20: PDF: pp.44-48/71] is honesty about objective reality for sincere peaceniks / honourable warriors. Ecology of Peace Scientific Law [eop-scicultlaw: mcv20: PDF: pp.49-52/71] refers to Procreation and Consumption below carrying capacity limits. EoP Footprint [eop-footprint: mcv20: PDF: pp.40-43/71] defines how procreation and consumption carrying capacity limit is measured. EoP Cultural law refers to any racial, religious, gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any EoP scientific laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals. Ego literacy [ego-eco-literacy: mcv20: PDF: pp.36-37/71] clarifies how to engage in and/or measure a fully informed consenting agreement. Individuals Rights and Duties under Scientific & Cultural Law: Property Ration [property-ration: mcv20: PDF: pp.59/71] – guaranteed for life – for all individuals who have signed and abide by their responsible freedom [responsible-freedom: mcv20: PDF: pp.61-62/71] oaths. Crimes of Aggression Violations of Scientific & Cultural Law: Violations of (a) Scientific Law are Procreation or Consumption Crimes of Aggression [crimes-of-aggression: mcv20: PDF: pp.32-34/71]; (b) Cultural Law are Deception Crimes of Aggression. EoP Scientific and Cultural law [eop-scicultlaw] – based on EoP Footprint [eop-footprint] – is the Ecology of Peace culture’s answer to the EoP John Brown – how to get along without deceiving, overbreeding and overconsuming – Question: What is a Sustainable Procreation and Consumption footprint? EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr] is the recommended objective reality socio-legal cultural frame of orientation process for implementing EoP SciCult law as international law.
» McVeigh 2020: Exploratory Committee.
EoP Law Enemy Definition:
EoP MILED Clerk: Generally speaking if your individual identity is that of conscious or unconscious Babylonian, then your enemy is probably a Babylonian Jew or Babylonian Kike or Babylonian sand nigger, or Babylonian cracker, or Babylonian communist, or Babylonian capitalist, etc, depending on your conscious or unconscious preferred racial / religious / ideological bias. If you are an EoPeacenik [eop-axis-oath]; then your enemy is (a) the Babylonian War is Peace clauses of international law; that allow individuals who call themselves citizens to procreate and consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, resulting in resource depletion, and consequent racial, religious, class, national, gender and inter-generational resource conflict; (b) the individuals of any race, religion, class or gender who consicously and intentionally obstruct the abolition of Babylonian War is Peace clauses of international law; and its replacement with Ecology of Peace clauses of international law; requiring all citizens of all races, religions, nations, classes and genders to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits, and relate in terms of fully informed consenting agreements. [Summary EoP v WiP Law: eop-v-wip-law: PDF]
So the focus of EoP MILED Clerk on behalf of EoP Applicants [eop-applicants] is (a) finding out whether there are sufficient numbers of the 02% elite [15 Mar: Milgram Two, Eight, Thirty Five & Ninety-Eight % Decision-Makers] who have no objections to the EoP Scientific and Cultural law single standard of scientific procreation, consumption and cultural honesty relating standard laws; and do not object to them being submitted to UN General Assembly for voting into international law; (b) if any 2% elite have objections: whether those objections are scientific or cultural; and whether the parties filing the objections are interested in truthseeking evidentiary enquiry to ascertain the in/accuracy of their scientific and/or cultural objections. If any 2% elite’s scientific or cultural law objections to EoP SciCult law are accurate, then EoP SciCult law can be amended to remove such errors.
» EoP Leg Sub: 13 Jan: EoP Re: John Kaminski: Who exactly is the enemy here?; 22 Jan: EoP Apps: Draft: Withdrawal Notice Re: Duty to Warn Psych v Donald Trump; 20 Jun: LJ Re IJR-SH Re 1063-20: LJ v TRC: LJ v LS Settlement Agreement Options: Defining Enemy.
Put simply: The enemy of EoP law culture citizens is [A] WiP international law: more specifically the clauses of international law enabling (i) procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits; and (ii) WiP law extremists: individuals who publicly represent themselves as legal, academic, political, religious, etc resource conflict experts; who consciously and intentionally provide their clients with fraudulent resource conflict legal services advice; and [B] any individual who self-identifies and publicly represents themselves as a legal, military, political, religious or academic resource conflict peacemaker negotiator [15 Mar: Milgram Two, Eight, Thirty Five & Ninety-Eight % Decision-Makers] decision maker; who consciously and intentionally obstructs EoP law culture efforts to establish a legal or academic venue for an honest legal scientific evidentiary truthseeking enquiry into ascertaining whether any Milgram 2-35% decision makers objections to the implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law; are based on accurate or inaccurate scientific or cultural evidence; by providing (a) any WiP law extremist objectors evidence proven to be scientifically inaccurate the opportunity to withdraw their scientifically inaccurate objection; and consent to EoP SciCult law; and/or (b) EoP MILED Clerk to amend EoP SciCult law, if or where any WiP law objectors evidence exposes any errors in EoP SciCult law; enabling (c) EoP MILED Clerk to submit a scientifically accurate EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] submission to UNGA / ICJ for a legal certainty EoP or WiP international law vote and/or declaratory order and/or ruling.
EoP Axis Alliance Cooperators:
The EoP TRC to End Abel and Kane Cold War Pro Se Amicus submitted – with consent from Ngcobo SA Concourt Justices [PDF] – to the South African Constitutional Court in CCT 23-10: The Citizen v Robert McBride [tc-v-rm] argued that South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission was negligent and/or a fraud, denying both sides – Apartheid and Anti-Apartheid – an honest enquiry into the root — clauses of international law enabling procreation and consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits — causes of all planetary racial, religious and class resource conflict. …. The EoP TRC Amcius was supported by an expert witness affidavit from Dr Michael Maher on media censorship of overpopulation causes of resource conflict: Written Statement of Consent by T. Michael Maher, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness for How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection and Media Framing and Salience of the Population Issue [PDF].
» EoP Leg Sub: 03 May: 03 May: Ngcobo Concourt Justices Order: Citizen v McBride: Lara Johnstone admitted as Amicus Curiae.
The EoP TRC Amicus was also supported by an expert witness affidavit from Dr Brad Blanton. » Dr Blanton subsequently angrily verbally withdrew all his written expert witness affidavits in response to an EoP TRC application filed on behalf of Anders Breivik [26 Jul: Radical Honesty Coaching Blog Discussion: Re: Norway v. Breivik/Berwick: Application to Chief Justice Tore Schei ITO Article 85: Treason: PW]. As of date Dr Blanton has refused to clarify whether his verbal withdrawal of his expert witness affidavits was simply angry ranting or his sincere legal intentions; by formally withdrawing his expert witness affidavits per affidavit in writing [06 Nov: Timothy J McVeigh: Formal Apology: Re: Fraud of Radical Honesty Cult; 16 Dec: EoP Re: Seeds of Russiagate are in FBI-VA: LJvBB complaint; 20 Jun: LJ Req LJ v BB Info Help to Page Co Sheriff: Chad Cubbage; 06 Jun: McV20: EoP Re: BB: Radical Honesty is bullshit psych therapy. I’m just trying to make a buck; 12 Sep: McVeigh2020 EoP Sci-Cult Law Judge Picks; 23 Sep: McV20 Re: JGB Re McV20 Re: Romney Re: Senate SCOTUS election / RH: So, you think you’re honest, hmmmm].
» 02 Dec 2009: Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’; submitted into the High Court, Western Cape, Case # 19963-09, Application for Review, of conviction of Lara Johnstone, of the Radical Honesty culture and religion, on the charge of ‘crimen injuria’ [PDF].
» 18 May 2010: CCT 23-10: Written Statement of Consent of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness to: Practicing Radical Honesty and Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger and Forgiveness; and Paradigms and Contexts: The Revolution of Consciousness [PDF]
Put simply: An EoP Axis Alliance cooperator is any individual who self-identifies as a Milgram 2-35% EoP v WiP law negotiations truthseeker [15 Mar: Milgram Two, Eight, Thirty Five & Ninety-Eight % Decision-Makers] decision maker; who consciously and intentionally cooperates to establish a legal or academic venue for an honest legal scientific evidentiary truthseeking enquiry into ascertaining whether any Milgram 2-35% decision makers objections to the implementation of EoP Scientific and Cultural law; are based on accurate or inaccurate scientific or cultural evidence; by providing (a) any WiP law extremist objectors evidence proven to be scientifically inaccurate the opportunity to withdraw their scientifically inaccurate objection; and consent to EoP SciCult law; and/or (b) EoP MILED Clerk to amend EoP SciCult law, if or where any WiP law objectors evidence exposes any errors in EoP SciCult law; enabling (c) EoP MILED Clerk to submit a scientifically accurate EoP UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] submission to UNGA / ICJ for a legal certainty EoP or WiP international law vote and/or declaratory order and/or ruling.
Currently – in the absence of a State authorized EoP Axis Oath office – individuals joining EoP Axis Alliance can submit their unconditional or conditional cooperator EoP Axis Oaths [eop-axis-oath] to EoP MILED Clerk for filing into SA George High Court [lj-v-ls; lj-v-sgmc] proceedings.
EoP oath is a mutual cooperation energy return on energy invested [sq-eroei: eop-v-wip-investing] promise – a form of labour or information barter exchange reciprocity [Dmitry Orlov Twilight of the Antipodes: Reciprocity as a form of social-currency; particularly where other forms of currency have collapsed due to economic collapse. Reciprocity builds stronger relationships; even some animals practice reciprocity such as when a cat that is taken care of by its owner, it will bring it a dead mouse to say thank you.] – purchase of labour or information sharing cooperation with very clear unambiguous honest communication as to what the collective strategic goal is. If or when there is a mutual overlap agreement on strategic goal between two or more individuals, they can sign an unconditional or conditional cooperator oath, to clarify their cooperator commitment to the strategic goal. The oath is a process to learn to practice in decision-making, communication and relating responsible freedom self government 24/7/365: If or when my ego gets in the way of me cooperating, towards our strategic goal; I will not run away or play some passive aggressive egomindfuck games. I will be my own or your Sgt Major and bitch slap my own or your fragile ego Private through the face with clear sincere verbal feedback, to help quick resolution of our misunderstanding, disagreement with you my fellow Oath co-operator; to enable us to uphold our cooperation agreement towards our shared strategic goal, through potentially difficult times. It’s a statement of: our strategic goal is our cooperative master, not our individual ego’s.
» EoP Leg Sub: 22 Jul: McV20 Re: Greg Johnson NB Principles; Richard Spencer: Trump WN Congame; 29 Jul: EoP Obs: Everytime they make it – abolish babylon idea meritocracy – plain kissed, the worlds intelligence chiefs held their breath.
EoP Law Applications requesting / suggesting official State EoP Axis Oath Offices:
EoP Axis Oaths provide a mandate for Heads of State to implement EoP law: EoP – John Brown: Exit Babylon; Return to Eden – UN Resolution [lj-v-ls: PDF pp.25-66/70] orderly and humane deindustrialization and depopulation.
* South Africa: EoP Negotiations with CRL Rights Commission [Commission for Promotion & Protection of Rights of Cultural, Religious & Linguistic Communities] have resulted in CRLRC making a Recognition of EoP Community Council Offer. CRLRC have not yet consented to EoP and WiP law judge to adjudicate disputes between EoP and WiP law cultures [lj-v-crlrc]
* USA: Request to Congress via Rep Tulsi Gabbard and Thomas Massie [04 Oct: McV20: Draft House Res for USvJPA/IRvUS EoP TRC peace wedding: Draft: House EoP Axis Oath DB Coop Resolution: PDF. pp.150].
* USA: Request to US Navy JAG via General Mattis [04 Jun: EoP Law Re: Gen Mattis: Floyd Protestors need to unite around a common purpose]
* Russia: Request to Russian Duma and Belarussian House of Representatives [17 Oct: McVeigh2020 Q’s for Duma via Speaker Matviyenko; BY House of Rep via President Pavlovich; BY Opposition via Speaker Tsikhanouskaya: Last Will and Testament: LJ, incl FSB Assisted Suicide authorization. Nominated Executor: Geoffrey Fieger. [PDF: pp.04]; Duma EoP Resolution: Answers to EoP OKC TRC questions [PDF: pp.09].
* Intnl: Suggestion to Intnl Court of Justice via Iran v USA, US v Julian Assange [20 Sep: EoP Amicus: US v JP Assange, IR v USA: EoP Law Amicus Affidavit in Support of Parties Ecology of Peace Truth and Reconciliation Settlement Agreement Resolution: PDF: pp.143]
EoP – OKC TRC – Axis Alliance [31 Mar: EoP Upd: Sergey Lavrov: Re: EoP Axis Alliance negotiations] Honest Lives Matter [29 Jun: EoP Axis Alliance is an Honest Lives Matter culture] Negotiations correspondence is published at EoP Leg Sub [eop-leg-sub.tygae.org.za]
EoP MILED Clerk [EoP Oath PDF]
16 Taaibos Ave, Heatherpark, George, 6529
Sent per electronic notice to:
UIM: Neil de Beer:
Neil De Beer: UIM: United Independent Movement (email@example.com); Invest Fund Africa (firstname.lastname@example.org); Ndebe Group (email@example.com)
Loving Life: Scott Balson:
Loving Life: Scott Balson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
One South Africa: Mmusi Maimane:
One South Africa: Mmusi Maimane (email@example.com); OSA: Western Cape: Mzwethu (firstname.lastname@example.org); Eastern Cape: Themba (email@example.com); KwaZulu-Natal: Mlungisi (firstname.lastname@example.org); Mpumalanga: Musa (email@example.com); Limpopo: Mel (firstname.lastname@example.org); National Youth Leader: Gamalihleli Cuba (email@example.com);
Mandela Rhodes Foundation: Njabulo Ndebele:
Mandela Rhodes Foundation: Njabulo Ndebele (firstname.lastname@example.org); Ernst Gerber (email@example.com); Abigail McDougall (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Zindzi Mandela Foundation: Mkhulu Nsingiza:
Mkhulu Nsingiza: Zindzi Mandela Foundation (email@example.com); Zindzi Mandela Foundation (firstname.lastname@example.org);
Mandela Legacy Foundation: Zondwa Mandela:
Mandela Legacy Foundation (email@example.com); Paul Erasmus: Dylan Erasmus: Wanadoo Woodcrafts (firstname.lastname@example.org);
Nelson Mandela Foundation: Sello Hatang:
Nelson Mandela Foundation: Counsel: Rupert Candy Attorneys (email@example.com); Graca Machel Trust (firstname.lastname@example.org); Josina Machel (email@example.com); Gwadamirai Majange (firstname.lastname@example.org); Nthateng Mhlambiso (NthatengM@gracamacheltrust.org); Kgomotso Seko (email@example.com); Rachel Toku-Appiah (RachelT@gracamacheltrust.org); Rosemary Viljoen (RosemaryV@gracamacheltrust.org); Carole Wanjau (caroleW@gracaMacheltrust.org);
Nelson Mandela Childrens Foundation: Konehali Gugushe:
Nelson Mandela Childrens Foundation: Konehali Gugushe (firstname.lastname@example.org); Kathi Scott (Kathi.email@example.com);
Mary Tiseo (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Nelson Mandela: Zelda Le Grange:
Zelda le Grange (email@example.com);
Afri-Forum and Another v Malema and Others:
CEO: Kallie Kriel (firstname.lastname@example.org), CEO: Alana Bailey (email@example.com), Youth: Ernsts Roets (firstname.lastname@example.org); Willie Spies (email@example.com); Adv. Martin Brassey (firstname.lastname@example.org); TAU: Transvaal Agricultural Union: Bennie van Zyl (email@example.com), Henk van de Graaf (firstname.lastname@example.org); Counsel: Riaan van der Walt (email@example.com), (firstname.lastname@example.org); Adv. Roelof du Plessis (email@example.com);
* EFF: Economic Freedom Fighters: Julius Malema: EFF: Economic Freedom Fighters: Julius Malema (firstname.lastname@example.org); Slindokuhle Njapha (email@example.com); Mbuyiseni Quintin Ndlozi (firstname.lastname@example.org); Yazini Tetyana (email@example.com); Yazini Tetyana (firstname.lastname@example.org); Black First Land First: Andile Mngxitama (email@example.com);
Adekeye Inc. Byron Morris (firstname.lastname@example.org); Adv. Vincent Maleka SC (email@example.com);
* Vereniging vir Afrikaans Regslui: Prof. Koos Malan (firstname.lastname@example.org);
Tinyiko Maluleke (email@example.com)
Mike Morris (Mike.Morris@uct.ac.za); IRR: Sihle Ngobese (firstname.lastname@example.org);
Helen Zille via DA Federal Head Office (email@example.com); DA Leader (firstname.lastname@example.org); John Steenhuisen (email@example.com); Speaker: Masizole Mnqasela (firstname.lastname@example.org); Counsel: Braam Swart and Partners: Andre van Niekerk (Prok2@braamswart.co.za); Winnie (email@example.com)
Dept of Defence: Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula:
Dept of Defence (firstname.lastname@example.org); Joy Nonzukiso Peter (email@example.com); Siphiso Dlamini (firstname.lastname@example.org); Mafi Mgobozi (email@example.com); Mangaliso Khonza (firstname.lastname@example.org); Michael Kunene (email@example.com); Xolani Mabanga (firstname.lastname@example.org); Solly Zacharia Shoke (Solly.Shoke@dod.mil.za); Siphiwe Dlamini (email@example.com); Mosuwa Samuel Hlongwane (firstname.lastname@example.org); Zamokuhle Sithole (email@example.com)
ZA-AU Pres Ramaphosa, ZA-UN Amb: Jerry Matjila, AU-UN Amb Fatiam Mohammed:
Office of Presidency: Robert Ngobeni (Robert@presidency.gov.za); Malebo Sibiya (firstname.lastname@example.org); David Dabede Mabuza (Deputypresident@presidency.gov.za);
Yasmeen Ally (email@example.com); ZA-UN Amb: Jerry Matthews Matjila (Matjilaj@dirco.gov.za); AU-UN Amb Fatiam Kyari Mohammed: Legal Council: Namira Negm: Esther Azaa Tankouj (firstname.lastname@example.org);